Conference PaperPDF Available

The Effects of Green Roofs on Urban Ecosystems

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

A green roof or living roof is a roof of a building that is partially or completely covered with vegetation and a growing medium, planted over a waterproofing membrane. It may also include additional layers such as a root barrier and drainage and irrigation systems. Container gardens on roofs, where plants are maintained in pots, are not generally considered to be true green roofs, although this is debated. Rooftop ponds are another form of green roofs which are used to treat grey water. Green roofs serve several purposes for a building, such as absorbing rainwater, providing insulation, creating a habitat for wildlife, increasing benevolence and decreasing stress of the people around the roof by providing a more aesthetically pleasing landscape, and helping to lower urban air temperatures and mitigate the heat island effect. Green roofs provide shade and remove heat from the air through evapotranspiration, reducing temperatures of the roof surface and the surrounding air. On hot summer days, the surface temperature of a green roof can be cooler than the air temperature, whereas the surface of a conventional rooftop can be up to 90°F (50°C) warmer. Green roofs can be installed on a wide range of buildings, from industrial facilities to private residences. They can be as simple as a 2-inch covering of hardy groundcover or as complex as a fully accessible park complete with trees. Green roofs not only add aesthetic appeal to the unused roof space that is available in most urban areas; they also provide many benefits; Reduced energy use, Reduced air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, Improved human health and comfort, Enhanced storm water management and water quality, Improved quality of life. In this paper, the effects of green roofs on urban ecosystems, this will be explained with examples (EPA,2008).
Content may be subject to copyright.
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
1
The Effects of Green Roofs on Urban Ecosystems
Murat Özyavuz1, Beste Karakaya2, Deniz Gözde ERTİN3
Namık Kemal University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Archtitecture, Department of
Landscape Architrcture, Tekirdağ, Turkey1, mozyavuz@gmail.com
Namık Kemal University, Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Archtitecture, Department of
Landscape Architrcture, Tekirdağ, Turkey2, karakayabeste@gmail.com
Trakya University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of
Architecture, Edirne, Turkey3, denizertin@yahoo.com
Abstract
A green roof or living roof is a roof of a building that is partially or completely covered with
vegetation and a growing medium, planted over a waterproofing membrane. It may also include
additional layers such as a root barrier and drainage and irrigation systems. Container gardens on
roofs, where plants are maintained in pots, are not generally considered to be true green roofs,
although this is debated. Rooftop ponds are another form of green roofs which are used to
treat grey water. Green roofs serve several purposes for a building, such as absorbing rainwater,
providing insulation, creating a habitat for wildlife, increasing benevolence and decreasing stress
of the people around the roof by providing a more aesthetically pleasing landscape, and helping to
lower urban air temperatures and mitigate the heat island effect. Green roofs provide shade and
remove heat from the air through evapotranspiration, reducing temperatures of the roof surface
and the surrounding air. On hot summer days, the surface temperature of a green roof can be
cooler than the air temperature, whereas the surface of a conventional rooftop can be up to 90°F
(50°C) warmer. Green roofs can be installed on a wide range of buildings, from industrial facilities
to private residences. They can be as simple as a 2-inch covering of hardy groundcover or as
complex as a fully accessible park complete with trees. Green roofs not only add aesthetic appeal
to the unused roof space that is available in most urban areas; they also provide many benefits;
Reduced energy use, Reduced air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, Improved human health
and comfort, Enhanced storm water management and water quality, Improved quality of life. In
this paper, the effects of green roofs on urban ecosystems, this will be explained with examples
(EPA,2008).
Keywords: Urban design, Ecology, Landscape, Environment effect
1. INTRODUCTION
Cities create remarkable social environments out of what had been untouched natural
landscapes. It is important to understand what is lost in that process as well. Besides being
attractive, natural landscapes absorb and infiltrate storm water, provide cooling from
excess heat, offer habitats to a diversity of species, and improve air and water quality. The
urban hardscape a term for heavily urbanized areas with little bare soil cuts cities off from
these natural processes and creates problems like water pollution and increased
temperatures through the urban heat island (United States General Services
Administration, 2011). Green roofs sometimes referred to as ‘vegetated roofs’ or ‘eco-
roofs’—consist of a waterproofing membrane, growing medium (soil) and vegetation
(plants) overlying a traditional roof. Green roofs can help mitigate the problems that cities
create by bringing the natural cooling, water-treatment and air filtration properties that
vegetated landscapes provide to the urban environment. Green (vegetated) roofs have
gained global acceptance as a technology that has the potential to help mitigate the
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
2
multifaceted, complex environmental problems of urban centers. While policies that
encourage green roofs exist at the local and regional level, installation costs remain at a
premium and deter investment in this technology (Clark et al., 2008). Green roofs are
roofs that are substantially covered with living plants. Although historical and
archaeological evidence suggests that green roofs have been built for more than three
thousand years, widespread acceptance has always been limited by the structural cost of
supporting heavy soils and by the technical challenges of low-slope waterproofing. Recent
advances in membrane waterproofing technology combined with the development of
lightweight thin-profile green roofs have finally made green roofs practical for most new
construction.
2. HISTORY OF GREEN ROOF GARDENS
In today's modern architecture, applications often we begin to encounter the roof garden is
a spatial formation actually being used since ancient times. Starting point of the first
examples of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon roof garden applications have emerged in
Mesopotamia. Seen after the first application and early civilizations in Anatolia until the
Roman roof garden terrace or garden applications cannot be seen. Roman period have
been found examples of civil architecture and especially the roof garden villa construction
practices. Roof garden designers of the Renaissance period, although influenced by the
past, thought to reflect the fashion of the period in which they have lived in the building.
Principalities related to the Turkish civilizations in Anatolia, the Seljuk and Ottoman
periods roof garden terrace garden or similar applications cannot be seen. 1867 Paris
World Exhibition has been an important development for the roof garden design. In this
exhibition, a producer has demonstrated a model of thought to the roof garden of his home
in Berlin and has attracted great interest. American architect Frank Lloyd Wright, has
worked independently of initiatives in Europe, the structure of the roof has been accepted
as an integral element of landscape and design. Up to the year 1960 in the world rooftop
garden applications cannot be said to be more examples. Up to the year 1960 in the world
rooftop garden applications cannot be said to be more examples. Because gardens and
open spaces on the building until this time been seen as a major problem and is usually
given over to green space arrangement of underground parking. After the 1960s, the
United States and Europe, especially in large urban green spaces in the garden located in
the roof of the building scale, began to turn into a small park scale. Until 1960,
comparable to the Hanging Gardens of Babylon in the world in size and sample size roof
garden, besides the first Kaiser Center roof garden is a promising example in excess of
this scale (Barış, et. al., 2003).
3. GREEN ROOF TYPES
A green roof can be as simple as a 2-inch (5 cm) covering of hardy, alpine-like
groundcover, generally termed an “extensive” system, or as complex as a fully accessible
park complete with trees, called an “intensive” system (EPA,2008).
3.1. Extensive
For the simpler, lighter weight extensive green roof system, plant selections typically
include sedumssucculent, hardy plantsand other vegetation generally suitable for an
alpine environment. The concept is to design a rugged green roof that needs little
maintenance or human intervention once it is established. Plants adapted to extreme
climates often make good choices and may not require permanent irrigation systems.
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
3
Overall, because of their light weight, extensive systems will require the least amount of
added structural support, which improves their cost-effectiveness when retrofitting an
existing structure. Extensive green roofs have been grown on roofs with slopes of 30° or
more, which would equal a ratio of rise to run of 7:12 or greater. (In contrast, a low-sloped
roof with a ratio of rise to run of 2:12 would have a slope of 9.5°.) The slope determines if
the roof will need additional support to hold the growing medium and other parts of the
vegetative layer in place. Steeper roofs may retain less stormwater than an equivalent,
flatter roof (EPA,2008). Commercial and public buildings tend to use extensive roofs
unless the roofs are intended primarily as occupied garden amenity space. Extensive roofs
require little maintenance once they are established, and are generally cost-effective,
particularly in buildings with long life spans. The basic components of an extensive
system are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Extensive Green Roof Construction (Christopher,et. al.,2003)
3.2. Intensive
An intensive green roof is like a conventional garden, or park, with almost no limit on the
type of available plants, including large trees and shrubs. Building owners or managers
often install these roofs to save energy and provide a garden environment for the building
occupants or the general public to enjoy. Compared to extensive green roofs, intensive
green roofs are heavier and require a higher initial investment and more maintenance over
the long term than extensive roofs. They generally require more structural support to
accommodate the weight of the additional growing medium and public use. Intensive
systems also need to employ irrigation systems, which can use rainwater captured from
the roof or another source (EPA,2008). The basic components of an intensive system are
shown in Figure 2.
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
4
Figure 2. Intensive Green Roof Construction (Christopher,et. al.,2003).
Consequently, both the roof characteristics are comparatively shown in Table 1.
Table 1. A comparison of extensive and intensive green roofs (Oberndorfer, et. al., 2007).
Characteristic
Extensive roof
Intensive roof
Purpose
Functional; storm-water
management, thermal insulation,
fireproofing
Functional and aesthetic; increased
living space
Structural
requirements
Typically within standard roof
weight-bearing parameters;
additional 70 to 170 kg per m2
(Dunnett and Kingsbury 2004)
Planning required in design phase or
structural improvements necessary;
additional 290 to 970 kg per m2
Substrate type
Lightweight; high porosity, low
organic matter
Lightweight to heavy; high porosity,
low organic matter
Average
substrate depth
2 to 20 cm
20 or more cm
Plant
communities
Low-growing communities of plants
and mosses selected for stress-
tolerance qualities (e.g., Sedum spp.,
Sempervivum spp.)
No restrictions other than those
imposed by substrate depth, climate,
building height and exposure, and
irrigation facilities
Irrigation
Most require little or no irrigation
Often require irrigation
Maintenance
Little or no maintenance required;
some weeding or mowing as
necessary
Same maintenance requirements as
similar garden at ground level
Cost (above
waterproofing
membrane)
$10 to $30 per ft2
($100 to $300 per m2)
$20 or more per ft2
($200 per m2)
Accessibility
Generally functional rather than
accessible; will need basic
accessibility for maintenance
Typically accessible; bylaw
considerations
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
5
4. BENEFITS OF GREEN ROOF
Green roofs not only add aesthetic appeal to the unused roof space that is available in
most urban areas; they also a host of potential benefits to building owners and the
surrounding community.. According to (Blackhurst, et al., 2010); a green roof covers a
building roof with vegetation and soil, usually above a waterproof membrane, drainage
layer, and insulation. While green roofs have higher initial costs than traditional roofing,
green roofs have a diverse array of potential benefits (Dunnett and Kingsbury 2004), such
as;
Green roofs have the potential to improve the thermal performance of a roofing
system through shading, insulation, evapotranspiration and thermal mass, thus
reducing a building’s energy demand for space conditioning. Reducing building
cooling loads by preventing excess heat from entering buildings;
Mitigating the urban heat island at appropriate scales and density by providing a
medium that uses excess heat to create water vapor;
Reducing storm-water runoff by retaining precipitation;
Sequestering carbon dioxide and pollutants in biomass;
Filters air pollutants and captures airborne particles;
Improving aesthetic values or providing recreational benefits;
Contributes to biodiversity and creates habitats for birds and invertebrates; and
Providing noise reduction in buildings.
Intensive green roofs offer potential for organic food production and provide a social
gathering place.
Aesthetic benefits of adding additional “green” area in an urban environment.
Accessible green roofs (generally only of the intensive variety) can provide
recreational benefits and amenity space without using up valuable property space.
“Why green roofs? Benefits?” is shown with related pictures in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Why green roofs? Benefits? (URL-1, 2015).
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
6
4.1. Stormwater management
Stormwater management has become a pressing issue for many cities. As urban
development continues, more and more of the city is covered by impervious surfaces
(streets, buildings) that do not retain precipitation and thus produce greater and greater
volumes of polluted runoff. The negative consequences of stormwater contaminated with
trash, oil, and other toxins entering natural bodies of water are well established. The
volume of a precipitation event that is captured by the green roof is only partially
dependent on the design of the green roof. Any green roof will, after a certain quantity of
rainfall, become saturated and incapable of retaining more water. To deal with this
eventuality, many systems include a cistern which captures the excess precipitation as it
leaves the roof and stores it for irrigation during prolonged dry periods (EAD, 1990).
4.2. Biodiversity and Habitat
Biodiversity is a measure of the variety of plants and animals in an area. Green roofs
provide new habitat for beneficial plants and animals in urban areas, helping to increase
biodiversity. Increased biodiversity can help ecosystems continue to function even when
they are disturbed by development or in other ways. Green roofs, particularly intensive
ones, can be designed to integrate multiple habitats and microclimates, thus providing
appropriate conditions for a variety of plants and animals to thrive. They can also be
designed to mimic local native habitats, extending the area available for native species to
colonize, or they can simulate early succession patterns of ground-level habitats, which
can allow gains in biodiversity over time (USGSA, 2011).
4.3. Urban heat island
Green roofs reduce the urban heat island _UHI_ by providing a medium for
evapotranspiration and altering the surface albedo. A reduction to the UHI indirectly
reduces building cooling demands (Blackhurst, et al., 2010). There are several ways in
which green roofs act to reduce the Urban Heat Island effect. A dark colored roof will
absorb far more of the sun’s energy than a green roof. That energy will then radiate from
the dark roof as heat. The amount of cooling a green roof provides through
evapotranspiration will depend greatly on the climate and on the design and management
of the green roof. On many green roofs, it will be most practical to install drought resistant
plants to minimize irrigation requirements and ensure healthy plants. Though such green
roofs will provide less evaporative cooling, they will still provide cooling, thanks to
decreased absorption of sunlight and the increased thermal insulation from plants and
growing media (EAD, 1990) . Other water management options include using gray water
for irrigation or storing runoff occurring during heavy precipitation periods for later use.
Aside from the air quality benefits associated with reducing the urban heat island, green
roofs filter particulate matter from the air and absorb greenhouse gases. Though little
research has been done to quantify the air filtration capacity of green roofs, by one
estimate 1 (one) square meter of grass roof can remove approximately .22 lb/year (0.1
kg/year) of airborne particulates (GRHC, 2002).
4.4. Energy
Potential energy savings associated with green roofs have already been discussed above in
terms of controlling the urban heat island effect for air quality benefits. A green roof
keeps an individual building cool in several ways. First, less of the sun’s energy goes to
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
7
heating up the roof of the building. The plants reflect some sunlight and absorb the rest,
but they do not radiate the absorbed energy in the form of heat to the extent that
conventional rooftops do. A conventional rooftop reradiates some of the sun’s energy it
absorbs back into the air, warming the building’s surroundings, and radiates some of the
absorbed energy into the building itself. Both of these heating pathways have been shown
to increase demand for energy for cooling. Another way in which a green roof can provide
energy savings is via increased insulation. A green roof provides an additional barrier
between the building’s interior and the hot (or cold) environment. In this way it acts much
like conventional insulation materials (EAD, 1990).
4.5. Urban agriculture
Over the last few years, rooftop gardens and farms have been recognized as a promising
form of urban agriculture, and a way to take advantage of a significant amount of flat
space that receives steady sunlight throughout the day. Using rooftop space for food
production might help reduce the distance food travels to reach consumers, potentially
reducing carbon emissions associated with food distribution. It could also provide fresh
and local food options to building occupants and the local population. It could even
provide an outlet to educate the local community about food production and seasonal
variety. It could also boost property values through the addition of a new building service,
and help create jobs.
Urban agriculture can appear in a variety of forms, such as container gardens,
hydroponics, aquaponics, vertical farming, multi-tiered farming, technologies, apiculture,
and rooftop gardens. This last form of urban agriculture, rooftop gardens, is one that can
utilize available space over a somewhat limited environment.
4.6. Air quality
The vertical building massing of downtown areas often inhibits ventilation, reducing wind
speed and trapping pockets of heat. Pollutants can remain suspended for long periods of
time. Green roofs absorb carbon dioxide, a major automobile emission, through foliage,
naturally cleansing the air. The air-cleansing capacity of green roofs has direct benefits for
people who suffer from asthma and other respiratory ailments.
4.7. Aesthetics and Quality of Life
Green roofs can provide many of the same quality of life benefits as other urban greenery.
People in taller, neighboring buildings may enjoy looking down at a rooftop garden.
Allowing public access to rooftop gardens provides residents another green space to
enjoy. Finally, some researchers are evaluating the potential for green roofs to provide a
safe habitat for rare or endangered species, removing them from ground-level predators.
4.8. Job Generation and Economic Development
Green roofs, which are considered green infrastructure, can create employment
opportunities in production, installation, and maintenance of the roof. It also can provide
marketing opportunities and investment benefits for developers and buildings owners.
Economic studies of the abilities of green roof technologies to stimulate a new green jobs
market should compare the labor requirements of conventional roofs with those of green
roofs. Green roofs offer potential long-term job opportunities for both skilled and
unskilled workers. They can also offer building developers and owners a more marketable
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
8
building a s compared to those that lack green roofs. Some evidence suggests that higher
rental occupancy, purchase prices and faster sales may result from the presence of a green
roof.
4.9. Roof Longevity
Controlling noise is another reason to choose green roofs. Soil, plants, and the air layer
trapped between the green roof assembly and the building surface provide sound
insulation. The substrate blocks lower frequencies, while the plants block higher
frequencies. This can mean a reduction in indoor sound levels of as much as 40 decibels,
an important difference to those who live near airports, major highways, or other forms of
industrial-related noise pollution. Additionally, wind moving through the stems and leaves
on green roofs can provide masking noise or create a beneficial soundscape (MacDonagh,
2005).
5. CONCLUSION
Green (vegetated) roofs have gained global acceptance as a technology that has the
potential to help mitigate the multifaceted, complex environmental problems of urban
centers. While policies that encourage green roofs exist at the local and regional level,
installation costs remain at a premium and deter investment in this technology (Clark et
al., 2008). Green roof technology is an effective, practical way to increase the energy
performance of buildings and limit stormwater runoff. Adapting green roofs for federal
buildings can provide important benefits, especially to low-rise buildings and facilities in
districts with strict stormwater regulations. Integrating green roofs into stormwater
permitting requirements may be the most realistic way to make them more financially
viable. Green roofs are also effective in reducing the effects of urban heat islands. It can
help mitigate the ecological problems that cities create by bringing the natural cooling and
water-treatment capabilities of undeveloped areas into the urban environment. Landscape
architects, architects, lands and planners can use green roofs to help solve environmental
problems by bringing nature back to cities in key ways.
The lack of information and education about green roofs must be addressed, however, if
they are to be used more widely. This is especially important in areas with combined
sewer systems and in coastal areas where reducing stormwater runoff can be critically
important to public health and to the health of our watersheds (FEMP, 2004).
6. REFERENCES
Barış, E., Yazgan, M.E. ve Erdoğan, E. (2003). Çatı Bahçeleri, Saksılı Süs Bitkileri
Üreticileri Derneği, Yalova.
Blackhurst, M., Hendrickson, C. and Matthews, S. (2010). Cost-Effectiveness of Green
Roofs, Journal of Architectural Engineering. 136-143 p.
Christopher G. Wark and Wendy W. Wark (2003). Green Roof Specifications and
Standards, The Construction Specifier, August 2003 Vol. 56, No.8
Clark, C., Adriaens, P. and Talbot, B.F. (2008). Green Roof Valuation: A Probabilistic
Economic Analysis of Environmental Benefits, Environmental Science & Technology,
42(6): 2155-2161.
GreenAge Symposium, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts, University Faculty of Architecture
15-17 April 2015, Istanbul, Türkiye
9
Dunnett, N., and Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting green roofs and living walls, Timber
Press, Portland, Ore.
EAD, (1990). Green Roofs Cooling Los Angeles, Environmental Affairs Department,
pp. 64, USA.
EPA, (2008). Green Roofs, EPA's Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of
Strategies, pp. 1-39, USA.
FEMP, (2004). Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, by the
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Green Roofs, pp. 28, USA.
GRHC, (2002). “Public Benefits of Green Roofs”. The Cardinal Group Inc., Green Roofs
for Healthy Cities. Toronto, Ontario Canada. Internet address:
http://www.greenroofs.ca/grhcc/.
MacDonagh, L.P. (2005). Benefits of Green Roofs, Implications, 4(8): 1-6.
Oberndorfer, E., et. al, (2007). “Green Roofs as Urban Ecosystems: Ecological Structures,
Functions, and Services” BioScience 57 (10): 823-833. Internet address:
http://bioscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/57/10/823.full.pdf+html
URL-1, 2015. http://tr.onduline.com/tr/ondugreen%C2%AE-sistem#
USGSA, (2011). The Benefits and Challenges of Green Roofs on Public and Commercial
Buildings, United States General Services Administration pp. 137, USA.
... Rooftop gardens are distinct from green roofs, despite the fact that the two names are sometimes used mistakenly and interchangeably (Mowla, 2010). A "green roof," also known as a "living roof" or "eco roof," is a building's roof that is partially or entirely covered with plants and a growing media, planted atop a waterproofing membrane that may contain additional layers such as a root barrier, drainage, and irrigation systems (Rowe, 2011;Ozyavuz et al., 2015). A "rooftop garden" or "container garden," on the other hand, is a method of cultivating plants on the roof in portable containers or earthen pots (Spacey, 2016), Fig. 1 ...
... The cause for this could be due to the differences in design and types of vegetated roofs. Rooftop gardens are much different from green roofs in terms of design, plant community (diversity) and substrate characteristics, and are not generally considered as true green roofs (Ozyavuz et al., 2015). Although roof gardens provide many of the same benefits as green roofs, still green roofs are much effective in storm water management, thermal insulation as well as increasing roof life longevity (Spacey, 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
Urbanization is continually taking place in the cities. Dhaka, Bangladesh's capital and the world's 11th largest megacity, is no exception to this trend. Cities relying on natural ecosystems outside the city boundaries also benefit from internal urban ecosystems as well. Rooftop gardens have the potential to be excellent urban ecosystem stimulators and play a significant role in urban landscape planning and management. An experimental survey was conducted on twenty rooftop gardens from two metropolitan areas (Mohammadpur and Dhanmondi) of Dhaka city. The goal was to examine the four categories of ecosystem services: Provisioning, supporting, regulating and cultural, supplied by ecosystems within the Rooftop Gardens (RTGs) and to evaluate their performances by examining through a Rapid Assessment Checklist (RAC) tool. The RAC was consisted of 47 proxy indicators (33 qualitative and 14 quantitative indicators) directly or indirectly representing various dimensions of ecosystem services. From a maximum of 100, the average score of total ecosystem services was 50 ± 12 which could be considered as an intermediate performance in ecosystem services provision. The highest score 60 ± 14 was obtained from the cultural services and the lowest score 41 ± 13 was from provisioning services. The assessment of RTGES would allow stakeholders to identify the weak and strong points of the existing rooftop gardens for their management and improvement. A proper understanding of RTGES and integrated participation of gardeners and urban planners could contribute to designing ecosystem service based roof gardens for making human settlements ecologically sustainable.
... Source: Asher [9] Review Discover Cities (2025) 2:20 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00054-6 Green roofs Roofs covered with vegetation help manage rainwater, reduce heat, and increase urban biodiversity [12] Rain gardens Deep-rooted native plants and grasses to manage stormwater runoff cultivated in shallow constructed depressions to maximise on rainwater [13,14] Urban forests Planting trees in urban areas improves air quality, provides shade, and reduces heat islands [15] Bio-swales Removal of debris and pollution contained in surface runoff water by specific landscape elements designed for the task [16] Permeable pavements Paving materials that allow water infiltration and recharge groundwater [17] Constructed wetlands Artificial wetlands created as new or restored habitats that provide water purification and wildlife habitat [18] Vertical gardens Gardens that grow vertically using trellising or planting on vertical surfaces, suitable for space-limited urban areas [19] Agroforestry systems Integrating trees and shrubs into agricultural landscapes for enhanced productivity and ecological sustainability [20] Vol.:(0123456789) Discover Cities (2025) 2:20 | https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00054-6 Review from impacts brought by climate change. ...
Article
Full-text available
Urban Agriculture (UA) is increasingly recognized as a pivotal practice for enhancing urban food security and sustainability in cities across southern Africa. This qualitative study is grounded in a case study design focusing on urban agricultural practices in selected southern African cities and the opportunities and constraints for adopting nature-based practices to enhance urban resilience and environmental sustainability. The study draws on Pretoria, South Africa, Maseru, Leso-tho and Harare, Zimbabwe cases analyzing how socioeconomic factors, urban policies, and environmental challenges influence urban agricultural practices. We analyzed policy documents to explore provisions made for nature-based UA solutions in the respective case study areas. Secondary data was further used to identify the nature of UA practices in the respective case study areas. The findings reveal significant variation in adopting nature-based solutions (NBS) across the cities, driven by differences in policy frameworks, environmental awareness, and local urban dynamics. The study identifies off-plot agriculture as a prevalent practice across cities, albeit under varying regulatory environments. It highlights the need for policies that support sustainable land use and promote ecological resilience through NBS like agroforestry, permaculture, and sustainable water management. The paper argues for a multi-scalar policy approach, emphasizing the importance of local government initiatives that align with national and international sustainability goals. Recommendations are made for enhancing policy frameworks to better integrate NBS into the UA, aiming to foster environmental sustainability, food security, and resilience in urban settings. This study contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable urban development and the role of NBS in addressing urban environmental and socioeconomic challenges.
... Based on many interventions carried out in other European cities to counteract the extreme effects of high temperatures, it would be necessary to provide for the flat roofs of buildings to be covered with plants that can absorb carbon dioxide emissions and reduce the temperature of urban centers [16,[64][65][66][67]. The interventions carried out in the cities of Milan, ABBPR, and the multifunctional complex of Corso Buenos Ares [57,68] can be one good example. ...
Article
Full-text available
Climate change poses a severe environmental crisis where many European urban centers face increased risks, among others, of flooding and/or water scarcity due to intense rainfall and prolonged droughts. Urgent adaptation measures are required to enhance resilience in urban, peri-urban, and agricultural areas against extreme weather events. This article describes a method for categorizing urban areas based on climate-related risks as a targeting and prioritization system for allocating climate resilience measures in cities. The method allows for calculating a climate vulnerability index value, considering temperature, precipitation, wind patterns, population density, altitude, and urban area. Focused on the Mediterranean region, particularly Sicily, the index application generates quantifiable vulnerability values for urban settlements, enabling comparison and prioritization. The reproducible and scalable method provides a valuable tool for urban analysis beyond the Mediterranean and can facilitate decision-making processes to initiate future studies and projects.
... A GR is an engineered nature-based system implemented on top of a building. Depending on their design, GRs can serve several purposes, including stormwater retention, providing insulation to the building and reducing the energy demand for cooling or heating, and mitigating the UHI effect, while creating peaceful retreats for people and animals [21]. GRs are generally categorized as either 'intensive' or 'extensive' systems. ...
Article
Full-text available
Green roofs (GRs) and vertical greenery systems (VGSs) can contribute certain pollutants to stormwater runoff, affecting the quality of the receiving waters. The objective of this review paper is to discuss the potential impact of these systems on the quality of urban runoff. In the green building systems section, a series of materials used in greenery systems and their specific application are presented and environmentally relevant substances that could be leached out from these materials are identified as potential pollutants. After the identification of environmentally relevant pollutants that have already been measured in urban runoff and originate from these systems, an assessment of their pathways, fate, and impact in the aquatic environment is performed. Since GRs and VGSs are already considered to be solutions for stormwater quantity and quality management in urban areas, recommendations for mitigating their environmental impact through runoff are needed. It can be concluded that special focus should be placed on measures that target the pollution source, such as optimizing GR and VGS construction practices and materials used, as well as establishing appropriate decentralized stormwater treatment measures. Both of these approaches will help to reduce or even entirely avoid the emission of relevant pollutants into the aquatic environment.
Article
Full-text available
Urbanization is one of the leading causes of urban flooding as rapid development produces more impervious areas in cities. The application of green roofs is regarded as an effective technology to minimize the adverse effects of urban development. The stormwater management capacities of green roofs have been extensively acknowledged, and they can retain rainfall and detain runoff. Nevertheless, Malaysia has experienced few green roof applications, and only limited literature is available concerning such topics. Additionally, the incorporation of waste and recycled material in green roof designs must be considered to ensure such projects benefit the environment as well as the economy. Therefore, the construction of a green roof utilizing recycled waste materials was attempted. An extensive green roof was constructed using beach morning glory and creeping ox-eye plants as vegetation layers, along with coconut waste, i.e., coconut fiber and coconut shell, as the medium for the filter and drainage layer, respectively. According to the results, the use of recycled coconut waste materials in the green roof operations reduced the peak flow by as much as 86%, while the use of commercial materials led to a reduction of 67%. HIGHLIGHTS The novelty of this study are: The utilization of coconut waste as the green roof materials.; The production of burnt-crushed coconut shell as the drainage layer material.; The use of coconut fiber to replace the non-woven geotextile used in the filter layer.; A sustainable and economical green roof using a recycled waste material.; Able to improve peak flow of surface runoff up to 86% reduction.;
Article
Full-text available
Life-cycle assessment was used to evaluate the widespread installation of green roofs in a typical urban mixed-use neighborhood. Market prices of materials, construction, energy conservation, storm-water management, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions were used to evaluate private and social costs and benefits. Results suggest green roofs are currently not cost effective on a private cost basis, but multifamily and commercial building green roofs are competitive when social benefits are included. Multifamily and commercial green roofs are also competitive alternatives for reducing greenhouse gases and storm-water runoff. However, green roofs are not the most competitive energy conservation techniques. GHG impacts are dominated by the material production and use phases. Energy impacts are dominated by the use phase, with urban heat island (UHI) impacts being an order of magnitude higher than direct building impacts. The quantification of private and social costs and benefits should help guide green roof policy. Results should encourage green roof enthusiasts to set appropriate life-cycle assessment boundaries, including construction material impacts and UHI effects.
Article
Full-text available
Green roofs (roofs with a vegetated surface and substrate) provide ecosystem services in urban areas, including improved storm-water management, better regulation of building temperatures, reduced urban heat-island effects, and increased urban wildlife habitat. This article reviews the evidence for these benefits and examines the biotic and abiotic components that contribute to overall ecosystem services. We emphasize the potential for improving green-roof function by understanding the interactions between its ecosystem elements, especially the relationships among growing media, soil biota, and vegetation, and the interactions between community structure and ecosystem functioning. Further research into green-roof technology should assess the efficacy of green roofs compared to other technologies with similar ends, and ultimately focus on estimates of aggregate benefits at landscape scales and on more holistic cost-benefit analyses.
Article
A report on the first green roof infrastructure conference and trade show held in the city of Chicago, Illinois and hosted by Green Roofs for Healthy Cities, is presented. Over 500 architects, landscape architects, roofing contractors, city planners, developers and others attended the conference to learn and share on the subject. Green roofs are installed across America in steadily increasing numbers over the past decade, and research is being conducted in North American universities on the impact of green roofs on the environment, economy and energy resources.
Article
Green (vegetated) roofs have gained global acceptance as a technologythat has the potential to help mitigate the multifaceted, complex environmental problems of urban centers. While policies that encourage green roofs exist atthe local and regional level, installation costs remain at a premium and deter investment in this technology. The objective of this paper is to quantitatively integrate the range of stormwater, energy, and air pollution benefits of green roofs into an economic model that captures the building-specific scale. Currently, green roofs are primarily valued on increased roof longevity, reduced stormwater runoff, and decreased building energy consumption. Proper valuation of these benefits can reduce the present value of a green roof if investors look beyond the upfront capital costs. Net present value (NPV) analysis comparing a conventional roof system to an extensive green roof system demonstrates that at the end of the green roof lifetime the NPV for the green roof is between 20.3 and 25.2% less than the NPV for the conventional roof over 40 years. The additional upfront investment is recovered at the time when a conventional roof would be replaced. Increasing evidence suggests that green roofs may play a significant role in urban air quality improvement For example, uptake of N0x is estimated to range from 1683to1683 to 6383 per metric ton of NOx reduction. These benefits were included in this study, and results translate to an annual benefit of $895-3392 for a 2000 square meter vegetated roof. Improved air quality leads to a mean NPV for the green roof that is 24.5-40.2% less than the mean conventional roof NPV. Through innovative policies, the inclusion of air pollution mitigation and the reduction of municipal stormwater infrastructure costs in economic valuation of environmental benefits of green roofs can reduce the cost gap that currently hinders U.S. investment in green roof technology.
Planting green roofs and living walls
  • N Dunnett
  • N Kingsbury
Dunnett, N., and Kingsbury, N. (2004). Planting green roofs and living walls, Timber Press, Portland, Ore.
Green Roofs -Cooling Los Angeles, Environmental Affairs Department
EAD, (1990). Green Roofs -Cooling Los Angeles, Environmental Affairs Department, pp. 64, USA.
Green Roofs, EPA's Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies
EPA, (2008). Green Roofs, EPA's Reducing Urban Heat Islands: Compendium of Strategies, pp. 1-39, USA.
Public Benefits of Green Roofs". The Cardinal Group Inc., Green Roofs for Healthy Cities
GRHC, (2002). "Public Benefits of Green Roofs". The Cardinal Group Inc., Green Roofs for Healthy Cities. Toronto, Ontario Canada. Internet address: http://www.greenroofs.ca/grhcc/.
Benefits of Green Roofs
  • L P Macdonagh
MacDonagh, L.P. (2005). Benefits of Green Roofs, Implications, 4(8): 1-6.
Çatı Bahçeleri, Saksılı Süs Bitkileri Üreticileri Derneği
  • E Barış
  • M E Yazgan
  • E Ve Erdoğan
Barış, E., Yazgan, M.E. ve Erdoğan, E. (2003). Çatı Bahçeleri, Saksılı Süs Bitkileri Üreticileri Derneği, Yalova.