A laser diffractometer and three image based instruments with spatial resolutions between 0.33 and 10 µm/pixel were compared through measurements on calibration spheres and fine fractions comprising pulp fines of various types, neat PCC filler, and a mixture of fines and fillers.
The laser diffractometer was highly sensitive to the keyed
in refractive index of the samples, which was calculated
... [Show full abstract]
based on volume-based mixing rules. A high-resolution
flow cytometer and a high-resolution fibre analyser were
found to be complimentary for measurements on neat fines
and fines/filler mixtures, and superior to the laser
diffractometer. When measuring on fillers, the laser
diffractometer performed as well as the high-resolution
flow cytometer, which was capable of resolving single
filler particles.
The sizes of the calibration spheres were overestimated
by the image-based instruments, and the measurement
uncertainty was high. The uncertainty was mainly
attributed to the unrestricted particle motion, and the low
accuracy to the dissimilar optical properties of the
calibration material, compared to fines. Thus, calibration
materials with shape and optical properties more similar to
fines should be developed.