Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex

Article (PDF Available)inPersonality and Individual Differences · January 2017with 2,181 Reads
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053
Tinder, also known as the “hook-up app” is the leading online dating application. In this study, we explored the reasons for using Tinder when seeking opportunities for casual sex. We asked whether sexual disgust sensitivity and sociosexuality predict Tinder use with motivation for casual sex. We also tested if gender moderated this relationship. Results of the data collected from 169 Tinder using Amazon Mechanical Turk workers revealed that sexual disgust sensitivity and sociosexuality were predictors of motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. The participants with higher sexual disgust sensitivity reported a lower motivation while the participants with higher sociosexuality reported a higher motivation for casual sex in their Tinder usage. While this model explained the motivation for men, a different model explained women's motivation. Sociosexuality mediated the relationship between sexual disgust sensitivity and the motivation to use Tinder for casual sex for women Tinder users. Results are discussed from an evolutionary perspective.
Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict
motivation to use Tinder for casual sex
Barış Sevi ,Tuğçe Aral, Terry Eskenazi
Department of Psychology, Koç University, Turkey
abstractarticle info
Article history:
Received 2 J anuary 2017
Received in revised form 31 March 2017
Accepted 22 April 2017
Available online xxxx
Tinder, also known as the hook-up appis the leading online dating application. In this study, we explored the
reasons for using Tinderwhen seeking opportunities for casual sex. We asked whether sexual disgust sensitivity
and sociosexuality predict Tinder use with motivation for casual sex. We also tested if gender moderated this re-
lationship. Results of the data collected from 169 Tinder using Amazon Mechanical Turk workers revealed that
sexual disgust sensitivity and sociosexuality were predictors of motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. The par-
ticipants with higher sexual disgust sensitivity reported a lower motivation while the participants with higher
sociosexuality reported a higher motivation for casual sex in their Tinder usage. While this model explained
the motivation for men, a different model explained women's motivation. Sociosexuality mediatedthe relation-
ship between sexual disgust sensitivity and the motivation to use Tinder for casual sex for women Tinder users.
Results are discussed from an evolutionary perspective.
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Sexual disgust sensitivity
Online dating motivation
Mating strategies
1. Introduction
Tinder is a location based online dating application enabling its users
to connect with potential matches. Since its launch in 2012, it has been
growing continuously with 100 million downloads and 10 million daily
users it is the leading dating application (March, Grieve, Marrington, &
Jonason,2017; Orosz, Tóth-Király, Bőthe, & Melher, 2016). Like its coun-
terparts, the promoted motivation for Tinder use is casual sex
(Daneback, Månsson, & Ross, 2007), however Tinder has particularly
gained a reputation in the popular media as the hook-up app(Sales,
Recently the motivations to use Tinder have been under scientic
scrutiny, and research conrmed hooking-up as one of the motivations
among Tinder users (Carpenter & McEwan, 2016; Gatter & Hodkinson,
2016). To thoroughly investigate the motivations to use Tinder,
Sumter, Vandenbosch, and Ligtenberg (2017) developed a measure
that specied six primary motivations: casual sex,love,ease of communi-
cation,self-worth validation,thrill of excitement,andtrendiness. The study
has also reported gender differences in motivation to use Tinder, where
male users showed a higher motivation for casual sex than female users.
Gender differences in online dating behavior have been reported be-
fore (see Abramova, Baumann, Krasnova, & Buxmann, 2016). It has been
shown that more male respondents than female respondents indicate
that they believed Tinder was to meet sexual partners (Carpenter &
McEwan, 2016). In another study, Tyson, Perta, Haddadi, and Seto
(2016) found that men and women employ different strategies when
using the app, such that, male users, compared to females, were less se-
lective of their potential matches while using the app. These ndings,
that males favor a non-selective approach and exhibit a higher motiva-
tion for casual sex, are in line with the Parental Investment Theory
(Trivers, 1972). Parental investment refers to the investment of time,
energy, and resources a parent devotes to the survival of their offspring.
Parental investment can differ according to the gender of the parent,
which results in differences in sexual selection, and mating strategies
(Schmitt et al., 2003). In humans, females are known to make a consid-
erably higher investment in their offspring than males (Schmitt, 2005).
Women are obligated with the costs of placentation, gestation, and after
birth lactation, while the minimal physiological cost for men is provi-
sion of the sperm(Schmitt et al., 2003).As postulated by the parental in-
vestment theory, because mating is a low-cost activity for males, they
can afford to be non-discriminant in their mate selection (Geary,
1998; Le Boeuf, 1974). This may explain why men tend to be less selec-
tive on online dating platforms.
According to another theory, short term mating is not a strategy
employed exclusively by men. Sexual Strategies Theory (Buss &
Schmitt, 1993) posits that both short-term and long-term relationships
are part of mating strategy repertoires of males and females alike. Al-
though men and women similarly employ both mating strategies,
their motivations in doing so may differ. Men's pursuit of short-term
mates seemsto be motivated by their adaptive desire for sexualvariety
(Buss & Schmitt, 1993; Symons, 1979). For women, on the other hand,
short-term mating may provide the advantage of nding mates with
Personality and Individual Differences xxx (2017) xxxxxx
Corresponding author at: Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, 34450 Sarıyer, İstanbul,
E-mail address: bsevi15@ku.edu.tr (B. Sevi).
PAID-08320; No of Pages 4
0191-8869/© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Personality and Individual Differences
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paid
Please cite this article as: Sevi, B., et al., Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder
for casual sex, Personality and Individual Differences (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053
high genetic quality (Fisher, 1958; Pillsworth, Haselton, & Buss, 2004;
Sela, Weekes-Shackelford, Shackelford, & Pham, 2015).
Short term mating inclination can be indexed by sociosexuality,
which refers to an individual's willingness to engage in uncommitted
sexual contact (Penke & Asendorpf, 2008). Thus, people with high
scores on sociosexual orientation are considered to be more likely to en-
gage in unrestricted relationships (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991)in
which they are more likely to engage in sex without establishing close-
ness, commitment, or emotional bonding with a partner, compared to
those with lower sociosexual scores (Simpson & Gangestad, 1992).
Therefore, scoring high on sociosexual orientation is used as an indica-
tor of short term mating (Jonason & Buss, 2012; Jonason, Li, Webster,
& Schmitt, 2009; Provost, Troje, & Quinsey, 2008). Different factors
have been found to affect sociosexuality, such as societal factors like
having divorced parents (Barber, 1998), and individual differences like
personality (Jonason, Teicher, & Schmitt, 2011)andage(Sprecher,
Treger, & Sakaluk, 2013). Various studies have suggested that
sociosexuality also varies with people's disgust sensitivity (e.g.
Al-Shawaf, Lewis, Alley, & Buss, 2015; Tybur, Inbar, Güler, & Molho,
Disgust is an emotion that plays a role in promoting tness and se-
lection of a mate (Tybur & de Vries, 2013; Phelan & Edlund, 2016).
Three domains of disgust have been described as adaptive responses
to different selection pressures: pathogen, sexual, and moral disgust
(Tybur, Lieberman, & Griskevicius, 2009). Sexual disgust is an evolved
response to prevent mating with biologically suboptimal partners
(Fessler & Navarrete, 2003). Recent studies have investigated the role
of disgust sensitivity in various sexual behaviors, such as mate selection
(Lee, Dubbs, Von Hippel, Brooks, & Zietsch, 2014; Tybur & Gangestad,
2011) and sexual arousal (Borg & de Jong, 2012; de Jong, van
Overveld, & Borg, 2013). Of particular interest, Al-Shawaf, Lewis, and
Buss (2015) have observed a link between disgust and short-term mat-
ing, and showed that reduced levels of sexual disgust are associated
with people's higher tendency for short-term relationships. Here we
ask whether sexual disgust sensitivity can predict people's use of Tinder
for casual sex.
The primary aim of the present study is to investigate whether sex-
ual disgust sensitivity and sociosexuality predict the motivation to use
Tinder for casual sex.
2. Method
2.1. Participants and procedure
A total of 163 Tinder users were recruited via Amazon Mechanical
Turk as participants, for a compensation of 15 cents each (87 female;
age range: 1853 years, mean age = 27.9, SD = 6.5). Only users from
the United States were allowed to participate in the study. The majority
identied themselves as heterosexual (n = 143), while 15 of the re-
maining participants identied as lesbian, gay or bisexual. Five of the
participants did not report any sexual orientation. All participants
were included in our analysis regardless of their sexual orientation.
2.2. Materials
2.2.1. Disgust
We used the Three Domain Disgust Scale to assess the disgust sensi-
tivity of the participants (Tybur et al., 2009). It is a 21-item measure
with three seven-item factors assessing pathogen, sexual, and moral
disgust. Participants rated how disgusting they found each item on a
7-point Likert scale (0 = not disgusting at all, 6 = extremely disgust-
ing). Sample items from sexual disgust factor involves hearing two
stranger having sex, a sample item for pathogen disgust is stepping
on dog poop, and shoplifting a candy bar from a convenience store
for moral disgust. The sub-scales for the three disgust domains are
found highly reliable (Cronbach's alpha for pathogen disgust, 0.79, for
sexual disgust, 0.82, for moral disgust, 0.87.)
2.2.2. Sociosexual orientation
We used the Revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory to assess
participants' orientation towards unrestricted sociosexual orientation
(SOI-R; Penke & Asendorpf, 2008). The inventory consisted of 9 items
and 3 subscales: Behavior (e.g., with how many different partners
have you had sexual intercourse on one and only one occasion?), Atti-
tude (e.g., sex without love is OK.) and Desire (e.g., how often do you
have sexual arousal with someone with whom you do not have a com-
mitted romantic relationship?). A total sociosexualorientation score is
computed by summing all inventory items. Higher scores specied
higher tendency towards unrestricted sociosexuality while lower scores
indicated more restricted orientation (Cronbach's alpha = 0.71, 0.80,
0.81, and 0.87 for the total score and the facets Behavior, Attitude, and
Desire, respectively).
2.2.3. Tinder usage motivation
We assessed participants' motivation to use Tinder with the mea-
sure of Tinder Motivations developedby Sumter et al. (2017). The mea-
sure is composed of six factors (love,casual sex,ease of communication,
self-worth validation,thrill of excitement and trendiness) with total num-
ber of 46 items. Participants were asked to rate each statement, on a 5-
point Likert (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). The factor thrill
of excitement and trendiness were excluded from the analysis as their re-
liability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.28 and 0.59, respectively) do not satisfy
Kline's criterion for satisfactory reliability (1986). The remaining ve
Tinder usage factors were found reliable (Cronbach's alpha for love =
0.78, casual sex = 0.84, ease of communication = 0.75, self-worth val-
idation = 0.77). All reliability analyses reported above were performed
in line with the original study by Sumter et al. (2017).
3. Results
As shown on Table 1, we performed t-tests to explore the possible
gender differences in sociosexuality, motivationsto use Tinder and dis-
gust sensitivities. We found signicant differences for sociosexuality,
Tinder motivation for casual sex, and sexual disgust sensitivity; men
were higher on motivation to use Tinder for casual sex and
sociosexuality, while they were lower on sexual disgust sensitivity
(see Table 1).
We also calculated the correlations between the three variables. The
results showed that Tinder motivation for casual sex wasnegatively cor-
related with sexual disgust sensitivity (r=0.45, pb0.01), positively
correlated with sociosexuality (r=0
.56,pb0.01). We repeated these
analyses separately for female and male participants (see Table 2).
A multiple regression analysis was performed to test whether the
two variables predicted casual sex motivation for Tinder use. The results
demonstrated that both sexual disgust sensitivity (β=0.227, pb
Table 1
Descriptive statistics and sex differences for measures of Tinder usage motivations, dis-
gust, and sociosexuality.
Male (SD) Female (SD) td
Sociosexuality 5.21 (1.66) 4.04 (1.47) 4.767* 0.75
Tinder motivation
Casual sex 3.08 (1.05) 2.15 (1.05) 5.671 * 0.89
Love 3.51 (0.74) 3.65 (0.78) 1.121 0.18
Ease of communication 3.29 (0.80) 3.21 (0.89) 0.587 0.09
Self-worth validation 3.20 (0.88) 3.30 (0.98) 0.581 0.09
Trendiness 3.31 (0.64) 3.25 (0.86) 0.484 0.08
Sexual 1.52 (1.13) 2.61 (1.28) 5.709* 0.90
Pathogen 3.51 (1.10) 3.80 (1.13) 1.588 0.24
Moral 3.50 (1.28) 3.57 (1.50) 0.481 0.08
Note. Asterisks indicate signicant differences between gender (*pb0.001).
2B. Sevi et al. / Personality and Individual Differences xxx (2017) xxxxxx
Please cite this article as: Sevi, B., et al., Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder
for casual sex, Personality and Individual Differences (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053
0.001, sr
=0.20) and sociosexuality (β= 0.449, pb0.001, sr
0.39), independently predicted sex motivation for Tinder use (adjusted
= 0.35, F(2162) = 43.944, pb0.001).
We performed a second multiple regression analysis to investigate
whether both predictors follow a similar path for females and males
by splitting the data by gender. This analysis produced a signicant
model for male users as sexual disgust (β=0.29, pb0.05) and
sociosexuality predicting (β=0.40,pb0.001) Tinder use for casual
sex (adjusted R
=0.30,F(2, 75) = 17.463, pb0.001; Fig. 1).
For females the analysis produced another model. When entered to-
gether in the analysis, sexual disgust no longer had a signicant effect (p
N0.05). Therefore, we conducted a mediation analysis for females using
the PROCESS macro in SPSS (Model 4, with a bootstrap approach of
5000 drawings; Hayes, 2013;Fig. 2). Results indicated that sexual dis-
gust sensitivity was a signicant predictor of sociosexuality, (β=
0.53, SE =0.11,pb0.001), and sociosexuality was a signicant pre-
dictor of Tinder use for casual sex,(β=0.32,SE = 0.08, pb0.001). Sex-
ual disgust was no longer a signicant predictor of Tinder use for casual
sex among females after controlling for the mediator, sociosexuality, (β
=0.05, SE = 0.09, ns). Approximately 35% of the variance in Tinder
use for casual sex was accounted for by sexual disgust sensitivity and
sociosexuality (R
=0.354,F(2160) = 43.9444, pb0.001).
4. Discussion
The aim of this study was toexplore the link between sociosexuality
and sexual disgust sensitivity as predictors of casual sex motivation for
Tinder use.Even though previous research on theTinder application in-
vestigated individual differences, and motivations for Tinder use, to our
knowledge no empirical study has previously investigated the mecha-
nisms behind casual sex motivation of Tinder users. Our ndings dem-
onstrated that sexual disgust sensitivity and sociosexuality predicted
Tinder users' motivation for casual sex. The participants with higher
sexual disgust sensitivity reported less motivation for casual sex in
their Tinder use, while the participants with higher sociosexuality re-
ported a higher motivation to use Tinder for casual sex.
Previously, many studies demonstrated gender difference in individ-
uals' sexual strategies (Petersen & Hyde, 2010). In order to test whether
our model ofTinder use motivation for casual sex differed based on gen-
der, we also performed our analyses separately for men and women.
While sexual disgust sensitivity and sociosexuality directly predicted
motivation to use Tinder for casual sex in men,while sociosexuality me-
diated this relationship between sexual disgust sensitivity and motiva-
tion to use Tinder for casual sex in women. This difference may be due
to gender differences observed in risk taking behavior.
Casual sex offers immediate interpersonal contact and leaves people
vulnerable to risks such as getting sexually transmitted diseases, un-
wanted pregnancy, and mating with genetically incompatible mates.
Sexual disgust is an evolvedresponse providinga safeguard against sex-
ual risks. In general, men are more inclined to take risks than women
(Byrnes, Miller, & Schafer, 1999). Of particular interest, Baker and
Maner (2008) observed risk taking behavior as part of male mating
strategies. In their experiment, they reported a positive relationship be-
tween risk-taking behavior and motivation to pursue sexual relation-
ships in men who were exposed to images of attractive mates, but not
in those who were exposed to images of unattractive mates, nor in
women. This could explain the gender difference we found in our sam-
ple, since Tinder users present themselves with their chosen photo-
graphs, which are usually their most attractive (MacKee, 2016).
Regardless of their sexual disgust sensitivity men could thus be more
motivated towards casual sex overall. In case of women, given that
women generally are not high risk takers, and also, as argued by the Pa-
rental Investment Theory, they have a greater obligation to invest in
their offspring, only those who are low on disgust sensitivity may
favor casual sex, and therefore choose to be on Tinder. This might
have constrained our sample to women who have low sexual disgust
sensitivity, which could potentially explain why sexual disgust sensitiv-
ity did not predict Tinder use motivation for casual sex in women when
controlling for sociosexuality.
This study makes use of three self report measures, although these
measures have frequently been used in the eld (e.g. Al Shawaf et al.,
2015) and their reliabilities have repeatedly been conrmed, psycho-
metrically speaking gender has shown to be a factor which can bias
the use of scales (Lange, Irwin, & Houran, 2000; Lange, Thalbourne,
Houran, & Storm, 2000). This may potentially have inuenced our re-
sults. To our knowledge, no previous study has looked for potential gen-
der biases on these scales. For future studies psychometric examination
of these scales would be benecial for the scientic community to bias-
free results.
Caution is needed when suggesting causality with a mediation anal-
ysis based on cross sectional data. Apart from a few exceptions (cf. Al-
Shawaf et al., 2015) sexual disgust has been accepted as an evolved pre-
caution for adaptive problems regarding sexual behavior (Tybur,
Lieberman, Kurzban, & DeScioli, 2013), and thus can indeed predict
short-term mating preferences. As for the relationship between short
term mating and Tinder use motivation for casual sex, to our knowl-
edge, this study is the rst to report such a directional link. It is plausible
to consider individuals' shortterm matinginclinations as a predictor for
Tinder use motivation for casual sex. Further experimental research is
needed to substantiate this causal link between variables in our model.
On the whole, our results show that evolutionary mating theories
have explanatory power in today's online dating environment, which
we nd nontrivial. Future studies should further elucidate the applica-
bility of evolutionary theories to mating behaviors in increasingly devel-
oping technologies and changing dating cultures of the 21st century.
Table 2
Correlation between variables for males and females.
1. Casual sex motivation
2. Sexual disgust 0.43⁎⁎
3. SOI-R 0.50⁎⁎
1. Casual sex motivation
2. Sexual disgust 0.27
3. SOI-R 0.48⁎⁎
⁎⁎ pb0.01.
Fig. 1. Sexual disgust and sociosexuality on casual sex motivation to use Tinder for males
Fig. 2. Mediation model for the effect of sexual disgust on casual sex motivation to use
Tinder for females *pb0.01.
3B. Sevi et al. / Personality and Individual Differences xxx (2017) xxxxxx
Please cite this article as: Sevi, B., et al., Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder
for casual sex, Personality and Individual Differences (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053
Abramova, O., Baumann, A., Krasnova, H., & Buxmann, P. (2016, January). Gender differ-
ences in online dating: What do we know so far? A systematic literature review.
2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Scien ces (HICSS)
(pp. 38583867). IEEE.
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M., Alley, T. R., & Buss, D. M. (2015). Mating strategy, disgust, and
food neophobia. Appetite,85,3035.
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2015). Disgust and mating strategy. Evolution
and Human Behavior,36(3), 199205.
Baker, M. D., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating
strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior,29(6), 391395.
Barber, N.(1998). Sex differences in disposition towards kin, security of adultattachment,
and sociosexuality as a function of parental divorce. Evolution and Human Behavior,
19(2), 125132.
Borg, C., & de Jong, P. J. (2012). Feelings of disgust and disgust-inducedavoidance weaken
following induced sexual arousalin women. PloS One,7,e44111.http://dx.doi.org/10.
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective
on human mating. Psychological Review,100(2), 204.
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A
meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,125(3), 367.
Carpenter, C. J., & McEwan, B. (2016). The players of micro-dating: Individual and gender
differences in goal orientations toward micro-dating apps. First Monday,21(5).
Daneback, K., Månsson,S. A., & Ross, M. (2007).Using the internet to nd ofine sex part-
ners. Cyberpsychology & Behavior,10(1), 100107.
Fessler, D. M., & Navarrete, C. D. (2003). Meat is good to taboo: Dietary proscriptionsas a
product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. Journal
of Cognition and Culture,3(1), 140.
Fisher, R. A. (1958). The genetical theory of natural selection (2nd ed.). New York, NY:
Gatter, K., & Hodkinson, K. (2016). On the differences between Tinderversus online
dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study. Cogent Psychology,3(1)
Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:
A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Jonason, P. K., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Avoiding entangling commitments: Tactics for
implementing a short-term mating strategy. Personality and Individual Differences,
52(5), 606610.
Jonason, P.K., Li, N. P., Webster, G.D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: Facilitating a
short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality,23(1), 518.
Jonason, P. K., Teicher, E. A., & Schmitt, D. P. (2011). The TIPI's validity conrmed: Associ-
ations with sociosexuality and self-esteem. Indivi dual Differences Research,9(1),
de Jong, P. J., van Overveld, M., & Borg, C. (2013). Giving in to arousal or staying stuck in
disgust? Disgust-based mechanisms in sex and sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sex
Research,50(34), 247262.
Lange, R., Irwin, H. J., & Houran, J. (2000). Top-down purication of Tobacyk's revised
paranormal belief scale. Personality and Individual Differences,29(1), 131156.
Lange, R., Thalbourne, M. A., Houran, J., & Storm, L. (2000). The revised transliminality
scale: Reliability and validity data from a Rasch top-down purication procedure.
Consciousness and Cognition,9(4), 591617.
Le Boeuf, B. J. (1974). Male-male competition and reproductive success inelephant seals.
American Zoologist,14(1), 163176.
Lee, A. J., Dubbs, S. L., Von Hippel, W., Brooks, R. C., & Zietsch, B. P. (2014). A multivariate
approach to human mate preferences . Evolution and Hum an Behavior,35(3),
MacKee, F. (2016). Social media in gay London:Tinder as an alternative to hook-up apps.
Social Media + Society,2(3).
March, E., Grieve, R., Marrington, J., & Jonason, P. K. (2017). Trolling on Tinder® (and
other dating apps): Examining the role of the dark tetrad and impulsivity.
Personality and Individual Differences,110,139143.
Orosz, G., Tóth-Király, I., Bőthe, B., & Melher, D. (2016). Too many swipes for today: The
development of the Problematic Tinder Use Scale (PTUS). Journal of Behavioral
Addictions,5(3), 518523.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008).Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differ-
entiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relation-
ships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,95(5), 1113.
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differ-
ences in sexuality, 19932007. Psychological Bulletin,136(1), 21.
Phelan, N.,& Edlund,J. E. (2016). How disgust affects romantic attraction: the inuence of
moods on judgments of attractiveness. Evolutionary Psychological Science,2(1),
Pillsworth, E. G., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2004). Ovulatory shifts in female sexual
desire. Journal of Sex Research,41(1), 5565.
Provost, M. P., Troje, N. F., & Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Short-term mating strategies and at-
traction to masculinity in point-light walkers. Evolution and Human Behavior,29(1),
Sales, N. J. (2015). Tinder and the dawn of the dating apocalypse.Vanity Fair.
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of
sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,28(02),
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., Bennett, K. L., et al. (2003). Universal
sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents,
and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(1), 85104.
Sela, Y., Weekes-Shackelford, V. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Pham, M. N. (2015). Female cop-
ulatory orgasm and male partner's attractiveness to his partner and other women.
Personality and Individual Differences,79,1
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evi-
dence for convergent and discriminant validity. Jour nal of Personality and Social
Psychology,60(6), 870.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice.
Journal of Personality,60(1), 3151.
Sprecher, S., Treger, S., & Sakaluk, J. K. (2 013). Premarital sexual standards and
sociosexuality: Gender, ethnicity, and cohort differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior,
42(8), 13951405.
Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligte nberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling
emerging adults' motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and
Informatics,34(1), 6778.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual
selectionand the descent of man: 18711971(pp. 136179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Tybur, J. M., & de Vries, R. E.(2013). Disgust sensitivity and the HEXACO model of person-
ality. Personality and Individual Differences,55(6), 660665.
Tybur, J. M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2011). Mate preferences and infectious disease: Theoret-
ical considerations and evidence in humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society, B: Biological Sciences,366(1583), 33753388.
Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Güler, E., & Molho, C. (2015). Is the relationship between pathogen
avoidanceand ideological conservatism explained by sexual strategies? Evolution and
Human Behavior,36(6), 489497.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: In-
dividual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology,97(1), 103.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function
and structure. Psychological Review,120(1), 65.
Tyson, G., Perta, V. C., Haddadi, H., & Seto, M.C. (2016, November). Arstlookatuserac-
tivity on tinder. Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2016
IEEE/ACM International Conference on (pp. 461466). IEEE.
4B. Sevi et al. / Personality and Individual Differences xxx (2017) xxxxxx
Please cite this article as: Sevi, B., et al., Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder
for casual sex, Personality and Individual Differences (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.053
  • ... As such, a person's sociosexuality should be a particularly good predictor of PBMDA use, as this provides an alternative arena for dating and short-term sexual encounters (Asendorpf, Penke, & Back, 2011). Sevi, Aral, and Eskenazi (2017) reported the only evidence that indirectly supports this claim in a recent M-Turk study of 163 Tinder users. They found that socio- sexuality strongly predicted Tinder use motivation, and that socio- sexuality fully accounted for the inhibiting effect of disgust on moti- vation to use. ...
    ... Further, we expect that unrestricted sociosexuality predicts being more comfortable picking up a stranger, seeking short-term mates (hooking up, casual sex) rather than long-term mates (i.e., committed relationship), and rating themselves high on short-term mate value. In predicting PBMDA use, we expect that sociosexuality accounts for the effect of the other short-term oriented indicators (Moran et al., 2018;Penke & Asendorpf, 2008;Sevi et al., 2017). ...
    ... It would seem that new technology use is driven by a stable sexual psychology; including sex differences and sexual conflicts in human mating (Buss, 2017). Importantly, our finding on predictors of actual PBMDA use strongly support Sevi et al. (2017) who reported increase in motivation for Tinder use among sociosexually unrestricted participants. Additionally, this is in line with recent, preliminary findings ( Kuhle et al., 2016), that report traditional patterns and sex differences in how people present themselves on Tinder, mirroring how people used to present and pro- mote themselves in newspaper personal ads. ...
    This study investigates individual differences, sex differences and predictors of current and prior use of Picture-Based Mobile Dating Apps (PBMDA), including level and type of PBMDA activity, and reasons for PBMDA use. Six hundred and forty-one Norwegian university students aged between 19 and 29 years completed a questionnaire in lecture breaks. Nearly half of the participants reported former or current PBMDA use. One in five was current users. We found that PBMDA-users tend to report being less restricted in their sociosexuality (as measured with the SOI-R) than participants who have never used PBMDAs. This effect was equally strong for men and women. Sociosexuality essentially accounted for the effects of other variables such as seeking a casual sex partner, being comfortable picking up strangers, and self-reported short-term mate value. As predicted, women and men's reasons for using PBMDAs differed. Relative to women, men emphasized desire for sex as a reason for using PBMDAs. When controlling for sex, age and SOI Desire there was no evidence that length of use increased lifetime casual sex partners. We conclude that the new technology provided by PBMDAs merely represents a new arena for short-term sexual behavior, and not necessarily a facilitator of new sexual behaviors.
  • ... The second research stream focuses on who uses mobile dating apps. Sociosexuality-defined as the extent to which someone has a restricted or unrestricted orientation toward sexual activitywas found to be a strong predictor for using dating apps for casual sex ( Carpenter & McEwan, 2016;Sevi, Aral, & Eskenazi, 2017). Sociability and impulsivity are also significantly related to using dating apps ( Carpenter & McEwan, 2016). ...
    ... In addition, answering calls for future research to examine a more holistic set of variables as antecedents of mobile dating app ( Ranzini & Lutz, 2017), this study also examines influences of sensation seeking, loneliness, and privacy concerns to test the wellfounded recreation and compensation hypotheses regarding online activity motives. Moreover, previous studies mainly examined one app platform, Tinder ( Hobbs et al., 2017;Sevi et al., 2017;Timmermans & De Caluwé, 2017a, 2017b). To our knowledge, little research has explored this phenomenon on a different technology platform. ...
    Full-text available
    Digital space continues to be a popular venue for meeting new people. However, little is known about who uses mobile context-aware social networking apps to initiate new relationships. This study investigates the roles of individual core traits and surface characteristics in the adoption of social discovery features on WeChat, a mobile social networking app in China. Analysis of survey data collected from 213 WeChat users finds the core traits of agreeableness and neuroticism to be negatively related to the use of these social discovery features. The surface characteristic of sensation seeking is positively related to the use of social discovery features, while the surface characteristic of loneliness is not. Based on the findings, directions for future research and implications for app developers and marketers are suggested.
  • ... Of particular interest is the apparent tendency for people to prefer to interact with other people that resemble them in some way. Current research on Tinder includes ethnographic investigations of its users and quantitative analyses of gross user behavior and the implications that has for understanding human mating behavior (Albury 2017;Sevi et al. 2017;Sumter et al. 2017;Tyson et al. 2016;Carpenter & McEwan 2016;Ligtenberg 2015); research has also been undertaken that delves more broadly into attraction and the way human behavior is altered by being projected into a digital space, as well as how other features that are now considered characteristic of the internet (such as anonymity) have altered the way humans interact in digital spaces ( Albury et al. 2017;Blackwell & Birnholtz 2014;Daniels 2012;Ellison, Hancock & Toma 2012;Gibbs, Ellison & Heino 2006). ...
    This study seeks to investigate the ways in which individuals make sense of the nearly overwhelming amount of information they are presented with in an application like Tinder, and the ways in which their experiences at the confluence of the digital and “real” worlds are informed by various forces, including race and ethnicity. In particular, it seeks to determine how the experiences of marginalized groups are represented (and underrepresented) through the design and use of the app. By engaging with students at the University of Pennsylvania through a series of semi-structured interviews, this study reveals that users are enmeshed in a constant and ever-evolving relationship with the app. They appear to be endlessly renegotiating how they make sense of their own expectations and desires, as well as the means by which they attempt to speak to something broader than themselves.
  • ... This is not the first study to investigate sociosexual orientations and technology use. Specifically, recent research speculates that unrest- ricted individuals tend to be more motivated to use Tinder to gain casual sex from strangers (Sevi, Aral, & Eskenazi, 2017). This research ex- amining sociosexuality and Tinder use, and the findings from the cur- rent study further validate the SOI and illustrate how another app's use is affected by sociosexuality. ...
    Full-text available
    Snapchat is a popular social media app that provides users the opportunity to send and receive photos and videos; however, these photos and videos only last ten seconds with a close group of friends. However, there is little research regarding user's sexual behavior with the app. This current project (N = 450, 126 men and 324 women), investigated the sex difference between men and women and their use of the app for sending naked snapchats, gaining sexual access, and gaining a sexual hookup. It was hypothesized that men were more likely to use the app to gain a mate, and ask for naked snapchats. Women were predicted to be more likely than men to use the app to send naked snapchats to a partner, and to use this behavior continually to keep their partner interested. It was also hypothesized that unrestricted individuals would use the app more. These hypotheses were partially supported. Women did not use the app to continuously send naked snapchats. However, men were more likely than women to use the app for a hookup and unrestricted individuals were associated with using Snapchat to gain sexual access, hookups, and to continue sending naked snapchats.
  • ... Cur- rently, matchmaking applications are one of the most used mediums for people to meet new poten- tial mates, "Tinder" being the app with the most users. Although studies show that people's moti- vation to use this application is more for "love" than "casual sex," the application is presented as the "hookup app" ( Sevi et al. 2017). This increase in sexual exposure has been argued to be a possi- ble reason for the endorsement and participation in the hookup culture, just as the relation between aggression and media violence (Heldman and Wade 2010). ...
    Full-text available
  • ... Tinder was swiftly embraced by many across the demographic spectrum, particularly by a younger demographic ( Smith, 2016). Scholarly work on the app is only recently emerging and has largely examined motivations for using Tinder ( Gatter & Hodkinson, 2016;Sevi, Aral & Eskenazi, 2017;Sumter, Vandenbosch & Ligtenberg, 2017;Timmermans & De Caluwé, 2017a, 2017b) and self-representation or impression management ( Mason, 2016;Richey, 2016;Ward, 2016aWard, , 2016b). Others have looked at relationship initiation ( LeFebvre, 2017), 'trolling' ( March et al., 2017), harassment ( Richey, 2016), privacy ( Lutz & Ranzini, 2017), body image ( Strubel & Petrie, 2017), and intimacy ( David & Cambre, 2016;Hobbs, Owen & Gerber, 2016). ...
    Full-text available
    Mobile phone dating applications (dating apps) are a pervasive means of finding intimate partners, with Tinder as the most popular interface globally. Although this app is largely marketed towards heterosexuals, members of the queer community also utilise it. Since its inception, the internet has been very useful for non-heterosexuals seeking contact with others from their community, due to the safety and anonymity it affords them. When it comes to the internet and intimacy-seeking within the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer community, bisexual women have received very limited scholarly attention. Tinder, too, has not yet received a great deal of psychological examination. To address these omissions, in this paper we examine the experiences of eight bisexual women who were interviewed in-depth about their Tinder use in New Zealand. The interview data were thematically analysed and three themes identified: Tinder as not (queer) woman friendly; the (un)safety of Tinder; and virtual (un)reality. We discuss these themes and conclude that within this domain of technologically mediated intimacies, an intersection of heteronormative, biphobic, and gendered power relations profoundly shape bisexual women's experiences of using Tinder.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Mobile dating is more common with an increasing number of smartphone applications coming to market that aim to facilitate dating. In the current study, we investigated how dating app use and motivations related to demographic identity variables (i.e. gender and sexual orientation) and personality-based variables among young adults. Nearly half of the sample used dating apps regularly, with Tinder being the most popular. Non-users were more likely to be heterosexual, high in dating anxiety, and low in sexual permissiveness than dating app users. Among app users, dating app motivations, that is, relational goal motivations (love, casual sex), intrapersonal goal motivations (self-worth validation, ease of communication), and entertainment goal motivations (thrill of excitement, trendiness), were meaningfully related to identity features, for example, sexual permissiveness was related to the casual sex motive. Our study underlines that users’ identity drives their motivations for and engagement in mobile dating. However, more research is needed to study how sexual orientation influences mobile dating.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Tinder is the leading online dating application. The users have different motivations to use the application, and casual sex is one of the major ones. Having casual sex has risks for the individuals’ health and safety. Casual sex may also result in suboptimal sexual behaviors. This study aimed to answer three questions: (1) Do Tinder users and non-users differ in their sexual disgust and health/safety risk-taking? (2) Does sexual disgust sensitivity and health/safety risk-taking predict the motivation use Tinder for casual sex? And, (3) does sex influence these differences? Results from 271 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers showed that Tinder users take more health/safety risks and have lower sexual disgust sensitivity than non-users. Also, propensity of health/ safety risk-taking and sexual disgust sensitivity predicts the motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Furthermore, the effects of health/safety risk-taking and sexual disgust on Tinder use operated differently according to sex.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    No longer conceptualised as only for the “desperate”, online dating offers many benefits over face-to-face dating. Accompanying the benefits of online dating is the potential for new, distinct forms of antisocial behaviour online, such as trolling. The current study (N = 357) sought to explore the antisocial behaviour of trolling on Location-Based Real-Time Dating applications (i.e., LBRTD apps) in an online sample of Australians sourced from the community. Specifically, we examined the role of participant's sex and of the personality traits of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, sadism, and impulsivity in predicting perpetration of trolling behaviours on LBRTD apps. Although there were no sex differences, the traits of psychopathy, sadism, and dysfunctional impulsivity were significantly associated with trolling behaviours. Subsequent moderation analysis revealed that dysfunctional impulsivity predicts perpetration of trolling, but only if the individual has medium or high levels of trait psychopathy. Results of the current study aid in further conceptualising the personality of the Internet “troll”. Future research should further explore antisocial online behaviours, such as other hostile behaviour that occurs on LBRTD apps.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    The article explores how the mobile app Tinder complements dating practices and the wider app ecosystem gay men use in London. Within the local gay community discourse, Tinder is said to be a site where the gay “nice guys” go, rendering the platform as a socially constructed environment where gay men behave in a diametrically opposed way to the normative hyper-sexualized behavior of widespread gay hook-up apps. The research question, therefore, is whether Tinder is in fact a place where these “nice guys” go and where one would find them. Through an ethnographic methodology conducted both online and offline, a case is built on how initial conceptions about the app cannot be fully studied or interpreted without understanding the place it holds among other social networks. Evidence is presented to support the case that gay users of Tinder do, in fact, curate the portrayal of their digital identity to present a considerably less sexualized persona with the hopes of finding dates or a relationship. This, however, does not mean that users refrain from using other platforms in parallel as a way of exploring different subject positions and motivations. Behavior and normativity on Tinder are largely explained both by context and also by the design of the platform, which imports and displays personal data from other social networks. Findings should be limited to the population and location proposed as the fieldsite.
  • Article
    Dating apps on smartphones have brought speed dating on the Internet to a new level. This exploratory investigation sought to determine what kinds of people use these apps, what their motivations are, and what precautions they take before meeting someone. One hundred and seventy-three non-users and 57 current users of dating apps were surveyed. The data suggest that the strongest motive for using dating apps is not for dating or sex, but for entertainment. On the other hand, the more frequent users of these apps are people whose personalities are predisposed towards varied sexual partners. These different motives may represent a disconnect between those who wish to kill time and those who are seeking sexual partners.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Although the smartphone application Tinder is increasingly popular among emerging adults, no empirical study has yet investigated why emerging adults use Tinder. Therefore, we aimed to identify the primary motivations of emerging adults to use Tinder. The study was conducted among Dutch 18-30 year old emerging adults who completed an online survey. Over half of the sample were current or former Tinder users (n = 163). An exploratory factor analysis, using a parallel analysis approach, uncovered six motivations to use Tinder: Love, Casual Sex, Ease of Communication, Self-Worth Validation, Thrill of Excitement, and Trendiness. In contrast to previously suggested, the Love motivation appeared to be a stronger motivation to use Tinder than the Casual Sex motivation. In line with literature on online dating, men were more likely to report a Casual Sex motivation for using Tinder than women. In addition, men more frequently reported Ease of Communication and Thrill of Excitement motives. With regard to age, the motivation Love, Casual Sex and Ease of Communication were positively related to age. Finally, Tinder motivations were meaningfully related to offline encounters with Tinder matches. In sum, the study showed that emerging adults have six primary motivations to use Tinder and that these motivations differ according to one's age and gender. Tinder should not be seen as merely a fun, hookup app without any strings attached, but as a new way for emerging adults to initiate committed romantic relationships. Notably, the findings call for a more encompassing perspective on why emerging adults use Tinder.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Despite common stereotypes about those who use different types of online dating, psychological research on online dating agency users’ characteristics is actually very limited, and no scientific study has yet examined the individual characteristics of Tinder™ users. The current exploratory study aimed to investigate why individuals use these services, and how they differ in terms of sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness, with the aim of stimulating further research in the field. Participants (N = 75) were recruited over social media and completed questionnaires assessing motivation to use online dating, sociability, self-esteem, and sexual permissiveness. No differences were found in motivations, suggesting that people may use both Online Dating Agencies and Tinder™ for similar reasons. Tinder users in the current sample were younger than online dating agency users, which accounted for observed group differences in sexual permissiveness. There were no differences in self-esteem or sociability between the groups. Men were more likely than women to use both types of dating to find casual sex partners than women. Men also scored more highly on a measure of sexual permissiveness than women. These findings support previous research in indicating that users of both Tinder™ and Online Dating Agencies do not differ from the general population.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Background and aims Tinder is a very popular smartphone-based geolocated dating application. The goal of the present study was creating a short Problematic Tinder Use Scale (PTUS). Methods Griffiths' ( 2005 ) six-component model was implemented for covering all components of problematic Tinder use. Confirmatory factor analyses were carried out on a Tinder user sample (N = 430). Results Both the 12- and the 6-item versions were tested. The 6-item unidimensional structure has appropriate reliability and factor structure. No salient demography-related differences were found. Users irrespectively to their relationship status have similar scores on PTUS. Discussion Tinder users deserve the attention of scientific examination considering their large proportion among smartphone users. It is especially true considering the emerging trend of geolocated online dating applications. Conclusions Before PTUS, no prior scale has been created to measure problematic Tinder use. The PTUS is a suitable and reliable measure to assess problematic Tinder use.
  • Article
    Full-text available
    Brief measures of individual differences are growing in popularity. The Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling et al., 2003) increases administration efficiency and maintains construct validity, but sacrifices some internal consistency when measuring the Big Five personality traits. In a survey of 360 college students, we attempted to replicate and extend the construct validity of the TIPI by relating it to sociosexuality and self-esteem. We replicated some of the most well documented Big Five correlations: Self-esteem was negatively correlated with neuroticism and positively with extraversion; sociosexuality was positively correlated with extraversion and negatively with agreeableness. Results suggest the TIPI measure is reasonably valid.