ArticlePDF Available

Tesla: A Successful Entrepreneurship Strategy

Authors:

Abstract

This article is about Tesla, Inc., which was founded in 2003 by a group of engineers in Silicon Valley whose objective was to create zero-emission electric cars better than gasoline automobiles and to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport by providing compelling, mass-market electric cars as soon as possible. Tesla is not just an automaker. It is also a technology company with a focus on energy innovation. Its CEO is American's most well-known entrepreneur, Elton Musk.
Tesla: A Successful Entrepreneurship Strategy
By Khamis M. Bilbeisi and Moulare Kesse
Peer Reviewed
Dr. Khamis Bilbeisi, a Professor of Accounting at Clayton State
University, has over 30 years’ experience teaching a variety courses
in accounting and is involved with forensic and investigative
accounting. He is a member the American College of Forensic
Examiners Institute, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, and
the Georgia Society of CPAs. He is the author of numerous
publications.
Moulare Kesse is an Adjunct Instructor at Clayton State University.
Abstract
This article is about Tesla, Inc., which was founded in 2003 by a group of engineers
in Silicon Valley whose objective was to create zero-emission electric cars better than
gasoline automobiles and to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport by providing
compelling, mass-market electric cars as soon as possible. Tesla is not just an
automaker. It is also a technology company with a focus on energy innovation. Its CEO
is American’s most well-known entrepreneur, Elton Musk.
Introduction
The latest view of climate change and its devastating effect on the environment
has scientists, politicians, and the business community worried about the contribution of
human activities to the production of greenhouse gases such as the carbon dioxide
emitted by cars (Transportation’s Role in Climate Change, 2016). The Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which includes more than 1,300 scientists from the
United States and other countries, has forecasted a temperature rise of 2.5 to 10 degrees
Fahrenheit over the next century (The consequences of climate change, 2016).
Furthermore, the spectacular increase in the production of industrial output in China, just
like other industrial production centers such as Germany and the USA, has accelerated
the depletion of global oil reserves (The structure of China’s oil industry, 2016). The
explosion of industrial output is driven by the attempt to satisfy the voracious consumption
and the increasing demand for consumer goods around the world.
Rapid oil depletion has increased the call for renewable and diversified sources of
energy given the unsustainability of oil-dependent economic development. Hence, in
2014, a resolution by the UN General Assembly declared 2014-2024 the United Nations
Decade of Sustainable Energy for All (Sustainable development, 2016). Elton Musk, CEO
of Tesla, Inc. (formerly Tesla Motors) believes that in the future solar and wind farms can
provide electric power when the sun is not shining and when the wind is not blowing by
storing electricity generated when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing in new types
of batteries. He is encouraged by market readiness and public policies’ willingness to
explore alternative sources of energy.
Musk and his team claim that the owner of a small sedan being driven 15,000 miles
annually will spend an average of $6,957 on gasoline (Driving cost per mile, 2014). In
contrast, the owner of an electric car running the same annual mileage will spend $540
(Moloughney, 2016). In addition, an electric car’s maintenance cost is 35% less than for
a gasoline-powered car (Ingram, 2016). It is based on this analysis that electric-powered
vehicles became commercially viable.
Directly competing with Tesla is the Chevrolet Bolt. Other potential competing EVs
are in development. Currently Tesla has the high-end market to itself. One advantage of
EVs over vehicles with gasoline engines is the lack of a drive shaft that makes for a more
roomy interior.
South African native Musk, who studied economics and physics in college, is co-
founder, CEO, and product architect of Tesla; the founder, CEO and CTO of SpaceX; co-
founder and chairman of OpenAl; co-founder of Zip2; and founder of X.com which, after
merging with Confinity, took the name PayPal. (See interview with Musk at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKWPdJWuBQ in which he discusses the need for
and advantages of electric vehicles.)
Supply Chain Management Strategy
Tesla’s business model is different from that of most automobile manufacturing
companies because it owns the entire supply chain from manufacturing to distribution.
This strategy is driven by the ultimate goal of lowering manufacturing costs and costs of
goods sold, thereby assuring the business sustainability. Under the leadership of Musk,
the company unveiled its Model S following its very first model, the Roadster. Tesla is
now in the process of producing its latest models, Model X and Model 3, which, unlike its
previous models, target the mass market for electric vehicles. It is worth noting that
Tesla’s supply chain management strategy focuses on a long-term growth strategy
involving production, inventory management, and distribution.
Growth Strategy
Tesla’s growth strategy is mostly driven by the anticipated high demand for Model 3.
Hence, research and development costs rose to $81.5 million from $54.9 million a year
ago (Ramsey, 2016). Following the R&D budget increase of 48% from the first quarter
of 2013 to the first quarter of 2014, the company planned to grow R&D expenses for the
second quarter by 30% from the first quarter (Ramsey, 2016). The focus on research
and development in the company’s growth strategy involved the modification of the
existing assembly line to handle the production of two different models: Model S and
Model X (Crawford, 2016). In addition, its plant modification involved the development of
advanced computer programs for assembly robots (Crawford, 2016). The company’s
growth strategy was to increase production of the model S and to unveil its Model X in
2015 and Model 3 in 2017. This was in line with its production strategy and initiatives.
(See a documentary about Tesla at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncw4ISEU5ik .)
Production
Musk has promised to dramatically increase car production, expand Tesla’s
charging infrastructure to accommodate increasing the number of tesla cars on the road,
and conquer self-driving vehicles by 2020 (Thompson, 2016). In addition to making
electric cars, Musk also wants the company to produce the energy that power his
cars. (See how Tesla manufactures cars at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_lfxPI5ObM .)
Production level:
The company has expanded its manufacturing tentacles into Tilburg, the
Netherlands, where it has an assembly facility, and Lathrop, California, where it has a
specialized production plant (About Tesla, 2016). In November 2015 during the Baron
Funds investor conference Musk suggested that Tesla is on the way to become larger
than auto giants like General Motors, Volkswagen, and Toyota (Thompson, 2016).
Charging infrastructure:
With the ambition to have close to 500,000 Tesla cars on the road by 2018
(DeBord,2016), Musk aims to expand Tesla's supercharging network which currently
offers electric filling stations that are capable of charging a Tesla vehicle enough to give
it almost 200 miles of range in just 30 minutes (Thompson, 2016). During the Model 3
unveiling in March, Musk suggested that Tesla would double the number of its
superchargers worldwide from some 3,600 to more than 7,000 by 2018 (Thompson,
2016). Currently Tesla provides the only electric cars with an official range of more than
200 miles per charge.) Tesla’s supercharger network gives it a competitive advantage
over actual and potential competitors.
Autonomous driving:
Musk promises that his cars will be autonomous by 2018 (Thompson, 2016). The
company rolled out its semi-autonomous autopilot system at the end of October 2016.
Musk suggests a two-year timeline to achieve “level 4” autonomy in Tesla’s cars and also
adds that, while the technology may be there, the user may not get full access to it
because it is unlikely regulators will have laws in place by the time Tesla’s autonomous
cars are ready (Thompson, 2016).
Battery production:
One significant source of cost for Tesla cars is the lithium ion battery packs. Tesla
and key strategic partners including Panasonic have begun construction of a Gigafactory
in Nevada that will supply low cost lithium ion battery packs and facilitate the production
of a more affordable vehicle, Model 3 (About Tesla, 2016). By 2020, the Gigafactory is
expected to achieve an output of battery packs that can be used not only for cars but also
in stationary storage, helping to improve the reliability of the electrical grid, reduce energy
costs for businesses and residences, and provide a backup supply of power (About Tesla,
2016). Tesla estimates the factory will help reduce the cost of its batteries by as much as
30% once it is fully operational in 2020 (Thompson, 2016). While the record for
hypermiling in a Tesla is almost 500 miles, the official range of Tesla’s Model S is about
265 miles per charge, according to ratings by the Environmental Protection Agency
(Thompson, 2016). Musk claims that by 2020 Tesla will likely be able to make its cars
go as far as 745 miles per charge (Thompson, 2016).
Musk believes that it is likely that in the future electric vehicles will depend on
super-capacitors, rather than on batteries. Like batteries, super-capacitors store energy,
but they would be much more efficient at storing the massive amounts of energy needed
for non-mechanical braking and accelerating. (Electric cars accelerate more rapidly than
do gasoline-powered cars.)
Inventory Management
Tesla’s success in reducing costs was to minimize risk by keeping very little
inventory. Such inventory cost reduction was achieved by batch production after prepaid
orders were obtained. Its order-production strategy offers a few advantages. First,
customers waiting for their cars to be delivered can choose to further customize their cars.
Second, keeping little inventory allows the company to minimize the amount of capital
and risk tied up with storing excess inventory (Tao, 2016). Moreover, saving from avoiding
excess inventory can be redirected toward R&D to grow the company. Better inventory
management contributed over $30 million in cash and reduced logistic costs in the quarter
ended March 31, 2013 (Tao, 2016). Furthermore, sales for this quarter were up to $526
million, and direct savings from better inventory management was around 5.3% (Tao,
2016).
Distribution
Tesla chose to reject the traditional franchise-dealer sales model for the following
reasons: The company argued that selling to customers prevents unnecessary additional
costs. A report, published by Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, estimated that the
savings for customers in the direct-to-consumer model is around $2,225 for a $26,000
vehicle, or an 8.6% savings (Tao, 2016). Customers can view the cars in the showrooms
and complete orders at the showroom or online or on the phone and have the cars
delivered to them. Even though the wait time might not be always desirable, Tesla’s
revenue increase is reflective of customers’ willingness to trade a few months of waiting
time for an affordable and reliable electrical car. The company’s current success can be
attributed to its nonconventional supply chain management strategy.
Tesla’s Successes
Tesla’s engineers first designed a powertrain for a sports car named the Roadster.
Launched in 2008, the 2,400 Roadsters sold were on the road in more than 30 countries
(About Tesla, 2016). In 2012, Tesla launched Model S, and it was named Motor Trend’s
2013 Car of the Year (“About Tesla”, 2016). The delivery of Model S generated a revenue
increase of 11% to $618 million in the first quarter of 2014 compared to the first quarter
of 2013 (Tesla’s financial statements show the company’s rapid growth, 2014). As a
result of controlling costs through better supply chain management, Tesla had a 25%
gross profit margin. This is almost twice that of GM, which had a 13% gross profit margin
in 2013 (Tesla’s financial statements show the company’s rapid growth, 2014). The
encouraging revenue growth and the performance rating of Tesla’s Model S certainly
explain the production forecast of 55,000 cars: Model S (35,000) and Model X (20,000).
Tesla posted a quarterly profit in the third quarter of 2016 of $22 million. This was
the second time it posted a quarterly profit. It produced 80,000 cars in 2016) Driving its
2016 third quarter profit was improved sales of the Model S sedan and Model X sport-
utility vehicle, reduced spending, and selling pollution tax credits to other automobile
manufacturers. The price of the new version of the model S was $66,000. Purchasers of
full electric or plug-in hybrid cars may be eligible to receive up to a $7,500 federal tax
credit. At $2.3 billion, 2016 revenue was substantially above the previous year’s $936.8
million.
The Financial Times reports that “As of Mar 18, 2017, the consensus forecast
amongst 23 polled investment analysts covering Tesla Inc. advises investors to hold their
position in the company. This has been the consensus forecast since the sentiment of
investment analysts deteriorated on Aug 14, 2015 (consensus recommendation, 2017).
Tesla’s Challenges
It’s difficult to produce automobiles when you have never done so before. A unique
challenge for Tesla is vertical integration--owning and operating everything. Despite the
many challenges his company faces, Musk asserts that his EVs will soon be found in
millennials’ driveways as they switch from apartments to home ownership.
Tesla’s fund raising initiatives to gather capital to upgrade the production plant and
get it ready for the production forecast of 55,000 cars in 2015 proved to be more
challenging than anticipated. The initial plan to sell $500 million of stock was later revised
to $640 million as feasibility costs were increasing and cash reserve decreased
(Crawford, 2016). Furthermore, the heavy task of reprogramming the highly computerized
assembly robots needed more time for completion than planned (Young, 2015). As a
result of the need for additional capital and time to get the production plant ready, delivery
to customers had to be delayed for a few months. Consequently, Tesla announced the
reduction of its production forecast for 2015 from 55,000 to 50,000 (Young, 2015). This
reduction in production and delivery delay shook investors’ confidence and caused the
stock price to drop 12% (Crawford, 2016).
Musk has admitted he spent the first part of 2016 in production hell (DeBord, 2017).
Fortunately J. D. Powers found that Tesla’s quality problems with its expensive luxury
cars had not tarnished its brand image and sales because their owners view themselves
as pioneers who enjoy being early adopters of new technology (Murtha, 2017).
Conclusion
Tesla’s nonconventional supply chain management strategy to cut operation costs
and successfully deliver a reliable and affordable product rests on a short term goal of
product acceptance and a long term strategy for growth and profitability. The company’s
current challenges of funding and the technological feasibility of mass production is a
reminder that flooding the roads in America and around the globe with electric cars at
affordable prices is a daunting task that explains the failure of previous attempts. In 2006,
Musk asserted that "The strategy of Tesla is to enter at the high end of the market, where
customers are prepared to pay a premium, and then drive down market as fast as possible
to higher unit volume and lower prices with each successive model" (Musk, 2006).
Despite Tesla’s present challenges, the company’s current record of 400,000
reservations for the model 3 is not only a testament that Tesla cars have passed the test
of product acceptance, but is also a demonstration of the viability of Musk’s strategy since
it was put in place in 2006.
References
1. About Tesla. (2016). Tesla.com. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from
https://www.tesla.com/about#executives
2. Crawford, A. (2016). Tesla Lowers Production Forecast, Sells US$500m-plus
in Stock. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from
http://www.caradvice.com.au/374504/tesla-lowers-production-forecast-sells-
us500m-plus-in-stock/
3. Consensus recommendation. (2017). Retrieved 30 March 2017, from
https://markets.ft.com/data/equities/tearsheet/forecasts?s=TSLA:NSQ
4. Driving cost per mile. (2014). Retrieved 20 December 2016, from
http://newsroom.aaa.com/tag/driving-cost-per-mile/
5. DeBord, M. (2016). Elon Musk just made a totally mind-blowing change to
Tesla's strategy. Retrieved 2 March 2017, from
http://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-mind-blowing-change-strategy-2016-5
6. DeBord, M. (2017).Tesla's greatest hope for going mass market could present
a threat to its car factory. Retrieved 30 March 2017, from
http://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-gigafactory-problems-for-carmaking-
2017-1
7. Ingram, A. (2016). Electric Car Maintenance A Third Cheaper Than
Combustion Vehicles? Green Car Reports. Retrieved 20 December 2016, from
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1080925_electric-car-maintenance-a-
third-cheaper-than-combustion-vehicles
8. Lachnit, C. (2016). The True Cost of Powering an Electric Car. Edmunds.
Retrieved 15 December 2016, from https://www.edmunds.com/fuel-
economy/the-true-cost-of-powering-an-electric-car.html
9. Moloughney, T. (2016). How Much Does It Cost To Charge An Electric Car?
Retrieved 20 December 2016, from https://pluginamerica.org/how-much-does-
it-cost-charge-electric-car/
10. Musk, E. (2006). The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (just between you and
me). Retrieved 30 March 2017 from https://www.tesla.com/blog/secret-tesla-
motors-master-plan-just-between-you-and-me
11. Murtha, P. (2017). Tesla Owners Love Their Model S, Model X Vehicles,
Despite Problems. Retrieved 30 March 2017, from
http://www.jdpower.com/cars/articles/jd-power-studies/tesla-owners-love-their-
model-s-model-x-vehicles-despite-problems
12. Ohnsman, A. (2017) Tesla Plans Model 3 Electric Car Production from July --
And More Gigafactories. Retrieved 2 March 2017, from
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2017/02/22/tesla-plans-model-3-
electric-car-production-from-july-and-more-gigafactories/#2c661ab16c62
13. Ramsey, J. (2016). Tesla Reports Loss on Higher Research Costs. WSJ.
Retrieved 21 December 2016, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240
14. Thompson, C. (2016). Tesla has big, big plans for the next 4 years. Retrieved
2 March 2017, from http://www.businessinsider.com/everything-tesla-
promises-to-accomplish-by-2020-2016-7
15. Tao, R. (2016). Tesla Supply Chain - Custom-build World Class Supply
Chain. Tradegecko.com. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from
https://www.tradegecko.com/blog/tesla-custom-built-supply-chain
16. The consequences of climate change. (2016). Retrieved 16 December 2016,
from http://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
17. Transportation’s Role in Climate Change. (2016). Retrieved 19 December
2016, from https://climate.dot.gov/about/transportations-role/overview.html
18. Sustainable development. (2016). Retrieved 19 December 2016, from
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/energy
19. The structure of China’s oil industry. (2016). Retrieved 19 December 2016,
from https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/The-
structure-of-Chinas-oil-industry-past-trends-and-future-prospects-WPM-66.pdf
20. The Mission of Tesla. (2013). Tesla.com. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from
https://www.tesla.com/blog/mission-tesla
21. Tesla’s financial statements show the company’s rapid growth.
(2014). Retrieved 21 December 2016, from
https://www.yahoo.com/news/tesla-financial-statements-show-company-
170008930.html?ref=gs
22. Young, A. (2015). Tesla Motors Inc. (TSLA) Says Robots Are Holding Up Its
2015 Sales Growth. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from
http://www.ibtimes.com/tesla-motors-inc-tsla-says-robots-are-holding-its-2015-
sales-growth-2042191
Source of cartoon: https://www3.epa.gov/recyclecity/service.htm
... Tesla's goal is to develop "zero-emission electric vehicles" which performs better than the fueled vehicles while pacing the adoption of sustainable transportation by creating attractive massmarket electric cars (Bilbeisi & Kesse, 2017). Being one of the most innovative manufacturers in its industry, Tesla shared all its copyrighted technology with other companies with the intention to support the development of electric vehicles which will foster growth in its industry, thus aiding to environmental sustainability (Liu & Meng, 2017). ...
... The fluctuation in crude oil prices have a direct impact on fuel costs (Barbosa, et al., 2023). According to Tesla's team, driving a car for 15,000 miles per year will cost the owner around $7,000 in fuel, while driving an electric vehicle will cost only $600 (Bilbeisi & Kesse, 2017). However, David Rampson and Enrich Muehlegger (2023) advised that electric car cost savings vary per consumer. ...
... It was published by Wang, et al (2022) who originally cited it from the Tesla's website that humanity will be better in the future if the dependency on fossil fuels can be reduced. Tesla's goal is to develop "zero-emission electric" vehicles concur with the Paris Agreement for reduction in greenhouse gas emission (Bilbeisi & Kesse, 2017). published that Tesla's focus for 2018-2020 were on "batteries, photovoltaics, sustainability" and greenhouse gas emissions. ...
Research Proposal
Full-text available
Tesla’s focus on innovation for a sustainable environment and evaluating the effects of oil and gas prices on the sale of Tesla’s electric vehicles.
... Musk compared the prices spent for oil and the prices spent to maintain a car ran by gas versus a fully electrified car and came to the conclusion that the maintenance cost was 35% less for an electrified car than it was for a gas-powered car. In addition, a gasoline powered car will cost an average of $6957 on gasoline, while an electric powered car will only need to cost $540 on electricity [5,6]. It illustrated the growing needs of consumers to buy cars that will be economically efficient to take care of. ...
... This is why electric SUVs developed. As aforementioned, electric vehicles in general cost less than gasoline-powered cars to run, and the same applies for electric SUVs [6]. electric SUVs allow the consumers to enjoy the status symbol that comes with owning an SUV all while spending less to maintain their electric SUVs [12]. ...
... The economic benefits of electric vehicles on Uber and Lyft drivers are important, too. As aforementioned, the cost of maintaining an electric vehicle is much less than would the cost of maintaining a gasoline-powered car [6]. Uber and Lyft drivers need to pick up and drop off dozens of clients over the course of a day, and gasoline-powered cars would need to fill the gas frequently because of the long distances these Uber and Lyft drivers need to run, but electric vehicles could be able to charge at really low prices and run the same distances as to pick up and drop off the clients of these drivers. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper examines the political and economic views of the benefits of electric vehicles, through government funding and consumer taste, the preference for electric vehicles has been growing as the years progress. The current problem of global warming caused world leaders to fund and subsidize more and more electrical vehicle components and research on these components. The funding and subsidizing results in Consumer able to buy these electric vehicles for cheaper. The electric vehicles are also cheaper for consumers to maintain as of the gradual rise in oil prices becoming harder to maintain traditional gasoline powered cars. The finical crisis and the plummet of the stock market, especially during COVID 19 also contributed to consumers favoring electric vehicles. Consumer favoring SUVs also contributed to the growing preference for electric vehicles, as consumers see SUV as a type of status symbol, but as SUVs are low fuel economy cars, meaning they contribute a lot to carbon emissions, and are hard to maintain as they need too much oil, drove consumers to purchase electrical SUVs, as it can fulfill the sense of status and be cheaper to maintain at the same time. The future of the electrical car market seems to be on the positive side, as more and more funding by the environmentally-conscious governments allows for more research and time spent on finding cheaper and better ways of producing the components these electrical cars need, making it more accessible for a even wider range of consumers.
... In the contemporary period, the principal innovative affect driving the development of an electric alternative to the ICE has been environmental: supplying private car owners with the capacity to avoid dependence upon fossil fuels (Bilbeisi & Kesse, 2017;Dijk & Yarime, 2010, p. 1372. A further affect is associated with the relative costs of electricity and fossil fuels, enabling considerably lower running costs of ECs, though this benefit is currently offset by their higher purchase price in comparison to ICE vehicles (Moloughney, 2014). ...
... These innovators included Nissan, which marketed the compact hatchback LEAF in 2011, and Tesla Inc., which from 2009 entered the market with a sports car and a subsequent sedan/ saloon in 2012 -both aimed at high-end consumers: a market in which there was less price sensitivity. Development of these ECs has been intimately associated with the innovation of new battery technologies, enabling greater range and swifter charging (Berdichevsky et al., 2006;Bilbeisi & Kesse, 2017). I discuss battery technology in greater detail later in this section. ...
... Tesla Inc. was established in 2003 as a company whose business strategy included innovating a range of congruent energy generation and storage solutions (Bilbeisi & Kesse, 2017), including the battery pack for Tesla cars (Berdichevsky et al., 2006). 1 From its outset, the company was unusual in owning its entire supply chain -from manufacturing to distribution (Bilbeisi & Kesse, 2017). As an early innovator, and with demand spiralling as concern over fossil fuel induced climate change grew, it was able to market its high-end sports car Roadster and sedan/saloon Model S with virtually no competition (Nissan's LEAF was a compact EC, firmly aimed at a family market). ...
Article
Full-text available
Green capitalism is an approach that attempts to use free-market mechanisms to mitigate anthropogenic climate change. Its advocates argue that the market supplies the best means to innovate technological solutions that can compete with existing polluting practices. Using a relational, post-anthropocentric and materialist ontology, this article analyses the micropolitics underpinning the capitalist market economy in terms of production and market assemblages and the affective forces within them. This novel approach reveals previously overlooked more-than-human affects within these capitalist assemblages. These affects generate the unintended and inevitable consequences of a capitalist economic framework: growth, waste and inequalities. Based on this micropolitical assessment, the article uses the example of the electric car to conclude that green capitalism is inadequate to address the climate crisis, and offers an alternative approach.
... With natural disasters and global warming occurring more frequently around the world, more and more people are becoming aware of the importance of protecting the environment. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and more than 1,300 scientists from around the world predicted in 2016 that future temperatures would rise by 2.5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit over the next century [1]. In 2004, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) first introduced the concept of ESG investing, which focuses on the environmental, social, and governance aspects of business investment. ...
... In addition, other countries such as China, Germany, and the United States are experiencing an alarming increase in industrial volumes to meet the growing demand for consumer goods worldwide, accelerating the depletion of global oil reserves. Given the unsustainability of oildependent economic development, the rapid depletion of oil increases the call for renewable and diversified energy sources [1]. Then, the government begins to strongly encourage the emergence of environmentally friendly products such as bicycle sharing and new energy cars instead of gasoline cars. ...
Article
Full-text available
With the outbreak of natural disasters and extreme weather, people are paying more and more attention to protecting the environment and society. This society is gradually de-manding more and more from companies. In this context, the new concept of ESG has emerged under the call of the United Nations. This article details MSCI's ESG scoring sys-tem and what it covers. Through the ESC scoring system of MSCI, this paper analyzes Ford Motor Company, represented by gasoline cars, and Tesla Company, represented by electric cars, to reflect the current development of environment, society, and governance in the American automobile industry. We found that the overall ESG development of the American automotive industry still needs to be improved. Companies should also strength-en the development of management social aspects and corporate governance while consid-ering the development of environmentally friendly products.
... Asian market expansion: Tesla is making an aggressive push into Asian markets, including India. The electric vehicle market and the renewable energy market in Asia are growing rapidly, and Tesla has the opportunity to become a major player in the region and continue to increase its global market share [5]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tesla has not only made breakthroughs in products, but also played an active role in the field of sustainable development and environmental protection. The company's vision is to move the world towards a more sustainable and environmentally friendly future, with less reliance on fossil fuels. This paper delves into Tesla, Inc.'s strategic approach towards innovation and sustainability. It conducts a comprehensive case study of Tesla's Gigafactory in Nevada, dissecting Tesla's operational methods and underlining its dedication to large-scale sustainable manufacturing. By juxtaposing Tesla's practices with industry norms, the paper reveals how the company's groundbreaking initiatives are not only revolutionizing the automotive sector but also establishing new benchmarks across various industries globally. Additionally, the research scrutinizes Tesla's product portfolio and renewable energy endeavors, spotlighting the diverse strategies employed by Tesla to propel the global shift towards sustainable energy and transportation solutions. In terms of qualitative analysis, we delved into a comprehensive case study of the Nevada Gigafactory, conducting interviews with key personnel and conducting on-site observations to gain insights into Tesla's operational strategies. On the quantitative front, we made use of exclusive datasets to compare Tesla's performance metrics with industry benchmarks.
... The relevant contents of the case study are listed in Table 1. (Bilbeisi & Kesse, 2017;Karamitsios, 2013). Tesla aims to produce battery-powered Evs for the mainstream market with appealing customer value propositions, including extended range, flexible recharging, energy efficiency, low ownership cost, and high performance, without sacrificing appearance or usefulness. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Taking Tesla Motors as a case study object, this research aims to summarize the management strategy of Tesla Motors through an evaluation of its business models in Korea and China then helps other new energy automobile enterprises in formulating strategic directions in a targeted manner. Research design, data and methodology: Using the case study method, this study conducts in-depth research on the business model of Tesla, a representative enterprise of the new energy automobile industry. This study mainly uses secondary data obtained from the official websites to support our research. Results: With its top-level innovative technology, distinctive marketing model, and extensive strategic model, Tesla holds the largest share of the new energy vehicle market. Local market brands such as BYD and Hyundai-Kia still have a considerable competitive advantage, and there is a need to learn from each other for further development. Conclusions: To adapt to the needs of economic transformation and environmental development, implementing business strategies related to new energy automobile enterprises is a topic worthy of study. Enterprises such as BYD and Hyundai-Kia have unique advantages in their home markets. However, as sustainable development progresses, these advantages will gradually weaken, and further measures are necessary to maintain their competitive advantage.
... When Tesla started earning money and gaining a significant share of the luxury and sports vehicle markets, it quickly established itself as the mind-shaper it is today. Tesla was able to successfully develop a niche and a high-end brand image because of the celebrity effect [18], Unlike Volkswagen and Honda, which typically spend a lot of money on TV advertising and marketing, Tesla's first batch of customers included Brad Pitt, Larry Page and Sergey Lin of Google, Jeff Skoll of eBay, and Xiaomi's CEO Lei Jun. This group of consumers have good reputation in their communities and thus bring the positive exposure for Tesla. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper first introduces the development trend of new energy vehicles in the world, and then focuses on the development of new energy vehicles in the Chinese market. It also focuses on the development of the Chinese market for new energy vehicles in the next fifteen years from a policy perspective. Then it comes the current situation of the new energy industry, from its development history, to the current situation of China's new energy vehicle industry, and then to the prospect of new energy in China. After that, Tesla is analysed with Porter's five forces model, followed by a deeper analysis in terms of employee management, environmental impact, product impact, and marketing campaign. Later it discusses difficulties encountered by Tesla in terms of tax, localisation, brand competition, the impact of COVID-19, and safety issues. Lastly, a few recommendations are provided to encounter the difficulties mentioned above.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
L'intelligence artificielle (IA) peut jouer un rôle crucial dans la promotion du leadership durable en permettant aux entreprises et aux organisations de prendre des décisions plus éclairées, d'optimiser leurs processus et de réduire leur empreinte environnementale. En somme, une utilisation responsable et éthique de l'intelligence artificielle est un impératif pour garantir un leadership durable et positif dans le domaine industriel et au-delà. Cela exige l'engagement et la responsabilité de tous les acteurs impliqués dans le développement et l'adoption de l'IA. D'un point de vue pratique, notre recherche est susceptible d'éclairer les transformations à l'oeuvre dans les grandes entreprises socialement responsables et, nous mettons par la suite en perspective les modèles de Danone et Tesla. Mots-clés : intelligence artificielle; leadership durable; domaine industriel. Codes de classification Jel : O31, O32, O Abstract : Artificial intelligence (AI) can play a crucial role in promoting sustainable leadership by enabling companies and organizations to make more informed decisions, optimize their processes and reduce their environmental footprint. In sum, responsible and ethical use of artificial intelligence is imperative to ensure sustainable and positive leadership in industry and beyond. This requires the commitment and accountability of all actors involved in the development and adoption of AI. From a practical point of view, our research is likely to shed light on the transformations at work in large socially responsible companies and, we then put into perspective the models of Danone and Tesla.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The whole world is moving toward environmentally friendly and maintainable alternatives to conservative goods. Electric vehicles are regarded as an environmentally friendly and sustainable alternative for transportation. The purpose of the study is to analyze how tata motors became a market leader in the sales and manufacturing of Electric cars. Design/Methodology/Approach: India has the largest untapped market for electric vehicles (EVs), particularly in the two-wheeler category. In recent years, there has been a significant rise in the number of EVs on the road thanks to the rapid introduction of these vehicles by a number of automakers. The most recent electric car to come out of India is the Tata Nexon EV Max, and it promises to be very affordable. Tata Motors, an Indian automaker that operates in one of the world's largest automotive markets, is compared to Tesla. A survey was used by the author to carry out this study. The effect of has been the focus of the study. Secondary data are gathered for the study from a variety of sources, including TATA motors Ltd. websites, research papers, newspaper articles, and journals. Findings/Result: This paper has studied a SWOT analysis of Tata Motors Limited. The analysis reveals that TATA Motors has a huge customer base in the Indian market.it is quite popular and about 73% of electric cars on Indian roads belong to TATA Motors Tata Motors is India's third-largest company by market share and the market leader in the EV-Electric Vehicle sector. Tata Motors has been able to steadily expand by introducing new products in the most popular SUV and electric vehicle markets. To meet all of its customers' needs and provide them with the best vehicles, the company plans to launch new products in a variety of car segments using these new products and engine transmissions. Originality/Value: This paper studies about how tata became a market leader in electric car manufacturing and overall performance in terms of carrying customer satisfaction. Paper Type: Case Study.
Book
Abstract: Background: Climate change is a significant source of worry around the globe due to its impact on human health and livelihood. In the current situation after Covid-19, rising temperatures resulting from climate change are one of the most severe risks to humanity. Farmers are frequently exposed to heat stress due to their outside agricultural activity. So much research has been done on the impact of heat stress on agricultural workers worldwide. Objectives: Therefore, it is essential to highlight early research objectives in one location to comprehend how heat stress impacts farmers' livelihood and health and its mitigation throughout the world. Methods: We thoroughly examined the top 31 research papers from different online databases linked to heat stress epidemiology studies involving more than 3 lakh agricultural labourers worldwide. Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses of previously published priorities were categorized using the PRISMA declaration. Results: Where 84.25 % of the motioned population of agricultural workers are affected by heatstroke, and other hear related illnesses, 9.75% of workers are associated with occupation injury due to heat stress and 6% of workers are affected by kidney disease, headache, tiredness, sweating, dizziness, skin problem, confusion, loss of concentration, weight loss, dehydration, increasing physiological parameters (HR and core body temperature) and productivity loss. Conclusion: Most of the study recommended more specific research on outdoor workers physiological responses in different geographical locations, training, hydration, proper work�rest schedule, proper checking of the environmental condition by WBGT meter and adequate design of other suitable prevention measures for sustainable solutions to heat stress. Keywords: Environmental Heat, Agricultural Workers, Heat-related illness, Productivity loss, Effective Prevention Measures
  • About Tesla
About Tesla. (2016). Tesla.com. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from https://www.tesla.com/about#executives
Tesla Lowers Production Forecast, Sells US$500m-plus in Stock
  • A Crawford
Crawford, A. (2016). Tesla Lowers Production Forecast, Sells US$500m-plus in Stock. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from
Elon Musk just made a totally mind-blowing change to Tesla's strategy
  • M Debord
DeBord, M. (2016). Elon Musk just made a totally mind-blowing change to Tesla's strategy. Retrieved 2 March 2017, from http://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-mind-blowing-change-strategy-2016-5
Tesla's greatest hope for going mass market could present a threat to its car factory
  • M Debord
DeBord, M. (2017).Tesla's greatest hope for going mass market could present a threat to its car factory. Retrieved 30 March 2017, from http://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-gigafactory-problems-for-carmaking2017-1
Electric Car Maintenance A Third Cheaper Than Combustion Vehicles? Green Car Reports
  • A Ingram
Ingram, A. (2016). Electric Car Maintenance A Third Cheaper Than Combustion Vehicles? Green Car Reports. Retrieved 20 December 2016, from http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1080925_electric-car-maintenance-athird-cheaper-than-combustion-vehicles
The True Cost of Powering an Electric Car
  • C Lachnit
Lachnit, C. (2016). The True Cost of Powering an Electric Car. Edmunds. Retrieved 15 December 2016, from https://www.edmunds.com/fueleconomy/the-true-cost-of-powering-an-electric-car.html
How Much Does It Cost To Charge An Electric Car?
  • T Moloughney
Moloughney, T. (2016). How Much Does It Cost To Charge An Electric Car? Retrieved 20 December 2016, from https://pluginamerica.org/how-much-doesit-cost-charge-electric-car/
The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (just between you and me). Retrieved
  • E Musk
Musk, E. (2006). The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (just between you and me). Retrieved 30 March 2017 from https://www.tesla.com/blog/secret-teslamotors-master-plan-just-between-you-and-me
Tesla Owners Love Their Model S, Model X Vehicles, Despite Problems. Retrieved
  • P Murtha
Murtha, P. (2017). Tesla Owners Love Their Model S, Model X Vehicles, Despite Problems. Retrieved 30 March 2017, from http://www.jdpower.com/cars/articles/jd-power-studies/tesla-owners-love-theirmodel-s-model-x-vehicles-despite-problems
Tesla Plans Model 3 Electric Car Production from JulyAnd More Gigafactories Retrieved 2
  • A Ohnsman
Ohnsman, A. (2017) Tesla Plans Model 3 Electric Car Production from JulyAnd More Gigafactories. Retrieved 2 March 2017, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2017/02/22/tesla-plans-model-3electric-car-production-from-july-and-more-gigafactories/#2c661ab16c62