ArticlePDF Available

Studying Rural innovation management: A framework and early findings from RIU in South Asia

Authors:
2010 Discussion Paper 11
STUDYING RURAL INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A FRAMEWORK
AND EARLY FINDINGS FROM RIU IN SOUTH ASIA
RASHEED SULAIMAN V., ANDY HALL, VAMSIDHAR REDDY, T.S. AND KUMUDA
DORAI
DECEMBER 2010
DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This document is an output from the Research Into Use Programme (RIU) funded by
the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of
developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID.
ThisworkislicensedundertheCreativeCommonsAttribution3.0UnportedLicense.Toviewacopyofthislicense,visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/orsendalettertoCreativeCommons,171SecondStreet,Suite300,San
Francisco,California,94105,USA
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI2
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
STUDYING RURAL INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A FRAMEWORK
AND EARLY FINDINGS FROM RIU IN SOUTH ASIA
RasheedSulaimanV.1,AndyHall2VamsidharReddy,T.S.3andKumudaDorai4
Abstract
ThispaperaimstomaptheexperienceoftheRIUAsiaprojectsanddrawoutthemain
innovationmanagementtacticsbeingobservedwhilelayingthegroundworkforfurther
researchonthistopic.Itprovidesaframeworktohelpanalysethesortsofinnovation
managementtasksthatarebecomingimportant.Thisframeworkdistinguishesfour
elementsofinnovationmanagement:(i)Functions(ii)Actions(iii)Toolsand(iv)
OrganisationalFormat.Thepaper’sreviewofthedistributionofinnovationmanagementin
theAsiaprojectssuggeststhatitisnottechnologyaccessrelatedtasksalonethatare
important,butthebundlingofthesewithotheractivities,whichincludethedevelopmentof
networks,advocacyforpolicychange,trainingandothernegotiatedchangesinpracticeand
action.Theimplicationforpolicyisthatwaysofsupportingthiswidersuiteofinnovation
managementtaskswouldgoalongwayinhelpingmakebetteruseofagriculturalresearch
inruraldevelopment.
Keywords:InnovationManagement,AgriculturalResearch,Innovation,Development,
Policy,ValueChainDevelopment,SouthAsia,InnovationTrajectory,Functions,Actions,
Tools,OrganisationalFormat
JELCodes:L26,L31,L33,N5,N55,O13,O19,O21,O22,O31,O32,O33,O53,Q13,Q16
RIUDISCUSSIONPAPERSERIES
1 HeadofAsiaResearch,RIUCRT,rasheed@innovationstudies.org
2 HeadoftheRIUCentralResearchTeam(CRT),andy.hall@innovationstudies.org
3 ResearchFellow,RIU,vamsidhar.reddy@innovationstudies.org
4 Researcher,LINK,kumuda.dorai@innovationstudies.org
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI3
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LISTOFACRONYMS5

1.INTRODUCTION8
2.MULTILEVELUNPREDICTABILITY:THECHALLENGESOF
INNOVATIONMANAGEMENT10
FIGURE1:THEEXPANDEDDOMAINOFINNOVATIONSERVICESINADYNAMIC,
GLOBALENVIRONMENT14
3.THERIUPROGRAMMEINASIAANDITSINNOVATIONMANAGEMENT
HYPOTHESIS18
FIGURE2:INNOVATIONTRAJECTORYFORAPPLICATIONOFDSP
THROUGHRIU19
FIGURE3:DIFFERENTSTAGESOFSTAKEHOLDERARCHITECTUREIN
PROMOTIONOFDSP24
TABLE1:HYPOTHESISANDPROCESSINSIGHTS(INNOVATIONMANAGEMENT
RESEARCHQUESTIONSASSOCIATEDWITHRIUPROJECTSINSOUTHASIA26
4.WHATDOESINNOVATIONMANAGEMENTREALLYINVOLVE? 30
TABLE2:INNOVATIONMANAGEMENTFEATURESINRIUSOUTHASIA
PROJECTS36
5.DISCUSSION:TOWARDSANUNDERSTANDINGOFHOWTOMANAGE
INNOVATIONINORDERTOPUTRESEARCHINTOUSEINSOUTHASIA42
FIGURE4:INNOVATIONMANAGEMENTTASKS45
REFERENCES47
APPENDIX1:THERIUSOUTHASIAPROJECTPORTFOLIO  49
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI4
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ACMVD ‐Africancassavamosaicvirusdisease
ADB‐AsianDevelopmentBank
AFP‐AdivasiFisheriesProject
AIT‐AsianInstituteofTechnology
AKVAFORSK ‐InstituteofAquacultureResearchinNorway
BAIF‐BharatiyaAgroIndustriesFoundation
BARI‐BangladeshAgriculturalResearchInstitute
BELA‐BangladeshEnvironmentLawyersAssociation
BFRF‐BangladeshFisheriesResearchForum
BFRI‐BangladeshFisheriesResearchInstitute
CARE‐CooperativeAmericanReliefforEverywhere
CASRAD ‐CentreforAgrarianSystemsResearchandDevelopment,
Vietnam
CAZS‐CentreforAridZoneStudies,Bangor,UnitedKingdom
CBOs‐CommunityBasedOrganisations
CBSPs‐CommunityBasedSeedProducers
CFUGs‐CommunityForestUserGroups
CGIAR‐ConsultativeGrouponInternationalAgriculturalResearch
CIP‐CentroInternacionaldelaPapa(InternationalPotato
Centre)
COB‐ClientOrientatedBreeding
CPHP‐DFID’sCropPostHarvestProgramme
CPSL‐CentreforPromotingSustainableLivelihoods,India
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI5
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
CRS‐CatholicReliefServices
CRT‐CentralResearchTeam,RIU
DAE‐Bangladesh’sDepartmentofAgriculturalExtension
DASP‐DecentralizationofSustainableAquacultureProject
DFID‐DepartmentforInternationalDevelopment,UK
DoF‐DepartmentofFisheries,Bangladesh
DSP‐DecentralisedSeedProduction
EBRM‐EcologicallyBasedRodentManagement
FAO‐TheUnitedNationsFoodandAgricultureOrganization
FAVRI‐FruitandVegetablesResearchInstitute,Vietnam
FECOFUN ‐FederationofCommunityForestUsers,Nepal
FORWARD ‐ForumforRuralWelfareandAgriculturalReformfor
Development
GATE‐GlobalAgritechNepalPrivateLimited
GFRAS‐GlobalForumforRuralAdvisoryServices
GIFT‐GeneticallyImprovedFarmedTilapia
GVT‐GraminVikasTrust
GYA‐GYAssociatedLtd.
ICAR‐IndianCouncilforAgriculturalResearch
ICF‐InnovationChallengeFund
ICLARM ‐InternationalCenterforLivingAquaticResourcesManagement
(RenamedastheWorldFishCenter)
ICUC‐InternationalCentreforUnderutilisedCrops
IDE‐InternationalDevelopmentEnterprises
IPM‐IntegratedPestManagement
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI6
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
LIBIRD‐LocalInitiativesforBiodiversityResearchand
Development
LINK‐LearningINnovationKnowledge
NEEFJ‐NepalForumofEnvironmentalJournalists
NEHHPA ‐NepalHerbsandHerbalProductsAssociation
NFEP‐NorthwestFisheriesExtensionProject,Bangladesh
NGOs‐NonGovernmentalOrganisations
NRM‐NaturalResourceManagement
ODA‐OverseasDevelopmentAdministration(RenamedDFID)
PCI‐ParticipatoryCropImprovement
PMCA‐ParticipatoryMarketChainApproach
ProSCAB ‐PromotingSustainableCoastalAquacultureinBangladesh
R&D‐ResearchandDevelopment
RAAKS‐RapidAppraisalofAgriculturalKnowledgeSystems
RDRS‐RangpurDinajpurRuralService
RIU‐ResearchIntoUse
RNRRS‐RenewableNaturalResourcesResearchStrategy
S&T‐ScienceandTechnology
SHGs‐SelfHelpGroups
SWRM‐SocietyforWaterResourcesManagement
UK‐UnitedKingdom
UN‐UnitedNations
USA‐UnitedStatesofAmerica
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI7
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
1. INTRODUCTION
TheResearchintoUseprogramme(RIU),supportedbytheUK’sDepartmentfor
InternationalDevelopment(DFID),isamajordepartureinagriculturalresearchand
developmentpractice.Perhapsforthefirsttime,amajorinternationalsponsorof
agriculturalresearchhasestablishedasubstantiallearningorientatedprogrammethat
specificallyseekstounderstandhowresearchcanbestbeusedforimpact.Conceptual,
empiricalandpolicydebatesonthistopicareveryclearonhowthisquestionshouldbe
framed:namely,thatitisanissueofunderstandinghowtheprocessofinnovationcanbest
bemanagedandhowresearchcanbestbeorganisedsothatitisintegratedintothe
innovationprocesstoachievesocialandeconomicaspirations(forareviewofthis
perspectiveseeHalletal.,2010).
Whilethequestionisclear,findingwaystoexplorethisquestionempiricallyandina
systematicwayarefarfromeasy.Waysoforganisingandmanaginginnovationareusually
shapedbythecontextsinwhichtheyemerge(whicharethemselvesconstantlychangingin
unpredictableways),sotheideaofintroducingexperimental“treatments”becomeshighly
problematic.Tomakethesamepointdifferently,waysoforganisinginnovationarenot
clinical,neatapplicationsofstandardapproaches.Insteadthesearethemessyprocesses
thatariseasaconsequenceofpathdependent,historicallydeterminedsituationsthatplay
outovertime,wherethoseinvolvedhavemadethebestofwhattheworldhasthrownat
themforbetterorworse.Thedefiningfeaturehereisthatoflocalstylesofmanaging
innovationinthefaceofaneverchangingcontext.Inpracticethismeansthattheapproach
deployedisconstantlychanginganddeveloping.Thesameapproachmaynotwork
anywhereelseanditmaynotbefitforpurposewhenthenextsetofunpredictableevents
arises,butitisthestartingpoint.Thebestthatpolicycandoistolookforpromisinggeneric
tacticsandtosupportadaptivebehaviour(HallandClark,2010).
RIUhasstruggledwiththeseissueswhenestablishingitsexperimentsbecause,inmany
senses,theprogrammehasdefineditselfbytheapproachtoinnovationmanagementithas
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI8
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
advocatedandpromotedinitsprojects:initiallyaninnovationsystems“approach”
(althoughitwasneverentirelyclearwhatsuchanapproachmightentail)andlateraprivate
enterpriseledapproach(alsosimilarlyfluidindefinition).Theseapproachcaricaturesthen
becameafilterforselectingprojectsandmonitoringtheirperformance.Thispaper,
however,arguesthatifprogrammessuchasthisaretolearnhowtomanageinnovationfor
puttingresearchintouseforimpact,thekeyexperimentaldesignissueconcernscreating
theconditionsinwhichonecanobservedifferentcontextuallyrelevantwaysofmanaging
innovationandthenlearninghowtheprincipalprotagonistsintheprocessadapttheir
strategiesinthefaceofunpredictedeventsandcircumstances.Throughamixtureofgood
luckandgooddesignRIUhasendedupwithaportfolioofprojectswhich,asthispaperwill
show,demonstratesenormousrichnessofinnovationmanagingexperience.Whatthen
supersedesthe“approach”/treatmentasthekeyanalyticaldevicefortheexperimentisthe
frameworkthatisusedtodrawlessons.
Thispaperdevelopssuchaframework,usesittomapsomeoftheexperiencesintheRIU
projectsinAsiaanddrawsoutthemaininnovationmanagementtacticsbeingobserved.
Theframeworkdistinguishesfourelementsofinnovationmanagement:(i)Functions(ii)
Actions(iii)Toolsand(iv)OrganisationalFormat.Thepaperbuildsuponandfurtherclarifies
theresearchdesignofRIUthatispresentedbyHalletal.(2010).Thatdesignmadeuseof
stylisedinnovationnarratives;thatistosaystylisedbroadapproachestoinnovation
(participation;publicprivatesectorpartners,etc.).Theframeworkpresentedinthispaper
seekstoexamineinmuchgreaterdetailtheinnovationmanagementtasksbeingusedand
thebundlingoftheseindifferentcontexts.Thishelpsmoveawayfromtheemphasison
stylisedgenericapproachesimpliedbytheinnovationnarratives,whichobscuretheeclectic
natureofinnovationmanagement.Thepaper,therefore,alsosetsthesceneforfurther
investigationusingthisframeworkofinnovationmanagementinRIUanditsroleinputting
researchintouse.
Thepaperbeginswithadiscussionofthenotionofadaptationasthisseemstobeacentral
driverofinnovationanditis,therefore,throughthislensthatthetaskofinnovation
managementneedstobeunderstood.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI9
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
2. MULTI-LEVEL UNPREDICTABLITY: THE CHALLENGES OF
INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
Thediscussionsonalternativeparadigmsofagriculturalresearchareasoldasits
deploymentfordevelopmentalpurposes.ReviewsofthesedebatescanbeseeninWorld
Bank,2006;Halletal.,2010andmanyotherplaces,sothesewillnotbepresentedhere.
Notableinthesedebatesistheprominenceofaninnovationsystemperspective.Theorigins
andinterpretationofthisperspectivehavebeendiscussedadnauseaminrecentyears.
Despitethesescholarlyeffortsitisstillnotentirelyclearwhethersuchextensivemusings
haveimpingedinanywayonthecommonnarrativeusedtoplanandevaluateagricultural
researchandinnovationefforts.Ratherthanattempttomakeyetmoreconceptual
contributionsonthistopicwewishtohighlightoneparticularelementofthesedebates,
whichseemstohaverelevancetoourexplorationofinnovationmanagementforputting
researchintouse.Thetopicisthenotionof‘adaptation’.

Inmanysensesagriculturaldevelopmenthasalwaysbeenanissueofadaptation.Inpart
thishasbeentheunderpinningoftheattemptstoupgradeagriculturalsystemsbyadapting
themwithnewtechnology,agronomicandanimalhusbandrypractices.However,
adaptationhasamuchlongerhistoryandmorefundamentalroleinagriculture.Paul
Richards(1989)sumsthisupverynicelywhenhetalksofagricultureasaperformance.By
thishemeansthatthetaskoffarmingisnotaroutineonethatisrepeatedyearafteryear,
butratheritisaoneoffannualshowwhereeachyearconditionsaredifferent(weather,
prices,familycrisisandfortunes,theWorldCup,war,cropandanimaldiseaseoutbreaks,
globalmarketandpoliticalconditions,etc.)andfarmershavetomuddlethroughandmake
thebestoutofit.
HallandClark(1995and2010)documentthismuddlingthroughprocesswithcasesfrom
AsiaandAfrica.Theydrawoncomplexsystemsthinkingtodescribetheevolutionary
dynamicoffarmingsystems.Intheir2010papertheydescribetheconsequencesofaplant
diseaseoutbreakinUgandaandpointoutthepathdependentsetofadaptationsthattook
placeincroppingpatterns,foodconsumptionpractices,economicactivitiesandsocial
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI10
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
relationseachofwhichoperatedasaninterlinkedsubsystem.Theanalysisidentifiesthe
farmeratthecentreofanevolutionarymechanismusedtocopewithchangeandgives
primacytothecapacitytorespondtochangingcircumstancesthroughadaptationand
innovation.
LikeRichardsbeforethem,HallandClark(2010)explainthathouseholdsandrural
entrepreneursmakethebestoftheseshocksthroughadaptation,buttheseadaptive
capacitieshavetheirlimits.Theselimitsrelatemainlytothedisconnectbetweenthese
farmleveladaptivecapacitiesandprocessesandthehugearrayoftechnological,financial,
entrepreneurialandpolicyresourcesthatarereadilyavailableinsocietyatlargeandwhich,
ifproperlychannelledandlinked,couldbuildapowerfulcollectivecapacityforadaptation,
innovationandchange.Alas,thisbroadbasednotionofcapacitybuildingisrarely
understoodinpolicycircles.Thegreatestironyofallisthatthisnotionofcapacitybuildingis
thesinglemostimportantmessagethattheubiquitousinnovationsystemsconceptprovides
andwhichthesesamepolicymakersnowmakesomuchof.Yet,westillseenational
governmentanddevelopmentinvestorsplanningandimplementingruraldevelopment
programmes(whichhaveastrongcapacitybuildingagendasocialorganisations,
microfinanceandmicroenterprisedevelopment)entirelyseparatelyfromagriculturaland
otherformsofresearchandlearning.Inotherwords,despitegrandinnovationsystems
rhetoric,science,technologyandinnovationarenotactuallyconsideredworthintegrating
withruralcapacitybuildingefforts.Asaresultresearchcontinuestochurnoutfindings
whilesponsorsofthisresearchremainpuzzledbyhowthiscanbeputintouse.
Thereareanumberofpointsworthamplifyinghere.Thefirstisaboutcomplexityandthe
natureofsystemsthatexhibitthischaracteristic.Again,thisisatopicofdebaterifewith
seductivetrapsforconceptualmusing.Butkeytoourdiscussionhereisthewaythe
interactionsofmanyelementsofasystemproduceunexpectedandunpredictable
outcomes;HallandClark(2010)explainhowacassavadiseaseoutbreakinUgandaledtoa
differentroleforwomeninagriculturalproduction.Keskinetal.(2008)explainhowthe
developmentofthetouristindustryinEastAfricaledtoasuccessfulmeatprocessing
industryinKenya.ShambuPrasad(2005)describesthewayasoilfertilitytreatment
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI11
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
(spirulina)endedasafoodsupplement,promptedbytheneedsofearthquakerelief
programmes.
Ideasaboutcomplexityalsosuggestthatasthenumberofelementsinasystemincreases
thepaceandunpredictabilityofchangeincreasesaswellandthisishappeningwhere
ruraleconomiesarebecomingmoreintertwinedwithnational,regionalandglobal
economicsystems(seeHall,2009).Inaworlddrivenbycomplexity,developmentsuccess
(beitinsocialoreconomicterms)isnotaresult,therefore,ofmasteryofaparticular
productiontechniqueorevenofknowledgebasedcapacitiessuchasresearch.Rather,ina
worlddrivenbycomplexitysuccessisdeterminedbythecapacitytoadapt.Andbecausethis
involvesreworkingideas,resourcesandrelationsandlinks,adaptivecapacityissynonymous
withinnovationcapacityandthisisneedstobeviewedasacollectivemultidimensional
entity.Itincludesfarmlevelprocessesanditincludespolicyandinstitutionalenvironments.
Itincludesskillsanditincludesnetworkslinkingthesetogether.Butthecriticaltakehome
messageforourdiscussionisthatthiscapacitycannotbeconsideredintermsofits
componentparts.Capacityistheemergentpropertyofthesystemasawhole.
Thenextpointworthhighlightingisthatofpathdependency.Atitsverysimplestthismeans
thatthestartingconditionsofanyendeavourtendtoshapehowitproceeds.Thesame
appliestoinnovationandthenatureoftheconsequenttrajectorythatthisfollowsover
time.Bythesameargument,suchtrajectoriescannotreallybeunderstoodwithout
understandingtheirhistoricalemergence.TaketheCGIAR,forexample;whyisitlikeitisstill
(largely)acommodityfocusedresearchinitiativeinpursuitoftechnologicalsilverbullets?
Agriculturalextensionisanothercaseinpoint;whyisitstillfocusedonanarrowinnovation
supporttasksuchastechnologytransfer?Theanswerliesintheirhistories.Thebroader
pointforourdiscussionhereisthatthisadaptivecapacitydiscussedaboveisalwaysgoing
tolookquitedifferentdependingonstartingconditions.So,insomeinstances,innovation
managementservices,suchasagriculturalextension,areprovidedbythepublicsector.But
incountrieswithadifferenthistoricaldevelopment,themarketorcivilsocietymaybethe
wayofprovidingsuchservices.Collectiveactionmayberoutineinsomecountries,but
almostimpossibletoorganiseinothers,sodifferentwaysofmanagingtheinnovation
processwillhavegrownupinthesedifferentsettings.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI12
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Thefinalpointworthamplifyingbringsusbacktotheroleofpolicyinanerademanding
adaptivecapacities.Whereasinthepastpolicywasseenasawayoforchestratingsocially
usefulinnovationtrajectoriesthroughprojectsandprogramme,HallandClark(2010)
suggestthattheroleofpolicywillbetoidentifyemergingnascentcapacitiesand
trajectoriesandsupportthem(seealsoHalletal.,2010).Thispresentssomeconsiderable
challengesforpublicpolicy.Forexample,whatmighttheroleofagriculturalextensionbein
thissortofsituation?FortheResearchIntoUseprogrammethisisactuallythekeyquestion
anditisatopiconwhichthereisnowconsiderabledebate.
Extension,asalreadyalludedtoabove,hasgotstuckasanagencyfortechnologytransfer
(RiveraandSulaiman,2009).Therecentinternationalclamouraroundtheestablishmentof
aGlobalForumforRuralAdvisoryServices(GFRAS)doesnotseemtohavebeen
accompaniedbyareconceptualisationofthismodeofinnovationsupportservices.Aswe
haveseentheadaptationtaskthatfarmersfacehasalwaysinvolvedmuchmorethan
technologicaladaptation.Asthecontextofagriculturebecomeevermoreintegratedwith
globalscalephenomena(climatechange,financial,tradeandregulatoryregimes,etc.)and
conditionsbecomeevermoreunpredictableanddynamic,adaptationassumesamuch
greaterimportanceandatascalethatincludesbutgoeswaybeyondfarmlevelagronomic
practice.
LeeuwisandHall(2010)haverecentlyexploredwhatthecontemporaryadaptationagenda
mightmeanforinnovationsupportservicesthesearetheservicesneededtomanage
innovationwhenthisisunderstoodtotakeplaceinsystemsornetworksofdifferent
organisationsandchangingcontexts.Theyusetheexampleofclimatechangeasadriverof
adaptation,butarguethatthisisametaphorforarangeofopportunitiesandchallenges
beingfacedinthecontemporaryagriculturaldevelopmentscenario.Thecoreoftheir
argumentisthatinnovationisaprocessinvolvingarangeoftasks.Thesetaskstakeplacein
threedomains5:(i)TechnicalApplication(farming,agroprocessing,marketing)(ii)
OrganisationsInvolvedinSupportingApplication(research,finance,advisoryservices,input
5 Ugbe(2010)discussessimilardomainsinthecontextofimpactassessment.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI13
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
supply,marketplayersandcompanies)and(iii)ThePolicyDomain(legislation,regulation,
routinepractices).ThisisillustratedinFigure1below.
Figure1:TheExpandedDomainofInnovationServicesinaDynamic,GlobalEnvironment
TheInnovationSystemanditsContinuouslyEvolvingConfigurationsof
Organisations,InstitutionsandPolicy
Domain of traditional research and
extension services
Messages from
Agricultural Research Farmers
Agricultural
policies,
regulation
National knowledge
infrastructure
Other
policies and
regulation
Financial
services
Markets and
companies Civil society
Political
shocks
Sustainable
Economic and
Social
Development
driven by
Innovation
driven
DomainofInnovationSupportServicesfor
Adaptation
Climate
change
shocks
Market and
price shocks
Animal and
human
health
shocks
Energy
shocks
LeeuwisandHall(2010)
Giventheabove,researchanditsusecannowbeseenasbeingonepartoftheinnovation
managementtaskassociatedwithadaptation.However,thekeyinsightthatideassuchas
innovationsystemsthinkinghaveprovidedistorecognisethattasksinthesethreedomains
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI14
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
havelittlemeaningontheirown(seetheargumentearlierinthissectionoverthenotionof
adaptivecapacityneedingtoincluderuralandnationalresources,etc.).Insteadadaptation
andinnovationareunderstoodtoinvolveacoherentsetoftasksandactionsacrossallthese
domains.Inotherwordsadaptationisaboutmanaginginnovationatthesemultiplelevels.
Partlythisconcernsbringingtogetherdifferentideasandresourcesfromdifferentsources;
italsoconcernsgettingusersofideastoinfluencethedevelopmentandadaptationofideas
andtechnology.Inpartitisalsoaboutensuringthatthepolicyandinstitutional
environmentallowsinnovationtotakeplace.This,inturn,mightmeanenablingnewforms
ofcoherentactionthatunleashinnovation(forexample,newtypesofpartnershipsand
alliances),oritmightinvolvepolicyandinstitutionalchangethatallownewproducts,
servicesandapproachestobeimplemented(forexample,communitybasedresource
management).
Intheoldwayofthinkingaboutagriculturalinnovation,innovationwasataskrelatedtothe
productionofideasbyresearch,andthesupplyofthesebyextensiontofarmersandthen
theirconsequentuse.Innovationmanagementinthisearlierframing,therefore,wasabout
makingsurefarmerswereawareaboutnewideas.Ascanbeseenabove,theideaof
innovationasaprocessdistributedthroughouteconomicsystemsanddefinedbyamore
broadbasedcapacityforadaptationgreatlybroadensthescopeoftheinnovation
managementtaskandpointstotheimportanceofarolethatisnotdirectlyinvolvedwith
innovation,butwhichinvolvesconnectingupdifferentelementsandhelpingcoordinate
coherentaction(Hall,2005).Thesewidertasksarereferredtovariously:somecallit
boundarywork(Kristjansonetal.,2009);othersrefertoitasintermediation(Howells,2006;
KlerkxandLeeuwis,2008)and,morerecently,theterm‘innovationbrokers’hasbeenused
(KlerkxandLeeuwis,2009).
Thecurrentliteratureonthesetopicspointstogenericinnovationmanagementtasksthat
onewouldexpecttoseeinaresearchintousetypeexperiment(thisclassificationdrawson
anumberofsources,includingKlerkxandLeeuwis,2009,buthasbeenelaboratedonand
reorganisedbytheauthors).
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI15
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Functions
Networkdevelopment
Organisationofproducersandconsumersintogroups
Enhancingaccesstotechnology,expertise,markets,credit,inputs
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange
Technicalandfieldpracticesupportforpolicyformulationandpolicylearning
Trainingonnewapproachesandwaysofworking
Articulationofresearchandtechnologyneedsofusers
Organisingforesightandvisionexercises
Conflictresolution
Reflectivelearning
Actions
Brokering
Convening
Negotiating
Facilitating
Advocating
Coaching
Mediating
Disseminating
Tools
Innovationplatforms
Researchanddevelopmentconsortia
Policyworkinggroups
Businessincubators
Innovationchallengefunds
Organisationalformats
Researchorganisations
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI16
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Publicadvisoryservices
Civilsocietyorganisations
Forprofitandhybridcompanies
Industry/producer/userassociationsandothersectorcoordinatingbodies
Thinktanks
Thirdpartytechnologybrokers
Venturecapitalfunds
Informationportals/specialistmedia/ecommerce
Itisimportanttostressthattheoldinnovationmanagementtasksofprovidingaccessto
technologyarenotsupersededbythesenewtasks.Rather,theseoldtasksonlyhave
usefulnessaspartofawidersetoftasksthatallowinnovationtotakeplace.Forthe
questionofhowtoputresearchintouseforinnovation,understandingwhatthesewider
setsoftasksareandunderstandinghowtheyshouldbeoperationalisedandbywhomin
differentinnovationtrajectorieswithdifferentstartingpointsbecomescritical.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI17
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
3. THE RIU PROGRAMME IN ASIA AND ITS INNOVATION
MANAGEMENT HYPOTHESIS
HistoricalDevelopment
CommissionedbyDFIDin2006,theResearchintoUse(RIU)programmehastwopurposes.
Firstly,itistogetthebestresearchresultsfrompastDFIDsupportedresearchinto
widespreaduseinAfricaandSouthAsia.Secondly,itistodrawlessonsontheprocessof
puttingresearchintouse;inotherwords,toteaseoutwhenandunderwhatcircumstances
andsettingsarangeofdifferentapproachesbecomemoreorlessusefulinmakingthebest
useofagriculturalresearchasapolicyinstrumentfordevelopment.
InSouthAsia,RIUselected13projectsthroughacompetitivegrantprocessaspartofits
InnovationChallengeFund(ICF)andtheprojectinterventionsstartedinJuly2008.These
weremodestscaleprojects(budgetsintherangeof£150500,000overthreeyears),
buildingonearlierresearchbymembersofprojectteams.Asoriginallyconceivedtherewas
noorganisingprinciplefortheselectionofprojectsorforlessonlearningfromtheprojects.
FollowingareviewoftheprojectsinJune2009,theprojectportfoliowasreducedto11.The
reviewscreenedtheprojectsonthebasisoftwocriteria:(i)Wastherepotentialfor
achievingimpactatscale?Andwastherepotentialforlearninglessonsaboutputting
researchintouse?Theprojectsdroppedwereeithertooresearchlikewithlowpotentialfor
impactorbecausetheydeployedimplementationstrategiesthatshowedlittlepromisein
termsofinformingtheprogrammeabouthowresearchcouldbeusedforinnovation.
FollowingthisreviewandthesubsequentappointmentofaCentralResearchTeam(CRT),
whichincludedauthorsofthispaper,theremaining11projectswereclusteredforlesson
learningpurposesalongthefollowinglines:
ParticipatoryCropImprovementInnovation
InnovationinValueChains
InnovationinNaturalResourceManagement
Others
AbriefdescriptionoftheprojectsisprovidedforreferencepurposesinAppendix1.More
detailsonprojectscanbefoundinVamsidharReddyetal,2010,andat
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI18
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
www.researchintouse.org.Asanexemplarweprovideadetailedhistoryofoneprojectso
thatreaderscangetasenseofthenatureoftheRIUprojectsand,particularly,thelocation
ofRIUactivitiesinthewiderhistoryoftheseinitiatives.
CaseStudyofanRIUAsiaProject:DecentralisedSeedProduction(DSP)inBangladesh
Thisprojectisfocusedonsettingupadecentralisedmicroenterprisebasedsupplynetwork
tosupplyfingerlingsofanimprovedbreedoftilapiatheprojectreferstothisasfishseed
andtheapproachasdecentralisedseedproduction(DSP).TheprojectisledbyRangpur
DinajpurRuralService(RDRS),awellestablishedandrespectedNGObasedinthenorthwest
ofBangladeshanareaofheightenedruralpoverty,whereintegratedfishandrice
productionsystemsisakeylivelihoodstrategy.Theprojectbuildsonanextensivehistoryof
researchanddevelopmentactivitiesinBangladeshandinternationally.Thisinnovation
trajectoryisillustratedinFigure2below).
FIGURE2.INNOVATIONTRAJECTORYFORAPPLICATIONOFDSPTHROUGHRIU
Source:Reddy,VamsidharT.S.(2010)
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI19
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
DevelopingtheDSPapproach
Severallargelyunconnectedeffortsseemtohavecontributedtothedevelopmentofthe
DSPapproach.Onestreamofeffortswasfirstlaunchedin1991byaprojectcalled
NorthwestFisheriesExtensionProject(NFEP)6innorthwestBangladesh.Theresearch
orientedstaffofNFEPattempteddecentralisedcommoncarpseedproductionthroughthe
collectionandthentranslocationofspawndepositedbyannualfloodsonaquaticplantsin
householdpondsandditchestoricefields.Theencouragingresultsofthisinitiative
promptedtheIntegratedRiceFish(InterFish)Project7topromotefishcultivationinrice
fieldsaspartofIntegratedPestManagementfishatethelarvaeofpest.Duringthis
period,effortswerelimitedtocommoncarp.This,however,changedwiththeintroduction
ofGIFT(GeneticallyImprovedFarmedTilapia).Thesehadoriginallybeendevelopedby
ICLARM(renamedasWorldFishCenter)incollaborationwithmanyresearchand
developmentagencies8.TheAsianDevelopmentBank(ADB)helpedtheBangladesh
FisheriesResearchInstitute(BFRI)tointroduceGIFTin1994aspartofaprojecton
“disseminationandevaluationofgeneticallyimprovedtilapiainAsia”.Thisstrainoffered
distinctadvantagesforfarmers.In1999,NFEPintroducedthisimprovedstrainoftilapiaas
partofaresearchtrialwithfarmers.TheGoInterfishproject,implementedbyCAREduring
20002005,furtherpromotedtheproductionofcommoncarpandtilapia(GIFT)inricefield
plots.
AnotherstreamofeffortsthatcontributedtothedevelopmentofDSPwastheresultofa
collaborationbetweentheAsianInstituteofTechnology(AIT),WorldFishCenter(aCGIAR
centre)andtheInstituteofAquacultureintheUniversityofStirling,UKFinancialsupportfor
theseinitiativeslargelycamefromtheUK’sOverseasDevelopmentAdministration(the
predecessortoDFID)throughitsRNRRSprogrammeandtheAsianDevelopmentBank.
ThesepartnersworkedwithnationalgovernmentdepartmentsandNGOstoadvance
6 TheNorthwestFishersExtensionProject(NFEP)wassupportedbyDFIDintwophasesduring19882000.Theregional
focuswastheimpoverishedNorthwestregionofBangladesh.NFEPtrainedandusedmorethan1,000fishseedtradersand
morethan250secondaryschoolteachersasextensionagents.Theyestablishedmorethan200modelvillagesinwhich
morethan9,000farmersreceivedtraininginaquaculture.
7 TheInterFishProjectwasimplementedbytheCooperativeAmericanReliefforEverywhere(CARE)withfinancialsupport
fromDFID.
8 ResearcheffortsfordevelopingGIFTwereinitiatedin1988throughacollaborationbetweenICLARM,theInstituteof
AquacultureResearchofNorway(AKVAFORSK),andthreePhilippineinstitutions:theFreshwaterAquacultureCentreof
CentralLuzonStateUniversity,theMarineScienceInstituteoftheUniversityofthePhilippines,andtheBureauofFisheries
andAquaticResources.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI20
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
technicalaspectsofdevelopingappropriatehatcherysystemsforlowcostfreshwaterfish.
Asaresult,technologiesfortilapia(inbothcommercialandsmallholdersituations),small
carpandsnakeskingourami9weredevelopedorrefined.Throughthe“Aquaculture
Outreachproject”(fundedbytheODAunderitsRNRRSprogramme)theinitiativepromoted
improvedavailabilityofqualityfishseedforfarmersandexploreddifferentapproachesto
suitdifferentconditions.Asaresultoftheseefforts,theimportanceandusefulnessofseed
productionbyfarmersorseedproductionwithgreaterinvolvementoffarmerswas
established.Subsequently,aresearchprojecton“improvingfreshwaterseedsupplyand
performanceinsmallholderaquaticsystemsinAsia”(fundedbyDFIDunderRNRRSR
7052)clarifiedmanyearlierperceptionsandfurtheradvancedknowledgeaboutfreshwater
fishseedproductioninAsia.TheDSPapproach,therefore,evolvedbycumulating
knowledgefromthesedifferentresearchanddevelopmentefforts.
EmergingdemandforDSPtoaddressproblemsinfreshwateraquaculture
Freshwateraquacultureisveryimportantforthelivelihoodsofvillagersinnorthwest
Bangladesh.Goodqualityfishseediscriticalforthesuccessoffreshwateraquaculture.
Althoughtherearemanypublicandprivatesectorhatcheries,theseexistinclustersandare
distantlylocated.Poortransportfacilities(fishseedisusuallytransportedbyseedling
tradersorpatheelwalas’inmetalpotstiedtobicycles)andlongerdistancesresultinhigher
mortalityandtransportationcosts.Monsoondependentfarmingresultsinhigherdemand
andhighercostsoffishseedduringpeakseasons.Allthesefactorsactasseriousconstraints
forsmallholderfarmerswhenitcomestoaccessinggoodqualityfishseed.Toaddress
theseissues,decentralisedfishfingerlingproductioninricefieldsbyfarmerswassuggested
asanoption,afterestablishingitsfeasibilitythroughtheeffortsmentionedabove.
Severalattemptsweremadetopopularisethisdecentralisedapproachbyagenciessuchas
theDepartmentofFisheries(DoF),BangladeshFisheriesResearchInstitute(BFRI),WorldFish
andseveralNGOs.Theseincludedspecialprojects,suchastheDecentralizationof
SustainableAquacultureProject(DASP)10andtheAdivasiFisheriesProject(AFP)11,to
9 Atypeoffish(biologicalnameTrichopoduspectoralis)
10 ImplementedbytheWorldFishCentreincollaborationwithabout40NGOsthroughoutBangladeshduring20002006.
ActivitiesfocusedoncreatingawarenessaboutandtrainingNGOstaffonDSP
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI21
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
demonstrateitsusefulnesstofarmers:campaigningontheradioandtelevisionandthrough
theeffortsofNGOssuchasRDRS.Individualfarmerswhoparticipateddirectlyinthese
effortscontinuedtogrowfishseedintheirricefields.However,theapproachwasnottaken
upwidely.Themainreasonforthiswasthelackofanappropriatesupplychainandsupport
servicesmechanismtoensureregularsupplyofGIFTfingerlings,providenecessarytechnical
knowledgeandpurchasemultipliedfingerlings.(SeeFigure3lateroninthissection)
ApplicationofDSPthroughtheRIUinitiative
ItwasatthispointthatthesupportofRIUenteredthepicture.Toaddresstheconstraints
discussedabove,RDRSledaconsortiumofNGOsfromtheNorthwestregiontocollaborate
withpartnerswithspecificexpertise.TheseincludedIDEBangladesh(International
DevelopmentEnterprises)fortheirmarketdevelopmentexpertise,WorldFishCentreforits
technicalexpertiseandtheBangladeshDepartmentofFisheriesforitstechnicaladvisory
mandate.TheconsortiumbuiltthenecessaryorganisationalarchitecturetoapplyDSP.Rice
fieldfarmers,tablefishfarmers,seasonalpondowners,andfingerlingtraderswereselected
andencouragedtobepartoftheinitiative.Rolestobeplayedbyeachofthemwere
specifiedandinteractionsamongthemfacilitatedbytheproject.Theyweresupportedwith
necessarytrainingandfinance.Afewselectedtablefishgrowers(pondowners)indifferent
regionswereencouragedtoplayrolesas‘satellitebroodrearers’(suppliersofGIFTbrood
fishtointerestedricefieldfarmers).Anumberofeducatedandunemployedyouthfrom
localareaswereselectedandtrainedtoplaytheroleoffieldtechnicianstoprovide
motivationandtechnicalknowledge,andclarifyanydoubtsfarmersinterestedinDSPmay
havehad.WorldFishCentrerepresentativesandpersonnelfromtheDepartmentof
Fisherieshelpedthesefieldtechniciansthroughtechnicalbackstopping.IDE,whichhas
extensiveexpertiseindevelopingruralmarkets,designedandimplementedlocallyspecific
activitiestodevelopmarketsforfingerlingsandbuildrelationshipsamongdifferentactors
alongthefishseedsupplychain.TheDepartmentofFisheriespromotedandmanageda
“broodbank”toensureasustainablesupplyofbroodstocktosatellitebroodrearers.Some
individualsselectedfromfingerlingtraders,ricefieldfarmersandtablefishgrowers
werepromotedas‘localentrepreneurs’andwereprovidedwithnecessaryknowledgeand
11 WorldFishCentrepromotedDSPwithcommoncarp,GIFTandcarpinricefieldsinitsAdivasiFisheriesProjectin
northwest(Rangpur,DinajpurandJaypurhatDistricts)andnorthern(SherpurandNetrokonaDistricts)Bangladesh
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI22
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
skillstopromotetheDSPconcept,benefitingthroughincreasedbusinesses.Manylocally
relevantideaswereimplementedwithregardstothecompositionoffishspeciestobe
cultivated,sizeoftheditchandbundsinthericefields,feedingpatterns,ensuredwater
supplyduringdryseasons,etc.Thetacitknowledgeofdifferentfunctionaries(includingfield
technicians,ricefieldfarmers,‘satellitebroodrearers’,fingerlingtraders,nurseryowners,
fisherydepartmentofficials,NGOstaff,etc.)wasutilisedfordevisingtheseapproaches.
WhatisimportanttonoteatthispointisthatRIUresourcesweremainlyusedbytheproject
tohelpbringinpartnerstoaninitiativethathad,inmanysensesandinmanydifferent
forms,beeninoperationformorethan10years.Themainfeatureofwhatthepartners
actuallyusedRIUresourcesforwastoimprovethescopeandqualityofrelationshipsand
attendantprocessesnecessaryforinnovation.Inthiscasetheinnovationwasamarketing
andinstitutionalinnovationthatallowedpoorfarmerstoaccessandbenefitfromimproved
fishbreeds.ItalsoimportanttorealisethatRIUprovidednorecipeforhowtheseprocesses
shouldbemanagedandthiswasprettymuchleftuptotheresourcefulnessofthepartners
involved.Acriticalelementofthiswastheidentificationofskillsetsrequiredtoaddress
emergingissues.So,forexample,theprojectstruggledinitiallyasRDRShadlittlemarketing
expertise.ThiswasresolvedbybringinginIDE,whichhasastrongtrackrecordofsettingup
marketingsystemsforthepoor.Thismeantthatpatternsofpartnershipevolved
considerablyastheinnovationtrajectoryofDSPunfolded(seeFigure3)
Partofthistaskofselectingandmanaginganevolvingconfigurationofpartnerswasto
createawinwinsituationforallparticipatingagencies.Inthisscenario,ricefieldfarmers
benefitedfromadditionalincomewithminimaladjustmentstotheirriceplotsandlittle
additionalinvestments.Tablefishpondfarmers,whoactedas‘satellitebroodrearers’,
benefitedfromadditionalincomebysellingbroodfishtoricefieldfarmers.Theypromoted
ricefieldfingerlingproductionastheycouldsellbroodfishtootherfarmers.Traders
benefitedfromaccessinggoodqualityfingerlinglocallyandatbetterprices.Thus,theywere
alsokeenonpromotingricefieldfingerlingproduction.Theproject,therefore,showsgreat
potentialforsustainability,giventhepromotionofDSPbydifferentagenciestofurther
individualbusinessinterests.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI23
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
FIGURE3.DIFFERENTSTAGESOFSTAKEHOLDERARCHITECTUREINPROMOTIONOFDSP
Situation1:
Relevantactors
andtheir
relationships:
Startingconditions
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
DoF
RDRS
WFC
Problems:
-Long distance transport – higher
mortality
-Higher cost during peak season
-Non availability of quality seed in
required quantity and quality
-Less role for poor people
-Lesser production of table fish
-Inefficient service delivery
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
DoF
RDRS
WFC
Problems:
-Long distance transport – higher
mortality
-Higher cost during peak season
-Non availability of quality seed in
required quantity and quality
-Less role for poor people
-Lesser production of table fish
-Inefficient service delivery
Source:Reddy,VamsidharT.S.(2010)
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
Rice-field
fingerling
producers
DoF
RDRS
WFC
-Problems with continuous
supplies of brood inputs
-Less motivation for interested
farmers to adopt
-Only farmers with whom it
was introduced are practicing.
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
Rice-field
fingerling
producers
DoF
RDRS
WFC
-Problems with continuous
supplies of brood inputs
-Less motivation for interested
farmers to adopt
-Only farmers with whom it
was introduced are practicing.
Situation3:
Relevantactors
andtheir
relationships:DSP
introducedbyan
creating
appropriate
architectureof
stakeholders
Situation2:
Relevantactors
andtheir
relationships:DSP
introducedin
individualfarmers’
fields
Increased
business
Increased
business
-Better quality
seed and timely
availability
-Choice of
different species
-Additional income
-Fish for home
consumption
-Better paddy crop
-Additional
income
-More promotion
more income
-Additional income
-Fish for home
consumption
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
Rice-field
fingerling
producers
S-pond
fingerling
producers
Pond
based
brood
fish
farmers
Lead entrepreneurs/
Pvt. Extn. agents
Brood
bank
DoF
RDRS
WFC
Increased
business
Increased
business
-Better quality
seed and timely
availability
-Choice of
different species
-Additional income
-Fish for home
consumption
-Better paddy crop
-Additional
income
-More promotion
more income
-Additional income
-Fish for home
consumption
Pond based
table-fish
producers
Nurserers
producing
fingerlings
Govt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Pvt.
hatcheries
producing
spawn
Input suppliers
(feed/
medicine, etc.)
Fingerling
traders
(Patheel
walas)
Netting
group
Whole-
sale
market
Retail
market
Export
market
Rice-field
fingerling
producers
S-pond
fingerling
producers
Pond
based
brood
fish
farmers
Lead entrepreneurs/
Pvt. Extn. agents
Brood
bank
DoF
RDRS
WFC
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI24
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
InnovationManagementHypothesesfortheRIUSouthAsiaProjects
ReviewingtheAsiaprojectproposalsrevealsthatthesewere,atbest,setupwitharather
simplistictheoryofchange.However,astheabovediscussionofoneoftheseprojects
indicates,theprojectshadimplicitworkinghypothesesthatshapedtheirorganisationand
modusoperandi,whichsuggeststhatamoresophisticatedtacittheoryofchangewasat
play.InexploringtheSouthAsiaprojectsitwouldseemusefultoretrospectivelyconstruct
thesehypotheses.Thishasbeendonebytheauthorsbasedonreviewsoforiginalproject
proposalsandthroughextendeddiscussionwiththeorganisationsimplementingthe
projects.Table1,whichispresentedlateroninthissubsection,presentstheseimplicit
hypothesesandpredictswiderinsightsoninnovationmanagementthateachprojectcan
provide.

Threesortsofimplicithypothesesarepresented:
(i)TheRIUhypothesis
Atthetimeprojectswereconceivedthenarrativeoftheprogrammewasaboutputting
researchfindingsintowideruse.So,despiteprogrammerhetoricaboutsystemsof
innovation“approaches”,projectsfounditnecessarytopresentthemselvesashavinga
ratherarchaictechnologytransferlogic:forexample,producingmoreseedtoimprove
demandanduptake;institutionalinnovationsfromLatinAmericathatcouldbetransferred
toSouthAsia,etc.
(ii)Specificimplementationhypotheses
Theprojectsexplicitlypresentedarangeofnovelwaysthatthetechnologytransfer
hypothesiswouldbeoperationalised.Forexample,settingupseedcompanies,training
communitybasedgroups,linkingupnewvaluechains,etc.

(iii)Innovationmanagementhypotheses
Again,thesewereoftenunstatedhypothesesaboutthewayinnovationandtheuseof
researchwouldtakeplace.Theseare,perhaps,themostinterestingastheyrevealhow
projectsactuallywentaboutmanagingtheinnovationprocess.RIUstipulatedtheuseof
partnerships.However,asoursubsequentdescriptionandanalysisoftheprojectsreveal,
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI25
Re
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
searchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI26
projectteams(eveninpreRIUactivities)hadbeendeployingquitesophisticatedinnovation
managementstrategiesthatincludebutgobeyondpartnership.Someofthisinvolved
brokeringandmaintainingpartnershipsandrelationships.Butthiswasnotjustin
operationalfielddomainsbutalsoinpolicyandinstitutionaldomains.Asweshallseesome
oftheprojectsclearlyknewmanyoftheseinnovationmanagementtasksfromearlier
experience,whileothershadtolearnthemalongtheway.
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
TABLE1:HYPOTHESESANDPROCESSINSIGHTS(INNOVATIONMANAGEMENTRESEARCHQUESTIONSASSOCIATEDWITHRIUPROJECTSIN
SOUTHASIA)
ThemesandprojecttitlesRIUHypothesisImplementationHypothesisInnovationManagement
Hypothesis
Processinsight
Questions/Innovation
ManagementResearch
Questions
IParticipatoryCrop
ImprovementinAsia

ImprovingLivelihoodsin
SouthAsiathrough
SustainedAccesstoNew
TechnologiesinRainfed
Agriculture
[India,Bangladesh]
Increasingtheavailabilityof
seedswillincreasedemand
andtherebyenhance
furtherproductionanduse
ofqualityseeds
Subsidisedmassproduction
anddistributionofseeds
anditspromotionthrough
NGOsandCommunity
BasedSeedProducers
(CBSPs)
Originalresearchleaders
canconveneNGOpartners
toimplementscalingup
NewRiceandLegumeSeed
fromClientOriented
Breeding(Nepal)
Increasingtheavailabilityof
seedswillincreasedemand
andtherebyenhance
furtherproductionanduse
ofqualityseeds
Subsidisedmassproduction
anddistributionofseeds
anditspromotionthrough
NGOsandCBSPs
Establishingseed
companiesunderNGOscan
supplyappropriateseedsto
poorpeople
Originalresearchleaders
cansupportNGOpartners
inscalingup
PovertyReductionthrough
CropIntensificationintoRice
Fallows(Nepal)
Increasingtheavailabilityof
seedswillincreasedemand
andtherebyenhance
furtherproductionanduse
ofqualityseeds
Subsidisedmassproduction
anddistributionofseeds
anditspromotionthrough
NGOsandCBSPs
Establishingseed
companiesunderNGOscan
supplyappropriateseedsto
poorpeople
Originalresearchleaders
cansupportNGOpartners
inscalingup
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
defined?
Whatarethe
mechanismsfor
managingtheuseofplant
breedingexpertisein
seedproduction?
Howareregulatoryand
policyissuesdealtwith?
Howdodifferent
organisationalformats
evolveindifferent
contextstodealwith
commercialproductionof
seeds?(Producer
companiesandNGO
sponsoredseed
companies)
IIValueChainInnovation
LinkingFarmerswith
MarketsforRuralProsperity
(Nepal,Vietnam,Cambodia)
Aninstitutionalinnovation
fromLatinAmericacanbe
adoptedandwidelyapplied
Linkingtheexistingactorsin
thevaluechain
Useprevioustrackrecordof
brokeringmarketsystem
developmenttodevelop
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI27
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
inNepalrelationshipsamongactors
inthevaluechain
CoalitiontoDiversifyIncome
throughUnderUtilised
Crops(India,Vietnam)
Pilotingcommunitybased
production,processingand
marketingarrangements
willleadtopromotionand
uptakeofunderutilised
crops
Organisecropfairsand
establishgermplasm
orchardsandfood
processingparksatthe
communitylevelto
establishnewvaluechains
Internationalresearch
leaderscancoordinatethe
implementationofthis
activitythroughNGOsin
Indiaandthenational
researchsysteminVietnam
DevelopingFishSeedValue
ChaininBangladesh
Promotionofthe
decentralisedfishseed
productionapproachwill
increaseavailabilityof
qualityfishseed
Linkingactorsinthenew
valuechain
Acoalitionthatcombines
technicalexpertisewith
NGOsandmarketsystem
brokerscancreateanew
andsustainablevaluechain
defined?
Howdoestherelative
successofapproaches
thatestablishnewvalue
chaincomparewiththe
valueofstrengthening
existingones?
Whatarethe)
mechanismsfor
managingresearch
expertiseinvaluechain
development?
Howarewiderregime
changesininstitutions
andpoliciesdealtwith?
IIINaturalResource
ManagementCluster

IntegratedFloodplain
Management(Bangladesh)
TrainingmoreCommunity
BasedOrganisations(CBOs)
intheIntegratedFloodplain
Managementapproach
wouldleadtoitsscalingup
TrainingCBOsandbroker
theirlinkswithtechnical,
legalandpolicyexpertise
Researcherscanorganisea
coalitionwithlocalNGOs
handlingimplementation
brokeringandalegal
supportpartnerhandling
policybrokering
ReducingPovertythrough
InnovationSystemsin
ForestryForestAction
Improvedgovernancein
communityforest
managementcanbe
achievedbytrainingmore
groups
TrainingCommunityForest
UserGroups(CFUGsfor
locallevelinstitutional
developmentandusingthis
evidencetoinfluencemacro
policy
SpecialNGOscanactas
brokersbetween
communitiesand
government
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
defined?
Howdoesoneaddress
changesintechno
institutionalregimes?
Whatbrokerage
mechanismsareusedat
field,organisational
(includingresearch)and
policylevels?Whatisthe
nature(what)and
operation(how)ofmicro
andmacropolicy
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI28
Re
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
searchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI29
brokering?
Roleofpolicybrokeringin
allowingresearchtobe
appliedathecommunity
level
IVOthers
RojiRoti:Promoting
SustainableLivelihood
Development(India)
Accesstocreditallowspoor
womentoaccess
productioninputsand
technology
Institutionaldevelopment
atcommunityleveland
brokeringlinkagesto
financialservicesandinputs
agencieswillcreatea
demandpullfordrawing
newtechnicalknowledge
Acombinationof
institutionaldevelopment
andbrokeringtoinputsand
serviceswillleadtothe
settingupofasustainable
hybridcompanythatdeals
withnonbankingfinancial
servicesandinputs
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
defined?
Whatistheeffectiveness
ofabusinessmodelthat
combinesfinancialand
technicalbrokering?
RatManagementforRural
Communities(Bangladesh)
Increasingthesupplyofrat
trapswillreducerat
population,ifcommunities
aretrainedincommunity
basedratmanagement
LocalNGOscantrain
communitiesand
companiescanmanufacture
rattraps
Technologytransferand
trainingadequatefor
widespreadadoptionofthe
technology
PromotingSustainable
CoastalAquaculturein
Bangladesh(ProSCAB)
Trainingfishing
communitiesinnew
technologiesleadstowide
scaleuse
Trainingandestablishing
enterprisegroupsbyNGOs
willconnectfishing
communitiestomarkets
andfacilitatetechnology
adoption
Researcherscanbrokera
coalitionthatwillleadto
localenterprise
developmentanduseof
researchfindings
Howarepartnerships
characterisedandthe
roleofkeyplayers
defined?
Whatisthenatureand
operationofthesector
coordinatingbody?
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
4. WHAT DOES INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REALLY INVOLVE?
Ourearlierdiscussionpredictedalargerangeofinnovationmanagementfunctions,actions,
toolsandorganisationalformats.WhiletheRIUprojectportfolioinAsiahasnot
demonstratedalloftheseitstillillustratesadiversityoftasksinvolvinginnovation
managementtoputresearchintouse(ThesearesummarisedinTable2lateroninthis
section).Itisalsonotablethatprojectsdonotjustdeployonefunctionoroneactionbut
clusterthese.Thefollowingpointsseemtobeimportant:
Functions
(i)Networkingandpartnershipbuilding
Withoutexceptionprojectshaveperformedthisfunction,buttherehavebeenanumberof
differentvariants.Mostprojectshavebuiltpartnershipstoimplementtheprojectandhave
oftennamedthesepartnersinprojectdocumentation.Theseprojectpartnersaredistinct
fromthoseinoperationalpartnershipsthatistosaypartnerships/networksthatthe
projectsoughttobuildtomanagetheinnovationprocess.Forexample,theprojectsdealing
withvaluechaindevelopmenthadtobrokerrelationshipsamongavarietyofmarketagents,
inputdealersandproducers.Theprojectsdealingwithpromotingseedsdevelopedthrough
ParticipatoryCropImprovementhadtonetworkwithseedgrowers,localagrovets(agro
inputsellers),millersandradiostations.
(ii)Settingup/Strengtheningusergroups
Settingupusergroupsandbuildingtheircapacityisanothercommonfunctionundertaken
byalltheseprojects.Communitybasedseedproducer(CBSPs)groupsinParticipatoryCrop
Improvement;communitybasedorganisations(CBOs)andcommunityforestusergroups
(CFUGs)inNaturalResourceManagement;selfhelpgroupsformicrofinance,occupational
groupsundertheProSCABprojectoncommercialproductionofmarineproductsin
Bangladesh,etc.,areallsuchexamples,wheretheprojectseitherhadtoformorworkwith
existingusergroupstomanageinnovation.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI30
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
(iii)Training
Trainingusergroupsandotheractorsinthewiderimplementationnetworkisanother
importantfunctiontheseprojectshavehadtoundertake.Topicscoveredincludedquality
seedproduction,broodfishmanagement,fingerlingproduction,rodentmanagement,
democraticgovernanceofforests,enterprisedevelopment,businessskills,accountkeeping,
etc.Inotherwordsitwasbothtechnicaltrainingassociatedwithaparticulartechnology
basedinnovationaswellastraininginwideraspectsoforganisationalandinstitutional
development.

(iv)Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange
Aspolicyplaysanimportantroleinthewideruptakeofknowledge,alltheprojectsareeither
collaboratingwithpolicyrelevantpartnersorarelookingforopportunitiestoengagewith
policyactorsatthenationallevel.WhilepromotingParticipatoryCropImprovement,the
projectsinNepalhadtoengagewiththeNepalAgriculturalResearchCouncilandtheNational
SeedBoardtobringaboutchangesinpoliciesrelatedtovarietalreleaseandseedlaws.This
wasessentialinordertogettheNGOsofficialrecognitionfortheirroleinplantbreedingand
releaseofvarietiesaswellastheirpromotionofgoodpractices,includingthepromotionof
communitybasedseedproducersingovernmentseedselfsufficiencyprogrammes.
TheIntegratedFloodplainManagementprojectinBangladeshhadtoengagewithpolicies
relatedtoleaseofwaterbodiesandneededsupporttodealwithlegalchallenges.Theproject
isworkingcloselywiththeSocietyforWaterResourcesManagement(SWRM)afederation
ofwatermanagementcommunitybasedorganisationstoinfluencepolicies.Community
basedforestryenterprisescansucceedinNepalonlyiftheforestrydepartment’sexcessive
bureaucraticcontrolscouldberelaxed;thus,theFederationofCommunityForestUsers,
Nepal(FECOFUN)isanimportantpartnerinthecommunityforestryprojectinthatcountry.
BothNepal’sForestActionandtheBangladeshEnvironmentLawyersAssociation(BELA)have
extensiveexperienceinworkingforpolicychangeandarepartofseveralpolicylevel
consultations.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI31
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
(v)Enhanceaccesstotechnology,expertise,markets,creditsandinputs
Ruralcommunitiesneedaccesstoawidersetofsupportandotherservicestoapplythe
newknowledgebeingpromoted.Projects,therefore,hadtoenhanceaccesstotechnology,
expertise,markets,creditandinputs.Forinstance,theRojiRotimicrofinanceprojectbegan
itsactivitiesbyformingselfhelpgroupsbeforelendingtothem,andthenlinkingthe
communitiestosourcesofinputs,technology,sourcesoflargercreditandtechnicaltraining
oncropproductionandsmallenterprisedevelopment.TheProSCABprojectonpromoting
aquaculturetechnologiessetuptwocrabhatcheriestosupportenterprisegroupsoncrab
fatteningenterprisespromotedundertheproject.Italsohadtolinkthegroupstomarket
agents(retailersandexporters)inthefishvaluechain.Theprojectonpromotingcommunity
valueadditioninitiativesinunderutilisedcropshadtosearchforsmallscaletechnologies
forprocessingmilletinIndiatosupportthecommunitiesitwasworkingwith.
(vi)Reflectivelearning
Reflectivelearningisanimportantfunctioninmostoftheprojectsandthisisevidentfromthe
widerangeofconsultationbasedactivitiesundertaken.Theseincludereviews,reflections,
experiencesharingworkshops,negotiationsamongdifferentgroups,studyvisits,settingup
resourcecentres,etc.Thisismoreevidentinthenaturalresourcemanagementcases,where
workshopstoreflectonpastprogressanddecideonfuturecourseofactionareheldregularly.
Actions
Awiderangeofactionshadtobetakentomanageinnovationandthisismoreorless
commonacrossallprojects.
(i)Convening
Asinnovationmanagementrequiresperformingseveralfunctionsandcoordinatingawide
rangeofpartners,conveningmeetings,platforms,consultations,anddiscussionsamongthe
implementationandoperationalteamsisanessentialactionthatneedstobeundertakenby
projectteams.Whiletheleadpartnerhasbeendoingthisactivityattheimplementation
level,otherpartnershavebeenperformingthisactivityatthefieldlevelwithother
implementationpartners.Whoperformsthisactionisessentiallydecidedbasedonthe
natureaswellaslocationofthetaskathand.Forinstance,inthevaluechainprojectin
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI32
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Nepal,whiletheleadpartnerIDEconvenedprojectmeetingsandinterfacedwithpolicy(the
DepartmentofAgriculture,theNationalAgriculturalResearchCouncil,donors,etc.)the
MarketingandPlanningCommitteeconvenedotherkindsoftrainingandlinkingactivitiesat
thecommunitymanagedcollectioncentrelevel.
(ii)Brokering
Innovationmanagementessentiallydependsoncreatingmanytomanyrelationships
amongthewiderangeofactors.Thisaction,whichinvolvesdeveloping,maintainingand
strengtheningtheserelationships,isincreasinglyconsideredanimportantfeatureof
innovationmanagement.ThebrokeringintheRIUprojectswasfoundtobeimplementedby
differentorganisationsatdifferentlevels,dependingontasksathandandexpertise.Some
organisationsinvolvedhavealonghistoryofbrokering.Forinstance,IDEisconsideredan
importantmarketdevelopmentbrokerandunderRIUinNepalandBangladeshithasbeen
brokeringrelationshipsamongtheactorsinthehorticultureandfreshwaterfisheriesvalue
chainrespectively.ForestActioninNepalisapolicybrokerandawellrecognisedthinktank
onforestpolicymanagementandundertheRIUprojectithasbeenbrokeringrelationships
withthefederationofcommunityforestusergroupsandthestateforestdepartment.
(iii)Facilitating
Thisisamoreoperationaltask,wheretheleadpartnerneedstoensuredifferentsetsof
activitiestakeplace.Forinstance,thenetworkofNGOsassociatedwiththeIntegrated
FloodplainManagementprojectinBangladeshfacilitatesdiscussionsofcommunitybased
organisationmembersaroundtheissueofParticipatoryActionPlanDevelopment.The
CentreforPromotingSustainableLivelihoods(CPSL),thespecialistmicrofinanceNGOinthe
stateofBiharinIndia,facilitatespoorwomentolinkwithsourcesoftechnicalexpertise
relatedtoagricultureandsmallhouseholdlevelenterprisedevelopment.Similarly,Forward
andLibird,thetwoNGOsinNepal,facilitatethecommunitybasedseedproducersto
accesspublicfundingfromgovernmentsourcestostrengtheninfrastructure.
(iv)Coaching
Thisactioniscloselyrelatedtobuildingcapacitiesofusergroupsandotherpartner
organisationsthrough‘handholding’sothattheycanbetterarticulatetheirneeds,
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI33
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
perceptionsandviewstoothers.Thisinvolvessometraining,butissomethingmorethan
that.Forinstance,inthecommunityforestmanagementprojectinNepal,formationof
hamletlevelcommitteesandthematiccommitteeshavehelpedruralcommunitiesto
understandclearlytherolesandfunctionsofcommunityforestusergroupsandhowto
managethem.Similarly,ForwardandLibirdhavebeencoachingcommunitybasedseed
producers(CBSPs)onimprovingtheirbusinessskills.Itisthiskindofcoachingthathas
allowedtheCBSPstopartnerwiththenewseedcompaniesbeingputinplacebythe
project.Thevaluechainprojectonpromotingdecentralisedfishseedproductionin
Bangladeshiscoachingactorsinthevaluechainonmanagingproduceinawaythatwill
allowthemtosustainandexpandthisenterprise.
(v)Advocating
Advocatingforchangesinpoliciesandinstitutionsisacriticalactivityforsuccessful
innovationmanagement.Invitingpolicyrelevantstafffromgovernmentagenciesinproject
deliberationsheldatdistrictandnationallevelsisacommonlyusedactivityacrossvarious
projects.OrganisationssuchasBELAandForestActionaremembersofcommitteesand
policyworkinggroupsformedbythegovernmentsinBangladeshandNepal,respectively.
ThisallowsthemtopresentevidencefromRIUprojectstoadvocateforrelevantchangesin
policy.Anotherstrategyemployedistoworkwithfederationsofusergroups,whichare
relativelymorepowerfulinademocraticsetup.PartneringwithFECOFUN(theFederation
ofCommunityForestUserGroups)andSWRM(afederationofCommunityBased
Organisations)allowstheNaturalResourceManagementprojectsunderRIUtoadvocate
better.
(vi)InformationDissemination
Althoughthisisatraditionalactivity,ithasanimportantroleininnovationmanagement.
Whatisinterestinghereisthepowerofthisactivitywhenperformedinrelationtotheother
setsofactivitiesmentionedabove.TheParticipatoryCropImprovementprojectsinNepal
usedFMradios,whichareverypopularinruralNepal,todisseminateinformationonthe
availabilityandsignificanceofseedsproducedbythecommunitybasedseedorganisations.
TheratmanagementprojectinBangladeshhasbeenpromotingimprovedratmanagement
practicesonnationaltelevision.ThecommunityforestmanagementprojectinNepalhas
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI34
Re
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
searchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI35
investedresourcesincommunityradiostationsinNepaltosensitiselistenerstonewways
ofgoverningcommunitymanagedforests.
(vii)Negotiating
Thisactivityinvolvestheprocessofreachingasatisfactorycompromiseoragreement
betweenindividualsorgroups.Forinstance,conflictsbetweenfarmersandfishermenover
dryseasonwaterareacommonfeatureinthefloodplainsofBangladesh.Throughaseries
ofworkshopstheprojectonIntegratedFloodplainManagementreachedaconsensus
betweentwoparties,ultimatelyusingtechnologicalandinstitutionaloptionstomaximise
floodplainproductivity.HamletlevelandthematiccommitteesformedbyNepal’s
communityforestmanagementprojectnegotiateoverrightsofmarginalisedandpoor
peopleatforestusergroupmeetings.
(viii)Mediating
Thisisaformofconflictresolutioninwhichthemediatortriestoimprovedialoguebetween
disputantstohelppartiesreachanagreement.Forinstance,inthefloodplainmanagement
projectinBangladeshcommunitybasedorganisationsareoftenatoddswithruralelites
overissuesofleasingandusingwaterbodies.TheBangladeshEnvironmentLawyers
Association(BELA)advisesandsupportsCBOsbutalsomediatesbetweentheCBOsandthe
ruralelitestowardreachingsomesortofresolutionoutsidethecourts.
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Table2:InnovationManagementFeaturesinRIUSouthAsiaProjects
Themesandproject
titles
InnovationManagementFeatures
 FunctionsActionsToolsOrganisationalFocus
IParticipatoryCrop
Improvementin
Asia

Improving
LivelihoodsinSouth
Asiathrough
SustainedAccessto
NewTechnologies
inRainfed
Agriculture
(India,Bangladesh)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Settingupusergroups(e.g.,organisingseedproducers)
Training(e.g.,ontechnicalaspectsandbusinessskills)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,seedlaws
andvarietalrelease)
Convening
Brokering
Facilitating
Advocating
Coaching
Graincashseed
banks
Producer
Company
UK‐based
/Internationalcrop
researchgroup
NewRiceand
LegumeSeedfrom
ClientOriented
Breeding(Nepal)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Settingupusergroups(e.g.,organisingseedproducers)
Training(e.g.,ontechnicalaspectsandbusinessskills)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,seedlaws
andvarietalrelease)
Convening
Brokering
Facilitating
Coaching
Advocating
Disseminating
Information
Community
Basedseed
producergroups
NGOledprivate
commercialseed
production
company
CivilSociety
Organisation
Forprofithybrid
company
Povertyreduction
throughcrop
intensificationinto
ricefallows(Nepal)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Settingupusergroups(e.g.,organisingseedproducers)
Training(e.g.,ontechnicalaspectsandbusinessskills)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,seedlaws
andvarietalrelease)
Convening
Brokering
Facilitating
Advocating
Coaching
Disseminating
Information
Community
Basedseed
producergroups
NGOledprivate
commercialseed
production
company
CivilSociety
Organisation
Forprofithybrid
company
IIValueChain
Innovation

LinkingFarmersNetworkdevelopmentFacilitatingParticipatoryMarketdevelopment
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI36
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
withMarketsfor
RuralProsperity
(Nepal,Vietnam,
Cambodia)
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Training(e.g.,trainingmarketcommitteememberson
leadershipdevelopment,accountkeeping,product
marketing)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,usingthe
advisorycommitteescomprisingpolicyrelevantstafffrom
thegovernmentforpresentingtheapproachandresultsto
facilitatewideruptakeofthisapproachbytheGovernment
ofNepal)
Convening
Brokering
MarketChain
Analysis
ThematicGroups
MarketPlanning
Committees
ProjectAdvisory
Committees
NonprofitNGO
Coalitionto
diversifyincome
throughunder
utilisedcrops(India,
Vietnam)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Training(e.g.,onproductionandprocessingaspectsto
producergroups)
Articulationofresearchandtechnologyneedsofusers(e.g.,
demandfornewtechnologiestodealwithcommunitylevel
processingofmilletinIndia)
Convening
Facilitating
Community
germplasm
orchards
VillageCropfairs
Foodprocessing
parks
International
Research
Organisation
Developingfish
seedvaluechainin
Bangladesh
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Traininganddemonstrationofnewapproachesandwaysof
working(e.g.,trainingonbroodfishmanagement,fingerling
production,establishinganewsustainablevaluechain)
Marketpromotionandmarketplacedevelopment
(e.g.,postersandsignboardsanddevelopinganewfingerling
marketplace)
Convening
Facilitating
Brokering
Valuechain
development
Useoflead
entrepreneurs
NGO
IIINaturalResource
Management
Cluster

Integrated
Floodplain
Management
(Bangladesh)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Traininglocalgroups(e.g.,trainingtocommunitybased
Convening
Negotiating
Brokering
Advocating
Community
BasedUser
groups
LegalsupportNGO
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI37
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
organisationsonIntegratedPestManagement,water
management,etc.andorganisingexposurevisits)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,training
communityleadersonpolicies,laws,advocacyandlobbying)
Enhanceaccesstotechnology,expertise,markets,credit
andinputs(e.g.,linkingcommunitybasedorganisationsto
localserviceproviders)
Conflictresolution(e.g.,outof‐courtsettlementthrough
negotiationandlegalsupportwhenrequired)
Reflectivelearning(e.g.,regularworkshopstoreflecton
progressanddecideonfuturecourseofaction)
Supporttopolicylearning(e.g.,workshopsandconventions
onaccessandlegalobstacles)

MediatingParticipatory
ActionPlan
Development
Community
resourcecentres
Policyworking
groups
ReducingPoverty
throughInnovation
SystemsinForestry
(Nepal)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Technicalandfieldpracticesupporttopolicyformulation
andpolicylearning
(e.g.,drawingpolicyrelevantlessonsfromfield
implementationandusingthisforpolicydeliberationsat
mesoandmacrolevels)
Advocacyforinstitutionalandpolicychange(e.g.,
promotingpolicyrelevantfindingsthroughforestpolicy
seminarseries,amonthlydeliberationorganisedbyForest
ActiononforestpolicygovernanceinNepal)
Strengtheningusergroups(e.g.,Trainingcommunityforest
usergroupsanddecentralisedhamletlevelcommitteeson
democraticgovernanceofforestsanduseofcommunity
radiotodisseminatebestpractices)
Reflectivelearning(e.g.,useofclusterlevelsharing
workshops,districtlevelmeetingsandnationalworkshops)
Convening
Negotiating
Brokering
Advocating
Mediating
Disseminating
Information
Thematic
Committees
Policyworking
groups
Community
Basedresource
centres
Clusterlevel
sharing
workshops
ForestPolicy
SeminarSeries
Policythinktankand
actionresearchNGO
IVOthers   
RojiRoti:Promoting
Sustainable
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
Brokering
Financing
NonBanking
Financial
International
Consultancy
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI38
Re
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
searchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI39
Livelihood
Development
(India)
network)
Accesstocredit,technicalexpertiseandinputs(e.g.,
traininglocalvolunteerstoactasasourceofmicrocredit,
productioninputsandtechnicalknowledge)
Advocatingforpolicyandinstitutionalchange(e.g.,sharing
lessonswithothermicrofinanceinstitutions,trainingother
agenciesinadoptingthisapproachtoruralservicedelivery
andliaisingwiththeindustryassociationonmicrofinance)
Facilitating
Company
Farminput
intermediary/
distributor
Company
RatManagement
forRural
Communities
(Bangladesh)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Training(e.g.,communityrodentmanagementanduseof
improvedrattraps)
Convening
Facilitating
Research
Extension‐
Private
manufacturer
consortium
LocalNGO
Promoting
SustainableCoastal
Aquaculturein
Bangladesh
(ProSCAB)
Networkdevelopment
(e.g.,developmentofprojectcoalitionandimplementation
network)
Organisinglocalgroups(e.g.,settingupoccupational
groups)
Training(e.g.,trainingfarmersonimprovedtechnologies
andsettingupenterprises)
Accesstoinputsandmarkets(e.g.,establishinghatchery
andlinkstotradersandhotelindustry)
Convening
Facilitating
Mediating
Researchand
Extension,NGO
consortia
PrivateHatchery
SectorCoordination
body
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Tools
Toolsaretheformatsoroperationalmechanismsusedinprojectstomanageinnovation
innovationplatformsbeingthemostcommonlycited,albeitlesstangibleoption.Thegrain
cashseedbankisanothertooloramechanismadoptedatthecommunityleveltohelp
resolvetheissueofseedavailability.Communitybasedseedproducergroups,producer
companiesandotherorganisationalformssuchasNGOledprivatecommercialseed
productioncompaniesareallformatsthatallowbringingtogetherdifferentactorsand
complementaryknowledgeneededformanaginginnovation.ParticipatoryMarketChain
AnalysisisatoolusedtostrengthenthevaluechainintheIDEledprojectinNepal.To
implementthisapproach,otherformsofplatformshadtobecreated,includingthematic
committees,marketingandplanningcommittees,etc.Communitybasedgermplasm
orchardsandfoodprocessingparksareothertoolsusedinthevaluechainprojects.
Communityresourcecentresareusedastoolsforknowledgesharinganddisseminationin
theNaturalResourceManagementprojects.Advisory/steeringcommitteesaretoolsto
enhancevisibilityoftheinterventionstopolicymakers.
Organisationformats
ThereisadiversityoforganisationsleadingtheRIUinitiatives.Thesevaryfrominternational
researchinstitutes(suchasCAZS,ICUC),NGOs(LiBird,Forward,RDRS,AidComilla),private
consultingfirms(GYA),specialistmarketbrokeringNGOs(IDE),legalsupportNGOs(BELA),
policythinktanks(ForestAction)andsectorcoordinationbodies(BFRF).Themannerin
whichprojectcoalitionshavebeenformedbysuchdiverseorganisationshaspartlytodo
withthehistoryorevolutionoftheseinitiativesovertheyears.Itisthispathdependency
thathasledtotheemergenceofthiswidediversityoforganisationalformatsconvening
theseinitiatives.Anotherreasonforthisdiversityisthediversityinfunctionsandactivities
thatisneededforinnovationmanagementandthecomparativeadvantageofcertainkinds
oforganisationsinleadingsuchinitiatives.Forinstance,leadershipbyanorganisationsuch
asForestActioniscriticalforpromotinginstitutionalandgovernanceinnovationin
communityforestmanagementinNepal,whereasoneneedsanorganisationlikeIDEin
Nepaltoleadaninitiativethatreliesonstrengtheningtherelationshipsamongvarious
actorsinthevaluechain.Bothhavespecialexpertiseandcredibilitywhenitcomesto
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI40
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
dealingwiththesechallenges.Whileresearchersledmanyofthepreviousinitiativesthat
focusedonthegenerationofnewknowledge,inmostofthecasestheyplayasecondaryor
supportingroleasthenatureofleadershipandknowledgerequiredforinnovation
managementismuchbroaderthanwhatresearcherscanbringin.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI41
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
5. DISCUSSION: TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF HOW TO
MANAGE INNOVATION IN ORDER TO PUT RESEARCH INTO USE
IN SOUTH ASIA
Thepurposeofthispaperistosetthesceneratherthandrawdefinitiveconclusionsabout
RIU’sprojectsinAsia.Whatdoesittellusaboutstudyingruralinnovationmanagementfor
puttingresearchintouse?Andwhataresomeofthewiderimplicationsforpolicyand
practice?Thefollowingobservationsmightbeuseful.
TheframeworkdevelopedinSection3forlookingatinnovationmanagementseemstohave
beenusefulintermsofunpickingthefinegraineddetailaboutwhatisactuallyinvolvedin
thistask.TheRIUresearchdesign(seeHalletal.,2010)hadsuggestedexploringinnovation
forputtingresearchintousethroughthelensofsixinnovationnarrativesasfollows:1)Poor
UserLedInnovation2)PublicPrivatePartnershipLedInnovation3)CapacityDevelopment
LedInnovation4)BelowtheRadarLedInnovation5)InvestmentLedInnovation6)
ResearchCommunicationLedInnovation.Halletal.(2010)acknowledgethatthese
narrativesareoverlappingandthattheyarestylisedpolicyoptions.Theuseofthe
innovationmanagementtaskframeworkdeployedinthispaper,however,seemstobea
moreusefulwayofcapturingthebroadscopeandeclecticnatureofinnovation
management.Itavoidsgettingcaughtupinthedilemmaofdecidingwhichnarrativebest
describesaparticularprojectoractivity.Similarly,itavoidsthetendencytopigeonhole
groupsofactionasbeingan‘approach’.Instead,ithasamuchmorepragmaticflavour,
focusingonwhatisactuallybeingdoneandworryinglessaboutwhatitiscalled.
WhatquicklybecomeapparentwhenonelooksatthedetailofRIUprojectsisthattheway
innovationismanagedisahighlyiterativeprocess.Thisisparticularlyapparentwhenone
takesamorehistoricallookattheinnovationtrajectory,liketheoneonfishseed.Buteven
intheconfinesoftheRIUprojectsthereisiteration;again,anexamplefromthefishseed
projectisthewayapartnerwithmarketingsystemsexpertiseneededtobebroughtin.This
raisesquestionsabouthowexperimentsshouldbeorganisedandstudied.Oneoption
wouldbetoorganisetheseasactionlearningoractionresearchprojects,wherethe
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI42
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
functionofresearchistobothhelpdriveiterationaswellashelpdrawwiderlessons.RIU
has,however,setupitsresearchactivitiesinawaythatisoperationallyandadministratively
separatefromtheprojectsthatitisderivinglessonsfrom.Therearepragmaticreasonsfor
thisnotleastofwhichwasthefactthattheprojectsstartedsome2yearsbeforethe
researchwasstarted.Moreimportantly,however,sincethepurposeofRIU’sresearchisto
informpolicyofbettergenericstrategiesforusingresearchforinnovationandimpact,
keepingtheresearchatarmslengthfromtheoperationofprojectsseemswisefor
objectivityreasons.Thisdoesnot,however,detractfromtheobservationthatmore
systematiclearningwithinprojectteamscouldhelpdriveprojectiterationaroundthe
modesofinnovationmanagementdeployed.Thiscouldbeachievedbyformallyorganising
interventionssuchasactionresearchinitiativesoralternativelyitcouldalsobeachievedby
simplystrengtheningmonitoringandlearningfunctions.Thisisnotanewideaformanyof
theprojectteamsinAsiaasthishasbeenconsideredgoodpracticeindevelopment
programmesforsometime.OrganisationsinsomeoftheRIUprojectstheForestAction
ledone,forexamplehaveindeedgoneonestepfurtherandactivelywrittenuplessons
fromtheirworkforwiderconsumption.Alogicalstepfurthermightbetoclusterthese
typesofinitiativesascommunitiesofpracticetostrengthentheselessonlearning
dimensions.
InasimilarveinwhenonetakesamorehistoricallookattheRIUprojectsandthewaythey
aremanaginginnovation,itisclearthatformanyofthemthisisnotasuddenshiftfrom
doingeitherdevelopmentorresearchprojects.Insteadwhatisapparentisthatthesetwo
distinctionshavebeenblurringinpracticeforquitesometime.Theexistenceofarangeof
sophisticatedstrategiestomanageinnovationmeansthatthishasnothappenedovernight,
andithasbeenapragmaticresponsetodealingwiththegoalsofthevariousorganisations
involved.Ifthisisthecasethendevelopmentplanningneedstorevisithowitgoesabout
providingsupporttoruraldevelopment.Themainthingthatstandsoutisthatintermediary
organisationsandtheseareoftencivilsocietyorganisationsadoptingenterpriselike
principles—maynotnecessarilyhaveatechnicalstakeintheinnovationprocesstheyare
managing.Thisnotanentirelynewfinding:Forexample,Clarketal.(2003)describesthe
wayonesuchcivilsocietyorganisationsucceededasanintermediaryorganisation,
managinginnovationnotbecauseithadexpertiseinthetopic(packaginginthecase
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI43
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
discussed),butpreciselybecauseitdidnot;thereforeitwasunburdenedofpreconceived
approachesandideas.Thisisnottosaythatcivilsocietyorganisationshaveafreeholdon
actingasintermediaries.And,indeed,asthispaperhasshowedarangeoforganisational
typescanperforminnovationmanagementtasks.Therearestillempiricalquestionsabout
whether,undersomecircumstancesandforspecificobjectivessuchassocialequity,some
typesoforganisationsaremoresuitedtoperformingthistaskinruraldevelopmentdomains
thanothers.
Thisleadstoapreliminaryfindingaboutthenatureofinnovationmanagementthatseems
tohaveprofoundimplicationsforhowtheissueofputtingresearchintouseistackled.The
reviewoftheAsiaprojectsdoesnotonlyrevealthediversityofinnovationmanagement
tasksthatarebeingperformed,butitalsostressesthebundlingtogetherofthese.Of
course,theKlerkxandLeeuwistypologythatispresentedinanadaptedforminSection2
stressestheinterdependenceoftheseactivities.However,whatthisreviewofRIUprojects
highlightsisthatwhilefacilitatingaccesstotechnologyisimportantinputtingresearchinto
use,thisasoneofarangeofinnovationmanagementtasksonlyhasvaluewhenitis
bundledtogetherwithothersupportivetasks(accesstomarkets,conveningconsortia,etc).
ThisisillustratedinFigure4.Thishasaveryimportantimplicationforpolicy.Itmeansthat
puttingresearchintouserequiresprojects,organisationsand/orinitiativeswhosechief
characteristicisnotprimarilyasaconduittotechnologybutratherisoneofbeingableto
undertakeamuchwiderrangeofinnovationmanagementtasks.Thismirrorsfindingsabout
RIU’sbestprojectsinwhichnewtypesofenterprisesservicingeconomicandsocialgoalsare
performingtheserolesasapragmaticpartoftheirbusinessmodel(Halletal.,2010)
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI44
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Figure4.InnovationManagementTasks
INNOVATIONandIMPACT
Communicating
researchneeds
Brokering
Network
development
Advocacyfor
policyand
regulatory
changeFacilitatingaccesstoinput
andoutputmarkets
Negotiatingaccessto
credit/venturecapital
Mediatingconflict
resolution
Convening
innovation
platforms
Incubating
social
enterprises
Training
and
coaching
FacilitatingAccessto
technology
Organisingfarmers
intogroups
Ourexplorationofthesecaseshasalsorevealedanumberofotherobservationsthatwe
feelmeritrecordinghere.
Thefirstconcernsprojects‘dumbingdown’toaccessdonorfunds.Theoriginalproposition
oftheRIUprogrammeofidentifyingresearchproductsthatcouldberolledoutright
awayseems,inretrospect,ludicrouslysimplisticwhencomparedtosophisticated
innovationmanagementstrategiesthatprojectsdeployed.Itishighlyquestionablewhether
anyoftheprojectsreallybelievedthatthiswasafinalpushtohaveimpact.Inrealitymany
seemhaverecognisedthattheyweresomewherealongthewayinalongtrajectoryof
learningaboutparticulardevelopmenttopicsandhowtotacklethem.
Theproblemstheyencounteredwerediverse:forestmanagement,thenatureofplant
breedingorAsiamarketingsystems.Whattheprojectteamsneededwasmorefundingto
movethemfurtheralongthattrajectory(somearealreadyintotheirpostRIUfunding).A
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI45
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
cynicmightsaythattheprojectssimplycomprisedgroupsofresearchersandNGOshopping
fromonesourceofdonorfundingtothenext.Thisprobablyneedstobebalancedbythe
recognitionthatthereisn’tanendpointforputtingresearchintouse,because,like
developmentitself,itisacontinuousprocessofadaptationandchange.Certainlythisraises
furtherquestionsabouthowthedevelopmentprocessshouldbefunded.
Thesecondpointisaboutasenseofhumilityinthebiggerschemeoftheinnovation
trajectories.ItisclearthatRIUshouldbethankfulthattheseprojectsdidpresent
themselvesforfundingbecausewhatthesegroupsofresearchersanddevelopment
practitionersbroughtwiththemwasahistoricallyderivedsetofexperienceandstrategies,
whichappeartobehighlyrelevanttotheinnovationtaskasitisnowunderstood.RIU’s
operationalcontributionwastopromotetheuseofpartnershipsasagenericprinciple.That
prescription(althoughsoundlybased)cannotbeequatedwiththesophisticatedsetoftasks
andstrategiesthatweareseeingdeployed.Thisisaratherhumblingobservation.It
suggeststhatRIUexperimentsaremorelikebuyingatickettowatchashowthantheyare
aboutsettingupthebiggestshowintown.Thisisnotatrivialpointasitsuggeststhatpolicy
support(forexample,supportingRIUlikeprogrammes)needstochangefundamentally.Itis
nolongeraboutcreatingtheseinnovationtrajectoriesbutlookingathowbesttosupport
suchongoingthreadsoflearning,entrepreneurship,innovationandchangeinrelevant
areas.ThisiswhereRIUhasbeenmoresuccessful,bylaterbringinginbusinessskillstohelp
projectswhenthishasemergedasaratelimitingstepofexpertise.But,astheprojects
themselvesdemonstrate,thereisaverywidesetofinnovationtasksneeded.Andwealso
seegaps:forexample,visioningandforesightexercisesequallyimportantformanaging
changeindynamicmarketsastheyareinthefaceofunpredictableclimatechange.The
researchofRIUneedstogetamuchbetterunderstandingofhowalltheseinnovation
supportactivitiescanbestbeorganisedandprovidedfor(whopays,whoprovides).
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI46
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
REFERENCES
Clark,N.G.,Hall,A.J.,RasheedSulaimanV.,GuruNaik(2003).“ResearchasCapacity
Building:TheCaseofanNGOFacilitatedPostHarvestInnovationSystemforthe
HimalayanHills”.WorldDevelopmentVol.31,No.11,pp.18451863.
Engel,P.andSalomon,M.(2003).FacilitatingInnovationforDevelopment:ARAAKS
ResourceBox.KoninklijkInstituutvoordeTropen(KIT):Amsterdam.
Hall,A.(2009).“EmbeddingResearchinSociety:DevelopmentAssistanceOptionsfor
SupportingAgriculturalInnovationinaGlobalKnowledgeEconomy”.International
JournalofTechnologyManagementandSustainableDevelopment.Vol8,Issue3,pp.
221236.
Hall,A.J.(2005).“CapacityDevelopmentforAgriculturalBiotechnologyinDeveloping
Countries:AnInnovationSystemsViewofWhatItIsandHowtoDevelopIt”.Journal
ofInternationalDevelopment,Vol.17,No.5,pp611630.
Hall,A.,Dijkman,J.andSulaiman,R.V.(2010).“ResearchIntoUse:Investigatingthe
RelationshipbetweenAgriculturalResearchandInnovation”.RIUDiscussionPaper
Series#201001,July2010,ResearchIntoUse:UK.
Hall,AandN.Clark(2010).“WhatdoComplexAdaptiveSystemsLookLikeandwhatarethe
ImplicationsforInnovationPolicy?”JournalofInternationalDevelopment.Vol.22,
Issue3,pp.308324.
Hall,A.J.andN.Clark(1995).“CopingwithChange,ComplexityandDiversityinAgriculture:
ThecaseofRhizobiumInoculantsinThailand”.WorldDevelopment,Vol.23.,No.9,
pp.16011614.
Howells,J.(2006).Intermediationandtheroleofintermediariesininnovation.Research
Policy,35,715728.
EkinKeskin,MirjamSteglich,JeroenDijkman&AndyHall(2008)."PrivateCapacityand
PublicFailure:ContoursofLivestockInnovationResponseCapacityinKenya."UNU
MERITWorkingPaperSeries#2008068,UnitedNationsUniversityMaastricht
EconomicandsocialResearchandtrainingcentreonInnovationandTechnology:
Maastricht,TheNetherlands.
Klerkx,L.,&Leeuwis,C.(2009).Establishmentandembeddingofinnovationbrokersat
differentinnovationsystemlevels:InsightsfromtheDutchagriculturalsector.
TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,76(6)849‐860.
Klerkx,L.andLeeuwis,C.(2008).“MatchingDemandandSupplyintheAgricultural
KnowledgeInfrastructure:ExperiencewithInnovationIntermediaries”,FoodPolicy,
33[3],260276.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI47
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Kristjanson,P.,Reid,R.S.,Dickson,N.,Clark,W.C.,Romney,D.,Puskur,R.,etal.(2009).
Linkinginternationalagriculturalresearchknowledgewithactionforsustainable
development.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences,inpress.
Leeuwis,C.andHall,A.(2010).“FacingtheChallengesofClimateChangeandFoodSecurity:
TheRoleofResearch,ExtensionandCommunicationInstitutions.Report
CommissionedbytheResearchandExtensionBranchoftheUnitedNationsFood
andAgricultureOrganization,October2010,FAO:Rome.
Reddy,Vamsidhar,T.S(2010).ScalingUptheDecentralisedSeedProduction(DSP)
ApproachinBangladesh.DraftReportforRIU.
VamsidharReddy,T.S.,AndyHallandRasheedSulaiman,V.(2010).“NewOrganisationaland
InstitutionalVehiclesforManagingInnovationinSouthAsia:OpportunitiesforUsing
ResearchforTechnicalChangeandSocialGain”.RIUDiscussionPaperSeries#2010
07,October2010,ResearchIntoUse:UK.
Richards,P.(1989).Agricultureasaperformance.InR.Chambers,A.PaceyandL.Thrupp
(Eds.),FarmerFirst:FarmerInnovationandAgriculturalResearch.London:
IntermediateTechnology,pp.3942.
Rivera,WilliamM.andRasheedSulaimanV.(2009).“Extension:ObjectofReform,Engine
forInnovation”,OutlookonAgriculture,Vol.38,No.3,pp.267273,September2009.
C.ShambuPrasad(2005).ScienceandTechnologyinCivilSociety:InnovationTrajectoryof
SpirulinaAlgalTechnology.EconomicandPoliticalWeekly,October1,2005,pp.
43634372.
Ugbe,UtiangP.(2010).“WhatDoesInnovationSmellLike?AConceptualFrameworkfor
AnalysingandEvaluatingDFIDRIUExperimentsinBrokeringAgriculturalInnovation
andDevelopment”.RIUDiscussionPaperSeries#201010,November2010,Research
IntoUse:UK.
WorldBank(2006).EnhancingAgriculturalInnovation:HowtogobeyondtheStrengthening
ofResearchSystems.EconomicSectorWorkReport.TheWorldBank:Washington,
DC,pp.149.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI48
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
APPENDIX 1: THE SOUTH ASIA PROJECT PORTFOLIO
ThefollowingprovidesabriefdescriptionoftheSouthAsiaprojects:
Cluster1:ParticipatoryCropImprovementinAsia
(i)ImprovingLivelihoodsinSouthAsiathroughSustainedAccesstoNewTechnologiesin
RainfedAgriculture(India)
Thisinitiative,ledbytheCentreforAridZoneStudies(CAZS),Bangor,UK,focuseson
promotingtheuptakeofuplandvarietiesdevelopedthroughParticipatoryCrop
ImprovementinCentralandEasternIndia.ItpartnerswithtwoNGOsnamely,Gramin
VikasTrust(GVT)andCatholicReliefServices(CRS)todisseminatetheseseedswidely.It
focusesonstrengtheningthecapacityofseedproducergroups,withthemainmechanism
deployedbeingthegraincashseedbank.Theinitiativeisnowplanningtosetupaproducer
companytocommerciallyproduceandmarketqualityseedevolvedthroughParticipatory
CropImprovement.
(ii)PovertyReductionthroughCropIntensificationintoRiceFallowsinNepal
ThisinitiativeledbytheForumforRuralWelfareandAgriculturalReformforDevelopment
(Forward)anNGOinNepalfocusesonpromotingriceandlegumeseedsdeveloped
throughParticipatoryCropImprovementbystrengtheningthecapacityofcommunitybased
seedproducergroupstoproducetheseseedsandthendisseminatingtheseseedsassmall
kits.Inthisproject,itpartnerswithanotherNGOLocalInitiativesforBiodiversity
ResearchandDevelopment(LiBird)andCAZS,Bangor.Forwardhasnowsetupaseed
companycalledGlobalAgritechNepalPrivateLimited(GATE)toproduceandmarketthese
seeds.
(iii)NewRiceandLegumeseedfromClientOrientedBreeding(Nepal)
TheNGOLiBirdleadsthisinitiativeincollaborationwithForwardandCAZS.Italsohas
similarobjectives,suchasstrengtheningcommunitybasedseedproducersandachieving
thewiderdisseminationofseedsdevelopedthroughParticipatoryCropImprovementas
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI49
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
seedkits.LiBirdhasalsoestablishedaseedcompany,calledtheAnmolbiuSeedCompany
PrivateLimited,toproduceandmarketqualityseedsofriceandothercropsproduced.
Cluster2:ValueChainInnovation
(i)LinkingFarmerswithMarketsforRuralProsperity
Thisinitiative,ledbyInternationalDevelopmentEnterprises(IDE)inNepal,Vietnamand
Cambodia,isaboutbuildingandstrengtheninglinkagesandpartnershipsamongmarket
chainactorsthroughthepromotionoftheParticipatoryMarketChainApproach(PMCA)12.
InNepaltheprojectisfocusingonbuildingthecapacityofmarketplanningcommitteesand
developingtrustamongvariousactorsintheexistingvaluechain,includingthe
managementofcollectioncentres,farmersandtraders.
(ii)CoalitiontoDiversityIncomethroughUnderUtilisedCrops
TheInternationalCentreforUnderutilisedCrops(ICUC)ispilotingthismultipronged
approachinIndiaandVietnamtopromoteunderusedcropsbysupportingcommunity
servicesforproduction,postharvestandmarketingofunderusedcropsandimproving
accesstothemarketfortheruralpoor.InIndiaitispartneringwiththeNGOBharatiyaAgro
IndustriesFoundation(BAIF)andinVietnamwiththeCentreforAgrarianSystemsResearch
andDevelopment(CASRAD)andtheFruitandVegetablesResearchInstitute(FAVRI),two
nationalresearchcentres.
(iii)DevelopingFishSeedValueChaininBangladesh
Thisinitiative,ledbytheNGORangpurDinajpurRuralServices(RDRS)inBangladesh,is
aboutdevelopingafishseedvaluechain(broodfishproducers,fingerlingtradersandtable
fishgrowers)bycreatingaroleforsmallholdersasintermediaryproducersandthereby
enhancingtheavailabilityandqualityoffishseed.WorldFishCenterandInternational
DevelopmentEnterprisesarepartnersinthisinitiative.
12 ThePMCAisaresearchanddevelopmentapproachforfosteringpropoor,marketledinnovationincommoditychains,
throughactiveparticipationofprivateandpublicmarketchainactors.CIP'sPapaAndinaInitiative
(http://papandina.cip.cgiar.org)andpartnersbegantodevelopPMCAin2001asameanstoreduceruralpovertyinthe
Andesbylinkingsmallfarmerstonewmarketopportunities.ThePMCAbuiltonthe"RapidAppraisalofAgricultural
KnowledgeSystems"(RAAKS)whichstimulatesnetworkingforinnovation(EngelandSalomon,2003).
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI50
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
Cluster3:InnovationinNaturalResourceManagement
(i)ReducingPovertythroughInnovationSystemsinForestry
Thisinitiative,ledbyForestActionapolicythinktankNGOinNepalfocuseson
promotinginnovationsininternalgroupgovernance(visioning,hamletbasedplanning,
decisionmakingandselfmonitoring)amongcommunityforestusergroupsandintroducing
activeforestmanagementandsustainableharvestingtechnologies,includingenterprise
development.Toimplementthisinitiative,itpartnerswithFECOFUN(Federationof
CommunityForestUsers,Nepal),NEHHPA(NepalHerbsandHerbalProductsAssociation)
andtheNepalForumofEnvironmentalJournalists(NEEFJ).
(ii)ScalingupIFMthroughAdaptiveLearningNetworks
TheBangladeshEnvironmentalLawyersAssociation(BELA)isleadingthisinitiativein
collaborationwiththeFloodHazardResearchCentre(MiddlesexUniversity,UK).Itfocuses
onpromotinginnovationsinmanagingfloodplainsinBangladesh.Thisapproach,called
IntegratedFloodplainManagement(IFM),involvesparticipatoryactionplandevelopment,
adaptivelearningamongstakeholders,developmentandcomplianceofrightsand
developingalegalframeworkforcommunitybasedmanagementoffloodplainresources
andresourcemanagementforfisheriesandcropproduction.
Others
(i)PromotingSustainableLivelihoodDevelopment(RojiRoti)
ThisprojectattemptstoreachtheultrapoorinNorthernandEasternIndiathroughforming
groupsofpoorwomenandestablishingasustainableruralsupportdeliverysystemto
supportthepoorintheireffortstoimprovetheirlivelihoods.Thisapproach,calledthe
‘dialecticapproach’bytheprojectteam,reliesongroupsavingasastartingpoint,whichis
thenfollowedbyaccesstomicrofinanceandlinkstoinputs,technicalexpertiseand
insurance.ThisprojectisledbyGYAssociatedLtd.(GYA),aUKbasedconsultingcompany,in
collaborationwithaBiharbasedNGOCPSL(CentreforPromotingSustainableLivelihoods),
andtheICAR(IndianCouncilforAgriculturalResearch)researchcentreinPatna,India.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI51
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
(ii)RatManagementforRuralCommunities
ThisisaninitiativethatusesatransferoftechnologyapproachtocontrolratsinBangladesh.
ItinvolvestrainingruralcommunitiesandimplementingagenciesmainlyNGOsandother
extensionagentsoncommunityfocusedandEcologicallyBasedRodentManagement
(EBRM),allthewhileproducinganddistributingimprovedrattraps.Theinitiativeisledby
AIDComilla,anNGOinBangladesh,incollaborationwiththeBangladeshAgricultural
ResearchInstitute(BARI),theBangladeshDepartmentofAgriculturalExtension(DAE)and
theBangladeshNaturalResourcesInstitute.
(iii)ProSCABorPromotingSustainableCoastalAquacultureinBangladesh
Thisisaninitiativefordisseminationof5coastalfisheriestechnologies(crabfattening,
molluscsculture,seaweedculture,improvedfishicingandproductionofpesticidefreedry
fish)throughtrainingandenterprisepromotion.ThisinitiativeisledbytheBangladesh
FisheriesResearchForum(BFRF),aprofessionalallianceofresearchersandpractitioners
involvedinresearch,developmentandcommercialisationofthefisheriessectorin
Bangladesh.Themaintasksinvolvedinthisinitiativeare:training,enterprisepromotionand
establishinglinkstoinputandoutputmarkets.
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI52
DISCUSSIONPAPER11:AFRAMEWORKANDEARLYFINDINGSFROMRIUINSOUTHASIA
THERIUDISCUSSIONPAPERSERIES
(Availablefordownloadatwww.researchintouse.com)
201001ResearchIntoUse:InvestigatingtheRelationshipBetweenAgricultural
ResearchandInnovation
ByAndyHall,JeroenDijkmanandRasheedSulaimanV.
201002Bottomup,Bottomline:DevelopmentRelevantEnterprisesinEastAfricaand
theirSignificanceforAgriculturalInnovation
ByAndyHall,NormanClarkandAndyFrost
201003InnovationSystems,EconomicSystems,ComplexityandDevelopmentPolicy
ByNormanClark
201004PuttingResearchIntoUse:AMarketFailureApproach
ByNormanClarkandIanMaudlin
201005ItMayTakeALittleWhile..:InsightsonAgriculturalResearchforInnovation
andDevelopmentinNigeria
ByUtiangP.Ugbe
201006GenderandAgriculturalInnovation:RevisitingtheDebateThroughan
InnovationSystemsPerspective
ByAnnKingiri
201007NewOrganisationalandInstitutionalVehiclesforManagingInnovationin
SouthAsia:OpportunitiesforUsingResearchforTechnicalChangeandSocial
Gain
ByT.S.VamsidharReddy,AndyHallandRasheedSulaimanV.
201008TheInnovationTrajectoryofSleepingSicknessControlinUganda:Research
KnowledgeinitsContext
ByJohnMorton
201009AfricaMatters:EmergingLessonsfromtheRIUCountryProgrammes
ByJeroenDijkman
201010WhatDoesInnovationSmellLike?AConceptualFrameworkforAnalysingand
EvaluatingDFIDRIUExperimentsinBrokeringAgriculturalInnovationand
Development
ByUtiangP.Ugbe
201011StudyingRuralInnovationManagement:AFrameworkandEarlyFindings
fromRIUinSouthAsia
ByRasheedSulaimanV.,AndyHall,VamsidharReddyT.S.andKumudaDorai
ResearchIntoUseRASHEEDSULAIMANV,ANDYHALL,VAMSIDHARREDDY,T.S.ANDKUMUDADORAI53
... This paper explores how EAS should be organized to support the upscaling of CSA, and approaches the task by drawing lessons for EAS from four successful cases where this has been done. The paper builds upon and uses the Innovation Management Framework (Sulaiman et al., 2010), which identifies three elements that are critical for innovation: functions, actions and tools. Innovation in this context refers to the process by which new knowledge is generated, adapted, disseminated and adopted by a large number of stakeholders. ...
... Some call it "boundary work" (Kristjanson et al., 2009); others refer to it as "intermediation" (Howells, 2006;Klerkx and Leeuwis, 2008) and, more recently, the term "innovation brokerage" has been used (Klerkx and Leeuwis, 2009). Sulaiman et al. (2010) explain that innovation involves a wide range of functions, activities and tools, and is delivered by several agencies operating through platforms, alliances or partnerships, whose work can be collectively referred to as "Innovation Management". While facilitating access to technology is important for putting new knowledge into wider use, access really has value only when it is combined with other elements of the Innovation Management process, such as the building of networks, the organization of producers, the communication of research needs, conflict mediation, the facilitation of access to credit, inputs and output services, the convening of innovation platforms, advocacy for policy change, and negotiations and agreements leading to other changes in practice and action (Table 1). ...
... While facilitating access to technology is important for putting new knowledge into wider use, access really has value only when it is combined with other elements of the Innovation Management process, such as the building of networks, the organization of producers, the communication of research needs, conflict mediation, the facilitation of access to credit, inputs and output services, the convening of innovation platforms, advocacy for policy change, and negotiations and agreements leading to other changes in practice and action (Table 1). Sulaiman et al., 2010 In this study, we used the Innovation Management Framework shown above to explore the experiences of upscaling CSA practices and to learn how EAS can be leveraged for upscaling purposes. The analytical approach underpinning our work highlights several important points that need to be borne in mind: ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
This paper explores how EAS should be organized to support the upscaling of CSA, and approaches the task by drawing lessons for EAS from four successful cases where this has been done. The paper builds upon and uses the Innovation Management Framework (Sulaiman et al., 2010), which identifies three elements that are critical for innovation: functions, actions and tools.
... For managers can be recommended to implement and use the system of self-evaluation of innovation processes in company [37]. Sulaiman et al. (2010) [38] thoroughly dealt with the issue of innovation management in the Asian environment. This study aimed to map the experience of the RIU Asia projects and drew out the main innovation management tactics being observed while laying the groundwork for further research on this topic. ...
... For managers can be recommended to implement and use the system of self-evaluation of innovation processes in company [37]. Sulaiman et al. (2010) [38] thoroughly dealt with the issue of innovation management in the Asian environment. This study aimed to map the experience of the RIU Asia projects and drew out the main innovation management tactics being observed while laying the groundwork for further research on this topic. ...
Article
Full-text available
The major purpose of this paper is to determine the opportunities and challenges relating to successful innovation management in SMEs in German and Slovakia. The objective and the subjective stances to research comprise three interlinking philosophies: epistemology, ontology and axiology. For this study the major design elements are the explanatory and the exploratory approaches and a case study is the selected research strategy. In order to answer the research problem, numerical and textual data is gathered. The empirical research studies revealed significant cultural influence on innovation management and related organisational change associated with it. It also highlighted substantial differences between success and failure factors in SMEs and large companies and there were implications that formal innovation management was less important from SMEs than for large companies. This research identified key innovation management success factors for SMEs and made three new findings, which add to the current knowledge: innovation circles were an effective innovation management approach to generating and developing ideas and getting innovation to market quickly; government agencies that encourage firms to collaborate effectively enhance the level and success of innovation; SMEs and large companies have distinctly different rankings of barriers to innovation and small and micro firms are more effective in original product innovation and speed to market than medium sized companies.
... No obstante, lograr que el nivel de articulación entre los intermediarios privados y públicos sea lo suficientemente alto para generar las alianzas necesarias y estimular un mayor alcance en la gestión es otro de los principales desafíos (Danse y Vellema, 2006). Para países en desarrollo, la escasa capacidad de coordinación con intermediarios privados que presentan las organizaciones agropecuarias de carácter público, tiene efectos negativos en la integración de los productores locales a las agrocadenas, afectando: el grado de organización y asociatividad en contextos de ruralidad y/o pobreza; la participación de actores institucionales en el desarrollo de acciones colectivas; la promoción de plataformas locales para intercambiar información y conocimiento; la generación de nuevo aprendizaje siguiendo enfoques interactivos; y la incorporación de la cosmovisión local en el diseño y ejecución de actividades para fomentar capacidades productivas y empresariales (Knickel et al., 2009;Sulaiman et al., 2010). ...
Chapter
El objetivo de esta investigación es analizar las interacciones entre los actores que participan en procesos de innovación y aprendizaje vinculados a la cadena agroalimentaria de la papa en Costa Rica. Se pretende dar respuesta a dos preguntas centrales: ¿Qué tipo y grado de interacción se establece entre las organizaciones intermediarias de la innovación y el aprendizaje y las organizaciones locales de productores? y ¿De qué forma son incorporados los factores organizacionales y socioculturales a los procesos de gestión del aprendizaje y cómo influye esto en la construcción de gobernanza en la agrocadena? Para conseguirlo, se discuten los efectos de esas interacciones en la construcción de mecanismos de gobernanza para promover dinámicas de fomento agropecuario y comercial. Se utilizan elementos conceptuales del enfoque de los Sistemas de Innovación Agropecuaria (AIS, por sus siglas en inglés), para estudiar a lasorganizaciones intermediarias de innovación que participan en acciones colectivas orientadas a generar procesos de aprendizaje y conocimiento. Asimismo, el trabajo empírico de la investigación se realizó con la Cooperativa Agropecuaria y de Servicios Múltiples de Buenos Aires de Pacayas R. L. (Coopebaires R. L.), organización conformada por cerca de 270 asociados, incluidos 120 productores de papa del cantón de Alvarado, ubicado en la zona noreste de la provincia de Cartago, en Costa Rica. Como parte de la metodología, se realizó un análisis de redes sociales, así como entrevistas semiestructuradas a expertos y revisión documental. El texto está estructurado en ocho apartados. Después de la introducción, se presenta el marco teórico, para entrar al caso de estudio que ocupa la presente investigación. Después, se expone la metodología, para seguir con un análisis de la red social de Coopebaires R. L. En el seis, se explican los factores organizacionales y socioculturales que influyen en la construcción de gobernanza; y en el siete, la gestión del aprendizaje y competitividad en la cadena de la papa. Finalmente; se otorgan al lector las conclusiones.
... Facilitation enhances interaction and relationships of individuals, organizations, and their social, cultural and political structures through a process of network building, social learning and negotiation ( Leeuwis and aarts, 2011). It is vital to enabling the interaction of multiple actors, foster synergy by managing these interactions linking people and resources and enhancing their ability to make collective decisions and to implement them (pyburn and Woodhill, 2014;Sulaiman et al., 2010). Specialized and skilled individuals act as systemic intermediaries, facilitators or brokers among multiple, complex relationships ( ). ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
The draft Common Framework for Capacity Development of Agricultural Innovation Systems that is here presented is a first attempt to respond to these problems. The draft is the result of the work of a group of consultants, and the TAP Secretariat with contributions from the TAP CD Expert Group under the guidance of the TAP Global Task Force, who also endorsed the draft document. The EU-funded CDAIS project is now validating the draft at field level in eight pilot countries (Angola, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Honduras, Laos, and Rwanda). The discussion will be soon widened to a larger community of scientists, practitioners, development agencies, social society representatives, and policy makers through electronic conferences and policy dialogues. We are confident that the wide involvement of Capacity Development and of Agriculture Innovation Systems’ actors will lead to a large consensus, prerequisite for the broad adoption of the Common Framework.
Book
Full-text available
This book is an edited volume of chapters pertaining to 'Effective Extension Methods for Upscaling and Outscaling of Wheat and Barley Production Technologies'
Chapter
Full-text available
Indian agriculture post-Green Revolution has become intensive in terms of technological innovations and interventions. Inter alia, the success witnessed through the mass adoption of Green Revolution technologies is attributed to the extension methods and approaches used during the period. Over time, the extension methods have evolved and transformed a lot in terms of tools used and stakeholder needs. In the era of digital and smart agriculture, the conventional extension approaches may not be sufficient to scale the latest crop production and protection technologies to benefit the multitude clientele. In the context, the chapter highlights the modern extension tools and approaches for demand-driven technology transfer in wheat and barley.
Method
Full-text available
Based on the prioritised capacity needs and recommendations from the Department of Agriculture and Farmers’ Empowerment (Government of Odisha), CRISP and IRRI have developed this module on facilitation for development. It was pilot tested in a Training of Trainers Workshop organised during 09-10 January 2020, at the Institute on Management of Agricultural Extension (IMAGE), Bhubaneswar, Odisha.
Technical Report
Full-text available
The draft Common Framework for Capacity Development of Agricultural Innovation Systems that is here presented is a first attempt to respond to these problems. The draft is the result of the work of a group of consultants, and the TAP Secretariat with contributions from the TAP CD Expert Group under the guidance of the TAP Global Task Force, who also endorsed the draft document. The EU-funded CDAIS project is now validating the draft at field level in eight pilot countries (Angola, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Honduras, Laos, and Rwanda). The discussion will be soon widened to a larger community of scientists, practitioners, development agencies, social society representatives, and policy makers through electronic conferences and policy dialogues. We are confident that the wide involvement of Capacity Development and of Agriculture Innovation Systems’ actors will lead to a large consensus, prerequisite for the broad adoption of the Common Framework.
Article
Full-text available
RAAKS, the rapid (or relaxed) appraisal of agricultural knowledge systems, was developed by Paul Engel, Monique Salomon and others at the Department for Communication and Innovation Studies of Wageningen University, on the basis of field work done by national researchers and practitioners in over 25 countries in Latin America, Africa, Asia, Europe and Australia. RAAKS has been adapted and widely used to inspire innovative capacity development and social learning processes at the community level among rural organisations and institutions and, more recently, in agricultural market chains. The RAAKS methodology and some field experiences were originally published in 1997. In 2002 RAAKS was republished without revision and it is now again out of print.
Article
Full-text available
The accelerated pace of environmental, social and techno-logical change has major implications for the poor and their development prospects. In an environment wherein agricultural research centres have to perform broader roles beyond increasing food supplies, the greater challenge lies in the trans-formation of agricultural research centres into learning organisations, more in touch with field realities and better able to respond to feedback and in this institutional rather than tech-nological innovations are likely to play a larger role. Unfortu-nately the traditional transfer-of-technology approach to agricul-tural research that dominates the institutional arrangement acts as barriers to learning. A more fruitful approach would be to recognise the multiple sources of innovation and look for more client-responsive scientific practices. The silence of the agricul-tural establishment to the recent pesticides in aerated drinks controversy is a case in point and indicates a complacent view arising out of a linear view of innovation that separates research from extension and thereby externalises these problems as fail-ures of delivery or extension mechanisms instead of pointers to a more systemic failure in the practice of science. 1 Acknowledging the multiple sources of innovation, this paper, an empirical study of agro-processing innovation by a civil society organisation, seeks to further this process of institutional learning and change in agricultural research in India. It looks at the work of the Murugappa Chettiar Research Centre (MCRC), a civil society organisation that rooted spirulina algal technology in India. It profiles the active involvement of a non-governmental organisation in all aspects of the innovation chain – development of the scientific idea (invention), translating that idea into a commercial proposition (innovation) and extension of the tech-nology both into the market and rural communities (diffusion). Rather than see this initiative as an isolated case of individual genius, this paper seeks to place the efforts of the MCRC as part of a larger narrative on science in civil society that has been largely under-reported both within studies on science and the general civil society literature. It explores the nature of civil society initiatives in science in India and examines their difference vis-à-vis the state and the market in terms of an explicit pro-poor focus in research. It investigates possible lessons for agricultural research in India through an examination of research praxis of an alternative paradigm of learning and innovation in civil society that could inform research project design, research management and practice. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part outlines the context for the study within three frames – a sectoral under-standing of the post-harvest innovations context in India, the historical and social context of research by civil society in India, and finally spirulina as a site for a biotechnological application with a pro-poor focus that has escaped recent biotechnology debates surrounding golden rice as the nutritional alternative in the tropics. The second part of the study maps the various phases of the spirulina algal technology innovation system in India. It seeks to situate the work of the research centre within existing work on algal technology in India highlighting points of departure in research practice. It also explores the nature of partnership in the various phases and the changing role of the main actors in the system. In Part III the research culture of MCRC is examined through an analysis of the technical and non-technical writings by research staff for insights into the conceptualisation of research and deve-lopment, formation of partnerships, problem definition with an emphasis on innovation and the practice of enabling organisational learning. This is followed by an exploration into the implications of the case for agricultural research in India. It will also explicate how an innovation system's framework can enable new perspec-tives that can guide research and institutional learning for future activities, especially, in identifying how new players like the agricultural research establishment can enter the system and take it further. It thereby seeks to demonstrate that the case is not just about spirulina or MCRC, but also about a new framework of closer interaction between formal and not so formal science, science by the state and science by civil society.
Article
Full-text available
This paper explores the use of complex adaptive systems theory in development policy analysis using a case study drawn from recent events in Uganda. It documents the changes that took place in the farming system in Soroti district during an outbreak of African cassava mosaic virus disease (ACMVD) and the subsequent decline in cassava production—the main staple food in the area. Resultant adaptation impacts are analysed across cropping, biological, economic and social systems each of which operate as an interlinked sub-systems. The policy implications of this story suggest a policy agenda that recognises adaptation capacity as the life blood of complex adaptive systems. Since these types of system are found in all realms of human activity, it follows that strengthening this capacity is a key developmental priority that requires linking together new configurations of actors and resources to tackle an ever changing set of contexts. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Article
Extension activities are being pulled in many directions, and are being called on to respond more effectively to the needs of farmers to produce and to forge links with markets. In the USA, for example, State Cooperative Extension Services have a variety of purposes in urban areas and operate in cooperation with other government agencies. Thus extension services, while concentrating on production agriculture, especially via privatized and private extension-type service companies, are simultaneously broadening out to include new purposes and a new clientele. While extension's role is straightforward in contract farming and other commercial ventures, such is not necessarily the case with public sector extension. Its structure, organization and operating system may differ from country to country, even from region to region. Nonetheless, whether in the private or public sector, a major concern for extension is to operate in the context of agricultural innovation systems (AIS) so that new knowledge is applied and used. A key objective in reforming extension, as argued in this paper, is to make it a better instrument, or engine, for the promotion of innovation, the dissemination of knowledge and the facilitation of development.
Article
This paper reviews a recent donor-funded project concerning the introduction of post-harvest technology to poor hill farmers in India. Rather than conform to conventional development aid projects of either a “research” or an “interventionist” nature, it combines both approaches in a research-action program, which has more in common with a business development approach than a formal social science one. An important conclusion is that the work (and apparent success) of the project is consistent with an understanding of development that emphasizes the importance of innovation systems. It is also an example of the importance of continuous learning and of institutional change. In contrast to much conventional development aid, it is an interesting example of how projects can actually lead to long-term sustainable changes that survive the withdrawal of the donor, having built capacity that truly means self-sufficiency. It is therefore an approach that deserves careful consideration on the part of all participants in international development.
Article
In recent years the accepted organizational pattern of relations between science and production has begun increasingly to be called in question. In the area of peasant agriculture, this generally takes the form of a critique of a system based upon centralized research institutes and hierarchically administered extension agencies. This paper explores this theme by means of an empirical study of the impact of rhizobium inoculant technology on selected areas of peasant agriculture in Thailand. The paper shows that this (core) scientifically derived technology has had widely different effects in different locations, and that these involve complex interactions with different biological systems. The evidence suggests that there are independent knowledge systems possessed by farmers who combine this knowledge innovatively with the core technology to produce outcomes that vary over time and space. The case, in common with many others, indicates also that core scientists are reluctant to accept technological complexity, preferring instead to leave responsibility for application to the extension system, even when it is clear that more research may be necessary.
Article
In the systems perspective on innovation, co-operation between several different types of actors is seen as key to successful innovation. Due to the existence of several gaps that hinder such effective co-operation, the scientific and policy literature persistently points at the need for intermediary organizations to fulfill bridging and brokerage roles. This paper aims to provide an overview of the insights from the literature on such `innovation brokers¿, and to contribute to the literature by distilling lines of enquiry and providing insights on one of the lines identified. Taking as an empirical basis experiences with different types of innovation brokers that have emerged in the Dutch agricultural sector, it identifies a number of tensions with regard to the establishment and embedding of such organizations. The paper indicates that, despite being perceived to have a catalyzing effect on innovation, innovation brokers have difficulty in becoming embedded as their clients and/or financiers find it difficult to grasp the nature and value of their activities
Article
The privatization of agricultural research and extension establishments worldwide has led to the development of a market for services designed to support agricultural innovation. However, due to market and systemic failures, both supply side and demand side parties in this market have experienced constraints in effecting transactions and establishing the necessary relationships to engage in demand-driven innovation processes. To mitigate these constraints, a field of intermediary organizations has emerged to assist agricultural entrepreneurs to articulate demand, forge linkages with those that can provide innovation support services, and manage innovation processes. This article aims to give an overview of the different kinds of the so-called innovation intermediaries that have emerged in The Netherlands and to report on their contributions and the tensions that are being experienced with regard to their functioning. The article concludes with a discussion in which it is argued that the state should play a role as a `market facilitator¿, by funding such innovation intermediaries.
Article
There are divergent views on what capacity development might mean in relation to agricultural biotechnology. The core of this debate is whether this should involve the development of human capital and research infrastructure, or whether it should encompass a wider range of activities which also include developing the capacity to use knowledge productively. This paper uses the innovation systems concept to shed light on this discussion, arguing that it is innovation capacity rather than science and technology capacity that has to be developed. It then presents six examples of different capacity development approaches. It concludes by suggesting that policy needs to take a multidimensional approach to capacity development in line with innovation systems perspective. But it also argues that policy needs to recognise the need to develop the capacity of diversity of innovation systems and that a key part of the capacity development task is to bring about the integration of these different systems at strategic points in time. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.