ArticlePDF Available

A Game Theoretical Study of “Heiritsu-sei”

Authors:

Abstract

In the context of “Shou-senkyoku=Hirei-daihyou=Heiritsu-sei, “Duverger's Law” will be studied using a game theoretical model. The main result is two theorems. The Negative Theorem is that exit from an election, which means implicit alliance, occurs only if the Condorcet winner is not the biggest party. The Positive Theorem is that except for the case of a chicken game without suitable focal point, the Condorcet winner always wins the election in the equilibrium.
32
33 小選挙区比例代表並立制関す ゲーム論的一考察
34
35 選挙区比例代立制に関するゲーム論的一考察
36
37 小選挙区比代表並立制に関すゲー的一考察
表I ス1.(#α>#β,#γ;#α>#β+#γ;#α+#β α>#β γ+#γ;;#α+#β>#γ)
A=最 党=コ ドルセ 者=A
表II ス2.(#α>#β,#γ;#α<#β+#γ;#α+#β α>#β γ+#γ;;#α+#β>#γ)
A=最 コン ドル 者=B
表III ス3.(#α>#β,#γ;#α<#β+#γ;#α+#β α<#β γ+#γ;;#α+#β>#γ)
A=最 ドル 者=B
3-1.(BがCよ もAの 勝 を好 む)
表IV ス3.(#α>#β,#γ;#α<#β+#γ;#α+#β α<#β γ+#γ;;#α+#β>#γ)
A=最 ドル 者=B
ス3-2.(BがAよ もCの 勝 む)チ
38
表V ス4.(#β>#α,#γ;#α<#β+#γ;#α+#β α>#β γ+#γ;;#α+#β>#γ)
B=最 党=コ ドル 者=B
39 小選挙区比代表並立制に関すゲー的一考察
40
124
A Game Theoretical Study of "Heiritsu-sei"
Junichiro WADA
In the context of "Shou-senkyoku=Hirei-daihyou=Heiritsu-sei, "Duverger's
Law" will be studied using a game theoretical model. The main result is two
theorems. The Negative Theorem is that exit from an election, which means
implicit alliance, occurs only if the Condorcet winner is not the biggest party. The
Positive Theorem is that except for the case of a chicken game without suitable
focal point, the Condorcet winner always wins the election in the equilibrium.
Article
In this article, the potential of “practicable science, ” which is the new trend in Japanese politics in the 21st century, is being discussed and examined, focusing on a series of researches on Japan's political reforms. There have been two major trends or academic tendencies in the discussions of the political reforms. One is the attitude of political researchers who express strong criticism on political practices and propose actual policies actively participating in decision making processes. The other is the trend where certain distance is kept from actual political practices but they clarify the political actors' behavior at micro level, the changes of political phenomena, and the consequences through an empirical analysis. Both trends spread rapidly during the period. The new wave of Japanese political science research in the 21st century will bridge these two trends and respond to the proposition of “practicable science.” Policy proposals, empirical analysis, and normative discussions represented in public philosophy need to share functions and cooperate consciously while complementing each other without excluding others. It will be indispensable in establishing “practicable science, ” the new trend in Japan's political science research.
Chapter
This volume brings together eight original essays selected to provide an overview of the developments in the spatial theory of voting. The spatial theory of self-interest and explores the consequences of this assumption for elite behaviour and for the choices voters make in representative and direct democracies. The book summarizes work in eight major areas: elections with possible entry by new candidates who have policy preferences, experimental testing of spatial models of committees and elections, elections with imperfect information about voting intentions, voting on alternatives that are linked to future decisions, elections with candidates who have policy preferences, experimental testing of spatial manoeuvres designed to alter voting outcomes, elections with experimental testing of spatial models of committees and elections, elections with imperfect information about voting intentions, voting on alternatives that are linked to future decisions, elections with more than two candidates under different election rules, and bureaucratic efforts to manipulate referendum voting. Recognized scholars in these areas summarize the major results of their own and others' work, providing self-contained discussions that will apprise readers of important recent advances.
Chapter
The two-party system has exhibited a remarkable stability in the United States and certain other countries. With the exception of recent work by William H. Riker (1976), however, no formal, rational-choice models have been developed to explain its persistence, or lack thereof.
Article
We analyze a formal model of electoral competition under plurality rule that is characterized by two novel features. First, rather than assuming a fixed field of candidates, we allow candidates to make decisions regarding entry, as well as location. Second, voters in our model are strategically rational, that is, they maximize utility over expected policy outcomes, rather than simply voting for the ideologically closest candidate. Given these assumptions, all equilibria in this model are such that the set of entrants locates at the median voter's ideal point. This result stands in sharp contrast to earlier models of multicandidate competition in which entry is not allowed and voters vote sincerely.
Article
The authors elaborate a model of electoral competition for a fixed number of seats in a legislature. The novel feature of this model is that candidates (or parties) not only choose spatial locations as platforms but also determine whether to enter the contest at all. In most previous spatial models, the set of candidates is specified exogenously. Here, however, the spatial positions and the set of candidates are determined endogenously. An equilibrium in this context is defined and results are proved, suggesting that entry may disrupt spatial equilibria. Finally, the authors compare their treatment of spatial competition with entry to that of Palfrey.
Article
Science involves the accumulation of knowledge, which means not only the formulation of new sentences about discoveries but also the reformulation of empirically falsified or theoretically discredited old sentences. Science has therefore a history that is mainly a chronicle and interpretation of a series of reformulations. It is often asserted that political science has no history. Although this assertion is perhaps motivated by a desire to identify politics with belles lettres, it may also have a reasonable foundation, in that political institutions may change faster than knowledge can be accumulated. To investigate whether propositions about evanescent institutions can be scientifically falsified and reformulated, I examine in this essay the history of the recent and not wholly accepted revisions of the propositions collectively called Duverger's law: that the plurality rule for selecting the winner of elections favors the two-party system. The body of the essay presents the discovery, revision, testing, and reformulation of sentences in this series in order to demonstrate that in at least one instance in political science, knowledge has been accumulated and a history exists.
Article
Previous investigations of strategic voting equilibria in mass electorates have looked only at single-member districts. I shall investigate such equilibria in multimember districts operating under the single nontransferable vote system. What appear to be the most natural equilibria conform to the M + 1 rule, according to which strategic voting in M-seat districts produces exactly M + 1 vote-getting candidates in equilibrium, any others having their support totally undercut. This result provides the beginnings of a formal underpinning for Reed's recent extension of Duverger's Law to the Japanese case. The model also generates specific and empirically testable hypotheses concerning the exceptions to the M + 1 rule that one ought to expect in equilibrium. I test these hypotheses with Japanese data. Finally, the model also reveals a type of strategic voting that is specific to multimember districts. I use Japanese data again to explore the empirical importance of this kind of strategic voting.