Murgia et al. Perceptual Information in Complex Movements
AUDITORY INFORMATION IN SPORT,
EXERCISE AND REHABILITATION
The first contribution of this section is a review by Schaffert
et al., describing the mutual influences between complex
movement and sound. The authors critically analyze the
studies on ecological sounds and movement sonification
in sports and those on rhythmic auditory information and
sonification in rehabilitation. The next two contributions
address two methodological issues. The contribution by
Schmitz et al. proposes a new method based on movement
sonification for the rehabilitation of patients with stroke. In
particular, the authors contribute a “Clinical study protocol
article,” describing a protocol that provides auditory real-time
feedback on upper limb movement, aimed at helping patients
participating to a motor rehabilitation program after stroke.
The work by Ghiselli et al. illustrates three clinical cases of
children with congenital hearing impairment engaged in
non-instrumental musical training. The authors describe this
training and its effects on cognitive and motor skills, discussing
the preliminary evidence of this method and its potential
clinical relevance.
The last two contributions of this section are original
research articles. The study by Ghai et al. investigates the
effects of auditory feedback in real-time to facilitate knee
proprioception. The authors provide empirical evidence that
the use of auditory feedback improves the accuracy of knee
re-positioning and that this effect can be modulated with
step-wise transposition of frequency. The authors discuss the
potential applications of their finding in rehabilitation settings.
Conversely, the last work of this section—by Kreutz et al.—
concerns the effects of loud music in sports, and in particular
on ergometer exercise. The authors investigate the effects of
electronicmusic,manipulating the intensity levels, and evaluated
the ergometer performance, the perceived fatigue and the heart
rate in university students with relatively high and low levels
of training.
AUDITORY AND VISUAL INFORMATION IN
MOTOR LEARNING AND IMAGERY
This section includes those contributions examining the effects
of auditory and visual cues (either compared or combined)
on movement or imagery. The study by Bienkiewicz et al.
investigates whether auditory and visual cues regarding the
kinematic of experts can enhance motor learning in golf,
demonstrating that both auditory and visual cues can be
beneficial for novices. Bläsing et al. focus on motor learning in
dance. They compare visual cues and verbal instructions and
show that the latter are more effective than the former, when
learning dance movements. Finally, Yu et al. investigate the
lower limb imagery alone or combined with visual or audiovisual
stimuli, using neurophysiological measures. They find that the
visual-auditory stimuli produce the most valuable effects, with
important implications for motor learning and rehabilitation.
VISUAL INFORMATION AND MOTOR
EXPERTISE
This section starts with the contribution by Kurz and Munzert,
who present a mini review on football penalty takers and
eye movements. In particular, they analyze how experimental
artificial conditions influence gaze behavior. The second
contribution of this section is an original study by Vickers
et al.. The authors investigated the role of quiet eye in
basketball, and in particular they focused on the timing
and the location of fixations, and on the effect of the defender on
performance, in three-point shots. The next contribution—by
Jackson et al.—further analyzes the role of visual perception in
football. In this case, the authors used the spatial and temporal
occlusion paradigms to investigate the ability to discriminate
between genuine and deceptive actions, and examined the
sensitivity to different sources of visual information of
the opponent.
The third article of this section is by Bläsing and Sauzet
and investigates the perception of action in the domain of
dance. In particular, the authors analyze the participants’
ability to recognize point-light displays of dance-like actions,
previously performed by the same participants. The next
article is by Marchal-Crespo et al. and deals with different
training strategies to enhance motor learning. In their work,
the authors focus on the learning process of a modified
gait pattern, and compared the haptic error modulation and
the visual error amplification strategies. Finally, this section
ends with the contribution by Castañer et al., who study
the laterality profile and the approach of young athletes
on a novel perceptual-motor situation. In particular, they
examine how the athletes use the limbs and investigated their
spatial orientation.
INTERPERSONAL COORDINATION AND
SENSORY INFORMATION
The last section of this special issue is dedicated to original
studies on interpersonal coordination, interactions among actors,
and perception of others’ point of view. The first contribution
of this section is by Hwang et al., who examine the social
coupling between two individuals in a collaborative task. They
manipulate the perceptual information available, by combining
visual information with different types of auditory feedback. The
next study by van Opstal et al. focuses on the investigation of
interception, using a doubles-pong task. In particular, the authors
study how teams intercept approaching balls, when teams are
composed of two different level players. The third study of this
section is by Meerhoff et al., who focus on collision avoidance.
In their study, the authors examine the strategies of dyadic
avoidance compared to triadic avoidance, and how locomotor
interactions are influenced by the dynamics of a passable gap
between two walkers. Finally, the last contribution of this section
(and of the entire article collection) is by Cook et al.. In this
study, the authors investigate how naturally produced virtual
motion can affect postural regulation. Moreover, they study the
Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 2 November 2019 | Volume 10 | Article 2696
Murgia et al. Perceptual Information in Complex Movements
response to different types of optical flow, which was produced
by other individuals.
FINAL REMARKS
As editors, we are fully satisfied with this collection of articles
and are convinced that most of them will have a high impact
on research in this field.We hope that these works will stimulate
new ideas, and contribute to the development of research on the
mutual influences between auditory and visual perception and
complex movements.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
MM, TA, and PM contributed equally to the development of
the outline of this editorial. MM wrote the first draft, which was
revised and edited by TA and PM. All the authors approved the
final version of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Abernethy, B., Schorer, J., Jackson, R. C., and Hagemann, N. (2012). Perceptual
training methods compared: the relative efficacy of different approaches to
enhancing sport-specific anticipation. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 18, 143–153.
doi: 10.1037/a0028452
Allerdissen,M., Güldenpenning, I., Schack, T., and Bläsing, B. (2017). Recognizing
fencing attacks from auditory and visual information: a comparison
between expert fencers and novices. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 31, 123–130.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.04.009
Bailey, C. A., Corona, F., Murgia, M., Pili, R., Pau, M., and Côté, J. N. (2018).
Electromyographical gait characteristics in Parkinson’s Disease: effects of
combined physical therapy and rhythmic auditory stimulation. Front. Neurol.
9:211. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00211
Camponogara, I., Rodger, M., Craig, C., and Cesari, P. (2017). Expert players
accurately detect an opponent’s movement intentions through sound alone. J
Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 43, 348–359. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000316
Murgia, M., Pili, R., Corona, F., Sors, F., Agostini, T. A., Bernardis, P., et al.
(2018). The use of footstep sounds as rhythmic auditory stimulation for gait
rehabilitation in Parkinson’s Disease: a randomized controlled trial. Front.
Neurol. 9:348. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00348
Murgia, M., Prpic, V., O, J., McCullagh, P., Santoro, I., Galmonte, A., et al.
(2017). Modality and perceptual-motor experience influence the detection
of temporal deviations in tap dance sequences. Front. Psychol. 8:1340.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01340
Nalepka, P., Kallen, R.W., Chemero, A., Saltzman, E., and Richardson,M. J. (2017).
Herd those sheep: emergent multiagent coordination and behavioral-mode
switching. Psychol. Sci. 28, 630–650. doi: 10.1177/0956797617692107
Pizzera, A., Hohmann, T., Streese, L., Habbig, A., and Raab, M. (2017). Long-term
effects of acoustic reafference training (ART). Eur. J. Sport Sci. 17, 1279–1288.
doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1381767
Sors, F., Lath, F., Bader, A., Santoro, I., Galmonte, A., Agostini, T., et al. (2018).
Predicting the length of volleyball serves: the role of early auditory and visual
information. PLoS ONE 13:e0208174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208174
Thaut, M. H., McIntosh, G. C., and Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological
foundations of neurologic music therapy: rhythmic entrainment and
the motor system. Front. Psychol. 5:1185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.
01185
Travassos, B., Araújo, D., Vilar, L., and McGarry, T. (2011). Interpersonal
coordination and ball dynamics in futsal (indoor football). Hum. Movement
Sci. 30, 1245–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.04.003
Williams, A. M., and Jackson, R. C. (2019). Anticipation in sport: fifty years on,
what have we learned and what research still needs to be undertaken? Psychol.
Sport Exerc. 42, 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.014
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a
potential conflict of interest.
Copyright © 2019 Murgia, Agostini and McCullagh. This is an open-access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the
original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original
publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice.
No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these
terms.