Flooding has always been a major risk world-wide. Humans chose to live
and develop settlements close to water (rivers, seas) due to the
resources water brings, i.e. food, energy, capacity to economically
transport persons and goods, and recreation. However, the risk from
flooding, including pluvial flooding, often offsets these huge
advantages. Floods sometimes have terrible consequences from
... [Show full abstract] both a
human and economic point of view. The permanence and growth of urban
areas in flood-prone zones despite these risks is a clear indication of
the choices of concerned human groups. The observed growing
concentration of population along the sea shore, the increase of urban
population worldwide, the exponential growth of the world population and
possibly climate change are factors that confirm flood will remain a
major issue for the next decades. Flood management systems are designed
and implemented to cope with such situations. In spite of frequent
events, lessons look to be difficult to draw out and progresses are
rather slow. The list of potential triggers to improve flood management
systems is nevertheless well established: information, education,
awareness raising, alert, prevention, protection, feedback from events,
... Many disciplines are concerned which cover a wide range of soft and
hard sciences. A huge amount of both printed and electronic literature
is available. Regulations are abundant. In spite of all these
potentially favourable elements, similar questions spring up after each
new significant event: • Was the event forecast precise enough?
• Was the alert system efficient? • Why were buildings built
in identified flood prone areas? • Why did the concerned population
not follow instructions? • Why did the dike break? • What
should we do to avoid it happens again? • What about damages
evaluation, wastes and debris evacuation, infrastructures and buildings
repair, activity recovery, temporary relocation of inhabitants, health
concerns, insurance concerns, water-resistant materials, vulnerability
assessment ? Flood resilient system (FReS) concept has been proposed as
a new framework to address flood situations. Such systems intend to
better approach such situations from a holistic point of view. FReS
encompass ecologic, spatial, structural, social, disaster relief and
flood risk aspects. FReS design and implementation conditions have been
addressed by the FP7 SMARTeST (Smart Resilience Technology, Systems and
Tools) project. The focus of this Project on the use of available and
innovative communication, forecasting and flood protection technologies
leads to an original contribution which highlights both the scope and
the limits of this technology driven approach. These reflexions
contribute to the elaboration of guidelines for the design of FReS.