Content uploaded by Andrew John Hall
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Andrew John Hall on May 09, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
2010 Discussion Paper 11
STUDYING RURAL INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A FRAMEWORK
AND EARLY FINDINGS FROM RIU IN SOUTH ASIA
RASHEED SULAIMAN V., ANDY HALL, VAMSIDHAR REDDY, T.S. AND KUMUDA
DORAI
DECEMBER 2010
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This document is an output from the Research Into Use Programme (RIU) funded by
the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of
developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID.
ThisworkislicensedundertheCreativeCommonsAttribution3.0UnportedLicense.Toviewacopyofthislicense,visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/orsendalettertoCreativeCommons,171SecondStreet,Suite300,San
Francisco,California,94105,USA
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI2
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
STUDYING RURAL INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A FRAMEWORK
AND EARLY FINDINGS FROM RIU IN SOUTH ASIA
RasheedSulaimanV.1,AndyHall2VamsidharReddy,T.S.3andKumudaDorai4
Abstract
ThispaperaimstomaptheexperienceoftheRIUAsiaprojectsanddrawoutthemain
innovationmanagementtacticsbeingobservedwhilelayingthegroundworkforfurther
researchonthistopic.Itprovidesaframeworktohelpanalysethesortsofinnovation
managementtasksthatarebecomingimportant.Thisframeworkdistinguishesfour
elementsofinnovationmanagement:(i)Functions(ii)Actions(iii)Toolsand(iv)
OrganisationalFormat.Thepaper’sreviewofthedistributionofinnovationmanagementin
theAsiaprojectssuggeststhatitisnottechnologyaccess‐relatedtasksalonethatare
important,butthebundlingofthesewithotheractivities,whichincludethedevelopmentof
networks,advocacyforpolicychange,trainingandothernegotiatedchangesinpracticeand
action.Theimplicationforpolicyisthatwaysofsupportingthiswidersuiteofinnovation
managementtaskswouldgoalongwayinhelpingmakebetteruseofagriculturalresearch
inruraldevelopment.
Keywords:InnovationManagement,AgriculturalResearch,Innovation,Development,
Policy,ValueChainDevelopment,SouthAsia,InnovationTrajectory,Functions,Actions,
Tools,OrganisationalFormat
JELCodes:L26,L31,L33,N5,N55,O13,O19,O21,O22,O31,O32,O33,O53,Q13,Q16
RIUDISCUSSIONPAPERSERIES
1 HeadofAsiaResearch,RIUCRT,rasheed@innovationstudies.org
2 HeadoftheRIUCentralResearchTeam(CRT),andy.hall@innovationstudies.org
3 ResearchFellow,RIU,vamsidhar.reddy@innovationstudies.org
4 Researcher,LINK,kumuda.dorai@innovationstudies.org
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI3
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LISTOFACRONYMS5
1.INTRODUCTION8
2.MULTI‐LEVELUNPREDICTABILITY:THECHALLENGESOF
INNOVATIONMANAGEMENT10
FIGURE1:THEEXPANDEDDOMAINOFINNOVATIONSERVICESINADYNAMIC,
GLOBALENVIRONMENT14
3.THERIUPROGRAMMEINASIAANDITSINNOVATIONMANAGEMENT
HYPOTHESIS18
FIGURE2:INNOVATIONTRAJECTORYFORAPPLICATIONOFDSP
THROUGHRIU19
FIGURE3:DIFFERENTSTAGESOFSTAKEHOLDERARCHITECTUREIN
PROMOTIONOFDSP24
TABLE1:HYPOTHESISANDPROCESSINSIGHTS(INNOVATIONMANAGEMENT
RESEARCHQUESTIONSASSOCIATEDWITHRIUPROJECTSINSOUTHASIA26
4.WHATDOESINNOVATIONMANAGEMENTREALLYINVOLVE? 30
TABLE2:INNOVATIONMANAGEMENTFEATURESINRIUSOUTHASIA
PROJECTS36
5.DISCUSSION:TOWARDSANUNDERSTANDINGOFHOWTOMANAGE
INNOVATIONINORDERTOPUTRESEARCHINTOUSEINSOUTHASIA42
FIGURE4:INNOVATIONMANAGEMENTTASKS45
REFERENCES47
APPENDIX1:THERIUSOUTHASIAPROJECTPORTFOLIO 49
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI4
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ACMVD ‐Africancassavamosaicvirusdisease
ADB‐AsianDevelopmentBank
AFP‐AdivasiFisheriesProject
AIT‐AsianInstituteofTechnology
AKVAFORSK ‐InstituteofAquacultureResearchinNorway
BAIF‐BharatiyaAgroIndustriesFoundation
BARI‐BangladeshAgriculturalResearchInstitute
BELA‐BangladeshEnvironmentLawyersAssociation
BFRF‐BangladeshFisheriesResearchForum
BFRI‐BangladeshFisheriesResearchInstitute
CARE‐CooperativeAmericanReliefforEverywhere
CASRAD ‐CentreforAgrarianSystemsResearchandDevelopment,
Vietnam
CAZS‐CentreforAridZoneStudies,Bangor,UnitedKingdom
CBOs‐Community‐BasedOrganisations
CBSPs‐Community‐BasedSeedProducers
CFUGs‐CommunityForestUserGroups
CGIAR‐ConsultativeGrouponInternationalAgriculturalResearch
CIP‐CentroInternacionaldelaPapa(InternationalPotato
Centre)
COB‐ClientOrientatedBreeding
CPHP‐DFID’sCropPost‐HarvestProgramme
CPSL‐CentreforPromotingSustainableLivelihoods,India
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI5
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
CRS‐CatholicReliefServices
CRT‐CentralResearchTeam,RIU
DAE‐Bangladesh’sDepartmentofAgriculturalExtension
DASP‐DecentralizationofSustainableAquacultureProject
DFID‐DepartmentforInternationalDevelopment,UK
DoF‐DepartmentofFisheries,Bangladesh
DSP‐DecentralisedSeedProduction
EBRM‐Ecologically‐BasedRodentManagement
FAO‐TheUnitedNationsFoodandAgricultureOrganization
FAVRI‐FruitandVegetablesResearchInstitute,Vietnam
FECOFUN ‐FederationofCommunityForestUsers,Nepal
FORWARD ‐ForumforRuralWelfareandAgriculturalReformfor
Development
GATE‐GlobalAgritechNepalPrivateLimited
GFRAS‐GlobalForumforRuralAdvisoryServices
GIFT‐GeneticallyImprovedFarmedTilapia
GVT‐GraminVikasTrust
GYA‐GYAssociatedLtd.
ICAR‐IndianCouncilforAgriculturalResearch
ICF‐InnovationChallengeFund
ICLARM ‐InternationalCenterforLivingAquaticResourcesManagement
(RenamedastheWorldFishCenter)
ICUC‐InternationalCentreforUnderutilisedCrops
IDE‐InternationalDevelopmentEnterprises
IPM‐IntegratedPestManagement
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI6
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
LI‐BIRD‐LocalInitiativesforBiodiversityResearchand
Development
LINK‐LearningINnovationKnowledge
NEEFJ‐NepalForumofEnvironmentalJournalists
NEHHPA ‐NepalHerbsandHerbalProductsAssociation
NFEP‐NorthwestFisheriesExtensionProject,Bangladesh
NGOs‐Non‐GovernmentalOrganisations
NRM‐NaturalResourceManagement
ODA‐OverseasDevelopmentAdministration(RenamedDFID)
PCI‐ParticipatoryCropImprovement
PMCA‐ParticipatoryMarketChainApproach
ProSCAB ‐PromotingSustainableCoastalAquacultureinBangladesh
R&D‐ResearchandDevelopment
RAAKS‐RapidAppraisalofAgriculturalKnowledgeSystems
RDRS‐RangpurDinajpurRuralService
RIU‐ResearchIntoUse
RNRRS‐RenewableNaturalResourcesResearchStrategy
S&T‐ScienceandTechnology
SHGs‐Self‐HelpGroups
SWRM‐SocietyforWaterResourcesManagement
UK‐UnitedKingdom
UN‐UnitedNations
USA‐UnitedStatesofAmerica
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI7
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
1. INTRODUCTION
TheResearchintoUseprogramme(RIU),supportedbytheUK’sDepartmentfor
InternationalDevelopment(DFID),isamajordepartureinagriculturalresearchand
developmentpractice.Perhapsforthefirsttime,amajorinternationalsponsorof
agriculturalresearchhasestablishedasubstantiallearning‐orientatedprogrammethat
specificallyseekstounderstandhowresearchcanbestbeusedforimpact.Conceptual,
empiricalandpolicydebatesonthistopicareveryclearonhowthisquestionshouldbe
framed:namely,thatitisanissueofunderstandinghowtheprocessofinnovationcanbest
bemanagedandhowresearchcanbestbeorganisedsothatitisintegratedintothe
innovationprocesstoachievesocialandeconomicaspirations(forareviewofthis
perspectiveseeHalletal.,2010).
Whilethequestionisclear,findingwaystoexplorethisquestionempiricallyandina
systematicwayarefarfromeasy.Waysoforganisingandmanaginginnovationareusually
shapedbythecontextsinwhichtheyemerge(whicharethemselvesconstantlychangingin
unpredictableways),sotheideaofintroducingexperimental“treatments”becomeshighly
problematic.Tomakethesamepointdifferently,waysoforganisinginnovationarenot
clinical,neatapplicationsofstandardapproaches.Insteadthesearethemessyprocesses
thatariseasaconsequenceofpath‐dependent,historically‐determinedsituationsthatplay
outovertime,wherethoseinvolvedhavemadethebestofwhattheworldhasthrownat
them—forbetterorworse.Thedefiningfeaturehereisthatoflocalstylesofmanaging
innovationinthefaceofanever‐changingcontext.Inpracticethismeansthattheapproach
deployedisconstantlychanginganddeveloping.Thesameapproachmaynotwork
anywhereelseanditmaynotbefit‐for‐purposewhenthenextsetofunpredictableevents
arises,butitisthestartingpoint.Thebestthatpolicycandoistolookforpromisinggeneric
tacticsandtosupportadaptivebehaviour(HallandClark,2010).
RIUhasstruggledwiththeseissueswhenestablishingitsexperimentsbecause,inmany
senses,theprogrammehasdefineditselfbytheapproachtoinnovationmanagementithas
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI8
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
advocatedandpromotedinitsprojects:initiallyaninnovationsystems“approach”
(althoughitwasneverentirelyclearwhatsuchanapproachmightentail)andlateraprivate
enterprise‐ledapproach(alsosimilarlyfluidindefinition).Theseapproach‐caricaturesthen
becameafilterforselectingprojectsandmonitoringtheirperformance.Thispaper,
however,arguesthatifprogrammessuchasthisaretolearnhowtomanageinnovationfor
puttingresearchintouseforimpact,thekeyexperimentaldesignissueconcernscreating
theconditionsinwhichonecanobservedifferentcontextually‐relevantwaysofmanaging
innovationandthenlearninghowtheprincipalprotagonistsintheprocessadapttheir
strategiesinthefaceofunpredictedeventsandcircumstances.Throughamixtureofgood
luckandgooddesignRIUhasendedupwithaportfolioofprojectswhich,asthispaperwill
show,demonstratesenormousrichnessofinnovationmanagingexperience.Whatthen
supersedesthe“approach”/treatmentasthekeyanalyticaldevicefortheexperimentisthe
frameworkthatisusedtodrawlessons.
Thispaperdevelopssuchaframework,usesittomapsomeoftheexperiencesintheRIU
projectsinAsiaanddrawsoutthemaininnovationmanagementtacticsbeingobserved.
Theframeworkdistinguishesfourelementsofinnovationmanagement:(i)Functions(ii)
Actions(iii)Toolsand(iv)OrganisationalFormat.Thepaperbuildsuponandfurtherclarifies
theresearchdesignofRIUthatispresentedbyHalletal.(2010).Thatdesignmadeuseof
stylisedinnovationnarratives;thatistosaystylisedbroadapproachestoinnovation
(participation;public‐privatesectorpartners,etc.).Theframeworkpresentedinthispaper
seekstoexamineinmuchgreaterdetailtheinnovationmanagementtasksbeingusedand
thebundlingoftheseindifferentcontexts.Thishelpsmoveawayfromtheemphasison
stylisedgenericapproachesimpliedbytheinnovationnarratives,whichobscuretheeclectic
natureofinnovationmanagement.Thepaper,therefore,alsosetsthesceneforfurther
investigationusingthisframeworkofinnovationmanagementinRIUanditsroleinputting
researchintouse.
Thepaperbeginswithadiscussionofthenotionofadaptationasthisseemstobeacentral
driverofinnovationanditis,therefore,throughthislensthatthetaskofinnovation
managementneedstobeunderstood.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI9
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
2. MULTI-LEVEL UNPREDICTABLITY: THE CHALLENGES OF
INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
Thediscussionsonalternativeparadigmsofagriculturalresearchareasoldasits
deploymentfordevelopmentalpurposes.ReviewsofthesedebatescanbeseeninWorld
Bank,2006;Halletal.,2010andmanyotherplaces,sothesewillnotbepresentedhere.
Notableinthesedebatesistheprominenceofaninnovationsystemperspective.Theorigins
andinterpretationofthisperspectivehavebeendiscussedadnauseaminrecentyears.
Despitethesescholarlyeffortsitisstillnotentirelyclearwhethersuchextensivemusings
haveimpingedinanywayonthecommonnarrativeusedtoplanandevaluateagricultural
researchandinnovationefforts.Ratherthanattempttomakeyetmoreconceptual
contributionsonthistopicwewishtohighlightoneparticularelementofthesedebates,
whichseemstohaverelevancetoourexplorationofinnovationmanagementforputting
researchintouse.Thetopicisthenotionof‘adaptation’.
Inmanysensesagriculturaldevelopmenthasalwaysbeenanissueofadaptation.Inpart
thishasbeentheunderpinningoftheattemptstoupgradeagriculturalsystemsbyadapting
themwithnewtechnology,agronomicandanimalhusbandrypractices.However,
adaptationhasamuchlongerhistoryandmorefundamentalroleinagriculture.Paul
Richards(1989)sumsthisupverynicelywhenhetalksofagricultureasaperformance.By
thishemeansthatthetaskoffarmingisnotaroutineonethatisrepeatedyearafteryear,
butratheritisaone‐offannualshowwhereeachyearconditionsaredifferent(weather,
prices,familycrisisandfortunes,theWorldCup,war,cropandanimaldiseaseoutbreaks,
globalmarketandpoliticalconditions,etc.)andfarmershavetomuddlethroughandmake
thebestoutofit.
HallandClark(1995and2010)documentthismuddling‐throughprocesswithcasesfrom
AsiaandAfrica.Theydrawoncomplexsystemsthinkingtodescribetheevolutionary
dynamicoffarmingsystems.Intheir2010papertheydescribetheconsequencesofaplant
diseaseoutbreakinUgandaandpointoutthepath‐dependentsetofadaptationsthattook
placeincroppingpatterns,foodconsumptionpractices,economicactivitiesandsocial
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI10
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
relations—eachofwhichoperatedasaninterlinkedsub‐system.Theanalysisidentifiesthe
farmeratthecentreofanevolutionarymechanismusedtocopewithchangeandgives
primacytothecapacitytorespondtochangingcircumstancesthroughadaptationand
innovation.
LikeRichardsbeforethem,HallandClark(2010)explainthathouseholdsandrural
entrepreneursmakethebestoftheseshocksthroughadaptation,buttheseadaptive
capacitieshavetheirlimits.Theselimitsrelatemainlytothedisconnectbetweenthese
farm‐leveladaptivecapacitiesandprocessesandthehugearrayoftechnological,financial,
entrepreneurialandpolicyresourcesthatarereadilyavailableinsocietyatlargeandwhich,
ifproperlychannelledandlinked,couldbuildapowerfulcollectivecapacityforadaptation,
innovationandchange.Alas,thisbroad‐basednotionofcapacitybuildingisrarely
understoodinpolicycircles.Thegreatestironyofallisthatthisnotionofcapacitybuildingis
thesinglemostimportantmessagethattheubiquitousinnovationsystemsconceptprovides
andwhichthesesamepolicy‐makersnowmakesomuchof.Yet,westillseenational
governmentanddevelopmentinvestorsplanningandimplementingruraldevelopment
programmes(whichhaveastrongcapacitybuildingagenda—socialorganisations,
microfinanceandmicro‐enterprisedevelopment)entirelyseparatelyfromagriculturaland
otherformsofresearchandlearning.Inotherwords,despitegrandinnovationsystems
rhetoric,science,technologyandinnovationarenotactuallyconsideredworthintegrating
withruralcapacitybuildingefforts.Asaresultresearchcontinuestochurnoutfindings
whilesponsorsofthisresearchremainpuzzledbyhowthiscanbeputintouse.
Thereareanumberofpointsworthamplifyinghere.Thefirstisaboutcomplexityandthe
natureofsystemsthatexhibitthischaracteristic.Again,thisisatopicofdebaterifewith
seductivetrapsforconceptualmusing.Butkeytoourdiscussionhereisthewaythe
interactionsofmanyelementsofasystemproduceunexpectedandunpredictable
outcomes;HallandClark(2010)explainhowacassavadiseaseoutbreakinUgandaledtoa
differentroleforwomeninagriculturalproduction.Keskinetal.(2008)explainhowthe
developmentofthetouristindustryinEastAfricaledtoasuccessfulmeatprocessing
industryinKenya.ShambuPrasad(2005)describesthewayasoilfertilitytreatment
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI11
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
(spirulina)endedasafoodsupplement,promptedbytheneedsofearthquakerelief
programmes.
Ideasaboutcomplexityalsosuggestthatasthenumberofelementsinasystemincreases
thepaceandunpredictabilityofchangeincreasesaswell—andthisishappeningwhere
ruraleconomiesarebecomingmoreintertwinedwithnational,regionalandglobal
economicsystems(seeHall,2009).Inaworlddrivenbycomplexity,developmentsuccess
(beitinsocialoreconomicterms)isnotaresult,therefore,ofmasteryofaparticular
productiontechniqueorevenofknowledge‐basedcapacitiessuchasresearch.Rather,ina
worlddrivenbycomplexitysuccessisdeterminedbythecapacitytoadapt.Andbecausethis
involvesreworkingideas,resourcesandrelationsandlinks,adaptivecapacityissynonymous
withinnovationcapacityandthisisneedstobeviewedasacollectivemultidimensional
entity.Itincludesfarm‐levelprocessesanditincludespolicyandinstitutionalenvironments.
Itincludesskillsanditincludesnetworkslinkingthesetogether.Butthecriticaltake‐home
messageforourdiscussionisthatthiscapacitycannotbeconsideredintermsofits
componentparts.Capacityistheemergentpropertyofthesystemasawhole.
Thenextpointworthhighlightingisthatofpath‐dependency.Atitsverysimplestthismeans
thatthestartingconditionsofanyendeavourtendtoshapehowitproceeds.Thesame
appliestoinnovationandthenatureoftheconsequenttrajectorythatthisfollowsover
time.Bythesameargument,suchtrajectoriescannotreallybeunderstoodwithout
understandingtheirhistoricalemergence.TaketheCGIAR,forexample;whyisitlikeitisstill
(largely)acommodity‐focusedresearchinitiativeinpursuitoftechnologicalsilverbullets?
Agriculturalextensionisanothercaseinpoint;whyisitstillfocusedonanarrowinnovation
supporttasksuchastechnologytransfer?Theanswerliesintheirhistories.Thebroader
pointforourdiscussionhereisthatthisadaptivecapacitydiscussedaboveisalwaysgoing
tolookquitedifferentdependingonstartingconditions.So,insomeinstances,innovation
managementservices,suchasagriculturalextension,areprovidedbythepublicsector.But
incountrieswithadifferenthistoricaldevelopment,themarketorcivilsocietymaybethe
wayofprovidingsuchservices.Collectiveactionmayberoutineinsomecountries,but
almostimpossibletoorganiseinothers,sodifferentwaysofmanagingtheinnovation
processwillhavegrownupinthesedifferentsettings.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI12
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Thefinalpointworthamplifyingbringsusbacktotheroleofpolicyinanerademanding
adaptivecapacities.Whereasinthepastpolicywasseenasawayoforchestratingsocially‐
usefulinnovationtrajectoriesthroughprojectsandprogramme,HallandClark(2010)
suggestthattheroleofpolicywillbetoidentifyemergingnascentcapacitiesand
trajectoriesandsupportthem(seealsoHalletal.,2010).Thispresentssomeconsiderable
challengesforpublicpolicy.Forexample,whatmighttheroleofagriculturalextensionbein
thissortofsituation?FortheResearchIntoUseprogrammethisisactuallythekeyquestion
anditisatopiconwhichthereisnowconsiderabledebate.
Extension,asalreadyalludedtoabove,hasgotstuckasanagencyfortechnologytransfer
(RiveraandSulaiman,2009).Therecentinternationalclamouraroundtheestablishmentof
aGlobalForumforRuralAdvisoryServices(GFRAS)doesnotseemtohavebeen
accompaniedbyareconceptualisationofthismodeofinnovationsupportservices.Aswe
haveseentheadaptationtaskthatfarmersfacehasalwaysinvolvedmuchmorethan
technologicaladaptation.Asthecontextofagriculturebecomeevermoreintegratedwith
globalscalephenomena(climatechange,financial,tradeandregulatoryregimes,etc.)and
conditionsbecomeevermoreunpredictableanddynamic,adaptationassumesamuch
greaterimportanceandatascalethatincludesbutgoeswaybeyondfarm‐levelagronomic
practice.
LeeuwisandHall(2010)haverecentlyexploredwhatthecontemporaryadaptationagenda
mightmeanforinnovationsupportservices—thesearetheservicesneededtomanage
innovationwhenthisisunderstoodtotakeplaceinsystemsornetworksofdifferent
organisationsandchangingcontexts.Theyusetheexampleofclimatechangeasadriverof
adaptation,butarguethatthisisametaphorforarangeofopportunitiesandchallenges
beingfacedinthecontemporaryagriculturaldevelopmentscenario.Thecoreoftheir
argumentisthatinnovationisaprocessinvolvingarangeoftasks.Thesetaskstakeplacein
threedomains5:(i)TechnicalApplication(farming,agro‐processing,marketing)(ii)
OrganisationsInvolvedinSupportingApplication(research,finance,advisoryservices,input
5 Ugbe(2010)discussessimilardomainsinthecontextofimpactassessment.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI13
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
supply,marketplayersandcompanies)and(iii)ThePolicyDomain(legislation,regulation,
routinepractices).ThisisillustratedinFigure1below.
Figure1:TheExpandedDomainofInnovationServicesinaDynamic,GlobalEnvironment
TheInnovationSystemanditsContinuously‐EvolvingConfigurationsof
Organisations,InstitutionsandPolicy
Domain of traditional research and
extension services
Messages from
Agricultural Research Farmers
Agricultural
policies,
regulation
National knowledge
infrastructure
Other
policies and
regulation
Financial
services
Markets and
companies Civil society
Political
shocks
Sustainable
Economic and
Social
Development
driven by
Innovation
driven
DomainofInnovationSupportServicesfor
Adaptation
Climate
change
shocks
Market and
price shocks
Animal and
human
health
shocks
Energy
shocks
LeeuwisandHall(2010)
Giventheabove,researchanditsusecannowbeseenasbeingonepartoftheinnovation
managementtaskassociatedwithadaptation.However,thekeyinsightthatideassuchas
innovationsystemsthinkinghaveprovidedistorecognisethattasksinthesethreedomains
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI14
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
havelittlemeaningontheirown(seetheargumentearlierinthissectionoverthenotionof
adaptivecapacityneedingtoincluderuralandnationalresources,etc.).Insteadadaptation
andinnovationareunderstoodtoinvolveacoherentsetoftasksandactionsacrossallthese
domains.Inotherwordsadaptationisaboutmanaginginnovationatthesemultiplelevels.
Partlythisconcernsbringingtogetherdifferentideasandresourcesfromdifferentsources;
italsoconcernsgettingusersofideastoinfluencethedevelopmentandadaptationofideas
andtechnology.Inpartitisalsoaboutensuringthatthepolicyandinstitutional
environmentallowsinnovationtotakeplace.This,inturn,mightmeanenablingnewforms
ofcoherentactionthatunleashinnovation(forexample,newtypesofpartnershipsand
alliances),oritmightinvolvepolicyandinstitutionalchangethatallownewproducts,
servicesandapproachestobeimplemented(forexample,community‐basedresource
management).
Intheoldwayofthinkingaboutagriculturalinnovation,innovationwasataskrelatedtothe
productionofideasbyresearch,andthesupplyofthesebyextensiontofarmersandthen
theirconsequentuse.Innovationmanagementinthisearlierframing,therefore,wasabout
makingsurefarmerswereawareaboutnewideas.Ascanbeseenabove,theideaof
innovationasaprocessdistributedthroughouteconomicsystemsanddefinedbyamore
broad‐basedcapacityforadaptationgreatlybroadensthescopeoftheinnovation
managementtaskandpointstotheimportanceofarolethatisnotdirectlyinvolvedwith
innovation,butwhichinvolvesconnectingupdifferentelementsandhelpingcoordinate
coherentaction(Hall,2005).Thesewidertasksarereferredtovariously:somecallit
boundarywork(Kristjansonetal.,2009);othersrefertoitasintermediation(Howells,2006;
KlerkxandLeeuwis,2008)and,morerecently,theterm‘innovationbrokers’hasbeenused
(KlerkxandLeeuwis,2009).
Thecurrentliteratureonthesetopicspointstogenericinnovationmanagementtasksthat
onewouldexpecttoseeinaresearch‐into‐use‐typeexperiment(thisclassificationdrawson
anumberofsources,includingKlerkxandLeeuwis,2009,buthasbeenelaboratedonand
reorganisedbytheauthors).
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI15
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Functions
• Networkdevelopment
• Organisationofproducersandconsumersintogroups
• Enhancingaccesstotechnology,expertise,markets,credit,inputs
• Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange
• Technicalandfieldpracticesupportforpolicyformulationandpolicylearning
• Trainingonnewapproachesandwaysofworking
• Articulationofresearchandtechnologyneedsofusers
• Organisingforesightandvisionexercises
• Conflictresolution
• Reflectivelearning
Actions
• Brokering
• Convening
• Negotiating
• Facilitating
• Advocating
• Coaching
• Mediating
• Disseminating
Tools
• Innovationplatforms
• Researchanddevelopmentconsortia
• Policyworkinggroups
• Businessincubators
• Innovationchallengefunds
Organisationalformats
• Researchorganisations
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI16
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
• Publicadvisoryservices
• Civilsocietyorganisations
• For‐profitandhybridcompanies
• Industry/producer/userassociationsandothersectorcoordinatingbodies
• Thinktanks
• Third‐partytechnologybrokers
• Venturecapitalfunds
• Informationportals/specialistmedia/e‐commerce
Itisimportanttostressthattheoldinnovationmanagementtasksofprovidingaccessto
technologyarenotsupersededbythesenewtasks.Rather,theseoldtasksonlyhave
usefulnessaspartofawidersetoftasksthatallowinnovationtotakeplace.Forthe
questionofhowtoputresearchintouseforinnovation,understandingwhatthesewider
setsoftasksareandunderstandinghowtheyshouldbeoperationalisedandbywhomin
differentinnovationtrajectorieswithdifferentstartingpointsbecomescritical.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI17
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
3. THE RIU PROGRAMME IN ASIA AND ITS INNOVATION
MANAGEMENT HYPOTHESIS
HistoricalDevelopment
CommissionedbyDFIDin2006,theResearchintoUse(RIU)programmehastwopurposes.
Firstly,itistogetthebestresearchresultsfrompastDFID‐supportedresearchinto
widespreaduseinAfricaandSouthAsia.Secondly,itistodrawlessonsontheprocessof
puttingresearchintouse;inotherwords,toteaseoutwhenandunderwhatcircumstances
andsettingsarangeofdifferentapproachesbecomemoreorlessusefulinmakingthebest
useofagriculturalresearchasapolicyinstrumentfordevelopment.
InSouthAsia,RIUselected13projectsthroughacompetitivegrantprocessaspartofits
InnovationChallengeFund(ICF)andtheprojectinterventionsstartedinJuly2008.These
weremodest‐scaleprojects(budgetsintherangeof£150‐500,000overthreeyears),
buildingonearlierresearchbymembersofprojectteams.Asoriginallyconceivedtherewas
noorganisingprinciplefortheselectionofprojectsorforlessonlearningfromtheprojects.
FollowingareviewoftheprojectsinJune2009,theprojectportfoliowasreducedto11.The
reviewscreenedtheprojectsonthebasisoftwocriteria:(i)Wastherepotentialfor
achievingimpactatscale?Andwastherepotentialforlearninglessonsaboutputting
researchintouse?Theprojectsdroppedwereeithertooresearch‐likewithlowpotentialfor
impactorbecausetheydeployedimplementationstrategiesthatshowedlittlepromisein
termsofinformingtheprogrammeabouthowresearchcouldbeusedforinnovation.
FollowingthisreviewandthesubsequentappointmentofaCentralResearchTeam(CRT),
whichincludedauthorsofthispaper,theremaining11projectswereclusteredforlesson
learningpurposesalongthefollowinglines:
• ParticipatoryCropImprovementInnovation
• InnovationinValueChains
• InnovationinNaturalResourceManagement
• Others
AbriefdescriptionoftheprojectsisprovidedforreferencepurposesinAppendix1.More
detailsonprojectscanbefoundinVamsidharReddyetal,2010,andat
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI18
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
www.researchintouse.org.Asanexemplarweprovideadetailedhistoryofoneprojectso
thatreaderscangetasenseofthenatureoftheRIUprojectsand,particularly,thelocation
ofRIUactivitiesinthewiderhistoryoftheseinitiatives.
CaseStudyofanRIUAsiaProject:DecentralisedSeedProduction(DSP)inBangladesh
Thisprojectisfocusedonsettingupadecentralisedmicroenterprise‐basedsupplynetwork
tosupplyfingerlingsofanimprovedbreedoftilapia—theprojectreferstothisasfishseed
andtheapproachasdecentralisedseedproduction(DSP).TheprojectisledbyRangpur
DinajpurRuralService(RDRS),awell‐establishedandrespectedNGObasedinthenorthwest
ofBangladesh—anareaofheightenedruralpoverty,whereintegratedfishandrice
productionsystemsisakeylivelihoodstrategy.Theprojectbuildsonanextensivehistoryof
researchanddevelopmentactivitiesinBangladeshandinternationally.Thisinnovation
trajectoryisillustratedinFigure2below).
FIGURE2.INNOVATIONTRAJECTORYFORAPPLICATIONOFDSPTHROUGHRIU
Source:Reddy,VamsidharT.S.(2010)
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI19
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
DevelopingtheDSPapproach
Severallargelyun‐connectedeffortsseemtohavecontributedtothedevelopmentofthe
DSPapproach.Onestreamofeffortswasfirstlaunchedin1991byaprojectcalled
NorthwestFisheriesExtensionProject(NFEP)6innorthwestBangladesh.Theresearch‐
orientedstaffofNFEPattempteddecentralisedcommoncarpseedproductionthroughthe
collectionandthentranslocationofspawndepositedbyannualfloodsonaquaticplantsin
householdpondsandditchestoricefields.Theencouragingresultsofthisinitiative
promptedtheIntegratedRiceFish(InterFish)Project7topromotefishcultivationinrice
fieldsaspartofIntegratedPestManagement—fishatethelarvaeofpest.Duringthis
period,effortswerelimitedtocommoncarp.This,however,changedwiththeintroduction
ofGIFT(GeneticallyImprovedFarmedTilapia).Thesehadoriginallybeendevelopedby
ICLARM(renamedasWorldFishCenter)incollaborationwithmanyresearchand
developmentagencies8.TheAsianDevelopmentBank(ADB)helpedtheBangladesh
FisheriesResearchInstitute(BFRI)tointroduceGIFTin1994aspartofaprojecton
“disseminationandevaluationofgenetically‐improvedtilapiainAsia”.Thisstrainoffered
distinctadvantagesforfarmers.In1999,NFEPintroducedthisimprovedstrainoftilapiaas
partofaresearchtrialwithfarmers.TheGo‐Interfishproject,implementedbyCAREduring
2000‐2005,furtherpromotedtheproductionofcommoncarpandtilapia(GIFT)inrice‐field
plots.
AnotherstreamofeffortsthatcontributedtothedevelopmentofDSPwastheresultofa
collaborationbetweentheAsianInstituteofTechnology(AIT),WorldFishCenter(aCGIAR
centre)andtheInstituteofAquacultureintheUniversityofStirling,UKFinancialsupportfor
theseinitiativeslargelycamefromtheUK’sOverseasDevelopmentAdministration(the
predecessortoDFID)throughitsRNRRSprogrammeandtheAsianDevelopmentBank.
ThesepartnersworkedwithnationalgovernmentdepartmentsandNGOstoadvance
6 TheNorthwestFishersExtensionProject(NFEP)wassupportedbyDFIDintwophasesduring1988‐2000.Theregional
focuswastheimpoverishedNorthwestregionofBangladesh.NFEPtrainedandusedmorethan1,000fishseedtradersand
morethan250secondaryschoolteachersasextensionagents.Theyestablishedmorethan200modelvillagesinwhich
morethan9,000farmersreceivedtraininginaquaculture.
7 TheInterFishProjectwasimplementedbytheCooperativeAmericanReliefforEverywhere(CARE)withfinancialsupport
fromDFID.
8 ResearcheffortsfordevelopingGIFTwereinitiatedin1988throughacollaborationbetweenICLARM,theInstituteof
AquacultureResearchofNorway(AKVAFORSK),andthreePhilippineinstitutions:theFreshwaterAquacultureCentreof
CentralLuzonStateUniversity,theMarineScienceInstituteoftheUniversityofthePhilippines,andtheBureauofFisheries
andAquaticResources.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI20
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
technicalaspectsofdevelopingappropriatehatcherysystemsforlow‐costfreshwaterfish.
Asaresult,technologiesfortilapia(inbothcommercialandsmall‐holdersituations),small
carpandsnakeskingourami9weredevelopedorrefined.Throughthe“Aquaculture
Outreachproject”(fundedbytheODAunderitsRNRRSprogramme)theinitiativepromoted
improvedavailabilityofqualityfishseedforfarmersandexploreddifferentapproachesto
suitdifferentconditions.Asaresultoftheseefforts,theimportanceandusefulnessofseed
productionbyfarmersorseedproductionwithgreaterinvolvementoffarmerswas
established.Subsequently,aresearchprojecton“improvingfreshwaterseedsupplyand
performanceinsmallholderaquaticsystemsinAsia”(fundedbyDFIDunderRNRRS—R‐
7052)clarifiedmanyearlierperceptionsandfurtheradvancedknowledgeaboutfreshwater
fishseedproductioninAsia.TheDSPapproach,therefore,evolvedbycumulating
knowledgefromthesedifferentresearchanddevelopmentefforts.
EmergingdemandforDSPtoaddressproblemsinfreshwateraquaculture
Freshwateraquacultureisveryimportantforthelivelihoodsofvillagersinnorthwest
Bangladesh.Goodqualityfish‐seediscriticalforthesuccessoffresh‐wateraquaculture.
Althoughtherearemanypublicandprivatesectorhatcheries,theseexistinclustersandare
distantlylocated.Poortransportfacilities(fishseedisusuallytransportedbyseedling
tradersor‘patheelwalas’inmetalpotstiedtobicycles)andlongerdistancesresultinhigher
mortalityandtransportationcosts.Monsoon‐dependentfarmingresultsinhigherdemand
andhighercostsoffish‐seedduringpeakseasons.Allthesefactorsactasseriousconstraints
forsmall‐holderfarmerswhenitcomestoaccessinggoodqualityfishseed.Toaddress
theseissues,decentralisedfish‐fingerlingproductioninricefieldsbyfarmerswassuggested
asanoption,afterestablishingitsfeasibilitythroughtheeffortsmentionedabove.
Severalattemptsweremadetopopularisethisdecentralisedapproachbyagenciessuchas
theDepartmentofFisheries(DoF),BangladeshFisheriesResearchInstitute(BFRI),WorldFish
andseveralNGOs.Theseincludedspecialprojects,suchastheDecentralizationof
SustainableAquacultureProject(DASP)10andtheAdivasiFisheriesProject(AFP)11,to
9 Atypeoffish(biologicalnameTrichopoduspectoralis)
10 ImplementedbytheWorldFishCentreincollaborationwithabout40NGOsthroughoutBangladeshduring2000‐2006.
ActivitiesfocusedoncreatingawarenessaboutandtrainingNGOstaffonDSP
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI21
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
demonstrateitsusefulnesstofarmers:campaigningontheradioandtelevisionandthrough
theeffortsofNGOssuchasRDRS.Individualfarmerswhoparticipateddirectlyinthese
effortscontinuedtogrowfishseedintheirricefields.However,theapproachwasnottaken
upwidely.Themainreasonforthiswasthelackofanappropriatesupplychainandsupport
servicesmechanismtoensureregularsupplyofGIFTfingerlings,providenecessarytechnical
knowledgeandpurchasemultipliedfingerlings.(SeeFigure3lateroninthissection)
ApplicationofDSPthroughtheRIUinitiative
ItwasatthispointthatthesupportofRIUenteredthepicture.Toaddresstheconstraints
discussedabove,RDRSledaconsortiumofNGOsfromtheNorthwestregiontocollaborate
withpartnerswithspecificexpertise.TheseincludedIDEBangladesh(International
DevelopmentEnterprises)fortheirmarketdevelopmentexpertise,WorldFishCentreforits
technicalexpertiseandtheBangladeshDepartmentofFisheriesforitstechnicaladvisory
mandate.TheconsortiumbuiltthenecessaryorganisationalarchitecturetoapplyDSP.Rice‐
fieldfarmers,table‐fishfarmers,seasonalpondowners,andfingerlingtraderswereselected
andencouragedtobepartoftheinitiative.Rolestobeplayedbyeachofthemwere
specifiedandinteractionsamongthemfacilitatedbytheproject.Theyweresupportedwith
necessarytrainingandfinance.Afewselectedtablefishgrowers(pondowners)indifferent
regionswereencouragedtoplayrolesas‘satellitebroodrearers’(suppliersofGIFTbrood
fishtointerestedrice‐fieldfarmers).Anumberofeducatedandunemployedyouthfrom
localareaswereselectedandtrainedtoplaytheroleoffieldtechnicianstoprovide
motivationandtechnicalknowledge,andclarifyanydoubtsfarmersinterestedinDSPmay
havehad.WorldFishCentrerepresentativesandpersonnelfromtheDepartmentof
Fisherieshelpedthesefieldtechniciansthroughtechnicalbackstopping.IDE,whichhas
extensiveexpertiseindevelopingruralmarkets,designedandimplementedlocally‐specific
activitiestodevelopmarketsforfingerlingsandbuildrelationshipsamongdifferentactors
alongthefish‐seedsupplychain.TheDepartmentofFisheriespromotedandmanageda
“broodbank”toensureasustainablesupplyofbroodstocktosatellitebroodrearers.Some
individuals—selectedfromfingerlingtraders,rice‐fieldfarmersandtable‐fishgrowers—
werepromotedas‘localentrepreneurs’andwereprovidedwithnecessaryknowledgeand
11 WorldFishCentrepromotedDSPwithcommoncarp,GIFTandcarpinricefieldsinitsAdivasiFisheriesProjectin
northwest(Rangpur,DinajpurandJaypurhatDistricts)andnorthern(SherpurandNetrokonaDistricts)Bangladesh
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI22
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
skillstopromotetheDSPconcept,benefitingthroughincreasedbusinesses.Manylocally‐
relevantideaswereimplementedwithregardstothecompositionoffishspeciestobe
cultivated,sizeoftheditchandbundsinthericefields,feedingpatterns,ensuredwater
supplyduringdryseasons,etc.Thetacitknowledgeofdifferentfunctionaries(includingfield
technicians,rice‐fieldfarmers,‘satellitebroodrearers’,fingerlingtraders,nurseryowners,
fisherydepartmentofficials,NGOstaff,etc.)wasutilisedfordevisingtheseapproaches.
WhatisimportanttonoteatthispointisthatRIUresourcesweremainlyusedbytheproject
tohelpbringinpartnerstoaninitiativethathad,inmanysensesandinmanydifferent
forms,beeninoperationformorethan10years.Themainfeatureofwhatthepartners
actuallyusedRIUresourcesforwastoimprovethescopeandqualityofrelationshipsand
attendantprocessesnecessaryforinnovation.Inthiscasetheinnovationwasamarketing
andinstitutionalinnovationthatallowedpoorfarmerstoaccessandbenefitfromimproved
fishbreeds.ItalsoimportanttorealisethatRIUprovidednorecipeforhowtheseprocesses
shouldbemanagedandthiswasprettymuchleftuptotheresourcefulnessofthepartners
involved.Acriticalelementofthiswastheidentificationofskillsetsrequiredtoaddress
emergingissues.So,forexample,theprojectstruggledinitiallyasRDRShadlittlemarketing
expertise.ThiswasresolvedbybringinginIDE,whichhasastrongtrackrecordofsettingup
marketingsystemsforthepoor.Thismeantthatpatternsofpartnershipevolved
considerablyastheinnovationtrajectoryofDSPunfolded(seeFigure3)
Partofthistaskofselectingandmanaginganevolvingconfigurationofpartnerswasto
createawin‐winsituationforallparticipatingagencies.Inthisscenario,ricefieldfarmers
benefitedfromadditionalincomewithminimaladjustmentstotheirriceplotsandlittle
additionalinvestments.Table‐fishpondfarmers,whoactedas‘satellitebroodrearers’,
benefitedfromadditionalincomebysellingbroodfishtorice‐fieldfarmers.Theypromoted
rice‐fieldfingerlingproductionastheycouldsellbroodfishtootherfarmers.Traders
benefitedfromaccessinggoodqualityfingerlinglocallyandatbetterprices.Thus,theywere
alsokeenonpromotingrice‐fieldfingerlingproduction.Theproject,therefore,showsgreat
potentialforsustainability,giventhepromotionofDSPbydifferentagenciestofurther
individualbusinessinterests.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI23
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
FIGURE3.DIFFERENTSTAGESOFSTAKEHOLDERARCHITECTUREINPROMOTIONOFDSP
Situation1:
Relevantactors
andtheir
relationships:
Startingconditions
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
DoF
RDRS
WFC
Problems:
-Long distance transport – higher
mortality
-Higher cost during peak season
-Non availability of quality seed in
required quantity and quality
-Less role for poor people
-Lesser production of table fish
-Inefficient service delivery
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
DoF
RDRS
WFC
Problems:
-Long distance transport – higher
mortality
-Higher cost during peak season
-Non availability of quality seed in
required quantity and quality
-Less role for poor people
-Lesser production of table fish
-Inefficient service delivery
Source:Reddy,VamsidharT.S.(2010)
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
Rice-field
fingerling
producers
DoF
RDRS
WFC
-Problems with continuous
supplies of brood inputs
-Less motivation for interested
farmers to adopt
-Only farmers with whom it
was introduced are practicing.
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
Rice-field
fingerling
producers
DoF
RDRS
WFC
-Problems with continuous
supplies of brood inputs
-Less motivation for interested
farmers to adopt
-Only farmers with whom it
was introduced are practicing.
Situation3:
Relevantactors
andtheir
relationships:DSP
introducedbyan
creating
appropriate
architectureof
stakeholders
Situation2:
Relevantactors
andtheir
relationships:DSP
introducedin
individualfarmers’
fields
Increased
business
Increased
business
-Better quality
seed and timely
availability
-Choice of
different species
-Additional income
-Fish for home
consumption
-Better paddy crop
-Additional
income
-More promotion
–more income
-Additional income
-Fish for home
consumption
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
Rice-field
fingerling
producers
S-pond
fingerling
producers
Pond
based
brood
fish
farmers
Lead entrepreneurs/
Pvt. Extn. agents
Brood
bank
DoF
RDRS
WFC
Increased
business
Increased
business
-Better quality
seed and timely
availability
-Choice of
different species
-Additional income
-Fish for home
consumption
-Better paddy crop
-Additional
income
-More promotion
–more income
-Additional income
-Fish for home
consumption
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
Rice-field
fingerling
producers
S-pond
fingerling
producers
Pond
based
brood
fish
farmers
Lead entrepreneurs/
Pvt. Extn. agents
Brood
bank
DoF
RDRS
WFC
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI24
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
InnovationManagementHypothesesfortheRIUSouthAsiaProjects
ReviewingtheAsiaprojectproposalsrevealsthatthesewere,atbest,setupwitharather
simplistictheoryofchange.However,astheabovediscussionofoneoftheseprojects
indicates,theprojectshadimplicitworkinghypothesesthatshapedtheirorganisationand
modusoperandi,whichsuggeststhatamoresophisticatedtacittheoryofchangewasat
play.InexploringtheSouthAsiaprojectsitwouldseemusefultoretrospectivelyconstruct
thesehypotheses.Thishasbeendonebytheauthorsbasedonreviewsoforiginalproject
proposalsandthroughextendeddiscussionwiththeorganisationsimplementingthe
projects.Table1,whichispresentedlateroninthissub‐section,presentstheseimplicit
hypothesesandpredictswiderinsightsoninnovationmanagementthateachprojectcan
provide.
Threesortsofimplicithypothesesarepresented:
(i)TheRIUhypothesis
Atthetimeprojectswereconceivedthenarrativeoftheprogrammewasaboutputting
researchfindingsintowideruse.So,despiteprogrammerhetoricaboutsystemsof
innovation“approaches”,projectsfounditnecessarytopresentthemselvesashavinga
ratherarchaictechnologytransferlogic:forexample,producingmoreseedtoimprove
demandanduptake;institutionalinnovationsfromLatinAmericathatcouldbetransferred
toSouthAsia,etc.
(ii)Specificimplementationhypotheses
Theprojectsexplicitlypresentedarangeofnovelwaysthatthetechnologytransfer
hypothesiswouldbeoperationalised.Forexample,settingupseedcompanies,training
community‐basedgroups,linkingupnewvaluechains,etc.
(iii)Innovationmanagementhypotheses
Again,thesewereoftenunstatedhypothesesaboutthewayinnovationandtheuseof
researchwouldtakeplace.Theseare,perhaps,themostinterestingastheyrevealhow
projectsactuallywentaboutmanagingtheinnovationprocess.RIUstipulatedtheuseof
partnerships.However,asoursubsequentdescriptionandanalysisoftheprojectsreveal,
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI25
Re
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
searchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI26
projectteams(eveninpre‐RIUactivities)hadbeendeployingquitesophisticatedinnovation
managementstrategiesthatincludebutgobeyondpartnership.Someofthisinvolved
brokeringandmaintainingpartnershipsandrelationships.Butthiswasnotjustin
operationalfielddomainsbutalsoinpolicyandinstitutionaldomains.Asweshallseesome
oftheprojectsclearlyknewmanyoftheseinnovationmanagementtasksfromearlier
experience,whileothershadtolearnthemalongtheway.
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
TABLE1:HYPOTHESESANDPROCESSINSIGHTS(INNOVATIONMANAGEMENTRESEARCHQUESTIONSASSOCIATEDWITHRIUPROJECTSIN
SOUTHASIA)
ThemesandprojecttitlesRIUHypothesisImplementationHypothesisInnovationManagement
Hypothesis
Processinsight
Questions/Innovation
ManagementResearch
Questions
IParticipatoryCrop
ImprovementinAsia
ImprovingLivelihoodsin
SouthAsiathrough
SustainedAccesstoNew
TechnologiesinRainfed
Agriculture
[India,Bangladesh]
Increasingtheavailabilityof
seedswillincreasedemand
andtherebyenhance
furtherproductionanduse
ofqualityseeds
Subsidisedmassproduction
anddistributionofseeds
anditspromotionthrough
NGOsandCommunity‐
BasedSeedProducers
(CBSPs)
Originalresearchleaders
canconveneNGOpartners
toimplementscaling‐up
NewRiceandLegumeSeed
fromClient‐Oriented
Breeding(Nepal)
Increasingtheavailabilityof
seedswillincreasedemand
andtherebyenhance
furtherproductionanduse
ofqualityseeds
Subsidisedmassproduction
anddistributionofseeds
anditspromotionthrough
NGOsandCBSPs
Establishingseed
companiesunderNGOscan
supplyappropriateseedsto
poorpeople
Originalresearchleaders
cansupportNGOpartners
inscalingup
PovertyReductionthrough
CropIntensificationintoRice
Fallows(Nepal)
Increasingtheavailabilityof
seedswillincreasedemand
andtherebyenhance
furtherproductionanduse
ofqualityseeds
Subsidisedmassproduction
anddistributionofseeds
anditspromotionthrough
NGOsandCBSPs
Establishingseed
companiesunderNGOscan
supplyappropriateseedsto
poorpeople
Originalresearchleaders
cansupportNGOpartners
inscalingup
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
defined?
Whatarethe
mechanismsfor
managingtheuseofplant
breedingexpertisein
seedproduction?
Howareregulatoryand
policyissuesdealtwith?
Howdodifferent
organisationalformats
evolveindifferent
contextstodealwith
commercialproductionof
seeds?(Producer
companiesandNGO‐
sponsoredseed
companies)
IIValueChainInnovation
LinkingFarmerswith
MarketsforRuralProsperity
(Nepal,Vietnam,Cambodia)
Aninstitutionalinnovation
fromLatinAmericacanbe
adoptedandwidelyapplied
Linkingtheexistingactorsin
thevaluechain
Useprevioustrackrecordof
brokeringmarketsystem
developmenttodevelop
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI27
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
inNepalrelationshipsamongactors
inthevaluechain
CoalitiontoDiversifyIncome
throughUnder‐Utilised
Crops(India,Vietnam)
Pilotingcommunity‐based
production,processingand
marketingarrangements
willleadtopromotionand
uptakeofunder‐utilised
crops
Organisecropfairsand
establishgermplasm
orchardsandfood
processingparksatthe
communitylevelto
establishnewvaluechains
Internationalresearch
leaderscancoordinatethe
implementationofthis
activitythroughNGOsin
Indiaandthenational
researchsysteminVietnam
DevelopingFishSeedValue
ChaininBangladesh
Promotionofthe
decentralisedfishseed
productionapproachwill
increaseavailabilityof
qualityfishseed
Linkingactorsinthenew
valuechain
Acoalitionthatcombines
technicalexpertisewith
NGOsandmarketsystem
brokerscancreateanew
andsustainablevaluechain
defined?
Howdoestherelative
successofapproaches
thatestablishnewvalue
chaincomparewiththe
valueofstrengthening
existingones?
Whatarethe)
mechanismsfor
managingresearch
expertiseinvaluechain
development?
Howarewiderregime
changesininstitutions
andpoliciesdealtwith?
IIINaturalResource
ManagementCluster
IntegratedFloodplain
Management(Bangladesh)
TrainingmoreCommunity‐
Based‐Organisations(CBOs)
intheIntegratedFloodplain
Managementapproach
wouldleadtoitsscalingup
TrainingCBOsandbroker
theirlinkswithtechnical,
legalandpolicyexpertise
Researcherscanorganisea
coalitionwithlocalNGOs—
handlingimplementation
brokering—andalegal
supportpartner—handling
policybrokering
ReducingPovertythrough
InnovationSystemsin
Forestry‐ForestAction
Improvedgovernancein
communityforest
managementcanbe
achievedbytrainingmore
groups
TrainingCommunityForest
UserGroups(CFUGsfor
locallevelinstitutional
developmentandusingthis
evidencetoinfluencemacro
policy
SpecialNGOscanactas
brokersbetween
communitiesand
government
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
defined?
Howdoesoneaddress
changesintechno‐
institutionalregimes?
Whatbrokerage
mechanismsareusedat
field,organisational
(includingresearch)and
policylevels?Whatisthe
nature(what)and
operation(how)ofmicro
andmacropolicy
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI28
Re
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
searchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI29
brokering?
Roleofpolicybrokeringin
allowingresearchtobe
appliedathecommunity
level
IVOthers
RojiRoti:Promoting
SustainableLivelihood
Development(India)
Accesstocreditallowspoor
womentoaccess
productioninputsand
technology
Institutionaldevelopment
atcommunityleveland
brokeringlinkagesto
financialservicesandinputs
agencieswillcreatea
demandpullfordrawing
newtechnicalknowledge
Acombinationof
institutionaldevelopment
andbrokeringtoinputsand
serviceswillleadtothe
settingupofasustainable
hybridcompanythatdeals
withnon‐bankingfinancial
servicesandinputs
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
defined?
Whatistheeffectiveness
ofabusinessmodelthat
combinesfinancialand
technicalbrokering?
RatManagementforRural
Communities(Bangladesh)
Increasingthesupplyofrat
trapswillreducerat
population,ifcommunities
aretrainedincommunity‐
basedratmanagement
LocalNGOscantrain
communitiesand
companiescanmanufacture
rattraps
Technologytransferand
trainingadequatefor
widespreadadoptionofthe
technology
PromotingSustainable
CoastalAquaculturein
Bangladesh(ProSCAB)
Trainingfishing
communitiesinnew
technologiesleadstowide
scaleuse
Trainingandestablishing
enterprisegroupsbyNGOs
willconnectfishing
communitiestomarkets
andfacilitatetechnology
adoption
Researcherscanbrokera
coalitionthatwillleadto
localenterprise
developmentanduseof
researchfindings
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
defined?
Whatisthenatureand
operationofthesector
co‐ordinatingbody?
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
4. WHAT DOES INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REALLY INVOLVE?
Ourearlierdiscussionpredictedalargerangeofinnovationmanagementfunctions,actions,
toolsandorganisationalformats.WhiletheRIUprojectportfolioinAsiahasnot
demonstratedalloftheseitstillillustratesadiversityoftasksinvolvinginnovation
managementtoputresearchintouse(ThesearesummarisedinTable2lateroninthis
section).Itisalsonotablethatprojectsdonotjustdeployonefunctionoroneactionbut
clusterthese.Thefollowingpointsseemtobeimportant:
Functions
(i)Networkingandpartnershipbuilding
Withoutexceptionprojectshaveperformedthisfunction,buttherehavebeenanumberof
differentvariants.Mostprojectshavebuiltpartnershipstoimplementtheprojectandhave
oftennamedthesepartnersinprojectdocumentation.Theseprojectpartnersaredistinct
fromthoseinoperationalpartnerships—thatistosaypartnerships/networksthatthe
projectsoughttobuildtomanagetheinnovationprocess.Forexample,theprojectsdealing
withvaluechaindevelopmenthadtobrokerrelationshipsamongavarietyofmarketagents,
inputdealersandproducers.Theprojectsdealingwithpromotingseedsdevelopedthrough
ParticipatoryCropImprovementhadtonetworkwithseedgrowers,localagro‐vets(agro‐
inputsellers),millersandradiostations.
(ii)Settingup/Strengtheningusergroups
Settingupusergroupsandbuildingtheircapacityisanothercommonfunctionundertaken
byalltheseprojects.Community‐basedseedproducer(CBSPs)groupsinParticipatoryCrop
Improvement;community‐basedorganisations(CBOs)andcommunityforestusergroups
(CFUGs)inNaturalResourceManagement;self‐helpgroupsformicro‐finance,occupational
groupsundertheProSCABprojectoncommercialproductionofmarineproductsin
Bangladesh,etc.,areallsuchexamples,wheretheprojectseitherhadtoformorworkwith
existingusergroupstomanageinnovation.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI30
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
(iii)Training
Trainingusergroupsandotheractorsinthewiderimplementationnetworkisanother
importantfunctiontheseprojectshavehadtoundertake.Topicscoveredincludedquality
seedproduction,broodfishmanagement,fingerlingproduction,rodentmanagement,
democraticgovernanceofforests,enterprisedevelopment,businessskills,accountkeeping,
etc.Inotherwordsitwasbothtechnicaltrainingassociatedwithaparticulartechnology‐
basedinnovationaswellastraininginwideraspectsoforganisationalandinstitutional
development.
(iv)Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange
Aspolicyplaysanimportantroleinthewideruptakeofknowledge,alltheprojectsareeither
collaboratingwithpolicy‐relevantpartnersorarelookingforopportunitiestoengagewith
policyactorsatthenationallevel.WhilepromotingParticipatoryCropImprovement,the
projectsinNepalhadtoengagewiththeNepalAgriculturalResearchCouncilandtheNational
SeedBoardtobringaboutchangesinpoliciesrelatedtovarietalreleaseandseedlaws.This
wasessentialinordertogettheNGOsofficialrecognitionfortheirroleinplantbreedingand
releaseofvarietiesaswellastheirpromotionofgoodpractices,includingthepromotionof
community‐basedseedproducersingovernmentseedself‐sufficiencyprogrammes.
TheIntegratedFloodplainManagementprojectinBangladeshhadtoengagewithpolicies
relatedtoleaseofwaterbodiesandneededsupporttodealwithlegalchallenges.Theproject
isworkingcloselywiththeSocietyforWaterResourcesManagement(SWRM)—afederation
ofwatermanagementcommunity‐basedorganisations—toinfluencepolicies.Community‐
basedforestryenterprisescansucceedinNepalonlyiftheforestrydepartment’sexcessive
bureaucraticcontrolscouldberelaxed;thus,theFederationofCommunityForestUsers,
Nepal(FECOFUN)isanimportantpartnerinthecommunityforestryprojectinthatcountry.
BothNepal’sForestActionandtheBangladeshEnvironmentLawyersAssociation(BELA)have
extensiveexperienceinworkingforpolicychangeandarepartofseveralpolicy‐level
consultations.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI31
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
(v)Enhanceaccesstotechnology,expertise,markets,creditsandinputs
Ruralcommunitiesneedaccesstoawidersetofsupportandotherservicestoapplythe
newknowledgebeingpromoted.Projects,therefore,hadtoenhanceaccesstotechnology,
expertise,markets,creditandinputs.Forinstance,theRojiRotimicrofinanceprojectbegan
itsactivitiesbyformingself‐helpgroupsbeforelendingtothem,andthenlinkingthe
communitiestosourcesofinputs,technology,sourcesoflargercreditandtechnicaltraining
oncropproductionandsmallenterprisedevelopment.ThePro‐SCABprojectonpromoting
aquaculturetechnologiessetuptwocrabhatcheriestosupportenterprisegroupsoncrab
fatteningenterprisespromotedundertheproject.Italsohadtolinkthegroupstomarket
agents(retailersandexporters)inthefishvaluechain.Theprojectonpromotingcommunity
valueadditioninitiativesinunder‐utilisedcropshadtosearchforsmall‐scaletechnologies
forprocessingmilletinIndiatosupportthecommunitiesitwasworkingwith.
(vi)Reflectivelearning
Reflectivelearningisanimportantfunctioninmostoftheprojectsandthisisevidentfromthe
widerangeofconsultation‐basedactivitiesundertaken.Theseincludereviews,reflections,
experiencesharingworkshops,negotiationsamongdifferentgroups,studyvisits,settingup
resourcecentres,etc.Thisismoreevidentinthenaturalresourcemanagementcases,where
workshopstoreflectonpastprogressanddecideonfuturecourseofactionareheldregularly.
Actions
Awiderangeofactionshadtobetakentomanageinnovationandthisismoreorless
commonacrossallprojects.
(i)Convening
Asinnovationmanagementrequiresperformingseveralfunctionsandcoordinatingawide
rangeofpartners,conveningmeetings,platforms,consultations,anddiscussionsamongthe
implementationandoperationalteamsisanessentialactionthatneedstobeundertakenby
projectteams.Whiletheleadpartnerhasbeendoingthisactivityattheimplementation
level,otherpartnershavebeenperformingthisactivityatthefieldlevelwithother
implementationpartners.Whoperformsthisactionisessentiallydecidedbasedonthe
natureaswellaslocationofthetaskathand.Forinstance,inthevaluechainprojectin
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI32
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Nepal,whiletheleadpartnerIDEconvenedprojectmeetingsandinterfacedwithpolicy(the
DepartmentofAgriculture,theNationalAgriculturalResearchCouncil,donors,etc.)the
MarketingandPlanningCommitteeconvenedotherkindsoftrainingandlinkingactivitiesat
thecommunity‐managedcollectioncentre‐level.
(ii)Brokering
Innovationmanagementessentiallydependsoncreatingmany‐to‐manyrelationships
amongthewiderangeofactors.Thisaction,whichinvolvesdeveloping,maintainingand
strengtheningtheserelationships,isincreasinglyconsideredanimportantfeatureof
innovationmanagement.ThebrokeringintheRIUprojectswasfoundtobeimplementedby
differentorganisationsatdifferentlevels,dependingontasksathandandexpertise.Some
organisationsinvolvedhavealonghistoryofbrokering.Forinstance,IDEisconsideredan
importantmarketdevelopmentbrokerandunderRIUinNepalandBangladeshithasbeen
brokeringrelationshipsamongtheactorsinthehorticultureandfreshwaterfisheriesvalue
chainrespectively.ForestActioninNepalisapolicybrokerandawell‐recognisedthinktank
onforestpolicymanagementandundertheRIUprojectithasbeenbrokeringrelationships
withthefederationofcommunityforestusergroupsandthestateforestdepartment.
(iii)Facilitating
Thisisamoreoperationaltask,wheretheleadpartnerneedstoensuredifferentsetsof
activitiestakeplace.Forinstance,thenetworkofNGOsassociatedwiththeIntegrated
FloodplainManagementprojectinBangladeshfacilitatesdiscussionsofcommunity‐based
organisationmembersaroundtheissueofParticipatoryActionPlanDevelopment.The
CentreforPromotingSustainableLivelihoods(CPSL),thespecialistmicro‐financeNGOinthe
stateofBiharinIndia,facilitatespoorwomentolinkwithsourcesoftechnicalexpertise
relatedtoagricultureandsmallhousehold‐levelenterprisedevelopment.Similarly,Forward
andLi‐bird,thetwoNGOsinNepal,facilitatethecommunity‐basedseedproducersto
accesspublicfundingfromgovernmentsourcestostrengtheninfrastructure.
(iv)Coaching
Thisactioniscloselyrelatedtobuildingcapacitiesofusergroupsandotherpartner
organisationsthrough‘hand‐holding’sothattheycanbetterarticulatetheirneeds,
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI33
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
perceptionsandviewstoothers.Thisinvolvessometraining,butissomethingmorethan
that.Forinstance,inthecommunityforestmanagementprojectinNepal,formationof
hamlet‐levelcommitteesandthematiccommitteeshavehelpedruralcommunitiesto
understandclearlytherolesandfunctionsofcommunityforestusergroupsandhowto
managethem.Similarly,ForwardandLi‐birdhavebeencoachingcommunity‐basedseed
producers(CBSPs)onimprovingtheirbusinessskills.Itisthiskindofcoachingthathas
allowedtheCBSPstopartnerwiththenewseedcompaniesbeingputinplacebythe
project.Thevaluechainprojectonpromotingdecentralisedfishseedproductionin
Bangladeshiscoachingactorsinthevaluechainonmanagingproduceinawaythatwill
allowthemtosustainandexpandthisenterprise.
(v)Advocating
Advocatingforchangesinpoliciesandinstitutionsisacriticalactivityforsuccessful
innovationmanagement.Invitingpolicy‐relevantstafffromgovernmentagenciesinproject
deliberationsheldatdistrictandnationallevelsisacommonly‐usedactivityacrossvarious
projects.OrganisationssuchasBELAandForestActionaremembersofcommitteesand
policyworkinggroupsformedbythegovernmentsinBangladeshandNepal,respectively.
ThisallowsthemtopresentevidencefromRIUprojectstoadvocateforrelevantchangesin
policy.Anotherstrategyemployedistoworkwithfederationsofusergroups,whichare
relativelymorepowerfulinademocraticset‐up.PartneringwithFECOFUN(theFederation
ofCommunityForestUserGroups)andSWRM(afederationofCommunity‐Based
Organisations)allowstheNaturalResourceManagementprojectsunderRIUtoadvocate
better.
(vi)InformationDissemination
Althoughthisisatraditionalactivity,ithasanimportantroleininnovationmanagement.
Whatisinterestinghereisthepowerofthisactivitywhenperformedinrelationtotheother
setsofactivitiesmentionedabove.TheParticipatoryCropImprovementprojectsinNepal
usedFMradios,whichareverypopularinruralNepal,todisseminateinformationonthe
availabilityandsignificanceofseedsproducedbythecommunity‐basedseedorganisations.
TheratmanagementprojectinBangladeshhasbeenpromotingimprovedratmanagement
practicesonnationaltelevision.ThecommunityforestmanagementprojectinNepalhas
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI34
Re
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
searchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI35
investedresourcesincommunityradiostationsinNepaltosensitiselistenerstonewways
ofgoverningcommunity‐managedforests.
(vii)Negotiating
Thisactivityinvolvestheprocessofreachingasatisfactorycompromiseoragreement
betweenindividualsorgroups.Forinstance,conflictsbetweenfarmersandfishermenover
dryseasonwaterareacommonfeatureinthefloodplainsofBangladesh.Throughaseries
ofworkshopstheprojectonIntegratedFloodplainManagementreachedaconsensus
betweentwoparties,ultimatelyusingtechnologicalandinstitutionaloptionstomaximise
floodplainproductivity.Hamlet‐levelandthematiccommitteesformedbyNepal’s
communityforestmanagementprojectnegotiateoverrightsofmarginalisedandpoor
peopleatforestusergroupmeetings.
(viii)Mediating
Thisisaformofconflictresolutioninwhichthemediatortriestoimprovedialoguebetween
disputantstohelppartiesreachanagreement.Forinstance,inthefloodplainmanagement
projectinBangladeshcommunity‐basedorganisationsareoftenatoddswithruralelites
overissuesofleasingandusingwaterbodies.TheBangladeshEnvironmentLawyers
Association(BELA)advisesandsupportsCBOsbutalsomediatesbetweentheCBOsandthe
ruralelitestowardreachingsomesortofresolutionoutsidethecourts.
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Table2:InnovationManagementFeaturesinRIUSouthAsiaProjects
Themesandproject
titles
InnovationManagementFeatures
FunctionsActionsToolsOrganisationalFocus
IParticipatoryCrop
Improvementin
Asia
Improving
LivelihoodsinSouth
Asiathrough
SustainedAccessto
NewTechnologies
inRainfed
Agriculture
(India,Bangladesh)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Settingupusergroups(e.g.,organisingseedproducers)
Training(e.g.,ontechnicalaspectsandbusinessskills)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,seedlaws
andvarietalrelease)
Convening
Brokering
Facilitating
Advocating
Coaching
Graincashseed
banks
Producer
Company
UK‐based
/Internationalcrop
researchgroup
NewRiceand
LegumeSeedfrom
Client‐Oriented
Breeding(Nepal)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Settingupusergroups(e.g.,organisingseedproducers)
Training(e.g.,ontechnicalaspectsandbusinessskills)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,seedlaws
andvarietalrelease)
Convening
Brokering
Facilitating
Coaching
Advocating
Disseminating
Information
Community‐
Basedseed
producergroups
NGO‐ledprivate
commercialseed
production
company
CivilSociety
Organisation
For‐profithybrid
company
Povertyreduction
throughcrop
intensificationinto
ricefallows(Nepal)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Settingupusergroups(e.g.,organisingseedproducers)
Training(e.g.,ontechnicalaspectsandbusinessskills)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,seedlaws
andvarietalrelease)
Convening
Brokering
Facilitating
Advocating
Coaching
Disseminating
Information
Community‐
Basedseed
producergroups
NGO‐ledprivate
commercialseed
production
company
CivilSociety
Organisation
For‐profithybrid
company
IIValueChain
Innovation
LinkingFarmersNetworkdevelopmentFacilitatingParticipatoryMarketdevelopment
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI36
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
withMarketsfor
RuralProsperity
(Nepal,Vietnam,
Cambodia)
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Training(e.g.,trainingmarketcommitteememberson
leadershipdevelopment,accountkeeping,product
marketing)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,usingthe
advisorycommitteescomprisingpolicy‐relevantstafffrom
thegovernmentforpresentingtheapproachandresultsto
facilitatewideruptakeofthisapproachbytheGovernment
ofNepal)
Convening
Brokering
MarketChain
Analysis
ThematicGroups
MarketPlanning
Committees
ProjectAdvisory
Committees
Non‐profitNGO
Coalitionto
diversifyincome
throughunder‐
utilisedcrops(India,
Vietnam)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Training(e.g.,onproductionandprocessingaspectsto
producergroups)
Articulationofresearchandtechnologyneedsofusers(e.g.,
demandfornewtechnologiestodealwithcommunity‐level
processingofmilletinIndia)
Convening
Facilitating
Community
germplasm
orchards
VillageCropfairs
Foodprocessing
parks
International
Research
Organisation
Developingfish
seedvaluechainin
Bangladesh
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Traininganddemonstrationofnewapproachesandwaysof
working(e.g.,trainingonbroodfishmanagement,fingerling
production,establishinganewsustainablevaluechain)
Marketpromotionandmarketplacedevelopment
(e.g.,postersandsignboardsanddevelopinganewfingerling
marketplace)
Convening
Facilitating
Brokering
Valuechain
development
Useoflead
entrepreneurs
NGO
IIINaturalResource
Management
Cluster
Integrated
Floodplain
Management
(Bangladesh)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Traininglocalgroups(e.g.,trainingtocommunity‐based
Convening
Negotiating
Brokering
Advocating
Community‐
BasedUser
groups
LegalsupportNGO
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI37
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
organisationsonIntegratedPestManagement,water
management,etc.andorganisingexposurevisits)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,training
communityleadersonpolicies,laws,advocacyandlobbying)
Enhanceaccesstotechnology,expertise,markets,credit
andinputs(e.g.,linkingcommunity‐basedorganisationsto
localserviceproviders)
Conflictresolution(e.g.,out‐of‐courtsettlementthrough
negotiationandlegalsupportwhenrequired)
Reflectivelearning(e.g.,regularworkshopstoreflecton
progressanddecideonfuturecourseofaction)
Supporttopolicylearning(e.g.,workshopsandconventions
onaccessandlegalobstacles)
MediatingParticipatory
ActionPlan
Development
Community
resourcecentres
Policyworking
groups
ReducingPoverty
throughInnovation
SystemsinForestry
(Nepal)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Technicalandfieldpracticesupporttopolicyformulation
andpolicylearning
(e.g.,drawingpolicy‐relevantlessonsfromfield
implementationandusingthisforpolicydeliberationsat
mesoandmacrolevels)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,
promotingpolicy‐relevantfindingsthroughforestpolicy
seminarseries,amonthlydeliberationorganisedbyForest
ActiononforestpolicygovernanceinNepal)
Strengtheningusergroups(e.g.,Trainingcommunityforest
usergroupsanddecentralisedhamlet‐levelcommitteeson
democraticgovernanceofforestsanduseofcommunity
radiotodisseminatebestpractices)
Reflectivelearning(e.g.,useofcluster‐levelsharing
workshops,districtlevelmeetingsandnationalworkshops)
Convening
Negotiating
Brokering
Advocating
Mediating
Disseminating
Information
Thematic
Committees
Policyworking
groups
Community‐
Basedresource
centres
Cluster‐level
sharing
workshops
ForestPolicy
SeminarSeries
Policythinktankand
actionresearchNGO
IVOthers
RojiRoti:Promoting
Sustainable
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
Brokering
Financing
Non‐Banking
Financial
International
Consultancy
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI38
Re
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
searchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI39
Livelihood
Development
(India)
network)
Accesstocredit,technicalexpertiseandinputs(e.g.,
traininglocalvolunteerstoactasasourceofmicro‐credit,
productioninputsandtechnicalknowledge)
Advocatingforpolicyandinstitutionalchange(e.g.,sharing
lessonswithothermicrofinanceinstitutions,trainingother
agenciesinadoptingthisapproachtoruralservicedelivery
andliaisingwiththeindustryassociationonmicrofinance)
Facilitating
Company
Farminput
intermediary/
distributor
Company
RatManagement
forRural
Communities
(Bangladesh)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Training(e.g.,communityrodentmanagementanduseof
improvedrattraps)
Convening
Facilitating
Research‐
Extension‐
Private
manufacturer
consortium
LocalNGO
Promoting
SustainableCoastal
Aquaculturein
Bangladesh
(ProSCAB)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Organisinglocalgroups(e.g.,settingupoccupational
groups)
Training(e.g.,trainingfarmersonimprovedtechnologies
andsettingupenterprises)
Accesstoinputsandmarkets(e.g.,establishinghatchery
andlinkstotradersandhotelindustry)
Convening
Facilitating
Mediating
Researchand
Extension,NGO
consortia
PrivateHatchery
SectorCo‐ordination
body
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Tools
Toolsaretheformatsoroperationalmechanismsusedinprojectstomanageinnovation—
innovationplatformsbeingthemostcommonly‐cited,albeitlesstangibleoption.Thegrain
cashseedbankisanothertooloramechanismadoptedatthecommunity‐leveltohelp
resolvetheissueofseedavailability.Community‐basedseedproducergroups,producer
companiesandotherorganisationalformssuchasNGO‐ledprivatecommercialseed
productioncompaniesareallformatsthatallowbringingtogetherdifferentactorsand
complementaryknowledgeneededformanaginginnovation.ParticipatoryMarketChain
AnalysisisatoolusedtostrengthenthevaluechainintheIDE‐ledprojectinNepal.To
implementthisapproach,otherformsofplatformshadtobecreated,includingthematic
committees,marketingandplanningcommittees,etc.Community‐basedgermplasm
orchardsandfoodprocessingparksareothertoolsusedinthevaluechainprojects.
Communityresourcecentresareusedastoolsforknowledgesharinganddisseminationin
theNaturalResourceManagementprojects.Advisory/steeringcommitteesaretoolsto
enhancevisibilityoftheinterventionstopolicy‐makers.
Organisationformats
ThereisadiversityoforganisationsleadingtheRIUinitiatives.Thesevaryfrominternational
researchinstitutes(suchasCAZS,ICUC),NGOs(Li‐Bird,Forward,RDRS,AidComilla),private
consultingfirms(GYA),specialistmarketbrokeringNGOs(IDE),legalsupportNGOs(BELA),
policythinktanks(ForestAction)andsectorco‐ordinationbodies(BFRF).Themannerin
whichprojectcoalitionshavebeenformedbysuchdiverseorganisationshaspartlytodo
withthehistoryorevolutionoftheseinitiativesovertheyears.Itisthispath‐dependency
thathasledtotheemergenceofthiswidediversityoforganisationalformatsconvening
theseinitiatives.Anotherreasonforthisdiversityisthediversityinfunctionsandactivities
thatisneededforinnovationmanagementandthecomparativeadvantageofcertainkinds
oforganisationsinleadingsuchinitiatives.Forinstance,leadershipbyanorganisationsuch
asForestActioniscriticalforpromotinginstitutionalandgovernanceinnovationin
communityforestmanagementinNepal,whereasoneneedsanorganisationlikeIDEin
Nepaltoleadaninitiativethatreliesonstrengtheningtherelationshipsamongvarious
actorsinthevaluechain.Bothhavespecialexpertiseandcredibilitywhenitcomesto
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI40
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
dealingwiththesechallenges.Whileresearchersledmanyofthepreviousinitiativesthat
focusedonthegenerationofnewknowledge,inmostofthecasestheyplayasecondaryor
supportingroleasthenatureofleadershipandknowledgerequiredforinnovation
managementismuchbroaderthanwhatresearcherscanbringin.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI41
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
5. DISCUSSION: TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF HOW TO
MANAGE INNOVATION IN ORDER TO PUT RESEARCH INTO USE
IN SOUTH ASIA
Thepurposeofthispaperistosetthesceneratherthandrawdefinitiveconclusionsabout
RIU’sprojectsinAsia.Whatdoesittellusaboutstudyingruralinnovationmanagementfor
puttingresearchintouse?Andwhataresomeofthewiderimplicationsforpolicyand
practice?Thefollowingobservationsmightbeuseful.
TheframeworkdevelopedinSection3forlookingatinnovationmanagementseemstohave
beenusefulintermsofunpickingthefine‐graineddetailaboutwhatisactuallyinvolvedin
thistask.TheRIUresearchdesign(seeHalletal.,2010)hadsuggestedexploringinnovation
forputtingresearchintousethroughthelensofsixinnovationnarrativesasfollows:1)Poor
User‐LedInnovation2)Public‐PrivatePartnership‐LedInnovation3)CapacityDevelopment‐
LedInnovation4)Below‐the‐Radar‐LedInnovation5)Investment‐LedInnovation6)
ResearchCommunication‐LedInnovation.Halletal.(2010)acknowledgethatthese
narrativesareoverlappingandthattheyarestylisedpolicyoptions.Theuseofthe
innovationmanagementtaskframeworkdeployedinthispaper,however,seemstobea
moreusefulwayofcapturingthebroadscopeandeclecticnatureofinnovation
management.Itavoidsgettingcaughtupinthedilemmaofdecidingwhichnarrativebest
describesaparticularprojectoractivity.Similarly,itavoidsthetendencytopigeon‐hole
groupsofactionasbeingan‘approach’.Instead,ithasamuchmorepragmaticflavour,
focusingonwhatisactuallybeingdoneandworryinglessaboutwhatitiscalled.
WhatquicklybecomeapparentwhenonelooksatthedetailofRIUprojectsisthattheway
innovationismanagedisahighlyiterativeprocess.Thisisparticularlyapparentwhenone
takesamorehistoricallookattheinnovationtrajectory,liketheoneonfishseed.Buteven
intheconfinesoftheRIUprojectsthereisiteration;again,anexamplefromthefishseed
projectisthewayapartnerwithmarketingsystemsexpertiseneededtobebroughtin.This
raisesquestionsabouthowexperimentsshouldbeorganisedandstudied.Oneoption
wouldbetoorganisetheseasaction‐learningoraction‐researchprojects,wherethe
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI42
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
functionofresearchistobothhelpdriveiterationaswellashelpdrawwiderlessons.RIU
has,however,setupitsresearchactivitiesinawaythatisoperationallyandadministratively
separatefromtheprojectsthatitisderivinglessonsfrom.Therearepragmaticreasonsfor
this—notleastofwhichwasthefactthattheprojectsstartedsome2yearsbeforethe
researchwasstarted.Moreimportantly,however,sincethepurposeofRIU’sresearchisto
informpolicyofbettergenericstrategiesforusingresearchforinnovationandimpact,
keepingtheresearchatarms‐lengthfromtheoperationofprojectsseemswisefor
objectivityreasons.Thisdoesnot,however,detractfromtheobservationthatmore
systematiclearningwithinprojectteamscouldhelpdriveprojectiterationaroundthe
modesofinnovationmanagementdeployed.Thiscouldbeachievedbyformallyorganising
interventionssuchasactionresearchinitiativesoralternativelyitcouldalsobeachievedby
simplystrengtheningmonitoringandlearningfunctions.Thisisnotanewideaformanyof
theprojectteamsinAsiaasthishasbeenconsideredgoodpracticeindevelopment
programmesforsometime.OrganisationsinsomeoftheRIUprojects—theForestAction‐
ledone,forexample—haveindeedgoneonestepfurtherandactivelywrittenuplessons
fromtheirworkforwiderconsumption.Alogicalstepfurthermightbetoclusterthese
typesofinitiativesascommunitiesofpracticetostrengthentheselessonlearning
dimensions.
InasimilarveinwhenonetakesamorehistoricallookattheRIUprojectsandthewaythey
aremanaginginnovation,itisclearthatformanyofthemthisisnotasuddenshiftfrom
doingeitherdevelopmentorresearchprojects.Insteadwhatisapparentisthatthesetwo
distinctionshavebeenblurringinpracticeforquitesometime.Theexistenceofarangeof
sophisticatedstrategiestomanageinnovationmeansthatthishasnothappenedovernight,
andithasbeenapragmaticresponsetodealingwiththegoalsofthevariousorganisations
involved.Ifthisisthecasethendevelopmentplanningneedstorevisithowitgoesabout
providingsupporttoruraldevelopment.Themainthingthatstandsoutisthatintermediary
organisations—andtheseareoftencivilsocietyorganisationsadoptingenterprise‐like
principles—maynotnecessarilyhaveatechnicalstakeintheinnovationprocesstheyare
managing.Thisnotanentirelynewfinding:Forexample,Clarketal.(2003)describesthe
wayonesuchcivilsocietyorganisationsucceededasanintermediaryorganisation,
managinginnovationnotbecauseithadexpertiseinthetopic(packaginginthecase
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI43
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
discussed),butpreciselybecauseitdidnot;thereforeitwasunburdenedofpreconceived
approachesandideas.Thisisnottosaythatcivilsocietyorganisationshaveafreeholdon
actingasintermediaries.And,indeed,asthispaperhasshowedarangeoforganisational
typescanperforminnovationmanagementtasks.Therearestillempiricalquestionsabout
whether,undersomecircumstancesandforspecificobjectivessuchassocialequity,some
typesoforganisationsaremoresuitedtoperformingthistaskinruraldevelopmentdomains
thanothers.
Thisleadstoapreliminaryfindingaboutthenatureofinnovationmanagementthatseems
tohaveprofoundimplicationsforhowtheissueofputtingresearchintouseistackled.The
reviewoftheAsiaprojectsdoesnotonlyrevealthediversityofinnovationmanagement
tasksthatarebeingperformed,butitalsostressesthebundlingtogetherofthese.Of
course,theKlerkxandLeeuwistypologythatispresentedinanadaptedforminSection2
stressestheinterdependenceoftheseactivities.However,whatthisreviewofRIUprojects
highlightsisthatwhilefacilitatingaccesstotechnologyisimportantinputtingresearchinto
use,thisasoneofarangeofinnovationmanagementtasksonlyhasvaluewhenitis
bundledtogetherwithothersupportivetasks(accesstomarkets,conveningconsortia,etc).
ThisisillustratedinFigure4.Thishasaveryimportantimplicationforpolicy.Itmeansthat
puttingresearchintouserequiresprojects,organisationsand/orinitiativeswhosechief
characteristicisnotprimarilyasaconduittotechnologybutratherisoneofbeingableto
undertakeamuchwiderrangeofinnovationmanagementtasks.Thismirrorsfindingsabout
RIU’sbestprojectsinwhichnewtypesofenterprisesservicingeconomicandsocialgoalsare
performingtheserolesasapragmaticpartoftheirbusinessmodel(Halletal.,2010)
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI44
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Figure4.InnovationManagementTasks
INNOVATIONandIMPACT
Communicating
researchneeds
Brokering
Network
development
Advocacyfor
policyand
regulatory
changeFacilitatingaccesstoinput
andoutputmarkets
Negotiatingaccessto
credit/venturecapital
Mediatingconflict
resolution
Convening
innovation
platforms
Incubating
social
enterprises
Training
and
coaching
FacilitatingAccessto
technology
Organisingfarmers
intogroups
Ourexplorationofthesecaseshasalsorevealedanumberofotherobservationsthatwe
feelmeritrecordinghere.
Thefirstconcernsprojects‘dumbingdown’toaccessdonorfunds.Theoriginalproposition
oftheRIUprogramme—ofidentifyingresearchproductsthatcouldberolledoutright
away—seems,inretrospect,ludicrouslysimplisticwhencomparedtosophisticated
innovationmanagementstrategiesthatprojectsdeployed.Itishighlyquestionablewhether
anyoftheprojectsreallybelievedthatthiswasafinalpushtohaveimpact.Inrealitymany
seemhaverecognisedthattheyweresomewherealongthewayinalongtrajectoryof
learningaboutparticulardevelopmenttopicsandhowtotacklethem.
Theproblemstheyencounteredwerediverse:forestmanagement,thenatureofplant
breedingorAsiamarketingsystems.Whattheprojectteamsneededwasmorefundingto
movethemfurtheralongthattrajectory(somearealreadyintotheirpost‐RIUfunding).A
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI45
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
cynicmightsaythattheprojectssimplycomprisedgroupsofresearchersandNGOshopping
fromonesourceofdonorfundingtothenext.Thisprobablyneedstobebalancedbythe
recognitionthatthereisn’tanendpointforputtingresearchintouse,because,like
developmentitself,itisacontinuousprocessofadaptationandchange.Certainlythisraises
furtherquestionsabouthowthedevelopmentprocessshouldbefunded.
Thesecondpointisaboutasenseofhumilityinthebiggerschemeoftheinnovation
trajectories.ItisclearthatRIUshouldbethankfulthattheseprojectsdidpresent
themselvesforfundingbecausewhatthesegroupsofresearchersanddevelopment
practitionersbroughtwiththemwasahistorically‐derivedsetofexperienceandstrategies,
whichappeartobehighlyrelevanttotheinnovationtaskasitisnowunderstood.RIU’s
operationalcontributionwastopromotetheuseofpartnershipsasagenericprinciple.That
prescription(althoughsoundly‐based)cannotbeequatedwiththesophisticatedsetoftasks
andstrategiesthatweareseeingdeployed.Thisisaratherhumblingobservation.It
suggeststhatRIUexperimentsaremorelikebuyingatickettowatchashowthantheyare
aboutsettingupthebiggestshowintown.Thisisnotatrivialpointasitsuggeststhatpolicy
support(forexample,supportingRIU‐likeprogrammes)needstochangefundamentally.Itis
nolongeraboutcreatingtheseinnovationtrajectoriesbutlookingathowbesttosupport
suchon‐goingthreadsoflearning,entrepreneurship,innovationandchangeinrelevant
areas.ThisiswhereRIUhasbeenmoresuccessful,bylaterbringinginbusinessskillstohelp
projectswhenthishasemergedasaratelimitingstepofexpertise.But,astheprojects
themselvesdemonstrate,thereisaverywidesetofinnovationtasksneeded.Andwealso
seegaps:forexample,visioningandforesightexercises—equallyimportantformanaging
changeindynamicmarketsastheyareinthefaceofunpredictableclimatechange.The
researchofRIUneedstogetamuchbetterunderstandingofhowalltheseinnovation
supportactivitiescanbestbeorganisedandprovidedfor(whopays,whoprovides).
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI46
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
REFERENCES
Clark,N.G.,Hall,A.J.,RasheedSulaimanV.,GuruNaik(2003).“ResearchasCapacity
Building:TheCaseofanNGO‐FacilitatedPost‐HarvestInnovationSystemforthe
HimalayanHills”.WorldDevelopmentVol.31,No.11,pp.1845‐1863.
Engel,P.andSalomon,M.(2003).FacilitatingInnovationforDevelopment:ARAAKS
ResourceBox.KoninklijkInstituutvoordeTropen(KIT):Amsterdam.
Hall,A.(2009).“EmbeddingResearchinSociety:DevelopmentAssistanceOptionsfor
SupportingAgriculturalInnovationinaGlobalKnowledgeEconomy”.International
JournalofTechnologyManagementandSustainableDevelopment.Vol8,Issue3,pp.
221‐236.
Hall,A.J.(2005).“CapacityDevelopmentforAgriculturalBiotechnologyinDeveloping
Countries:AnInnovationSystemsViewofWhatItIsandHowtoDevelopIt”.Journal
ofInternationalDevelopment,Vol.17,No.5,pp611‐630.
Hall,A.,Dijkman,J.andSulaiman,R.V.(2010).“ResearchIntoUse:Investigatingthe
RelationshipbetweenAgriculturalResearchandInnovation”.RIUDiscussionPaper
Series#2010‐01,July2010,ResearchIntoUse:UK.
Hall,AandN.Clark(2010).“WhatdoComplexAdaptiveSystemsLookLikeandwhatarethe
ImplicationsforInnovationPolicy?”JournalofInternationalDevelopment.Vol.22,
Issue3,pp.308‐324.
Hall,A.J.andN.Clark(1995).“CopingwithChange,ComplexityandDiversityinAgriculture:
ThecaseofRhizobiumInoculantsinThailand”.WorldDevelopment,Vol.23.,No.9,
pp.1601‐1614.
Howells,J.(2006).Intermediationandtheroleofintermediariesininnovation.Research
Policy,35,715‐728.
EkinKeskin,MirjamSteglich,JeroenDijkman&AndyHall(2008)."PrivateCapacityand
PublicFailure:ContoursofLivestockInnovationResponseCapacityinKenya."UNU‐
MERITWorkingPaperSeries#2008‐068,UnitedNationsUniversity‐Maastricht
EconomicandsocialResearchandtrainingcentreonInnovationandTechnology:
Maastricht,TheNetherlands.
Klerkx,L.,&Leeuwis,C.(2009).Establishmentandembeddingofinnovationbrokersat
differentinnovationsystemlevels:InsightsfromtheDutchagriculturalsector.
TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,76(6)849‐860.
Klerkx,L.andLeeuwis,C.(2008).“MatchingDemandandSupplyintheAgricultural
KnowledgeInfrastructure:ExperiencewithInnovationIntermediaries”,FoodPolicy,
33[3],260‐276.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI47
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Kristjanson,P.,Reid,R.S.,Dickson,N.,Clark,W.C.,Romney,D.,Puskur,R.,etal.(2009).
Linkinginternationalagriculturalresearchknowledgewithactionforsustainable
development.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences,inpress.
Leeuwis,C.andHall,A.(2010).“FacingtheChallengesofClimateChangeandFoodSecurity:
TheRoleofResearch,ExtensionandCommunicationInstitutions.Report
CommissionedbytheResearchandExtensionBranchoftheUnitedNationsFood
andAgricultureOrganization,October2010,FAO:Rome.
Reddy,Vamsidhar,T.S(2010).ScalingUptheDecentralisedSeedProduction(DSP)
ApproachinBangladesh.DraftReportforRIU.
VamsidharReddy,T.S.,AndyHallandRasheedSulaiman,V.(2010).“NewOrganisationaland
InstitutionalVehiclesforManagingInnovationinSouthAsia:OpportunitiesforUsing
ResearchforTechnicalChangeandSocialGain”.RIUDiscussionPaperSeries#2010‐
07,October2010,ResearchIntoUse:UK.
Richards,P.(1989).Agricultureasaperformance.InR.Chambers,A.PaceyandL.Thrupp
(Eds.),FarmerFirst:FarmerInnovationandAgriculturalResearch.London:
IntermediateTechnology,pp.39‐42.
Rivera,WilliamM.andRasheedSulaimanV.(2009).“Extension:ObjectofReform,Engine
forInnovation”,OutlookonAgriculture,Vol.38,No.3,pp.267‐273,September2009.
C.ShambuPrasad(2005).ScienceandTechnologyinCivilSociety:InnovationTrajectoryof
SpirulinaAlgalTechnology.EconomicandPoliticalWeekly,October1,2005,pp.
4363‐4372.
Ugbe,UtiangP.(2010).“WhatDoesInnovationSmellLike?AConceptualFrameworkfor
AnalysingandEvaluatingDFID‐RIUExperimentsinBrokeringAgriculturalInnovation
andDevelopment”.RIUDiscussionPaperSeries#2010‐10,November2010,Research
IntoUse:UK.
WorldBank(2006).EnhancingAgriculturalInnovation:HowtogobeyondtheStrengthening
ofResearchSystems.EconomicSectorWorkReport.TheWorldBank:Washington,
DC,pp.149.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI48
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
APPENDIX 1: THE SOUTH ASIA PROJECT PORTFOLIO
ThefollowingprovidesabriefdescriptionoftheSouthAsiaprojects:
Cluster1:ParticipatoryCropImprovementinAsia
(i)ImprovingLivelihoodsinSouthAsiathroughSustainedAccesstoNewTechnologiesin
RainfedAgriculture(India)
Thisinitiative,ledbytheCentreforAridZoneStudies(CAZS),Bangor,UK,focuseson
promotingtheuptakeofuplandvarietiesdevelopedthroughParticipatoryCrop
ImprovementinCentralandEasternIndia.ItpartnerswithtwoNGOs—namely,Gramin
VikasTrust(GVT)andCatholicReliefServices(CRS)—todisseminatetheseseedswidely.It
focusesonstrengtheningthecapacityofseedproducergroups,withthemainmechanism
deployedbeingthegraincashseedbank.Theinitiativeisnowplanningtosetupaproducer
companytocommerciallyproduceandmarketqualityseedevolvedthroughParticipatory
CropImprovement.
(ii)PovertyReductionthroughCropIntensificationintoRiceFallowsinNepal
ThisinitiativeledbytheForumforRuralWelfareandAgriculturalReformforDevelopment
(Forward)—anNGOinNepal—focusesonpromotingriceandlegumeseedsdeveloped
throughParticipatoryCropImprovementbystrengtheningthecapacityofcommunity‐based
seedproducergroupstoproducetheseseedsandthendisseminatingtheseseedsassmall
kits.Inthisproject,itpartnerswithanotherNGO—LocalInitiativesforBiodiversity
ResearchandDevelopment(Li‐Bird)—andCAZS,Bangor.Forwardhasnowsetupaseed
companycalledGlobalAgritechNepalPrivateLimited(GATE)toproduceandmarketthese
seeds.
(iii)NewRiceandLegumeseedfromClient‐OrientedBreeding(Nepal)
TheNGOLi‐BirdleadsthisinitiativeincollaborationwithForwardandCAZS.Italsohas
similarobjectives,suchasstrengtheningcommunity‐basedseedproducersandachieving
thewiderdisseminationofseedsdevelopedthroughParticipatoryCropImprovementas
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI49
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
seedkits.Li‐Birdhasalsoestablishedaseedcompany,calledtheAnmolbiuSeedCompany
PrivateLimited,toproduceandmarketqualityseedsofriceandothercropsproduced.
Cluster2:ValueChainInnovation
(i)LinkingFarmerswithMarketsforRuralProsperity
Thisinitiative,ledbyInternationalDevelopmentEnterprises(IDE)inNepal,Vietnamand
Cambodia,isaboutbuildingandstrengtheninglinkagesandpartnershipsamongmarket
chainactorsthroughthepromotionoftheParticipatoryMarketChainApproach(PMCA)12.
InNepaltheprojectisfocusingonbuildingthecapacityofmarketplanningcommitteesand
developingtrustamongvariousactorsintheexistingvaluechain,includingthe
managementofcollectioncentres,farmersandtraders.
(ii)CoalitiontoDiversityIncomethroughUnder‐UtilisedCrops
TheInternationalCentreforUnderutilisedCrops(ICUC)ispilotingthismulti‐pronged
approachinIndiaandVietnamtopromoteunderusedcropsbysupportingcommunity
servicesforproduction,post‐harvestandmarketingofunderusedcropsandimproving
accesstothemarketfortheruralpoor.InIndiaitispartneringwiththeNGOBharatiyaAgro
IndustriesFoundation(BAIF)andinVietnamwiththeCentreforAgrarianSystemsResearch
andDevelopment(CASRAD)andtheFruitandVegetablesResearchInstitute(FAVRI),two
nationalresearchcentres.
(iii)DevelopingFishSeedValueChaininBangladesh
Thisinitiative,ledbytheNGORangpurDinajpurRuralServices(RDRS)inBangladesh,is
aboutdevelopingafishseedvaluechain(broodfishproducers,fingerlingtradersandtable
fishgrowers)bycreatingaroleforsmall‐holdersasintermediaryproducersandthereby
enhancingtheavailabilityandqualityoffishseed.WorldFishCenterandInternational
DevelopmentEnterprisesarepartnersinthisinitiative.
12 ThePMCAisaresearchanddevelopmentapproachforfosteringpro‐poor,market‐ledinnovationincommoditychains,
throughactiveparticipationofprivateandpublicmarketchainactors.CIP'sPapaAndinaInitiative
(http://papandina.cip.cgiar.org)andpartnersbegantodevelopPMCAin2001asameanstoreduceruralpovertyinthe
Andesbylinkingsmallfarmerstonewmarketopportunities.ThePMCAbuiltonthe"RapidAppraisalofAgricultural
KnowledgeSystems"(RAAKS)whichstimulatesnetworkingforinnovation(EngelandSalomon,2003).
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI50
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Cluster3:InnovationinNaturalResourceManagement
(i)ReducingPovertythroughInnovationSystemsinForestry
Thisinitiative,ledbyForestAction—apolicythinktankNGOinNepal—focuseson
promotinginnovationsininternalgroupgovernance(visioning,hamlet‐basedplanning,
decision‐makingandself‐monitoring)amongcommunityforestusergroupsandintroducing
activeforestmanagementandsustainableharvestingtechnologies,includingenterprise
development.Toimplementthisinitiative,itpartnerswithFECOFUN(Federationof
CommunityForestUsers,Nepal),NEHHPA(NepalHerbsandHerbalProductsAssociation)
andtheNepalForumofEnvironmentalJournalists(NEEFJ).
(ii)ScalingupIFMthroughAdaptiveLearningNetworks
TheBangladeshEnvironmentalLawyersAssociation(BELA)isleadingthisinitiativein
collaborationwiththeFloodHazardResearchCentre(MiddlesexUniversity,UK).Itfocuses
onpromotinginnovationsinmanagingfloodplainsinBangladesh.Thisapproach,called
IntegratedFloodplainManagement(IFM),involvesparticipatoryactionplandevelopment,
adaptivelearningamongstakeholders,developmentandcomplianceofrightsand
developingalegalframeworkforcommunity‐basedmanagementoffloodplainresources
andresourcemanagementforfisheriesandcropproduction.
Others
(i)PromotingSustainableLivelihoodDevelopment(RojiRoti)
Thisprojectattemptstoreachtheultra‐poorinNorthernandEasternIndiathroughforming
groupsofpoorwomenandestablishingasustainableruralsupportdeliverysystemto
supportthepoorintheireffortstoimprovetheirlivelihoods.Thisapproach,calledthe
‘dialecticapproach’bytheprojectteam,reliesongroupsavingasastartingpoint,whichis
thenfollowedbyaccesstomicrofinanceandlinkstoinputs,technicalexpertiseand
insurance.ThisprojectisledbyGYAssociatedLtd.(GYA),aUK‐basedconsultingcompany,in
collaborationwithaBihar‐basedNGOCPSL(CentreforPromotingSustainableLivelihoods),
andtheICAR(IndianCouncilforAgriculturalResearch)researchcentreinPatna,India.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI51
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
(ii)RatManagementforRuralCommunities
ThisisaninitiativethatusesatransferoftechnologyapproachtocontrolratsinBangladesh.
Itinvolvestrainingruralcommunitiesandimplementingagencies—mainlyNGOsandother
extensionagents—oncommunity‐focusedandEcologically‐BasedRodentManagement
(EBRM),allthewhileproducinganddistributingimprovedrattraps.Theinitiativeisledby
AID‐Comilla,anNGOinBangladesh,incollaborationwiththeBangladeshAgricultural
ResearchInstitute(BARI),theBangladeshDepartmentofAgriculturalExtension(DAE)and
theBangladeshNaturalResourcesInstitute.
(iii)ProSCABorPromotingSustainableCoastalAquacultureinBangladesh
Thisisaninitiativefordisseminationof5coastalfisheriestechnologies(crabfattening,
molluscsculture,seaweedculture,improvedfishicingandproductionofpesticide‐freedry
fish)throughtrainingandenterprisepromotion.ThisinitiativeisledbytheBangladesh
FisheriesResearchForum(BFRF),aprofessionalallianceofresearchersandpractitioners
involvedinresearch,developmentandcommercialisationofthefisheriessectorin
Bangladesh.Themaintasksinvolvedinthisinitiativeare:training,enterprisepromotionand
establishinglinkstoinputandoutputmarkets.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI52
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
THERIUDISCUSSIONPAPERSERIES
(Availablefordownloadatwww.researchintouse.com)
2010‐01ResearchIntoUse:InvestigatingtheRelationshipBetweenAgricultural
ResearchandInnovation
ByAndyHall,JeroenDijkmanandRasheedSulaimanV.
2010‐02Bottom‐up,Bottom‐line:Development‐RelevantEnterprisesinEastAfricaand
theirSignificanceforAgriculturalInnovation
ByAndyHall,NormanClarkandAndyFrost
2010‐03InnovationSystems,EconomicSystems,ComplexityandDevelopmentPolicy
ByNormanClark
2010‐04PuttingResearchIntoUse:AMarketFailureApproach
ByNormanClarkandIanMaudlin
2010‐05ItMayTakeALittleWhile..:InsightsonAgriculturalResearchforInnovation
andDevelopmentinNigeria
ByUtiangP.Ugbe
2010‐06GenderandAgriculturalInnovation:RevisitingtheDebateThroughan
InnovationSystemsPerspective
ByAnnKingiri
2010‐07NewOrganisationalandInstitutionalVehiclesforManagingInnovationin
SouthAsia:OpportunitiesforUsingResearchforTechnicalChangeandSocial
Gain
ByT.S.VamsidharReddy,AndyHallandRasheedSulaimanV.
2010‐08TheInnovationTrajectoryofSleepingSicknessControlinUganda:Research
KnowledgeinitsContext
ByJohnMorton
2010‐09AfricaMatters:EmergingLessonsfromtheRIUCountryProgrammes
ByJeroenDijkman
2010‐10WhatDoesInnovationSmellLike?AConceptualFrameworkforAnalysingand
EvaluatingDFID‐RIUExperimentsinBrokeringAgriculturalInnovationand
Development
ByUtiangP.Ugbe
2010‐11StudyingRuralInnovationManagement:AFrameworkandEarlyFindings
fromRIUinSouthAsia
ByRasheedSulaimanV.,AndyHall,VamsidharReddyT.S.andKumudaDorai
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI53