A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Science Education and Technology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Electrifying Engagement in Middle School Science Class:
Improving Student Interest Through E-textiles
Colby Tofel-Grehl
1
&Deborah Fields
1
&Kristin Searle
1
&Cathy Maahs-Fladung
1
&
David Feldon
1
&Grace Gu
1
&Chongning Sun
1
Published online: 23 March 2017
#Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017
Abstract Most interventions with Bmaker^technologies take
place outside of school or out of core area classrooms.
However, intervening in schools holds potential for reaching
much larger numbers of students and the opportunity to shift
instructional dynamics in classrooms. This paper shares one
such intervention where electronic textiles (sewable circuits)
were introduced into eighth grade science classes with the
intent of exploring possible gains in student learning and
motivation, particularly for underrepresented minorities.
Using a quasi-experimental design, four classes engaged
in a traditional circuitry unit while the other four classes
undertook a new e-textile unit. Overall, students in both
groups demonstrated significant learning gains on standard
test items without significant differences between conditions.
Significant differences appeared between groups’attitudes
toward science after the units in ways that show increasing
interest in science by students in the e-textile unit. In particular,
they reported positive identity shifts pertaining to their percep-
tions of the beliefs of their friends, family, and teacher. Findings
and prior research suggest that student-created e-textile designs
provide opportunities for connections outside of the classroom
with friends and family and may shift students’perceptions of
their teacher’s beliefs about them more positively.
Keywords Science education .Electronic textiles .Maker
movement .DIY media .Perception of science .Interest
Introduction
The U.S. Department of Commerce projects science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-related employment will
increase 7% more than other sectors by 2018, with technology
acting as the major economic driver (Bureau of Labor Statistics
2013; Langdon et al. 2011). Currently, only 16% of U.S. under-
graduates choose a natural science or engineering major
(National Science Board [NSB] 2010), reflecting both a lack
of preparation and interest in STEM fields (PCAST 2010;
Taietal.2006). Further, women (29% of STEM workforce)
and historically underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities
(11% of STEM workforce) are substantially underrepresented
across STEM disciplines (NSB 2016). According to the
Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women
and Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology
Development (2000), diversifying the pipeline of prospective
STEM workers would both permit labor supply to meet
projected demand and engage a greater diversity of perspec-
tives that could increase the rate of innovation.
In addition to a Bparticipation gap^in STEM fields, many
individuals from groups underrepresented in STEM fields expe-
rience an Bidentity gap,^where they struggle to see themselves
*Colby Tofel-Grehl
colby.tg@usu.edu
Deborah Fields
deborah.fields@usu.edu
Kristin Searle
Kristin.Searle@usu.edu
Cathy Maahs-Fladung
cathy.maahs-fladung@usu.edu
David Feldon
David.feldon@usu.edu
Grace Gu
icyringer@gmail.com
Chongning Sun
vincent.sun@aggiemail.usu.edu
1
Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA
J Sci Educ Technol (2017) 26:406–417
DOI 10.1007/s10956-017-9688-y
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.