Conference PaperPDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Recent speculative and critical design practices may critique the dominant socio-cultural assumptions of technologies, but often lack diversity and participatory input outside the privileged realm of academic and professional designers. #is paper investigates the process and potential of designing speculative futures with local communities, in order to collectively imagine technology that serves a common good and reinforces local identity. This study reflects on the “Sankofa City” project, a three-month community-university collaboration based in a historically black neighborhood in South Los Angeles. The project utilized design fiction scenario videos and collages to present provocative design concepts to local stakeholder meetings and the general public. This paper analyzes the methodology and outcomes of co-designing emerging technologies (such as augmented reality and self-driving cars) in order to establish “infrastructures of the imagination” for long-term strategies and alternative cultural models of innovation.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Infrastructures of the Imagination: Community Design for
Speculative Urban Technologies
Karl Baumann
University of Southern
California
3470 McClintock Ave
Los Angeles, CA, USA
kbaumann@usc.edu
Benjamin Stokes
American University
4400 Massachuse!s Ave NW
Washington, DC, USA
bstokes@american.edu
François Bar
University of Southern
California
3630 Wa! Way
Los Angeles, CA, USA
"ar@usc.edu
Ben Caldwell
Kaos Network
4343 Leimert Blvd
Los Angeles, CA, USA
bencaldwelllm@aol.com
ABSTRACT
Recent speculative and critical design practices may critique the
dominant socio-cultural assumptions of technologies, but o$en
lack diversity and participatory input outside the privileged
realm of academic and professional designers. %is paper
investigates the process and potential of designing speculative
futures with local communities, in order to collectively imagine
technology that serves a common good and reinforces local
identity. %is study reects on the “Sankofa City”1 project, a
three-month community-university collaboration based in a
historically black neighborhood in South Los Angeles. %e
project utilized design ction scenario videos and collages to
present provocative design concepts to local stakeholder
meetings and the general public. %is paper analyzes the
methodology and outcomes of co-designing emerging
technologies (such as augmented reality and self-driving cars) in
order to establish “infrastructures of the imagination” for long-
term strategies and alternative cultural models of innovation.
CCS CONCEPTS
Participatory Design Field Studies Scenario-based
KEYWORDS
Community-based Design, Speculative Design, Infrastructuring,
Design Fiction, Urban Technology, Autonomous Vehicles, AR
ACM Reference format:
K. Baumann, B. Stokes, F. Bar, and B. Caldwell. 2017. In Proceedings of the
8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '17),
4 pages.
DOI: 10.1145/3083671.3083700
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or
classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or
distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and
the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this
work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).
C&T '17,
June 26-30, 2017, Troyes, France
© 2017 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to
ACM.
ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-4854-6/17/06 $15.00
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3083671.3083700
1 INTRODUCTION
The current population shift toward the urban core in US cities
has created an exciting and delicate time for urban innovation
and design. Attempts to bring new technology can easily
aggravate disparities, undermining local culture and
disproportionately benefiting newcomers. How can community-
based speculative design help to retain cultural values and plan
for the future, especially with technology? Infrastructures of the
imagination is a method to empower local populations to engage
with emerging technologies in their own cultural terms and even
to design potential implementations. By focusing on the
imagination, rather than strictly practical or feasible designs, we
hoped to encourage non-expert participation in the design
process. Rather than trying to fix contemporary problems,
speculative processes use design to push the imagination toward
wholly new sociotechnical systems.
The project here is part of a longer-term collaboration, started in
the South Los Angeles community of Leimert Park - a
neighborhood famous for African-American music and culture,
and where the construction of a new subway line threatens
significant ethnic and population shifts [1]. Within this context,
the authors started The Leimert Phone Company (LPC) in 2012
as a design collaborative, bringing together a university lab and a
community art center. Three of the authors were initially based
at a nearby university while the other author owns and
organizes a community art center. We use rapid-prototyping
workshops to empower community-student groups to imagine
technological interventions in the built environment [2]. While
we initially repurposed familiar urban objects (payphones, bus
benches, newspapers boxes, and community gardens) the
“Sankofa City” project co-designs emerging or yet-to-exist
technologies.
By focusing on speculative technologies, we sought to give
participants a greater sense of imaginative freedom. Our method
used “what if” questions to define parameters and provoke
brainstorming, but the participants determined the designs. They
created a range of concepts in the form of basic prototypes, collages,
and a final design fiction video. Participant groups gravitated
towards certain “what if” conceptual domains over others, revealing
that the methodology was useful for generating designs and also
tracking what did not resonate with local participants and their
desires for the future.
C&T’17, 26-30 June 2017, Troyes, France
K.Baumann et al.
2
The participant groups came up with a wide range of designs: 1.)
self-driving public shuttles that dynamically display local history
along the route, 2.) socially networked shoes that communicate
when nearby friends are having a pop-up event or basketball game,
3.) augmented reality glasses that overlay “deep time” and ancestral
history onto the present, and 4.) a musical park equipped with a
sensor-based public garden that provides food while offering
activities for unemployed youth and the homeless (Figure 1). Each
concept was a synthesis of community participant and university
student collaborations, designed to resonate with local issues and
desires for the future.
Figure 1. Group designs: self-driving shuttles (top left),
networked shoes (top right), interactive garden (bottom
left), and ancestral augmented reality (bottom right).
2 DESIGNING FOR THE COMMONS
Speculative and critical design [3] and design fiction [4] have
emerged in recent years as experimental forms of design that
represent alternative, critical, or yet-to-exist design objects and
interfaces. Bordering on conceptual art and science fiction, the
practices have a strong emphasis on aesthetics, storytelling, and
conceptual provocation. However, speculative and critical design
have been critiqued as a privileged space that is either elitist [5]
or ignores issues of class, race, and gender [6].
One strategy for speculative design would be to ground the work
within a community context, drawing from processes of co-
design and participatory design. Participatory design (PD)
initially emerged in Scandinavia as a method for democratizing
workplaces, but has evolved to engage a wide range of groups
such as elderly, immigrant, and indigenous populations [2,7,8].
By collaborating directly, designers gain a better understanding
of users’ desires and more importantly incorporate
alternative cultural practices and social beliefs into their designs.
The “Sankofa City” project worked with community participants
to define their preferable futures, often tied to local African-
American cultural norms and social practices. Their imagined
futures can present alternatives to dominant techno-cultures,
associated with Silicon Valley [9] or “The California Ideology”
[10], which is characterized as socially progressive while
economically neoliberal, using proprietary techno-systems to
replace traditional government services or organized labor.
In contrast, the Leimert Phone Company (LPC) is driven by an
ethos of developing public technology for the commons.In the
Commonwealth [11], political philosophers Hardt and Negri
argue that urban centers present the most powerful potentials
for establishing the commons through encounters across
different populations, in order to combat the isolation and
individualism of neoliberalist socio-economic practices.
The LPC process of design is based on deliberate encounters, or
contact zones [8], particularly between outsiders and local
residents. As the new subway will connect Leimert Park to the
rest of the city, there will inevitably be an influx of outside
populations. Rather than be defensive or self-victimizing, our
projects seek to create public technologies that facilitate
meaningful encounters or direct outsiders to engage with local
cultural history and institutions. We have previously created a
constellation [12] of designs around contact zones, while
developing long-term strategies for capacity building and
sustainable growth.
3 SPECULATIVE COMMUNITY PROCESS
The “Sankofa City” project teamed USC students with local
residents, musicians, and artists. All workshops took place at the
Kaos Network art center in Leimert Park, with another workshop at
the USC film school’s green screen stage to shoot a design fiction
video. The workshops were run as an experimental course,
facilitated by the first author, who is a USC PhD student, and the
fourth author, who owns and operates the art center. Workshops
met for twelve weeks, with a final public presentation at the end.
The size varied from week to week, peaking at 16 participants in the
early weeks. We had 4 regular students, 2 occasional students, 2-9
community participants, and 2-4 organizers. One unexpected
participant/organizer was a design graduate student, who is
developing public autonomous-shuttles. A wide range of guest
speakers were also invited, including urban planners, local
historians, an AR designer, a critical race professor, a game designer,
a media theorist, and a multimedia designer.
The process included 3 phases, plus a final exhibition:
1.) Brainstorminghigh level concepts organized around
“what if” hypothetical questions and systematic imagining
of the neighborhood. Groups rotated weekly.
2.) Prototypinggroups solidify to create personas and
prototypes (wearables and urban objects) engaging the
larger systematic concepts.
3.) Design Fictionsdesigns and personas synthesize into
scenarios to create design fiction collages and a video.
4.) Presentationgroups present their collages and videos to
a local planning committee of stakeholders.
This process began with a broad set of ideas and then syphoned
down to a more focused set of particular designs, personas, and
Infrastructures of the Imagination: Community Design for
Speculative Urban Technologies
C&T’17, 26-30 June 2017, Troyes, France
scenario collages/videos. Throughout the process, we intentionally
balanced futurist provocations with local history and existing urban
forms, as well as systemic approaches with human-centric design
perspectives.
3.1 Speculative “what if” questions
To envision the future, we used hypothetical “what if” questions
to guide the process, acting as provocations [3] to trigger the
participants’ imagination while creating an infrastructure for
collaborative brainstorming. Rather than completely open-ended
questions, workshops benefit from thematic constraints to focus
designs and keep them from traveling into the purely fantastical.
The questions ranged from socializing new technology (like self-
driving cars) to more structural issues (like sustainable
gardening and no private property). Augmented reality was also
offered as a personal technology relevant to all groups. Below
are the provocations listed from specific to general:
1. Autonomous Vehicles: What if self-driving shuttles
replaced privately owned vehicles?
2. City as Instrument: What if the city could be played
like a musical instrument?
3. Gardening Community: What if the city was built
around community gardening/farming?
4. No Private Property: What if there was no private
property and no policing?
The questions were created by the organizers, based on our
community partner’s (fourth author’s) insights into ongoing
issues within the community and Los Angeles generally (Table
1). As Dunne and Raby point out, the benefit of speculative
design is to tackle wicked problems that plague society or design
thinking [3]. By suspending our beliefs in contemporary
solutions, we are able to collectively search for novel solutions
and inventions.
What if?
Issues and Concerns
Autonomous Vehicles
Traffic, pa rk ing, and attention
City as Musical Instrument
Cultural heritage and engagement
Garden Community
Sustainability and
Healthy food options
No Private Property
Homelessness, affordability
and policing
Table 1: “What if” prompts related to local and wicked
problems.
3.2 Initial Outcomes and Issues
As groups synthesized their designs, there was a noticeable gap
in which “what if” questions stuck and which slipped away. For
example, ideas generated from the No Private Property group
were not present by the fourth week. This may indicate that the
prompt was too open or systematically complex. While City as
Musical Instrument and Garden Community were not tied to one
single technology, they immediately conjured up design objects.
Participants could quickly grasp urban furniture, musical
instruments, and urban farming. In contrast, No Private Property
appeared too abstract and required a more drastic leap away
from our current property-based economic system. In trying to
tackle economic issues as well as homelessness and policing, the
concept proved too vast and slippery for the allotted workshop
time.
While No Private Property was an explicit prompt for creating
the commons,” the other questions intuitively generated
alternative forms of property. The Gardening Community group
imagined collective urban farms that functioned through shared
labor, training programs (for unemployed youth or homeless),
and non-monetary exchange. The Autonomous Vehicles group
imagined self-driving shuttles as shared work spaces, and the
City as Instrument group imagined interactive musical parks for
public collaboration. So rather than introduce the “commons”
concept from the top-down, groups organically imagined designs
that modeled socio-technical systems for the common good.
3.3 Infrastructures of the Imagination
Throughout the workshops, it was invaluable to re-present
previous week’s work and develop a shared vocabulary. Even at
the stage of brainstorming and paper prototyping, technology
can be conceptually challenging. As new community participants
rotated in, some were alienated by casual uses of design jargon
or technological terms (like “augmented reality”). It was a crucial
lesson for infrastructuring [2] as we sought to empower
participants to understand emerging speculative technologies.
As Kafai et al. argue, community-based technology education
programs cannot simply focus on technical literacy but must also
emphasize normative dimensions of long-term cultural adoption
[13]. One novel approach from an older (and highly dedicated)
participant, was to imagine augmented reality overlays as a tool
for seeing ancestral temporalities within the present world. By
pairing his spiritual beliefs with the technology, he found a more
meaningful cultural engagement. Beyond technical literacy,
infrastructures of the imagination establish conceptual frames
that merge speculative design thinking with local worldviews.
4 SCENARIOS FROM THE FUTURE
After four weeks of rotating groups to cross-pollinate ideas, we
finalized groups to create personas, prototypes, and scenarios.
4.1 Personas and Contact Zones
Groups created personas to focus on individual users and ground
designs in the community experience [4]. Indeed, two personas
were directly inspired by the community participants, essentially
writing themselves into the future. Groups also created
C&T’17, 26-30 June 2017, Troyes, France
K.Baumann et al.
4
“outsider” personas, since the neighborhood is focused on
cultural preservation in the face of rapid urban development.
Teams thus designed around encounters or contact zones [8] -
meeting points of difference across professional, ethnic,
geographic, and class identities - to tie their designs to the larger
civic complexity of their neighborhood and to create urban
“commons” [11].
4.2 Rapid-Prototyping and Scenarios
Workshops strategically alternated between top-down systemic
perspectives and bottom-up human centric designs. One week,
groups created future neighborhood models out of foam, plastic,
and wood. Another week, participants prototyped augmented
reality glasses and wearable tech (Figure 2). Shifting between the
systemic and the human-centric fostered conversations and
designs that could create an ecosystem of modular and
interrelated activities. Each individual design object was not an
isolated element, but were Things [7], i.e, socio-material
assemblages that generated relationships between people and
places.
Figure 2. Neighborhood design (left), brainstorming (top
right) and rapid-prototyping wearables (bottom right).
For public presentation, groups created scenarios [14] that
synthesized their personas and urban technologies. They created
visual collages of a day-in-the-life in their future neighborhood,
often interweaving multiple scenarios to show the modularity of
their concepts. For example, the garden based design (Figure 1)
represented 1.) an interactive musical fountain to activate the
local park, 2.) maintaining the continuing presence of drum
circles, and 3.) a community garden that has sensors to keep
track of water levels. The autonomous vehicle group showed 1.)
vehicles could have AR history tours for visitors, 2.) paratransit
for local families, and 3.) drones to trade produce across
neighborhoods.
4.3 Design Fiction Video
In each of our previous LPC community design projects, we have
used “design fiction videos” [4] to utilize the power of movie
making (echoing science fiction) to visualize our speculative
designs. For this project, we went a step further to use 3D
modeling and visual effects (VFX) to present designs that we
could not build. The video represented the experience of a visitor
driving through Leimert Park and becoming enraptured by the
rich local musical history and architecture.
4 PUBLIC PRESENTATION
Community is never singular, but is multi-dimensional, much as
many PD theorists have adopted Dewey’s term publics [7]. The
final outcome of our workshop series was a public presentation
at a local stakeholders and planning group. Our participants
presented 7 collages and their final video to provoke dialogue
about long-term strategies for developing new technologies. The
video was particularly effective in bringing the designs to life
and incorporating local archival music footage. Community
members said that they were “inspired” and asked to join future
workshop series. The organizer claimed it was “the rst time I’ve
seen [the university] do something signicant…where urban
planning and community values and taste are brought together.”
His statement spoke to an appreciation of the process and not
just the designs.
5 CONCLUSION
By working with communities directly, speculative design can
expand its methodological horizons and empower groups to
imagine alternative future solutions to “wicked problems.”
Focusing on imaginative possibilities, prompted by “what if?”
questions, frees participants to explore ideas and connections,
with less deference to expert contributions. Long-term
envisioning can also suggest more immediate planning strategies
that support the commons.” But formal and conceptual
unknowns can be alienating and require infrastructuring to
create shared vocabularies tied to local worldviews. Video is
particularly powerful for visualizing the more nebulous concepts
and for additional community recruitment. While the project
received positive feedback, the direct effect on local planning is
yet to be seen. This project demonstrates and advances our
understanding of infrastructures of the imagination that empower
local communities to develop future designs, concepts, and
strategies that are in line with their local culture and future
trajectory.
REFERENCES
[1]
E. A. Kaplan. 2013. Leimert Park: Where does it go from here? Departures.
KCET. Retrieved December 3, 2013.
[2]
Karasti, H. Infrastructuring in participatory design. Proceedings of the 13th
Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers-Volume 1, ACM (2014),
141-150.
[3]
Dunne, A. and Raby, F. 2013. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social
dreaming. MIT Press.
[4]
Mark Blythe. 2014. Research through design fiction: narrative in real and
imaginary abstracts. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors
in Computing Systems, ACM, 703712.
[5]
Simon Bowen. 2010. Critical theory and participatory design. Proceedings of
CHI, Citeseer.
[6]
Luiza Prado de O. Martins. 2014. Privilege and oppression: Towards a feminist
speculative design. Proceedings of DRS 2014: Design’s big debates: 980990.
[7]
Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., and Hillgren, P.-A. Agonistic participatory design:
working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign 8, (2012), 127-144.
[8]
Sabiescu, A.G., David, S., van Zyl, I., and Cantoni, L. Emerging spaces in
community-based participatory design: reflections from two case studies.
Infrastructures of the Imagination: Community Design for
Speculative Urban Technologies
C&T’17, 26-30 June 2017, Troyes, France
Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers-
Volume 1, ACM (2014), 110.
[9]
Herman Gray. 2005. Cultural moves: African Americans and the politics of
representation. Univ of California Press.
[10]
Marc Tuters and Kazys Varnelis. 2006. Beyond locative media: Giving shape
to the internet of things. Leonardo 39, 4: 357363.
[11]
Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt. 2009. Commonwealth. Harvard Univ Press.
[12]
Baumann, K., Stokes, B., Bar, F., and Caldwell, B. 2016. Designing in
constellations: sustaining participatory design for neighborhoods. Proceedings
of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive
Exhibitions, Workshops-Volume 2, ACM, 58.
[13]
Kafai, Y.B., Peppler, K.A., and Chiu, G.M. 2007. High tech programmers in
low-income communities: Creating a computer culture in a community
technology center. In Communities and Technologies 2007. Springer, 545563.
[14]
Howard, S., Carroll, J., Murphy, J., and Peck, J. Usingendowed props’ in
scenario-based design. Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on
Human-computer interaction, ACM (2002), 110.
... Moreover, the provision of backdrop has been found useful for participants to take a leap from the present, enter the fictional world, and get sensitised with the futuristic ambiance. For instance, in Baumann et al.'s [4] co-design project of envisioning future neighbourhood with urban technologies, researchers carefully embedded design brief in 'what if' prompts for participants, like 'what if self-driving shuttles replaced privately owned vehicles?'. Another strategy is seen in Wu et al.'s [62] work which envisions a future of autonomous shipping in 2035. ...
... The two social settings provided in Step 1 were to facilitate participants to enter the future world with the provision of backdrop [4]. And the plot structure took the common fictional structure of 'overcoming a monster' [7] with both elements of 'goal/problem' and 'actions/solutions'. ...
Full-text available
Preprint
The creation process of design fiction is going participatory and inclusive with non experts. Recognizing the potential of artificial intelligence in creativity support, we explore the use of AI assistance in creating design fiction. This investigation is based on a workshop on future work in 2040 with Chinese youth. We look into fiction quality, participants experiences with the AI agent, and their ways of incorporating those texts into writing. Our findings show that human writers while responding to messy and unexpected AI-generated texts, can elevate the richness and creativity in writing and initiate joyful and inspirational interactions. Furthermore, for the design of AI assistance in creativity support, we suggest two implications of enhancing interactional quality between human and AI and prompt programming. Our study indicates the potential of applying design fiction outside the design context using a more inclusive approach for future speculation with critical reflection on technology.
Full-text available
Article
This paper reflects on the uses of prototypes in "Research through Design" and considers "Design Fiction" as a technique for exploring the potential value of new design work. It begins with an analysis of Research through Design abstracts in the ACM digital library and identifies an emerging language and structure of papers in this emerging field. The abstracts: frame a problem space, introduce a study, often involving the deployment of a prototype, and conclude with considerations, reflections and discussion. This format is then pastiched in a series of design fictions written for a project investigating new and emerging forms of reproduction in Art. The fictions take the form of "imaginary abstracts" which summarize findings of papers that have not been written about prototypes that do not exist. It is argued that framing concept designs as fictional studies can provide a space for research focused critique and development.
Full-text available
Conference Paper
This paper reviews literature and reflects on infrastructuring in Participatory Design (PD) with a conceptual interest. It starts with the notion of information infrastructure introduced to the PD community in the mid-1990s by Star and collaborators. It traces how the notion has been adapted, appended, and negotiated within a number of PD approaches known as “infrastructuring.” Based on this review, the paper discusses a number of themes arising from these approaches that relate to salient information infrastructure characteristics and speak to the specificity of infrastructuring in PD. This paper takes stock of what has happened in conceptual terms with regard to information infrastructure and infrastructuring in the field of PD to inform continuing work.
Full-text available
Article
Participatory design (PD) has become increasingly engaged in public spheres and everyday life and is no longer solely concerned with the workplace. This is not only a shift from work-oriented productive activities to leisure and pleasurable engagements, but also a new milieu for production and ‘innovation’. What ‘democratic innovation’ entails is often currently defined by management and innovation research, which claims that innovation has been democratised through easy access to production tools and lead-users as the new experts driving innovation. We sketch an alternative ‘innovation’ practice more in line with the original visions of PD based on our experience of running Malmö Living Labs – an open innovation milieu where new constellations, issues and ideas evolve from bottom–up long-term collaborations among diverse stakeholders. Three cases and controversial matters of concern are discussed. The fruitfulness of the concepts ‘agonistic public spaces’ (as opposed to consensual decision-making), ‘thinging’ and ‘infrastructuring’ (as opposed to projects) are explored in relation to democracy, innovation and other future-making practices.
Full-text available
Chapter
For the last twenty years, issues of the digital divide have driven efforts around the world to address the lack of access to computers and the Internet, pertinent and language appropriate content, and technical skills in low-income communities (Schuler & Day, 2004a and b). The title of our paper makes reference to a milestone publication (Schon, Sanyal, & Mitchell, 1998) that showcased some of the early work and thinking in this area. Schon, Sanyal and Mitchell’s book edition included an article outlining the Computer Clubhouse, a type of community technology center model, which was developed to create opportunities for youth in low-income communities to become creators and designers of technologies by (1998). The model has been very successful scaling up, with over 110 Computer Clubhouses now in existence worldwide.
Book
Herman Gray takes a sweeping look at black popular culture over the past decade to explore culture's role in the push for black political power and social recognition. In a series of linked essays, he finds that black artists, scholars, musicians, and others have been instrumental in reconfiguring social and cultural life in the United States and he provocatively asks how black culture can now move beyond a preoccupation with inclusion and representation. Gray considers how Wynton Marsalis and his creation of a jazz canon at Lincoln Center acted to establish cultural visibility and legitimacy for jazz. Other essays address such topics as the work of the controversial artist Kara Walker; the relentless struggles for representation on network television when those networks are no longer the primary site of black or any other identity; and how black musicians such as Steve Coleman and George Lewis are using new technology to shape and extend black musical traditions and cultural identities.
Article
Sustaining participation in design is difficult, especially in neighborhoods that seek change consistent with their cultural values. Participatory Design offers several approaches (e.g. infrastructuring) that help to balance the sensibilities of urban planning with the immediacies of design. This paper investigates the distinctive value of a "constellation" of participatory activities that sustained engagement throughout the design of an urban plaza, combining physical and digital flows. Based on a three-year collaboration in a historically black South LA neighborhood, this study analyzes the re-invention of urban furniture – payphones, bus benches, newspaper boxes, planters, and public displays – into community interactions. After reviewing the concrete vision of this constellation, the City of Los Angeles decided to fund the implementation of a pedestrian plaza. This paper articulates our methods of infrastructuring, providing techniques that sustain participation over time around physical urban objects that become touch points for fluid groups of designers. More than any one design, the constellation approach provides a platform for horizontal iteration, maintaining focus and participation in imagining a neighborhood's socio-technical future.
Book
Today designers often focus on making technology easy to use, sexy, and consumable. In "Speculative Everything," Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby propose a kind of design that is used as a tool to create not only things but ideas. For them, design is a means of speculating about how things could be -- to imagine possible futures. This is not the usual sort of predicting or forecasting, spotting trends and extrapolating; these kinds of predictions have been proven wrong, again and again. Instead, Dunne and Raby pose "what if" questions that are intended to open debate and discussion about the kind of future people want (and do not want). "Speculative Everything" offers a tour through an emerging cultural landscape of design ideas, ideals, and approaches. Dunne and Raby cite examples from their own design and teaching and from other projects from fine art, design, architecture, cinema, and photography. They also draw on futurology, political theory, the philosophy of technology, and literary fiction. They show us, for example, ideas for a solar kitchen restaurant; a flypaper robotic clock; a menstruation machine; a cloud-seeding truck; a phantom-limb sensation recorder; and devices for food foraging that use the tools of synthetic biology. Dunne and Raby contend that if we speculate more -- about everything -- reality will become more malleable. The ideas freed by speculative design increase the odds of achieving desirable futures. © 2013 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved.
Conference Paper
This paper engages with issues of universality and locality in the context of community-based participatory design (PD), and focuses on the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating local views and forms of participation in the design process. The notion of 'designing for participation' is advanced as a quintessential perspective for approaches in which design practices are re-configured from a community-centric standpoint. Building on insights from PD and community development studies, as well as on empirical evidence from two community design studies, we argue that designing for participation appears to be located in a space between the designer's and local views of participation, which are at times both ambiguous and conflicting. To overcome these tensions, we argue for the importance of engaging critically and reflectively with PD in community contexts, and in this process capitalising on disciplinary dialogues that can expand the viewpoint from which PD projects are negotiated and evaluated.
Article
Locative media has been attacked for being too eager to appeal to commercial interests as well as for its reliance on Cartesian mapping systems. If these critiques are well founded, however, they are also nostalgic, invoking a notion of art as autonomous from the circuits of mass communication technologies, which the authors argue no longer holds true. This essay begins with a survey of the development of locative media, how it has distanced itself from net art and how it has been critically received, before going on to address these critiques and ponder how the field might develop.