Authors examined the relationship between individual differences in L1 print exposure and differences in early L1 skills and
later L2 aptitude, L2 proficiency, and L2 classroom achievement. Participants were administered measures of L1 word decoding,
spelling, phonemic awareness, reading comprehension, receptive vocabulary, and listening comprehension in 1–5th grades, and
then followed into
... [Show full abstract] 9–10th grades where measures of L2 aptitude, L2 proficiency, and L1 print exposure were administered. Students’
responses on the L1 print exposure measure were used to divide them into High, Average, and Low Print groups. Findings showed
significant differences between the High versus Low Print groups on all L1 skill measures, L2 aptitude and L2 proficiency
tests, and L2 classroom achievement after controlling for IQ. L1 skill differences between the groups emerged as early as
1st grade. L1 phonemic awareness, L1 word decoding, and L1 spelling measures were the best discriminators of L1 print exposure
among the three groups. Results suggest that early success in L1 reading and reading volume prior to L2 study may be related
to differences in L2 aptitude, L2 proficiency, and L2 achievement several years later.