ArticlePDF Available

Dependency Theory and Africa's Underdevelopment: a Paradigm Shift from Pseudo-Intellectualism: the Nigerian Perspective

Authors:

Abstract

Over the years, African political and development scholars, writers and commentators have blamed the Europeans for the underdevelopment of African. This has necessitated the evocation of Dependency theory in explaining Africa's cum Nigeria's underdevelopment situation, hence Africa's underdevelopment has been linked to two categories of factors: internal and external. The internal factors, Nnadozie said, fan the ember of the external factors and therefore require and deserve more attention hence the connivance of African elites with the Europeans elites to impoverish the continent. Recently, there has been a clarion to a paradigm shift from the Pseudo-Intellectualism of the dependency theorist made manifest in the Walter Rodney's 'How Europe underdeveloped African' to Igwe' and Ghanaian Chronicle's 'How Africa underdeveloped Africa' and finally, Ope-Agbe's 'How Nigeria underdeveloped Nigeria'. This paradigm shift is the thrust of this paper.
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
116
Dependency Theory and Africa’s Underdevelopment: a Paradigm
Shift from Pseudo-Intellectualism: the Nigerian Perspective
Emeh, Ikechukwu Eke Jeffry
Department of public administration, University of Nigeria, Nsukka
eljeff4u@yahoo.com
Abstract
Over the years, African political and development scholars, writers and commentators have blamed the
Europeans for the underdevelopment of African. This has necessitated the evocation of Dependency theory in
explaining Africa’s cum Nigeria’s underdevelopment situation, hence Africa’s underdevelopment has been
linked to two categories of factors: internal and external. The internal factors, Nnadozie said, fan the ember of
the external factors and therefore require and deserve more attention hence the connivance of African elites with
the Europeans elites to impoverish the continent. Recently, there has been a clarion to a paradigm shift from the
Pseudo-Intellectualism of the dependency theorist made manifest in the Walter Rodney’s ‘How Europe
underdeveloped African’ to Igwe’ and Ghanaian Chronicle’s ‘How Africa underdeveloped Africa’ and finally,
Ope-Agbe‘s ‘How Nigeria underdeveloped Nigeria’. This paradigm shift is the thrust of this paper.
Keywords: Development, Underdevelopment, Dependency, Bad Leadership and Governance.
1. Introduction
Dependency theory holds that “the condition of underdevelopment is precisely the result of the incorporation of
the Third World economies into the capitalist world system which is dominated by the West and North America”
(Randall and Theobald 1998, 120), hence in development studies, dependency implies a situation in which a
particular country or region relies on another for support, “survival” and growth.
The third world countries are the economically underdeveloped countries of Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Latin
America, considered as an entity with common characteristics, such as poverty, high birthrates, and economic
dependence on the advanced countries. The term therefore implies that the third world is exploited, and hat its
destiny is a revolutionary one.
Distinctively, the underdevelopment of the third world is marked by a number of common traits; distorted and
highly dependent economies devoted to producing primary products for the developed world and to provide
markets for their finished goods; traditional, rural social structures; high population growth; and widespread
poverty. Despite the widespread poverty of the countryside and the urban shantytowns, the ruling elites of most
third world countries are outrageously wealthy (Woldu, 2000).
The wind of change of the late 50s and 60s had liberated all the third worlds, Africa and Nigeria, thus rendering
whatever differences in the rate of development a peculiarity to the specific country concerned.
In the Nigerian perspective, to answer correctly the question- is it environment; or is it in our nature; that we
failed or refused to develop, is necessary as it has been rendered impossible by the current climate of pseudo-
intellectualism fueled by some kind of pseudo-anti-colonialism; now turned into anti-imperialism, which
forecloses all discussions by insisting that “we are our own”. This posturing had not only dissuaded us to ask this
basic question but had indeed put thick blinkers into our eyes that we cannot see reality, even though we are
living in the thick of our unpalatable reality- underdevelopment (Kyari, 2008).
This paper hinges deep-seatedly on Chinua Achebe’s “the trouble with Nigeria” (1983); George Ayittey’s
‘Africa in chaos’ (1979) and Kyari Tijani’s ‘Metaphors of Underdevelopment; a reflection from Nigeria’ (2008)
as these three (3) legendary masterpieces lay bare the role of African leaders in ensuring and maintaining
underdevelopment in Africa. This obvious fact this paper seeks to reiterate just as Kyari Tijani, only that this
time, I am not only insisting that Nigeria is gruesomely underdeveloped as caused by her leaders; but that
political and development scholars should stop blaming the whites; by implication dependency theory for
Nigeria’s underdevelopment. Instead of apportioning blame, we should fix our problems.
Unfortunately, Nigerian leaders hide behind these pseudo-intellectualisms to exploit Nigerians and have the
whites blamed for our woes since independence in 1960. Since independence in 1960, the level of exploitation of
the Nigerian people and their land and resources had been remorseless and horrendous and it has gone on for too
long and it was leadership in particular that was responsible. The people turn deaf ear because of their false
consciousness engendered by tradition and culture, poverty, ignorance and illiteracy as it was said by Karl Max
that mans’ economic status determines his consciousness- consciousness determined by abject poverty.
2. Conceptual Perspective
In the context of a nation’s development, the conceptualization of development becomes difficult if not
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
117
impossible unless discussed in tandem with the concept of underdevelopment. In fact, many scholars have
argued that the understanding of these concepts is enhanced when it is hinged on a theory. For the purpose of our
topic, such theory that suffices here is dependency theory. Therefore, the concept of development;
underdevelopment and dependency theory are x-rayed, chronologically.
The concept of development has been variously discussed in literature especially in the social sciences such that
its definition has negated a single generally accepted definition. Development in human society is a many-sided
process. At the level of the individual, it implies increased skill and capacity, greater freedom, creativity, self-
discipline, responsibility and material wellbeing (Rodney, 1972). Okoli and Onah (2002) had asserted that
development involves progression, movement and advancement towards something better. Hence it is
improvement on the material and non-material aspects of life involving actions, reactions and motions. They also
observed that development goes beyond economic and social indicators to include the improvement of human
resources and positive changes in their behaviour. For us, development includes increase in citizens’ access to:
food, water and shelter; information and means of communication; healthcare delivery; good motorable road;
good education, and justice. Whenever these are obtainable, there will be increase in the individual’s dignity,
happiness and patriotic values and quality of life.
This is probably why Todaro (1982) defined development as a “multi-dimensional process involving the re-
organization and re-orientation of the entire economic and social system. This involves in addition to
improvement of income and output, radical changes in institutional, social and administrative structures as well
as in popular attitudes, customs and beliefs”. The main contention according to Ujo (1994) is that development
is both a physical process and a state of mind. The transformation of institution is just one aspect. The other
aspect is that the thinking of the people must change. Hence according to Emezi (1979), the actions, reactions
and interactions which qualify for inclusion as elements of development’ are products of rational thinking,
conscious planning, and genuine citizens’ involvement. They are not chance events or chance phenomena, as
observed by Okoli and Onah. They relate first and foremost, to the economic system because they seek to raise
living standards, widen extensively the scope of productive work; create and strengthen the necessary
foundational infrastructure for higher, larger and more beneficial changes in the economy. Secondly, they relate
to the social system because they affect education, health, housing, social ethic and justice and these are matters
of both the body and the mind which jointly facilitate individual growths and development in the society. Thirdly,
they relate to the political system because they seek to create better patterns of legitimacy patterns that create
conditions which enable all or the most significant groups in the population to participate in the political process
of making decisions and allocating scarce resources and values of their communities. According to Onah (2007),
the most fundamental feature of what we may, for want of better term, call the ‘new’ concepts of development, is
their concern with mankind as development is conceived as a state of human wellbeing rather than as the state of
national economy (Eme & Emeh, 2012).
The conceptualization of development in the aspect of the state of national economy is referred to as the
economic development but when it is mixed with another like socio-economic, it definitely should be looking at
the totality of the well being of man hence the social or societal progression of man alongside his economic well-
being completely defined a developed man. This concern was expressed in a statement known as the Cocoyoc
Declaration, which was adopted by participants at a seminar organized by the United Nations Council on Trade
and Development (UNCTAD) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in Cocoyoc, Mexico, in
1974. The declaration states:
Our first concern is to redefine the whole purpose of development. This should
not be to develop things but to develop man. Human beings have basic needs:
food, shelter, clothing, health, education. Any process of growth that does not
lead to their fulfillment-or even worse, disrupt them is a travesty of the idea of
development.
In line with the above declaration, Dudley seers (1969), wrote:
The question to ask about a country’s development is therefore; what has been
happening to poverty? What has been happening to unemployment? What has
been happening to inequality? If all three of these have declined from high levels,
then, beyond doubt, this has been a period of development for the country
concerned. If one or two of these central problems have been growing worse,
especially if all three have, it would be strange to call the result “development”
even if per capita income doubled (Eme & Emeh, 2012).
Dudley Seers’ definition has been so regarded because he is one of the first economists in the developed world to
emphasize this aspect of development. One would assume that he was following Walter Rodney’s assertion that
development is universal because conditions leading to economic expansion were universal; hence everywhere,
man was faced with the onerous task of survival by meeting some fundamental material needs; and better tools
for production. These tools are materials for the exploitation of man’s environment hence the Marxian notion of
development is conceived as:
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
118
the ability of the people to exploit, manipulate and control their physical
environment, as well as themselves and other individuals outside of themselves and
other individuals outside of themselves for the betterment of everybody and that of
humanity.
As Nnadozie (2004) posited, Man is viewed as both the subject and object of development hence development is
taken as the ability and capacity of man to adequately interact with his physical environment and other
individuals to constantly improve himself and humanity. This idea was succinctly captured by Nnoli (1981) when
he wrote:
Development, first and foremost is a phenomenon associated with changes in
mans humanity and creative energies, not in the capacity of the individual and
society to control and manipulate the other individuals ad societies for their
own benefits and that of humanity at large. It is a process of actualizing man’s
inherent capacity to do things, greater freedom, responsibility and material
wellbeing.
The above definition of development is all encompassing. Against the Marxist backdrop, it warned against the
exploitation and manipulation of man by man and at the same time heed to the Cocoyoc declaration of new
concept of development.
Again, according to Nnadozie, development is also conceived by Marxist perspective as a dialectical process in
which the contradictions between a society’s productive forces and relations of production are resolved in a
dynamic manner, this contradictions in a society are regarded as the driving forces of development in that society.
Obviously, underdevelopment is not the absence of development because from the societal point of view, every
people have developed in one way or another and to a greater or lesser extent. However, underdevelopment
makes sense only as a means of comparative analysis of societal development. This is very much tied to the fact
that human social development has been uneven and from a strictly economic view-point, some human groups
have advanced further by producing more and becoming more wealthy (Rodney, 1972).
Underdevelopment is a term often used to refer to economic underdevelopment, symptoms of which include lack
of access to job opportunities, health care, drinkable water, food, education and housing. It takes place when
resources are not used to their full socio-economic potential, with the result that local or regional development is
slower in most cases than it should be. Furthermore, it results from the complex interplay of internal and external
factors that allow less developed countries only a lop-sided development progression, hence underdeveloped
nations are characterized by a wide disparity between their rich and poor populations, and an unhealthy balance
of trade.
Consequently, Rodney upheld that at all times, one of the ideas behind underdevelopment is a comparative one as
it is possible to compare the economic conditions at two different periods for the same country and determine
whether or not it had developed. Again, a second and even more indispensable component of modern
underdevelopment is that it expresses a particular relationship of exploitation: namely, the exploitation of one
country by another. All of the countries named as ‘’underdeveloped’’ in the world are exploited by others; and
the underdevelopment with which the world is now preoccupied is a product of capitalist, imperialist, and
colonialist exploitation.
Since the end of World War II, we have been experiencing a worldwide struggle for the improvement of living
conditions in the so-called developing countries. At the beginning, there was little query as to the causes of
underdevelopment; the newly independent countries as well as United Nations bodies and industrialized countries
tried to promote development by applying measures like the introduction of know-how through the assignment of
experts, the expansion of education, the development of infrastructure, etc., i.e., they followed the example of the
industrialized countries. In the course of time it became obvious that this was more or less a treatment of
symptoms instead of causes, and the gap gradually widened between the developed and less developed countries
of this world. During the early period of these development efforts there was little discussion on the historical
causes and the real nature of underdevelopment (Kuhnen, 1987).
To explain the reason for the underdevelopment of these nations, W.W. Rostow in 1960 developed his
Modernization theory which conceived underdevelopment as an “original state,” something characteristic of a
“traditional society”, something that has internal origin. In response to this theory, Andre Gunder Frank in 1966
propounded his “dependency theory which saw the world's nations as divided into a core of wealthy nations
which dominate the poor nations whose main function in the system is to provide cheap labour and raw materials
to the core. It held also that the benefits of this system of relationship accrue almost entirely to the rich nations,
which become progressively richer and more developed, while the poor nations, which continually have their
surpluses drained away to the core do not advance, rather they are impoverished.
Dependency has been defined as an explanation of the economic development of a state in terms of the external
influences (political, economic, and cultural) on national development policies (Sunkel, 1969). Theotonio Dos
Santos emphasizes the historical dimension of the dependency relationships in his definition when he wrote:
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
119
Dependency is...an historical condition which shapes a certain structure of the world
economy such that it favours some countries to the detriment of others and limits the
development possibilities of the subordinate economics...a situation in which the
economy of a certain group of countries is conditioned by the development and
expansion of another economy, to which their own is subjected (Dos Santos, 1971).
There are three common features to these definitions which most dependency theorists share.
First, dependency characterizes the international system as comprised of two sets of states, variously described
as dominant/dependent, center/periphery or metropolitan/satellite. The dominant states are the advanced
industrial nations in the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The dependent
states are those states of Latin America, Asia, and Africa which have low per capita GNPs and which rely
heavily on the export of a single commodity for foreign exchange earnings, and the importation of variety of
goods from the western developed dominant states.
Second, both definitions have in common the assumption that external forces are of singular importance to the
economic activities within the dependent states. These external forces include multinational corporations,
international commodity markets, foreign assistance, communications, and any other means by which the
advanced industrialized countries can represent their economic interests abroad.
Third, the definitions of dependency all indicate that the relations between dominant and dependent states are
dynamic because the interactions between the two sets of states tend to not only reinforce but also intensify the
unequal patterns.
Simply put, dependency theory attempts to explain the present underdeveloped state of many nations in the
world by examining the patterns of interactions among nations and by arguing that inequality among nations is
an intrinsic part of those interactions.
The concept of dependency as an explanation for economic underdevelopment has been developed most
prominently by Frank (1966, 1979) and Samir Amin (1974). For Frank, the concepts of development and
underdevelopment have meaning only when applied to nations within the capitalist world-economy. Frank
envisions this world-economy as being divided into two major components, metropolis and satellite. These
concepts are basically equivalent to Wallerstein's (1974) concepts of core and periphery. The flow of economic
surplus in the world-economy is from the satellite (or periphery) to the metropolis (or core), and the world-
economy is organized to make this happen.
The underdeveloped nations therefore have become and remain underdeveloped because they are economically
dominated by developed capitalist nations that have continually been extracting wealth from them. Frank (1966)
has called this process the development of underdevelopment. In this view, the development of the rich nations
and the underdevelopment of the poor ones are but two sides of the same coin as underdevelopment of some
nations has made development for other nations possible and the development of other nations made the
underdevelopment of other nations possible. The primary victims of this process are the vast majority of peasants
and urban workers of the underdeveloped world itself.
While the members of the developed nations do benefit from this, since, their standard of living is raised
substantially, the greatest benefits go to capitalists in the metropolitan countries, as well as to the agricultural and
industrial elites of the satellite countries, hence the latter have close economic and political ties to the
metropolitan elite and play a crucial role in retaining, maintaining and sustaining the situation of economic
dependency of their states. They are blind-folded to the stark reality of the lopsidedness in their relationship with
the metropolitan capitalists leading to Samir Amin’s (1974) articulated and disarticulated economies. According
to him, the developed nations have highly articulated economies, or ones whose multiple sectors closely
interrelate such that development in any one sector stimulates development in the other sectors. Underdeveloped
societies, by contrast, have disarticulated economies. These are economies whose various sectors do not closely
interrelate. As a result, development in any one sector is commonly unable to stimulate development in the other
sectors. This is the case of Nigeria whose economy is primarily involved in the production of raw materials for
export to the developed countries.
The concept of dependency can be understood more thoroughly by examining its various forms. Theotonio Dos
Santos (1970) has suggested three historical forms of dependency through which the now-underdeveloped
nations have passed.
The first of these he calls colonial dependency. Under this form of dependency, which began as early as the
sixteenth century in some parts of the world, European capitalist powers colonized pre-capitalist regions and
established a monopoly over land, mines, and labor. Surplus wealth was extracted from these regions by means
of European control over trade relations. The economic character of these colonized regions was powerfully
shaped by their subordination to European nations.
A second is financial-industrial dependency. This form of dependence began in the late nineteenth century. It
was characterized by the expansion of European industrial capital (as opposed to the earlier merchant capital)
into the backward regions of the world. This form of dependency was part and parcel of the monopoly phase of
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
120
capitalist development. Financial-industrial dependency involved heavy investment of big capitalists in the
world’s backward regions mainly for the purpose of producing raw materials to be exported back to the core
nations.
The most recent form of dependency is termed by Dos Santos the new dependency. This kind of dependency is a
post-World War II phenomenon and involves the emergence of transnational corporations that engage in
extensive economic investment in Third World countries.
In addition to this concern about the forms of dependency, there is the question of how economic dependency
creates and sustains underdevelopment. Dependency theorists often disagree with respect to the particular
mechanisms whereby this occurs. Several different mechanisms through which dependency induces
underdevelopment have been proposed by various theorists, and more than one is sometimes proposed even by
the same theorist. Four possible dependency mechanisms are most frequently suggested in the current
dependency literature (Chase-Dunn, 1975; Delacroix and Ragin, 1981; Barrett and Whyte, 1982) Exploitation
through Repatriation; Elite Complicity; Structural Distortion; and Market vulnerability.
In the final analysis, Walter Rodney averred that the question as to who and what is responsible for African
underdevelopment can be answered at two levels. Firstly, the answer is that the operation of the imperialist
system bears major responsibility from African Economic retardation by draining African wealth and by making
it impossible to develop more rapidly the resources of the continent. Secondly, one has to deal with those who
manipulate the system and those who are either agents or unwitting accomplices of the said system. The capitalist
of Western Europe were the ones who actively extended their exploitation from inside Europe to cover the whole
of Africa.
In recent times, they were joined and to some extent replaced by capitalists from the United States; and for many
years now even the workers of those metropolitan countries have benefited from the exploitation and
underdevelopment of Africa. None of these remarks are intended to remove the ultimate responsibility for
development from the shoulder of Africans. Not only are they accomplices inside the imperialist system, but
every Africa has a responsibility to understand the system and work for its overthrow (Rodney, 1972).
3. Theoretical Perspective
To drive home the point that the underdevelopment of Africa, nay Nigeria is caused primarily by the leaders of
these states, a theory becomes fundamental for its analysis. Such theories include the elite theory, the power elite
theory, the state theory and conspiracy theory; all four theories aptly apply.
Man in the state of nature does not need the political contraption called the state. But it is idle to talk of man
remaining in “the state of nature” if only because of man’s very advanced biological complexity as a vertebrate,
which decreed for it higher degree of need and ultimately a higher standard of living. The ensuing struggle
among this very species to enable each to attain “a higher standard of living” inevitably inaugurated a “war of all
against all”, and without intervention, life would certainly be “short; nasty and brutish”, as Hobbes had put.
Despite its entire burden on man, the state is therefore a necessity, if only to help man save himself from himself
(Kyari, 2008). The state according to Cohen creates inequality and has repressive presence and functioning, yet
man has to tolerate it.
It is the state that brought about these leaders in Africa that have vowed to devour the resources of the continent
and render its inhabitants impoverished. It was also the state that led to the incursion of the whites in Africa that
led to the issue of underdevelopment in the first instance but as Cohen had observed, “what compelled man to
prefer self-preservation rather than self-destruction, are what propelled man towards the state, hence man chose
not to remain an animal.
The emergence of the state led to class struggle and inequalities. This struggle actually was of who will control
the state; who will be the leader. This quest however led to the emergence of the elite class; the elite are those
that rule the state directly and indirectly.
Explicatively, elite is a small group of people who control disproportionate amount of wealth or power. They
have tremendous influence and affluence. This is why the elite theory seeks to describe and explain the power
relationships in contemporary society; positing that a small minority, consisting of members of the economic elite
and policy-planning networks, holds the most power and that this power is independent of a state's democratic
elections process. Through positions in corporations or on corporate boards, and influence over the policy-
planning networks through financial support of foundations or positions with think tanks or policy-discussion
groups, members of the "elite" are able to exert significant power over the policy decisions of corporations and
governments.
The Aristocratic version of this theory is the Classic Elite Theory which is based on two ideas: Power lies in
position of authority in key economic and political institutions; The psychological difference that sets Elites
apart is that they have personal resources, for instance intelligence and skills, and a vested interest in the
government; while the rest are incompetent and do not have the capabilities of governing themselves, the elite
are resourceful and will strive to make the government work to their interest.
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
121
This interest led to the power elite theory by Thomas Dye. Thomas Dye in his book ‘Top Down Policymaking’,
argues that U.S. public policy does not result from the "demands of the people," but rather from Elite consensus
found in Washington, D.C. based non-profit foundations, think tanks, special-interest groups, and prominent
lobbyists and law firms.
The power elite theory claims that single elite, not a multiplicity of competing groups, decides the life-and-death
issues for the nation as a whole, leaving relatively minor matters for the middle level and almost nothing for the
common person. It thus paints a dark picture. According to C. Wright Mills, among the best known power-elite
theorists, the governing elite in the United States draws its members from three areas: (1) the highest political
leaders including the president and a handful of key cabinet members and close advisers; (2) major corporate
owners and directors; and (3) high-ranking military officers.
One dares ask -from where does its strength comes?. Basically it comes from control of the highest positions in
the political and business hierarchy. In the first place, the elite occupy what Mills terms the top command posts
of society. These positions give their holders enormous authority over not just governmental, but financial,
educational, social, civic, and cultural institutions as well. A small group is able to take fundamental actions that
touch everyone. Decisions made in the boardrooms of large corporations and banks affect the rates of inflation
and employment. The influence of the chief executive officers of the IBM and DuPont corporations often rivals
that of the secretary of commerce. In addition, the needs of industry greatly determine the priorities and policies
of educational and research organizations, not to mention the chief economic agencies of government. The
power of the elite has also been enhanced by the close collaboration of political, industrial, and military
organizations.
In Africa, the highest political office, the military and the multinational corporations is where the powers of the
elites are derived from. This is why politics in Africa has become a do-or-die affair; the ex-military generals
have refused to leave the corridor or power. Olusegun Obasanjo, Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida, Mohammadu
Buhari to mention but few have vowed not the leave the highest political post of the country. In the states of the
federation, retired soldiers are seen returning to power as Governor. The ruling political party in Nigeria: People’
Democratic Party (PDP) is also another major source of power to the elites.
This has led to severe struggle between the regions or states as to who will produce the president, Vice President,
Senate President, House of Representative Speaker, Chief Judge of the federation, Accountant General of the
federation, Secretary General of the federation and the likes. The fatality of the struggle is evidenced in the
conspiracy that goes in the system; Conspiracy to unseat a seated public and political office holder; conspiracy to
devour the nation’s treasury and the conspiracy to enrich themselves at the expense of the masses.
This act of self-aggrandizement at the detriment of the people led to the vulgar underdeveloped state of the
African states; Nigeria inclusive, necessitating the conspiracy theory for analysis hence Conspiracy theories exist
in the realm of myth, where imaginations run wild, fears trump facts, and evidence is ignored.
A conspiracy theory explains an event as being the result of an alleged plot by a covert group or organization or,
more broadly, the idea that important political, social or economic events are the products of secret plots that are
largely unknown to the general public. The term is frequently used by scholars and in popular culture to identify
secret military, banking, or political actions aimed at "stealing" power, money, or freedom, from "the people".
Conspiracy theories are based on the notion that complex plots are put into motion by powerful hidden forces
(Barkun, 2003).
The conspiracy in Africa is that the leaders are looting our treasury and casting the blame on the whites who
officially left us some 52-55 years ago on our request. To see the state of African state as decided by the
conspiring elites, the next section suffices.
4. Dependency Theory and African Underdevelopment; A Paradigm Shift
The May 13-19 issue of the Economist, the influential London news magazine has Africa on the cover. The
magazine also has a sketch of Africa on an inside page. It depicts Africa lying prostrate while a bloodied black
hand drills a knife into her very heart: Africa's problems are self- inflicted! It used to be fashionable to blame the
ills of Africa on others: Colonialism; Neo-colonialists; Imperialists; etc. Political Scientists describe this
phenomenon of the blame game as Dependency Theory, a symptom of a symbiotic relationship between the rich
and the poor where the poor is dealt the weak hand, deliberately. Late Walter Rodney wrote a book about that
titled, "How Europe Under-Developed Africa." This is no longer absolutely tenable. The reality of the matter is
that the major culprits of the destruction of Africa today, are Africans themselves. To wit: our corrupt leaders
and their bands of sycophant, president does-no-wrong minions.
Major corruption in African officialdom continues to cause degenerative under-development on the continent.
African countries have become the personal estates of official criminal gangs whose avowed aim is not the
development of their countries, but rather the siphoning off of national resources into foreign banks. Officials in
the tiny European principality of Luxembourg frizzed eight bank accounts totaling 600 million U.S. dollars,
belonging to the late super corrupt Sani Abacha of Nigeria. This is one example of how our African leaders
contribute to the under-development of Africa!
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
122
Official corruption siphoning of money intended for the development of Africa is contemptible. Apart from
making a lot of profit on the interest on investments accruing from Africa's stolen money, Europeans turn around
and loan such money to Africa at exorbitant rates. Thus, in nearly all African countries today, we spend more
money to pay the interest on such loans (not on the debt itself) than we do on Health and Education!
In effect, African countries are played like a football. Whoever has the ball kicks it until it is near deflation! It is
then pumped up by some foreign loans, and the process continues. Such has been our lot since independence.
Africa suffers from chronic intermittent growth, and perpetual deflation (Ghanaian Chronicle, 2000).
Little wonder Nnadozie declared that the economic future of Africa is very bleak; and that of the five continents
in the world, none is facing as many debilitating problems as the African continent. These problems include
those of poverty, hunger, war, environmental/ecological degradation, religious and ethnic conflicts, political
instability, leadership inertia, illiteracy and bad governance, among others (Nnadozie, 2010)”.
Taking poverty as a basic measure of underdevelopment, poverty would appear to be an indelible part of African
peoples and states and has over the past decades continued an unrelenting ravage of the continent. Indeed,
poverty has become one easy and most empirical evidence of underdevelopment and backwardness of Africa.
Although poverty is today accepted as a major global problem as more than one-fifth of humanity is languishing
in abject penury, Africa, especially its sub-Saharan region would appear to be worst hit. Despite its enormous
human and material resources, poverty has not only widened but has also depended and become ramified,
engulfing overwhelming majority of African people and states. And in spite of huge investment of resources ad
several policies and programmes expended on tackling poverty- cum underdevelopment in the continent, it has
persisted and appears to defy every solution.
The critical question therefore is why has poverty cum underdevelopment become perennial in Africa despite all
efforts at curbing the menace? Why is it that in spite of the huge human and material resources which Africa is
endowed with, poverty cum underdevelopment has remained endemic leading to the current preposterous
situation where Africa is dependent on foreign aid and humanitarian assistances to feed her teeming population?
Is it the failure of governance, leadership or political inertia, or the inability to properly diagnose the problem
and the consequent application of wrong and ineffectual policies and programmes towards tackling it? Has
poverty cum underdevelopment become an incurable problem and a permanent feature of the continent a curse
perhaps which Africans must live with and at best only manage?
The big question therefore, is what led to this appalling and ridiculous situation. A combination of factors has
been identified as sustaining poverty and underdevelopment Africa (Nnadozie, 2010). In order to explicate these
factors, they have been categorized into two major areas, namely internal and external factors. The internal
factors include leadership inertia, bad governance, corruption, debt burden, political instability as well as ethnic
and religious strife and civil war. Other issues within the internal factors include hostile physical environment
and environmental degradation, high unemployment growth rate and disinvestment policies and unorthodox and
hostile socio-economic practices and norms among many others. The external factors include foreign debt,
external aid, dumping of toxic wastes on African soil and functionality of poverty itself (Nnadozie, 2010).
As a matter of fact, Sub-Saharan Africa’s economies have deteriorated alarmingly since decolonization. Its
proportion of the world’s export products declined from more than 3 percent in 1950 to only 1 percent in 1990,
and its external debt rose from just over 30 percent of GNP in 1980 to nearly 80 percent in 1994. The World
Bank reported that, of the $231 billion in foreign investment that went into the Third World in 1995, only 1
percent went to Africa. In 1991 there was only one telephone line for every 100 people in comparison to 2.3
lines for the Third World as a whole compared to 37.2 for the industrial countries. By the early to mid-1990s real
income had declined by almost 15 percent from its level in 1965. Food production has declined markedly, to the
point where many African countries cannot feed themselves. Taxes are high, inflation is rampant, and currencies
are unstable. Technological infrastructure has decayed everywhere: roads have become paths and ruts, bridges
are collapsing and do not get repaired, railways are in a state of decay, phones do not work, and universities have
deteriorated. Hospitals are in such a poor state that patients often need to bring their own blankets and bandages
(Ayittey, 1998).
In the last 20 years the continent has experienced severe ethnic hostilities, civil wars, political chaos, and
massive government corruption. Ethnic groups engage in genocidal actions against each other, and governments
often conspire in this. For example, in 1994 ethnic conflict in Burundi and Rwanda between Tutsis and Hutus
resulted in some 700,000 Tutsis being killed, and hundreds of thousands of Hutus were slain as well. This
genocidal civil war led to over a million Hutu refugees fleeing into neighboring Zaire. Many countries seem to
have almost completely disintegrated. As Ayittey haD commented, “For much of 1992 Somalia lay in ruins
effectively destroyed. It had no government, no police force, and no basic essential services. Armed thugs and
bandits roamed the country, pillaging and plundering, and murderous warlords battled savagely for control of
Mogadishu.” Dependency and world-system theories blame exploitation by the core for Africa’s current
problems (Ayittey, 1998).
In the words of Andre Gunder Frank, “the lemon was squeezed dry and then discarded.” But this is a very
dubious conclusion because Ayittey places most of the blame on sub-Saharan Africa’s internal problems, as does
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
123
Castells. Both traced Africa’s massive problems to what they call the “predatory” or “vampire” state
characteristic of so many African societies where dishonesty, thievery, embezzlement, and the likes thrive.
Hence African political leaders can be compared to gangsters and crooks who have acqiiured political powers
merely to advance their own interests. In fact, states as they were usually thought of really do not exist in Africa.
The political institutions that are crucial parts of states – for example, the military, police forces, the civil service,
parliaments, and judiciaries – have suffered a kind of debauchery. Parliaments either do not exist or are little but
charades. Political dictators have staffed each of these institutions with their own tribesmen who will be
completely at their beck and call. There is little or no professionalism and accountability in any of these
institutions. However, Ayittey argues that, although Africa’s problems are mostly of internal origin, the West has
magnified them. Western leaders, he says, have been seduced by despots. They have often supported pro-
capitalist African dictators and supplied them with economic and military aid. He also notes that American
blacks have often praised African leaders and failed to realize the horrendous actions these leaders were engaged
in. If the predatory state is the principal source of Africa’s horrendous economic and social problems, then the
obvious solution would be to destroy this type of state and replace it with a more democratic type. Just like
Afred Sauvy advocated when he wrote:
the third world is nothing, and it wants to be something hence it is exploited
and its destiny is a revolutionary one.
Supportively, Kyari Tijani (2008) averred
“to be frank, Nigeria is now left with only one option-violence-. Within this
one option, we might pray for remission- organized violence; where a good
leader would emerge to direct the violence, and lead it to a positive solution
of our multi-various contradictions”.
But that is much more easily said than done, Ayittey pointed out, hence the commitment to reform has been
weak in African countries. African despots have been extremely reluctant to give up power (just like Nigeria
where, only until 2007, the military were in power both in Kaki or in Agbada) and would rather destroy their
economies instead.
If anyone agues that the African state is not the real source of the African problem, but simply another dimension
of the problem, then the real question is why have such anomalies and underdevelopment persisted.
5. Dependency Theory and Nigeria’s Underdevelopment
It should be pointed out here that the arrowhead factors nurturing underdevelopment in Nigeria is poor or bad
governance and leadership inertia. In other words, it is on these two issues that other factors (both internal and
external) are anchored. What this implies in the words of Nnadozie (2010) is that any attempt to address
underdevelopment in Nigeria must be zeroed in on the problem of leadership inertia and bad governance. That
Nigeria is overwhelmed by poverty and underdevelopment today can easily be attributed to poor, visionless,
inept and selfish leadership’ (Achebe, 1998 and Nnadozie, 2006). From the experiences of other continents,
including America and Asia which passed through similar historical experiences as Africa such as colonialism
and foreign domination, it is evident that their ability to jerk off the yoke of external domination and exploitation
and leap into first and middle class industrialized societies never occurred until their leaders rejected foreign
domination by taking concrete steps through their visionary, resilient, selfless and charismatic leadership.
Indeed, the central factor sustaining underdevelopment in Nigeria is squarely a failure of leadership that is, the
unwillingness or inability of its leaders to rise to the occasion in their responsibility and the challenge of personal
example which are the hallmarks of the true leadership. Nigeria has been less than fortunate in their leadership;
and a fundamental element of this misfortune is the seminal as absence of intellectual rigour in the political
thought of many of the founding fathers of the country; a proclivity “to pious materialistic wooliness and self-
oriented pedestrianism” (Achebe, 1998).
The ways by which the Nigerian leaders have sustained the underdevelopment of the country are as follows: one
is the manner Nigerian leaders have been mismanaging the enormous and God-given resources of the country.
They waste the wealth of the nation by purchasing foreign and exotic goods and services for themselves, friends
and cronies. Secondly, a large junk of that wealth was simply stolen through inflated contracts, frauds and other
dubious methods. Apart from direct stealing of public fund, there is also the adoption of corrupted concept of
development and development projects and programmes by governments in Nigeria, hence investments and
public fund are for pecuniary reasons directed by our leaders at white elephant projects and programmes that do
not yield dividends or create employment for the people as private interests override public interests. Colossal
sums of public money has been lost in is manner.
Nigerian leaders who loot their state treasuries often take the monies to foreign banks mostly in Europe and
America, thereby depriving the country even the benefits of reaping from investing the stolen money in the
country; as a large chunk of state resources should have been channeled into productive sectors of the economy
to strengthen social services, especially in the areas of health, education, infrastructural facilities and energy is
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
124
lost through various forms of corrupt practices. The money all end up in the pockets of few privileged
state/government officials and the people are worst off for it (Nnadozie, 2010).
Eranga (2009) wrote that Nigeria is besieged with huge debt burden and unequal foreign exchanged and that her
economy is in a state of near-collapse. Despite the debt cancellation by the Paris Club, Nigeria still owes huge
debts, as the nation’s total debt stock as at end of 2010 stood at $4.7 billion for external debt and #4.5 trillion for
domestic debt (Babajide, 2011). Inflation is on the increase day in and day out, reaching to its peak when it was
rated at 10.5 percent in October 2011. Unemployment, statistically given at 4.9 percent in 2007 by Index Mundi
(2011) has ravaged the economy to the extent that it has been said that about 64 million Nigerian graduates are
unemployed as evidenced by the teeming millions of Nigeria youths roaming the street in utmost despair;
Majority of them joining crime and other social vices to make ends meet as they must feed, clothe have a shelter
over their head and fend for their immediate families. These factors are clear indicators of severe
underdevelopment in Nigeria when compared to most developing countries of Africa and when consideration is
paid to the amount of loot that goes in the higher and highest echelon of our public and political realms.
Such categorization has led to the assertion that Nigerian economy presently is characterized by galloping
inflation, unequal foreign exchange rate exasperated by devalued currency and persistent dependence on
importation, widespread unemployment, dilapidated infrastructures exemplified in the nature of the Nigeria
roads and death conservative nature of Nigerian hospitals, epileptic power supply that has helped crippled all
aspect of the societal survival possibility, near death state of the educational sector leading to a unavoidable
brain drain. Entrepreneurship has died as corruption in the system has left nothing to desire in hard work and
labour as youths are now concerned with money-making irrespective of how it comes and who gets hurt in the
process. This is why diligence and honesty has been dethroned while dishonesty and greed has been enthroned.
This also explains why merit has died in Nigeria making way for mediocrity (Eme and Emeh, 2012).
6. Methodological Perspective
Since this is not an expeditory effort stretching out to obtain new data and expand the frontiers of knowledge
therewith, if anything, it is explanatory and confirmatory, this paper relied heavily on known data especially
those on the internet, articles, newspapers and textbooks.
For the purpose of this paper, the United States, China, and Nigeria was used for comparisons and also placed
Ghana, a sister African country on the same pedestals. The aforementioned countries belong to the first, second
and third worlds respectively. Ghana, obviously is a member of the third world, but when compared with Nigeria,
it becomes glaring that we cannot continue to hide under the cloak of belonging to the third world to explain
where we are. Mention was also made of other African Counties like Niger.
China has the largest population in the world: 1.3 billion people. The United States is third with 310 million
people while Nigeria is eighth with 152 million citizens. Ghana comes 47th with 24 million people.
Nigeria’s population grew at a rate of 1.97 percent by 2010 estimates. That of the US grew at 0.97percent,
China's rate was 0.49 percent and Ghana's grew at 1.86 percent. It is clear that of the four countries, we have the
largest growth rate. Various organizations including United Nations organs have predicted that Nigeria's
population will reach 300 million in the next three decades. By the way, Niger republic has the highest growth
rate in the world, with 3.66 percent. Six of the top ten in the world are in Africa, while the world average is only
1.13 percent.
When it comes to birth rate per 1000 people, Nigeria comes 29th with a rate of 36.07. Ghana has a rate of 28.09,
in 48th position. Those of the US and China are 13.83 and 12.17 respectively. Niger republic again comes first
with 51.08 while the world average is 19.86. All the top ten countries are in Africa.
The death rate for Nigeria is 16.31 per 1000 people, placing us at an unenviable 6th position in the whole world.
Ghana has a respectable rate at 8.93, in 76th position. The US places 91st with a rate of 8.38 and China does
very well with a rate of 6.89, in 142nd position. Haiti comes ahead of everyone in this grim category with a
32.31. This accounts for its negative growth rate, as its death rate is greater than its birth rate. Surprisingly, South
Africa comes in at 5th position with 16.99. The world average is 8.37. Again, six of the top ten are to be found in
Africa.
Our infant mortality rate per 1000 live births stands at 92.99. This puts us in the 10th position. Ghana has a rate
of 49.89, qualifying for 52nd position while China is in the 114th position with 16.51 and the US comes 178th
with a rate of 6.14. Of the top ten countries in this category, nine of them are African. Only Afghanistan is
unfortunate to be in this group, outside non-African countries. The world average is 44.13.
Our life expectancy at birth follows the same sad trend. Nigerians are expected to live 47.24 years on the average.
This puts us in the 220th position, out of 224 countries. Ghanaians are expected to live 60.55 years, for 187th
position. The Chinese have a life expectancy of 74.51 years, placing them in the 94th position and the US is at
49th place with a life expectancy of 78.24 years. The world average is 66.12 years. Monaco is first with 89.78
years while Haiti comes in dead last, all puns intended, with a life expectancy of 29.93 years. Out of the bottom
43 countries, 41 are African countries, with Haiti and Afghanistan as the only outsiders.
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
125
The world average for total fertility rate i.e. the number of children born per woman, according to 2010 estimates
is 2.56. That of Nigeria is 4.82 for 29th position. Our sister African country, Ghana has a rate of 3.57 for 46th
position. The rate for Americans is 2.06, placing them at 125th position and China has a rate of 1.54 for 183rd
position. Niger republic comes first with 7.68 and the top 12 countries are all African.
HIV/AIDS adult prevalence rate by 2007 estimates is 3.10 percent for Nigeria for a 23rd placing. Ghana's rate is
1.90 for 33rd place and China has a rate of 0.10 for 115th position. The US has a rate of 0.60 for 70th position.
All the top 23 countries are in Africa and the world average is 0.80.
When it comes to people living with HIV/AIDS however, our large population puts us in a very unenviable 3rd
position with 2.6 million people. Ghana has exactly one tenth of Nigeria's number, with 260,000 people, China
has 700,000 and the US has 1.2 million affected people.
Take for instance the literacy level. Only 68 percent of Nigerians are literate. We occupy the 171st position. This
is one of the few instances where we fare better than Ghana. She has a literacy rate of 57.9 percent for 186th
place. The US comes 37th with a rate of 99 percent while China's rate is 91.60 percent for 114th position in the
world. Andorra and seven other countries have a literacy rate of 100 percent. The last thirteen countries are in
Africa, except for Afghanistan. Burkina Fasso brings up the dumb rear with a rate of 21.80.
Closely linked to literacy rate is the expenditure on education, as a percentage of the GDP. It is a shame and a
disaster that we spend 0.90 percent of our GDP on education. This puts us in the 183rd position. Ghana, without
the same resources that we have, spends 5.40 percent and is in the 52nd place. China spends 1.90 percent for
172nd position and the US places 46th with 5.50 percent of GDP spent on education. This is one of the areas
where the effect of embezzlement of public funds really manifests.
70 percent of Nigerians live below the poverty line, for 8th position in the world. By comparison, only 28.50
percent of Ghanaians live below the poverty line, for 74th in the world. Twelve percent of Americans live below
the poverty line and that puts the US in 130th position. China occupies the 151st place with only 2.80 of the
population living below poverty line. Zambia is first in this dubious category with a whopping 86 percent of her
citizens qualified to be called poor. 7 of the top 10 and 13 of the top 20 are African countries.
There is a curious category in which it appears that Nigeria does well. This is in the category of Mobile cellular
phone users. There are almost 63 million cell phones in use in Nigeria. This ordinarily puts us in a very enviable
16th position. However, if one considers the fact that an average person in Nigeria has two to three cell phones;
the actual number of users is in the region of 20 million. By sheer force of numbers, the Chinese use 747 million
cell phones. The US comes in third at 270 million cell phone users.
As for land lines, Nigeria lag behind in 68th position with 1.3 million lines. China again comes in first with 313
million lines and the US comes second with 150 million lines. Ghana is 117th with 267,400 lines. Had we been
made of more serious stuff, we could have taken the opportunity provided by the reduction in demand for land
lines, with the advent of mobile GSM lines, to expand land lines to places that were under served before. Land
lines are needed for facsimile (fax), Internet connections and other uses.
In the category of Internet hosts, we have 1,378 hosts for 164th place. Ghana has 41,082 hosts for 94th place.
China has 15.2 million for 6th position and the US has an unbelievable number of 439 million hosts for first
place. Relatively poorer African countries like Gambia, Burkina Fasso, Swaziland, Botswana, Congo, Angola,
Cote d'Ivoire, Libya, Zambia, Uganda and Mozambique all have many more than we have.
Finally, let us look at airports. The US has 15,079 airports. The nearest is Brazil with 4072 airports. China comes
in a poor 15th with 502. This is one of the sound reasons why China will for now, belong to the second world.
Nigeria has 54 airports to place 86th in the world and Ghana has 11 for 155th place. The number of airports
should normally correlate with a country's population and land mass. It is therefore not surprising that large
countries like the US, Brazil, Mexico and Canada come in tops.
One common trend to these indices of underdevelopment is that Nigeria occupy top places in those bad
categories like infant mortality rate, death rate, HIV/AIDS prevalence, percentage living below the poverty line,
while we are in the bottom of the ladder in good ones like literacy rate, life expectancy rate, expenditure on
education, number of airports, number of Internet hosts, number of telephones.
7. Recommendations
This paper recommends that
1. African political and economic scholars should stop fixing blame; instead, they should fix the problem.
For instance, they should bring to fore that fact that African leaders have connived within themselves
and conspired to squeeze dry the orange and then discard it. Maybe that is why they save their monies
abroad; have their investments over there too. Even though it is obvious that the whites (Europeans)
exploited Africa, some would say that they are still exploiting us; this paper revealed that the
exploitation of Africa by Africans for the past 50 year plus is what has kept Africa down. They have
blamed the whites enough and allowing our leaders to hide behind this misleads to keep exploiting us
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
126
and at the same time miseducated the masses. Let us fix our problems instead of fixing blame because
the colonial masters have left officially and the blame and glory is ours now alone to share.
2. In fixing our problems, African leaders should invest in their home countries. This is necessary because
without investment, unemployment thrives; poverty, hunger and starvation looms large and most
importantly, underdevelopment soars higher than the eagles. The Billions of Dollars stashed away in
foreign banks are what suppose to established companies; recruit people; services their payment;
provide essential amenities that will make life worth living. Without these monies in the African soil,
Africa can never development. Therefore, if Africa most develops, they most develop themselves by
investing all their monies in their land. This is the only way to achieve the internal growth policy that
Andre Gunder Frank proposed. Therefore, African/Nigerian leaders should repatriate those monies
lodged in foreign Bank accounts and use them to develop their land by investing their lands under their
names. As a matter of policy, the stolen monies of the African leaders if traced anywhere oversea
should be confiscated by the authorities of that country. This point was what Rodney was decrying
about when he lamented ‘captives were shipped outside, instead of being utilized within any given
Africa community for creating wealth from nature; hence to achieve economic development, one
essential condition is to make the maximum use of the country’s labour and natural resources. The
shipping of slaves outside Africa he talked about aptly represents the lodging of their loots in foreign
accounts, instead of using them to develop Africa.
3. A total revamp of Africa’s political landscape advocated as tremendous changes in the politics and
leadership of Africa/Nigeria is needed such that mediocrity will give way for meritocracy as democratic
good governance will ensure economic prosperity for all and at the same time ensure a peaceful, strong
and virile economy based on harmonious co-existence where tolerance will be the watch word. Such
will put an end to this perennial religious violence, political and ethic strives, alongside the fatalistically
exalted political trend- corruption. .
4. An intellectual revolution; not violence should be advocated for as even organized violence as Kyari
recommended will not work in the interest of the poor and exploited masses. This is because revolution
will still consume the lives of the masses and the elites will be saved abroad where they would have
gone to hide their children and themselves. They will come back after the revolution to rule again hence
their wealth stored in foreign accounts will be save and subsequently deployed to ensure that they
continue their domination over the masses. This paper’s idea of intellectual revolution is based on the
assertion that educated and enlightened people are the easiest to rule but the hardest to manipulate. Such
will only occur if and when we embrace a paradigm shift from pseudo-intellectualism as it concerns
dependency theory and teach the truth- the reality of African/Nigerian underdevelopment: causes and
then proffer solutions.
8. Conclusion
Nigeria, with its oil wealth, is different from many other neo-colonial countries as the majority of the ruling elite
do not really care about developing the manufacturing or agricultural sectors of the economy as the only sure
source of wealth in Nigeria is the daily inflow of $30m petrodollars into the regime's off-shore bank accounts.
This now makes up at least 85% of total government revenue and is the 'pot of gold' over which the elite fight.
Corruption and financial swindles are the easiest way to make money in Nigeria, certainly better than the
unpredictable fluctuations of industrial production or 'normal' trade (Salimu, 1998). The London Times reported
one estimate that, since the early 1970s, Nigerian leaders have amassed personal fortunes totaling $217bn in
foreign, mainly Swiss and Lebanese, banks. The Times estimated that Abacha himself accumulated $5.8bn
during his nearly five years in power (London Times, 2002).
The one that is brewing currently is Jonathan Administration’s involvement in a #155bn oil scandal which the
federal government has refused to comment on. This is quite different from the fuel subsidy fraud whose report
has been handed over the EFCC for arrest and prosecution. Even the EFCC was said to be involved; this is the
nation’s anti-graft agency. On this issue, a forum called the congress for progressive change in Nigeria said that
Jonathan administration is more concerned with looting than governance when their spokesman, Rotimi Fasakin
asserted “after the death of Abacha, much noise was made on the tens of billions of naira that later became
known as Abacha loot, little did we know that successive PDP governments would dwarf his records in mindless
rapaciousness and kleptomaniac imprudence. But in these sleazy records, Jonathan Administration beats them all.
No inspiring governance, only looting”
The campaign for democracy president, Joe Okei-Odumakin, said that with the money laundry allegation, the
Jonathan government had taken corruption to a new height, hence it is now one day one scandal yet no one has
resigned in all the mind boggling corruption scandals under Jonathan Administration shows that he is friendly
with corruption and that is very sad because in Italy, Umberto Bossi, the firebrand leader of Italy’s opposition
Northern League Party reigned on Thursday after allegation that taxpayers’ money was used to pay for
renovations at this villa and holidays for his children
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
127
Confirming our theme- How Nigerian underdeveloped Nigeria, Alhaji Balarabe Musa, simply noted that he was
not surprised that Jonathan could be named in such act. According to him, it was impossible for anybody in
Nigeria to become president or governor without pilfering the nation’s treasury. He said that he had always
maintained that all Nigerian leaders are thieves.
The Nigeria’s perennial backwardness and underdevelopment had been blamed on bad leadership, greed and
corruption. On the solution, Former Lagos Deputy Governor, Mr. Femi Pedro, said only drastic actions can save
the nation from corruption. He further suggested the China option to arrest graft in the nation. In addendum, he
explained, ‘’Today in China, it is "steal be caught and be executed". Interestingly no one wants to die so
corruption has been dealt with in that country. ‘’China today has risen from a poverty stricken nation that dwelt
on rice alone to the second largest industrial market in the world".
Olumide Akande, called for reduction of cost of governance and operational expenses. According to him, "Most
of the people who today are in government have no agenda more than to lick the honey and drink the milk at the
centre. Let Nigeria make the centre less financially attractive and we shall see a great change, (Oguntola, 2012).
This call was made considering the payment of Nigerian legislators.
Truthfully, African/Nigerian underdevelopment is caused by the incessant corruption imbedded in bad leadership
that had bedeviled African states since independence. This is why this paper calls for a paradigm shift in the
study of Africa’s underdevelopment. Instead of looking outside, we simply have to look inward and see our
problems steering at us, and then we can handle them head long.
REFERENCES
Achebe, C (1983) The trouble with Nigeria. Enugu; Forth dimension Publishers
Amin S. (1976), 'Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism' New
York: Monthly Review Press.
Amin, S. (1974), Accumulation on a World Scale. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Andre Gunder Frank, (1972), "The Development of Underdevelopment," in James D. Cockcroft, Andre Gunder
Frank, and Dale Johnson, eds., Dependence and Underdevelopment. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books.
Arizona-Ogwu, L.C (2008), 48 years of Nigeria’s underdevelopment; a fruit of failed and Recycling Policy.
www.nigeriansinamerica.com
Axline, W.A (2009) Underdevelopment, dependence and integration; the politics of regionalism in the third
world. www.journals.cambridge.org
Ayittey, G. (1998), Africa in Chaos; a comparative history. www.amazon.com
Ayittey, G. (2011) War on African Dictatorship. www.ecadforum.com
Bashir, Adefaka (2011) “How Politicians underdeveloped Nigeria- Bafarawa”. www.vanguardngr.com
Barkun, Michael (2003). A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Chaliand, G (2000) Third world’ definitions and description. www.thirdworldtraveller.com
Diamond, L.J (1991) Nigeria’s Perennial Struggle. Journal of democracy, Vol.2, No.4, pp73-85
www.journalofdemocracy.org
Dye, T. R. (2000) Top down Policymaking. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
Eme, O. I & Emeh, I.E.J (2012) “Bureaucracy and Rural Development; the Role of Public Administration in
National Development: The Nigerian Perspective”. Global Journal of Management and Business Research.
Volume 12 Issue 4 Version 1.0 March 2012. Pp.19-40.
Eneh, J.O and Okolo, C.B (2003) the common Good and Political Stability, in Maduabuchi Dukor: ed
Philosophy and Politics-Discourse on Values, Politics and Power in Africa. Lagos, Malthouse Press Ltd.
Eranga O.I (2008), Nigeria @ 48 still underdeveloped. www.nigerianobservernews.com
Fayemi, O (2010) taming the scourge of corruption in Nigeria. www.onigbongbogov.org
Ewubare, Roland (2012) “Impunity: The Source of Nigeria’s Underdevelopment” www.saharareports.com
Femi, ajayi (2010) “How the National Assembly underdeveloped Nigeria Nascent Democracy”
www.nigeriaworld.com
Frithjof Kuhnen (1987), causes of underdevelopment and concepts for Development; an introduction to
development theories. The Journal of Institute of Development Studies, NWFP Agricultural Vol. VIII, 1986,
University, Peshawar.
Ghanaian Chronicle, (2000). How African Leaders Under-Develop Africa. http://www.somaliawatch.org
Goldberg, Robert Alan (2001). Enemies Within: The Culture of Conspiracy in Modern America. New Haven &
London: Yale University Press. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite_theory
Izuchukwu, R.M (2010) Economic dependence and third world underdevelopment; the Nigerian experience.
www.caritauni.edu.ng
Jean Francois Bayart, Stephen Elis and Beatrice Hibou (1990) The Criminalization of African States in Africa.
International Journal of African and Asian Studies - An Open Access International Journal
Vol.1 2013
128
Karl Maier (2000) This House has fallen; Nigeria in crisis. London, Penguin Books Ltd. www.amazon.com
Kenneth, P. Ruscio (2004) the Leadership Dilemma in Modern Democracy; Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, UK;
and Massachusetts, USA.
Kolawole, Simon (2012) “How Lawmakers Underdeveloped Nigeria”. www.thisdaylive.com
Kyari, T (2008) Metaphors of underdevelopment; reflections from Nigeria. www.londonmet.ac.uk
Madike, E. et al (2010) “ Halliburton: Unmasking the Masquerade”, Sunday Independent Newspaper, April, 25.
Nnadozie, O.U (2006) External forces, Democracy and underdevelopment in Nigeria; a prognosis. A paper
presented at Two-Day International Workshop on global and Regional Hegemonic dilemmas in the South held in
Bangkok Thailand between 29
th
and 30
th
.
Nnadozie, O.U (2010) Why poverty in Africa. Nsukka; Bel’s Book.
Nnoli, O (1986) “Introduction to Politics”, Lagos, Longman Groups Ltd.
Olagunju, S (2010) Nigeria at 50. www.tribune.com.ng/sat/index
Odigbo, P.C. and Adediran, k. T. (2009) “Promoting Cooperative Effectiveness for Rural Development in
Nigeria” Africa Journal of Social Policy Studies Vols. 1, No.2.
Ope-Agbe, Fazil ,O (2007) “How Nigerians Underdeveloped Nigeria”. www.dawodu.com/agbe3.htm
Osvaldo Sunkel (1969),"National Development Policy and External Dependence in Latin America," The Journal
of Development Studies, Vol. 6, no. 1, October, p. 23)
Rodney, W. (1972) How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Washington: Howard University Press.
Rostow, W.W. (1960), The Stages of Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto.: Cambridge University Press.
Salimu (1998), A history of Capitalist Development. www.socialismtoday.org
Seers, D.(1969) “ The Meaning of Development”, International Development Review, Vol.6. December.
Simon, D. (2004) “Recent Trends in Development Theory and Policy: Implication for Democratization and
Government” Governance-Nigeria and the World, CENCOD: Ikeja.
Sunday Oguntola (2012) Why Nigeria is underdeveloped’ http://tribune.com.ng/index.
Susanne Bodenheimer, (1971), "Dependency and Imperialism: The Roots of Latin American
Underdevelopment," in K.T. Fann and Donald C. Hodges, eds., Readings in U.S. Imperialism. Boston: Porter
Sergeant, p. 226
Theotonio Dos Santos, (1970), "The Structure of Dependence," in K.T. Fann and Donald C. Hodges, eds.,
Readings in U.S. Imperialism. Boston: Porter Sergeant, p. 226
Todaro, M. (1992) Economic for a Developing World: An Introduction to Principles, problems and Policies for
Development”. London, Longman Group Limited.
Umebali, E. E. and Akubuilo, C. J. C. (2006) “Principles of Rural Development” Readings in Cooperative
Economics and Management, Computer Edge Publishers: Lagos.
Vincent Ferraro, (1996), Dependency Theory: An Introduction, Mount Holyoke College South Hadley, MA
Wallerstein, I. (1974), the Modern World-System. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Wilmot, p. (2007) Nigeria- The nightmare Scenario; Ibadan, Bookcraft.
World Fact Book (2012) How really underdeveloped is Nigeria?
http://nigeriaworld.com/articles/2011/jul/211.html
... The contribution of irrigated agriculture to crop production is, therefore, minimal. According to Emeh (2013), the primary cause of food insecurity in developing countries is people's inability to access food due to widespread poverty and unemployment, inhibiting purchasing power and preventing assured access to food supplies. FAO (1983) af irmed that food price volatility has exerted considerable pressure on global food security, and many Nigerians depend on the market for their food supply and are vulnerable to high food prices. ...
... Statistics from Gombe State alone, as compiled by Gombe State Emergency Management Agency (GSEMA), show that about 999 farmlands in the state were affected by loods that destroyed yams, maize, vegetable, sugarcane, and cassava farms in 2007 when data from other states are added together, no doubt, the ripple effect becomes staggering. Arguing for the reasons that accounted for food insecurity in Nigeria, Emeh (2013) submitted that the inherent characteristics of climate that manifest themselves as changes of climate over some time affect food security signi icantly in unpredictable ways as a result of their detrimental effect on pests, crops diseases, crop production, animal husbandry, and humans. Changing climatic conditions affect certain preferred food items' physical and economic availability. ...
... The agency warned that the country will face a famine by the end of this year because most of the small-scale farmers and mechanized farmers in Nigeria" 's northeast are threatened by terrorist attacks. The attacks on these farmers who produce beans, onions, pepper, maize, rice, livestock, and cat ish in the Lake Chad area for the southern states, have forced them to migrate since the Boko Haram insurgency broke out in Borno State in July 2009 (Emeh, 2013). Flood, drought, and deserti ication are environmental issues affecting food availability in Nigeria. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study looked at Nigeria's food security and economic dependence. Nigeria has enormous agricultural potential but has remained a net importer of agricultural products over the past few decades. Due to intentional neglect of agriculture in the early 1970s, Nigeria lost its standing as a signi icant global exporter of agricultural products, including food, which had a detrimental effect on food security. This study examined the effects of economic dependency on food security in Nigeria because prior efforts to boost food production did not consider the systemic rami ications of economic dependency. A qualitative method was used in which published materials such as journal articles were consulted and analyzed using content analysis. Dependency Theory was the study's foundation. Based on indings, Traditional farming techniques and knowledge have been lost due to the nation's reliance on imported food. This disruption needs to improve the ability of the local communities to produce enough food. Additionally, it impairs their ability to grow a wide range of nutrient-dense foods. It makes it harder for them to adjust to changing environmental conditions, exacerbating malnourishment, hunger, inequality, illnesses, and other food poverty-related problems across the continent. Therefore, Nigeria should mobilize domestic resources to enhance local food production to achieve food suf iciency rather than relying solely on food imports. Food security requires deliberate strategies such as research, value addition, and infrastructure development.
... According to him, the process of capitalist expansion which led to development in Europe and America also led to underdevelopment in Third World countries. Similarly, Eme (2003), averred that the capitalist world economic system is organized to ensure the continuous domination of the periphery by the core and dependence of the periphery on the core, thereby ensuring a continual flow of surplus from the periphery to the metropolis or centre. Consequently, dependency theorists recommend that if Third World countries are to be developed, they must sever their ties with the advanced, capitalist countries. ...
Article
Full-text available
Development is crucial for the survival of any nation, and a country is said to be developed when it is able to provide qualitative living standard for its citizens. This paper identifies Nigeria as a country who, in spite of her huge resources, has failed in its development efforts, as evident in high level of poverty and inequality in the country. Using a case analysis approach, the paper relies on documentary instruments for data generation, as well as content analysis of generated data. It discovers that most of Nigeria's developmental problems are internally generated and perpetuated by the country's political elites who are highly selfish, corrupt and inefficient. The paper concludes that while Nigeria is trapped in the web of underdevelopment and its attendant consequences; the situation is not irredeemable, provided the leadership of the country is willing to make sound political, economic and social decisions. Accordingly, it identified the need for government to reexamine the culture of governance in Nigeria, by creating policies aimed at reducing the cost of governance and promoting accountability in the country, among other things.
... In this sense, development and underdevelopment are contained in a single integrated capitalist economic system, rather than sequentially related stages of growth (Frank, 1969). Given the deliberate unequal structuring of global finance, underdevelopment is not a pre-capitalist condition that all countries go through, but rather a unique condition that is a result of global relations (Emeh, 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
With an abundance of nature-based tourist attractions, South Africa is in a good position to take advantage of a booming interest in adventure and eco-tourism. The poverty and unemployment crippling rural communities means that the economic, social, and environmental benefits the sector potentially offers cannot be ignored. Equally important, as participatory development has alluded to, are the social issues within target communities. Given how necessary job creation is, especially for resource-rich but poor village communities. The question that sparked this study is why the Tyusha tourism project, which has been championed by developers over the years, failed to materialise. The starting point of the research was whether, as the literature suggests, the failure of the project was due to a lack of community involvement. The interviews conducted indicated that participation was not the issue. The community was consulted, and been part of the (wider) formative discussions. The main issue holding the project back was conflict amongst the community (or project) leadership group. Through a close reading of participatory development critiques, the article finds that conflict is part and parcel of community development work. Furthermore, the article concludes that participatory development communication is a good vehicle to carry the mandate of community empowerment and mediation of conflict in development initiatives.
... Dependency Theory, developed in the 1960s, argues that developing countries are dependent on more developed nations for resources, technology, and economic opportunities, which perpetuates a cycle of underdevelopment (Emeh 2013). This theory is particularly relevant in analyzing Nigeria's food security challenges, as the country remains reliant on food imports and foreign aid to meet its population's needs, despite its agricultural potential. ...
Article
Full-text available
Food security in Nigeria has become a precarious political and social issue, interwoven with socioeconomic inequalities and political decisions. The politics of food security in Nigeria directly impacts social change, influencing everything from rural livelihoods to national stability. This paper explores the complicated relationship between food security and social change, focusing on how political influences shape food accessibility, distribution, and consumption patterns. With over 70% of the population living in food insecurity, the role of political instability, government policies, and economic challenges cannot be overlooked. Additionally, malnutrition remains prevalent, particularly in vulnerable groups such as children and internally displaced persons (IDPs), exacerbated by inefficient governance and inadequate agricultural policies. The paper examines how political elites use food security as a tool for political leverage, resulting in a fragmented approach to addressing the underlying causes of hunger. The paper applies theoretical lenses such as Political Economy and Social Change Theory to explore these dynamics in detail. Using a historical and contemporary analysis of Nigerian agriculture, government policy, and international relations, this paper discusses the need for sustainable policies that bridge the gap between food production, distribution, and consumption, alongside the role of government agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and international bodies in mitigating this crisis. The study concludes that unless food security is treated as a national priority, social inequalities and poverty will continue to rise, preventing the achievement of social change in Nigeria.
... The third finding showed that dependency syndrome has prevented the growth of internal factors that enhance the ability of the state to achieve sustainable development. Emeh (2013) and Turhan (2018) argued that dependency syndrome inhibits the growth of internal factors, such as governance and domestic policies, and prevents them from shaping development outcomes. In Africa's international relations, dependency syndrome has instead influenced African elites to perpetuate underdevelopment. ...
Article
Full-text available
Using a qualitative research methodology and exploratory approach to collect data, this study assessed the effects of dependency syndrome within Africa's international relations and its repercussions for achieving sustainable development. The collected data were analysed using document and content analysis techniques. The study revealed that dependency syndrome within Africa's international relations has led to aid dependency, political violence, and poverty. It has promoted laziness and an inferiority complex that affects the working conditions of Africans. Further, it has promoted corruption and affected the rule of law for good governance; yet, sustainable development cannot occur without it. Moreover, dependency syndrome has inhibited innovation and led to the destruction of the local industries that are key to achieving sustainable development. The results of the study found that dependency syndrome has prevented the development of a robust transport network system that could promote African trade relations, which would lead to sustainable development. The results also posited that chronic poverty and underdevelopment in Africa are perpetuated by the dependency syndrome within Africa's international relations. The study recommended that Africa needs to overcome dependency syndrome and reform her international relations with external world. This would require establishing a continental sovereignty that enables the continent to have one common foreign policy within its planning diplomacy endeavours.
... These processes created a global economic system where the economy of Nigeria and Africa at large is tied to the economies of the West. This has engendered an unequal trade relation where the Nigerian state, like most African states produce and export raw or unfinished primary goods at a cheap rate to the developed Western countries, while importing finished secondary products at a high rate from the developed countries (Emeh, 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
UATJOGAP covers issues in social, management sciences, behavioural Sciences, financial administration and policy studies etc.
Article
Full-text available
Academic inquiry into theoretical positions on sustainable development in Africa have risen to prominence in recent times. This paper questions the traditional paradigms of thought on Africa’s underdevelopment. It advances novel perspectives in rethinking resource governance by suggesting that an Induced Cumulative Causative Theory is key to understanding the proverbial ‘box’ in which Africans have to think out of to re-invent resource governance. The paper makes the connect between historical colonial antecedents of foreign resource control with the present proxy control of the same resources as a key structure that needs re�inventing in the face of the ‘New scramble for Africa’. The paper suggests that depreciating global resources has put Africa in the crosshairs global imperial forces making the control of Africa’s resources by Africans a near�impossible task. Policymakers will face the task of reinventing Africa’s engagement with International corporations who are at the forefront the ‘New Scramble’. The paper recommends that the control of African resources should be placed at the centre of the discourse on confronting the ‘new scramble’.
Article
The level of external debt of a country is of fundamental importance in every economy, as external debt may reflect the effectiveness and efficiency of an economy. The study was motivated by the ever-increasing rate at which Ghana has consistently borrowed from external sources. This study aimed to assess the relationship between external debt financing and gross domestic product and establish the determinants of external debt financing in Ghana. Using selected time series data (Gross domestic product, external debt, population growth, inflation, Literacy rate, export of goods and service, general government expenditure, and interest on external debt, 1978 - 2017) based on literature reviewed on the macro economy of Ghana, the study employed Autoregressive Distributed lag model (ARDL) after the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic and Philip Perron proofs not to be stationary at levels but stationary at first difference. For that matter, ARDL was used to assess the impact of external debt financing on GDP to establish the determinants of external debt. Diagnostic tests which include auto-correlation, heteroscedasticity, and normality were also performed. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that, variables were related only in the short run but not related in the long run. It was recommended that, external borrowing, population growth, inflation, general government expenditure and literacy rate should be control since their coefficients proves to have negative impact on GDP and on external debts
Chapter
Full-text available
In today’s society, social inequality is a deeply ingrained issue that affects people on multiple levels of identification. Traditional approaches to resolving inequality, on the other hand, frequently fail to take into consideration the intricate ways in which different identities intersect. “Intersectionality,” highlights race, gender, class, and sexual orientation—interact and influence how a person is privileged or marginalised. This approach offers a crucial perspective for appreciating the multifaceted character of socioeconomic inequality. Gaining a greater knowledge of the specific issues faced by individuals at the intersections of several marginalised groups allows us to better grasp how diverse identities interact. A multifaceted strategy is needed to effectively address the intersectional nature of social injustice. This paper proposes that policymakers should make sure that marginalised communities’ perspectives are heard and are actively involved in the decision-making process. Additionally, it is critical to raise awareness and knowledge of intersectionality among a range of stakeholders, such as the public, educators, and legislators. This paper used secondary sources as its technique, and text content analysis was used to derive pertinent insights from the data that were gathered. This paper has four recommendations directed to policymakers on how socioeconomic inequality could be addressed
Article
Full-text available
The relationship between Public Administration and National Development has lost its vigour, dynamism and interest because of criticisms that has trailed the role of the public bureaucracy in rural development in Nigeria. This is exasperated by the inadequacies of Public Bureaucracy in engendering Rural Development, justified by the enormous developmental policies and programmes that are deliberately rural-based in Nigeria yet these rural areas are still grossly unattractive to live in. This concern is insufferably disheartening because public bureaucracy exists in any society for the convenience of effective and efficient service delivery. The great and dire need for development especially in the rural areas amidst abundant human and material resources in Nigeria has occasioned the great tendency to blame politicians for the poverty, underdevelopment, and colossal leadership tragedy that best describes the contemporary Nigerian society. This is because from military dictatorship to 'democratic governments' all have conspired to reduce governance to the manipulation of public office to deceive and loot public funds for personal aggrandisement.
Article
We cannot hope to formulate adequate development theory and policy for the majority of the world's population who suffer from underdevelopment without first learning how their past economic and social history gave rise to their present underdevelopment. Yet most historians study only the developed metropolitan countries and pay scant attention to the colonial and underdeveloped lands. For this reason most of our theoretical categories and guides to development policy have been distilled exclusively from the historical experience of the European and North American advanced capitalist nations. This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full. Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website.