Content uploaded by Mahmoud Yaish
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mahmoud Yaish on Apr 22, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Article
Screening of Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.)
Cultivars for Salinity Tolerance
Latifa Al Kharusi 1, Dekoum V. M. Assaha 1, Rashid Al-Yahyai 2and Mahmoud W. Yaish 1, *
1Department of Biology, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 36, 123 Muscat, Oman;
latifakharusi@gmail.com (L.A.K.); mariusdekoum@yahoo.com (D.V.M.A.)
2Department of Crop Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University,
P.O. Box 34, 123 Muscat, Oman; alyahyai@squ.edu.om
*Correspondence: myaish@squ.edu.om; Tel.: +968-24146823
Academic Editors: Jarmo K. Holopainen and Timothy A. Martin
Received: 17 March 2017; Accepted: 20 April 2017; Published: 22 April 2017
Abstract:
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is a major fruit tree in the Middle East and it is a plant
considered to be tolerant to a variety of abiotic stresses, including salinity. However, the physiological
basis of its salinity tolerance is not fully known. The objective of this study was to screen Omani
date palm cultivars for tolerance or susceptibility to salt stress. Seedlings from 10 commercially
important date palm cultivars were subjected to 240 mM NaCl, and several physiological parameters
related to salinity tolerance traits were evaluated upon treatment. The cultivars were divided into
two groups based on the dry weight (DW) of their leaf and root tissues, a parameter which was used
as an indication of healthy growth. The results revealed that photosynthesis, electrolyte leakage (EL),
and the shoot K
+
/Na
+
ratio were all significantly reduced in the susceptible cultivars. In addition,
the relative water content was higher in the tolerant cultivars in comparison with the susceptible
ones. These results suggest that although date palm is tolerant to high salinity, there is variation in
tolerance among different cultivars. Shoot Na
+
exclusion, photosynthesis, and membrane stability
are apparently the main determinants of tolerance and can be used in salinity tolerance screening
of date palm. The results have shown new very tolerant cultivars (Manoma and Umsila) that could
serve as genetic resources for improved date palm tolerance to salinity.
Keywords:
date palm; salt stress; screening; tolerance; susceptible; photosynthesis;
sodium; potassium
1. Introduction
Saline environments present a major worldwide threat to agriculture, resulting partly from the
irrigation of arable lands with salt-containing water. Global annual losses in agricultural crops due to
salinization add up to more than US $12 billion [
1
]. Salinity is a multifactorial trait, the first effects of
which are osmotic, whereby the presence of high concentrations of NaCl inhibits water uptake, leading
to slow growth or growth arrest and eventual death for sensitive plants [
2
]. This osmotic component
is very severe because it induces stomatal closure via abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathways, with
a consequential reduction in gas exchange and hence the rate of photosynthesis [
3
]. In addition
to osmotic stress, Na
+
is known to affect chlorophyll [
4
], an essential pigment for photosynthetic
machinery, leading to high biomass reduction [5].
Both excess Na
+
accumulation and osmotic stress often induce secondary stresses, including
oxidative stress and nutrient deficiency. Oxidative stress results from the production of reactive oxygen
species (ROS) (mainly O
2−
) in the electron transport chains of photosynthesis (chloroplast), respiration
(mitochondria), and photorespiration (peroxisomes). These ROS often degrade membrane lipids
through peroxidation, leading to electrolyte leakage and, consequently, the obstruction of cellular
Forests 2017,8, 136; doi:10.3390/f8040136 www.mdpi.com/journal/forests
Forests 2017,8, 136 2 of 14
functions and cell death [
6
]. Thus, tolerance to salt stress can be evaluated on the basis of a plant’s ability
to prevent or reduce electrolyte leakage or to maintain membrane integrity under saline conditions.
An important component of these leaked electrolytes is potassium ions (K
+
). K
+
is essential for almost
all stages of plant development, and it also intervenes in most physiological processes, including pH
regulation, the maintenance of membrane potentials, nyctinastic leaf movements, stomatal aperture
regulation, and protein trafficking [
7
]. Owing to these multiple functions of K
+
, K
+
homeostasis under
salt stress has become the focus of stress tolerance studies. Particularly, the cytosolic and, to a lesser
extent, tissue K
+
/Na
+
ratio is known to be a key salt stress tolerance trait and a strong determinant of
salt stress tolerance [
8
]. Excess Na
+
in the soil often inhibits the uptake of other elements, resulting
in nutrient deficiency. This inhibition is more pronounced on K
+
than it is on other elements, since
both Na
+
and K
+
have similar physico-chemical characteristics, with Na
+
often negatively interfering
with K
+
-dependent processes, such as enzyme activation. This results in the interruption of metabolic
processes such as photosynthesis, as K
+
is involved in the activation of many photosynthetic pathway
enzymes [
9
]. Therefore, Na
+
exclusion, especially from the leaf, is often beneficial in protecting essential
metabolic processes such as photosynthesis, which is crucial for biomass production. In this regard,
many plants have developed efficient exclusion mechanisms, including extruding Na
+
from the root
cells into the soil, the retrieval of Na
+
from the xylem vessels into the xylem parenchyma cells, and
the recirculation of Na
+
from shoot to root and eventually back to the soil via the phloem [
10
–
13
].
Furthermore, tissue tolerance, such as vacuolar Na
+
sequestration in the leaf, is equally important
as it offers cheap osmoticum for cell turgor, as opposed to organic solute synthesis, which is of high
metabolic cost for plants [11].
Adaptation to salinity is highly variable among plant species, cultivars of the same species,
and even among individuals of the same cultivar, making the stress very complex and exceedingly
difficult to overcome even through genetic engineering, since it is multigenic in nature [
14
]. Therefore,
establishing the differential salt stress tolerance among cultivars through screening would yield useful
genetic resources for crop breeding. This has been very successful in many cereals, including rice [
15
]
and wheat [16].
Date palm is a monocot and staple fruit in many arid and semi-arid regions of the Middle East
and North Africa. It has over 100 cultivars and basically, little is known about the adaptation of these
plants to salinity, and the few available studies employ only a very few cultivars (generally one to
four) [
17
–
24
]. This is a serious deficit, because salinity is encroaching on vast swathes of arable land,
including the areas where these date palms are grown. These regions are dry and the absence of
fresh water forces growers to resort to salt-containing water for irrigation, which often results in the
accumulation of salts in these soils. Some of these cultivars, especially those growing along coastal
areas, are known to be tolerant and capable of growing in salinities of over 300 mM NaCl [
25
,
26
], while
others show sensitivity at the same salinity level. However, the physiological basis of this tolerance
or sensitivity is not fully known. Thus, screening these cultivars for salt stress tolerance can yield
valuable information on the adaptive mechanisms of these plants and provide resources for improved
date palm production in these marginal areas.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to screen cultivars of date palms growing in farms of
different salinity levels in Oman and to establish the mechanisms of adaptation that they employ to
tolerate salt stress. We thus sought to answer two fundamental questions: do these cultivars have
similar adaptive mechanisms to salt stress? If different, what are the main defining tolerance or
susceptibility traits endowed in each cultivar or group of cultivars?
Forests 2017,8, 136 3 of 14
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plants, Seed Germination, and Growth Conditions
Date palm is a dioecious plant. In order to reduce the paternal genetic background variation,
a single pollen grain source was selected to produce seeds for 10 date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.)
cultivars (Zabad, Umsila, Nagal, Abunarenja, Fard, HilaliOmani, Nashukharma, Barni, Manoma, and
Khalas). The pollination process was manually carried out at the Agricultural Experimental Station
(AES) of Sultan Qaboos University. These 10 cultivars were chosen because they are known to grow in
salted-affected areas.
After complete ripening, the fruits were collected and the seeds were extracted and used in the
experiment. The seeds were germinated in sterilized moist vermiculite at 35
◦
C. Immediately after
radicle emergence, seeds were transplanted into 2-L pots filled with peat moss and Perlite (2:1, v/v).
The soil contained 0.5 g NPK (20:5:10, including micro-nutrients) fertilizer. Plants were kept in a
glasshouse under natural sunlight conditions and at a constant temperature of 30
◦
C. Five weeks after
germination, the seedlings were fertilized again using the same fertilizer dosage.
The electrical conductivity (EC), temperature, and moisture content of the soil in the pots were
monitored using data loggers (DECAGON, Em50, 2012, Pullman, WA, USA). For establishment, the
pots were irrigated with only tap water for two weeks. Then the pots were arranged in a completely
randomized experimental design and subjected to 0 mM (control) and 240 mM NaCl (salt stress).
Each treatment had four replicates and each replicate consisted of a pot containing a single plant.
The plants were monitored under the treatments for 30 days. At the end, measurements were carried
out and samples collected for various physiological analyses.
2.2. Plant Growth and Leaf Area Measurements
The plants were separated into shoots and roots and their fresh weights were recorded, then the
samples were dried at 80
◦
C in an oven for 48 h and their dry weights were recorded. The leaf area of
each plant was determined using a portable area meter (CI-202, Camas, WA, USA). Portions of these
samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen stored at −80 ◦C.
2.3. Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurements
Gas exchange measurements were taken between 9:00 am and 11:00 am on one leaf of each plant
after four weeks of treatment, using a portable photosynthesis system (LCpro-SD, ADC BioScientific,
Hoddesdon, UK). Each measurement was taken for 60 min after placing the leaf in the leaf cuvette.
The parameters recorded include net photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration
rate (E), and intercellular CO
2
concentration (C
i
). The reference CO
2
was maintained at a rate of
600
µ
molCO
2
/mol and a photosynthetic flux density of 869
µ
mol m
−2
s
−1
. Water use efficiency
(WUE) was calculated as: WUE = A/E. The ratio of variable to maximum chlorophyll fluorescence
(Fv/Fm) as a parameter for the maximum quantum yield efficiency of photosystem II was measured on
dark-adapted leaves, using a rapid screening fluorometer (Pocket Pea, Hansatech Instruments, King’s
Lynn, London, UK). The values obtained from the fluorometer were analyzed with the PEA software.
2.4. Measurement of Na+and K+Concentrations
The shoot and root samples were dried at 80
◦
C for 48 h and weighed. The dried samples
were later digested with concentrated HNO
3
acid and H
2
O
2
(5:1 v:v), as previously described [
27
].
The Na
+
and K
+
concentrations in the digested samples were measured using a flame photometer
(Microprocessor Flame Photometer, Electronics India, Model 1382, Parwanoo, Himachal Pradesh, India
against known concentrations of Na+and K+.
Forests 2017,8, 136 4 of 14
2.5. Chlorophyll Concentration
For the chlorophyll concentration of the leaves, chlorophyll was extracted from four leaf discs with
80% acetone, and the absorbance of the resulting extracts was measured by spectrophotometry (Thermo
SPECTRONIC, Helios, Madison, WI, USA) at wavelengths of 646 nm and 663 nm. The chlorophyll
concentration in (mg/g fw) was then calculated following the method of [28].
2.6. Relative Water Content
The relative water content was measured according to [
29
,
30
]. The fresh leaf tissues were weighed
to get the fresh weight (FW) before being placed in Petri-dishes with water and incubated at room
temperature for 24 h. The tissues were later taken out, blotted dry, and weighed to get the turgid
weight (TW). Subsequently, the samples were dried at 80
◦
C for 24 h and weighed again to obtain the
dry weight (DW). The relative water content (RWC) was then calculated according to the formula:
RWC = (FW −DW/TW −DW) ×100.
2.7. Electrolyte Leakage
Electrolyte leakage was measured according to [
31
]. The fresh leaf samples were placed in vials
with 10 ml of deionized water and shacked at 100 rpm for 24 h at room temperature. The first electrolyte
leakage (EC
1
) was then recorded. Next, maximum conductivity (EC
2
) was obtained by placing the
vials in the autoclave (Aster, Inc., Placentia, CA, USA) at 120
◦
C for 20 min. The result was then
recorded. Electrolyte leakage was calculated as: electrolyte leakage = (EC
1
/EC
2
)
×
100. The values
were expressed as a percentage of maximum conductivity.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed by using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the SPSS
statistical package version 21 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The means were separated using
Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at p= 0.05. The data were checked for normality using
exploratory data analysis in SPSS. Normal distributions were determined using the Shapiro-Wilk Test
at p> 0.05, and skewness between
−
1.0 and +1.0. Correlation between measured parameters was
carried out in SPSS using Pearson’s correlation analysis and data were displayed as the Pearson’s
correlation coefficient (r) and p-values. Analysis of variance (two-way-ANOVA) was used to study the
interaction effects between the cultivars and treatments for all measured parameters.
3. Results
3.1. Effects of Salinity on Growth
The effect of salinity was investigated on the seedlings of 10 date palm cultivars in a glasshouse
under controlled conditions. Statistical analysis based on the growth data, expressed as the DW
percentage of the control of all 10 cultivars, revealed two distinct growth patterns that can be used to
separate the cultivars into two categories (Figure 1).
The first category comprises Zabad, HilaliOmani, Nashukharma, Khalas, Barni, and Abunarenja,
while the second category is composed of Manoma, Umsila, Fard, and Nagal cultivars. It was observed
that under salt stress, the root and shoot DW of the cultivars in the first category was lower than in
the cultivars of the second category. Among all 10 cultivars, Manoma had the highest shoot growth
(113% of the control), whereas Zabad had the lowest (28% of the control). Under salt stress, visual
symptoms such as leaf tip burn were only found in Zabad, which appeared to be the most sensitive to
salinity among the cultivars in the first category.
Forests 2017,8, 136 5 of 14
Forests2017,8,136 5of14
Figure1.Effectofsalinity(240mMNaCl)ontheshootandrootgrowthoftolerant(A)and
susceptible(B)datepalms.Datawerepresentedasapercentageofthecontrol.Barsrepresentmean±
SE(n=3).
3.2.PhotosynthesisandQuantumYieldEfficiencyofPSIIActivity
Sincephotosyntheticefficiencyisdirectlyrelatedtobiomassproductioninplants,thenet
photosyntheticrate(A),stomatalconductance(gs),transpiration(E),andinternalCO
2
concentration
(C
i
)inallthecultivarsweremeasuredundercontrolandsaltstressconditions.Thedataobtained
showedasignificantreduction(p≤0.05)inalloftheparametersandineachofthe10cultivarsin
responsetosalinitytreatment(Figure2).However,thereductioninAwaslessinManomaand
Umsila(39%and40%,respectively)thanintheothercultivarscomparedtothecontrol,whileitwas
mostsignificantlyreduced(p≤0.05)inZabad(62%)(Figure2A).All10cultivarshadsignificantly
reducedC
i
comparedtothecontrol(p≤0.05)(Figure2B).Thegsalsodeclinedsignificantlyinallthe
cultivars(p≤0.05),butthedecreasewaslessinUmsila(70%)andManoma(72%),andthehighest
wasinNashukharma(92%)comparedtothecontrol.ThehighestEwasrecordedinUmsila(12%
reduction)andManoma(13%reduction),whileZabadshowedthelowest(97%reduction)(Figure
2C,D).TheWUEofFard,Umsila,andManomaunderstresswasnotsignificantlydifferentfromthe
control(p≤0.05),butmarkedlyincreasedinHilaliOmaniandZabad(95.9%and89.2%,respectively)
(Figure2E).ForthequantumyieldofPSIIactivity,althoughtherewerenosignificantdifferences
amongthecultivars(p≤0.05),lowerreductionswereobservedinManoma(23%reduction),Fard
(24%reduction),andUmsila(24.4%reduction)comparedtothecontrol,whereasamarked
reductionwasobservedinZabad(57%reduction)(Figure2F).
Figure 1.
Effect of salinity (240 mM NaCl) on the shoot and root growth of tolerant (
A
) and susceptible
(B) date palms. Data were presented as a percentage of the control. Bars represent mean ±SE (n= 3).
3.2. Photosynthesis and Quantum Yield Efficiency of PSII Activity
Since photosynthetic efficiency is directly related to biomass production in plants, the net
photosynthetic rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (E), and internal CO
2
concentration
(C
i
) in all the cultivars were measured under control and salt stress conditions. The data obtained
showed a significant reduction (p
≤
0.05) in all of the parameters and in each of the 10 cultivars
in response to salinity treatment (Figure 2). However, the reduction in Awas less in Manoma and
Umsila (39% and 40%, respectively) than in the other cultivars compared to the control, while it was
most significantly reduced (p
≤
0.05) in Zabad (62%) (Figure 2A). All 10 cultivars had significantly
reduced C
i
compared to the control (p
≤
0.05) (Figure 2B). The gs also declined significantly in all
the cultivars (p
≤
0.05), but the decrease was less in Umsila (70%) and Manoma (72%), and the
highest was in Nashukharma (92%) compared to the control. The highest Ewas recorded in Umsila
(12% reduction) and Manoma (13% reduction), while Zabad showed the lowest (97% reduction)
(Figure 2C,D). The WUE of Fard, Umsila, and Manoma under stress was not significantly different
from the control (p
≤
0.05), but markedly increased in HilaliOmani and Zabad (95.9% and 89.2%,
respectively) (Figure 2E). For the quantum yield of PSII activity, although there were no significant
differences among the cultivars (p
≤
0.05), lower reductions were observed in Manoma (23% reduction),
Fard (24% reduction), and Umsila (24.4% reduction) compared to the control, whereas a marked
reduction was observed in Zabad (57% reduction) (Figure 2F).
Forests 2017,8, 136 6 of 14
Forests2017,8,136 6of14
Figure2.Effectofsalinityon(A)Photosynthesisrate(A);(B)IntercellularCO
2
concentration(Ci);(C)
Stomatalconductance(gs);(D)Transpirationrate(E);(E)Wateruseefficiency(WUE);and(F)
Quantumyield(Qy)indatepalmcultivarswhenexposedto0mMand240mMNaCl.Barsrepresent
mean±SE(n=3).Significant(p≤0.05)differencesaremarkedwithanasterisk.
3.3.EffectofSaltStressonLeafArea
Sinceleafareaisdirectlycorrelatedwiththephotosyntheticrate[32],theleafareaofthe10
cultivarswasmeasuredundercontrolandsaltstressconditions.ExceptforFard(whoseleafarea
wasunaltered),ManomaandUmsilahadthelowestreductioninleafarea(10%and12%,
respectively)comparedtothecontrol,whiletheleafareadeclinedsignificantlyundersaltstress(p≤
0.05)inalloftheothercultivars,withthehighestdeclineobservedinNashukharma(39%)(Figure3).
Figure 2.
Effect of salinity on (
A
) Photosynthesis rate (A); (
B
) Intercellular CO
2
concentration
(Ci); (
C
) Stomatal conductance (gs); (
D
) Transpiration rate (E); (
E
) Water use efficiency (WUE); and
(
F
) Quantum yield (Qy) in date palm cultivars when exposed to 0 mM and 240 mM NaCl. Bars represent
mean ±SE (n= 3). Significant (p ≤0.05) differences are marked with an asterisk.
3.3. Effect of Salt Stress on Leaf Area
Since leaf area is directly correlated with the photosynthetic rate [
32
], the leaf area of the
10 cultivars was measured under control and salt stress conditions. Except for Fard (whose leaf area
was unaltered), Manoma and Umsila had the lowest reduction in leaf area (10% and 12%, respectively)
compared to the control, while the leaf area declined significantly under salt stress (p≤0.05) in all of
the other cultivars, with the highest decline observed in Nashukharma (39%) (Figure 3).
Forests 2017,8, 136 7 of 14
Forests2017,8,136 7of14
Figure3.Effectofsalinityontheleafarea(LA)ofdatepalmcultivarsexposedto0and240mM
NaCl.Barsrepresentmean±SE(n=3).Significant(p≤0.05)differencesaremarkedwithanasterisk.
3.4.EffectofSaltStressonTotalChlorophyllConcentration
Chlorophyllisanessentialmoleculeforthecaptureandtransferofenergyinthephotosynthetic
machinery[33].Todeterminewhetherthedifferenceinphotosyntheticrateamongthecultivarsis
relatedtodifferencesinchlorophyllconcentrationundersaltstress,thechlorophyllconcentrationof
theleavesofthecontrolandsalt‐treatedplantswasdetermined.Theresultsshowedasignificant
reductioninchlorophyllconcentrationforall10cultivars(p≤0.05),withamorethan50%reduction
comparedtothecontrols(Figure4).
Figure4.Effectofsalinityonchlorophyllconcentrationsofdatepalmcultivarsexposedto0and240
mMNaCl.Barsrepresentmean±SE(n=3).Significant(p≤0.05)differencesaremarkedwithan
asterisk.
Figure 3.
Effect of salinity on the leaf area (LA) of date palm cultivars exposed to 0 and 240 mM NaCl.
Bars represent mean ±SE (n= 3). Significant (p ≤0.05) differences are marked with an asterisk.
3.4. Effect of Salt Stress on Total Chlorophyll Concentration
Chlorophyll is an essential molecule for the capture and transfer of energy in the photosynthetic
machinery [
33
]. To determine whether the difference in photosynthetic rate among the cultivars is
related to differences in chlorophyll concentration under salt stress, the chlorophyll concentration of
the leaves of the control and salt-treated plants was determined. The results showed a significant
reduction in chlorophyll concentration for all 10 cultivars (p≤0.05), with a more than 50% reduction
compared to the controls (Figure 4).
Forests2017,8,136 7of14
Figure3.Effectofsalinityontheleafarea(LA)ofdatepalmcultivarsexposedto0and240mM
NaCl.Barsrepresentmean±SE(n=3).Significant(p≤0.05)differencesaremarkedwithanasterisk.
3.4.EffectofSaltStressonTotalChlorophyllConcentration
Chlorophyllisanessentialmoleculeforthecaptureandtransferofenergyinthephotosynthetic
machinery[33].Todeterminewhetherthedifferenceinphotosyntheticrateamongthecultivarsis
relatedtodifferencesinchlorophyllconcentrationundersaltstress,thechlorophyllconcentrationof
theleavesofthecontrolandsalt‐treatedplantswasdetermined.Theresultsshowedasignificant
reductioninchlorophyllconcentrationforall10cultivars(p≤0.05),withamorethan50%reduction
comparedtothecontrols(Figure4).
Figure4.Effectofsalinityonchlorophyllconcentrationsofdatepalmcultivarsexposedto0and240
mMNaCl.Barsrepresentmean±SE(n=3).Significant(p≤0.05)differencesaremarkedwithan
asterisk.
Figure 4.
Effect of salinity on chlorophyll concentrations of date palm cultivars exposed to 0 and
240 mM NaCl. Bars represent mean
±
SE (n= 3). Significant (p
≤
0.05) differences are marked with
an asterisk.
Forests 2017,8, 136 8 of 14
3.5. Effect of Salt Stress on Relative Water Content (RWC)
It is known that the water status of a plant is important for maintaining cellular and metabolic
functions under salt stress [
34
]. To assess whether reductions in the photosynthetic rate and growth
were due to alterations in the water content of the plants, the RWC of the cultivars was measured
under control and salt stress conditions. While most of the cultivars maintained relatively high RWCs
(>60%), it was significantly reduced in Zabad (<60%) (p≤0.05) under salt stress (Figure 5).
Forests2017,8,136 8of14
3.5.EffectofSaltStressonRelativeWaterContent(RWC)
Itisknownthatthewaterstatusofaplantisimportantformaintainingcellularandmetabolic
functionsundersaltstress[34].Toassesswhetherreductionsinthephotosyntheticrateandgrowth
wereduetoalterationsinthewatercontentoftheplants,theRWCofthecultivarswasmeasured
undercontrolandsaltstressconditions.Whilemostofthecultivarsmaintainedrelativelyhigh
RWCs(>60%),itwassignificantlyreducedinZabad(<60%)(p≤0.05)undersaltstress(Figure5).
Figure5.Effectofsalinityontherelativewatercontent(RWC%)ofdatepalmcultivarsexposedto0
and240mMNaCl.Barsrepresentmean±SE(n=3).Thesignificant(p≤0.05)differencesaremarked
withanasterisk.
3.6.EffectofSaltStressonNa
+
andK
+
Concentrations
ToelucidatethepatternsofNa
+
andK
+
accumulationindatepalmtissuesandtodetermine
whetherthegrowthofthecultivarsundersaltstressisrelatedtothedifferentialNa
+
andK
+
accumulationinthetissues,theNa
+
andK
+
concentrationsinthecultivarsweremeasuredinboththe
rootandleaftissues.Manoma,Umsila,Nagal,andFard(secondcategorycultivars)showeda
tendencytocontrolNa
+
accumulationintheleaves,whileZabad,incontrast,accumulatedmoreNa
+
intheleaftissues.Undersaltstress,ZabadhadthehighestconcentrationofNa
+
intheleaves(25.5
mg/g),whileManomahadthelowestoutofallthecultivars(9.23mg/g),followedbyUmsila(11.73
mg/g)(Figure6A).Overall,Manoma,Umsila,Nagal,andFardmaintainedthelowestconcentrations
ofNa
+
intheleaves.WithregardstoK
+
concentration,undercontrolconditions,BarniandKhalas
hadasignificantlylowerconcentrationofK
+
(p≤0.05)intheleavesthanintherootscomparedwith
othercultivars.Undersaltstress,NashukharmahadthelowestconcentrationofK
+
intheleaves
(5.69mg/gDW)comparedtothecontrol,followedbyZabad(5.78mg/gDW),whileManomahad
thehighestconcentrationoutofallthecultivars(11.15mg/gDW)comparedtothecontrol(Figure
6B).TheNa
+
/K
+
ratiointheleaveswassignificantlyreducedinManoma,whereasitwasthehighest
inZabad(p≤0.05)(Figure6C).
Figure 5.
Effect of salinity on the relative water content (RWC %) of date palm cultivars exposed to 0
and 240 mM NaCl. Bars represent mean
±
SE (n= 3). The significant (p
≤
0.05) differences are marked
with an asterisk.
3.6. Effect of Salt Stress on Na+and K+Concentrations
To elucidate the patterns of Na
+
and K
+
accumulation in date palm tissues and to determine
whether the growth of the cultivars under salt stress is related to the differential Na
+
and K
+
accumulation in the tissues, the Na
+
and K
+
concentrations in the cultivars were measured in both the
root and leaf tissues. Manoma, Umsila, Nagal, and Fard (second category cultivars) showed a tendency
to control Na
+
accumulation in the leaves, while Zabad, in contrast, accumulated more Na
+
in the
leaf tissues. Under salt stress, Zabad had the highest concentration of Na
+
in the leaves (25.5 mg/g),
while Manoma had the lowest out of all the cultivars (9.23 mg/g), followed by Umsila (11.73 mg/g)
(Figure 6A). Overall, Manoma, Umsila, Nagal, and Fard maintained the lowest concentrations of
Na
+
in the leaves. With regards to K
+
concentration, under control conditions, Barni and Khalas had
a significantly lower concentration of K
+
(p
≤
0.05) in the leaves than in the roots compared with
other cultivars. Under salt stress, Nashukharma had the lowest concentration of K
+
in the leaves
(5.69 mg/g DW) compared to the control, followed by Zabad (5.78 mg/g DW), while Manoma had the
highest concentration out of all the cultivars (11.15 mg/g DW) compared to the control (Figure 6B).
The Na
+
/K
+
ratio in the leaves was significantly reduced in Manoma, whereas it was the highest in
Zabad (p≤0.05) (Figure 6C).
Forests 2017,8, 136 9 of 14
Forests2017,8,136 9of14
Figure6.EffectofsalinitytreatmentontheamountsofNa+(A),K+(B),andNa
+
/K
+
ratio(C)
accumulatedintheleavesofdatepalmcultivarsgrownundernormal(0mMNaCl)andsalinity(240
mMNaCl)conditions.Barsrepresentmean±SE(n=3).Significant(p≤0.05)differencesaremarked
withanasterisk.
Figure 6.
Effect of salinity treatment on the amounts of Na+ (
A
), K+ (
B
), and Na
+
/K
+
ratio (
C
)
accumulated in the leaves of date palm cultivars grown under normal (0 mM NaCl)and salinity
(240 mM NaCl) conditions. Bars represent mean
±
SE (n= 3). Significant (p
≤
0.05) differences are
marked with an asterisk.
Forests 2017,8, 136 10 of 14
3.7. Effect of Salt Stress on Electrolyte Leakage (EL)
The maintenance of membrane integrity under salt stress in order to avoid electrolyte leakage is
an important salt tolerance strategy. To determine whether or not NaCl induced membrane damage
in the cultivars, the EL (%) of all the cultivars was measured. The results showed that Umsila and
Manoma had significantly lower electrolyte leakage (7.3% and 8.2%, respectively) (p
≤
0.05) compared
to the control, while Nashukharma and Zabad had higher electrolyte leakage percentages (12.7% and
12.3%, respectively) compared to the control (Figure 7).
Forests2017,8,136 10of14
3.7.EffectofSaltStressonElectrolyteLeakage(EL)
Themaintenanceofmembraneintegrityundersaltstressinordertoavoidelectrolyteleakageis
animportantsalttolerancestrategy.TodeterminewhetherornotNaClinducedmembranedamage
inthecultivars,theEL(%)ofallthecultivarswasmeasured.TheresultsshowedthatUmsilaand
Manomahadsignificantlylowerelectrolyteleakage(7.3%and8.2%,respectively)(p≤ 0.05)
comparedtothecontrol,whileNashukharmaandZabadhadhigherelectrolyteleakagepercentages
(12.7%and12.3%,respectively)comparedtothecontrol(Figure7).
Figure7.Effectofsalinityonelectrolyteleakage(EL%)ofdatepalmcultivarsgrownunder0mM
and240mMNaClconditions.Significant(p≤0.05)differencesaremarkedwithanasterisk.
3.8.InteractionEffectsbetweenCultivarsandTreatments
Correlationsandinteractioneffectsbetweenthecultivarsandtreatmentsbasedondifferent
measuredparameterswerecarriedoutusinganalysisofvariance(two‐way‐ANOVA)andPearson’s
correlationcoefficient(r).Theresultsshowedthatsignificant(p≤0.05)interactioneffectsbetween
cultivarsandtreatmentswerefoundinallmeasuredparametersexceptfortheintercellularCO
2
concentration(Ci)(p=0.444)andthechlorophyllcontent(p=0.555).Dataareshownin
SupplementaryMaterial(TableS1).Anegativesignificant(p=0.0)correlationwasfoundbetween
sodium(Na
+
)anddryweightoftheroots(DWR)andshoottissues(DWS),andalsobetween
electrolyteleakage(EL)andwateruseefficiency(WUE).However,apositivecorrelationwas
observedbetweensodiumconcentration(Na
+
)andelectrolyteleakage(EL),betweenphotosynthetic
rate(A)andthedryweightofshoot(DWS),thestomatalconductance(g),theleafarea(LA),andthe
chlorophyllaandbcontents(Chla+b).DataarepresentedinSupplementaryMaterial(TableS2).
4.Discussion
Thepresentstudysoughttoscreen10datepalmcultivarsforsaltstresstoleranceandto
determinethemechanismsunderlyingtheirtoleranceorsusceptibility.Similarapproacheswere
previouslyusedtoscreensalinitytoleranceincultivarsofotherplantspeciessuchasrice[35]and
wheat[36].However,beforeexaminingthisissue,itisworthnotingthatdatepalmisasalt
stress‐tolerantplantthatisabletowithstandsalinitiesofupto24dS/m[26].Inapreliminary
screeningunderdifferentNaClconcentrations(160,240,and320mM),weobservedthattherewere
nosignificantdifferencesingrowthamongthecultivarsunderconditionsofmoderatesalinity(160
mM)duetoinsufficientsaltstress.Likewise,nosignificantdifferenceswerenoticedwhenthe
cultivarsweresubjectedtohigherlevelssalinity(320mMNaCl),whichwasprobablyduetothe
severestressdecreasingtheirgrowthtosimilarlevelsOnlythe240mMstressconditionproduced
significantdifferencesamongthecultivars,andwasthereforechosenforthisstudy.
Figure 7.
Effect of salinity on electrolyte leakage (EL %) of date palm cultivars grown under 0 mM and
240 mM NaCl conditions. Significant (p≤0.05) differences are marked with an asterisk.
3.8. Interaction Effects between Cultivars and Treatments
Correlations and interaction effects between the cultivars and treatments based on different
measured parameters were carried out using analysis of variance (two-way-ANOVA) and Pearson’s
correlation coefficient (r). The results showed that significant (p
≤
0.05) interaction effects between
cultivars and treatments were found in all measured parameters except for the intercellular CO
2
concentration (Ci) (p= 0.444) and the chlorophyll content (p= 0.555). Data are shown in Supplementary
Material (Table S1). A negative significant (p= 0.0) correlation was found between sodium (Na
+
)
and dry weight of the roots (DWR) and shoot tissues (DWS), and also between electrolyte leakage
(EL) and water use efficiency (WUE). However, a positive correlation was observed between sodium
concentration (Na
+
) and electrolyte leakage (EL), between photosynthetic rate (A) and the dry weight
of shoot (DWS), the stomatal conductance (g), the leaf area (LA), and the chlorophyll a and b contents
(Chla+b). Data are presented in Supplementary Material (Table S2).
4. Discussion
The present study sought to screen 10 date palm cultivars for salt stress tolerance and to determine
the mechanisms underlying their tolerance or susceptibility. Similar approaches were previously used
to screen salinity tolerance in cultivars of other plant species such as rice [
35
] and wheat [
36
]. However,
before examining this issue, it is worth noting that date palm is a salt stress-tolerant plant that is
able to withstand salinities of up to 24 dS/m [
26
]. In a preliminary screening under different NaCl
concentrations (160, 240, and 320 mM), we observed that there were no significant differences in
growth among the cultivars under conditions of moderate salinity (160 mM) due to insufficient salt
stress. Likewise, no significant differences were noticed when the cultivars were subjected to higher
levels salinity (320 mM NaCl), which was probably due to the severe stress decreasing their growth to
similar levels Only the 240 mM stress condition produced significant differences among the cultivars,
and was therefore chosen for this study.
Forests 2017,8, 136 11 of 14
The results under this stress condition (240 mM NaCl) revealed two distinct plant groups based
on growth (Figure 1). The first group, deemed to be salt-sensitive, had a higher percentage of shoot
growth reduction (>60%) when compared to the controls and include Abunarenja, Nashukharma,
Barni, HilaliOmani, Zabad, and Khalas, while in the second group (salt-tolerant), the reduction in
shoot growth was
≤
40% and included Manoma, Umsila, Fard, and Nagal. Statistical analysis showed
a significant interaction effect between cultivars and treatments on both shoot and root dry weight.
Information is presented in Supplementary Material (Table S1). This finding supports the grouping
method used in this study.
A high net photosynthetic rate under salt stress will normally lead to increased biomass production
and hence plant growth, implying that the photosynthetic rate will be directly proportional to salt stress
tolerance. However, salt stress negatively affects various components of the photosynthetic process,
including stomatal closure and the inhibition of mesophyll conductance to CO2 diffusion, which limit
CO2 availability for carboxylation, as well as chlorophyll content and damage to the photosynthetic
machinery, with reduced or arrested electron transport for the production of reductants (NADPH)
and ATP for the Calvin cycle [
21
]. Interestingly, a clear interaction effect between the cultivars and the
treatments in terms of most photosynthesis parameters was found in this study, therefore, this notion
is consistent with the previously published works [21].
Damage to the photosynthetic machinery is often ascertained by measuring the quantum yield
efficiency of PSII (Qy) [
37
]. A reduction in this parameter is an indication of a compromised
photosynthetic system. In the present study, the tolerant cultivars (Umsila, Manoma, Fard, and Nagal)
had a relatively higher Athan the rest of the cultivars under salt stress (Figure 2A), with concomitantly
higher levels of gs and E(Figure 2C,D), clearly indicating that photosynthesis constitutes an important
stress tolerance mechanism in these cultivars. This higher Ais due to a higher gs and E, and limited CO
2
diffusion may be the cause of Areduction in the other cultivars. In the present study, the reduction of Ci
in all 10 cultivars under stress may be due to the direct effect of the reduction in stomatal conductance
(stomatal limitation) [
38
]. The reduction in photosynthesis can be direct, such as a decrease in CO
2
concentration caused by stomatal closure or mesophyll conductance [38,39].
This CO
2
limitation of Ahas previously been reported for other date palm cultivars, including
Khalas, which is used in the present study [
21
,
23
]. Similarly, these same tolerant cultivars maintained
relatively higher Qy levels compared to all of the other cultivars (Figure 1F), as well as a high leaf area
(Figure 3), which indicates that stomatal limitation and damage to photosynthetic machinery are major
contributing factors in photosynthetic reduction and, consequently, growth reduction in the sensitive
cultivars. Chlorophyll concentration, on the contrary, was not consistent with photosynthetic patterns
(r= 0.336, p= 0.034), indicating that it may only play a minor role in the photosynthetic activity of
these cultivars and is thus not a reliable stress tolerance trait. Based on these results and the strong
correlation between Aand growth (r= 0.879, p< 0.000), it can be concluded that photosynthesis is an
important stress tolerance trait in date palms.
Decreased RWC can potentially retard plant growth under salt stress [
40
]. In the present study,
the RWC declined for all the cultivars, but the decline was more pronounced in the susceptible plants
(e.g., Zabad: <60%) (Figure 5). This result indicates that RWC is a contributing factor in stress sensitivity
for some of the sensitive cultivars.
In addition to Cl
−
, Na
+
ions are the most destructive element when plan ts are exposed to
salinity [
41
]. Aside from inducing osmotic stress at the onset of salt stress, its accumulation, especially
in photosynthetic tissues, is highly deleterious as it mainly interferes with K
+
functions, including
deactivating enzymes [
42
,
43
]. K
+
fulfils multiple functions in plants, including turgor maintenance,
stomatal regulation, and intracellular pH regulation [
44
]. Thus, the inhibition of K
+
uptake by Na
+
induces K
+
deficiency, and consequently, the obstruction of K-dependent processes. It is for this reason
that Na
+
exclusion and the resultant maintenance of high cytosolic K
+
/Na
+
ratios is a key salt tolerance
trait [
8
,
11
]. In the present study, while the sensitive cultivars (Zabad, Nashukharma, Abunarenja,
HilaliOmani, Barni, and Khalas) maintained higher Na
+
concentrations in the roots under salt stress,
Forests 2017,8, 136 12 of 14
the tolerant ones (Umsila, Nagal, Fard, and Manoma) maintained lower concentrations. All of the
cultivars, with the exception of Zabad, had elevated K
+
concentrations in the shoots under salt stress.
However, given the higher Na
+
concentrations in the shoots of the sensitive cultivars, their shoot
Na
+
/K
+
ratios were much higher than those of the tolerant ones (Figure 6C). This was especially true
of Zabad, which showed a shoot Na
+
/K
+
ratio of >4, attributable to a decreased K
+
concentration
in the shoots under salt stress. Most significantly, the reduction in K
+
concentrations in Zabad roots
increased the possibility of Na
+
-induced K
+
leakage. K
+
leakage is one of the main traits that indicates
sensitivity to salt stress, and a plant’s ability to prevent it under salt stress constitutes a key tolerance
mechanism [
45
,
46
]. This result shows that Na
+
exclusion in the shoots, with the concomitant enhanced
accumulation of K
+
, is very important in salt stress adaptation in date palms, especially given the
strong negative relationship between Na
+
and growth (r=
−
0.866, p< 0.000). Indeed, this trait was
earlier shown to account for the tolerance of another date palm cultivar, Medjool, to salt stress [21].
5. Conclusions
The adaptation of date palms to salinity involves mechanisms for Na
+
exclusion in the leaf, and
the regulation of oxidative damage and photosynthesis. The screening has revealed two groups:
tolerant and sensitive cultivars. Within the group of tolerant cultivars, Manoma and Umsila had
more tolerance potential, with high Na
+
exclusion from the leaves, low electrolyte leakage, and a high
dry shoot and root weight. These traits accounted for their superior tolerance to conditions of high
salinity. On the other hand, among the sensitive cultivars, Zabad showed more sensitivity with low
Na
+
exclusion from the leaves, a high electrolyte leakage, and a low dry shoot and root weight, and
these parameters potentially contributed to its susceptibility to high salinity.
Supplementary Materials:
The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/8/4/136/s1,
Table S1. Analysis of variance (Two-Way-ANOVA) showing the interaction between cultivars (F1) and treatments
(F2). DWS stands for shoot dry weight, DWR stands for root dry weight, EL% stands for electrolyte leakage, Na
+
S
stands for sodium in the shoot, K
+
S stands for potassium in the shoot, Na
+
/K
+shoot
Ratio stands for shoot sodium
potassium ratio, Na
+
R stands for sodium in the root, K
+
R stands for potassium in the root, Na
+
/K
+root
Ratio
stands for root sodium potassium ratio, C
i
stands for intercellular CO
2
concentration, Estands for transpiration
rate, gs stands for stomatal conductance, Astands for photosynthetic rate, WUE stands for water use efficiency,
Qy stands for quantum yield, LA stands for leaf area, and RWC % stands for relative water content; Table S2.
The Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and p-values measured for different parameters. Na
+
stands for sodium
ions, DWS stands for shoot dry weight, DWR stands for root dry weight, EL stands for electrolyte leakage,
Astands for photosynthetic rate, gs stands for stomatal conductance, RWC % stands for relative water content,
Chl
a+b
stands for chlorophyll a and b, LA stands for leaf area, WUE stands for water use efficiency, and C
i
stands
for intercellular CO2concentration.
Acknowledgments:
This project was supported by the generous grant number 151 from the research council
(TRC), Oman.
Author Contributions:
L.A.K. and D.M.A. conceived, designed, and performed the experiments, analyzed data,
and wrote the manuscript, R.A.Y. designed the experiment and M.W.Y. designed the experiment, wrote the
manuscript, and contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Shabala, S. Learning from halophytes: Physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance
in crops. Ann. Bot. 2013,112, 1209–1221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Munns, R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ.
2002
,25, 239–250. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
3.
Tattini, M.; Melgar, J.; Traversi, M. Responses of olea europaea to high salinity: A brief-ecophysiological-
review. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2008,22, 159–173.
4.
García-Sánchez, F.; Jifon, J.L.; Carvajal, M.; Syvertsen, J.P. Gas exchange, chlorophyll and nutrient contents
in relation to NA
+
and Cl
−
accumulation in ‘sunburst’ mandarin grafted on different rootstocks. Plant Sci.
2002,162, 705–712. [CrossRef]
Forests 2017,8, 136 13 of 14
5.
Santos, C.V. Regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation by salt stress in sunflower leaves.
Sci. Hort. 2004,103, 93–99. [CrossRef]
6.
Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop
plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010,48, 909–930. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.
Anschütz, U.; Becker, D.; Shabala, S. Going beyond nutrition: Regulation of potassium homoeostasis as
a common denominator of plant adaptive responses to environment. J. Plant Physiol.
2014
,171, 670–687.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.
Plett, D.C.; Møller, I. Na
+
transport in glycophytic plants: What we know and would like to know.
Plant Cell Environ. 2010,33, 612–626. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.
Wang, M.; Zheng, Q.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci.
2013,14, 7370–7390. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.
Assaha, D.V.; Mekawy, A.M.M.; Ueda, A.; Saneoka, H. Salinity-induced expression of hkt may be
crucial for Na
+
exclusion in the leaf blade of huckleberry (solanum scabrum mill.), but not of eggplant
(Solanum melongena L.). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015,460, 416–421. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008,59, 651–681. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
12.
Cotsaftis, O.; Plett, D.; Shirley, N.; Tester, M.; Hrmova, M. A two-staged model of Na
+
exclusion in rice
explained by 3d modeling of hkt transporters and alternative splicing. PLoS ONE
2012
,7, e39865. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
13.
Fujimaki, S.; Maruyama, T.; Suzui, N.; Kawachi, N.; Miwa, E.; Higuchi, K. Base to tip and long-distance
transport of sodium in the root of common reed (phragmites australis (cav.) trin. Ex steud.) at steady state
under constant high-salt conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015,56, 943–950. [PubMed]
14.
Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: Achievements and
limitations. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005,16, 123–132. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.
Mekawy, A.M.M.; Assaha, D.V.; Yahagi, H.; Tada, Y.; Ueda, A.; Saneoka, H. Growth, physiological adaptation,
and gene expression analysis of two egyptian rice cultivars under salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem.
2015
,87,
17–25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.
Munns, R.; James, R.A.; Xu, B.; Athman, A.; Conn, S.J.; Jordans, C.; Byrt, C.S.; Hare, R.A.; Tyerman, S.D.;
Tester, M. Wheat grain yield on saline soils is improved by an ancestral Na
+
transporter gene. Nat. Biotechnol.
2012,30, 360–364. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.
Al-Kateeb, S.; Al-Kateeb, A.; Ali-Dinar, H. Photosynthesis Efficiency of Date Palm Varieties Grown in Saudi
Arabia; The Final Technical Report of the Research Project Submitted by the Date Palm Research Centre to
the Deanship of Scientific Research; King Faisal University: Hofuf, Saudi Arabia, 2002.
18.
Alhammadi, M.S.; Kurup, S.S. Impact of Salinity Stress on Date Palm (Phoenix Dactylifera L.)—A Review;
INTECH Open Access Publisher: Vienna, Austria, 2012.
19.
Aljuburi, H.J.; Maroff, A. The growth and mineral composition of hatamy date palm seedlings as affected by
sea water and growth regulators. In Proceedings of the III International Date Palm Conference, Abu Dhabi,
UAE, 19–21 February 2006; pp. 161–164.
20.
Alrasbi, S.A.R.; Hussain, N.; Schmeisky, H. Evaluation of the growth of date palm seedlings irrigated
with saline water in the sultanate of Oman. In Proceedings of the IV International Date Palm Conference,
Abu Dhabi, UAE, 15–17 March 2010; pp. 233–246.
21.
Sperling, O.; Lazarovitch, N.; Schwartz, A.; Shapira, O. Effects of high salinity irrigation on growth,
gas-exchange, and photoprotection in date palms (Phoenix dactylifera L., cv. Medjool). Environ. Exp. Bot.
2014
,
99, 100–109. [CrossRef]
22.
Yaish, M.W.; Kumar, P.P. Salt tolerance research in date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.), past, present, and
future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci. 2015,6, 348. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23.
Youssef, T.; Awad, M.A. Mechanisms of enhancing photosynthetic gas exchange in date palm seedlings
(Phoenix dactylifera L.) under salinity stress by a 5-aminolevulinic acid-based fertilizer. J. Plant Growth Regul.
2008,27, 1–9. [CrossRef]
24.
Al-Yahyai, R.; Al-Kharusi, L. Physical and chemical quality attributes of freeze-stored dates. Int. J. Agric. Biol.
2012,14, 97–100.
25.
Aljuburi, H.V. Effect of sodium chloride on seedling growth of four date palm varieties. Ann. Arid Zone
1993
,
31, 259–262.
Forests 2017,8, 136 14 of 14
26.
Yaish, M. Proline accumulation is a general response to abiotic stress in the date palm tree
(Phoenix dactylifera L.). Genet. Mol. Res. 2015,14, 9943–9950. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27.
Assaha, D.V.; Ueda, A.; Saneoka, H. Comparison of growth and mineral accumulation of two solanaceous
species, Solanum scabrum mill.(huckleberry) and S. Melongena l.(eggplant), under salinity stress. Soil Sci.
Plant Nutr. 2013,59, 912–920.
28.
Porra, R.; Thompson, W.; Kriedemann, P. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous
equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: Verification of the
concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg.
1989,975, 384–394. [CrossRef]
29.
Barr, H.; Weatherley, P. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in
leaves. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1962,15, 28. [CrossRef]
30.
Reddy, A.R.; Chaitanya, K.V.; Vivekanandan, M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and
antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2004,161, 1189–1202. [CrossRef]
31.
Assaha, D.V.M.; Liu, L.; Ueda, A.; Nagaoka, T.; Saneoka, H. Effects of drought stress on growth, solute
accumulation and membrane stability of leafy vegetable, huckleberry (Solanum scabrum mill.). J. Environ. Biol.
2016,37, 107. [PubMed]
32.
Meziane, D.; Shipley, B. Direct and indirect relationships between specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen and leaf
gas exchange. Effects of irradiance and nutrient supply. Ann. Bot. 2001,88, 915–927. [CrossRef]
33. Blankenship, R.E. Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis; John Wiley & Sons: Abingdon, Oxon, UK, 2013.
34.
Zhu, J.-K. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
2003
,6, 441–445. [CrossRef]
35.
Yeo, A.; Yeo, M.; Flowers, S.; Flowers, T. Screening of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for physiological
characters contributing to salinity resistance, and their relationship to overall performance. TAG Theor.
Appl. Genet. 1990,79, 377–384. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36.
Colmer, T.; Munns, R.; Flowers, T. Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: Future prospects. Anim.
Prod. Sci. 2006,45, 1425–1443. [CrossRef]
37.
Maxwell, K.; Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence—A practical guide. J. Exp. Bot.
2000
,51, 659–668.
[PubMed]
38.
Flexas, J.; Bota, J.; Loreto, F.; Cornic, G.; Sharkey, T. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis
under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol. 2004,6, 269–279. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39.
Flexas, J.; DIAZ-ESPEJO, A.; GalmES, J.; Kaldenhoff, R.; Medrano, H.; RIBAS-CARBO, M. Rapid variations
of mesophyll conductance in response to changes in Co
2
concentration around leaves. Plant Cell Environ.
2007,30, 1284–1298. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40.
Ghoulam, C.; Foursy, A.; Fares, K. Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation
in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environ. Exper. Bot.
2002
,47, 39–50. [CrossRef]
41.
Flowers, T.J.; Munns, R.; Colmer, T.D. Sodium chloride toxicity and the cellular basis of salt tolerance in
halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015,115, 419–431. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42.
Cramer, G.R.; Lynch, J.; Läuchli, A.; Epstein, E. Influx of Na
+
, K
+
, and Ca
2+
into roots of salt-stressed cotton
seedlings effects of supplemental Ca2+.Plant Physiol. 1987,83, 510–516. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43.
Maathuis, F.J.; Amtmann, A. K
+
nutrition and Na
+
toxicity: The basis of cellular K
+
/Na
+
ratios. Ann. Bot.
1999,84, 123–133. [CrossRef]
44.
Shabala, S. Regulation of potassium transport in leaves: From molecular to tissue level. Ann. Bot.
2003
,92,
627–634. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45.
Demidchik, V.; Cuin, T.A.; Svistunenko, D.; Smith, S.J.; Miller, A.J.; Shabala, S.; Sokolik, A.; Yurin, V.
Arabidopsis root K
+
-efflux conductance activated by hydroxyl radicals: Single-channel properties, genetic
basis and involvement in stress-induced cell death. J. Cell Sci. 2010,123, 1468–1479. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46.
Yaish, M.W.; Patankar, H.V.; Assaha, D.V.; Zheng, Y.; Al-Yahyai, R.; Sunkar, R. Genome-wide expression
profiling in leaves and roots of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) exposed to salinity. BMC Genom.
2017
,18,
246. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).