ArticlePDF Available

Social Innovation Regimes An Exploratory Framework to measure Social Innovation

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The development of social innovation indicators is a pending task in the analysis of innovative processes. There are diverse perspectives that suggest the application of indicators at different measurement levels: the individualistic approach, the regional/national approach, and the organizational approach. The present working paper promotes the notion of Social Innovation Regime (SIR) with the purpose of developing an integrated perspective of the mentioned levels through a series of Social Innovation indicators. This perspective seeks to understand the interrelationship between social innovation contexts (meso level-regional level) and social innovation dynamics (micro level-organizational level). Therefore, the SIR suggests a system of indicators to explore a new way of that measuring social innovation .
Content may be subject to copyright.
!
!
mpact
social innovation
economic foundation
empowering people
!"#$%&'()*+,"-.($%$/+(
012345(2016(-1(1(
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Social'Innovation'Regimes'
An!Exploratory!Framework!to!measure!Social!Innovation!!
!
Javier'CASTRO'SPILA,'Álvaro'LUNA'&'Alfonso'UNCETA'
March'2016!
!
!
!
!
ISSN$2365-1121$ $ !
SIMPACT$Working$Paper$Series$
Covers' research' on' the' «Economic' Foundation' of' Social' Innovation»'related' to ' theorising,' policy,' impact' as-
sessment,'foresight,'modelling'and'scenario'building.'
$
SIMPACT!!
SIMPACT' is' a' research' project' funded' under' the' European' Commission’s' 7th' Framework' Programme' from'
2014-2016'and'is'the'acronym'for'«Boosting'the'Impact'of'SI'in'Europe'through'Economic'Underpinnings».'The'
project'consortium' consists'of' twelve'European'research'institutions'and'is'led'by'the' Institute'for' Work'and'
Technology'of'the'Westphalian'University'Gelsenkirchen'in'Germany.''
$
Legal$Notice$
The'information' and'views'set'out'in'this'report'are'the' sole'responsibility'of'the'author(s)'and'do' not'neces-
sarily'reflect'the'views'of'the'European'Commission.'
'
Suggested$Citation$
Castro'Spila,'J.,'Luna,'A.'&'Unceta,'A.'(2016):'Social'Innovation'Regime.'An'Exploratory'Framework'to' measure'
Social'Innovation.'SIMPACT(Working(Paper,'2016(1).'Gelsenkirchen:'Institute'for'Work'and'Technology.'
'
'
'
'
!
!
!
'
!
6(
1(
Social(Innovation(Regimes(–((
An(Exploratory(Framework(to(measure(Social(Innovation(
Javier'CASTRO'SPILA*,'Álvaro'LUNA*'&'Alfonso'UNCETA*'
*' Sinnergiak'Social'Innovation'–'University'of'the'Basque'Country'
'
%+'"&7/("-8*(
Keywords(
Social!Innovation!
Indicators!
Measurement!
Social!Innovation!Regime!
Vulnerability!
!
JEL'
O31,!035,!I31!
%9!'+%&'(
'32(42526*172.8(*9( :*;-06(-..*508-*.( -.4-;08*+:(-:(0( 12.4-./(80:,(-.(
832( 0.06<:-:( *9( -..*508-52( 1+*;2::2:=( '32+2( 0+2( 4-52+:2( 12+:12;8-52:(
8308( :>//2:8( 832( 0116-;08-*.( *9( -.4-;08*+:( 08( 4-992+2.8( 720:>+272.8(
62526:?( 832( -.4-5-4>06-:8-;( 011+*0;3 @( 832( +2/-*.06A.08-*.06( 011+*0;3@(
0.4( 832( *+/0.-B08-*.06( 011+*0;3=( '32( 1+2:2.8( C*+,-./( 1012+( 1+*D
7*82:(832(.*8-*.(*9(!*;-06("..*508-*.(E2/-72(F!"EG(C-83(832( 1>+1*:2(
*9( 42526*1-./( 0.( -.82/+0824( 12+:12;8-52( *9( 832( 72.8-*.24( 62526:(
83+*>/3( 0( :2+-2:( *9( !*;-06( "..*508-*.( -.4-;08*+:=( '3-:( 12+:12;8-52(
:22,:( 8*( >.42+:80.4( 832( -.82++2608-*.:3-1( H28C22.( :*;-06( -..*508-*.(
;*.82I8:(F72:*( 62526(D(+2/-*.06( 62526G(0.4( :*;-06(-..*508-*.( 4<.07-;:(
F7-;+*( 62526D*+/0.-B08-*.06( 62526G=( '32+29*+2@( 832( !"E( :>//2:8:( 0( :<:D
827(*9(-.4-;08*+:(8*(2I16*+2(0(.2C(C0<(*9(8308(720:>+-./(:*;-06(-..*D
508-*.=(
!
!
Contents(
:!";<=1>3?<@1;(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(B!
B!'C5(<C=55($5=DE5?<@F5D(<1(45GD3=5(!1?@G2(";;1FG<@1;(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(B!
BA:!'C5(";>@F@>3G2(%EE=1G?C(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(B!
BAB!'C5(*=HG;@DG<@1;G2(%EE=1G?C(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(B!
BAI!'C5(+5H@1;G2J-G<@1;G2(%EE=1G?C(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(I!
BAK!7@4@<G<@1;D(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(I!
I!L;>5=D<G;>@;H(!1?@G2(";;1FG<@1;(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(I!
IA:!)CG<(@D(!1?@G2(";;1FG<@1;M(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(K!
IAB!N1O(>15D(!1?@G2("4EG?<(P(NGEE5;M(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(Q!
K!!1?@G2(";;1FG<@1;(+5H@45(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(::!
R!&1;?23>@;H(+54G=SD(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(:K(
(
%EE5;>@T("(U(+5H@1;2G(032;5=GV@2@<W(U(+5H@1;G2(X45D1(25F52Y(";>@?G<1=D(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA((:Z(
%EE5;>@T(""(U([W;G4@?D(1\(!1?@G2(";;1FG<@1;(U(*=HG;@DG<@1;G2(X4@?=1(25F52Y(";>@?G<1=D(AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA((B](
!
2(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
1 INTRODUCTION(
The!development!of!social!innovation!indicators!
is! a! blank! spot!within! innovation! studies.! In! the!
scarce! academic! and! institutional! literature! availa-
ble! there! are! three! perspectives!that! can! be! identi-
fied! through!which!the!development!of!social!inno-
vation!indicators!can! be!explored:!i)! the!individual-
ist! approach! which!measures! propensity! to! social!
entrepreneurship! among! the! adult! population;! ii)!
the!regional/national!approach!which! measures! so-
cial! innovation! contexts! and! iii)! the! organisational!
approach! which! measures! social! innovation! activi-
ties.! The! three! approaches! have! various! limitations!
and!in!some!cases!they!can!be!complementary.!
The! present! document! suggests! the! concept! of!
Social!Innovation!Regime!with!the!purpose!of!devel-
oping! an! integrated! approach! of! social! innovation!
indicators! in! order!to!understand!the!interrelation-
ship! between! social! innovation! contexts! (meso! lev-
el)!and!social!innovation!dynamics!(micro!level).!!
At!the!72:*(62526,!the!concept!of!regional!vulner-
ability!is!proposed,!which!is!modelled!in!four!dimen-
sions:!a)! social!vulnerability,! b)!institutional!vulner-
ability,! c)! economic! vulnerability! and! d)! environ-
mental! vulnerability.! The! combination! of! these! di-
mensions!allows!the!comparison!of!different!region-
al! contexts! (in! Annex! I! meso!level!indicators! are!
suggested).!
At! the! 7-;+*(62526,! it! is! proposed! the! use! of! the!
COPI! (Components,! Objectives,! Principles! and! Im-
pact)! model! defined! by! the! SIMPACT! Project! (Re-
hfeld!et! al.,!2015)! in!order!to!explore!social!innova-
tion!dynamics!(in!Annex!II!micro!level!indicators!are!
suggested).!
This! document! is! organised! in! three! sections.!
Section! 2! evaluates!the! three! approaches! towards!
social! innovation! indicators!found! in! the! literature.!
Section!3!discusses!the!concept!of! social!innovation!
and!provides! a!model! of!the! social!innovation! cycle.!
In!section!4!he!concept!of!social!innovation!regime!is!
introduced.! The! concluding! remarks! in! section! 5!
summarise!the!discussion.! In! addition,!two!annexes!
are!provided:!Annex!I!offers!a!set!of!possible!indica-
tors!in!order!to!explore!regional!vulnerability,!while!
Annex!II!offers! a!set!of!potential!indicators!in! order!
to!explore!social!innovation!dynamics.!!
!
2 THE(THREE(PERSPECTIVES(TO(MEAS-
URE(SOCIAL(INNOVATION(
Despite! strong! demand! from! policy-making! in-
stitutions,!the! development!of!innovation!indicators!
is!still!a!pending!task.!This!is!because!there!is!still!no!
wide!consensus!on!what!is!social!innovation,!which!
are! its! determining! factors,! which! are! the! most! ap-
propriate! methodologies! to! measure! and! evaluate!
social! innovation! and! the! metrics! required! for! this!
purpose.!!
In!spite!of!the!weak!development!of!social!inno-
vation!measurement!models,!there!are!three!models!
that! can! be! identified! in! the! academic! and! institu-
tional! literature! which! seek! to! develop! a! system! of!
indicators!on!social!innovation:!the!individualist!ap-
proach,!the!organisational!approach!and!the!region-
al/national!approach!(Unceta!et!al.,!2016b).!
2.1 The(Individual(Approach(
Many! authors! understand! social! entrepreneur-
ship!as!a!dimension!of!social!innovation!(Ellis,!2010,!
John! et!al.,!2000,!Alvord! et! al.,! 2003,!Maclean!et!al.,!
2013)! and! identify! :*;-06(2.8+21+2.2>+:!as! :*;-06(-.D
.*508*+:!(European!Commission,!2013).!In!this!vein,!
studies!favour! the!development!of!social!innovation!
indicators!associated!with!the!assessment!of!charac-
teristics,! motivations! and! contexts! in! which! social!
entrepreneurs! develop! their! activities! (Zahra! et! al.,!
2009).!These!works!focus!both!on!case!studies!(Sen,!
2007)! and! comparative! analyses! at! the! territorial!
level!based!on!the! Social!Entrepreneurship!Monitor!
(Harding,! 2006,! OECD/European! Commission,!
2013).!
2.2 The(Organisational(Approach(
Different! from! the! individualist! view,! this! ap-
proach! favours! organisations! as! the! field!to! under-
stand!and!evaluate!social!innovations!(SINNERGIAK,!
2013;! European! Commission,! 2012).! In! this! frame-
work,!studies!on!hybridisation!and!social!innovation!
(hybrid! structures! in! companies,! NGOs! and! public!
sector)! which! highlight! the! emergence! and! govern-
ance! of! new! business! models! aimed! at! social! inter-
ests! and! purposes! stand! out! (Battilana! et! al.,! 2012;!
Grassl,! 2012;! Grohs,! 2014;! Pestoff,! 2015;! cf.! Ter-
striep,! et! al.! 2015).! Within! the! organisational! ap-
proach,!studies!which! highlight! the!development!of!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(3(
organisational! capacities! for! social! innovation! can!
also!be!found! (Castro!Spila!&! Unceta,!2015).!In! this!
vein,! the! pilot! Project! RESINDEX! (Regional! Social!
Innovation! Index;! SINNERGIAK,! 2013)! develops! a!
model!based!on!the!organisations’!absorptive!capac-
ity.! The! model! offers! a! system! of! indicators! which!
allow!the!differentiation!between!potential!and!real-
ised! capacity! for! social! innovation! in! four! kinds! of!
regional! organisations:! companies,! NGOs,! universi-
ties! and! research! centres.! This! model! also! explores!
the! characteristics! of! the! social! innovation! projects!
developed!by!these! organisations!and! discusses!the!
results! obtained! at! regional! and! organisational! lev-
els!(SINNERGIAK,!2013).!
2.3 The(Regional/National(Approach(
Finally,! it! is! important! to! consider! the! move-
ment! promoted! by! European! policy! makers! which!
requires! the!development!of!social! innovation! indi-
cators! at! meso-macro! level! (regional/national)!
which! integrates!data! from! different! European!sta-
tistical! sources! to! obtain! a! set! of! comparable! and!
agreeable! indicators! (Krlev! et! al.,! 2014).! Along! this!
line,! the! European! FP7! project! TEPSIE!has! devel-
oped! a! model! to! measure! social! innovation.! The!
model! specifies! three! levels! of! measurement:! (a)!
Framework!conditions;!(b)!Entrepreneurial!activity;!
(c)!Field-specific!outcome!and!output;!and!discusses!
the! results! obtained! from! measuring! social! innova-
tion!(Krlev!et!al.,!2014).!
2.4 Limitations(
All!these!approaches! have! both!conceptual!and!
methodological! limitations.! Thus,! the! individualist!
approach!makes!it!possible!to!estimate!the!degree!of!
social! commitment! of! the! adult! population! (region!
or! country)! and! becomes! a! relevant! estimation! in!
order!to! explore!the!social!potential!of! social!entre-
preneurships.! However,! this! approach! focused! on!
social! entrepreneurships! has! limitations! to! under-
stand! and! measure! social! innovation! activities.! The!
first! one! is! a! conceptual! limitation.! Indeed ,! this! ap-
proach!reduces!social!innovation!to!social!entrepre-
neurship! although! they! are! two! different!universes!
both! from! the! point! of! view! of! the! enterpris-
ing/innovative!agency!and!its!means,!and!the!neces-
sary! skills! and! impact! that! needs! to! be! achieved!
(Groot! &! Dankbaar,! 2014;! Phills! et! al.,! 2008).! The!
second!limitation!refers! to!the!unit! of!analysis!used!
to! measure.! The! focus! on! social! enterprising! indi-
viduals! is! limited! in! order! to! explore! the! organisa-
tional! and! territorial! dynamics! of! social! innovation!
although! it! can! provide! a! good! image! on! the! active!
social!commitment!of!a!particular!population.!
The!regional/national!approach!has!a!methodo-
logical! limitation! because! the! use! of! secondary!
sources!is!based!on! surveys! and!information!which!
do! not! directly! refer! to! social! innovation! activities.!
Indicators!that!can!be!produced!in!this!approach!are!
indicators! of! the! environment! of! social! innovation,!
this!means!they!give!an!account!of!the!economic,!so-
cial,! political,! cultural! and! technological! environ-
ment! in! which!social! innovations! are!produced! but!
they!do!not!strictly!measure!social!innovations.!
The! organisational! approach! is! the! most! accu-
rate! one! to! measure! social! innovation! activities.!
Technological! innovation! indicators! are! produced!
from! this! organisational! dimension! and! evidence!
shows! the! importance! and! appropriateness! of! fa-
vouring! organisations! over! other! units! of! analysis!
and!sources!of!information! in! order! to!measure!in-
novative! activities! (OECD,! 2005).! At! the! organisa-
tional! level! it! is! possible! to! make! conceptual! and!
methodological! dimensions! coherent! in! order! to!
measure! social! innovation! activities.! However,! the!
construction! of! indicators! at! this! level! leaves! the!
question! of! the! regional! and! local! environments! in!
which!social!innovations!are!produced!unsolved.!
Given! these! limitations,! the! production! of! a!
common!set!of!social!innovation! indicators!involves!
the! conceptual,! methodological! development! and!
the! empirical! validation! of! an! integrated! model! be-
tween! micro! (organisational)! and! meso! (regional)!
levels! that! give! an! account! of! social! innova tion! dy-
namics!and!contexts.! The!following!section!contrib-
utes!to! the!exploration!of!an!integrated!approach!of!
social!innovation!within!the!framework!of! the! SIM-
PACT!Project.!
3 UNDERSTANDING(SOCIAL(INNOVATION(
Developing! a! social! innovation! measurement!
model! always! involves! a! conceptualisation! that!an-
swers! at! least! four! basic! questions! operationally!to!
guide!the!development!of!indicators.!
)308(-:(:*;-06(-..*508-*.J!This! question!is!basic!
since! it! establishes! the! demarcation! line!between!
innovative! (and! scales! of! innova tion! intensity)! and!
4(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
non-innovative! actors.! But! also! provides!guidance!
on!the!main!factors!that!organise!a!social!innovation!
as!well!as!its!results.!In!this!regard,!countless!defini-
tions! of! social! innovation!are! available.! Some! of!
which!are!more!operational! and!others!that!are!ra-
ther!theoretical! and! general.! The! latter!do! not! pro-
vide!guidance!for!the!development!of!indicators,!alt-
hough!they!can!be!useful!to!understand!the!sense!of!
social! innovation! and! its! differences! with! regard! to!
other! types! of! innovation.! Operational! definitions!
lose!the!richness!and!complexity! of!conceptual!defi-
nitions,!while!their!empirical!capacity!improves.!
)3*(<-264:(:*;-06( -..*508-*.J!This! question! es-
tablishes! the! unit! of! analysis! and! information! on!
which! social! innovation! is! advocated! (e.g.!regions,!
communities,! organisations,! individuals).! Again,! in!
social! innovation! studies! there! are! very! different!
views!on!who! develops! social!innovations!(Cajaiba-
Santana,! 2014;! Castro-Spila! et! al.,! 2015;! European!
Commission,! 2010,! 2011,! 2013;! Goldenberg,! 2010).!
In!general,!the!academic! and! institutional!literature!
distinguishes!corporate! actors! (the! list! of! these! ac-
tors!tends!to!be!extensive)!and!non-corporate!actors!
(e.g.!social!movements,!social!innovation! communi-
ties,!etc.).!The!analysis!and!information!units!are!re-
lated! to! data! sources! (statistical! series)! or! to! the!
possibility! of! producing!data! (implementing! ad! hoc!
social! innovation! questionnaires).! Therefore,! any!
indicator!system!has!to!clearly!define!who!is!the!so-
cial!innovation! agent!that!can!be!empirically! «inter-
rogated».! This! requirement! makes! it! necessary! to!
make!a!pragmatic!choice!on!the!analysis!unit!which,!
in! many! cases,! has! to! leave! out! c ountless! potential!
agents!that!may!be!conceptually!relevant!but!empir-
ically!are!not!likely!to!be!identified!and!incorporated!
into!an!indicator!system.!
K*C( -:( :*;-06( -..*508-*.( 7042J!The! answer! to!
this! question! is! not! simple! since! it! depends! on! the!
definition! (what! is! social! innovation),! the! chosen!
unit! of! analysis! (who! makes! social! innovation)! and!
the! data! available.! Although! useful! for! the! qualita-
tive! understanding! of! social! innovation,! available!
models! often! recommend! social! innovation! factors!
which! are! difficult! to! measure! quantitatively.! As!
highlighted!in!the!previous!section,!there!is!a!tension!
between! exploring! secondary! sources! in! order! to!
elaborate! comparable! indicators! at! regional/natio-
nal!level!(which!do!not! strictly!measure!social!inno-
vation! activities,! but! the! production! context),! and!
building! primary! sources! that!m easure!social! inno-
vation!(according!to!the!definition!and!analysis!unit)!
but!which! have!the!problem!of!(time!and!geograph-
ical)!comparability.!
)3-;3( +2:>68:( 4*( :*;-06( -..*508-*.:( 3052J!The!
impact! of! social! innovation! is! perhaps! the! most!
complex! part! to! measure!and! understand! both,! in!
qualitative! and! quantitative! terms.! Again,! social! in-
novation! results! depend! on! the! definition,! analysis!
unit!and!available! data.! However,! a! first! distinction!
between! social! innovation’s! «impact»! and! «effects»!
can!be!made.!In!the!first!case,!they!are!direct!and!ex-
pected!results!of! a!social!innovation!activity!in!a!de-
termined!period!of!time! (such!as!the!results!of!a!so-
cial! innovation! project).! The! second! case! concerns!
the!social!diffusion! of!social! innovation,!i.e.,! positive!
and!negative!externalities!of!social!innovation!activi-
ties! at! the! regional! and! non-regional! levels! whose!
temporariness! exceeds! the!objectives!and!time!of! a!
specific! social! innovation! activity.! The! relationship!
between!impact!and!effect!from!the!point!of!view!of!
measurement!is!related!to!the!level!of!control!of!in-
novative!activities’!results.!Impact!can!be!controlled,!
while!effects!cannot.!
In! line! with! these! criteria,! a! first! measurement!
of!social!innovation!is!suggested,!based!on!an!opera-
tional! definition,!i.e.,!a! definition! of! the! actors! that!
promote! social! innovations,! its! core!elements! and!
impacts!as!well!as!the!social!innovation.!
3.1 What(is(Social(Innovation?(
In! order! to! offer! an! integrated! model! of! meas-
urement!of!social!innovation,!the!operational!defini-
tion! developed! by! the! SIMPACT! project! is! used.! It!
defines!social!innovation!as:!
LMNO(0(.*526(;*7H-.08-*.(*9(-420:(0.4(
4-:8-.;8(9*+7:(*9(;*660H*+08-*.(8308(
8+0.:;2.4(2:80H6-:324(-.:8-8>8-*.06(;*.D
82I8:(C-83(832(2992;8(*9(271*C2+-./(0.4(
F+2DG2./0/-./(5>6.2+0H62(/+*>1:(2-832+(
-.(832(1+*;2::(*9(:*;-06(-..*508-*.(*+(0:(
0(+2:>68(*9(-8=P(
(Rehfeld!et!al.,!2015)!
!
This!definition!strengthens! the!relationship!be-
tween! institutional! context,! social! innovation! dy-
namics,! objectives! and! impact.! With! regard! to! the!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(5(
context! and! dynamics,! the! definition! specifies! the!
knowledge! and! collaboration! relationships! neces-
sary!to!generate!products! and! processes!capable!of!
transcending!established!institutional!contexts,!that!
is,!overcoming! barriers!to!social!integration!(social,!
institutional,!economic!and!environmental!barriers).!
Regarding!the!social!innovation’s!objectives,!the!def-
inition!focuses!on! vulnerable!groups!in! society!with!
the! aim! of! empowering! and! re-including! th em! in! a!
social!standard!considered!acceptable!by!the!institu-
tional! context! in! which! social! innovation! is! pro-
duced.!The!condition!for!a!standard’s!acceptability!is!
linked! to! a! specific! social,! economic,! political! and!
environmental! configuration! within! an! institutional!
context.!
Social!innovations!express!then!an!answer!to!lo-
cal! conditions! of! exclusion! and! marginalisation! of!
!"#$%&'(#%)groups.!Therefore,!the!degree!of!!"#$%&*
'(+#+,-)(causes,!conditions!and!integrative!solutions)!
may!vary!from!an!institutional!context!to!another!as!
well! as! do! its! innovative! responses.! Figure! 1! illus-
trates! the! main! dimensions! of! social! innovation! es-
tablished! by! SIMPACT’s!operational! definition! (Re-
hfeld!et!al.,!2015).!
!
!
Figure'1.' Social'Innovation'as'empowerment'&(re-)engaging'
vulnerable'groups'
.$/,+,",+0$'#)10$,%2,)
Under!this!scheme,!the!institutional!context!has!
a! twofold! bearing.! On! the! one! hand,! institutional!
context! refers! to!the! interaction! of! political,! social,!
economic!and!environmental!conditions!which!sub-
stantiate! obstacles! to! the! social! integration! of! vul-
nerable!groups.!On!the!other!hand,!the!same!institu-
tional!context!creates!the!conditions!(drivers)!which!
facilitate! the! emergence! of!social! innovations,! i.e.,!
products!and!processes!which!develop!inclusion!ac-
tions.! Vulnerable!groups! are! affected!by! different!
kinds!of!exclusion!(cultural,!technological,!economic,!
social,!political,!etc.)!and!this!is!why!the!combination!
inclusion/exclusion! is! related! to! the! social! innova-
tion!modes! (Castro-Spila!&!Unceta,!2015).!That! is!to!
say,! the! multiplicity! of! ways! and! mechanisms!
through!which!socially!innovative!products!and!pro-
cesses! promote! the! inclusion! and! empowerment! of!
vulnerable!groups.!
The!concept!of!the!institutional!context!as!a!«fa-
cilitator»! of! social! innovations! as! well! as! «origina-
tor»!of! exclusions! and! marginalisation! suggests! a!
complex! relationship! between! different! types! of!
vulnerabilities!and!different!modes! of!social!innova-
tion.! As! is! shown!below,! the! institutional! context!
may! be! observed! as! an! environment! characterised!
by!four!kinds!of!!"#$%&'(+#+,+%/:!social,!institutional,!
economic!and!environmental,!which!create!the!ena-
bling!conditions!for!the!development!of!different!so-
cial!innovation!modes,!in!other!words,!several!prod-
ucts,! processes! and! mechanisms! of! empowerment!
and! social! integration.! The! relationships! between!
the!;*.82I8!and!4<.07-;:!of!social!innovation!consti-
tute!social! innovation! regimes! which!are!at! the! the!
core!of!this!contribution.!
3$04#%56%)
Social! innovations! are! the! result! of! novel! combina-
tions!of!knowledge!necessary!to!develop!viable!solu-
tions!to!the!complex!problems!of!integration!and!in-
clusion! of! vulnerable! groups.! Knowledge! is! the! or-
ganisations’!intangible!asset!and!it!refers!to!the!pro-
cesses! and! mechanisms! of! interpretation,! assimila-
tion,!recombination!and!exploitation!of! internal!and!
external! knowledge!to! implement! social! innova-
tions,! i.e.,! an! organisation’s! absorptive! capacities!
(Cohen! &! Levithal,! 1990;! Lane,! Koka! &! Pathak,!
2006).! From! this! point! of! view,! it! can! be! said! that!
social!innovations!set-up! epistemic!interventions!of!
interpretation! and! solution! of! social! problems! (Un-
ceta!et!al.,!2016a).!
10##'(0&',+0$/)
Social!innovations! are!collective!processes.!This!
statement! suggests! that! innovations! promote! coop-
eration!and!participation!processes.!In!the!first!case,!
cooperation! is! understood! as! the! process! in! which!
two! or! more! different! actors! share! information,!
knowledge!and!resources!to!develop!common!objec-
tives.! They! are! organisational! alliances.! In! the! se-
Institutional Context Institutional Context
DriversObjectives
Principles
Components
Barriers
Collaboration
Knowledge
Social Innovation Vulnerable
Process
Product
Inclusive
Action
6(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
cond! case,!participation!is!understood! as! processes!
and! mechanisms! from! which! the! target! population!
(marginalised!groups)! is! included! in! the! different!
phases! of! a! social! innovation!process.! Cooperation!
and!participation!processes!may!also!be! understood!
as! governance! dimensions! (corporate! and! social)!
which!constitutes!a!central!element!of!social!innova-
tions’! sustainability! (Castro-Spila! &! Unceta,! 2015;!
Rehfeld!et!al.,!2014).!
7"#$%&'(#%)8&0"9/)
Vulnerable!groups!are!all!those!who,!by!virtue!of!
their! age,! race,! sex,! economic! and! social! condition,!
physical! characteristics! and! cultural! and! political!
circumstances,!are!facing!obstacles!for!their!integra-
tion!in!a!determined!institutional!context.!
Social! innovators!develop! products,! processes!
and! services! linked! to! the! development! of! social!
competences!(empowerment)!within!these!vulnera-
ble! groups! in! order! to! reduce! their! vulnerability,!
that! is,! the! degree! of! exposure! to! the! risk! of! struc-
tural!exclusion.!
:&+!%&/;<'&&+%&/)
In! its! operational! definition,! the! SIMPACT! pro-
ject!provides!an! approach!to!identify!drivers!for!so-
cial!innovation,!in!other!words,!the!factors!that!pro-
mote!social!innovations!(figure! 1).!The! relationship!
between! drivers!and! barriers! of! social! innovation!
may! be! considered! as! an! inverse! relationship! ac-
cording! to! which! the! higher! the! drivers,! the! fewer!
the! barriers! and! vice! versa.! Understanding! social!
innovation!drivers! and! barriers! as! an! indivisible!
pairing! allows! us! to! analytically!emphasise! social!
innovation! dynamics.! These! are!understood! as! the!
examination!(experimentation!and!learning),!exploi-
tation! (prototyping! and! development),! evaluation!
(measurement!of!the!impact)!and!expansion!(escala-
tion!and!sustainability)! capacities!that!key!actors!in!
social!innovation!have!in!order!to!overcome!barriers!
of!several! kinds.!In! this!sense,!social!innovation! is!a!
process!of!overcoming! and! changing! existing!barri-
ers!in!a!specific!institutional!context.!
3.2 How(does(Social(Impact(happen?(
Social!innovation!can! be! understood! as!a!cyclic!
process.! The!cycle! concept! suggests! that! the! devel-
opment! of! an! innovative! activity! goes! through! dif-
ferent! successive! phases! considered! necessary! for!
the! innovative! process! to! take! place! (European!
Commission,! 2013;! Santos! et! al.,! 2013;! Mulgan,!
2006).!
Only!few! contributions!on!the! analysis! of!social!
innovation! cycles! are! found! in! the!literature,! while!
the!proposed!models!differ!in!the!number!of!phases.!
According! to! the! European! Commission!(2013:! 6),!
for! example,! the! social! innovation! cycle! comprises!
four! successive! phases,! where! scaling! up! social! in-
novation!is!the!final!stage!and!one!of!the! main!aims!
of!social!innovation.!
Identification!of! new/unmet/inadequately! met!
social!needs;!
Development! of! new! solutions! in! response! to!
these!social!needs;!
Evaluation!of!the!effectiveness!of! new!solutions!
in!meeting!social!needs;!
Scaling!up!of!effective!social!innovations.!
!
Murray!and! colleagues!(2010)!suggest!a!life! cy-
cle!of!six!stages,!where!producing!systemic!change!is!
the!ultimate!goal!of!a!social!innovation!(figure!2):!
Prompts,! inspirations! and! diagnoses:! in! this!
phase,!factors,!which!underline!the!need!for!so-
cial!innovation,!are!structured.!
Proposals! and! ideas:! in! this! phase,! ideas! and!
proposals!of!a!solution!to!the!identified!problem!
are!structured.!
Prototyping! and! pilots:! in! this!phase,! ideas! are!
implemented! from! the! process! of! prototyping!
and!pilot!experiences.!
Sustaining:! in! this! phase,! support! is! sought! in!
order! to! give! experiences!sustainability! (com-
panies,!projects,!laboratories,!etc).!
Scaling! and! diffusion:! in! this! phase,! what! is!
sought! is! scaling! innovations,!diffusing! results!
and!facilitating!innovation!by!imitation.!
Systemic!change:!this!is!the!final!stage! of!social!
innovation! and! it!implies!including!social!inno-
vation!in!a!system!of!interactions!with!other!in-
novations!and!other!social!actions.!The!systemic!
change! suggests! an! architecture,! which! gives!
support! to! other! innovations!(for! a! critical! re-
view!see!Terstriep!et!al.,!2015).!
!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(7(
!
Figure'2.' Six'Stages'of'Social'Innovation'(Murray'et'al.,'2010)'
!
As!can!be!drawn! from! the! outlined! models,!so-
cial! innovation! cycles! are! described! from! the!per-
spective! of! successful! innovation!with! an! emphasis!
on! the! scaling! capacity! as! one! of! the! main! success!
measures.! Alternatively,! the! authors! propose!a!life!
cycle!scheme!which!interprets!the!social!innovation!
as! an! open-ended!process.! Such! approach!relates!
drivers!to!barriers!with!the!ultimate!aim!to!subsume!
the!innovation!in!the!mainstream!of!the!institutional!
context!in! which!innovation! is!produced.! Under!this!
scheme,! scaling! social! innovations! is! just! an! exter-
nality,!it! is!neither!an!aim!in!itself!nor!a!measure! of!
success.!
Accounting!for!innovative!failure! allows! for!the!
design! of! appropriate! policies! for! the! different!mo-
ments!of!the!innovative!process.!This! is!particularly!
important!as!each!phase!in!the!development!process!
involves! different! obstacles! (barriers)! and!necessi-
tates!distinctive!capacities! (drivers)! to! overcome!
related!obstacles.!The! scheme!proposed!starts! from!
a!set!of!assumptions:!
=//">9,+0$) ?@!Social! innovations! are! context!
specific,!i.e.,!they!are! produced! in! determined! insti-
tutional!contexts.! Contexts!express!social,!economic,!
political! and! environmental! conditions!which! are!
the!result!of! a! specific!and!endogenous!paths! of! re-
gional! development.! The! institutional! context! func-
tions! within! the! framework! of! a! particular! main-
stream! which! refers! to! the! set! of! resources! and!
knowledge! an! institutional! context! has! in! order! to!
manage! and! solve! distinct! problems! (political,! eco-
nomic,!social,!environmental).!Thus,!the!mainstream!
operates!as!a!paradigm! (a! network! of!policies!with!
an! epistemic! community)1!that! shares! a! hegemonic!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
1!! The! concept! of! networks! of! policies! (Agranoff! &! McGuire,!
2001;!Klijn!&!Koppenjan,!2000)!refers! to!the!articulation!of!
vision! on! the! characterisation! of! the! problems! and!
the! range! of! possible! solutions! to! solve! them! in! an!
acceptable!way!for!a!particular!welfare!standard.!!
=//">9,+0$)A:!Social!innovations! are!not!struc-
tured! around! the! solution! of! social! problems! but!
around!the! resolution!of! anomalies.!An! anomaly!ex-
presses! a! kind! of! social! problem! that! cannot! be!
solved! with! the! resources! and! knowledge! available!
in! the! mainstream.! Thus,! the! an omaly! is! expressed!
as!the!point!of!origin!of!a!social!innovation,!i.e.,!a!so-
cial! problem! that! summarises! changes! considered!
negative! in! the! social,! economic,!political! and! envi-
ronmental! conditions! of! a! particular! institutional!
context! and! whose! mainstream! cannot! solve.! Not!
every!social!problem!is! an! anomaly.! In! general,!the!
mainstream!offers!acceptable!solutions!to!a!diversi-
ty! of! social! problems! arising! from! the! dynamics! of!
inclusion/exclusion! produced! in!the! institutional!
context.! The! solutions’! degree! of! acceptability! de-
pends! on! the! moment! and! institutional! context! in!
question.! An! anomaly2!is! such,! as! long! as! there! is! a!
persistent! situation! of! exclusion! (economic,! social,!
cultural,! institutional,! technological! exclusion,! etc.)!
that!is!unacceptable!for!a!relevant!part!of!the!institu-
tional! context.! The! anomaly! creates! dynamics! of!
vulnerability!for!one!or!more!different!social!groups.!
Thus,! the! greater! the! divergence! of!social! groups’!
impairment!caused!by! the! anomaly,! the! higher! is!
their!negative!effect,!the!higher!the!difficulty!to!find!
innovative! solutions! and!the!greater!the! urgency! to!
find!these!solutions.!!
=//">9,+0$)B:!Social!innovations!are!guided!by!
the! search! for! sustainability! of! their! processes! and!
impacts.! Sustainability! must! be! understood! as! the!
vector!that!seeks! to!stabilise!an! innovative!solution!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
public! policy! objectives! with! the! objectives! of! innovative!
companies,! knowledge! institutions! (in! particular! technolo-
gical! ones),! social! agents! and! political! parties.! In! this! way,!
the!design!of!policies!and!their!instruments!seek!to!align!the!
agents! around! long-term! strategic! regional! objectives.! The!
concept!of!epistemic! community,! in!this! case,! refers!to!the!
cognitive!paradigm!behind!the!networks! of!policies!accord-
ing!to! which!one! way!of! interpreting!problems! and!guiding!
their!solutions!is!hegemonic.!
2!! The!development!of!some! dynamics!of!inclusion/exclusion!
that! are! found! in! the! path! of! the! institutional! context! may!
lead!to!anomalies,!and!some!can!be!predicted!by!stipulating!
scenarios.!Thus,!for!instance,!in!some! institutional!contexts,!
the!current! problems!of!the!ageing!population! are!manage-
able!by!the! mainstream!but!in!the!long!run!they!tend!to!be-
come! an! anomaly.! The! same! can! be! said! of! some! environ-
mental!dynamics.!
1
Prompts
2
Proposals
3
Prototypes
4
Sustaining
5
Scaling
6
Systemic
Change
8(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
in! the! long! term! which! modifie s! the! causes! and! ef-
fects! of! an! anomaly.! The! principle! regulating! this!
vector!is! the!expectation! of!making! innovative!solu-
tions!part!of!the!routine!in!the!mainstream!of!a!par-
ticular!institutional!context.!This!suggests!that!social!
innovations!seek!in!their!sustainability!to!stop!being!
social!innovations.! When!a!social!innovation!is!inte-
grated!in!the!mainstream!it!does!it!in!terms!of!a!per-
formative! integration,! this! is,! a! transformation! by!
integration! that! modifies! the! para digm,! which! now!
has!routine!(normal)! solutions.! In!the!performative!
integration,! what! used! to! be! an! anomaly! is! now! a!
social! problem! for! which! the! new! mainstream! has!
acceptable!solutions.!!
=//">9,+0$)C:!Social! innovations! have!a!linear!
trajectory3!towards! performative! integration.! The!
principle!regulating! this!linear!vector! is!the! inverse!
relationship!between!the!pairing!driver/barrier.!The!
social! innovations! considered! as! an! evolutionary!
process! imply! a! heterogeneity! of! competences! for!
the!overcoming!of!a!diversity!of!barriers,!which!have!
the! capacity! of! making! a! social! innovation! fail.! To!
understand!the!social!innovation!in! terms!of! a!cycle!
allows!us!then! to! understand!the!necessary!drivers!
to! promote! innovations! according! to! different! mo-
ments!of! their!development,!what!guides! the! policy!
making!to!develop!fields!of!exploration!of!innovative!
solutions! to! the! anomalies! of! the! institutional! con-
text.!
In! the! light! of! these! assumptions,! a! model! of! a!
social! innovation’s! cycle! according! to! four! main!
phases!is! proposed.! Each! phase! implies! a! relation-
ship! between! driver,! barrier! and! impact.! As! shown!
in!figure!2,!the! scheme! suggests!two!different!insti-
tutional! contexts! (institutional! context! 1! and! 2).! In!
the!first!context,! we!explain!the!cycle! of!a!social! in-
novation!(linear!model)!which!goes!from!the!anoma-
ly!created!in! a!mainstream!(1)! towards! the!integra-
tion! of! innovative! solutions! in! a! new! mainstream!
(2).!This!means,!the!change!of!the!mainstream!by!an!
expansive! effect! of! a! social! innovation.! For! each!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
3!! Social!innovations!have!a!non-linear!and!interactive!nature.!
However,! for! the! purposes! of! conceptual! exploration! (to!
guide!the!empirical! research!and! production! of!indicators)!
it!is!assumed! as! a!linear! model! structured! in!phases! of! se-
quential! development! that! enables! the! identification! of!
drivers/barriers!and!impacts!of!social!innovation.!
'
'
phase! within! the! linear! model! it! is! suggested! that!
there!are! drivers!(D)! and!barriers! (B).!At! the!higher!
end!of!the!figure!it!is!suggested!that!a!social!innova-
tion! developed! in! an! institutional! context! 1! can! be!
transferred!to!an!institutional!context!2.!The!scheme!
indicates!that! scaling!a!social!innovation!is!an!exter-
nality!and!that!the!main!objective!of!a!social!innova-
tion! is! to! resolve! (interacting! with! it! during! the!
whole! cycle)! and! integrate! an! innovative! solution!
into!the!mainstream!transforming!it!by!colonisation.!
DE%)=$0>'#-)
An!anomaly!(A)!expresses!a!kind!of!social!prob-
lem! that! cannot! be! solved! with! the! resources! and!
knowledge!available!in! the! mainstream.!In!the! pro-
posed!scheme,!the!anomaly!is!expressed!as!the!point!
of!origin!of!a!social!innovation,!this!is,!a!social!prob-
lem!that!generates! vulnerabilities!(social,!economic,!
political! and! environmental)! for! which! the! main-
stream! does! not! have! the! appropriate! answers.! A!
social!problem! is!such!as!long!as!it!is!persistent!and!
creates! dynamics! of! vulnerability! for! one! or! more!
different!social!groups.! Thus,! the!more!heterogene-
ous! the! affected! social! groups! are,! the! higher! the!
anomaly’s! impact,! the! higher! the! difficulty! to! find!
innovative! solutions! and!the!greater!the! urgency! to!
find!these!solutions.!!
DE%)F%/90$/%/)0G),E%).$/,+,",+0$'#)10$,%2,)H>'+$*
/,&%'>)?I))
There! are! three! kinds! of! responses! to! an! anomaly:!
(a)!the! non! response.! This! means:! the! institutional!
context! does! not! answer! to! the! vulnerability! prob-
lems! created! by! the! anomaly! and! le ts! the! problem!
persist! (this! option! is! related! to! the! costs! of! inac-
tion);!(b)!the!inadequate!response.!This! means:! the!
institutional!context!gives!a!response!to!the!anomaly!
with! inadequate!resources! and! solution! criteria! for!
the! social! problem! and! therefore! the! problem! per-
sists! although! some! of! its! impacts! may! be! reduced!
(this! option! is! related! to! knowledge! asymmetries!
and!the!costs!of!action);!(c)!the!innovative!response.!
The!institutional!context!provides!a!new!response!to!
the!anomaly.!
!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(9(
!
Figure'3.' Lifecycle'of'Social'Innovation'
!
Thus,!social!innovation!can!reduce!the!impact!of!
the!problem!and!resolve!the!conditions!linked!to!the!
production! of! the! anomaly! and! mitigate! its! conse-
quences.! However,! innovative! responses! may! fail!
due!to!the!context’s! resistance!(social,!institutional,!
economic,! cultural! resistance,! etc.)! in! any! of! the!
phases!of!a! social!innovation.!This! way,!three! kinds!
of!failures!in!the!response!(resolution)!to!an!anoma-
ly!can!be!identified.!
(a) Q0-6>+2(H<( -.0;8-*.?!when! the! institutional! con-
text! does! not! give! a! response! to! the! anomaly!
and! the!problem! increases! and! develops.! This!
failure! is! linked! to! the! barriers! of! Type! 1! (B1,!
figure!3).!
(b) Q0-6>+2( H<( -.042R>0;<?!when! the! institutional!
context!gives!a! non-innovative! response! that! is!
inadequate! to!resolve!the!anomaly.!This!failure!
is!linked!to!the!barriers!of!Type!2!(B2,!figure!3).!
(c) Q0-6>+2( H<( -..*508-*.?!when! the! institutional!
context! offers! an! innovative! response! (social!
innovation)! that! is! adequate! to! resolve! an!
anomaly! but! the! innovative! process! does! not!
succeed!in! overcoming!the!barriers!imposed!by!
the!institutional!context.! This!failure!has! differ-
ent!barriers!according!to!the!phase!in!which!the!
process!of! social!innovation!is!situated!(B3,!B4,!
B5,!B6!and!B7,!figure!3).!
J0K+'#)L&0,0*.$$0!',+0$)
This!phase!of! social!innovation!is! characterised!
by!a!process!of! divergent! interpretation!and!a!con-
vergent!proposal!of!innovative!ideas!to!design!a!sus-
tainable!solution.!The!prefix!«proto»! suggests!that!it!
is!a!social!innovation! in! its!potential!form.!This! is! a!
phase! of! reflective' action!on! the! conditions! in!
which! the! anomaly! is!produced,! replicates! and! im-
pacts!on!the!vulnerable!groups.!In!this!phase,!organ-
isations! mobilise! essentially! three! types! of! capaci-
ties:!(a)!capacities!of! interpretation!and!acquisition!
of! heterogeneous! knowledge;! (b)! capacities! of!
knowledge! integration! and! modelling! of! ideas! (de-
sign);!(c)!capacities!of!connection!with!stakeholders!
(in!figure!3,! these!drivers!are! identified!as!D1).!The!
main!impacts!that!can!be!expected!in!this!phase!are!
related!to!the!modelling!of!solutions,!conceptual!and!
methodological! designs,! development! of! networks!
with!vulnerable!groups!and!with!other!organisations!
concerned! by! the! same! anomaly! for! the! identifica-
tion! of! causal! hypotheses! and! innovative! solutions.!
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
Inaction Inadequacy
A
Proto-SI
Explorative SI
Expansive SI
Meta-SI
Scaling-up SI
P
E
R
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
V
E
I
N
T
E
G
R
A
G
I
O
N
I
N
C
R
E
M
E
N
T
A
L
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
T
E
S
T
I
N
G
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
S
E
A
R
C
H
I
N
G
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
MAINSTREAM 2
MAINSTREAM 1 SOCIAL INNOVATION
INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT 1
A = Anomaly
B = Barrier
D = Driver
SI = Social Innovation
INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT 1 INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT 2
10(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
In!this!phase,!the!prototyping!of!potentially!effective!
ideas!to!solve!the!social! problem!that!represents!an!
anomaly! prevails.! Proto-innovations! fail! when! they!
cannot!model!ideas!and!go!on!to!the!exploration!and!
testing!phase!(in!figure! 3,! these!barriers!are! identi-
fied!as!B3).!It!is!a!creative!failure.!
M29#0&',+!%)J0K+'#).$$0!',+0$)
The! explorative!phase! is! characterised! by! the!
implementation! of! experimentation! processes.! So-
cial!innovation!has!already!been!modelled!in!its!pre-
vious!phase!and!is! tested.! This! is!a!phase! of! &%K"&*
/+!%),%/,+$6!of!the!causal!hypothesis!and!the!innova-
tive! solution! in! a! practical,! systemic! and! planned!
way.!In!this!phase!of!social!experimentation!organi-
sations!mobilise!essentially!three!types!of!capacities:!
(a)! capacities! of! exploration! and! recombination! of!
acquired!knowledge;!(b)!capacities!of!evaluation!and!
systematisation;! (c)! capacities! of! connection! with!
stakeholders.!Social!innovations!can!remain!during!a!
long! period! in! this! experimental! phase! generating!
innovative! evidence! without! be ing! able! to! model! a!
social! innovation.! However,! at! this! experimental!
stage! there! are! diversifications! by! interaction! (new!
ideas,! practices! and! externalities)! w hich! can! result!
in!other!innovative!ideas!(social! proto-innovations).!
This! phase! can! be! considered! as! social! innovation!
since! social! experiments! are! piloted,! and! therefore,!
there!is!a! level!of!impact! and!empowerment!of!vul-
nerable! groups.! Explorative! social! innovations! fail!
when!they!cannot!overcome!the!barriers!that!hinder!
passing! from! the! experimentation! to! the! modelling!
of!social!innovations!(in!figure! 3,!these!barriers! are!
identified!as!B4).!
M29'$/+!%)J0K+'#).$$0!',+0$)
This!phase!is! characterised!by! the! implementa-
tion! of! continuous! improvements! to! the! model! of!
social!innovation.!Innovation!has!already!been!mod-
elled,! tested! and! evaluated.! It! is! a! phase! based! on!
+$K&%>%$,'#) +$$0!',+0$.! In!this! phase,! a! body! of!
empirical! evidence! has! been! integrated! in! a! tested!
model!that!is!able!to!transform!resources!into!capac-
ities.! Incremental! innovations! do! not! only! explain!
the!anomaly!(divergent!interpretation)!but!they!also!
offer! a! way! to! intervene! (convergent! practices)! to!
resolve!the!anomaly!either!from!its!causes!or!by!mit-
igating! part! of! its! consequences.! T he! characteristic!
of! this! phase! is! the! expansion! of! solutions,! this!
means,!the! regular!implementation!of!innovation!in!
the! problems! of! the! same! nature! within! the! same!
context! (scaling-deep;! Santos! et! al.,! 2013).! In! this!
phase,! organisations! mobilise! following! capacities:!
(a)!capacities! of!knowledge! exploitation;!(b)! capaci-
ties! of! social! and! institutional! diffusion;! (c)! capaci-
ties!of!scaling-up!of!social!innovations.!In!this!phase,!
the! impact! of! social! innovation! is! increased! (either!
processes!of!scaling-deep!or!scaling-up)!and!it!grad-
ually! permeates! the! mainstream’s! network! of! poli-
cies!and!epistemic! communities!from!verifiable!and!
measurable!evidence!in!a!countless!number!of!cases!
which!show!the!model’s!effectiveness!to!solve!or!re-
duce!the!anomaly!and/or!its!effects.!
N%,')J0K+'#).$$0!',+0$)H>'+$/,&%'>)AI)
In!this!phase,! social!innovation!is! a!trace.!It! has!
been! integrated! in! the! mainstream! transforming! it!
and!improving!its!institutional!and!cognitive!compe-
tences! to! provide! satisfactory! responses! to! social!
problems!that!once!were!part! of!an!anomaly.!It!is! a!
performative!integration!that! changes!the!direction!
of!the!mainstream!network!of!policies!and!epistemic!
communities!linked!to!an!anomaly.!!
Table! 1! summarises,! the! relationship! between!
drivers!and!barriers!that!facilitate!and/or!hinder!the!
development!of! a!social! innovation!according! to!the!
innovative!cycle.!
!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(11(
!
Table'1.' Social'Innovation'Drivers'&'Barriers'by'Development'Stage'
4 SOCIAL(INNOVATION(REGIME(
As! highlighted! in! the! previous! section,! the! dif-
ferent!approaches!to! build!indicators!of!social!inno-
vation!are!focused! on!various! levels!of!analysis! and!
units! of! measurement! that! do!not! reflect! the! com-
plete! picture! of! the! context! and! dynamics! of! social!
innovation.! The! challenge! then! is! to! integrate! the!
meso! and! micro! perspectives! in! a! coherent! frame-
work!of!relationships!and!interactions.!This!is!a!dif-
ficult!and!complex! task!which!goes! beyond!the! pur-
pose! of! the! paper.! Rather! the! aim! is! to! indicate! a!
possible!path! to!explore!these!meso-micro!relation-
ships!from!an! integrated!model!of!social!innovation!
indicators.!
With!the!objective!of!offering!a!complete!picture!
of!the!interaction! between!the!meso! and!micro!lev-
els!(context!and! dynamics)!of!social! innovation,!the!
concept!of!J0K+'#).$$0!',+0$)F%6+>%!F!"EG!is!intro-
duced.! The!concept!bases!on!the! works! carried!out!
around! the! concept! of! 4%#G'&%) &%6+>%((Benjamin-
sen!&!Andrade,!2015,!Esping-Andersen,!1990).!This!
perspective! offers! an! interesting! framework! of! ex-
ploration!of!the!structural!conditions!through!which!
a!region! presents!a!set!of!vulnerabilities!which!gen-
erate!social!problems!(effective!and!potential!ones).!!
Indeed,! welfare! regimes! examine! the! advanced!
economies!relating!market!dynamics!and!social!pol-
icies.!The!thesis!of!welfare! regimes!refers!to!the!de-
gree!in!which!individuals!or!families!are!included!in!
an! acceptable! standard! of! living! regardless! of! their!
participation!in! market! relations!(Esping-Andersen,!
1990).! Welfare! regimes! are! a! theoretical! construc-
tion! (with! controversial! empirical! evidence)! that!
enables! a! comparative! analysis! between! different!
national!realities,!which!differ!in!the!different!articu-
lations! between! state,! market! and! family.! Different!
articulations! result! in! different! relationship! pat-
terns.! From! this! pioneer! work! by! Esping-Andersen!
(1990)!welfare!regimes!can!be!classified!as!follows:!
(a) The!6-H2+06!one,!which!associates!a!high!degree!
of! commodification! in! labour! relations! with! a!
residual! role! in! the! public! sector! and! families.!
Individuals! are! responsible! for! the! welfare!
from!the!moment!they!enter!the!labour!market!
and!the!solidarity!mechanism!is!the!market.!
(b) The!;*.:2+508-52!one,!which!gives!a!strong!role!
in!welfare! to!families!and!a!residual!role!to!the!
state!and!the! market.! Family!and!corporations!
play! a! central! role! as! the! articulation! core! of!
solidarity.!
(c) The!:*;-06(427*;+08-;!one,!where!welfare!is! as-
sociated! to! the! construction! of! public! institu-
tions! with! a! residual! role! for! the! market! and!
families,! where! the! solidarity! core! is! the ! State!
DEVELOPMENT STAGE DRIVERS/BARRIERS
Failue by interaction » B1: Failure of the state or the
market
Failure by inadequancy » B2: Failure of the state or the
market
Social proto-innovation
(searching innovative
solutions)
» B3/D1: Express the relation-
ship between drivers and
barriers that facilitate/
hinder modelling innovative
ideas
Explorative social
innovation (testing
innovative solutions)
» B4/D2: Express the relation-
ship between drivers and
barriers that facilitate/
hinder modelling innovative
ideas (formalise the exper-
iences in a SI pattern)
Expansive social
innovation (incremental
innovative solutions)
» B5/D3: Express the relation-
ship between drivers and
barriers that facilitate/
hinder incorporating incre-
mental improvements (ex-
pand) in a modelled social
innovation (scaling-deep).
Meta social innovation
(transformative
integration)
» B6/D4: Express the relation-
ship between drivers and
barriers that facilitate/
hinder modelling the incor-
poration of social innovation
into the mainstream (and
transforming it into a para-
digm).
Transfer social innovation
(scaling-up)
» B7/D5: Express the relation-
ship between drivers and
barriers that facilitate/
hinder the transfer of
modelled social innovation-
towards other social
contexts.
12(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
and!with!a!universal!treatment!for!all!individu-
als!in!society.!
!
This! first! classification! has! been! extended! by!
other! theoretical! and! empirical! works,! and! as! a! re-
sult!other! welfare!regimes! such!as! the!Mediterrane-
an! or! the! socialist! have! been! conceptualised!
(Moghadam!Saman!&!Kaderabkova,!2015a,!2015b).!
In! view! of!social! innovation,! welfare! regimes!
have!limitations!to!explain!the!conditions!in!which!a!
diversity! of! social! problems! that! constitute! the!
source! of! socially! innovative! solutions.! As! we! will!
see!below,!SIRs!may!be!more!appropriate!to!explain!
the! contexts! of! social! innovation! by! identifying! re-
gional!vulnerability!patterns:!social,!economic,!insti-
tutional! and! environmental! ones.! The! interaction!
between! these! types! of! vulnerability! generates! so-
cial!problems,!many!of!which!question!the!effective-
ness!of! rules!and!available!resources!of!a!particular!
institutional! context! to! resolve! these! problems!
(anomalies).!
As!has!been!pointed!out,!when!a!social!problem!
is!not!solved! in!an!acceptable! way!creating!the! nec-
essary!welfare!standards!for!a!determined!context,!it!
tends!to!become!an! anomaly.! An! '$0>'#-!is!a!per-
sistent! problem! whose! consequences! (impacts! and!
effects)!are!intolerable!(actively,!passively,!effective-
ly! or! potentially)! for! a! part! of! the! mainstream .! The!
>'+$/,&%'>!manages!relations!between!state,!soci-
ety!and! market!for!a!particular!context!according!to!
a! paradigm! (set! of! rules! and! stable! resources! diffi-
cult!to!modify!in!the!short!term).! Thus,!the!anomaly!
represents!the!mainstreams’! inability!to!give! an!ap-
propriate,!effective!and!inclusive!response!to!the!ac-
cepted!welfare!standard.!
The!concept!of!vulnerability!is!one!that!is!closely!
linked! to! the! concept! of! anomaly.! 7"#$%&'(+#+,-!al-
ways! refers! to! an! inadequate! response!to! a! poten-
tially!high-impact! problem! (either! social,! economic,!
institutional!or!environmental! one).!From! this!point!
of! view,! vulnerabilities! are! potentially! creators! of!
social!innovations.!Therefore,!it!can!be!assumed!that!
by!identifying!vulnerabilities,!anomalies!(effective!or!
potential)!are!indirectly!identified.!
Figure! 4! illustrates! the!approach! of! a! SIR.! Vul-
nerability!is!in!the!middle!of!the!approach.!7"#$%&'*
(+#+,-) '&,+K"#',%/) ,E%) >+K&0) 5-$'>+K/) H0&6'$+/'*
,+0$/I)4+,E),E%) >%/0)K0$,%2,/)H&%6+0$/IO!It! creates!
a!bridge!between!these!two!levels!of!the!institution-
al!context.!The! model! is!based!on! the! following!hy-
pothesis:!
!
HYPOTHESIS^('C5(C@HC5=(=5H@1;G2(F32;5=GV@2@<W(@D_(<C5(
H=5G<5=(<C5(E=1VGV@2@<W(<CG<(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;D(545=H5A(
!
The!hypothesis!suggests!that!in!vulnerable!insti-
tutional!contexts!the!problems!that!affect!a!diversity!
of!social! groups!are!multiplied!and!interrelated! and!
the!mainstream’s!response! capacity!to!find! satisfac-
tory!social!integration! solutions! according!to!an!ac-
cepted!standard!collapses.! In!conditions!of! vulnera-
bility,!problems!are!confused!and!connected!to!each!
other!increasing!their!complexity!(associated!diver-
sity).! This! in! turn! calls! for! systemic! solutions! for!
which! neither! necessary! capacities! nor! resources!
are! available.! Forasmuch,! a! situation! occurs!where!
for! a! systemic! problem! a! systemic! solution! is! not!
available!within!the!mainstream.!As!has!been! point-
ed!out,!the!institutional!context! responds!to!this!sit-
uation! in! different! ways! (see! social! innovation! cy-
cle).! The! innovative! response! (social! innovation)!
undergoes!several!stages!until!it!becomes!a!systemic!
response!(transformative!integration).!Indeed,!there!
are!different!innovative!solutions!to!an!anomaly!that!
are!tested.!They!are!fragmented,!partial,!local,!exper-
imental!solutions.!Only!one! or!an!integrated! system!
of! solutions! is! able! to! be! modelled! and! succeeds! in!
colonising!the!mainstream!and!giving!an!acceptable!
sustainable!answer!to!the!anomaly.!!
However,! the! degree! of! vulnerability! is! not!
equivalent! in! all! institutional! contexts.! We! find! re-
gions!that!are!more!vulnerable!than!others.!Each!in-
stitutional!context!has! different!vulnerability!condi-
tions! derived! from! their! endogenous! development.!
This!is! what!we! call!&%6+0$'#)!"#$%&'(+#+,-.!The! re-
gional! vulnerability! is! a! synthetic! concept! that! ex-
press!the!integration!of!different!types!of!vulnerabil-
ity! (social,!economic,! institutional! and!environmen-
tal)!for!a!particular!institutional!context.!The!region-
al!vulnerability!enables!the!comparison!between!dif-
ferent! institutional! contexts! (various! regions)! ob-
served!in!a!range!that!goes!from!a!greater!to!a!lesser!
degree!of!vulnerability.!
The! argument! suggests! that! vulnerability!is! re-
lated!to!the!production!of!anomalies.!Thus,!the!high-
er!the! degree!of!regional!vulnerability,!the!higher!is!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(13(
the! probability! of! a! context! developing! anomalies!
and! therefore,! the! higher! will! be! the! probability! of!
producing!social!innovations.!
P04)K'$)&%6+0$'#)!"#$%&'(+#+,+%/)(%)0(/%&!%5Q)
As!figure!4!suggests,!regional!vulnerability!should!be!
explored!according!to! four! main!vulnerabilities:!so-
cial,!economic,!institutional! and!environmental!(see!
Annex!I!for! an! exploration!of!these! vulnerabilities).!
These!distinct!types! of!vulnerability!have!particular!
effects! in! a! determined! institutional! context;! they!
create! specific! and! different! kinds! of! problems! and!
forms!of!exclusion!for! each! context.!This!is!the! rea-
son!why! social!innovations!are!contextual,!focal!and!
difficult! to! scale.! Every! institutional! context! has! a!
degree!of!regional!vulnerability! and! this!is!the!rea-
son!why!even!in!institutional! contexts! with! low!re-
gional!vulnerability!it!is!possible!to!find!some!degree!
of!social!innovation.!
In!short,!the!suggested!concept!of! regional! vul-
nerability! formed! by! four! types! vulnerability! is! an!
appropriate!concept!to!understand!the!emergence!of!
social! innovations.! Accordingly,! regional! contexts!
should!not!be!interpreted!and!classified!according!to!
the! degree! of! institutional! capacity4!of! the!main-
stream!to! sustain!social!integration!in!the!long!term!
as! suggested! by! the! model! of! the! welfare! state! re-
gimes.! On! the! contrary,! institutional! contexts! must!
be! understood! by! their! degree! of! vulnerability,! i.e.,!
by! the! level! of! institutional! inability! to! respond! to!
the! dynamics! of! inclusion/exclusion! in! the! long!
term.! The! mainstream’s! institutional! inability! cre-
ates!the!«favourable»!scenarios!for!the!emergence!of!
social!innovations.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
4!! The! institutional! capacity! of! an! institutional! context! must!
not! be! understood! as! the! capacity! of! the! public! sector! to!
meet! social! demands! by! means!of! specific! policies,! but! as!
the!capacities!and!resources!that! the!State,! the!market! and!
the!family!are!able!to!mobilise!in!order!to!sustain!a!specific!
pattern! of! social! integration! as! suggested! by!the! model! of!
the!welfare!regimes.!
!
Figure'4.' Social'Innovation'Regimes'–'Interplay'between'Context'
and'Dynamics'of'Social'Innovation'
P04)50)4%)0(/%&!%)/0K+'#)+$$0!',+0$/Q))
With!the!proposed!SIR!it!is!suggested!to!explore!
social!innovations!by!analysing!the!social!innovation!
capacities! mobilised! by! a! plurality! of! organisations!
at!the!regional!level!(micro;!see!figure!4).!In!order!to!
observe!these!social!innovation!capacities,! the!mod-
el! of! components,! objectives,! principles!and! impact!
(COPI)!is!utilised!(Rehfeld!et!al.,!2015).!
This!model!suggests! that!social!innovations!are!
integrated!by!different! levels:!the!level! of!actor!net-
works! and! relations! between! actors,! a! level! of! re-
sources! (combination! between! several! kinds! of! fi-
nancial,! organisational,! technological! capital,! etc.)!
and! an! institutional! level! (social! capital).! In! the!
model,!these!dimensions!are!integrated!into!what!is!
defined!as!the! R10>90$%$,/S!of! social!innovation.!
These! components! relate! in! different! ways! accord-
ing!to! the!RT(U%K,+!%/S!of!social!innovation.!As!has!
been!mentioned,! social!innovation!seeks!to!empow-
er!and!improve! the!inclusion!conditions! of!vulnera-
ble!groups!by!reducing!either!their!social,!economic!
institutional! and/or! environmental! vulnerability.!
These! objectives! are! developed! through! projects!
(cohesive!set!of!actions!and! resources!implemented!
in!a!specific!time!frame)!that!are!carried!out!accord-
ing!to! efficiency!(degree!of!relationship!between!re-
sources,! time! and! impact)! and! governance! levels!
(degree!of!inclusion!of!the!target!population!in!social!
innovation!activities).!These!dimensions!are!defined!
Meso Level (region)
Micro Level (organisation)
Social Innovation
Impact
Objectives
PrinciplesComponents
Regional Vulnerability
Environmental
Economic
InstitutionalSocial
Vulnerability
DYNAMICS OF SI
VULNERABILITY CONTEXT
INDICATORS
INDICATORS
SOCIAL INNOVATION REGIME
14(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
in! the! COPI! model! as! social! innovation! RL&+$K+*
9#%/S.! Finally,! the! model! suggests! th at! this! specific!
cohesion!between!components,! objectives!and! prin-
ciples! has! an! R.>9'K,S!not! only! at! a! social! level!
(empowering! effect),! but! also! at! an! organisational!
level!(learning! effect)!and!at!a!spatial!level!(scale!ef-
fect;!see!Annex!II).!
Previously,!it!has! been! argued! that!social!inno-
vation!has!four! stages!in!its! development.!Now!it! is!
further! suggested! that! for! each! stage! th ere! is! a! dif-
ferent! combination! between! components,! objec-
tives,!principles!and!impact.!Thus,!for!example,!for!a!
social! proto-innovation,! its! degree! of! networking,!
efficiency,!governance!and!impact!is!not!the!same!as!
the!one!of!a! social! innovation! in! the!exploratory!or!
expansive!stage.!This!way,!what!is!meant!by!innova-
tion! dynamics! is! the! active! relationship! between!
components,! objectives,! principles! and! impact! (CO-
PI)!and!the!stages!of!social!innovation.!
This! 4<.07-;!suggests! that! social! innovations!
mobilise!drivers!according!to!the!barriers!they!have!
to!overcome!and!that!the!pairing!driver/barrier!has!
different! characteristics! according! to! the! phase! of!
the!innovative!process.!
Social! innovation! dynamics! are! structured! in!
what! we! could! call!modes! of! social! innovation,! de-
fined!as!the! ways! in!which!social! innovations! inter-
vene!in!order! to!empower!and! integrate!vulnerable!
social!groups!into!a!welfare!standard!considered!ac-
ceptable!by!a!specific!institutional!context.!
Finally,! as! depicted! in! figure! 4! the! relationship!
between!meso!and! the!micro!level! can!be!observed!
from!a!two-way!corridor.!Vulnerabilities!connect!the!
meso!with!the!micro!level!(top-down)!and!the!micro!
with!the!meso!level!(bottom-up).!On!the!one!hand,!at!
the!meso!level!(region),!the!institutional!context!has!
a! level! of! vulnerability! that! causes!social! problems,!
some! of! which! become! anomalies.! On! the! other!
hand,!the!dynamics!of!social!innovation,!at!the!micro!
level! (organisations),! combine! components,! objec-
tives,! principles! and! impacts! and! are! structured! in!
innovative! actions! to! resolve! these ! anomalies.! That!
is,!to!find!acceptable! solutions!that!seek!to! integrate!
themselves! and! transform! the! mainstream! (trans-
formative!integration;!bottom-up).!
A! SIR!can! be! defined! as! 0( ;*7H-.08-*.( *9( 262D
72.8:( 8308( +2/-*.06( ;*.82I8:( ;0.( 42526*1( 8*( ;+2082(
:*;-06(-..*508-*.:(0:(0(+2:1*.:2(8*(832(0.*706-2:(0.4(
+2/-*.06( 5>6.2+0H-6-8-2:( *9( 832-+( 2.5-+*.72.8=!They!
can! be! explored! according! to! two! major! variables:!
First,! the! 42/+22( *9( 5>6.2+0H-6-8<!resulting! from! a!
combination!of!four!types!of!vulnerabilities,!namely!
social,! economic,! institutional! and! environmental.!
The!degree!of! vulnerability!enables! the!comparison!
of! different! regional! contexts.! Second,! the! 7*42:(*9(
:*;-06( -..*508-*.,! including! cultural,! technological,!
organisational,! legal! and! infrastructural! innovation!
(Castro-Spila!&!Unceta,!2015)!which!structure!social!
innovation! in!patterns!according!to! the!COPI!model!
(Rehfeld!et!al.,!2015).!
5 CONCLUDING(REMARKS(
Social! Innovation! lacks! a! common! conceptual!
and!methodological!framework!to!build!a!system! of!
indicators!capable!of!measuring!its! processes,!prod-
ucts!and!impact.!!
In!this!conceptual!and!methodological!effort,!the!
SIMPACT!project!offers! a! definition!and! an! analysis!
that!is!key!for! the! development! of! indicators.!Thus,!
Social!Innovation! is!understood! as!the! novel!combi-
nation!of!ideas! and! different!forms!of! collaboration!
that! transcend! the! institutionally! established! con-
texts! with! the! effect! of! empowering! and! involving!
certain!vulnerable!groups!during!the!process!or!as!a!
result! of! the! innovation.! This! definition! focuses! on!
the! actors! identified! as! vulnerable! groups! and! the!
dynamic! of! social! innovation! is! aimed! at!
(re)incorporating! these! groups! into! welfare! stand-
ards.!Vulnerability!is!not!the! result!of!a!personal!in-
adequacy,! but! rather! the! result! of! institutional! ob-
structions! that! unable! the! solution! of! the! social!
problem! increasing! regional! vulnerability.! This! is!
what!we!have!called!an!anomaly.!Given!that!margin-
alised! and!vulnerable! groups! are! very! heterogene-
ous! (there! are! different! forms! of! exclusion),! the!
forms!of!social! inclusion! are!heterogeneous!as! well.!
Therefore,!social!innovations!are!“pluralistic”!by!def-
inition.!The!analysis!of!social!innovations!shows!that!
there! are! various! paths! and! phases! which! explain!
the!social!innovation!processes!linked!to!the!resolu-
tion!of!anomalies!by!means!of!different!modes!of!so-
cial!innovation.!
The!present!paper!explores!the!concept!of!Social!
Innovation! Regime! defined! as! 832(7*42:(>:24(H<( +2D
/-*.06(;*.82I8:(8*(42526*1(:*;-06(-..*508-*.:(8308(0.D
:C2+(8*(832( 0.*706-2:( 0.4(+2/-*.06(5>6.2+0H-6-8-2:(*9(
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(15(
832-+( 2.5-+*.72.8:.! The! model! suggests! a! path! for!
the!development!of!indicators!aimed!at!mapping!so-
cial! innovation! contexts! (meso! level)! and! social! in-
novation! dynamics! (micro! level)! in! an! integrated!
model! whose! guiding! element! are! the! different!
forms!of!vulnerability.!
The!model!of!Social!Innovation!Regime!helps!us!
guide! the! development! of! social! innovation! indica-
tors! in! three! different! ways.! The! first! one! refers! to!
the! understanding! and! measurement! of! the! condi-
tions! of! the! institutional! context.! The! regional! vul-
nerability!is!made!up!of!four!kinds!of!vulnerabilities!
(social,! economic,! institutional! and! environmental)!
that!provide!a!clear!view!of!the!inabilities!of!an!insti-
tutional! context! to! resolve! social! problems! accord-
ing! to! a! welfare! standard.! This! path! enables! the!
comparison! of! regions! according! to! their! degree! of!
vulnerability,! which! is! the! proper! ground! for! the!
emergence! of! anomalies.! The! second! one! refers! to!
the!understanding!and! measurement! of!social! inno-
vation!dynamics!at! an!organisational!level!to!estab-
lish! the! social! innovation! modes! and! cycles! (pat-
terns)!according!to! a!diversity!of!innovative! agents.!
Finally,! the! third! way! is! about! understanding! the!
dynamic! of! a! Social! Innovation! Regime! (by! linking!
regional!vulnerability!with!social!innovation!dynam-
ics)!for!the!design!of!public!policies!promoting!social!
innovation.!
!
References(
Alvord,!S.!H.,!Brown,!L.!D.!&!Letts,!C.!(2003).!Social!
Entrepreneurship!and!Social!Transformation:!An!
Exploratory!Study.!'32(S*>+.06(*9(%116-24(T2305D
-*+06(!;-2.;2@!40,!260-282.!
Battilana,!J.,!Lee,!M.,!Walker,!J.!&!Dorsey,!C.!(2012).!In!
Search!of!the!Hybrid!Ideal.!!80.9*+4(!*;-06("..*D
508-*.(E25-2C@!12,!51-55.!
Benjaminsen,!L.!&!Andrade,!S.!B.!(2015).!Testing!a!
Typology!of!Homelessness!Across!Welfare!Re-
gimes:!Shelter!Use!in!Denmark!and!the!USA.!
K*>:-./(!8>4-2:@!30,!858-876.!
Cajaiba-Santana,!G.!(2014).!Social!innovation:!Mov-
ing!the!field!forward.!A!conceptual!framework.!
'2;3.*6*/-;06(Q*+2;0:8-./(0.4(!*;-06(&30./2@!82,!
42-51.!
Castro-Spila,!J.!&!Unceta,!A.!(2015).!Modes!d'innova-
tion!sociale!et!gouvernance.!In!Klein,!J.!L.!(Ed.)!U0(
8+0.:9*+708-*.(:*;-062(10+(6V-..*508-*.(:*;-062(
Quebec,!CRISES.!
Castro-Spila,!J.,!Unceta,!A.!&!García-Fronti,!J.!(2016).!
Social!Innovation!Indicators.!"..*508-*.?('32(W>D
+*120.(S*>+.06(*9(!*;-06(!;-2.;2(E2:20+;3@!forth-
comming.!
Cohen,!W.!M.,!&!Levinthal,!D.!L.!(1990).!Absorptive!
Capacity:!A!New!Perspective!on!Learning!and!In-
novation.!%47-.-:8+08-52(!;-2.;2(X>0+82+6<,!35(1,!
Special!Issue:!Technology,!Organizations!and!In-
novation),!128152.!
Ellis,!T.!(2010)!'32(Y2C($-*.22+:?(!>:80-.0H62(H>:-D
.2::(:>;;2::(83+*>/3(:*;-06(-..*508-*.(0.4(:*;-06(
2.8+21+2.2>+:3-1@(New!York,!John!Wiley!&!Sons.!
Esping-Andersen,!G.!(1990).!'32('3+22()*+64:(*9(
)2690+2(&01-806-:7@(Princeton,!Nueva!Jersey,!
Princeton!University!Press.!
European!Commission!(2010).!Social!innovation!re-
search!in!the!European!Union.!Approaches,!find-
ings!and!future!directions.!%50-H62?(
3881:?AA2;=2>+*10=2>A+2:20+;3A:*;-06D
:;-2.2:A149A1*6-;<Z+25-2C:A:*;-06Z-..*508-*.=149=!
European!Commission!(2011).!Empowering!people,!
driving!change!Social!Innovation!in!the!European!
Union.!T>+20>(*9(W>+*120.($*6-;<(%45-:2+:@!Lux-
emburg,!1-176.!
European!Commission!(2012)!Strengthening!social!
innovation!in!Europe.!Journey!to!effective!as-
sessment!and!metrics.!Belgium,!pp.!1-75.!
European!Commission!(2013).!Guide!To!Social!In-
novation.!E2/-*.06(0.4([+H0.($*6-;<(A(W716*<D
72.8@(!*;-06(%990-+:(0.4(".;6>:-*.,!Luxemburg,!1-
71.!
Goldenberg,!M.!(2010).!Reflections!on!Social!Innova-
tion.!'32($3-60.83+*1-:8@!23,!207-220.!
Grassl,!W.!(2012).!Business!models!of!social!enter-
prise:!A!design!approach!to!hybridity.!S*>+.06(*9(
!*;-06(W.8+21+2.2>+:3-1($2+:12;8-52:@!1,!37-60.!
Grohs,!S.!(2014).!Hybrid!Organizations!in!Social!Ser-
vice!Delivery!in!Quasimarkets:!The!Case!of!Ger-
many.!%72+-;0.(T2305-*+06(!;-2.8-:8@!58,!1425-
1445.!
Groot,!A.!&!Dankbaar,!B.!(2014).!Does!Social!Innova-
tion!Require!Social!Entrepreneurship?!'2;3.*6*D
/<("..*508-*.(#0.0/272.8(E25-2C,!17-26.!
Harding,!R.!(2006).!Social!entrepreneurship!moni-
tor.!Global!Entrepreneurship!Monitor.!London,!
London!Busines!School.!
John,!T.,!Geoff,!A.!&!Ann,!L.!(2000).!Social!entrepre-
neurship!–!a!new!look!at!the!people!and!the!po-
tential.!#0.0/272.8(\2;-:-*.@!38,!328-338.!
Krlev,!G.,!Bund,!E.!&!Mildenberger,!G.!(2014).!Meas-
uring!What!MattersIndicators!of!Social!Innova-
16(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
tiveness!on!the!National!Level.!".9*+708-*.(!<:D
827:(#0.0/272.8@!31,!200-224.!
Lane,!P.!J.,!Koka,!B.!R.,!&!Pathak,!S.!(2006).!The!Reifi-
cation!of!Absorptive!Capacity:!A!Critical!Review!
and!Rejuvenation!of!the!Construct.!%;0427<(*9(
#0.0/272.8(E25-2C@!31(4),!833863.!
Maclean,!M.,!Harvey,!C.!&!Gordon,!J.!(2013).!Social!
innovation,!social!entrepreneurship!and!the!
practice!of!contemporary!entrepreneurial!phi-
lanthropy.!".82+.08-*.06(!7066(T>:-.2::(S*>+.06@!
31,!747-763.!
Moghadam!Samen,!S.!&!Kaderabkova,!A.!(2015a).!
Social!Innovation!in!New!Member!States.!Part!I!–!
Theoretical!Investigation!on!Economic!Under-
pinnings.!!"#$%&'()*+,-./($012+@(2015(2),!Gel-
senkirchen:!Institute!for!Work!and!Technology.!
Moghadam!Samen,!S.!&!Kaderabkova,!A.!(2015b).!
Social!Innovation!in!New!Member!States.!Part!II!
–!Survey!of!Expert!Panel.!!"#$%&'()*+,-./($0D
12+@(2015(2),!Gelsenkirchen:!Institute!for!Work!
and!Technology.!
Mulgan,!G.!(2006).!The!process!of!social!innovation.!
"..*508-*.:?('2;3.*6*/<@(]*52+.0.;2@(]6*H06-B0D
8-*.@!1,!145-162.!
Murray,!R.,!Caulier-Grice,!J.!&!Mulgan,!G.!(2010)!'32(
^12.(T**,(*9(!*;-06("..*508-*.@(London,!NESTA.!
Oecd!(2005).!^:6*(#0.>06?(]>-426-.2:(9*+(&*662;8-./(
0.4(".82+1+28-./("..*508-*.(\080(Paris:!OECD.!
Oecd/European!Commission!(2013).!$*6-;<(T+-29(*.(
!*;-06(W.8+21+2.2>+:3-1(D(W.8+21+2.2>+-06(%;8-5-D
8-2:(-.(W>+*12@(Luxembourg:!Publications!Office!
of!the!European!Union.!
Pestoff,!V.!(2015).!Hybridity,!Coproduction,!and!
Third!Sector!Social!Services!in!Europe.!%72+-;0.(
T2305-*+06(!;-2.8-:8@!58,!1412-1424.!
Phills,!J.,!Deiglmeier,!K.!&!Dale,!T.!(2008).!Rediscov-
ering!Social!Innovation.!!80.9*+4(!*;-06("..*50D
8-*.(E25-2C@!6,!34-43.!
Rehfeld,!D.,!Terstriep,!J.!&!Alijani,!S.!(2015).!&*710+D
08-52(E21*+8(*.(!*;-06("..*508-*.(Q+072C*+,=!De-
rivable!D1.1!of!the!project!«Boosting!the!Impact!
of!Social!Innovation!in!Europe!trough!Economic!
Underpinnings»!(SIMPACT).!7th!Framework!Pro-
gramme,!Brussels:!European!Commission,!DG!
Research!and!Innovation.!
Santos,!F.,!Cotter-Salvado,!J.,!Lopo!De!Carvalho,!I.!&!
Shulte,!U.!(2013).!The!Life!Cycle!of!Social!Innova-
tions.!In!Osburg,!T.!&!Schmidpeter,!R.!(Eds.)!!*D
;-06("..*508-*.?(!>:80-.0H-6-8<@(W83-;:(0.4(]*52+.D
0.;2=!Berlin:!Springer-Verlag.!
Sen,!P.!(2007).!Ashoka's!big!idea:!Transforming!the!
world!through!social!entrepreneurship.!Q>8>+2:@!
39,!534-553.!
Sinnergiak!Social!Innovation!(2013).!E2/-*.06(!*;-06(
"..*508-*.(".42I=(%(+2/-*.06(-.42I(8*(720:>+2(:*D
;-06(-..*508-*.=@(Bilbao,!Basque!Innovation!Agen-
cy!-!Spain.!
Terstriep,!J.,!Kleverbeck,!M.,!Deserti,!A.!&!Rizzo,!F.!
(2015).!&*710+08-52(E21*+8(*.(!*;-06("..*508-*.(
0;+*::(W>+*12.!Deliverable!3.2!of!the!project!
«Boosting!the!Impact!of!Social!Innovation!in!Eu-
rope!through!Economic!Underpinnings»!(SIM-
PACT),!European!Commission,!7th!Framework!
Programme,!Brussels:!European!Commission,!DG!
Research!and!Innovation.!
Unceta,!A.,!Castro!Spila,!J.!&!Garcia-Fronti,!J.!(2016).!
Social!Innovation!Indicators.!"..*508-*.?('32(W>D
+*120.(S*>+.06(*9(!*;-06(!;-2.;2(E2:20+;3,!Nº!2!-!
Forthcoming.!
Zahra,! S.! A.,! Gedajlovic,! E.,! Neubaum,! D.! O.! &! Shul-
man,! J.! M.! (2009).! A! typology! of! social! entrepre-
neurs:! Motives,! search! processes! and! ethical! chal-
lenges.!S*>+.06(*9(T>:-.2::(_2.8>+-./.!
!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(17(
(
(
%--/`("(
Regional(Vulnerability(
(
a+5H@1;G2(X45D1(25F52Y(";>@?G<1=Db(
!
18(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
!
The!regional!vulnerability! is!a!unit! of!measure-
ment!that!includes!four!types!of!different!vulnerabil-
ities:!a)! social!vulnerability,!b)!institutional!vulnera-
bility,!c)!economic!vulnerability!and!d)!environmen-
tal! vulnerability.! For! each! of! these! dimensions! of!
vulnerability!a!set!of!specific! indicators!are!suggest-
ed! in! order! to! operationalise! the! different! types! of!
vulnerabilities.!
!
1.(SOCIAL(VULNERABILITY(
Social!vulnerability!is!related!to!the!socially!vul-
nerable!groups,!whose!identification!is!due!to!differ-
ent!criteria:!a!given!contextual! factor!that!increases!
their!chances!to!face!adverse!circumstances!for!their!
social!inclusion! and!personal!development;! the!per-
formance! of! behaviours,! which! ent ail! greater! expo-
sure!to!harmful! events,! or!the!presence! of! a!shared!
basic!feature!(age,!sex,!ethnic!background),!which!is!
supposed! to! give! them! common! risks! or! problems!
(Cannon!et!al,!2003;!Birkmann,!2006).!
From! a! regional! perspective,! some! possible! in-
dicators! to! identify! the! social! vulnerability! may! be!
the!following:!
D0,'#) %29%$5+,"&%) 0$) E%'#,E) HV) 0G) ,E%) 8:LI:!
the! total! expenditure! on! health! is! the! sum! of!
public!and! private!expenditure!on!health.!It!co-
vers!the!provision!of!health!services!(preventive!
and! curative),! family! planning! activities,! nutri-
tion! activities! and! emergency! assistance! desig-
nated! for! health,! but! it! does! not! include! water!
supply!and!sanitation!services.!
D0,'#) 9"(#+K) %29%$5+,"&%) 0$) %5"K',+0$!HV) 0G)
,E%)8:LI:! the! public! expenditure! on! e ducation!
as! a! percentage! of! the! GDP! includes! the! total!
public!expenditure! (current!and!capital)!on!ed-
ucation!expressed!as!a!percentage!of!the!GDP!in!
a!given!year.! The!public! spending!on!education!
includes! Government! spending! on! educational!
institutions! (public! and! private),! e ducation! ad-
ministration!and! subsidies!or! transfers!for!pri-
vate! entities! (students/households! and! other!
private!entities).!
D0,'#)!"#$%&'(#%)%>9#0->%$,)HV)0G),0,'#)%>*
9#0->%$,I@!vulnerable! employment! refers! to!
unpaid! family! workers! and! self-employed!
workers! as! a! percentage! of! the! total! employ-
ment.!
!
2.(INSTITUTIONAL(VULNERABILITY(
Institutional! vulnerability! is! understood! as! the!
inability! to! properly! communicate! and! coordinate!
different!institutional!levels,!what!expresses!institu-
tional!rigidity!and!also!its!low!capacity!to!respond!to!
risk!situations!(Porfiriev,!2007).!The!greater!or!less-
er! capacity! to! respond! appropriately! to! risk! situa-
tions!would!be!linked!to!a!greater!or!lesser!degree!of!
institutional! vulnerability! and! to! the! capacity! of! in-
stitutional!governance.!
70+K%) '$5) 'KK0"$,'(+#+,-@!it! measures! the! ca-
pacity! of! a! country’s! citizens! to! participate! in!
the!selection!of!their!government,!as!well!as!the!
freedom! of! expression,! freedom! of! association!
and!free!media.!
80!%&$>%$,'#) %GG%K,+!%$%//@!it! measures! the!
quality!of!public!services,!bureaucracy,!the!qual-
ity!of!the!public!administration!as!well!as!its!de-
gree! of! independence! from! political! pressures,!
the!quality!of!policy!formulation!and!implemen-
tation,! and! the! credibility! of! the! government’s!
commitment!to!those!policies.!
F%6"#',0&-) W"'#+,-@!it! measures! the! govern-
ment’s!capacity!to!design!and!implement!sound!
policies! and! regulations! that! permit! and! pro-
mote!the!development!of!the!private!sector.!
F"#%) 0G) #'4:! it!measures! the! extent! to! which!
agents!have!confidence!in!and!abide!by!the!rules!
of! society,! in! particular,! the! quality! of! contract!
enforcement,!police!and!courts.!
10$,&0#)0G)K0&&"9,+0$:!it!measures!the!extent!to!
which! public! power! is! exercised! for! private!
gain,! including! both! small! and! large! forms! of!
corruption!as!well!as!the!control!of!the!State!by!
elites!and!private!interests.!
!
3.(ECONOMIC(VULNERABILITY(
The!economic!vulnerability!refers!to!the!institu-
tions’! inability! to! manage! a! financial/economic! cri-
sis.!This!is!the!inability!to!return!to!the!starting!point!
prior! to! the! risk! situation! or! crisis! (Mechler! et! al,!
2004).! More! specifically,! the! greater! the! financial!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(19(
institutions!and!organisms’! capacity!to! evaluate!and!
react!to! economic!losses! caused!by! a!socioeconomic!
or!financial!crisis,!the!lower! is!the!economic!vulner-
ability.! Both! the! strength! and! adaptive! capacity! of!
the!economic!system!are!decisive!in!this!process.!
8:L) 9%&) K'9+,'! (HXJY) +$) K"&&%$,) 9&+K%/I@) The!
GDP! per! capita! is! the! gross! domestic! product!
divided!by!the!population!mid-year.!The!GDP!is!
the!sum!of!the! gross!value!added!of!all!resident!
producers! in! the! economy! plus! all! taxes! on!
products,!minus!all!subsidies!not!included!in!the!
value!of!products.!It!is!calculated!without! doing!
depreciation!deductions!of!manufactured!goods!
or! for! depletion! and! degradation! of! natural! re-
sources.!Data!in!US$!in!current!prices.!
M29%$5+,"&%)0$)&%/%'&KE)'$5)5%!%#09>%$,)HV)
0G) ,E%) 8:LI@!expenditure! on! research! and! de-
velopment! is! current! and! capital! expenditure!
(public! and! private)! on! creative! work! carried!
out! systematically! in! order! to! increase!
knowledge,!even!knowledge!on!humankind,!cul-
ture! and! society! and! the! use! of! knowledge! to!
create! new! applications.! The! research! and! de-
velopment! area! comprises! basic! research,! ap-
plied!research!and!experimental!development.!!
10$/">%&) 9&+K%) +$G#',+0$) H'$$"'#) VI@!the! in-
flation! measured! by! the! consumer! price! infla-
tion! reflects! the! annual! percentage! change! in!
the!cost!for!the!average!consumer!of!acquiring!a!
basket!of!goods! and!services!which! can!be!at! a!
fixed! or! variable! rate! at! determined! intervals,!
for!example,!annually.!In!general,!the!Laspeyres!
formula!is!used.!
!
4.(ENVIRONMENTAL(VULNERABILITY(
Environmental!vulnerability!refers!to! the!extent!
to! which! natural! and! environmental! resources! are!
susceptible! to! being! damaged,! degraded! or! de-
stroyed! by!their!exposure!to!a! hostile! agent! or!fac-
tor.!This!factor!is!often! uncontrollable! (natural! dis-
asters)!or! may! be!related! to!the!mismanagement! of!
natural!resources!or!of!the!pertinent!environmental!
sustainability! policies.! The! mismanagement! thereof!
provokes!a! greater!or!lesser!degree!of! environmen-
tal! vulnerability! that! together! with! the! natural! un-
predictability! determines! to! a! greater! or! lesser! ex-
tent! the! risk! of! environmental! disaster,! affecting! at!
the! same! time! populations! and! ecosystems! of! the!
places!where!these!disasters!happen.!
10$/">9,+0$)0G)%#%K,&+K)%$%&6-)HZ[E)9%&)K'9*
+,'I@!the! consumption! of! electric! energy!
measures!the!production!of!power!stations!and!
cogeneration! plants! minus! the! losses! occurred!
during!the!transmission,!distribution!and!trans-
formation! and! the! own! consum ption! of! the! co-
generation!plants.!!
1TA) %>+//+0$/) HZ,I@!carbon! dioxide! emissions!
come!from!the!burning! of! fossil! fuels!and!from!
the!production!of!cement.! They!include! the!car-
bon! dioxide! produced! during! the! consumption!
of!solid,!liquid,!gaseous!fuels!and!gas!flaring.!
D0,'#)'$$"'#)%2,&'K,+0$)0G)G&%/E4',%&)H+$),&+#*
#+0$) K"(+K) >%,&%/I@!the! annual! extraction! of!
freshwater! refers! to! the! total! extraction ! of! wa-
ter! without! counting! the! evaporation! losses! in!
storage!basins.!The! extraction!also!includes!the!
water! from! desalination! plants! in! countries!
where!these!are!an!important!source.!
F%$%4'(#%) G"%#/) '$5) 4'/,%/) HV) 0G) ,E%) ,0,'#)
%$%&6-I@!renewable!fuels!and!wastes!form!solid!
and! liquid! biomass,! biogas! and! industrial! and!
municipal! waste,! measured! as! a! percentage! of!
the!total!consumption!of!energy.!
20(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
(
(
%--/`(""(
Dynamics(of(Social(Innovation(
(
a*=HG;@DG<@1;G2(X4@?=1(25F52Y(";>@?G<1=Db(
!
!
!*&"%7("--*0%'"*-(+/."#/(|(21(
In!this!section,!a!scheme!for!the!development!of!social!innovation!indicators!at!micro!level!is!provided.!For!
this!development,!the!COPI!model!(Rehfeld!et!al.,!2015)!is!operationalised,!which!enables!the!exploration!of!so-
cial!innovation!dynamics!at!organisational!level:!
'
Dimensions'
Factors'
Definition'
Indicator'
1.(COMPONENTS(
:A:A(%?<1=D(
%?<1=D(=5\5=(<1(<C5(>5H=55(1\(
>@F5=D@<W(1\(<C5(=52G<@1;G2(?GEU
@<G2(1=HG;@DG<@1;D(CGF5(OC5;(
<C5W(>5F521E(D1?@G2(@;;1FGU
<@1;(G?<@F@<@5DA(
:A:A:A(&11E5=G<@1;(EG=<;5=Dc(>5H=55(1\(>@F5=D@<W(
X1=HG;@DG<@1;G2(E=1T@4@<W(<1(>5F521E(D1?@G2(@;;1U
FG<@1;DA((
:A:ABA(&11E5=G<@1;(EG=<;5=Dc(>5H=55(1\(H51U
H=GEC@?G2(>@F5=D@<W(XH51H=GEC@?G2(E=1T@4@<WY(<1(
>5F521E(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;DA((
:ABA(+5D13=?5D(
+5D13=?5D(=5\5=(<1(<C5(25F52(1\(
C34G;_(<5?C;121H@?G2(G;>(
1=HG;@DG<@1;G2(?GE@<G2(1=HG;@U
DG<@1;D(CGF5(OC5;(<C5W(>5U
F521E(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;(G?<@F@U
<@5DA(
:ABA:A([5H=55(1\(>@F5=D@<W(@;(<C5(\1=4G<@1;(1\(
C34G;(?GE@<G2(@;(<C5(1=HG;@DG<@1;(XC34G;(?GE@U
<G2Y(<1(>5F521E(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;DA(
:ABABA([5H=55(1\(>@F5=D@<W(@;(<C5(<WE5D(1\(<5?CU
;121H@5D(GFG@2GV25(@;(<C5(1=HG;@DG<@1;(X<5?C;1U
21H@?G2(?GE@<G2Y(<1(?G==W(13<(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;DA(
:ABAIA([5H=55(1\(>@F5=D@<W(1\(<C5(25G=;@;H(G?<@F@U
<@5D(G;>(@;<5=;G2(<=G;D\5=(1\(<C5(1=HG;@DG<@1;(
X>5H=55(1\(1=HG;@DG<@1;G2(?GE@<G2Y(<1(>5F521E(
D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;DA(
:AIA(";D<@<3<@1;D(
";D<@<3<@1;D(=5\5=(<1(<C5(25F52(
1\(D1?@G2(?GE@<G2(X=325D_(FG235D(
G;>(D1?@G2(G;>(@;D<@<3<@1;G2(
?1;\@>5;?5Y(1=HG;@DG<@1;D(
CGF5(OC5;(<C5W(>5F521E(D1U
?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;(G?<@F@<@5DA(
:AIA:A([5H=55(1\(>@F5=D@<W(@;(<C5(<5?C;@?G2UD1?@G2(
?1;\@>5;?5(<1OG=>D(1<C5=(?11E5=G<@1;(EG=<;5=D(
XD1?@G2(?GE@<G2Y(\1=(<C5(>5F521E45;<(1\(D1?@G2(
@;;1FG<@1;DA(
2.(OBJECTIVES(
BA:A(/?1;14@?(
/?1;14@?(1Vd5?<@F5D(=5\5=(<1(
<C5(5?1;14@?(@;?23D@1;(1\(
F32;5=GV25(H=13EDA(
BABA:A([5H=55(1\(?1F5=GH5(@;(<C5(1Vd5?<@F5(1\(
@;?23D@1;(G;>(5?1;14@?(54E1O5=45;<(1\(<C5(
<G=H5<(E1E32G<@1;(X=5>3?<@1;(1\(<C5(5?1;14@?(
F32;5=GV@2@<WYA(
BABA(!1?@G2(
!1?@G2(1Vd5?<@F5D(=5\5=(<1(<C5(
D1?@G2(@;?23D@1;(1\(F32;5=GV25(
H=13EDA(
BABA:A([5H=55(1\(?1F5=GH5(@;(<C5(1Vd5?<@F5(1\(
@;?23D@1;(G;>(D1?@G2(54E1O5=45;<(1\(<C5(<G=H5<(
E1E32G<@1;(X=5>3?<@1;(1\(<C5(D1?@G2(F32;5=GV@2U
@<WYA(
BAIA(";D<@<3<@1;G2(
";D<@<3<@1;G2(1Vd5?<@F5D(=5\5=(
<1(<C5(E12@<@?G2(@;?23D@1;(1\(
F32;5=GV25(H=13EDA(
BAIA:A([5H=55(1\(?1F5=GH5(@;(<C5(1Vd5?<@F5(1\(
@;?23D@1;(G;>(E12@<@?G2(54E1O5=45;<(1\(<C5(D1U
?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;cD(<G=H5<(E1E32G<@1;(X=5>3?<@1;(1\(
<C5(@;D<@<3<@1;G2(F32;5=GV@2@<WYA(
BAKA(/;F@=1;U
45;<G2(
/;F@=1;45;<G2(1Vd5?<@F5D(=5U
\5=(<1(<C5(>5H=55(1\(5;F@=1;U
45;<G2(@;?23D@1;(1\(F32;5=GU
V25(H=13EDA(
BAKA:([5H=55(1\(?1F5=GH5(@;(<C5(1Vd5?<@F5(1\(@;U
?23D@1;(G;>(5;F@=1;45;<G2(54E1O5=45;<(1\(<C5(
<G=H5<(E1E32G<@1;(X=5>3?<@1;(1\(<C5(5;F@=1;45;U
<G2(F32;5=GV@2@<WYA(
3.(PRINCIPLES(
IA:A(/\\@?@5;?W(
/\\@?@5;?W(=5\5=D(<1(<C5(?GEG?U
@<W(<1(455<(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;(
IAIA:A([5H=55(1\(5\\@?@5;?W(G?C@5F5>(@;(<C5(@4U
E2545;<G<@1;(1\(<C5(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;A(
22(|(JAVIER'CASTRO'SPILA,'ÁLVARO'LUNA'&'ALFONSO'((
Dimensions'
Factors'
Definition'
Indicator'
1Vd5?<@F5D(VW(4GT@4@e@;H(=5U
D13=?5D(G;>(4@;@4@e@;H(?1D<DA((
IABA(.1F5=;G;?5(
.1F5=;G;?5(=5\5=D(<1(<C5(>5U
H=55(1\(@;?23D@1;(1\(F32;5=GU
V25(H=13ED(X<G=H5<(E1E32G<@1;Y(
@;(<C5(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;(E=1U
?5DD(@<D52\A(
IABA:([@F5=D@<W(1\(<C5(45?CG;@D4D(1\(@;?23D@1;(1\(
<C5(<G=H5<(E1E32G<@1;(@;(<C5(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;(
G?<@F@<@5DA((
4.(IMPACT(
KA:A(*=HG;@DGU
<@1;G2(
*=HG;@DG<@1;G2(@4EG?<(=5\5=D(
<1(<C5(@4E=1F545;<D(
G?C@5F5>(@;(<C5(1=HG;@DG<@1;(
\1=(>5F521E@;H(D1?@G2(@;;1FGU
<@1;(G?<@F@<@5DA(
KA:A:A([@F5=D@<W(1\(1=HG;@DG<@1;G2(25G=;@;H(G?U
f3@=5>(\1=(CGF@;H(>5F521E5>(G(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;A(
KABA(+5H@1;G2(
+5H@1;G2(@4EG?<(=5\5=D(<1(<C5(
>5H=55(1\(H51H=GEC@?G2(D?G2U
@;H(1\(D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;A(
KABA:([@F5=D@<W(1\(H51H=GEC@?G2(G=5GD(@;(OC@?C(
D1?@G2(@;;1FG<@1;(CGD(V55;(D?G25>A(
'
!
... The process of reforming society in the direction of a more participative arena where empowerment and learning are sources and outcomes of well-being (European Commission, 2011: 36-38;Bonifacio, 2014:153-154). Some researchers (Spila et al., 2016) state that despite strong demand from policy-making institutions, the development of proper indicators for measuring social innovation is still a pending task . Probably this is due to a still no wide consensus on its definition, its determining factors, the most appropriate methodologies and the metrics required for this purpose . ...
... However, innovative responses may fail due to the context s resistance (social, institutional, economic, cultural resistance, etc.) in any of the phases of a social innovation. This way, three kinds of failures in the response (resolution) to an anomaly can be identified (Spila et al., 2016). This process should enable several levels and typologies of social innovation -Proto, Explorative, Expansive, Meta and Scaling-up, until the Mainstream 2 , where the phenomenon is completely integrated in the society, into the legislation and business mindset with a performative integration that changes the direction of the mainstream network of policies and epistemic communities linked to an anomaly . ...
... Lifecycle of Social InnovationSource:Spila et al, 2016 ...
Article
Full-text available
The connection between social innovation and education crosses the domain of technology in a wide and composite field. The development of new digital tools for content creation - including the no-code authoring tools - and the capability to create low-cost and highly replicable learning environments has been generating the birth of social and innovative enterprises, providing non-formal education, complementary to the public education system.
... The process of reforming society in the direction of a more participative arena where empowerment and learning are sources and outcomes of well-being (European Commission, 2011: 36-38;Bonifacio, 2014:153-154). Some researchers (Spila et al., 2016) state that despite strong demand from policy-making institutions, the development of proper indicators for measuring social innovation "is still a pending task". Probably this is due to a still "no wide consensus on its definition, its determining factors, the most appropriate methodologies and the metrics required for this purpose". ...
... However, innovative responses may fail due to the context's resistance (social, institutional, economic, cultural resistance, etc.) in any of the phases of a social innovation. This way, three kinds of failures in the response (resolution) to an anomaly can be identified" (Spila et al., 2016). ...
... Source: Spila et al, 2016 This process should enable several levels and typologies of social innovation -Proto, Explorative, Expansive, Meta and Scaling-up, until the 'Mainstream 2', where the phenomenon is completely integrated in the society, into the legislation and business mindset with a 'performative integration' that "changes the direction of the mainstream network of policies and epistemic communities linked to an anomaly". The figure 3 is related to the possible and diverse combinations of barriers, drivers, and stage of social innovation. ...
Article
Full-text available
The connection between social innovation and education crosses the domain of technology in a wide and composite field. The development of new digital tools for content creation - including the no-code authoring tools - and the capability to create low-cost and highly replicable learning environments has been generating the birth of social and innovative enterprises, providing non-formal education, complementary to the public education system.
... According to Spila et al. (2016), SI should be understood as a cyclical process with different approaches and various levels of analysis and units of measurement. Therefore, they suggest a set of questions to be considered when developing indicators/metrics to measure the impact of SI initiatives/ projects (see Figure 2). ...
... Developing indicators and metrics for social innovation Source: Adapted from Spila et al. (2016). According to the reasoning shown in Figure 2, the definition of indicators and metrics has to be guided by at least four basic questions: ...
... A key result is related to the need for a better understanding of SI. To overcome the challenge of the lack of agreement on what SI entails, the current literature suggests some initiatives focusing on approaches to better understanding SI and its application in the different levels of analysis (see, for example, Domanski et al., 2014;Spila et al., 2016). Such initiatives should support researchers and policymakers in dealing with the disruptions to the progress of initiatives in the field of SI caused by the lack of consensus about what SI entails. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose How to evaluate the social impact of social innovation has emerged as an important question posed by academics, organizations, and policymakers in recent years. One reason for this is the increasing concern with the social impact of different types of organizations and social practices, particularly in response to a recognition of the urgency of developing more inclusive economies and societies. To find an answer to this question, this research seeks to investigate the state-of-the-art in terms of social innovation impact measurement, drawing on both scientific literature and practitioner literature. Originality/value This research discusses the challenges posed by measuring the impact of social innovation initiatives and how these measurements may change the assessment process. The analysis finds that methodologies for measuring social innovation have mainly been undertaken in Europe, where these initiatives are largely addressed. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopted a qualitative research approach based on the scoping review method. This method is widely used to identify emergent topics in scientific literature, aiming to identify implications for research and decision-making. The research was developed based on different steps to obtain information about the social impact measurement indicators and their overall contribution to the advancement of social innovation. Findings The results also confirmed the lack of social innovation frameworks, methodologies, and tools capable of measuring the social impact of social innovations. Furthermore, a set of barriers in this field was identified, which can be used to channel better upcoming academic research on developing social impact indicators for social innovation. KEYWORDS: social innovation; social impact; indicators; measurement practices; challenges
... La innovación social puede entenderse como un proceso social, tanto en cuanto a sus fines como a sus medios, para diseñar, implementar, evaluar y escalar nuevos o mejorados productos, servicios, prácticas y/o metodologías que facilitan la inclusión social, el empoderamiento y la mejora de la calidad de vida de grupos sociales vulnerables, a través de la cooperación entre el sector público, organizaciones del tercer sector, entidades privadas y la participación de la sociedad civil (BEPA 2010, Ionescu y Marga 2015, Castro-Spila et al. 2016, Bragaglia 2020, Pel et al. 2020. ...
... Desde este punto de vista local, la relación entre problemas y soluciones puede interpretarse como relaciones de "vulnerabilidad regional", entendidas como las capacidades regionales (institucionales, sociales, económicas, culturales) para afrontar un problema social enquistado. De esta manera, la innovación social se refiere a las capacidades para impulsar una solución y remite a la noción de "resiliencia" regional, es decir, las capacidades que poseen las instituciones, organizaciones y comunidades para enfrentar las consecuencias de un problema social sin modificar radicalmente su condición de existencia (Westley et al. 2012, van der Have y Rubalcaba 2016, Castro-Spila et al. 2016, Domanski et al. 2020). ...
... Los problemas locales son explorados en términos de vulnerabilidades regionales (sociales, tecnológicas, institucionales, económicas y culturales). La vulnerabilidad se refiere a la relación entre el grado de exposición de un grupo de personas /territorio a una variedad de amenazas (económicas, sociales, institucionales, medioambientales) y la capacidad local para afrontar estas amenazas (Cutter et al. 2003, Smit y Wandel 2006, Castro-Spila et al. 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
En un contexto de transiciones demográfica, digital y ecológica el impulso de la participación ciudadana en el diseño de políticas públicas es cada vez más demandado y relevante. El presente artículo presenta el Modelo GIZARTE LAB (Laboratorio de Innovación Social) focalizado en el impulso de competencias de transición, entendidas como el incremento de habilidades personales cuando están integradas en el desarrollo de capacidades colectivas para impulsar innovaciones sociales incrementales y acumulativas orientadas a resolver problemas locales en el largo plazo. Para el desarrollo de estas competencias, GIZARTE LAB conecta la ciudadanía (conocimiento experiencial) con las personas técnicas/gestoras de políticas públicas (conocimiento técnico-institucional) a nivel municipal (local) en el marco de comunidades de transición. La metodología del Laboratorio se basa en cuatro momentos: a) Mapa de vida (competencias emocionales), b) Diseño de Futuros (competencias anticipatorias), c) Diseño de Experiencias Piloto (competencias innovadoras), d) Desarrollo de comunidades de transición (competencias relacionales). Desde el año 2019 GIZARTE LAB se ha implementado en 9 municipios y han participado 225 personas. El artículo ofrece conclusiones, discusión (limitaciones) y lecciones aprendidas. In a context of demographic, digital and ecological transitions, the promotion of citizen participation in the design of public policies is increasingly in demand and relevant. This article presents the GIZARTE LAB Model (Social Innovation Laboratory) focused on the promotion of Transition skills, understood as the increase of personal skills integrated into collective capacities to promote incremental and cumulative social innovations to produce long term solutions. For the development of these competencies, GIZARTE LAB connects citizens (experiential knowledge) with technical people/managers of public policies (technical-institutional knowledge) at the municipal level (local) within the framework of Transitional communities. The Laboratory's methodology is based on four moments: a) Life Map (emotional competencies), b) Design of Futures (anticipatory competencies), c) Design of Pilot Experiences (innovative competencies), d) Development of transitional communities (relational competencies). Since 2019, GIZARTE LAB has been implemented in 12 municipalities and 290 people have participated. The article offers discussion and conclusions, pointing out both the limitations of the model and the lessons learned.
... The multi-pillar structure of the index is based on a study by the Economist Intelligence Unit (2016), which ranked countries along four dimensions (institutional framework and policy; finance; entrepreneurial activity; society). In Castro Spila et al. (2016), the social innovation environment is measured by a regional vulnerability index, which is created by aggregating the social, institutional, economic and environmental vulnerability components. Based on the above, after reviewing the specific characteristics of the Hungarian regions, I decided to apply the following components (Table 1). ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
As territorial disparities increase, there has been a growing need to measure inequalities. Differences among countries and regions can appear in several forms, and based on various indicators (economic development, wages, life quality, fulfilment of basic needs). Nowadays, increasingly intense globalisation and the resulting changes are also challenging countries and regions in Europe. The Eastern European region has shown a steady convergence with the rest of the EU in terms of GDP per capita since 2001. Although in the given countries the state of inequalities is critical. Researchers agree that in peripheral regions, due to the lack of traditional technological innovation; social innovation, mainly based on bottom-up initiatives, can be seen as a breakthrough point for future regional development. The aim of the article is besides defining social innovation to show its importance in the catch-up of the peripheries by the example of the Hungarian regions compared to technological innovation potential. Measuring the social innovation readiness of given regions, may depend on many factors and the Hungarian regions are showing quite different tendencies in adapting this practices.
... There were several attempts created to find its' major characteristics, and as a result of these several approaches were formed, but there is no agreed-on definition among the researchers also nowadays. Some definitions are more operational and other rather theoretical or general (Castro Spila et al. 2016). There are some common points in the definitions which can be mentioned, like the improving the wellbeing of the society, fulfil social needs, bottom-up initiatives, or the novel character of innovation to meet needs of the society which cannot be done by the market. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
As territorial disparities increase, there has been a growing need to measure inequalities. Differences among countries and regions can appear in several forms, and based on various indicators (economic development, wages, life quality, fulfilment of basic needs). The state of inequalities is especially important in peripheral regions, where socio-economic conditions are lagging of the core regions. The problems of peripheral regions cannot be solved by classical technological innovations due to low innovation potential (absorption capacity). Therefore, new or novel solutions are needed that provide creative answers to these problems, usually with bottom-up viewpoint. This answer could be social innovation. It is a new idea, which meets an until now unmet social need. The aim of the article is besides defining social innovation to show its importance in the catch-up of the peripheries by the example of a Hungarian county. The paper shows why some indicators cannot be involved easily in the analysis of social innovation in the regional level (self-employed, social enterprises, NGOs), measuring the social innovation readiness of given regions, and what can be criteria for a sustainable social innovation network in the literature, which is also applicable for the Hungarian practice.
... Social innovations play a crucial role in addressing the needs of environmentally vulnerable groups (Paille & Boiral, 2013). Environmental vulnerability refers to the susceptibility of natural and environmental resources to degradation or destruction due to various factors, such as mismanagement of natural resources, poor environmental policies, and climate change (Schartinger et al., 2017;Castro Spila et al., 2016). To address these challenges, commercial enterprises, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), are increasingly taking on the responsibility of managing scarce natural resources and designing pro-environmental policies (Holt, 2012;He et al., 2014). ...
... Items used to measure the capacity of innovation included both qualitative and quantitative data on the political and institutional environment, financing, entrepreneurships and society. Castro Spila et al. (2016) suggest measuring social innovation by determining the regional vulnerability rate in social, economic, institutional and environmental terms. This model has not been tested in research yet. ...
Article
The study introduces a methodological tool for measuring local social innovation potential and its application in five settlements in the Abaúj region of northeastern Hungary. When working on the local innovation potential (LIP) index we present in this study, we drew upon existing theories and models of social innovation. The complexity of LIP index comes from the fact that it builds upon both qualitative and quantitative data and research methods. Therefore it is simultaneously based on social scientific methods that are traditionally considered “soft” and “hard”. The LIP index is can take into account local specificities and characteristics into account and is thus suitable for presenting a fine-tuned description of the current situation and characteristics of a settlement, together with its future potential and directions for development.
Technical Report
Full-text available
BuiCaSuS was a transnational project meant to strengthen competences for social innovation. One of its work-packages aimed to map the social innovation landscape in the four participating countries: France, Latvia, Spain, and Sweden. The first phase was to generate a common understanding of key terms and propose a shared methodology as an analytical grid for the mapping that will be undertaken in each country, respectively.This working document is to provide an initial discussion about key terms as well as to delimit the inquiry question and the scope of the mapping. It then proposes the approach that shall orient the national exercises. It provides an operational guidance as task description for a desk review ("scoping") and the development of a method and tools for identifying, registering, and categorizing SI actors and action ("mapping").
Article
Full-text available
This article analyzes hybridity in third sector organizations (TSOs) in relation to the coproduction of public services. It begins by discussing hybridity in terms of the overlap between the third sector and other social institutions like the state, market, and community, illustrated by the welfare triangle. Then, it briefly introduces three different public administration regimes. It argues that changing from one area of overlap to another may place TSOs in an unfamiliar, or even alien, environment, resulting in increased hybridity and complexity. After it turns to coproduction and notes, it can refer to a variety of phenomena at various levels that contribute to the growing hybridity and complexity for TSOs and their leaders. It concludes that TSOs can orient themselves toward one of two main kinds of hybridity. A number of hypotheses are presented and some preliminary conclusions about the importance of coproduction for the governance of hybrid organizations are reached at the end of the article.
Article
Full-text available
This article compares patterns of homeless shelter use in Denmark and the USA. Combining data from homeless shelters in Denmark with population registers, we find that the prevalence of shelter use is substantially lower in Denmark than in the USA. A cluster analysis of shelter stays identifies three types of users similar to findings from US research: the transitionally, episodically and chronically homeless. However, the transitionally homeless in Denmark have a higher tendency of suffering from mental illness and substance abuse than the transitionally homeless in the USA. The results support Stephens and Fitzpatrick’ hypothesis that countries with more extensive welfare systems and lower levels of poverty have lower levels of homelessness, mainly amongst those with complex support needs, whereas in countries with less extensive welfare systems homelessness affects broader groups and is more widely associated with poverty and housing affordability problems.
Article
Full-text available
Social innovation is now considered an important element in the search for solutions to pressing social problems. Inspired by Schumpeter’s conceptualization of innovation, "social" entrepreneurship is thought to contribute to "social" innovation in more or less the same way that "normal" entrepreneurship consists of the introduction of "normal" innovations. In the literature as well as in practice, the definition of concepts such as social innovation and social entrepreneurship has led to considerable confusion. We aim to bring clarity to the debate, arguing that every entrepreneurial action results in some measure of intended or unintended social innovation, regardless of whether the entrepreneurs in question are considered or consider themselves "social" or not. We test our insights in an investigation of 20 social enterprises that have a commercial business model.
Article
Full-text available
The economic crisis has accentuated the social and economic dislocation experienced by disadvantaged communities at a time of unprecedented political and public interest in philanthropy. This has concentrated attention on the contribution that philanthropists might make in addressing socio-economic challenges, and on the role that social innovation might play in regenerating communities. This paper adds to the literature on social innovation and social entrepreneurship which aims to integrate theory and empirical practice. By examining social innovation through the lens of a case study of the Community Foundation for Tyne & Wear and Northumberland, the paper sheds light on how the sites and spaces of socially innovative philanthropic projects may have a bearing on their success. The paper highlights the importance of community engagement on the part of social innovators, and the power of self-organization in re-embedding communities. It suggests that storytelling by committed philanthropists may serve as a powerful proselytizing tool for recruiting new donors.
Article
This article provides the results of the Regional Social Innovation Index (RESINDEX), a conceptual and empirical model that explores indicators of social innovation at organizational and regional level. The RESINDEX model links absorptive capacity of knowledge and social innovation in four types of key regional agents: profit and non-profit organizations, universities, and technological centres. The pilot application of the RESINDEX model held in the Basque Country (Spain) during the year 2013. Within the framework of this study 282 regional organizations were surveyed. The article contributes to the conceptual and empirical discussion on indicators in social innovation.
Article
With the introduction of quasimarket principles in the mid-1990s, the German social service sector faced several challenges from above (the state), within (the organizations), and outside (new competitors and “players”). Within the social services, considerable differences prevail between subsectors; although all reforms have been oriented at the principle of (quasi)markets, the governance arrangements implemented have been rather divergent across subfields. This article compares the effects of the introduction of quasimarket principles in two subfields with very different governance architectures: youth welfare and old-age care. Basic findings include different degrees and variants of hybridity at the meso-level of local welfare arrangements as well as at the micro-level of the organizations in the field. The analysis shows a considerable effect of different governance regimes on the openness of the subfields to new competitors (profit-oriented and voluntary), the reactions of established third sector organizations (internal reforms and hybridization), and the modes of political steering (with varying degrees of informality and oversight).
Article
It is a privilege to introduce to you the Delta Economics report on ‘Social Entrepreneurship in the UK’. The report is an insightful analysis of five years of ground breaking research into Social Entrepreneurship. I am particularly pleased that this valuable work is being launched at the Coalition’s first Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) conference, given that the report shows that social entrepreneurial start ups are significantly more common in BAME communities than in non-BAME communities. It also shows that social entrepreneurial activity approaches, and in some places, exceeds parity between men and women. In both cases this is in marked contrast to mainstream entrepreneurial activity. The finding that social enterprise owner-managers are more common in areas of high Index of Multiple Deprivation contrasts interestingly with that in the NCVO Almanac that found general charities to be most common in the wealthiest neighbourhoods. As Dr. Harding says: “Not only has the literature on the subject expanded, but also the awareness in policy circles in the UK has grown that social enterprise may hold the key, not only to pubic service reform but also to regeneration and economic growth as well as a potential solution to some of the world’s greatest environmental and social challenges.” The Coalition has been working to raise this awareness and recognises the importance of developing the evidence base to show what social enterprise can do and to help make these solutions happen. Delta’s report outlines reasons for optimism, including the fact that 11.9% of those engaged in early stage entrepreneurial activity are trying to start a social venture. The Coalition is committed to building the evidence base on and for social enterprises, by our own work (such as the forthcoming State of Social Enterprise survey of social enterprises affiliated to the Coalition), and by working with others including the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the forthcoming Third Sector Research Centre and independent researchers like Delta Economics. Delta’s report highlights the need for: Clarity on definitions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurialism for researchers, policy makers and financiers, Further work on the barriers faced by social enterprises, More research into the social enterprise life cycle; onto how those barriers are overcome and how social enterprises compare with conventional businesses and more traditional philanthropy, Adding robust data to the existing case studies.