- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Journal of Cognitive Enhancement
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Online-based Mindfulness Training Reduces Behavioral Markers
of Mind Wandering
Ida H Bennike
1
&Anders Wieghorst
1
&Ulrich Kirk
1
Received: 23 January 2017 / Accepted: 4 April 2017 /Published online: 25 April 2017
#Springer International Publishing 2017
Abstract It is estimated that people spend almost half their
waking hours lost in stimulus-independent thought, or mind
wandering, which in turn has been shown to negatively impact
well-being. This has sparked a rise in the number of cognitive
training platforms that aim to boost executive functioning, yet
it is unclear whether mind wandering can be reduced through
online training. The current study aimed to investigate wheth-
er behavioral markers of mind wandering can be reduced
through two short-term online-based interventions: mindful-
ness meditation and brain training. Using a randomized con-
trolled design, we assigned one group of participants to
30 days of mindfulness training (n= 54) and another to 30 days
of brain training (n= 41). Mind wandering and dispositional
mindfulness were assessed pre- and post-intervention via the
Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) and the
Mindful Attention to Awareness Scale (MAAS), respectively.
We found significant reductions in mind wandering and sig-
nificant increases in dispositional mindfulness in the mindful-
ness training group but not the brain training group. A lack of
any significant change in the brain training group may be
driven by methodological limitations such as self-report bias.
These results indicate that short online mindfulness-based in-
terventions may be effective in reducing mind wandering.
Keywords Mindfulness .Mind wandering .Cognitive
training
Introduction
Mind wandering involves thinking about events or experi-
ences unrelated to the task at hand. It has been estimated that
mind wandering occupies up to 46% of our waking lives and
been shown to negatively impact subjective well-being
(Killingsworth and Gilbert 2010). Some studies suggest that
mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) may be effective at
reducing mind wandering (e.g. Levinson et al. 2014). In ad-
dition, there has been a recent surge in the number of
mindfulness-based smartphone apps, as well as the number
of online platforms that aim to increase cognitive performance
and enhance well-being through cognitive training. Thus, the
main aim of this study was to investigate whether a laboratory-
based behavioral marker of mind wandering would decrease
following two types of online-based cognitive training inter-
ventions: anMBI and cognitive training.
Behavioral markers of mind wandering are frequently mea-
sured in the laboratory via the Sustained Attention to
Response Task or SART (Robertson et al. 1997). The perfor-
mance markers of the SART are among the most carefully
validated and commonly used indirect measures of mind wan-
dering (Mrazek et al. 2012). The SART requires subjects to
respond to sequentially presented targets and to withhold
responding when infrequent targets are presented centrally
on an otherwise black screen. According to Robertson et al.
(1997), ‘sustained attention’can be defined as task-relevant
processing during monotonous tasks that encourage automat-
ic, mindless responding, and susceptibility to distractors (both
endogenous and exogenous in origin) that can induce off-task
behavior. This type of off-task behavior can be captured by the
SART. Specifically, the SART is designed such that the auto-
matic response is the ‘default’, thereby encouraging a habitual
response pattern that must be periodically overwritten by a
conscious executive decision to refrain from responding.
Ida H Bennike and Anders Wieghorst contributed equally to this work.
*Ulrich Kirk
ukirk@health.sdu.dk
1
Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark,
5230 Odense, Denmark
J Cogn Enhanc (2017) 1:172–181
DOI 10.1007/s41465-017-0020-9
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.