Content uploaded by Sushila Singh
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sushila Singh on Dec 07, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
ASIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
ASIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2017.20536
INTRODUCTION
Since time immemorial, medicinal plants are of great
importance to health of individuals and communities. The
medicinal plant products, which are derived from plant parts
such as stem, bark, leaves, fruits and seeds have been part of
phytomedicine that produce a definite physiological action on
human body. The most important of these natural bioactive
constituents of plants are alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids and
phenolic compounds [1].
Among various medicinal plants, Withania somnifera is a
popular Indian medicinal plant belonging to family Solanaceae
and is also known as Ashwagandha, Indian ginseng and Winter
cherry. It is one of the most valuable plants in the traditional
Indian systems of medicine [2]. The roots are main part of the
plant that are widely used as therapeutic agents [3]. The roots
are reported to contain alkaloids, amino acids, steroids, volatile
oil, starch, reducing sugars, glycosides [4]. Ashwagandha roots
contain crude fibre 21.0 to 25.0 %, starch 6.09 to 9.46 mg/g,
tannins 0.39 to 0.82 mg/g, minerals K, Mn, Na, Fe, Zn, Cu,
Al, Ca, Cd & Ni, total sugars 2.52 to 9.52 mg/g, reducing
sugars 0.15 to 2.10 mg/g and non-reducing sugars 2.37 to 7.62
mg/g [5].
Survey of literature reveals that various field studies are
being carried out on promising genotypes of ashwagandha
but very scare information is available on chemical and phyto-
Chemical and Phytochemical Composition of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L.) Roots
SUSHEEL GULATI1, V. K. MADAN1,*, SUSHILA SINGH2, ISHA SINGH1 and DUSYANT1
1Medicinal, Aromatic and Potential Crops Section, Old IATTE Building, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India
2Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India
*Corresponding author: E-mail: vikku60@gmail.com
Received: 23 January 2017; Accepted: 19 May 2017; Published online: 12 June 2017; AJC-18420
The present study was undertaken for estimation of chemical and phytochemical composition of ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L.)
roots of promising genotypes viz. HWS-08-14, HWS-08-18, HWS-1228, HWS-1229 and selection-2B & varieties JA-20 and RVA-100.
Chemical parameters viz. crude fibre, minerals (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn), starch, total sugars, reducing sugars, non-reducing sugars were analyzed
in ashwagandha roots. Crude fibre content ranged from 17.4 to 37.3 %, Fe content ranged from 595.83 to 983.33 ppm, Cu content ranged
from 8.40 to 13.72 ppm, Zn content ranged from 16.33 to 41.00 ppm and Mn content ranged from 16.80 to 33.46 ppm. Starch, total
sugars, reducing sugars and non-reducing sugars contents ranged from 7.61 to 8.22 mg/g, 5.33 to 6.89 mg/g, 0.40 to 0.64 mg/g and 4.87
to 6.33 mg/g, respectively. Phytochemical parameters viz. total alkaloids and tannins were also analyzed. Total alkaloids and tannins
content ranged from 0.26 to 0.31 % and 0.66 to 0.84 mg/g, respectively.
Keywords: Crude fibre, Minerals, Starch, Total sugars, Reducing sugars, Total alkaloids, Tannins.
Asian Journal of Chemistry; Vol. 29, No. 8 (2017), 1683-1686
chemical composition of ashwagandha roots. Therefore, the
objective of present study was to estimate chemical parameters
viz. crude fibre, minerals (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn), starch, total sugars,
reducing sugars, non-reducing sugars and phytochemical
parameters viz. total alkaloids, tannins in the promising
genotypes of ashwagandha roots.
EXPERIMENTAL
Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L.) roots samples of
promising genotypes (HWS-08-14, HWS-08-18, HWS-1228,
HWS-1229 and Selection-2B) and two varieties (JA-20 and
RVA-100) were procured from the experimental area of Medi-
cinal, Aromatic and Potential Crops Section, Department of
Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana
Agricultural University, Hisar. Roots were shade dried. After
drying, roots were cut into small pieces of 2-3 inches and were
ground. Chemical parameters viz. crude fibre, minerals, starch,
total sugars, reducing sugars, non-reducing sugars and
phytochemical parameters viz. total alkaloids and tannins were
estimated from ashwagandha roots powder.
The commercially available chemicals from Merck, SRL
(SISCO Research Labortories), Qualigens and Sigma-Aldrich,
were used for various experimental procedures.
Estimation of moisture content: Moisture content was
estimated by the standard procedure of AOAC [6].
Estimation of crude fibre: Crude fibre was estimated by
the modified method of Maynard [7]. Two gram of moisture
and fat free powdered sample of ashwagandha roots was weighed
and transferred to the spoutless 1 L beaker and added 200 mL
of 1.25 % (w/v) sulphuric acid. The beaker was then placed
on hot plate and allowed to reflux for 30 min timed from onset
of boiling and the contents were shaked after every 5 min.
After boiling for 30 min beaker was removed from hot plate
and filtered through a muslin cloth using suction. The residue
was washed with hot water till it became free from acid, then
the material was transferred to the same beaker and added
200 mL of 1.25 % NaOH solution and the contents were again
refluxed for 30 min. It was filtered again through muslin cloth
with the help of vacuum or suction pump and the residue was
washed with hot water till it became free from alkali. The
residue was then transferred to a crucible and placed in hot
air oven, allowed to dry to constant weight at 80-110 °C and
recorded its weight. The residue was ignited in muffle furnace
at 550-660 °C for 2-3 h, then cooled and weighed again. The
loss of weight due to ignition is weight of crude fibre.
Weight of crude fibre
Crude fibre content (%) 100
Original weight of sample
=×
Estimation of starch: Starch content was estimated by
the method of McCready et al. [8]. 0.2 g of finally ground
sample of ashwagandha roots was taken in a 50 mL centrifuge
tube for extraction of sugar and starch and added 20 mL of
hot 80 % alcohol. The tubes were then shaked for 5-10 min,
centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. and supernatant was
decanted. The supernatant was free of sugars as judged by
negative test with anthrone reagent. The residue was cooled
in ice water and added 6.5 mL of 52 % perchloric acid while
stirring the contents with a glass rod. It was allowed to stand
for 15 min. with occassional stirring, centrifuged at 4 °C and
supernatant fractions were collected final volume was made
up to 100 mL with water. The above extract was diluted so
that it contains 5-20 µg of glucose per mL. Then 5 mL aliquot
of this diluted extract was taken in tubes and the tubes were
placed in cool water bath and added 10 mL freshly prepared
anthrone reagent, mixed properly and the tubes were trans-
ferred to boiling water bath for 7.5 min. After cooling the tubes
under running tap water the absorbance of these solutions was
noted at 630 nm. A standard curve was prepared using 0 to
100 µg glucose as per the procedure described above and
amount of glucose was calculated in the sample aliquot. Results
were expressed as mg/g on dry weight basis.
Estimation of minerals: Minerals content were estimated
by the method of Jackson [9] and Ruig [10]. 1 g powdered
sample of ashwagandha roots was digested with 15 mL of
diacid mixture (4HNO3:HClO4) in a conical flask by heating
on hot plate in open space till clear white precipitates settled
down at bottom of conical flask. The precipitates were dissol-
ved in 1 % HCl prepared in double glass distilled water, filtered
and final volume of filterate was made up to 50 mL with double
glass distilled water. Results were expressed as ppm on dry
weight basis.
Estimation of total sugars: Total sugars were estimated
by the modified method of Dubois et al. [11]. 1 mL of aqueous
extract was diluted with distilled water to adjust the absorbance
with in calibration limits. Then, 2 mL of phenol solution (2
%, w/v) was added followed by 5 mL concentrated sulphuric
acid. Acid was added in such a way that it directly pours on
the solution. The test tubes were allowed to cool for 30 min
and absorbance of the solution was measured at 490 nm using
UV-visible double beam spectrophotometer Model 2203
(Systronics Co.) against a blank prepared similarly but con-
taining respective solvent instead of extracts. The amount of
total sugars present in the extracts were calculated from the
standard curve and the results are expressed as milligrams per
gram on dry weight basis.
Estimation of reducing sugars: Reducing sugars were
estimated by the method of Nelson [12] as modified by Somogyi
[13]. 1 mL of aqueous extract was diluted with distilled water
to adjust the absorbance with in calibration limits. Then,
1 mL distilled water was added, followed by addition of 1 mL
alkaline copper reagent, solution was mixed, covered with
aluminum foil and heated in boiling water bath for 20 min.
The tubes were cooled to room temperature and 1 mL of
arsenomolybdate reagent was added. The contents were mixed
thoroughly and volume was made up to 10 mL with distilled
water. The absorbance of the solution was measured at 520
nm using UV-visible double beam spectrophotometer Model
2203 (Systronics Co.) against a blank prepared similarly but
containing respective solvents instead of extracts. The amount
of reducing sugars present in the extracts were calculated from
the standard curve and the results are expressed as milligrams
per gram on dry weight basis.
Estimation of non-reducing sugars: The content of non-
reducing sugars was calculated from the difference between
the content of total sugars and that of reducing sugars.
Non-reducing sugars = Total sugars – Reducing sugars
Estimation of total alkaloids: The total alkaloids content
was estimated by the method of Mishra [14]. 1 g of ashwa-
gandha roots powder was weighed and put in stoppered
test tube, then added 10 mL chloroform and three drops of
ammonia, mixed well and kept overnight. Next day after
shaking, the contents were filtered through cotton wool in a
small beaker and the residue was washed with chloroform
thrice (10 mL each), which ensured complete removal of alka-
loids. The extract was dried on water bath and added 10 mL
ethyl alcohol and mixed the contents with clean glass rod.
Then the liquid portion was evaporated which confirms removal
of ammonia and added 10 mL of standard acid solution (0.01
N H2SO4) in the beaker and warmed slightly to dissolve the
alkaloids in acid solution. It was cooled and the unused acid
was titrated with standard NaOH (0.01 N) and note down the
volume of alkali used in titration. A blank was run to find out
the exact volume of acid neutralized by the alkaloids.
Total alkaloid (%) = 0.415 × volume of acid consumed
by alkaloids.
Estimation of tannins: Tannin contents was estimated as
catechin equivalent by vanillin-hydrochloric acid method [15].
200 mg dried plant material was taken in a 50 mL test tube
and 25 mL of methanol was added to it. The tubes were closed
with pith corks. The contents of the tubes were shaken occasio-
1684 Gulati et al. Asian J. Chem.
nally and allowed to stand overnight at 25 to 32 °C. 1 mL of
clear supernatant was then pipetted in a test tube and 5 mL of
vanillin-HCl reagent was added to it. The absorbance of
brownish red colour so produced was measured at 525 nm
after 25 min on a spectronic 20 colorimeter. A blank containing
methanol was also run simultaneously. A standard curve of
catechin was prepared simultaneously in order to calculate
amount of tannin. Results were expressed as mg/g on dry weight
basis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Moisture content: Moisture content in ashwagandha roots
of various genotypes/varieties on fresh weight basis (f.w.b.)
ranged from 6.25 to 7.42 % (Table-1) and it was maximum in
genotype HWS-1228 (7.42 %) followed by HWS-08-18
(7.18 %), Selection-2B (6.83 %), HWS-08-14 (6.34 %) and
HWS-1229 (6.25 %) in comparison to control varieties RVA-
100 (7.27 %) and JA-20 (7.10 %). Our finding is in agreement
with previous investigation which reported 5.54 % moisture
content in ashwagandha root powder [16].
TABLE-1
MOISTURE CONTENTS (%), CRUDE FIBRE (%) AND
STARCH (mg/g) IN ASHWAGANDHA ROOTS OF
VARIOUS GENOTYPES/VARIETIES
Genotypes/varieties
Moisture
content (%)
on f.w.b.
Crude fibre
(%) on d.w.b.
Starch (mg/g)
on d.w.b.
HWS-08-14 6.34 ± 0.19 37.3 ± 0.53 8.00 ± 0.06
HWS-08-18 7.18 ± 0.23 21.5 ± 0.17 8.17 ± 0.03
HWS-1228 7.42 ± 0.26 18.7 ± 0.15 7.61 ± 0.07
HWS-1229 6.25 ± 0.06 23.6 ± 0.09 8.07 ± 0.04
Selection-2B 6.83 ± 0.13 23.0 ± 0.21 7.67 ± 0.12
JA-20 (C) 7.10 ± 0.03 17.4 ± 0.29 7.78 ± 0.09
RVA-100 (C) 7.27 ± 0.09 21.7 ± 0.38 8.22 ± 0.07
Crude fibre: Crude fibre contents in ashwagandha roots
of various genotypes/varieties on dry weight basis (d.w.b.)
ranged from 17.4 to 37.3 % (Table-1) and it was maximum in
genotype HWS-08-14 (37.3 %) followed by HWS-1229
(23.6 %), Selection-2B (23.0 %), HWS-08-18 (21.5 %) and
HWS-1228 (18.7 %) in comparison to control varieties RVA-
100 (21.7 %) and JA-20 (17.4 %). Other research workers
have also reported similar findings. Crude fibre contents ranged
from 22 to 34 % at 150 day after planting and from 32.0 to
38.7 % at 210 day after planting in dry roots of five divergent
accessions of Withania somnifera collected from various
locations in India [5].
Starch: Starch content in ashwagandha roots of various
genotypes/varieties on dry weight basis (d.w.b.) ranged from
7.61 to 8.22 mg/g (Table-1) and it was maximum in genotype
HWS-08-18 (8.17 mg/g) followed by HWS-08-14 (8.00 mg/
g), HWS-1229 (8.07 mg/g), Selection-2B (7.67 mg/g) and
HWS-1228 (7.61 mg/g) in comparison to control varieties
RVA-100 (8.22 mg/g) and JA-20 (7.78 mg/g). Our finding is
in agreement with previous investigation which reported that
starch content varied between 6.09 to 9.46 mg/g in roots of
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal [5].
Minerals (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn) content: Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn
content in ashwagandha roots of various genotypes/varieties
on dry weight basis (d.w.b.) is shown in Table-2. Iron contents
ranged from 529.16 to 983.33 ppm and it was maximum in
genotype HWS-08-18 (983.33 ppm) followed by HWS-1228
(958.33 ppm), HWS-1229 (627.08 ppm), Selection-2B (604.16
ppm) and HWS-08-14 (529.16 ppm) in comparison to control
varieties RVA-100 (795.83 ppm) and JA-20 (595.83 ppm). Cu
content ranged from 8.40 to 13.72 ppm and it was maximum
in genotype HWS-08-18 (13.72 ppm) followed by HWS-08-
14 (12.47 ppm), HWS-1229 (10.88 ppm), HWS-1228 (9.60
ppm) and Selection-2B (9.35 ppm) in comparison to control
varieties RVA-100 (8.77 ppm) and JA-20 (8.40 ppm). Zn
content ranged from 16.33 to 41.00 ppm and it was maximum
in genotype HWS-08-18 (41.00 ppm) followed by HWS-08-
14 (27.33 ppm), HWS-1228 (27.17 ppm), Selection-2B (23.50
ppm) and HWS-1229 (22.67 ppm) in comparison to control
varieties RVA-100 (25.33 ppm) and JA-20 (16.33 ppm). Mn
content ranged from 12.20 to 33.46 ppm and it was maximum
in genotype HWS-08-18 (33.46 ppm) followed by HWS-1228
(25.45 ppm), HWS-1229 (18.98 ppm), Selection-2B (17.52
ppm) and HWS-08-14 (12.20 ppm) in comparison to control
varieties RVA-100 (22.80 ppm) and JA-20 (16.80 ppm). Results
of other research workers showed 35.91 ppm Zn and 12.96
ppm Cu content in dried roots of ashwagandha [17]. Fe, Mn
and Cu content ranged from 280 to 945 ppm, from 15 to 49
ppm and from 14 to 21 ppm, respectively in roots of Withania
somnifera of Sondikola regions and from 349.5 to 602.0 ppm,
19 to 59 ppm and 18 to 42 ppm, respectively in roots of Withania
somnifera of Karthikere regions [18].
TABLE-2
MINERALS (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn) CONTENT (ppm)
IN ASHWAGANDHA ROOTS OF VARIOUS
GENOTYPES/VARIETIES ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
Minerals content (ppm) on dry weight basis Genotypes/
varieties Fe Cu Zn Mn
HWS-08-14 529.16 ±
15.02
12.47 ±
0.69
27.33 ±
0.93
12.20 ±
0.61
HWS-08-18 983.33 ±
45.12
13.72 ±
0.68
41.00 ±
0.50
33.46 ±
0.95
HWS-1228 958.33 ±
37.90
9.60 ±
0.19
27.17 ±
0.83
25.45 ±
0.28
HWS-1229 627.08 ±
27.56
10.88 ±
1.20
22.67 ±
1.01
18.98 ±
0.55
Selection-2B 604.16 ±
11.02
9.35 ±
0.38
23.50 ±
0.50
17.52 ±
0.52
JA-20 (C) 595.83 ±
19.87
8.40 ±
0.38
16.33 ±
0.60
16.80 ±
1.01
RVA-100 (C) 795.83 ±
13.66
8.77 ±
0.16
25.33 ±
1.01
22.80 ±
0.28
Total sugars: Total sugars content in ashwagandha roots
of various genotypes/varieties on dry weight basis (d.w.b.)
ranged from 5.33 to 6.89 mg/g (Table-3) and it was maximum
in genotype HWS-08-18 (6.89 mg/g) followed by HWS-08-
14 (6.82 mg/g), HWS-1228 (6.15 mg/g), HWS-1229 (5.51
mg/g) and Selection-2B (5.33 mg/g) in comparison to control
varieties RVA-100 (5.91 mg/g) and JA-20 (5.83 mg/g). Our
finding is in agreement with previous investigation which
reported that total sugars content varied between 2.52 to 9.72
mg/g in roots of Withania somnifera (L.) [5].
Vol. 29, No. 8 (2017) Chemical and Phytochemical Composition of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L.) Roots 1685
TABLE-3
TOTAL SUGARS (mg/g), REDUCING SUGARS (mg/g) AND NON-
REDUCING SUGARS (mg/g) IN ASHWAGANDHA ROOTS OF
VARIOUS GENOTYPES/VARIETIES ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
Genotypes/
varieties
Total sugars
(mg/g)
Reducing
sugars (mg/g)
Non-reducing
sugars (mg/g)
HWS-08-14 6.82 ± 0.05 0.52 ± 0.04 6.30 ± 0.01
HWS-08-18 6.89 ± 0.04 0.56 ± 0.04 6.33 ± 0.01
HWS-1228 6.15 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.03 5.51 ± 0.02
HWS-1229 5.51 ± 0.06 0.54 ± 0.03 4.97 ± 0.05
Selection-2B 5.33 ± 0.03 0.46 ± 0.02 4.87 ± 0.01
JA-20 (C) 5.83 ± 0.06 0.46 ± 0.01 5.37 ± 0.05
RVA-100 (C) 5.91 ± 0.04 0.40 ± 0.01 5.51 ± 0.03
Reducing sugars: Reducing sugars content in ashwa-
gandha roots of various genotypes/varieties on dry weight basis
(d.w.b.) is shown in Table-3. Reducing sugars content ranged
from 0.40 to 0.64 mg/g and it was maximum in genotype HWS-
1228 (0.64 mg/g) followed by HWS-08-18 (0.56 mg/g), HWS-
1229 (0.54 mg/g), HWS-08-14 (0.52 mg/g) and Selection-2B
(0.46 mg/g) in comparison to control varieties JA-20 (0.46
mg/g) and RVA-100 (0.40 mg/g). Other research workers have
also reported similar findings. Reducing sugars content have
been reported to varied between 0.21 to 2.10 mg/g in roots of
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal [5].
Non-reducing sugars: Non-reducing sugars content in
ashwagandha roots of various genotypes/varieties on dry weight
basis (d.w.b.) is shown in Table-3. It was observed that non-
reducing sugars content ranged from 4.87 to 6.33 mg/g and it
was maximum in genotype HWS-08-18 (6.33 mg/g) followed
by HWS-08-14 (6.30 mg/g), HWS-1228 (5.51 mg/g), HWS-
1229 (4.97 mg/g) and Selection-2B (4.87 mg/g) in comparison
to control varieties RVA-100 (5.51 mg/g) and JA-20 (5.37 mg/g).
Results of other research workers showed that non-reducing
sugars content content varied between 2.33 to 7.62 mg/g in
roots of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal [5].
Total alkaloids: Total alkaloids content in ashwagandha
roots of various genotypes/varieties on dry weight basis (d.w.b.)
is shown in Table-4. Total alkaloids content ranged from 0.26
to 0.31 % and it was maximum in genotype HWS-08-18 (0.31
%) followed by HWS-08-14 (0.30 %), HWS-1229 (0.29 %),
HWS-1228 (0.28 %) and Selection-2B (0.26 %) in comparison
to control varieties RVA-100 (0.26 %) and JA-20 (0.26 %).
Other research workers have also reported similar findings.
Total alkaloids content in Withania somnifera (L.) roots have
been reported to varied between 0.13 to 0.31 % [19].
Tannins: Tannins content in ashwagandha roots of various
genotypes/varieties on dry weight basis (d.w.b.) is also shown
TABLE-4
TOTAL ALKALOIDS (%) AND TANNINS (mg/g)
IN ASHWAGANDHA ROOTS OF VARIOUS
GENOTYPES/VARIETIES ON DRY WEIGHT BASIS
Genotypes/varieties Total alkaloids (%) Tannins (mg/g)
HWS-08-14 0.30 ± 0.01 0.73 ± 0.04
HWS-08-18 0.31 ± 0.00 0.77 ± 0.06
HWS-1228 0.28 ± 0.01 0.84 ± 0.04
HWS-1229 0.29 ± 0.00 0.66 ± 0.06
Selection-2B 0.26 ± 0.01 0.73 ± 0.04
JA-20 (C) 0.26 ± 0.01 0.81 ± 0.04
RVA-100 (C) 0.26 ± 0.01 0.66 ± 0.06
in Table-4. It was observed that tannins content ranged from
0.66 to 0.84 mg/g and it was maximum in genotype HWS-
1228 (0.84 mg/g) followed by HWS-08-18 (0.77 mg/g), HWS-
08-14 (0.73 mg/g), Selection-2B (0.73 mg/g) and HWS-1229
(0.66 mg/g) in comparison to control varieties JA-20 (0.81
mg/g) and RVA-100 (0.66 mg/g). Our finding is in agreement
with previous investigation which reported 0.82 mg/g tannins
content in roots of Poshita variety of Withania somnifera (L.)
under in vivo conditions and 0.39 mg/g under in vitro condi-
tions, respectively [20].
Conclusion
The present study showed that among various genotypes
of Ashwagandha roots, genotypes HWS-08-18 and HWS-1228
were found better in terms of crude fibre, minerals (Fe, Cu,
Zn, Mn), starch, total sugars, reducing sugars, non-reducing
sugars, total alkaloids and tannins.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work is financially supported by the Department of
Science and Technology, New Delhi, India.
REFERENCES
1. A.F. Hill, Economic Botony: A Textbook of Useful Plants and Plant
Products, McGraw Hill Book Company Inc; New York, edn 2, pp. 205
(1952).
2. N. Alam, M. Hossain, M.A. Mottalib, S.A. Sulaiman, S.H. Gan and M.I.
Khalil, BMC Complement. Altern. Med., 12, 1175 (2012);
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-175.
3. N. Alam, M. Hossain, M.I. Khalil, M. Moniruzzaman, S.A. Sulaiman and
S.H. Gan, BMC Complement. Altern. Med., 11, 65 (2011);
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-65.
4. Q. Uddin, L. Samiulla, V.K. Singh and S.S. Jamil, J. Appl. Pharm. Sci.,
2, 170 (2012).
5. P.K. Khanna, A. Kumar, A. Ahuja and M.K. Kaul, Asian J. Plant Sci.,
5, 1061 (2006);
https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2006.1061.1063.
6. AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical
Chemists, Washington, DC, edn 17 (2000).
7. A.J. Maynard, Method in Food Analysis, Academic Press, New York,
pp. 176 (1970).
8. R.M. McCready, J. Guggolz, V. Silviera and H.S. Owens, Anal. Chem.,
22, 1156 (1950);
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60045a016.
9. M.L.C. Jackson, Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt.
Ltd., New Delhi (1973).
10. W.G.D. Ruig, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 69, 1009 (1986).
11. M. DuBois, K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers and F. Smith, Anal.
Chem., 28, 350 (1956);
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017.
12. N. Nelson, J. Biol. Chem., 153, 375 (1944).
13. M. Somogyi, J. Biol. Chem., 195, 19 (1952).
14. S.N. Mishra, Quick Method for Estimation of Total Alkaloid in
Asgandh, In: Biennial Report of All India Coordinated Research Project
on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, NRCM&AP (Anand), pp. 254 (1996).
15. R.E. Burns, Agron. J., 63, 511 (1971);
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1971.00021962006300030050x.
16. A. Rani, N.R. Baranwal and R.K. Nema, Asian J. Biochem. Pharm. Res.,
4, 195 (2012).
17. M. Garg and J. Ravikant, Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 2, 66 (2014).
18. S.R. Krishnamurthy and P. Sarala, E-J. Chem., 7, 985 (2010);
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/616851.
19. S. Johri, U. Jamwal, S. Rasool, A. Kumar, V. Verma and G.N. Qazi,
Plant Sci., 169, 1014 (2005);
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.05.015.
20. M.O. Viji, M.M. Mathew and R. Parvatham, Vistas, 2, 143 (2013).
1686 Gulati et al. Asian J. Chem.