ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

p>Ecotourism gives priority to ecological resource integrity, environmental conservation, community development and economic development by maintaining low-impact and non-consumptive use of local resources. There are different forms of ecotourism developed worldwide as community based ecotourism, ecosystem ecotourism, cultural ecotourism, nature based ecosystem, protected area ecotourism and rural ecotourism. It focuses on meeting three concurrent goals of biodiversity conservation, poverty reduction and business viability using sustainable principles and practices. In sustainable ecotourism, local government officials, local communities, NGOs, private sector and management committee had a great role for tourism development and maintaining healthy cooperation and coordination. Ecotourism had more beneficial impacts compared to adverse impacts on the environment, society and culture. It emphasizes the protection of natural resources, biological diversity and sustainability of resource. It increases mobility of people, social stability and harmony; strengthen traditional culture, hospitality and folkway; and decreases political conflicts. Economic benefits from ecotourism include direct employment in hotels, lodges, tourist restaurants, and tourist chauff euring. It is an integral part of the master development strategy of a developing nation. In Nepal, ecotourism helps to enhance forest cover, flora, fauna, greenery, alternative energy sources, natural resource, biodiversity and other environmental benefits. It had helped in controlling antisocial activities, conserving religious and cultural heritage, maintaining peace and prosperity and increase in cooperation of people with religious beliefs and religious tolerance. It had a great role in poverty alleviation, rural development, agricultural transformation, community enrichment and social empowerment of women in Nepal. In the early stage of ecotourism development, it is difficult to have adequate private agencies and local people involved in delivering lodging, fooding, tour management and tourism activities during peak visitation season. There is need of training on nature guiding, cooking, sustainable use of tourism resources, proper handling of tourism demands, expertise in park management and finance management. THE GAZE JOURNAL OF TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY Vol. 8 No.1 Year 2017, page: 1-19</p
Ecotourism in Nepal
Anup K. C.*
Abstract
Ecotourism gives priority to ecological resource integrity, environmental
conservation, community development and economic development by
maintaining low-impact and non-consumptive use of local resources.
ere are di erent forms of ecotourism developed worldwide as
community based ecotourism, ecosystem ecotourism, cultural ecotourism,
nature based ecosystem, protected area ecotourism and rural ecotourism.
It focuses on meeting three concurrent goals of biodiversity conservation,
poverty reduction and business viability using sustainable principles
and practices. In sustainable ecotourism, local government o cials,
local communities, NGOs, private sector and management committee
had a great role for tourism development and maintaining healthy
cooperation and coordination. Ecotourism had more bene cial impacts
compared to adverse impacts on the environment, society and culture. It
emphasizes the protection of natural resources, biological diversity and
sustainability of resource. It increases mobility of people, social stability
and harmony; strengthen traditional culture, hospitality and folkway;
and decreases political con icts. Economic bene ts from ecotourism
include direct employment in hotels, lodges, tourist restaurants, and
tourist chau euring. It is an integral part of the master development
strategy of a developing nation. In Nepal, ecotourism helps to enhance
forest cover,  ora, fauna, greenery, alternative energy sources, natural
resource, biodiversity and other environmental bene ts. It had helped
in controlling antisocial activities, conserving religious and cultural
heritage, maintaining peace and prosperity and increase in cooperation
of people with religious beliefs and religious tolerance. It had a great role
in poverty alleviation, rural development, agricultural transformation,
community enrichment and social empowerment of women in Nepal. In
the early stage of ecotourism development, it is di cult to have adequate
private agencies and local people involved in delivering lodging, fooding,
tour management and tourism activities during peak visitation season.
* Anup K.C. is an eminent scholar who has already published several research articles on tourism, climate change,
ecology and environment in International Journals. Currently he is working at Nepal Electricity Authority,
Environment and Social Studies Department, Kharipati, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Email:kcanup04@gmail.com
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)2
ere is need of training on nature guiding, cooking, sustainable use of
tourism resources, proper handling of tourism demands, expertise in
park management and  nance management.
Keywords: Ecotourism, Environmental Impacts, Social Impacts,
Economic Impacts, Nepal
Introduction of Ecotourism
Ecotourism is one of the important branches of the sustainable tourism industry
which focuses on biodiversity conservation, environmental protection, poverty
alleviation and economic development (Du y, 2008; K. C., 2016; K.C., Rijal, &
Sapkota, 2015). Among the di erent types of tourism industry, ecotourism protects
and conserves natural resources by providing employment to the people (K.C. &
apa Parajuli, 2014b). It gives priority to ecological resource integrity, environmental
conservation, community development and economic development by maintaining
low-impact and non-consumptive use of local resources (Stem, Lassoie, Lee, &
Deshler, 2003).  ere is need of accessibility, liberalization, community empowerment,
tourism facilities, tourism products, basic accommodation and public participation
(Du y, 2008; Gurung & Scholz, 2008).
Di erent experts and organizations have di erent views on ecotourism. It is also
di ering according to the location, special characteristics of the region, and facilities
of ecotourism and nature of activities o ered by ecotourism entrepreneurs. Winter
sports tourism in snowy mountain is important component of local and national
tax revenue in some countries, trekking and mountaineering tourism is important
in other mountainous countries, recreational activities near the sea is important in
the countries connected with oceans, cultural tours and visit is famous in cultural
heritage rich countries and site visit is important in naturally and ecologically rich
countries. Tourism can be promoted in arti cially and naturally developed area while
ecotourism is more successful in naturally developed areas.
Ecosystem ecotourism integrates sustainable development with ecosystem
structures and functions by managing biological diversity in relation to tourism
experience for absorbing or adapting the pressures of tourists (Tyler & Danger eld,
1999). Rural ecotourism takes place in rural environment with rural resources showing
rurality, traditional culture, agricultural sightseeing, farming experience and rural
accommodations and entertainment (Degang & Xiaoting, 2006). Cultural ecotourism
focuses on cultural traditions, life of local communities, minority cultures and cultural
traditions (Genzong, Penghua, & Shaoxia, 2007). Nature-based ecotourism focuses on
natural resources in parks and protected areas and environment quality (Eagles, 2002).
Ecotourism is an alternative form of tourism which enhances tourism in
the biophysical environment and supports ecologically sustainable activities,
3K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
conservation supporting measures and involvement of local communities (Dowling,
2000; K. C., 2016). It also focuses on community development, poverty alleviation,
wildlife conservation, environmental protection and traditional economic bases like
agriculture, livestock and hunting (Du y, 2008). It supports job, market, culture,
ownership, management, coordination, wildlife conservation and equitable sharing
of bene ts in the local area (Sindiga, 1999). Sustainable principles and practices are
supported by ful lling goals of biodiversity conservation and poverty reduction; and
by maintaining national standards of atmospheric quality, sound quality, drinking
water and sewage (Degang & Xiaoting, 2006; Hawkins, 2004).
Ecotourism focuses on responsible travel to natural areas by conserving
environment, improving well-being of local people, travelling to natural areas,
minimizing impact, building environmental awareness, and providing direct
nancial bene ts, empowerment for local people and respects to their local culture
(Honey, 2008). It prioritizes tourism industry with sustainable development goals
of conserving nature, bene ting local people and educating tourists towards
sustainability. Government, nongovernmental organizations, local communities and
businessman should be involved to manage tourist with proper guideline, certi cation
and regulations. It creates innovative activities to attract visitors, provide opportunity
to interact with nature and helps to conserve  ora and fauna (Wood, 2002).
Responsible ecotourism include those activities to minimize the negative aspects
of conventional tourism on the environment and enhance the cultural integrity of
local people. In addition to evaluating environmental and cultural factors, ecotourism
involves promotion of recycling, energy e ciency, water conservation, and creation of
economic opportunities for local communities (Randall, 1987). According to Ceballos
Lascurain (1996), “Ecotourism is de ned as travelling to relatively undisturbed natural
areas with speci c objective of studying, admiring and enjoying scenery and its wild
animals and plants as well as existing cultural assets found in these areas”.
Ecotourism is environmentally responsible travel and visit to undisturbed
natural areas for enjoyment and appreciation of nature that promotes conservation
with low visitors impacts and active socio-economic involvement of local
population (Ceballos-Lascurain, 1996). It supports biodiversity conservation, local
development, job employment, market for local products and encourages cultural
sensitivity in guest-host relations. Direct bene t sharing and planning is minimal to
integrate national tourism objectives with local needs to landowners. It is taken as
a catalyst for encouraging ecologically sustainable development with a harmonious
relationship with nature, local communities, their cultures and customs (Sindiga,
1999). Ecotourism contribute greatly towards Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for
developing countries like Nepal which are rich in natural environment and culture
(Amati, 2013; UNEP, 2013).
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)4
Principle of Ecotourism
Ecotourism focuses on meeting three concurrent goals using sustainable
principles and practices: (1) biodiversity conservation through protection of natural
and cultural resources; (2) poverty reduction through small and medium size
enterprise development, job creation, and social equity measures; and (3) business
viability through access to capital, return on investment and pro tability. Growing
environmental awareness and advances in transportation and communication has
made ecotourism one of the fastest-growing segments in the travel industry. Equity
investments and  nancial facilities are essential for the development of ecotourism-
related businesses in protected areas. Strategic planning,  nancial analysis, technical
assistance and business plan development are also needed to create entrepreneurial-
driven sustainable development and to improve the quality and viability of ecotourism
(Hawkins, 2004).
e principle of ecotourism minimizes impacts of tourism, builds environmental
and cultural awareness and provides positive experiences to visitors and hosts.
It provides direct  nancial bene ts for conservation and helps in upli ment of
society. It raises sensitivity of the host country’s political, environmental and social
issues and supports international human rights and labor agreements (TIES, 1990).
Ecotourism involves education and interpretation of natural environment to manage
it in an ecologically sustainable way. It is labor intensive and o ers a variety of small
scale opportunities creating jobs for poor, women, and young people, and jobs for
indigenous community. It takes care of natural resources and helps to earn money
through tourism enterprise to better their lives. It involves conservation, business
enterprise and community development with the help of direct and indirect
participants and bene ciaries (Das & Syiemlieh, 2009).
Ecotourism creates sustainable economic development through conservation
objectives and balances the con icting goals of economic development and
biodiversity conservation. It is the sector of the larger tourism industry focusing on
bringing bene ts to local communities and protecting natural areas. Development
of ecotourism makes biodiversity conservation economically viable for local
communities. Additional sources of income from ecotourism come from sale of
traditional handicra s and agricultural products. National and international level
coordination is important for the sustainability of ecotourism projects. Multiple
government departments, including ministries of tourism, natural resources and rural
development coordinates policies and programs to pursue the success of ecotourism
projects. International organizations which provide support to ecotourism projects
should coordinate with government agencies and local non-pro ts (Cusack & Dixon,
2006).
5K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
Ecotourism is one of the preferred tools for conservation and community
development in rural areas. It depends on the potential to provide local economic
bene ts by maintaining ecological resource integrity through low-impact and non-
consumptive use of local resources. Successful ecotourism initiatives get higher
number of tourists and they solve problems of solid waste generation, habitat
disturbance, and trail erosion. Such impacts could seriously threaten the resources
upon which ecotourism depends. Ecotourism provides local economic bene ts by
maintaining ecological resource integrity through low-impact and non-consumptive
resource use. It  nancially supports protected areas through tourism-related park
fees (Stem, et al., 2003).
Di erent Forms of Ecotourism
ere are di erent forms of ecotourism named according to the nature, context
and practices of ecotourism.  ey are named di erently according to the types, place
and characteristics of ecotourism followed in the particular region.
Community Based Ecotourism
Local income, biodiversity conservation and cultural preservation are necessary
for community based ecotourism (CBE) promotion in remote areas. Successful
implementation of CBE project requires improvement of accessibility, liberalization
of pricing policy, community empowerment, and development of tourism facilities
and incorporation of nature-based tourism products. To increase social, economic
and environmental bene ts, tourism development in protected areas should focus
on interdisciplinary and interdepartmental e ort with collaboration between the
conservation and tourism authorities (Gurung & Scholz, 2008).
Ecological sustainability and local community development is focused in
community-based ecotourism. Environmental sensitivity and responsibility promoted
by ecotourism provide political, economic and social bene t to host communities.
Community-based ecotourism requires local employment and bene ts through local
initiation and control. It enhances social status, mobility, social cohesion, harmony
and ecological sustainability. Environmental sensitivity and responsibility promoted
by ecotourism can serve political, economic, social and environmental interests
of host communities.  e relationship between community based ecotourism and
empowerment is complex and incomplete, and the economic and psychological
empowerment of individuals is attained by political and social empowerment of
communities (Kontogeorgopoulos, 2005).
Ecotourism o ers both the service and experience. Historic places and parks
provide emotional experience and psychological benefits to ecotourist (Chan &
Baum, 2007). It supplies real experiences of natural environment and the whole
ecosystem (Tyler & Danger eld, 1999). Ecotourism experiences include seeing
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)6
wildlife in its natural habitat and preservation of natural environment, enjoying
basic accommodation and facilities and acquiring knowledge about nature and the
environment (Chan & Baum, 2007).  e attractive and beautiful scenery of snowy
mountains, green hills, lakes, rivers and forest makes the ecotourist feels like the real
experience of heaven.  e melodious sound of bird, insects and wild animals in the
wilderness area provides spiritual sensation to every people.
Ecosystem Ecotourism
Ecosystem includes living organisms, physical environment and their
interactions and feedbacks.  e herbivory, predation, parasitism and mutualism
between biotic and abiotic components provide basic components in ecosystem
tourism. Ecosystem tourism is supply led tourism strategy with the central theme
of ecosystem integrity enabling sustainable development. It does not exclude
tourist and commercial exploitation of the ecosystem. It depends on integrated
management philosophy considering bene ciaries, socioeconomic constraints and
impacts on the resource base within a realistic spatial and temporal scale. It requires
entire ecosystems or the biological diversity managed in relation to the tourism
experience. (Tyler & Danger eld, 1999). In this type of ecotourism, activities
are focused in such a way that helps to maintain the structures and functions of
ecosystem.
Rural Ecotourism
Rural ecotourism promotes the combination between agriculture and tourism,
enhances the pro ts from agriculture and provides peasantry with more pro t,
more employment opportunities and better living conditions. It plays a positive
role in prompting the development of rural economy and rural culture through
agricultural sightseeing and experience with traditional accommodations and
simple entertainment. Rural tourism was originated in Europe to develop tourism
in a sustainable way with rural environment, rural re ections, and agricultural
products as a source of tourist attractions, peasantry life style and traditional folk
custom. It takes place in rural environment based on the available resources of
rural scenario. In rural tourism, tourists enjoy staying in the yard, strolling and
looking around  owers, green plants, gardens, old architecture and by playing
cards or mahjong.  ere are few packing houses, butchers and packmen, distance
carriers and souvenir shop which provide service to the tourist in the form of chefs,
waiters and o ce boys. It generates second revenue for the local villagers with the
help of traditional hospitality, honest folkway and environmental conservation.
Atmospheric quality, sound quality, drinking water, sewage, lampblack and all
kinds of resources meet the national standards of environmental conservation
(Degang & Xiaoting, 2006).
7K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
Sustainable Ecotourism
In sustainable ecotourism, local government o cials, local communities,
NGOs, private sector and management committee had a great role for conservation,
development and logistical functions towards tourism development and maintaining
healthy cooperation and coordination. Local governments should develop fund from
provincial and national governments or NGOs for preparation of management plan
and proper functioning of nature reserve with the support of management committee.
ere is need of control of air pollution, wastewater and waste management;
develop and implement wildlife conservation policies; and focus on conservation
and education programs. Also, scienti c researches, monitoring programs and
environmental impact assessments should be conducted for conserving biodiversity
and enhance tourism and other human activities that have negative impact on the
wildlife and their habitat. Research opportunities should be provided to attract
scientists and students to conduct research in the region. Sustainable forestry projects
should be developed to maximize potential production and maintain the natural
diversity, structure and function of the forest ecosystems (Genzong, et al., 2007).
Sustainable ecotourism imposes less environmental impacts, minimizes negative
externalities, promotes environmental and cultural integrity, and helps in e ective
resource management and generation of income (UNEP, 2013). Developing countries
have advantage from ecotourism as they have unique natural environments, cultures
and opportunities for adventure holidays. It generates employment for the unskilled
workforce in rural area through community-led tourism activities for preserving
natural ecosystems (UNEP, 2013). For ecotourism programme to be sustainable, all
the environmental, social and economic aspects should be taken care o . Economic
activities should be focused by conserving the nature, culture and moral aspects of
the society. Local resources, local traditions and local manpower should be prioritized
for attaining sustainability in ecotourism.
Cultural Ecotourism
It is an important aspect of ecotourism where there is need of preservation of
cultural traditions to enrich the quality of the life of local communities. It is necessary
to develop and promote minority cultures to preserve cultural traditions and organize
education and training programs of ecotourism and nature reserve to tourism
operators, employees and tourist (Genzong, et al., 2007). Cultural ecotourism is one
of the most popular forms of ecotourism developed worldwide from the historical
past. Religious places, cultural monuments, historical buildings, traditional museums
and popular arts and sculptures are the main bases of cultural ecotourism. Religious
beliefs, dresses, languages, music, literatures, occasions, festivals and traditions are
the main source of attractions and entertainment for ecotourists.
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)8
Impacts of Ecotourism
Ecotourism had both bene cial and adverse impacts on the environment, society
and culture. In comparison, there are more bene cial impacts and few adverse
impacts on di erent components of environment.
Environmental Impacts
Ecotourism emphasizes the protection of natural resources, biological diversity
and sustainability of resource (Bin, Suocheng, & Mei, 2008). It is a supply led
tourism strategy that does not exclude the tourist and commercial exploitation of the
ecosystem. It enables sustainable development with the central theme of ecosystem
integrity and encourages local people for the conservation and protection of the
environment (Degang & Xiaoting, 2006; Tyler & Danger eld, 1999). It generates
community bene ts from conservation and protection of the environment and
biodiversity (Ormsby & Mannle, 2006). Forest area, natural resources and biological
diversity can be increased while sustainability of resource use and tourism resources
can be enhanced during tourism development (Bin, et al., 2008).
Ecotourism in uences conservation, decreases deforestation and hunting rate
and discourages conversion of forest to agricultural and pastoral land (Stem, et al.,
2003). It is one of the preferred tools for conservation and community development
that increases benefit of communities and conservation activities (Du y, 2008). In
ecotourism, natural resources are protected by increasing recreational and tourist
potential as a center of attraction (Kelkit, Ozel, & Demirel, 2005). It enriches the area
with natural regeneration, new plantations, infrastructural development and new
destination for visitors and nature-based tourism (Nath & Alauddin, 2006).  ere is
positive bene t to  ora and fauna due to the decrease in environmental and cultural
impacts (Brunet, Bauer, De Lacy, & Tshering, 2001; Winson, 2006).
Ecological sustainability, grassroots development, environmental sensitivity and
responsibility promoted by ecotourism can serve the political, economic, social and
environmental interests of host communities (Kontogeorgopoulos, 2005). Ecotourism
supplies real experiences of natural environments and solution to increased tourists
and increased degradation of natural areas (Lieberknecht & Papazian, 1999). Multi-
sector planning and environment-friendly characteristic of ecotourism brings
ecological and economic bene ts to community and the whole country (Bin, et al.,
2008; Gezon, 2014).
Social Impacts
Similar to environmental impacts, adverse social impacts are minimal with
more positive impacts (Boxill & Severin, 2004). Ecotourism increases mobility of
people, social stability and harmony; strengthen traditional culture, hospitality
9K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
and folkway; and decreases political con icts (Bin, et al., 2008; Degang & Xiaoting,
2006; Schellhorn, 2010; Sreekumar & Parayil, 2002). Ecotourism operators organize
cultural tours with di erent community groups and introduce rich culture to
ensure experience of tourism stakeholders (Kelkit, et al., 2005; Stem, et al., 2003).
Ecotourism o ers diverse products and services categorized as both a service and an
experience (Chan & Baum, 2007). Ecotourism can cause social con icts between the
locals and government authorities and also challenge cultural values due to western
in uence (Gurung & Scholz, 2008; Maikhuri, Rana, Rao, Nautiyal, & Saxena, 2000).
ere may be increase in alcoholism, drug addiction and prostitution due to tourism
(Zambrano, Broadbent, & Durham, 2010). Foreign cultures brought by tourists have
an impact on local tradition and plain cultures (Bin, et al., 2008).
Economic Impacts
Economic bene ts from ecotourism include direct employment in hotels, lodges,
tourist restaurants, and tourist chau euring. It is an integral part of the master
development strategy of a developing nation (Doan, 2000; Stem, et al., 2003). It is
important to integrate ecotourism with farming activities, handicra and other local
businesses to bring more benefits in the society (Degang & Xiaoting, 2006). Parks
and protected areas need e ective participation of people for resource management
and self-reliant communities have greater chance of progress. Local community can
play a great role in empowering people to mobilize their own capacities (Singh &
Singh, 2004).
Ecotourism helps to collect revenue from fee and license from parks and overcome
the cost of production and coordinate with corporate and non-pro t entities
(Eagles, 2002; Stem, et al., 2003). Ecotourism is taken as the driving force of socio-
economic development, change in traditional growth patterns and construction of
harmonious and environment-friendly society (Eagles, 2002; Sreekumar & Parayil,
2002). It increases employment, releases environmental pressure and helps in
regional economic development. It can attract funds, increase revenue, enhances
transportation, improves accommodation, solves poverty problem and enhances
social stability and harmony. It transfer rural surplus labors to non-agricultural
industries, change the traditional rural lifestyle and productive style, increase the
income of farmers and improve the welfare. Ecotourism brings more economic
bene ts and ecological bene ts to the people (Bin, et al., 2008).
Ecotourism in Nepal
Nepal has an area of 147,181 sq. km. with great diversity of topographic, eco-
climatic, natural and cultural features. It is rich in Himalayan ranges, natural beauty,
protected areas, biodiversity, landscape, cultural heritage and ethnic diversity (Bhusal,
2007). It is one of the most adventurous cultural and ecotourism destinations in the
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)10
world with many trekking routes and sites for ecotourists to explore natural beauty
from east to west and north to south (K. C., 2016; K.C., et al., 2015; Musa, Hall, &
Higham, 2004; Nepal, 1997). It is naturally and culturally rich with Himalayas, green
forests, spring, waterfall, meandering river, lake, fertile valleys, and diverse  ora and
fauna (Bajracharya et al., 2011).
It is one of the most important adventurous, cultural and ecotourism destinations
in the world due to the presence of Himalayas, and cultural and natural attractions.
Eight of the 14 mountains in the world over 8000 m are in Nepal, including the world’s
highest, Mt. Everest (Musa, et al., 2004). ere are fragile, pristine and undisturbed
natural areas focusing on low-impact small scale tourism, ecological conservation,
economic development and political empowerment of local communities, cultures
and human rights (Bajracharya, et al., 2011). Ecotourism in Nepal is based on
promoting people participation in planning and management of tourism; increasing
community development, nature conservation and tourism linkages; and mobilizing
tourism incomes to safeguard resources.
Nepal has a total population of over 27.58 million (CBS, 2014), and it consists of
59 ethnic groups with 101 spoken languages. It is the birthplace of Lord Buddha, the
Light of Asia and has more than 1250 heritage sites identi ed and documented from
72 districts. Kathmandu Development Committee has listed a total of 870 religious
and cultural monuments in Kathmandu valley.  ere are eight World Cultural
Heritage Sites: Bhaktapur, Patan and Kathmandu Durbar Squares; Swayambhunath;
Baudhanath; Pashupatinath; Changunarayan and Lumbini (the birth place of Lord
Buddha) combined with two world’s Natural Heritage Sites: Sagarmatha and Chitwan
National Parks (Bhusal, 2007; K.C., 2016).
Community-based tourism in protected areas and outside protected areas in
di erent region of Nepal had supported livelihood of local communities (Acharya
& Halpenny, 2013; Nepal, 1997). As a result, Government of Nepal has developed
protected areas and cultural heritage sites for conserving wildlife, preserving culture
and enhancing ecotourism (Baral, Stern, & Hammett, 2012). In such areas, tourists
enjoy seeing mountain ranges, natural beauty, protected biodiversity, landscape,
cultural heritage and ethnic diversity (Bhusal, 2007; K. C., 2016). Tourism had
already been an alternative source of income generation in many rural and cultural
villages of Nepal through rural tourism initiatives (Acharya & Halpenny, 2013; K.C.,
et al., 2015).
In Sagarmatha National Park (SNP) (one of the natural heritage site), tourist can
enjoy scenic beauty, trek and climb Mountains, view Mt. Everest, enjoy local cultures
and traditions, and enjoy wilderness.  ere is inclusion of local participation,
economic viability, education dissemination, tourist satisfaction and tourism impact
11K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
reduction for sustaining ecotourism (Musa, et al., 2004). Climate change, unfavorable
weather change and other environmental impacts had a ected the tourism in SNP
by disturbing the travel of visitors to move around the area and decrease the length
of stay in the past.
Annapurna region is the popular trekking destinations providing the scenic
view of Annapurna range, Dhaulagiri, Machapuchhre and many other mountains.
ere is high diversity of ecosystems ranging from sub-tropical lowlands, temperate
forest to the worlds highest alpine peaks (Dowling, 2000). To manage the trekking
site and biological diversity, conservation area was set up handling management to
National Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC) (Nepal, 1997). Participatory natural
resources conservation method was implemented with the full support of local people
for making project  nancially sustainable (Nepal, 1997). To minimize the adverse
impacts and strengthen the positive bene ts of tourism, bottom up approach based
on local management is implemented in Annapurna Conservation Area (ACA)
(Dowling, 2000). Inside ACA, visitors can enjoy hiking, mountaineering, viewing
wildlife and visiting cultural sites, ethnic museums and natural photography (Baral, et
al., 2012). For this, ACAP collect entry fees from international tourist for community
development projects on health and sanitation, education, environmental protection,
etc. (Nepal, 1997). Unfavorable weather change due to the impact of climate change
had caused death of many tourist and had a ected trekking around ACA in the past.
Ecotourism in Barpak of Gorkha Nepal was one of the successful rural ecotourism
implemented in Nepal. It was able to solve socioeconomic, political, ethnic and
gender disparities.  ere were cleaner pathways, cleaner yards and junctions with
shops full of a variety of cleaner products, water taps and public toilets (Acharya &
Halpenny, 2013).  e devastating earthquake of April 2015 and its a ershocks had
destroyed the Barpak badly as it was the epicenter of the earthquake. Houses which
were used as homestays were destroyed and local people are trying to get away from
the adverse impacts by focusing on reconstruction of houses.
Total number of tourist arrival in Nepal decreased at the rate of 0.95 percent
from 797,616 in 2013 to 790,118 in 2014. Average length of stay had also decreased
from 12.51 in 2013 to 12.44 in 2014. Before 2013, annual growth rate of tourist and
average length of stay was in increasing trend. Out of total tourist arrival in Nepal,
47.3 percent tourist arrives for the purpose of holiday in 2012 and it increases to
51.5 percent in 2013 (K.C., 2016).  e devastating earthquake of April 2015 and its
a ershocks had also a ected the  ow of tourist in Nepal. Many trekking routes in
the Langtang, Gaurishankar, Manaslu, Gosainkunda, Rasuwa, Sindupalchowk and
Dolakha were a ected badly.  ese area are in reconstruction process and it will take
time to recover so that the  ow of tourist will increase as that of past.
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)12
Impacts of Ecotourism in Nepal
As Nepal is rich in ecological, social, cultural and ethnic diversity; there is a great
scope of ecotourism for overall development of country.  ere are positive as well as
negative environmental, social and economic impacts of ecotourism.
Environmental Impacts
Ecotourism helps to enhance forest cover,  ora, fauna, greenery, alternative energy
sources, natural resource and biodiversity in Ghandruk (K.C., et al., 2015).  ere are
good living rooms, bedrooms, toilets, showers, lodging, clean and comfortable stays,
local cuisines, natural scenery and positive interactions with host communities and
other bene ts to tourist in ACA (Nepal, 2007).  ere is
deforestation, pollution and
cultural degradation in Sagarmatha area due to tourism development activities (Musa,
et al., 2004). To promote ecotourism; greenery, forest resources, water resources and
other natural resources are managed which helps to increase the biodiversity of  ora
and fauna in the country. But, construction of roads and other infrastructures had
decreased the scenic beauty and greenery in the environment disturbing the  ow of
tourist in the area. Trekking tourism in most of the popular trekking route of Nepal
is disturbed by rural road construction.
Social Impacts
Ecotourism addresses gender inequities, social pride, and excitement of children,
peace and prosperity in Barpak. Coordination of local community members,
government agency and tourism entrepreneur had helped in the successful
implementation of ecotourism project (Acharya & Halpenny, 2013). Ecotourism
had helped in controlling antisocial activities, conserving religious and cultural
heritage, maintaining peace and prosperity and increase in cooperation of people
with religious beliefs and religious tolerance (K.C., et al., 2015). For the sustainability
in SNP, local participation, economic viability, education dissemination, tourist
satisfaction, environmental, cultural, economic and social impacts, health and safety
of the tourist and minimizing of tourism impact is important (Musa, et al., 2004).
Economic Impacts
Tourism is one of the important sectors contributing to the economic upli ment of
tourism dependent community and one of the small contributors to Nepal’s economy.
e total foreign exchange earnings and tourism sector contribution to GDP in Nepal
in  scal year 2012/13 was 34,210.6 million and 2.0 percent, respectively (K.C., 2016).
It had helped in economic development and job creation to local villagers with the
establishment of hotels, restaurants, tea shops, bakery cafes, grocery and gi shops
in Ghandruk (K.C., et al., 2015). It is able to generate more income and help local
people to provide important basic needs for household consumption in Manaslu
13K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
Conservation Area (K.C. &  apa Parajuli, 2014b). It has a great role in poverty
alleviation, rural development, agricultural transformation, community enrichment
and social empowerment of women in Nepal (Bajracharya, et al., 2011). It has a great
role in employment generation and socioeconomic development of a place (K. C.,
2016). Growth and development of Pokhara and Annapurna Conservation Area is a
good example of economic growth from ecotourism (K. C., 2016). Because of higher
incomes, many parents of Manang District of ACA can now a ord to send their
children to high schools and universities in Kathmandu (Bajracharya, et al., 2011).
Challenges of Ecotourism
In the early stage of tourism development, it is di cult to have adequate private
agencies and local people involvement in delivering tourism facilities. Lodging,
fooding, tour management and tourism activities seems to be unplanned during peak
visitation season.  ere is need of training on nature guiding, cooking and other
tourism facilities (Yip, Mohd, Ghani, & Emby, 2006). It is di cult to get competent
and dedicated human capital having good networking skill in ecotourism (Bertella,
2011). Lack of English language communication skills and lack of education is a major
challenge for tourism development (Cli on & Benson, 2006; Schellhorn, 2010).
Climate change is important challenge experienced by local people in di erent
region of Nepal including Manaslu Conservation Area in the form of increase in
temperature, irregular rainfall pattern, and less snowfall (K.C. &  apa Parajuli,
2014a).  ere is similar situation felt by local people in Annapurna Conservation Area,
Gaurishankar Conservation Area, Sagarmatha region, Kanchenjunga Conservation
Area and other trekking routes of Nepal. It is also causing decrease in tourist number
and tourist facilities in di erent region of Nepal.
Needs of Ecotourism
If the ecotourism concept is to be truly universal, the system must be adaptable
and inclusive. Planning and management of ecotourism need to be supervised by a
council, advisory board, association and a programme.  e roles of the stakeholders
involved in the project and hierarchy of the people involved should be clearly
articulated as the success of the ecotourism depend on appropriate levels of leadership,
cooperation and coordination. A protocol on ecotourism should be developed which
covers the standards, appropriate monitoring procedures and criteria. UNESCO
World Heritage system and the RAMSAR sites help to guide the formation of the
ecotourism system with the centrality of the ecotourism component for achieving
sustainability outcomes (Fennell & Weaver, 2005).
Sustainable use of tourism resources, proper handling of tourism demands,
expertise in park management and  nance management is important for sustainable
development of tourism and tourism management (Eagles, 2002; Shi et al., 2014).
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)14
Biodiversity conservation, cultural heritage preservation, improvement of accessibility,
liberalisation of pricing policy, community empowerment, development of tourism
facilities, incorporation of nature-based tourism products, interdisciplinary and
interdepartmental e ort, collaboration between conservation and tourism authorities
is necessary to develop ecotourism (Gurung & Scholz, 2008). Successful ecotourism
considers bene ciaries, socioeconomic constraints, impacts on the resource base,
inclusion of local bene ts, economic viability, education dissemination and tourist
satisfaction (Musa, et al., 2004; Tyler & Danger eld, 1999).
Support and participation of local communities in tourism planning and
development is important for conservation and management to avoid serious
con icts with the management and make ecotourism sustainable (Boxill & Severin,
2004; Genzong, et al., 2007; Zal & Breda, 2010). Community involvement, community
organizing, environmental education and leadership training is important for
sustainable development of ecotourism (Catibog-Sinha & Wen, 2008).
Conclusions
Ecotourism helps in biodiversity conservation, poverty reduction and business
viability using sustainable principles and practices. Local government o cials, local
communities, NGOs, private sector and management committee had a great role for
tourism development and maintaining healthy cooperation and coordination. It has
environmental, social and economic impacts in the community and the whole country.
In Nepal, ecotourism helps in environmental conservation, social enhancement and
economic development of a particular area where ecotourism is being promoted. It had
helped in controlling antisocial activities, conserving religious and cultural heritage,
maintaining peace and prosperity and increase in cooperation of people with religious
beliefs and religious tolerance. Poverty alleviation, rural development, agricultural
transformation and community enrichment is promoted by ecotourism in Nepal.  ere
are many challenges faced by ecotourism entrepreneurs and tourist in the early stage of
planning and management. Adequate training on nature guiding, cooking, sustainable
use of tourism resources, proper handling of tourism demands, expertise in park
management and  nance management can help to solve the challenges of ecotourism.
References
Acharya, B. P., & Halpenny, E. A. (2013). Homestays as an Alternative Tourism
Product for Sustainable Community Development: A Case Study of Women
Managed Tourism Product in Rural Nepal. Tourism Planning & Development,
10(4), 367-387. doi: 10.1080/21568316.2013.779313
Amati, C. (2013). We all voted for it: Experiences of Participation in Community-
based Ecotourism from the Foothills of Mt Kilimanjaro. Journal of Eastern African
Studies, 7(4), 650-670. doi: 10.1080/17531055.2013.841023
15K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
Bajracharya, S. B., Basnet, G., Kharel, F., Shah, K. B., Baral, H. S., & Charmakar,
R. (2011). Gaurishankar Conservation Area: A Treasure House of Himalayan
Biodiversity. Lalitpur: National Trust for Nature Conservation, Khumaltar.
Baral, N., Stern, M. J., & Hammett, A. L. (2012). Developing a Scale for Evaluating
Ecotourism by Visitors: A Study in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal.
Journal of Sustainable Tour ism, 20 (7), 975-989. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2012.663379
Bertella, G. (2011). Wildlife Tourism and Natural Sciences Knowledge: Challenges
and Critical Factors. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 11(1), 97-
114. doi: 10.1080/15022250.2011.540794
Bhusal, N. P. (2007). Chitwan National Park: A Prime Destination of Eco-Tourism in
Central Tarai Region, Nepal. e ird Pole, 5(7), 70-75.
Bin, L., Suocheng, D., & Mei, X. (2008). Ecotourism Model and Bene ts of Periphery
Regions in Western Sichuan Province. Chinese Journal of Population Resources
and Environment, 6(2), 80-86. doi: 10.1080/10042857.2008.10684873
Boxill, I., & Severin, F. O. (2004). An Exploratory Study of Tourism Development
and Its Impact on the Caribs of Dominica. International Journal of Hospitality &
Tourism Administration, 5(1), 1-27. doi: 10.1300/J149v05n01_01
Brunet, S., Bauer, J., De Lacy, T., & Tshering, K. (2001). Tourism Development in
Bhutan: Tensions between Tradition and Modernity. Journal of Sustainable
Tourism, 9(3), 243-263. doi: 10.1080/09669580108667401
Burakowski, E., & Magnusson, M. (2012). Climate Impacts on the Winter Tourism
Economy in the United States. In A. Kennaugh (Ed.): University of New
Hampshire.
Catibog-Sinha, C., & Wen, J. (2008). Sustainable Tourism Planning and Management
Model for Protected Natural Areas: Xishuangbanna Biosphere Reserve,
South China Asia Paci c Journal of Tourism Research, 13(2), 145-162. doi:
10.1080/10941660802048431
CBS. (2014). ENVIRONMENT STATISTICS OF NEPAL 2013. Kathmandu:
Government of Nepal National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau
of Statistics.
Ceballos-Lascurain, H. (1996). Tourism, Ecotourism and Protected Areas:  e State
of Nature-based Tourism Around the World and Guidelines for its Development.
Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Chan, J. K. L., & Baum, T. (2007). Ecotourists’ Perception of Ecotourism Experience
in Lower Kinabatangan, Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(5),
574-590. doi: 10.2167/jost679.0
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)16
Cli on, J., & Benson, A. (2006). Planning for Sustainable Ecotourism:  e Case for
Research Ecotourism in Developing Country Destinations. Journal of Sustainable
Tourism, 14(3), 238-254. doi: 10.1080/09669580608669057
Cusack, D., & Dixon, L. (2006). Commimity-Based Ecotourism and Sustainability.
Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 22(1-2), 157-182. doi: 10.1300/J091v22n01_09
Das, N., & Syiemlieh, H. J. (2009). Ecotourism in Wetland Ecology. Anatolia: An
International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 20(2), 445-450. doi:
10.1080/13032917.2009.10518920
Degang, W., & Xiaoting, H. (2006). Coincidence and Upgrade: A Typical Case Study
of Rural Ecotourism Development. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and
Environment, 4(1), 45-53. doi: 10.1080/10042857.2006.10677449
Doan, T. M. (2000).  e E ects of Ecotourism in Developing Nations: An
Analysis of Case Studies. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(4), 288-304. doi:
10.1080/09669580008667365
Dowling, R. K. (2000). Global Ecotourism at the Start of the New Millennium. Wor l d
Leisure Journal, 42(2), 11-19. doi: 10.1080/04419057.2000.9674182
Du y, R. (2008). Neoliberalising Nature: Global Networks and Ecotourism
Development in Madagasgar. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16(3), 327-344. doi:
10.1080/09669580802154124
Eagles, P. F. J. (2002). Trends in Park Tourism: Economics, Finance and Management.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 10(2), 132-153. doi: 10.1080/09669580208667158
Fennell, D., & Weaver, D. (2005).  e Ecotourium Concept and Tourism-
Conservation Symbiosis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13(4), 373-390. doi:
10.1080/09669580508668563
Genzong, X., Penghua, Q., & Shaoxia, T. (2007). Nature Reserve and Ecotourism
Development in China’s Wuzhishan Mountain Region. Chinese Journal of Population
Resources and Environment, 5(1), 74-83. doi: 10.1080/10042857.2007.10677491
Gezon, L. L. (2014). Who Wins and Who Loses? Unpacking the Local People
Concept in Ecotourism: A Longitudinal Study of Community Equity in
Ankarana, Madagascar. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22(5), 821-838. doi:
10.1080/09669582.2013.847942
Gurung, D. B., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Community-based Ecotourism in Bhutan:
Expert Evaluation of Stakeholder-based Scenarios. International Journal
of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(5), 397-411. doi: 10.3843/
SusDev.15.5:1
17K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
Hawkins, D. E. (2004). A Protected Areas Ecotourism Competitive Cluster Approach
to Catalyse Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Growth in Bulgaria. Journal
of Sustainable Tourism, 12(3), 219-244. doi: 10.1080/09669580408667235
Honey, M. (2008). Ecotourism and Sustainable Development: Who Owns Paradise?
(Second Edition ed.). Washington D.C., USA: Island Press.
K. C., A. (2016). Ecotourism and Its Role in Sustainable Development of Nepal. In L.
Butowski (Ed.), Tourism - From Empirical Research Towards Practical Application
(pp. 31-59): In Tech.
K.C., A. (2016). Hydropower Development, Ecotourism and Green Economy in the
Context of Nepal. Bidhyut, 26(2), 9-13.
K.C., A., Rijal, K., & Sapkota, R. P. (2015). Role of ecotourism in environmental
conservation and socioeconomic development in Annapurna conservation area,
Nepal. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(3),
251-258. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2015.1005721
K.C., A., &  apa Parajuli, R. B. (2014a). Climate Change and Its Impact on Tourism
in the Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal. Tourism Planning & Development, 13.
doi: 10.1080/21568316.2014.933122
K.C., A., &  apa Parajuli, R. B. (2014b). Tourism and Its Impact on Livelihood in
Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal. Environment Development and Sustainability,
16, 1053–1063. doi: 10.1007/s10668-013-9512-7
Kelkit, A., Ozel, A. E., & Demirel, O. (2005). A Study of the Kazdagi (Mt. Ida) National
Park: An Ecological Approach to the Management of Tourism. International
Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 12(2), 141-148. doi:
10.1080/13504500509469625
Kontogeorgopoulos, N. (2005). Community-Based Ecotourism in Phuket and Ao
Phangnga,  ailand:nPartial Victories and Bittersweet Remedies. Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 13(1), 4-23. doi: 10.1080/17501220508668470
Lieberknecht, K., & Papazian, J. (1999). Balancing Conservation and Economics,  e
Development of an Ecotourism Plan for Panama. Journal of Sustainable Forestry,
8(3-4), 107-126. doi: 10.1300/J091v08n03_09
Maikhuri, R. K., Rana, U., Rao, K. S., Nautiyal, S., & Saxena, K. G. (2000). Promoting
Ecotourism in the Bu er Zone Areas of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve: An
Option to Resolve People—policy Con ict. International Journal of Sustainable
Development & World Ecology, 7(4), 333-342. doi: 10.1080/13504500009470052
Musa, G., Hall, C. M., & Higham, J. E. S. (2004). Tourism Sustainability and Health
Impacts in High Altitude Adventure, Cultural and Ecotourism Destinations: A
The GAZE Journal of Tourism and Hospitality (Vol. 8)18
Case Study of Nepal’s Sagarmatha National Park. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,
12(4), 306-331. doi: 10.1080/09669580408667240
Nath, T. K., & Alauddin. (2006). Sitakunda Botanical Garden and Eco-park,
Chittagong, Bangladesh: Its Impacts on a Rural Community. International Journal
of Biodiversity Science & Management, 2(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1080/17451590609618095
Nepal, S. K. (1997). Sustainable Tourism, Protected Areas and Livelihood Needs of
Local Communities in Developing Countries. International Journal of Sustainable
Development & World Ecology, 4(2), 123-135. doi: 10.1080/13504509709469948
Nepal, S. K. (2007). Ecotourists’ Importance and Satisfaction Ratings of
Accommodation-Related Amenities. Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism
and Hospitality Research, 18(2), 255-276. doi: 10.1080/13032917.2007.9687205
Ormsby, A., & Mannle, K. (2006). Ecotourism Bene ts and the Role of Local Guides
at Masoala National Park, Madagascar. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 14(3),
271-287. doi: 10.1080/09669580608669059
Randall, A. (1987). Resource Economics (Second Edition ed.). New York, USA: John
Wiley and Sons.
Schellhorn, M. (2010). Development for Whom? Social Justice and the
Business of Ecotourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(1), 115-135. doi:
10.1080/09669580903367229
Shi, L., Zhao, H., Li, Y., Ma, H., Yang, S., & Wang, H. (2014). Evaluation of Shangri-La
County’s tourism resources and ecotourism carrying capacity. Inter national Journal
of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2014.927018
Sindiga, I. (1999). Alternative Tourism and Sustainable Development in Kenya.
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(2), 108-127. doi: 10.1080/09669589908667330
Singh, T. V., & Singh, S. (2004). On Bringing People and Park Together through
Ecotourism:  e Nanda Devi National Park, India. Asia Paci c Journal of Tourism
Research, 9(1), 43-55. doi: 10.1080/1094166042000199602
Sreekumar, T. T., & Parayil, G. (2002). Contentions and Contradictions of Tourism
as Development Option:  e Case of Kerala, India. ird World Quarterly, 23(3),
529-548. doi: 10.1080/01436590220138411
Stem, C. J., Lassoie, J. P., Lee, D. R., & Deshler, D. J. (2003). How Eco is Ecotourism?
A Comparative Case Study of Ecotourism in Costa Rica. Journal of Sustainable
Tourism, 11(4), 322-347. doi: 10.1080/09669580308667210
Sung, T. P., Bagul, H. B. P., Sentian, J., & Dambul, R. (2012). Developing and Promoting
a Highland Community Livelihood for Sustainable Tourism:  e Case of Kg.
Bundutuhan, Ranau, Sabah. Malaysia Journal of Society and Space, 8(5), 94 - 99.
19K. C. : Ecotourism in Nepal
TIES. (1990). What is Ecotourism? Retrieved May 14, 2014, from https://www.
ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism
Tyler, D., & Danger eld, J. M. (1999). Ecosystem Tourism: A Resource-based
Philosophy for Ecotourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 7(2), 146-158. doi:
10.1080/09669589908667332
UNEP. (2013). Tourism: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities Green Economy and
Tra de (pp. 259-291): United Nations Environment Programme.
Winson, A. (2006). Ecotourism and Sustainability in Cuba: Does Socialism
Make a Di erence? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 14(1), 6-23. doi:
10.1080/09669580608668588
Wood, M. A. (2002). Ecotourism: Principles, Practices and Policies for Sustainability
(First ed.). Paris, France: United Nation Publication.
Yip, H. W., Mohd, A., Ghani, A. N. A., & Emby, Z. (2006). Participatory of Local Operators
in Ecotourism Services Delivery:  e Nature-based Tourism Development in
Pahang National Park, Malaysia. Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism
and Hospitality Research, 17(2), 313-318. doi: 10.1080/13032917.2006.9687192
Zal, N., & Breda, Z. (2010). Tourism in Protected Areas: Observations from
Kuscenneti National Park. Anatolia: An International Journal of Tourism and
Hospitality Research, 21(1), 73-87. doi: 10.1080/13032917.2010.9687091
Zambrano, A. M. A., Broadbent, E. N., & Durham, W. H. (2010). Social and
Environmental E ects of Ecotourism in the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica:  e Lapa
Rios Case. Journal of Ecotourism, 9(1), 62-83. doi: 10.1080/14724040902953076

Supplementary resource (1)

... Dengan kata lain, ekowisata secara teori perlu menjadi bentuk wisata yang bertanggung jawab secara ekologis untuk memastikan bahwa sumber daya dan lingkungan alamnya tetap lestari dan terlindungi (Kiper, 2013). Dalam rangka memaksimalkan potensi produksi dan menjaga keanekaragaman, struktur, dan fungsi ekosistem hutan maka perlu memperhatikan keberadaan hutan di situs ekowisata (Anup, 2017). Ekowisata kemudian tidak berkelanjutan jika kegiatannya dapat meningkatkan adanya konversi hutan dan deforestasi. ...
... Lalu, keberlanjutan sosial dalam ekowisata yaitu memberikan dampak sosial yang lebih positif, ekowisata mampu meningkatkan mobilitas manusia, stabilitas dan keharmonisan sosial, memperkuat budaya tradisional, dan mengurangi konflik (Anup, 2017). Oleh sebab itu, untuk mempertahankan keberlanjutannya, ekowisata perlu menjaga kualitas fasilitas dan pelayanan. ...
... Keberlanjutan tersebut dapat terlihat dari peran aktif masyarakat dalam mengoperasikan dan mengelola ekowisata di wilayahnya (Mohd Noh et al., 2020). Kemudian, keberadaan ekowisata dapat menyebabkan adanya konflik sosial di masyarakat lokal karena adanya pengaruh budaya asing yang dibawa oleh pengunjung (Anup, 2017). Tindakan kriminal yang dapat terjadi seperti misalnya peningkatan kecanduan alkohol, narkoba, prostitusi, maupun tindak pencurian (Anup, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Ciwidey District is one of the leading tourist destinations in West Java Province. Lebakmuncang, Rawabogo, and Panundaan Tourism Villages are three villages that play an essential role in ecotourism and the development of educational tourism in the Ciwidey District. Sustainability is fundamental in ecotourism because ecotourism needs to contribute to ecological, social, and economic sustainability. The existence of problems and negative trends can lead to unsustainable ecotourism practices. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the location of the development of sustainable ecotourism areas in the Ciwidey District by paying attention to 3 aspects of sustainability: ecological, social, and economic. Sustainability levels are classified into four classes: very strong, strong, weak, and very weak. The results showed that the majority area of the Rawabogo Village belongs to a very weak level of sustainability. Then, the entire Panundaan Village area has a weak level of ecotourism sustainablity. While most of Lebakmuncang Village’s area has a strong level of ecotourism sustainability.
... Ecotourism related employment opportunities improve local socioeconomic conditions and offer a sustainable income. For this reason, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) declared that ecotourism initiatives around the world increase job opportunities and enhance socio-economic growth (Stemet al., 2003;Anup, 2017). ...
Article
Tourist organizations, such as Sindh Tourism Development Corporation (STDC), Sustainable Development Foundation (SDF), and WorldWide Fund for Nature-Pakistan (WWF-Pakistan), agree that ecotourism has a significant potential to invite both domestic and foreign visitors. Accordingly, ecotourism industry has been promoted as one of the most important tourist industries due to its potential for protecting natural resources, while also improving the socioeconomic conditions of local residents. As per there view of relevant literature, most of the developed and underdeveloped nations utilize their natural assets for tourism and economic upliftment. Thus, the study aimed at determining how ecotourism development adds to the economic growth of local communities of the study region. The research was carried out in Chotiari Wetland Complex, Sindh, Pakistan primarily due to its scenic natural assets. The research sample included officials of local non-governmental organizations (NGOs), local community organizations, the management of Chotiari's Nature Reserve, local leaders, and individuals from local households living in areas surrounding the wetland. A sample of 60 participants was chosen from the community using a random sampling methodology. Mixed-methods research, comprising both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, was used to collect and analyze the collected data, interpret results, and draw conclusions. A questionnaire survey was used as a tool to collect data. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 22) was utilized to evaluate quantitative records, while content interpretation was conducted to evaluate qualitative information. The findings indicated that ecotourism and wetland development improved the local economic growth of the studied region through job creation and capacity building.
... In fact, several researchers have also agreed that climate change has a significant influence on the tourism sector (Hoogendoorn and Fitchett, 2016;Liu, 2016;Scott et al., 2012). Studies on the impacts of climate change have highlighted several implications to tourism for instance shifts in tourists flow, shifts in destination choice of tourist and discomfort in transportation (Anup, 2017;Ngxongo, 2021). These integrated effects of climate change are believed can stimulate risks and opportunities to tourism market segment and sustainable tourism development (Buckley et al., 2015;Scott, 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
Climate change is a critical issue today which significantly affected not just the ecosystem of the community but also the sustainability of tourism industry. Climate change consequences on sustainable tourism are crucial because it increases the danger of species extinction, decreases freshwater, increases wildfire accidents, heat waves, and illnesses, all of which cause visitors to avoid certain places. This study surveyed the community awareness toward climate change and also their perceptions regarding the adaptation strategies for impacts of climate change on sustainable tourism in Malaysia. A number of 400 respondents living in the area of sustainable tourism in Malaysia which are directly and indirectly affected by climate change was selected to fulfill the objectives of the study. An online survey was implemented for the purpose of distributing questionnaire during the pandemic. The findings indicated that two domains derived as adaptation strategies and were named as enhancing awareness and capacity development and also diversification of sustainable tourism activities. This study significantly provides the policymakers a comprehensive adaptation plan to overcome the impacts of climate change on sustainable tourism in Malaysia through the community perspectives. It also assists the policymakers to strongly understand the consequences of adaptation measures of climate change for the future sustainability of tourism industry in Malaysia.
... Ecotourism related employment opportunities improve local socioeconomic conditions and offer a sustainable income. For this reason, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) declared that ecotourism initiatives around the world increase job opportunities and enhance socio-economic growth (Stemet al., 2003;Anup, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Tourist organizations, such asSindh Tourism Development Corporation (STDC), Sustainable Development Foundation (SDF), andWorldWide Fund for Nature-Pakistan (WWF-Pakistan), agree that ecotourism has a significant potential to invite both domestic and foreign visitors. Accordingly, ecotourism industry has been promoted as one of the most important tourist industries due to its potential for protecting natural resources, while also improving the socio-economic conditions of local residents. As per thereview of relevant literature, most of the developed and underdeveloped nations utilize their natural assets for tourism and economic upliftment. Thus, the study aimed at determining how ecotourism development adds to the economic growth of local communities of the study region. The research was carried out in Chotiari Wetland Complex,Sindh, Pakistan primarily due to its scenic natural assets. The research sample included officials of local non-governmental organizations (NGOs), local community organizations, the management of Chotiari's Nature Reserve, local leaders, and individuals from local households living inareas surrounding the wetland.A sample of 60 participants was chosen from the communityusing a random sampling methodology. Mixed-methods research, comprising both quantitative and qualitative methodologies,wasused to collect and analyzethe collected data, interpret results, and draw conclusions. A questionnaire survey was used as a toolto collect data. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 22) was utilized to evaluate quantitative records, while content interpretation was conductedtoevaluate qualitative information. The findings indicated that ecotourism and wetland developmentimprovedthe local economic growth of the studied region through jobcreation and capacity building. Keywords: ecotourism,foreign visitors, local economic growth, natural resources, wetland development, WWF-Pakistan
... This finding confirms the study of Anup (2017), who stated that ecotourism had more beneficial impacts compared to adverse impacts on the environment, society and culture. It emphasizes the protection of natural resources, biological diversity and sustainability of resource. ...
Article
Full-text available
This descriptive correlational study aimed at determining the viability, prospects and challenges of ecotourism in Lobo, Batangas. It engaged 120 members of the people’s organizations involved in ecotourism. Majority of the respondents aged 56 to 59, male, a high school graduate, had been involved in ecotourism business for either 1 to 4 years or 5 to 8 years, and had attended 1 to 2 trainings. The level of viability of ecotourism in Lobo, Batangas was ‘very high’ with a weighted mean of 3.43. The respondents strongly agreed with a weighted mean of 3.38 to the prospects of growth and development of ecotourism in Lobo, Batangas. Likewise, they agreed with a weighted mean of 3.03 to the myriad of challenges encountered in their involvement in ecotourism. There was a significant difference in their understanding of the viability of ecotourism along marketing aspect, when grouped according to the number of years of involvement in ecotourism and number of trainings attended in ecotourism. The respondents with 5 or more trainings had higher appreciation of the level of viability of ecotourism in the locality than those with 1 to 2 trainings and those with 3 to 4 trainings. Members of the people’s organizations recognize the business prospects and abundant opportunities for growth and development for the community and its residents in the ecotourism sites despite the myriad of problems that beset them. Thus, the proposed action plan should be considered by stakeholders in the ecotourism business in Lobo, Batangas.
Article
Tourism is an important sector for many people in Nepal. There have been a number of damaging shocks in the last decade, including the 2015 earthquake and the COVID-19 pandemic, that have stopped the industry in its tracks. The effects of slow onset climate change are also impacting the industry and are forecast to get worse. An entrepreneurial ecosystem in Nepal has been established to foster resilience among participating businesses. This research addresses whether social capital contributes to the resilience of tourism startups in Nepal and whether an entrepreneurial ecosystem fosters that social capital. Further, it asks whether renewable energy and energy efficient practices have impacted resilience. And, finally, whether there is evidence of transformative change within the businesses studied. Results suggest that relationships generated through enduring historical shocks in the tourism economy in Nepal have fostered social capital, and that the entreprenuerial ecosystem has itself cultivated elements of social capital and resilience in the participating businesses. While firm conclusions could not be drawn as to whether transformative change has occurred in the businesses, the foundation for realising transformational opportunities has been established. This study suggests that resilience can be reframed from its historically ecological confines to be a more fluid and adaptable concept of human agency affected socio-ecological systems and may eventually allow, and be a driver of, transformational change in businesses participating in an entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Chapter
Full-text available
Panchase region represents the middle mountain ecological zone in Nepal, which is less addressed amongst the country’s system of protected areas, and is the only corridor linkage between the lowland ecosystem and the middle mountain. Socio-ecological production landscapes and seascapes (SEPLS) result in balanced interactions of nature and society with wise and adaptive management of ecosystem services and limited use of land within the carrying capacity and resilience of the ecosystem. The collective declaration of World Peace Biodiversity Park (WPBP) in the region near Pokhara is a notable example of a SEPLS. WPBP’s main vision is to promote the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity based on ecotourism. With financial support from the government, local communities and the private enterprise Back to Nature, have implemented various activities, including construction of an eco-trail, restoration of a natural pond, plantation, bioengineering measures, and declaration of WPBP with a ticket house as per the management plan (2020–2024). Initiation and development of the activities of WPBP through its conservation committee have contributed to conservation and restoration of the ecosystems by reducing siltation and recharging water tables, thereby maintaining soil fertility in its first year. The capacity of local communities in ecotourism business was enhanced to offer visitors quality trekking experiences and to help retain the spending of visitors in the local economy to the extent possible. Issues such as overexploitation of natural resources, forest fires, expansion of alien invasive plant species, outmigration, and lack of appropriate institutional structures, are barriers to ecosystem restoration, and therefore should be urgently addressed to ensure greater benefit for the local and indigenous people. Private community partnerships and support from government for the WPBP declaration, underpinned by the principles of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and ecotourism principles, have contributed to the unique and sustainable landscape in accordance with the SEPLS concept based on the balanced management of land, water, and living resources. The Panchase landscape offers a great potential to blend nature and culture for ecotourism initiatives that have direct implications for ecosystem restoration. Financial, technical, and collective participation from key stakeholders based on effective implementation of a management plan is a prerequisite for realising the dream of nature-based tourism and transformation of WPBP into a “Living Laboratory of Ecotourism.”KeywordsInstitutionBiodiversityRestorationEcotourismEcosystem services
Article
This paper attempts to analyze turtle-based ecotourism in the Betana wetland of Koshi Province, eastern Nepal. Betana is considered a nature tourism area and tourists are enjoying undeveloped natural areas of wildlife while ecotourism is a form of tourism that involved responsible travel to natural areas, conserving the environment, and improving the well-being of the local people. Nowadays, both nature tourism and ecotourism is considered the inseparable pillar of the economic development of many developing countries, like Nepal. This paper is based on primary sources of data. Data were collected from field observation, questionnaire survey, interviews, and focus group discussions. The findings reveal that Betana Wetland is located accessible area of the East-West highway in Belbari Municipality of Morang district. The ideal condition of the wetland provides a natural habitat for turtle species. A large number of tourists visit day-by-day enjoying a good habitat of turtles. The figure indicates a total of 122100 (75.23%) tourists visited the Betana wetland to watch turtles in 2017. Indeed it was 75.57 percent in 2016. The calculated F= 20.887, P value = 3.88, and F crit= 2.717 indicates that there is a close association between the patterns and the number of tourists visiting this area in different months in 2016 and 2017. The paper concludes that a visitor spent about 2.81 hours in the Betana wetland and an hour watching and playing with turtles (68.46%) for feeding, watching (9.17%), teasing (10.85%), and trying to capture (5.84%). This paper suggests that specific attention should be given to the conservation of the Betana wetland for establishing a spot of the turtle based-tourism.
Article
Full-text available
The research problem is that West Nusa Tenggara lacks the local characteristics to support sustainable eco-tourism and culture. The case study of the quantitative descriptive method was used to describe the motivation behind the establishment of sustainable eco-tourism, the evaluation of triple helix support factors (government, academia, and green product business actors) in the development of the ecotourism, evaluation of internal factors of ecotourism, SWOT analysis, and the establishment of a green entrepreneur development strategy model in weaving and pearl industries. The results of the study show that the pearl shell breeding industry in West Lombok, which consists of pearl shellfish culture, treatment, pearl shell growing, pearl cultivation, pearl processing, pearl processing into jewelry, processing pearl shell waste into jewelry, and souvenirs, as well as the use of pearl shell meat for consumption, has high economic value and provides strong appeal for tourists. Pearl shell businesses from upstream to downstream can be used as a typical green tourism model of West Nusa Tenggara with high educational value. The woven fabric industry with natural dyes from various types of leaves, skins, and logs in Pringgasela village can empower 1,250,000 women.
Article
Full-text available
Community based home-stay tourism (CBHST) has been promoted by the provincial government of Gandaki in recent years for the socioeconomic benefit it provides to the local people in Nepal. However, the degree of involvement of local people in community based home-stay tourism varies between different localities and districts of the province, depending on the natural and cultural attractions, and hospitality practices in the host communities. This study discusses the local participation, benefit sharing and the practices to preserve culture and nature based tourism products. The study explores the involvement of local people in home-stay tourism by analyzing the data collected using face to face interview with a targeted home-stay operators and members of the home-stay management committee. The study reveals that local people are actively involved in the operating and benefit sharing of CBHST, hence it is an appropriate ecotourism model for local involvement and promote rural tourism based on local skills, knowledge and resources.
Article
Full-text available
Homestay tourism is popular in many destinations; it adds authentic sociocultural richness to the tourist's experience. For a nation that cannot make extensive infrastructural investment a priority but which possesses an abundance of tourism richness in remote communities, homestays are an attractive alternative tourism product. This paper discusses a case study of Barpak, located in the Gorkha District of Western Nepal. The study suggests homestays are congruent with Nepal's destination image. The essence of Nepalese tourism lies in naturally beautiful rural hills and mountains and its indigenous communities with their mystical lifestyle and culture. These natural and cultural attributes can be showcased best through homestays. This paper proposes homestays as a pro-women tourism opportunity that promotes sustainable community development by fostering gender equality. Female ownership of homestay businesses secures women's avenues for income generation and involves them in mainstream development. The study's indicators of development are based on the well-being achieved by the Barpaki community, with a focus on three essential aspects of sustainable development, namely economic, environmental and social. The author's (BPA) own experience of collaboration, on behalf of the nation's tourism authority the Nepal Tourism Board, with the community of Barpak in setting-up the homestay management, was a primary source of information for this case along with related literature reviews. The data was derived through community-based action research and evaluation methodologies. Information was based on first-hand experiences generated through ethnographic observations and semi-structured interviews.
Article
Full-text available
Utilizing the importance-performance construct, this paper examines ecotourists' perceived importance of and satisfaction from, accommodation-related services and facilities in Nepal's Annapurna region, a mountain protected area. Analysis is based on 120 on-site questionnaire interviews conducted with trekkers during summer 2004, and complemented by in-depth qualitative discussions with some trekkers. Results show that trekkers tend to rate more highly the importance of natural attributes than comfort and hygiene-related attributes. Their satisfaction ratings of the natural attributes are high and exceed their importance ratings. While satisfaction ratings of hygiene-related attributes do not exceed trekkers' importance ratings, the mean values are nevertheless high indicating a reasonable level of satisfaction with these items. Some trekkers complain that lodging facilities in the Annapurna region are approaching closer to what one might expect in more commercialized destinations. Results also indicate that satisfaction does not correlate with trekkers' willingness to pay eco-fee. Implications for further research are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
During the last two decades, extensive networks of protected areas in many developing countries have stimulated growth in protected area-based tourism. As protected area tourism occurs in isolated and remote rural regions, it is often assumed that such regions will experience stimulation of economic activities induced by tourism from which local people will be able to derive tangible benefits. Evidence suggests that this is rarely the case. Indeed, in the majority of protected areas, benefits have hardly reached the local community which bears the heaviest burden of protected area management. When a protected area is established and opened for tourism, it is often outsiders who rush in to siphon-off a major portion of the tourism income generated locally. Nevertheless, there are some pioneering approaches such as CAMPFIRE (Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources) and ACAP (Annapurna Conservation Area Project) which have attempted to fulfil livelihood needs of local communities using benefits derived from wildlife or nature-based tourism. Both projects emphasize a people-centred, participatory democratic approach. Citing various examples from developing countries, this paper discusses the dependent nature of tourism in general, impact of protected area tourism on local livelihoods, and some constraints and opportunities for the long-term viability of protected areas.
Article
Full-text available
Located right at the foot of Mt. Kinabalu but 1,200 m above sea-level the challenge of developing and promoting sustainable tourism in Kg. Bundu Tuhan is formidable. The most crucial is identifying existing tourism assets (both tangible and non-tangible) and converting them into profitable business which are aggravated by a glaring lack of knowledge and skills in business management and marketing strategy. This study seeks to determine existing viable tourism assets of village and to establish a conceptual framework on how to develop these assets. The study employs qualitative approaches, such as the use of case studies and surveys. This paper outlines the findings of the ground investigation, which are: (i) the identification of existing tourism assets; (ii) the establishment of preferred mechanisms in turning the assets into business; and (iii) the development of conceptual model for capacity building for the community based on the items identified in (i) and (ii). This paper concludes the study by recommending that a successful implementation of the outcome of the capacity building (the actual execution of the projects) that could lead to the equitable distribution of benefits and opportunities among stakeholders and could improve the well-being of the local community.
Article
Ecotourism has been used successfully in many countries to promote economic well-being, conserve natural resources, and promote community development. A thorough examination of the factors that make a successful and unsuccessful ecotourism program was conducted in this paper. This analysis was performed in order to formulate recommendations for the development of an ecotourism program in the Panama Canal Watershed that will meet these objectives. A careful look at the conservation of natural areas, community development, and the economics of ecotourism fleshed out the good and the bad of existing programs. Case studies from other developing countries were used in order to set up criteria that should be used in Panama's blossoming ecotourism industry. Panama has a vast array of natural and cultural resources that can benefit from a carefully planned ecotourism program. When planning this initiative it is very important to take the politics of the country and communities into consideration, make sure the project is scaled to the carrying capacity of the natural resources and community involved, use existing infrastructure, train a skilled local work force, and maintain monitoring programs that ensure that an unsuccessful program be either improved or terminated. If these steps are taken, an ecotourism program in Panama could be very successful.
Article
Ecotourism as a component of the green economy is one of the fastest growing segments of the tourism industry, and focuses on environmental conservation, socioeconomic development and capitalist development. With an objective to identify and quantify impacts of ecotourism on environmental conservation, social and cultural heritage preservation, economic development and enhancement of livelihoods, this study was carried out in the Ghandruk Village Development Committee of Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Two hundred and forty two households were interviewed, followed by three focus group discussions and five key informant interviews. It can be observed that socioeconomic variables had a positive effect on tourism participation with the exception of age and landholding status having a negative effect. Ecotourism helps in environmental conservation and socioeconomic development. It also helps in increasing employment and entrepreneurship at a local level. Income and expenditure of local people had increased because of ecotourism. Participation in ecotourism, the education level, an increase in productive human capital and an increase in income had enhanced people’s livelihoods. So, awareness and education programmes related to tourism, and strategies to increase the length of stay of visitors would be recommended.
Article
Kenya recognizes tourism as an important economic sector with significant potential to contribute to the national gross domestic product (GDP) and to the country's sustainable development goals. Ecotourism ideals intend to enable communities to benefit from the use of natural and cultural resources available to them by fostering sustainable socio-economic development while maintaining the integrity of those resources. Presently, participation in ecotourism and sustainable development is an issue of contention; mounting criticism due to lack of substantive outcomes, on the one hand, are weighed against conventional tourism characterized by the absence of community participation altogether, producing progressive discourse with the potential to revolutionize conceptualization and practice of participation. To engage with this debate, the objective of this study was to explore individual and household experiences of long-term participation in Kimana Community Wildlife Sanctuary, a former flagship ecotourism initiative in Kenya. Using secondary data, in-depth interviews, a survey, and participant observation in the community hosting the sanctuary, the study found conflicting experiences of participation, especially in the conceptualization and operation of their communal ecotourism initiative. Even though the initiative has been reported as being inclusive and profitable, the study found differentiated experiences of participation, some of which were congruent and others incongruent with the positive ecotourism outcomes previously reported for this initiative. The study advocates reflexive participation by the community together with national and local institutional changes in order to substantiate community power to impact meaningfully upon the performance of community-based ecotourism partnerships.
Article
Ecotourism is an important path to sustainable tourism that has experienced rapid development in recent years. Thus, ecological principles have been considered as the guidelines for tourism and the need to protect the eco-environment has increased substantially. On this basis, the ecotourism planning, a new paradigm for tourism planning, has emerged and it has benefits in terms of both economic development and environmental conservation. The ecotourism planning is based on two important criteria: local tourism resources and ecotourism carrying capacity. In this study, we aimed to investigate the local tourism resources and calculate the ecotourism carrying capacity of Shangri-La County as an example. The results showed that Shangri-La County has abundant tourism resources and a vast diversity of tourism products. However, the natural resources in Shangri-La County are currently being exploited beyond the carrying capacity. Solutions to this problem mainly include sustainable exploitation of tourism resources; better handling of tourism demands by improving the repartitioning of tourism flow; and the development of a digital system to facilitate the management of tourism.
Article
Tourism in the Ankarana protected area, Madagascar, has increased since the early 1990s, linked to growing national and donor interest in conservation and ecotourism. Using a qualitative and longitudinal approach, this analysis focuses on the social impacts of tourist intensification, comparing and contrasting communities on either side of the protected area. As tourist numbers have increased, infrastructure to accommodate them has developed and tour guiding has professionalized. In this process, the locus of tourism shifted from the loosely organized, “grassroots” tourism of the western side of Ankarana to the organized, externally financed, easy-access tourism of the eastern side, with both environmental and social consequences. The paper argues that a concentration and professionalization of ecotourism services within a region can marginalize neighboring human communities even though not necessarily leading to increased overall environmental degradation. It contributes to tourism studies by engaging a political ecology approach to unpack the concept of “local people” through a multi-community study of the ripple effects of ecotourism within its immediately surrounding areas. This study of community equity acknowledges the need for balanced evaluations of tourism's effects. It also recognizes the value of nuanced empirical studies for planning to meet goals of location-specific environmental and socioeconomic sustainability.