Content uploaded by Hussein M Maghrabie
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hussein M Maghrabie on Nov 29, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Hussein M. Maghrabie
1
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering,
South Valley University,
Al Shoban Al Moslemin Street,
Qena 83521, Egypt
e-mail: Hussein_mag@eng.svu.edu.eg
M. Attalla
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering,
South Valley University,
Al Shoban Al Moslemin Street,
Qena 83521, Egypt
e-mail: moha_attalla@yahoo.com
H. E. Fawaz
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Research Centre,
33 El Buhouth Street, Dokki,
Cairo 12311, Egypt
e-mail: ehf20012001@hotmail.com
M. Khalil
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering,
Sohag University,
Shark District,
Sohag 82514, Egypt
e-mail: mohamed_ramadan@eng.sohag.edu.eg
Effect of Jet Position on Cooling
an Array of Heated Obstacles
Numerical study of the effect of jet position (JP) on cooling process of an array of heated
obstacles simulating electronic components has been investigated based on realizable
k–emodel. Jet positions have been changed to impinge each row of obstacles consecu-
tively. The experiments have been achieved at three different values of jet-to-channel
Reynolds number ratio, Re
j
/Re
c
¼1, 2, and 4. In this study, a comparison between two
different cooling processes, cross flow only (CF) and jet impingement with cross flow
(JICF), has been achieved. The flow structure, heat transfer characteristics, and the
pumping power have been investigated for different jet positions. The results show that
the jet position affects significantly the flow structure, as well as the heat transfer charac-
teristics. According to the results of average heat transfer coefficient and the pumping
power, the more effective jet position for all values of jet-to-channel Reynolds number
ratio (1, 2, and 4) is achieved when the jets impinge the third row of obstacles (JP3).
[DOI: 10.1115/1.4036788]
Keywords: heated obstacle, cross flow, jet impingement, jet position, realizable k–e
model, average heat transfer coefficient
1 Introduction
Recently, growing utilization of electronic devices to perform
many processes is accompanied by an increase in heat dissipation
that has an adverse effect on the device performance as well as on
its lifetime. There are many cooling techniques for electronic devi-
ces, such as air cooling, spray cooling, phase change material
cooling, and heat pipe cooling. Air cooling is considered an effec-
tive way due to its simplicity in design, operation, and size
requirements.
Cooling an array of heated obstacles simulating electronic com-
ponents using air with CF has been investigated widely in the last
decades. The flow structure and the distribution of convective heat
transfer coefficient have been investigated by Meinders et al. [1].
The flow structure around the first obstacle subjected to CF is
characterized as: LHV, which is produced before the lower part of
the front face; side vortices (SV) that are generated on both sides;
top vortex (TV) that is produced on the top face; and arch-shaped
wake vortex (WV) that is generated behind the rear face as shown
in Fig. 1(a). However, the other obstacles are rounded only by
WV. The interobstacles distance (S) has a significant effect on
flow structure and heat transfer distribution [2,3]. For larger S, the
flow structure and the heat transfer distribution around each obsta-
cle were similar [4,5]. Furthermore, obstacle geometry has a sig-
nificant effect on heat transfer characteristics; the wider the
obstacle, the higher the heat removal rates [6,7]. The placement of
obstacles, the thermal wake effect, and the flow inlet and outlet
location have been found as important parameters in the thermal
management [8–10].
In the area of cooling of electronic components, the use of jet
cooling only is not effective, especially for higher power density
components. However, using only jet impingement where the
impinged face of the obstacle is cooled effectively while the other
vertical side faces have bad cooling characteristics due to vortex
formation. Among an array of obstacles, the interobstacles space
occupied by secondary flow reduces heat transfer due to its recir-
culation and settling time. By installing the components in a chan-
nel with cross flow, the side faces are cooled by the CF, which
could drag most of the secondary flow produced in free jet cooling
process.
Recently, cooling a single electronic component as well as
array of components using JICF has a significant contribution.
The flow structure around a single cubical obstacle cooled by
JICF at Re
j
/Re
c
¼0.5, 1, and 1.5 has been investigated experimen-
tally [11]. The main flow features were LHV, upper horseshoe
vortex (UHV), SV, and WV. Moreover, the Re
j
/Re
c
affects the
location of stagnation point (SP) on the top face of obstacle. In
addition, the absence of UHV was observed for the lower values
of Re
j
/Re
c
. Sketch of the flow structure around an obstacle sub-
jected to JICF obtained by Masip et al. [11] is shown in Fig. 1(b).
The effects of channel height, jet diameter, and the shift of the jet
from the center of the obstacle on the heat transfer and pressure
drop have been investigated numerically [12]. The obstacle height
and jet-to-channel Reynolds number ratio have a significant effect
on the heat transfer rate, whereas the jet diameter and shifted dis-
tance have inconsiderable effect.
The variations of flow structure and heat transfer characteristics
of a single cubical obstacle of an in-line array due to changing
Reynolds number ratio, jet diameter and its shifted centerline, and
channel height have been studied experimentally and numerically
1
Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division of ASME for publication in the
JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS. Manuscript received
September 15, 2016; final manuscript received January 12, 2017; published online
July 6, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Qingang Xiong.
Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications FEBRUARY 2018, Vol. 10 / 011005-1
Copyright V
C2018 by ASME
Downloaded From: https://thermalscienceapplication.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 08/30/2017 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use