Content uploaded by Thijs Dhollander
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Thijs Dhollander on Apr 23, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
3541
Bias Field Correction and Intensity Normalisation for Quantitative Analysis of
Apparent Fibre Density
David Raffelt , Thijs Dhollander , J-Donald Tournier , Rami Tabbara , Robert E Smith , Eric Pierre , and Alan
Connelly
Florey Institute of Neuroscience, Melbourne, Australia, Centre for the Developing Brain, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical
Engineering, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Apparent Fibre Density (AFD) is a measure derived from un-normalised fibre orientation distributions. To make AFD quantitative
across subjects, images need to be intensity normalised and bias field corrected. Here we present a fast and robust approach to
simultaneous bias field correction and intensity normalisation by exploiting tissue compartment maps derived from multi-tissue
constrained spherical deconvolution. We performed simulations to show that the method can accurately recover a ground truth
bias field, while also demonstrating qualitative results on in vivo data.
Purpose
A new method for bias field correction and intensity normalisation to enable quantitative comparison of apparent fibre density.
Introduction
Apparent Fibre Density (AFD) is a Fibre Orientation Distribution-derived measure developed to enable fibre-specific quantitative
analysis using HARDI data . While most DWI models derive quantitative measures by normalising the DW signal to the b=0 signal
within each voxel, issues arise when all compartments within the voxel (and their T2s) are not modelled appropriately (i.e. CSF, GM,
extra-axonal space, myelin) . In contrast, previous AFD studies have relied on global intensity normalisation (based on the median
CSF or WM b=0s/mm value), following bias field correction (with the field estimated from the b=0s/mm image). This approach is not
ideal since: 1) intensity normalisation using the median CSF or WM b=0s/mm value may be biased when pathology is extensive or
influences the selection of exemplar voxels for intensity normalisation; 2) the similar T2w values for GM and WM make histogram-
based bias field estimation difficult.
Here we propose a fast and robust method for simultaneous intensity normalisation and bias field correction of DWI data by
exploiting information derived from multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution (mtCSD) .
Methods
All brain voxels contain either GM, WM or CSF (or some mixture thereof); ideally, therefore, the tissue compartment maps from
mtCSD should sum to 1. In practice, variations in T2 will mean that the compartment weights do not generally sum to 1. While a unit
sum constraint could be imposed on the output of mtCSD, in practice the method operates without any form of voxel-wise
normalisation to ensure linearity of the estimated volume fractions with respect to the measured DW signal. Consequently, the
output tissue compartment maps are also affected by intensity variations due to the bias field (Fig. 1a-c). Furthermore, because the
response functions used in the mtCSD are estimated from a subset of voxels in each tissue class , the magnitude of the response
functions may not be appropriate for the whole brain, leading to tissue-specific hyper- or hypo-intensities in the summed image
(GM+GM+CSF) (Fig. 1d).
We estimate a bias field and a global scale factor per tissue type by minimising the cost function, :
where the bias field is modelled by polynomial basis functions at voxel with weights . is the value of the
compartment density map for tissue , is the number of tissue compartments, and is used to account for global differences in
magnitude between tissue types due to miscalibrated response function magnitudes.
To minimise , we iterate between performing a least squares solve for a vector containing the global scale factors (given the
current estimate of ), and a least squares solve for (given the current estimate of ), normalising the bias field to average 1 in
all brain mask voxels. Optimisation is stopped at convergence (~5 iterations).
To evaluate the proposed method, we applied 10 different “ground truth” bias fields to a bias-field-free diffusion MRI phantom . The
ground truth fields were obtained from 10 different subjects from the human connectome project (HCP) . We then performed
mtCSD using GM, WM and CSF response functions that were randomly scaled by a factor (range 0.8-1.2) to simulate miscalibration of
the response functions. We performed two experiments: 1) estimation of the bias field (i.e. no intensity normalisation by ) 2)
Estimating the bias field and intensity normalisation. Results were evaluated by computing the error at each voxel as the absolute
difference between the estimated field and the ground truth, expressed as percentage of the ground truth.
We also demonstrate the proposed method on an in vivo dataset, using tissue maps obtained from mtCSD of a single HCP subject,
and visually compare the result to a commonly used approach .
1 1 2 1 1 1
1
1 2
1
2,3 4
2 2
2
5,6
7
s
t
F
F(w,s) = |1 − dx∫Ω
(x)∑
m
t
=
1
s
t
C
t
B(x)
w
T|2
B(x)
x
w
(x)Ct
t
m
s
t
F
s
w
w
s
8
9
s
10
Results
As shown by Fig 2, for all 10 simulations the median error for all voxels in the brain mask was substantially reduced when modelling
the bias field from the summed tissue compartment image. When also estimating tissue normalisation scale factors to account for
the effect of miscalibration in response function magnitudes, the error in the estimated field was further reduced. Fig. 3
demonstrates that in real in vivo data, the proposed method produces a map of summed tissue densities that is more homogeneous
(and hence more biologically realistic) than the N4-based approach .
Discussion and Conclusion
We have demonstrated a fast a robust method for simultaneously correcting the bias field and performing global intensity
normalisation of mtCSD compartment maps. The corrected tissue maps may be subsequently used for direct quantitative analysis
(e.g. fixel-based analysis ) or connectivity studies .
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.
References
1. Raffelt D, Tournier J-D, Rose S, Ridgway GR, Henderson R, Crozier S, et al. Apparent Fibre Density: a novel measure for the analysis
of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 2012;59:3976–3994.
2. Berlot R, Metzler-Baddeley C, Jones DK, O’Sullivan MJ. CSF contamination contributes to apparent microstructural alterations in
mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage 2014;92:27–35.
3. Bouyagoub S, Dowell N, Hurley S, Wood T, Cercignani mara. Overestimation of CSF Fraction in NODDI: Possible Correction
Techniques and the Effect on Neurite Density and Orientation Dispersion Measures. In: Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. Singapore:
2016.
4. Raffelt DA, Tournier J-D, Smith RE, Vaughan DN, Jackson G, Ridgway GR, et al. Investigating white matter fibre density and
morphology using fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage 2016;
5. Jeurissen B, Tournier J-D, Dhollander T, Connelly A, Sijbers J. Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis
of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 2014;103:411–426.
6. Dhollander T, Connelly A. A novel iterative approach to reap the benefits of multi-tissue CSD from just single-shell (+b=0) diffusion
MRI data. Proc ISMRM 2016;24:3010.
7. Dhollander T, Raffelt D, Connelly A. Unsupervised 3-tissue response function estimation from single-shell or multi-shell diffusion
MR data without a co-registered T1 image. Proc ISMRM Workshop on Breaking the Barriers of Diffusion MRI 2016:5.
8. Esteban O, Caruyer E, Daducci A, Bach-Cuadra M, Ledesma-Carbayo MJ, Santos A. Diffantom: Whole-Brain Diffusion MRI Phantoms
Derived from Real Datasets of the Human Connectome Project. Front. Neuroinform 2016;4.
9. Van Essen DC, Ugurbil K, Auerbach E, Barch D, Behrens TEJ, Bucholz R, et al. The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition
perspective. Neuroimage 2012;62:2222–2231.
10. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med
Imaging 2010;29:1310–1320.
11. Smith RE, Tournier J-D, Calamante F, Connelly A. SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms. Neuroimage
2013;67:298–312.
10
4 11
Figures
Figure 1. Example multi-tissue CSD results from HCP data showing a bias field present in the a) GM b) WM c) CSF tissue
compartments. d) The sum of all tissue compartments, demonstrating a reduced intensity of WM compared to GM and CSF. This is a
consequence of the estimated WM response not being representative in magnitude of all WM.
Figure 2. Simulations demonstrating the error between the estimated bias field and the ground truth. Each box plot contains the
error from all voxels within a brain mask. Shown in red is the error before bias field correction (i.e. an identity bias field). The green
box plots demonstrate that the bias field cannot be accurately estimated if the tissue compartments are not normalised to account
for possible mis-calibrations. The error is substantially reduced when estimating the field from the intensity normalised tissue
compartments (blue plots).
Figure 3. Example of the proposed method applied to an in vivo dataset. a) Summed (GM + WM +CSF) tissue compartment map
before bias field correction or tissue normalisation. b) Bias field estimated by the proposed method. c) Summed tissue compartment
map resulting from the proposed method. d) Summed tissue compartment map after correction by a field estimated from the b=0
images only with N4. Differences between c and d can be observed most prominently in the frontal lobe.
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)
3541