Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 ( 2017 ) 765 – 772
1878-0296 © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of SBE16.
doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.160
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
International Conference on Sustainable Synergies from Buildings to the Urban Scale, SBE16
Increasing Construction Quality of External Thermal Insulation
Composite System (ETICS) by Revealing on-site Degradation
Factors
Virgo Sulakatkoa,b,*, Eneli Liismaa, Erki Soekova
aTallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate Street 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
bTechnische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juli 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Abstract
The installation of External Thermal Insulation Composite System (ETICS) enables to protect building envelope from natural
weather effects and increase energy efficiency. As the system can be installed externally with simple work methods the usage is
growing in European countries. The quality of the outcome is influenced by design, material selection, and on-site construction
process. The on-site fixing process of ETICS is guided by numerous regulations and guidelines which have an insignificant
impact on the actual construction technology. A list of Degradation Factors (DF) is created to classify the relevant on-site
activities.
Categorised on-site Degradation Factors are basing on various studies, standards, and regulations set for products. The
shortcomings are categorised in eight sets: substrate, mixtures, adhesive, insulation, anchors, reinforcement, finishing layer and
auxiliary materials. Additionally, a field study has been conducted to test the occurrence of on-site shortcomings in Estonia. The
collected measurements and observations did not reveal severe and systematic installation failures, but random deviations
occurred in most layers which might lead to the degradation of ETICS.
The paper categorises on-site shortcomings which can lead to the loss of technical performance during the service life of the
façade.
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of SBE16.
Keywords: Degradation of facades; thin-layer rendering system; External Thermal Insulation Composite System; ETICS; construction process
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +372-620-2465; fax: +372-620-2453.
E-mail address: virgo.sulakatko@ttu.ee
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of SBE16.
766 Virgo Sulakatko et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 ( 2017 ) 765 – 772
1. Introduction
Energy efficiency of the existing buildings can be increased by improving the external envelope of the building.
One of the often used solutions in Europe is to install External Thermal Insulation Composite System (ETICS). The
system can be applied externally with simple work methods. Each layer of the system is designated to provide
particular value and has a significant role in the long-term durability. The outcome of the façade is influenced by
numerous factors which alter the quality of the building1. Arising defects and reduced thermal properties of the
building are related to on-site activities for 66% of the cases2. To evaluate the economic and technical impact of
construction technology, on-site activities which modify essential characteristics need to be identified. The
application process directly influences the calculated energy consumption, performance requirements and the
technical properties of building materials. The conducted analysis identifies and categorises relevant activities which
can alter the performance of the façade system.
2. The Field Study to test technology shortcomings on construction sites
Based on quality control requirements established by product manufacturers’ guidelines a field study has been
conducted to reveal additional on-site construction process shortcomings in Estonia. Seven buildings were selected,
and observations repeated four times on each construction site during the autumn season which is the most
problematic for facades. Although the layers of ETICS are installed and covered swiftly, the field study enabled to
investigate the activities of craftsmen during the application of different layers.
The collected measurements and observations revealed no severe and systematic installation failures, but random
deviations occurred in most layers. It can be pointed out that the characteristics of work methods are craftsmen
specific and repeated by the person during the ongoing application. The most common shortcomings were:
x application during unsuitable climate conditions,
x increased gap width between insulation plates,
x reduced overlap of reinforcement mesh, and
x crossed joints of the insulation plates.
In autumn season of Nordic climate, the temperature might fall unexpectedly below zero degrees during night
time, and the amount of rainfall is high. The applied thin layers have an increased risk of freezing, and the
environment should be controlled to reduce the risk of unsuitable climate conditions. During the observations, it is
noted that three facades from seven were covered with tarpaulin, and one of them was also heated. The results lead
to the assumption that the potential risk of short-term freezing is relatively high.
Gaps between insulation plates affect the thermal resistance of the external envelope and cause reduced long-term
resistance in the areas. During the field study, the gap width between insulation panels was measured, and the after
treatment observed. The recommended gap width (2mm) was exceeded by most of the measured areas. 69% of them
were filled with foam or wedge, 31% were left unfilled. Although the slightly wider unfilled gap has no significant
effect on thermal conductivity, the intruding mortar causes different thermal expansion in the area increasing the
risk of crack formation.
Occasional failures have been noted during the application of reinforcement layer. To ensure the ability to bypass
tensions the overlapping of mesh should be at least 100mm, diagonal mesh placed on the corners of the openings,
and the crossed joints for insulation plates avoided. Observations revealed that these requirements are mostly met,
but individual shortcomings for each of the mentioned requirement were noted on the construction site. The layers
of ETICS need to provide sufficient technical performance. If one layer in a given area has a critical shortcoming, a
degradation will occur. To ensure economic and technical efficiency for the owner the occurrence of relevant
Degradation Factors should be minimised.
3. Relevant on-site Degradation Factors
The on-site Degradation Factors (DFs) are classified by the layer of ETICS – substrate, adhesive, insulation,
mechanical anchors, reinforcement and finishing layer. Common factors for mixtures and auxiliary details are
considered separately.
767
Virgo Sulakatko et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 ( 2017 ) 765 – 772
3.1. Substrate
The existing exterior wall of the building should be able to resist the additional loads caused by ETICS and is
responsible in large extent for the stability or adhesive characteristics of the system. The relevant on-site DFs are
summarised in Table 1.
Layers surface conditions influence the adhesive bond between applied and existing materials. To provide
sufficient adhesive properties and bear additional loads the substrate irregularities should be pre-treated. The
minimum bond strength (0.08 N/mm2) needs to be fulfilled to tolerate wind suction load, natural weight,
hygrothermal loads, and internal movements of the structure3. The penetration rate of viscous fluids depends on
various preparation works which aim to increase the access to pores4. Substrates with biological growth, dirt, oil or
similar create an adhesion prohibiting layer while old paint can create a chemical reaction between the layers,
causing loss of stability of insulation plates. Beside the adhesion properties, unfavourable climate conditions during
construction process influence the physical properties of the substrate5. Humid substrates affect the cracking
sensitivity, increase flexural strength (flexural strength) and bending modulus (flexural modulus) of the mortar6.
Table 1. Degradation factors for the substrate preparation.
ID
Degradation Factor
S1
Substrate is covered with grease/oil
S2
Substrate is covered with dust/dirt
S3
Substrate is covered with biological growth
S4
Substrate is covered with paint or other material which can chemically react with adhesive
S5
Substrate is under required load bearing capacity
S6
Substrate has defects, detached areas or is uneven
S7
Smooth substrate surface or the adhesive is not suitable
S8
Substrate has low humidity
S9
Substrate is wet; internal moisture level is high
3.2. Common factors for mixtures
The properties of the mixtures depend on the ingredients, storage conditions and application process. The
potential DFs for the mixtures are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Common Degradation Factors for mixtures.
ID
Degradation Factor
M1
Wrong material storage conditions
M2
The mixing procedures do not remove clots
M3
High share of kneading water
M4
Low share of kneading water
M5
High purity of kneading water
M6
Increased aggregate (i.e. sand) share
M7
Increased binder (i.e. cement) content
M8
Not recommended ingredients added to adhesive mixture
M9
Low temperature (freezing) during application and/or curing process
M10
Hot curing conditions
M11
Dry curing conditions
M12
Usage of winter mixtures if weather conditions are not suitable
768 Virgo Sulakatko et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 ( 2017 ) 765 – 772
Only laboratory tested specific ingredients are allowed to be added if the product manufacturer foresees it. The
prefabricated mixtures are not authorised to be altered on site and preparation works need to hold the right dosage of
kneading water and sufficient mixing process7–9.
During the application process, it is important to follow the climatic conditions foreseen by the producer of the
material. High temperatures lead to fast dehydration and cracking due to tensions caused by rapid shrinkage. Low
temperatures cause frost damage, which can be seen if snowflake shaped minor cracks occur shortly after
application. They result to detachment of layer.
3.3. Adhesive
Correctly applied adhesive layer reduces stability concerns of the whole sysem10. To limit the DFs, only
insulations based on polystyrene and mineral wool are examined in this study. For the application of the adhesive
mainly bead-point method is used for polystyrene based insulation and the full area is covered with mineral wool
based insulation materials.
The bead-point method foresees that the insulation plate’s border zones and the middle section are covered with
adhesive. The size of adhesive should be between 40% to 100% depending on the type of fixture (bonded and/or
fixed) and insulation material. The possible DFs are summarized in Table 3.
If it is required to cover the full area (bonded ETICS) or the substrate layer is very smooth, treatment with notch
towel should be conducted to be able to level the substrate unevenness3. It ensures the needed bond strength and
prevents the bowing out of the insulation plate if the application is carried out with enough pressure. Without the
pressure, the adhesion strength between adhesive and substrate will be too weak due to hollow areas.
The middle adhesive dots (bead-point method) prevent the arching out, which can cause a crack formation near
the edges, slightly inner the side. Summer season increases linear thermal expansions and affects the aspect of
stability. The adhesive on the borders prevents the bending out of the sides, which causes crack formation directly
on the edge of the plate. During the winter season, peeling stresses in adhesive layer are higher than in summer, and
thermal effects increase tensions near the edges. Additionally, correct adhesive installation prevents airflow behind
insulation, improving safety in case of fire11.
If an insufficient amount of adhesive is applied during the construction process, the stability of the system is
reduced while increased adhesive area can decrease the soundproof properties up to 3dB3.
Table 3. Degradation factors of the adhesive layer.
ID
Degradation Factor
D1
Missing insulation on the edges (polystyrene)
D2
Missing insulation in the centre (polystyrene)
D3
Insufficient adhesive
D4
Adhesive not rubbed into insulation plate (mineral wool)
D5
Adhesive is not treated with notch towel
D6
Increased area covered with adhesive
D7
Working time of the adhesive is exceeded
D8
Lack of pressure during application of insulation plates
D9
Large unevenness of the adhesive layer
3.4. Insulation
The characteristics of the insulation material influence mainly the thermal conductivity of the façade.
Shortcomings in the construction technology shown in Table 4 can additionally alter to a significant extent the
stability of the system and corrosion protection characteristics. The properties can be modified with UV-Radiation,
short drying-out period, usage of wet material or by shortcomings during application activities.
After the first months of production of the product, moisture diffusion initiates the shrinking process. To avoid
769
Virgo Sulakatko et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 ( 2017 ) 765 – 772
cracking the insulation plates must have finished the diffusion process3. If the materials get wet during storage or
application, the moisture will be trapped in the system for a longer period, and internal moisture decreases expected
corrosion protection12. The drying-out period is depending on vapour diffusion resistance of the system and is
causing the reduction of pull-off strength after the first four months of application and reduce adhesion properties13.
Laboratory tests show that the drying-out period might last up to 12 years14. Usually, the duration of drying out
period of mineral wool in ETICS is up to six months and up to two years polystyrene based insulation. Internal
moisture level determines the activation of corrosion protection. Besides wetting, exposure to UV radiation alters
the material structure on the exposed side reducing adhesion.
Table 4. Degradation factors for insulation material application.
ID
Degradation Factor
I1
Material is exposed to UV-radiation for a longer period
I2
Insulation plates are installed shortly after manufacturing
I3
Wet insulation plates
I4
Continuous gaps between substrate and insulation material (opened to air entry)
I5
Insulation plate vertical joints are crossed or too close
I6
Corners of the openings have crossed joints
I7
Insulation plates joint width is too wide or not aligned
I8
Height difference between insulation plates
I9
Broken areas of the insulation plates are not filled
I10
Missing or too narrow fire reluctant areas
During the installation process, the crossed joints between insulation plates should be avoided as they cause gaps
between insulation plates and increase the risk of height difference. The height difference creates thinner layers in
reinforcement layer and the risk of cracking increases. Gaps between insulation plate joints should be avoided by
installing the plates tightly next to each other. If gaps are present, the mixture fills the areas to some extent, causing
thicker layer in the particular region, resulting cracks due to the shrinking of materials3.
3.5. Mechanically fixed anchors
The performance requirements set for mechanical anchors can be altered by using an unsuitable anchor or by the
poor application. The DFs are presented in Table 5. Mainly plastic anchors which have a screw or a nail as
expansion element are used. To bear wind suction load calculated amount of anchors, with specified length and load
bearing class need to be used. As a secondary effect, it is also noted that the increased number of mechanical
anchors decrease the soundproofing of the system in some extent3.
Table 5. Degradation factors for insulation material application.
ID
Degradation Factor
A1
Increased diameter of drilled anchor hole
A2
Decreased diameter of anchor plate
A3
Decreased amount of anchors
A4
Increased amount of anchors
A5
Location is not as foreseen
A6
Anchor plate is installed too deeply into insulation material
A7
Anchor plate is placed too high
A8
Amount of anchors is not increased in the corners
A9
Unsuitable anchor type
A10
Hole of the anchor is not cleaned
770 Virgo Sulakatko et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 ( 2017 ) 765 – 772
During the application process, a decreased depth of an anchor hole can cause height difference of the anchor
plate. In the case when the plate lies on the higher level, decreased render thickness will dry out faster in comparison
to other areas. During repeated wetting and drying the durability will decrease to 10 years as the hygrothermal tests
have shown3. Frictional strength between the cavity wall and the anchor can be influenced by increased diameter of
drilled anchor hole or no dust removal.
3.6. Reinforcement layer
The stresses caused in the system are transmitted to the reinforcement layer and in the applied mesh. The ability
to transmit stresses can be modified during mesh or mortar application with DFs summarised in Table 6.
The stresses can be directed successfully only if the mortar fills the inner areas of the net. During the installation
process, the layer should be applied in wet to wet conditions and the mesh should be pressed into the mixture. The
covering layer should be installed shortly, as the mixture is not cured to prevent separation of layers3. During
construction works, it is needed to spectate whether the mesh is free of folds, not broken not without hollow areas.
Compatible meshes with enough overlapping are necessary. Otherwise the ability to resist to occurring tensile forces
is harmed.
Diagonally placed additional nets should be applied on the corners of openings as notch stresses occur. The
supplementary mesh should be installed together with the main mesh and covered as usually in not cured conditions
(wet to wet). In the circumstance of missed mesh, diagonal cracks occur3.
Table 6. Degradation Factors of the reinforcement layer.
ID
Degradation Factor
R1
Too smooth external layer of the insulation plate
R2
Decreased overlap of the mesh
R3
Folded mesh
R4
Missing diagonal mesh
R5
Mesh not filled with mortar, unsuitable placement in the layer
R6
Thin mortar layer
R7
Layer is not applied in wet to wet conditions
R8
Not compatible mesh is used
3.7. Finishing coat
The external layer is beside aesthetic function responsible for weather protection. Natural conditions comprise of
a combination of effects - the wind, rain, pollutants, relative humidity, temperature and solar radiation15. As failure
occurs, water penetrates into the system and causes moisture-induced problems. Possible construction technology
related DFs are summarised in Table 7.
Table 7. Degradation Factors of the finishing coat.
ID
Degradation Factor
F1
Missing primer
F2
Reinforcement mixture or primary coat is not cured
F3
Thick render layer/ differences in thickness
F4
Thin render layer (thinner than single grain diameter)
The cracks can be considered dangerous if they are 0.2mm wide for polystyrene based insulation and 0.3mm for
mineral wool based insulations3. To prevent crack formation, a primer should be applied if the system producer
requires it. It ensures the necessary adhesive properties between render and reinforcement layer. In the case of
failure the reduced adhesive properties detaching can occur due to capillary water uptake and storage between the
771
Virgo Sulakatko et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 ( 2017 ) 765 – 772
layers.
The application process is important to follow the required climatic conditions and thickness of the layer.
Increased thickness and high temperatures lead to fast dehydration and cracking due to tensions caused by fast
shrinkage.
3.8. Details and specific regions
Specific technical solutions for particular areas of ETICS are developed rapidly by product manufacturers, and an
increased amount of technical installation options are provided by the product manufacturers or by the designers. To
reveal a comparative overview of problematic areas in the further research the construction technology related
problems of auxiliary details and specific regions are summarised in Table 8 in a more holistic perspective.
Table 8. Degradation Factors for specific details.
ID
Degradation Factor
X1
Structural expansion joint is not installed/finished properly
X2
Windowsill is not finished properly (i.e. curved upwards, proper sealants)
X3
Unsolved rainwater drainage (i.e. drainpipe or drip profiles not used)
X4
Fixed frame connection is not finished accurately (i.e. missing sealants)
X5
Roof edge covers are not installed properly (i.e. vertical detail too short)
X6
Shock resistance solution is unsuitable (i.e. no double reinforcement
mesh, corner details with metal or additional protective plate installed)
X7
Unfinished penetrations through the system (i.e. fixed without sealants)
X8
Plinth details are not installed properly (i.e. incorrect fixing, overlapping
of details, protruding from render)
The areas to be evaluated are structural expansion joints, windowsills, rainwater drainage, fixed frames, roof edge
covers, plinth details, penetration through the system and solutions for shock resistance. The summarised DFs
consist of the most problematic areas of the façade which have an impact on the performance. The auxiliary details
should be planned and applied in a way that water could not penetrate into the system, and internal tensions do not
harm the layers. Therefore, during the design and construction works the holistic requirements set for the system
should be met.
4. Conclusions
Each layer of ETICS needs to fulfil specific requirements while the performance of the layer can be altered by
material selection, design, and on-site construction activities. Shortcomings during construction often cause defects
on the facade or reduced thermal efficiency of the building. To reveal most relevant on-site shortcomings the lists of
Degradation Factors is proposed by the applied layers. Each of the DF has an impact on the system performance and
should be conducted with care. Critical shortcomings during construction process can lead to the loss of technical
performance during the service life of the façade and have an economic and social impact to the owners. By
revealing the on-site Degradation Factors, it is possible to evaluate the technical and economic relevance of each
factor. The knowledge enables to improve the quality of on-site construction process.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by institutional research funding of the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research
IUT1−15 “Nearly-zero energy solutions and their implementation on deep renovation of buildings“.
772 Virgo Sulakatko et al. / Procedia Environmental Sciences 38 ( 2017 ) 765 – 772
References
1. Sulakatko V, Lill I, Liisma E. Analysis of On-site Construction Processes for Effective External Thermal Insulation Composite System
(ETICS) Installation. Procedia Econ Financ 2015;21:297–305.
2. Sulakatko V, Lill I, Liisma E. Towards Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings through analyzing reasons for degradation of facades. Procedia Econ
Financ 2014;18:592–600.
3. Cziesielski E, Vogdt FU. Schäden an Wärmedämm-Verbundsystemen. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag: Stuttgart; 2007.
4. Silva A, Dias JL, Gaspar PL, De Brito J. Statistical models applied to service life prediction of rendered façades. Autom Constr 2013;30,151–
160.
5. Flores-Colen I, De Brito J, Branco F. In situ adherence evaluation of coating materials. Exp Tech 2009;51–60.
6. Balayssac JP, Nicot P, Ruot B, Devs O, Détriché CH. Influence of admixtures on the cracking sensitivity of mortar layers applied to a mineral
substrate. Constr Build Mater 2011;25, 2828–2836.
7. Amaro B, Saraiva D, De Brito J, Flores-Colen I. Inspection and diagnosis system of ETICS on walls. Constr Build Mater 2013;47,1257–1267.
8. Silva CM, Flores-Colen I, Gaspar S. Numerical analysis of renders’ adhesion using an interface model. Constr Build Mater 2013;38,292–305.
9. Fernandes V, Silva L, Ferreira VM, Labrincha JA. Evaluation of mixing and application process parameters of single-coat mortars. Cem Concr
Res 2005;35,836–841.
10. Collina A, Lignola GP. The External Thermal Insulation Composite System (ETICS): More than Comfort and Energy Saving. 3o Congr Port
Argamassas Construção 2010.
11. Künzel HM. Außendämmung bei Bestandsbauten Schäden, Ursachen, Instandsetzungen. Schäden beim energieeffizienten Bauen 2010;37–45.
12. Zirkelbach D, Künzel HM, Slanina P. Einfluss von Undichtheiten bei der Sanierung von Plattenbauten mit Wärmedämm-Verbundsystemen.
WTA-Almanach 2008;285–297.
13. Zirkelbach D, Holm A, Künzel HM. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the durability of mineral wool in ETICS. 10DBMC Int
Conf Durab Build Mater Components 2005.
14. Künzel HM. Austrocknung von Wandkonstruktionen mit Wärmedämm-Verbundsystemen. Bauphysik 1998;20,18–23.
15. Arizzi A, Viles H, Cultrone G. Experimental testing of the durability of lime-based mortars used for rendering historic buildings. Constr
Build Mater 2012;28,807–818.