ArticlePDF Available

The nanomedicine landscape of South Africa

De Gruyter
Nanotechnology Reviews
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Nanomedicine is one of the most exciting applications of nanotechnology and promises to address several of mankind’s healthcare needs. South Africa is one of the countries engaged in nanomedicine research and product development on the African continent. In this article, we provide a top-level description of the policy, infrastructure, and human capital development programs supported by the South African government. We also highlight the nanomedicine outputs (publications, patents, and products) that have emanated from South Africa. This description of a “newly industrialized” country engagement in nanomedicine is important within the global context of nanomedicine development.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Nanotechnol Rev 2017; 6(4): 339–344
Nanotechnology Institutions contribution
Admire Dube* and Naushaad Ebrahim
The nanomedicine landscape of South Africa
DOI 10.1515/ntrev-2016-0108
Received December 11, 2016; accepted February 14, 2017; previously
published online March 20, 2017
Abstract: Nanomedicine is one of the most exciting appli-
cations of nanotechnology and promises to address sev-
eral of mankind’s healthcare needs. South Africa is one
of the countries engaged in nanomedicine research and
product development on the African continent. In this
article, we provide a top-level description of the policy,
infrastructure, and human capital development programs
supported by the South African government. We also high-
light the nanomedicine outputs (publications, patents,
and products) that have emanated from South Africa. This
description of a “newly industrialized” country engage-
ment in nanomedicine is important within the global con-
text of nanomedicine development.
Keywords: nanomedicine; nanoparticle drug delivery;
nanotechnology in South Africa; nanotechnology policy.
1 Introduction
Nanotechnology is recognized as one of the most important
scientific fields of the 21st century. Nanotechnology is the
application of engineered structures in the nanometer-scale
size range (often 100nm or smaller, but also 1–1000nm),
which possess desirable properties, e.g. magnetic, optical,
biochemical, or electronic properties, and are generally
applied to the benefit of mankind. Nanomedicine is the
application of nanotechnology in the field of health and
has demonstrated capability to improve the diagnosis and
treatment of diseases by providing novel disease biosen-
sors and improved drug delivery [1, 2]. Nanomedicine is
a multi-disciplinary field, encompassing pharmaceutical
and biomedical sciences, medicine, and physical sciences,
and is a field of intense global research and product devel-
opment [3]. To illustrate the extensive ongoing product
development, a study by Bobo et al. reported that there
are currently 51 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-
approved nanomedicines, 77 products undergoing clinical
trials, and approximately 40% of clinical trials were listed
in the clinicaltrials.gov database in 2014 or 2015 [4].
On the African continent, South Africa is one of the
countries engaged in nanomedicine research and product
development. South Africa is part of the five major emerg-
ing economies or newly industrialized countries, together
with Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The South African
government has made extensive investment toward creat-
ing a critical mass of infrastructure, equipment, and human
capital for nanotechnology research [5, 6]. In this article, we
provide a top-level overview of the nanotechnology policy,
funding, equipment, and human capital development pro-
grams supported by the South African government. We also
highlight the nanomedicine outputs (publications, patents,
and products) that have emanated from South Africa. This
description of a “newly industrialized” country engagement
in nanomedicine is important within the global context of
nanomedicine development [7–9]. Finally, we provide our
opinion of future strategies to leverage existing framework
and investment to support translation of nanomedicine
research findings for commercial and public benefit.
2 The South African disease
landscape
To contextualize nanomedicine research in South Africa,
it is important to describe the disease landscape. Africa,
in particular Sub-Saharan Africa, is disproportionately
challenged by a burden of infectious diseases (IDs)
including tuberculosis (TB) and HIV/AIDS, which nega-
tively impact its economy and the quality of life of African
people [10, 11]. The burden of TB in South Africa is among
the highest in the world. Total TB incidence (TB alone
plus TB-HIV co-infection) in South Africa is estimated to
be 834 per 100,000 population; and the mortality rate
is unacceptably high at 133 per 100,000 population [12].
TB that is resistant to existing drug therapies, i.e. multi-
drug resistant TB, is on the rise globally, more so in South
Africa, which is ranked among the high burden countries
[12]. A large number of people are living with HIV in South
*Corresponding author: Admire Dube, Nanomedicine Research
Group, School of Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape,
Bellville, South Africa, e-mail: adube@uwc.ac.za.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-6094
Naushaad Ebrahim: Nanomedicine Research Group, School of
Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
340     A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa
Africa, and the country has the largest number of people
on treatment in the world (approximately 3.4 million
people on treatment) [13].
In recent times, a new threat has emerged in the form
of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), i.e. cardiovascu-
lar disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and dia-
betes. In Africa, the probability of a person dying from one
of the four main NCDs (in persons aged between 30 and
70years) is over 20%, among the highest in the world [14].
Mortality due to NCDs is also high in South Africa [14].
Despite technological advances in medical diagno-
sis and treatment, deaths due to IDs and NCDs are still
common. Among the current requirements to mitigate
deaths is the need for more simple, inexpensive, rapid,
and sensitive point-of-care diagnostic tools, and drug
therapies providing uncomplicated treatment regimens
(e.g. short-duration oral treatments, once daily to weekly
dosing intervals) reduced toxicity and side effects [15, 16].
Nanomedicine has the potential to provide solutions to
these needs, enabling improved disease detection and
delivery of drugs. The reader is directed to some reviews
on the application of nanoparticles in diagnostics and
drug delivery [17, 18]. It is against the backdrop of disease
burden and the promise of nanomedicine that research-
ers in South Africa, with the support of the government,
have embarked in research and product development in
this field.
3 South African nanotechnology
policy and funding framework
National strategic leadership in nanotechnology is pro-
vided by the Department of Science and Technology (DST)
(www.dst.gov.za) and is described in National Nanotech-
nology Strategy (NNS) (http://www.gov.za/documents/
national-nanotechnology-strategy) published in 2005.
The publication of this strategy essentially heralded the
start of public funding in nanotechnology, with an invest-
ment of ZAR170million (approximately USD 12.2million at
an exchange rate of 1 USD = 14 ZAR) over the first 3years.
The NNS is aligned to the broad development goals of
South Africa and compliments other national strategies,
in particular, the Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Strategy, as well as the Biotechnology Strategy and the
Skills Development Strategy. The strategy emphasizes
nanotechnology research and development, i.e. mate-
rial synthesis, characterization, and fabrication. Health
(nanomedicine) is among the focus areas of the strategy.
The key initiatives of the NNS include establishment and
support of nanoscience characterization centers, funding
for research, and human resource development. Com-
plementary to the NNS is the Nanoscience and Nano-
technology 10-year Research Plan (http://www.gov.za/
documents/nanoscience-and-nanotechnology-10-year-
research-plan), which was released by the DST in 2010,
whose main purpose is to focus national research efforts
to deliver on the goals of the NNS. Key research ques-
tions within the nanomedicine scope of the research plan
include development of nanotechnology-based rapid,
simple, and user-friendly point-of-care diagnostic kits
for HIV and TB, nano-biosensors for in situ detection of
glucose levels, and the development of nanoparticle-
based drug delivery systems for TB treatment.
4 National nanotechnology
infrastructure
Public funding has facilitated the acquisition of nano-
technology-specific equipment for various research
councils and universities, through the National Nano-
technology Equipment Programme (NNEP) (http://hicd.
nrf.ac.za/?q=node/19). The NNEP was a specific funding
instrument as part of the implementation of the NNS,
intended to acquire, upgrade, or develop research equip-
ment for the analysis and characterization of nanoma-
terials in South Africa. The NNEP ended in 2015, after a
10-year investment and over ZAR400 million (over USD
28.6 million using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 14 ZAR)
invested. This amount excludes funding provided by
other equipment programs, e.g. the National Equipment
Program, which also provide for purchase of equipment
used for nanotechnology research. Table 1 summarizes
the key national facilities for nanotechnology research in
South Africa and some of the equipment and instruments
available at the facilities.
5 Human capital development
By and large, nanotechnology education (including
nanomedicine) is provided at postgraduate level [6, 19].
The flagship program in nanoscience and nanotechnol-
ogy education is the DST-funded 2-year Master’s degree
program leading to an MSc Nanoscience qualification.
This program is offered through collaboration between
the University of the Western Cape (the program-manag-
ing institution), University of Johannesburg, University
A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa     341
of the Free State, and Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Uni-
versity. Students undergo 9 months of didactic learning,
followed with a research project completed at any one of
the participating universities, under the stream of either
nanochemistry, nanophysics, or nanomedicine. In 2006,
the DST and the National Research Foundation (NRF)
established the South African Research Chairs Initiative
(SARChi) (http://www.nrf.ac.za/division/rcce/instru-
ments/research-chairs). The major expectation of SARChi
grant recipients is the production of high-quality post-
graduate students and research and innovation outputs.
To date, there are seven research chairs in nanotechnol-
ogy (with at least one chair focusing on nanomedicine).
6 Nanomedicine research in South
Africa
6.1 Drug delivery
We performed a review of publications emanating from
South Africa in the field of nanomedicine. We conducted
a search on PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed) using a Boolean search string, which included
the keywords nanoparticle or liposome, drug, protein and
gene delivery, and included an author/co-author based
at a South African institution. PubMed was selected as it
is one of the largest archives of biomedical literature and
also conducts a review of scientific quality of journals
prior to indexing. Therefore, we have some indication of
the level of quality of the publications captured by our
search.
We retrieved 137 eligible articles (published up to
December 2015), with the earliest article published in 1991.
Analysis of the number of articles per year is shown in
Figure 1. In the past decade, a surge in nanoparticle drug
delivery publications has been observed. This trend could
be related to the availability of nanotechnology funding
through the NNS and the NNEP. Of the articles published
during this period, 46% was in the ID space, with the
rest being related to NCDs, or not focused to a particular
disease, e.g. general nanomedicine reviews. This statistic
reflects the balance of the disease landscape in Africa.
All articles retrieved were preclinical studies, except for
two clinical studies, although it should be noted that
these clinical studies involved evaluation of the efficacy
and safety of commercially available nanomedicine prod-
ucts and were not a clinical evaluation of nanomedicines
developed by the researchers [20, 21].
Publications emanated primarily from 14higher edu-
cation institutions and science councils, i.e. the Univer-
sity of KwaZulu-Natal, University of the Witwatersrand,
Stellenbosch University, CSIR, University of Pretoria, Uni-
versity of Cape Town, Rhodes University, University of the
Western Cape, Tshwane University of Technology, North-
West University, University of Zululand, Nelson Mandela
Metropolitan University, South African Nuclear Energy
Corporation, and MINTEK. Higher education institutions
Table 1: List of the key national nanotechnology facilities in South Africa.
Facility name and location Equipment
Centre for Nanotechnology Innovation
Rhodes University, Grahamstown
https://www.ru.ac.za/nanotechnology/equipment/
TOF-SIMS
Microscopy Centre for High Resolution Transmission Electron
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth
http://chrtem.nmmu.ac.za/
ARM-TEM, STEM, FIB-SEM, AFM and nanoindenter
National Centre for Nano-Structured Materials
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth
http://chrtem.nmmu.ac.za/
FIB-SEM, small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering, AFM, TEM, SEM
National Cleanroom Facility
DST-Mintek Nanotechnology Innovation Centre (NIC)a, Pretoria
http://www.nic.ac.za/
Clean room, TEM, SEM, AFM
Selected key pieces of equipment available at a facility are listed.
ARM, atomic resolution microscope; SEM, scanning electron microscope; TEM, transmission electronic microscope; STEM, scan-
ning transmission electron microscopy; FIB, focused ion beam; AFM, atomic force microscope; TOF-SIMS, time of flight-secondary-ion
mass-spectrometer.
aNIC composed of research nodes located at three universities, i.e. Rhodes University (focused on the development of sensor technologies),
the University of the Western Cape on bio-labeling and drug delivery and the University of Johannesburg (focused on water treatment).
342     A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa
and science councils are also the focus of the NNS. We
retrieved three patents that relate to nanoparticle drug
delivery systems [22–24] by applying similar search cri-
teria (as used in PubMed) using the search site Google
patents.
It is notable that MINTEK has commercialized its
research outputs and markets gold, nanospheres, and
nanorods, including polyethylene glycol (PEG)-gold
nanoparticles and PEG-Biotin-gold nanoparticles to the
research community and industry (http://www.nic.ac.za/
products.html).
6.2 Diagnostics
We performed a search on PubMed of articles reporting
research into diagnostics for diseases, which incorporate
nanoparticles. Fogel and Limson performed an excellent
review of general biosensor research in South Africa [25],
and the reader is also directed to this review. Our search
string included the words surface plasmon resonance,
lateral flow, sensors, biosensors and cantilever/nano-
cantilever, disease, as applied by Wagner etal. [1]. The
search resulted in 15 articles meeting the criteria. Most
articles were published in 2014 (6) (Figure 1) with the first
PubMed-identified article published in 2007. An equal
distribution of publications was found when comparing
research for IDs versus NCDs (7), with one article includ-
ing both. These publications emanated mainly from six
academic institutions and science councils, namely, Uni-
versity of Johannesburg, University of Pretoria, University
of the Western Cape, University of the Free State, Univer-
sity of the Witwatersrand and Nanotechnology Innovation
Centre, Advanced Materials Division, MINTEKAt this time,
no research outputs have been commercialized.
7 Concluding remarks
Over the past 10years, the South African government has
laid a strong foundation for research and product devel-
opment in nanotechnology, establishing policy frame-
work and making significant investments in equipment
and infrastructure, research funding, and human capital
development at universities and science councils through-
out the country. The reader is directed to further reviews of
the education and nanotechnology (in general) research
activities in South Africa [6, 19, 26].
Moving forward, we believe the foundation laid is
sufficient to enable increased research outputs, and their
translation to the clinic, to benefit South Africans and
the global community. However, to accelerate progress,
the government and other stakeholders may need to con-
sider nanomedicine-specific program initiatives. Such
initiatives could include nanomedicine-specific funding
opportunities and development of nanomedicine centers
of excellence having a critical mass of experienced
researchers, postgraduate students, and requisite in-
house equipment. An example of such an approach can
be drawn from the current eight Nanomedicine Develop-
ment Centers in the US, funded by the National Institutes
of Health (https://commonfund.nih.gov/nanomedicine/
index). Postgraduate teaching and research programs
under such an initiative could focus more toward devel-
opmental/translational aspects of the technology.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
Figure 1: Nanomedicine publications emanating or including a South African institution up to December 2015. The source of the publica-
tions is PubMed, and publications were retrieved based on key words outlined in the text. ( ) indicates drug delivery articles, and ( )
indicates articles in the nanoparticle diagnostics space. No eligible research articles in nanoparticle-based diagnostics, on PubMed,
meeting the inclusion criteria were identified for 2015 and, therefore, are not shown.
A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa     343
Technical difficulties experienced in the nanomedicine
space in South Africa include limited intra-country col-
laboration and the absence of structured network chan-
nels between various institutions. One way to facilitate
collaboration and greater investment in the field is to
create an online interactive geographic map of nanotech-
nology activities in South Africa, such as the one pro-
duced in Germany (http://www.nano-map.de/). Such a
map can provide current information including research
and commercialization projects at the various universities
and science councils, nanotechnology infrastructure and
equipment available, and details of funding bodies and
industry partners. Enhanced coordination has obvious
benefits. A pitfall to avoid is the funding of a broad port-
folio of nanomedicine projects, as this may miss the req-
uisite concentration on important topics and research
questions needed to advance the national agenda [27].
Borrowing from global best practices, South Africa
could establish a technology platform to advance nano-
medicine, similar to European Technology Platform for
Nanomedicine (ETPN) (http://www.etp-nanomedicine.
eu/public). Such a platform could also be established at
continental level. With respect to the industry’s involve-
ment, it is not only an issue of resource support and
collaborative research, but it would be critical to also
ensure employment opportunities for the nanomedicine
graduates.
In summary, the future of nanomedicine in South
Africa looks bright given the foundation established by
the government, and with greater coordination, more
products are likely to be produced to the benefit of the
public.
References
[1] Wagner V, Dullaart A, Bock AK, Zweck A. The emerging nano-
medicine landscape. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1211–1217.
[2] Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC. Nanomedicine: current
status and future prospects. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 311–330.
[3] Chang EH, Harford JB, Eaton MA, Boisseau PM, Dube A, Hayeshi
R, Swai H, Lee DS. Nanomedicine: past, present and future – a
global perspective. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 468,
511–517.
[4] Bobo D, Robinson KJ, Islam J, Thurecht KJ, Corrie SR.
Nanoparticle-based medicines: a review of FDA-approved
materials and clinical trials to date. Pharma. Res. 2016, 33,
2373–2387.
[5] Cele LM, Ray SS, Coville NJ. Guest editorial: nanoscience
and nanotechnology in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2009, 105,
242–242.
[6] Nyokong T, Limson J. An education in progress. Nat. Nanotech-
nol. 2013, 8, 789–791.
[7] Maclurcan D. Nanotechnology and developing countries–part
2: what realities? Online J. Nanotechnol. 2005, 1, a0104.
[8] Hassan MHA. Small things and big changes in the developing
world. Science 2005, 309, 65–66.
[9] Alfeeli B, Al-Rawashdeh M, Bumajdad A, Al Lawati H, Abdelga-
wad M, Baccar ZM, Salem IB, Benaskar F. A review of nano-
technology development in the Arab World. Nanotechnol. Rev.
2013, 2, 359–377.
[10] Murray CJ, Ortblad KF, Guinovart C, Lim SS, Wolock TM, Roberts
DA, Dansereau EA, Graetz N, Barber RM, Brown JC, Wang
H, Duber HC, Naghavi M, Dicker D, Dandona L, Salomon JA,
Heuton KR, Foreman K, Phillips DE, Fleming TD, Flaxman AD,
Phillips BK, Johnson EK, Coggeshall MS, Abd-Allah F, Abera
SF, Abraham JP, Abubakar I, Abu-Raddad LJ, Abu-Rmeileh NM,
Achoki T, Adeyemo AO, Adou AK, Adsuar JC, Agardh EE, Akena D,
Al Kahbouri MJ, Alasfoor D, Albittar MI, Alcalá-Cerra G, Alegretti
MA, Alemu ZA, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Alhabib S, Ali R, Alla F,
Allen PJ, Alsharif U, Alvarez E, Alvis-Guzman N, Amankwaa AA,
Amare AT, Amini H, Ammar W, Anderson BO, Antonio CA, Anwari
P, Arnlöv J, Arsenijevic VS, Artaman A, Asghar RJ, Assadi R,
Atkins LS, Badawi A, Balakrishnan K, Banerjee A, Basu S, Beard-
sley J, Bekele T, Bell ML, Bernabe E, Beyene TJ, Bhala N, Bhalla
A, Bhutta ZA, Abdulhak AB, Binagwaho A, Blore JD, Basara
BB, Bose D, Brainin M, Breitborde N, Castañeda-Orjuela CA,
Catalá-López F, Chadha VK, Chang JC, Chiang PP, Chuang TW,
Colomar M, Cooper LT, Cooper C, Courville KJ, Cowie BC, Criqui
MH, Dandona R, Dayama A, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Del Pozo-
Cruz B, Deribe K, Des Jarlais DC, Dessalegn M, Dharmaratne
SD, Dilmen U, Ding EL, Driscoll TR, Durrani AM, Ellenbogen RG,
Ermakov SP, Esteghamati A, Faraon EJ, Farzadfar F, Fereshteh-
nejad SM, Fijabi DO, Forouzanfar MH, Fra Paleo U, Gaffikin L,
Gamkrelidze A, Gankpé FG, Geleijnse JM, Gessner BD, Gibney
KB, Ginawi IA, Glaser EL, Gona P, Goto A, Gouda HN, Gugnani
HC, Gupta R, Gupta R, Hafezi-Nejad N, Hamadeh RR, Ham-
mami M, Hankey GJ, Harb HL, Haro JM, Havmoeller R, Hay SI,
Hedayati MT, Pi IB, Hoek HW, Hornberger JC, Hosgood HD, Hotez
PJ, Hoy DG, Huang JJ, Iburg KM, Idrisov BT, Innos K, Jacobsen
KH, Jeemon P, Jensen PN, Jha V, Jiang G, Jonas JB, Juel K, Kan H,
Kankindi I, Karam NE, Karch A, Karema CK, Kaul A, Kawakami N,
Kazi DS, Kemp AH, Kengne AP, Keren A, Kereselidze M, Khader
YS, Khalifa SE, Khan EA, Khang YH, Khonelidze I, Kinfu Y, Kinge
JM, Knibbs L, Kokubo Y, Kosen S, Defo BK, Kulkarni VS, Kulkarni
C, Kumar K, Kumar RB, Kumar GA, Kwan GF, Lai T, Balaji AL,
Lam H, Lan Q, Lansingh VC, Larson HJ, Larsson A, Lee JT, Leigh
J, Leinsalu M, Leung R, Li Y, Li Y, De Lima GM, Lin HH, Lipshultz
SE, Liu S, Liu Y, Lloyd BK, Lotufo PA, Machado VM, Maclachlan
JH, Magis-Rodriguez C, Majdan M, Mapoma CC, Marcenes W,
Marzan MB, Masci JR, Mashal MT, Mason-Jones AJ, Mayosi
BM, Mazorodze TT, Mckay AC, Meaney PA, Mehndiratta MM,
Mejia-Rodriguez F, Melaku YA, Memish ZA, Mendoza W, Miller
TR, Mills EJ, Mohammad KA, Mokdad AH, Mola GL, Monasta
L, Montico M, Moore AR, Mori R, Moturi WN, Mukaigawara M,
Murthy KS, Naheed A, Naidoo KS, Naldi L, Nangia V, Narayan
KM, Nash D, Nejjari C, Nelson RG, Neupane SP, Newton CR, Ng
M, Nisar MI, Nolte S, Norheim OF, Nowaseb V, Nyakarahuka L,
Oh IH, Ohkubo T, Olusanya BO, Omer SB, Opio JN, Orisakwe
OE, Pandian JD, Papachristou C, Caicedo AJ, Patten SB, Paul VK,
Pavlin BI, Pearce N, Pereira DM, Pervaiz A, Pesudovs K, Petzold
M, Pourmalek F, Qato D, Quezada AD, Quistberg DA, Rafay A,
Rahimi K, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Ur Rahman S, Raju M, Rana SM,
344     A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa
Razavi H, Reilly RQ, Remuzzi G, Richardus JH, Ronfani L, Roy N,
Sabin N, Saeedi MY, Sahraian MA, Samonte GM, Sawhney M,
Schneider IJ, Schwebel DC, Seedat S, Sepanlou SG, Servan-Mori
EE, Sheikhbahaei S, Shibuya K, Shin HH, Shiue I, Shivakoti R,
Sigfusdottir ID, Silberberg DH, Silva AP, Simard EP, Singh JA,
Skirbekk V, Sliwa K, Soneji S, Soshnikov SS, Sreeramareddy
CT, Stathopoulou VK, Stroumpoulis K, Swaminathan S, Sykes
BL, Tabb KM, Talongwa RT, Tenkorang EY, Terkawi AS, Thomson
AJ, Thorne-Lyman AL, Towbin JA, Traebert J, Tran BX, Dimbuene
ZT, Tsilimbaris M, Uchendu US, Ukwaja KN, Uzun SB, Vallely
AJ, Vasankari TJ, Venketasubramanian N, Violante FS, Vlassov
VV, Vollset SE, Waller S, Wallin MT, Wang L, Wang X, Wang Y,
Weichenthal S, Weiderpass E, Weintraub RG, Westerman R,
White RA, Wilkinson JD, Williams TN, Woldeyohannes SM, Wong
JQ, Xu G, Yang YC, Yano Y, Yentur GK, Yip P, Yonemoto N, Yoon SJ,
Younis M, Yu C, Jin KY, El Sayed Zaki M, Zhao Y, Zheng Y, Zhou M,
Zhu J, Zou XN, Lopez AD, Vos T. Global, regional, and national
incidence and mortality for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria dur-
ing 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014, 384, 1005–1070.
[11] WHO. Health statistics and health information systems – Global
Health Estimates 2013 [cited 2016 19 September]; Available
from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/
estimates/en/index1.html.
[12] WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2016. [cited 2016 19Novem-
ber]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstr
eam/10665/250441/1/9789241565394-eng.pdf?ua=1.
[13] UNAIDS. Global AIDS Update. 2016 11November 2016]; Avail-
able from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/global-AIDS-
update-2016_en.pdf?ua=1.
[14] WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014.
[cited 2016 19November]. Available from: http://www.who.int/
nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/.
[15] Mabey D, Peeling RW, Ustianowski A, Perkins MD. Tropical
infectious diseases: Diagnostics for the developing world. Nat.
Rev. Micro. 2004, 2, 231–240.
[16] Gelperina S, Kisich K, Iseman MD, Heifets L. The potential
advantages of nanoparticle drug delivery systems in chemo-
therapy of tuberculosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005,
172, 1487–1490.
[17] Chen G, Roy I, Yang C, Prasad PN. Nanochemistry and nano-
medicine for nanoparticle-based diagnostics and therapy.
Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2826–2885.
[18] Wicki A, Witzigmann D, Balasubramanian V, Huwyler J. Nano-
medicine in cancer therapy: challenges, opportunities, and
clinical applications. J. Control. Release 2015, 200, 138–157.
[19] Augustine BH, Munro OQ, In to Africa: teaching nanoscience
to undergraduates in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. MRS Proc.
2011, 1320.
[20] Vorobiof DA, Rapoport BL, Mahomed R, Karime M. Phase II
study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with
metastatic malignant melanoma failing standard chemother-
apy treatment. Melanoma Res. 2003, 13, 201–203.
[21] Rapoport BL, Vorobiof DA, Slabber C, Alberts AS, Hlophe HS,
Mohammed C. Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxoru-
bicin and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive and
partially platinum-sensitive metastatic ovarian cancer. Int. J.
Gynecol. Cancer 2009, 19, 1137–1141.
[22] Du Toit LC, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Govender T, Carmichael TR. A
Drug Delivery Device. U.S. Patent US20140023692 A1, 2014.
[23] Tsai T, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Du Toit C. Polymeric Hydrogel
Compositions which Release Active Agents in Response to
Electrical Stimulus. U.S. Patent US20150313837 A1, 2015.
[24] Kalombo L. Nanoparticle Carriers for Drug Administration and
Process for Producing Same. U.S. Patent US8518450 B2, 2013.
[25] Fogel R, Limson J. Developing biosensors in developing coun-
tries: South Africa as a case study. Biosensors 2016, 6, 5.
[26] Pouris A. Nanoscale research in South Africa: a mapping exer-
cise based on scientometrics. Scientometrics 2007, 70, 541–553.
[27] Havel HA, Where are the nanodrugs? An industry perspective
on development of drug products containing nanomaterials.
AAPS J. 2016, 18, 1351–1353.
Bionotes
Admire Dube
Nanomedicine Research Group, School of
Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape,
Bellville, South Africa.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-6094
adube@uwc.ac.za
Admire Dube is a pharmaceutical scientist and Senior Lecturer in
Pharmaceutics at the School of Pharmacy, University of the Western
Cape (UWC) in Cape Town South Africa. He previously held a posi-
tion as Senior Researcher at the Council for Scientific and Industrial
Research in Pretoria South Africa where he was involved in commer-
cializing nanomedicines for malaria and tuberculosis treatment. At
UWC, his research group focuses on developing immune-modulatory
nanomedicines for treatment of infectious diseases. He holds a PhD
in Pharmaceutical Sciences from Monash University, Australia, and
Post-doctoral training in nanomedicine from the University at Buffalo,
USA. He has an interest in seeing Africa commercialize its first nano-
medicine, as well as enhancing pharmaceutical production in Africa.
Naushaad Ebrahim
Nanomedicine Research Group, School of
Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape,
Bellville, South Africa
Naushaad Ebrahim obtained his Bachelor of Pharmacy degree at
the University of the Western Cape (UWC), South Africa, and a PhD
at the same institution. He is a Pharmacist by training. Dr. Ebrahim
is currently a Senior lecturer in the Discipline of Pharmaceutics
and a Deputy Director at the School of Pharmacy at UWC, where he
has served as an academic for the last 15years. His research field
is in nanomedicine focusing on liposomal and phytosomal carrier
systems, which include the development of percutaneous absorp-
tion models for medicinal plants. Current projects he is involved
with include polymer coating of liposomes and phytosomal struc-
tures for increased drug delivery and stability.
... The country is emerging as one of the leaders in nanomedicine research and product development on the African continent (Mufamadi, 2019). In Africa, South Africa stands out as a country with better infrastructure for healthcare services and dedicated biomedical research, hence it is a significant player in nanomedicine research and product development on the continent (Dube and Ebrahim, 2017). The South African government has mobilized resources and investment towards the development of a critical mass of infrastructure, equipment, and human capital for the exploitation of nanotechnology (Dube and Ebrahim, 2017) and there is a need to assess the progress that the country has made so far. ...
... In Africa, South Africa stands out as a country with better infrastructure for healthcare services and dedicated biomedical research, hence it is a significant player in nanomedicine research and product development on the continent (Dube and Ebrahim, 2017). The South African government has mobilized resources and investment towards the development of a critical mass of infrastructure, equipment, and human capital for the exploitation of nanotechnology (Dube and Ebrahim, 2017) and there is a need to assess the progress that the country has made so far. Approaching nanotechnology from its broad context encompassing fields as diverse as energy storage, water purification and molecular engineering can be overwhelming, and it poses the risk of missing the finer details that emerge from an in-depth analysis. ...
... Manipulating materials at nanoscale through characterizing the molecular components inside cells at a level of precision is challenging and requires funding for procurement of the needed resources (McGoron, 2020). South Africa is one of the African countries that has made extensive investments toward creating a critical mass of infrastructure, equipment, and human capital for research in the application of nanomedicine (Dube and Ebrahim, 2017). The results of funding sources from the articles shows different funding streams. ...
Article
Full-text available
After nearly two decades of substantial investment in the field of nanomedicine within South Africa, this study undertakes an investigation into the specific diseases that have been targeted for research and development, as well as the key actors and collaborative networks involved in this burgeoning field. To accomplish this, the study adopts a mixed-method approach, combining bibliometric and scientometric techniques alongside a comprehensive review of existing literature. The study’s findings illuminate that the diseases selected for emphasis in nanomedicine research closely align with the prevalent health challenges faced by South Africa. Notably, these ailments encompass cancer, bacterial infections, and tuberculosis, all of which significantly contribute to the country’s disease burden. Furthermore, the investigation highlights that research-intensive South African universities play a pivotal role as the primary actors in advancing nanomedicine initiatives. Over time, collaborative endeavors among these key actors have seen a noteworthy upswing. These collaborations have fostered robust connections between South African institutions and counterparts in Asian nations and the Middle East. It is worth emphasizing that nanomedicine is a resource-intensive field, necessitating substantial capital investment. Collaborative initiatives have, in turn, granted access to critical infrastructure and materials that would have otherwise been beyond the reach of some participating entities. Remarkably, these collaborative partnerships have not only facilitated scientific progress but have also cultivated social capital and trust among involved stakeholders. These valuable intangible assets hold great potential as South Africa advances towards more exploitative phases of technology development within the domain of nanomedicine. Moreover, South Africa is strategically positioning itself to cultivate a critical mass of expertise in nanomedicine, recognising the significance of skilled human resources in harnessing the full potential of this technology in the future. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6173875/
... Nanotechnology, defined as the science of designing, producing, and the application of materials at a nanometre scale, is one of the most exciting and fast-moving areas of science that may revolutionize many aspects of life [1]. This discipline has galvanized researchers worldwide and has contributed to the development of novel products for applications in the health, energy, food, agriculture, and water sectors [2]. In order to harness the benefits of nanotechnology, the SA government has, over the past 16 years, made extensive investments toward creating a critical mass of infrastructure, equipment, and human capital for nanotechnology research [1][2][3]. ...
... This discipline has galvanized researchers worldwide and has contributed to the development of novel products for applications in the health, energy, food, agriculture, and water sectors [2]. In order to harness the benefits of nanotechnology, the SA government has, over the past 16 years, made extensive investments toward creating a critical mass of infrastructure, equipment, and human capital for nanotechnology research [1][2][3]. However, despite the great efforts made over the past decade, the promise of nanotechnology to bring many scientific breakthroughs with meaningful impacts to the SA bio-economy has not been met [4]. ...
... As experts in this area, the BRN recently published an extensive review of the three PHB-targeting strategies for the treatment of obesity [7]. These three nanotechnology-based strategies showed exciting outcomes by (1) inhibiting angiogenesis in the WAT vasculature of obese rodents [24,27], (2) browning of WATs [15,29], and (3) the induction of photothermal lipolysis of WATs using gold nanorods (AuNRs) and gold nanospheres (AuNSs) [16]. This is exciting because the nanotechnology-based strategies, which are well established in cancer treatment, also present the possibility of their use in the reversal of obesity [7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Nanotechnology has recently received much interest in various fields, including medicine. South Africa (SA) was the first country in Africa to adopt the technology with the aim of enhancing the national bio-economy and global competitiveness by using innovative nanotechnology-based solutions. Since its inception in 2005 in SA, researchers have seized opportunities to increase and develop niche areas for its application in the health, energy, food, agriculture, and water sectors. We ventured into this field and have performed pioneering work on nanotechnology-based treatment strategies over the years. This perspective highlights the journey, with associated successes over the years, in order to display the impact of our nanotechnology research in health. The focus is on the nanotechnology outputs that have emanated from the Department of Science and Innovation (DSI)/Mintek Nanotechnology Innovation Centre (NIC) Biolabels Research Node (BRN) at the University of the Western Cape (UWC). BRN’s research interests were on nano-enabled materials for developing therapeutic agents, photothermal sensitizers, and targeted drug-delivery systems for treatment of chronic diseases and antimicrobial resistance.
... 15 Mintek is a successful nano-based company in South Africa that has produced and marketed gold, nanospheres, and nanorods, including polyethylene glycol coated gold nanoparticles and polyethylene glycol-biotin gold nanoparticles, to the research community and industry. 16 To date, Nigeria is yet to develop a nanotechnology standard or have a patent on nanotechnology issued by the US Patent and Trademark Office. ...
... In contrast, South African researchers have used nanotechnology to reach milestones in nanomedicine, sensors, magnetism, catalysis, phosphors and optics, electronics, energy, nanobiotechnology, water research and communicable diseases. 16,17 Unlike Nigeria which lacks specific budget for nanotechnology, South Africa invested about USD77.5 million on nanotechnology R&D between 2005 and 2012 18 and additionally committed USD28.6 million to her national nanotechnology equipment programme to support nanotechnology infrastructure as of 2015 19 , thereby laying a very solid foundation for the country in the pursuit of nanotechnology enterprise by universities, research councils and even private entities. ...
Article
Full-text available
Reasons for the slow pace of nanotechnology research in Nigeria, Africa's most populous country, are explored, given Nigeria's huge human and natural endowments, and solutions are proffered to address the seemingly lagging outlook of the country in nanotechnology. This Commentary is relevant to all critical stakeholders at national, regional and international levels to mobilise efforts to advance the course of nanotechnology in Nigeria and beyond. This Commentary was born of the author's experience as a leading researcher in nanobiotechnology in Nigeria, having published more than 70 articles on nanotechnology since 2015, a textbook titled Microbial Nanobiotechnology: Principles and Applications, and as head of a multidisciplinary nanotechnology research group in Nigeria. The Commentary draws on several types of data on nanotechnology R&D in Nigeria including demographic, economic (GDP and budgetary allocation) and scientometric.
... The year 2020, saw heightened research into developing drugs and vaccines for COVID-19, and this included the application of nanoparticles, with some formulations reaching clinical trials (Chan, 2020;ClinicalTrials.Gov, n.d.;. There are significant ongoing infectious disease drug development (Nordling, 2013) and nanomedicine research activities occurring on the African continent (Dube and Ebrahim, 2017;Saidi et al., 2018). Researchers in Africa are key in infectious disease research as the continent bears the greatest burden of infectious diseases, and researchers also have access to patient populations for clinical studies. ...
... The situation in Nigeria is a sharp contrast to what is obtainable in South Africa, where the government has committed $77.5 million to nanotechnology R&D between 2005 and 2012 (Shen et al. 2021), whereas Nigeria has no budget headline for nanotechnology. The national nanotechnology equipment program (NNEP) in South Africa supported nanotechnology infrastructure by over $28.6 million before it was ended in 2015 (Dube and Ebrahim 2017). Certainly, the foundation laid by South Africa in nanotechnology research starting from 2005 is responsible for the leading roles the country plays in nanotechnology R&D in Africa. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this study, we present findings on the engagement of Nigerian scholars in nanotechnology research between 2010 and 2020 using primary data that were obtained from Scopus. The data were processed to unravel the productivity of the top scholars in relation to the top counterparts in Egypt and South Africa, Africa and the world in the field of nanotechnology. Similarly, the contributions of different universities were analyzed, while we also studied the extent of collaboration, funding pattern of nanotechnology research, outlet of publications of articles, and the influence of webometric ranking among others. The data were analyzed using Euclidean dissimilarity coefficients with hierarchical cluster analysis, and corresponding dendrograms of relationships were plotted. The results showed that although Nigeria is the fourth nation in nanotechnology research in Africa, her performance is low compared to Egypt and South Africa, as the nation recorded only 645 articles during the period, representing 11.85 and 24.84% of the output of Egypt and South Africa, respectively. Using hierarchical clustering techniques, the top researchers in Nigeria were identified (Ezema, FI, UNN and Lateef, A, LAUTECH) that contributed 12.09% of the publications, while engineering, physics/astronomy, and materials science dominated the range of publications. South Africa and Malaysia clustered as the most collaborative nation with Nigeria on nanotechnology (51.10%). The most productive universities in nanotechnology were UNN, COVENANT, and LAUTECH by contributing 33.12% of the publications, while other institutions were not significantly different in their low productivities. The national funding of nanotechnology research was low with just 6.51% of the works funded through local initiatives, and 52.44% of the works not supported by any fund. The remaining 41.05% received funds from foreign institutions. The outcome of this study is a performance evaluation of Nigeria in nanotechnology R&D that requires concerted efforts by the critical stakeholders to mobilize actions for the country to realize her full potentials in the field. Suggestions have been made on how to improve the performance of the country towards 2030. This pioneering effort at situating the Nigeria’s status in nanotechnology will be of assistance to the educationists, technocrats, and policy makers in making right decisions on the way forward for Nigeria.
Chapter
Nanotechnology facilitates the production of advanced materials and systems with distinct properties that contribute significantly to achieving sustainable global development. It has a profound impact on virtually every single nation of the world and thus has emerged universally in both developed and developing nations. But, the extent of access to technical infrastructure, investments, scientific set-ups, and finances varies significantly between these nations, creating a divide, which is a critical issue. Though developing nations lag significantly behind in terms of accessibility and progress to developed nations, there is increasing evidence that emerging nanotechnology research and development (R&D) holds considerable promise for these developing nations. This assists in bridging the digital divide. South Africa is one of the pioneering nations from the global South that has actively embraced nanotechnology intending to enhance global competitiveness and promote sustainable economic growth. This chapter outlines how nanotechnology can considerably address the prevailing challenges faced by developing nations and proclaims how these nations could expand their economy by embracing nanotechnology with innovation and research. Thus, efforts have to be taken to make emerging nanotechnology an integral component of the lives of the people in developing and developed nations, bridging the digital gap, and making an unpolarized world.
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, the addition of nanometer materials to concrete materials has attracted a group of increasing number of scholars’ research interests, and nano-SiO 2 is one of the research hotspots. In this paper, we briefly introduce the influence of nano-SiO 2 on setting time, slump, shrinkage, durability and mechanical properties of concrete. In addition, this review also includes the microstructure measured by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the content of various hydration products obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The result shows that the setting time of nano-SiO 2 concrete is shortened, the slump is reduced and the shrinkage is improved owing to the high activity and nucleation of nano-SiO 2 . The improvement effect of nano-SiO 2 on concrete is remarkable, especially in the aspect of enhancing the durability of concrete. It should be noted that nano-SiO 2 shows limited improvement in the mechanical properties of concrete. In the end, this literature summary explains the macro performance of nano-silica modified concrete through microstructure.
Chapter
With nanomedicines increasing in market value and disruptive potential, a rapidly moving field such as this will require engaging in the difficult task of responsible management and the development of appropriate guidelines, which falls into the jurisdiction of governmental agencies. While each is influenced by the countries politics and demands of the people, there are shared goals of improving market success, risk assessment, and safety optimization. In this chapter, we describe the regulatory landscape with regards to nanomedicines in various countries. We first start with the world’s nanotechnological leaders in North America, the European Union, and Asian and then discuss the notable strides taken by emerging countries where nanomedicines have caught the public eye.
Article
Full-text available
In this review we provide an up to date snapshot of nanomedicines either currently approved by the US FDA, or in the FDA clinical trials process. We define nanomedicines as therapeutic or imaging agents which comprise a nanoparticle in order to control the biodistribution, enhance the efficacy, or otherwise reduce toxicity of a drug or biologic. We identified 51 FDA-approved nanomedicines that met this definition and 77 products in clinical trials, with ~40% of trials listed in clinicaltrials.gov started in 2014 or 2015. While FDA approved materials are heavily weighted to polymeric, liposomal, and nanocrystal formulations, there is a trend towards the development of more complex materials comprising micelles, protein-based NPs, and also the emergence of a variety of inorganic and metallic particles in clinical trials. We then provide an overview of the different material categories represented in our search, highlighting nanomedicines that have either been recently approved, or are already in clinical trials. We conclude with some comments on future perspectives for nanomedicines, which we expect to include more actively-targeted materials, multi-functional materials (“theranostics”) and more complicated materials that blur the boundaries of traditional material categories. A key challenge for researchers, industry, and regulators is how to classify new materials and what additional testing (e.g. safety and toxicity) is required before products become available.
Patent
Full-text available
The invention provides a process for the production of nanoparticle carriers for drug delivery, said nanoparticles being produced by preparing a double emulsion of water-oil-water including one or more polymer which forms the basis of the nanoparticle carrier, blending the drug to be delivered into one of the emulsion phases, doping either the oil-phase or the outer-water phase with a carbohydrate, and spray drying the emulsion to form nanoparticles of a narrow particle size distribution of 100 nm to 1000 nm, which nanoparticles are substantially spherical.
Article
Full-text available
A mini-review of the reported biosensor research occurring in South Africa evidences a strong emphasis on electrochemical sensor research, guided by the opportunities this transduction platform holds for low-cost and robust sensing of numerous targets. Many of the reported publications centre on fundamental research into the signal transduction method, using model biorecognition elements, in line with international trends. Other research in this field is spread across several areas including: the application of nanotechnology; the identification and validation of biomarkers; development and testing of biorecognition agents (antibodies and aptamers) and design of electro-catalysts, most notably metallophthalocyanine. Biosensor targets commonly featured were pesticides and metals. Areas of regional import to sub-Saharan Africa, such as HIV/AIDs and tuberculosis diagnosis, are also apparent in a review of the available literature. Irrespective of the targets, the challenge to the effective deployment of such sensors remains shaped by social and economic realities such that the requirements thereof are for low-cost and universally easy to operate devices for field settings. While it is difficult to disentangle the intertwined roles of national policy, grant funding availability and, certainly, of global trends in shaping areas of emphasis in research, most notable is the strong role that nanotechnology, and to a certain extent biotechnology, plays in research regarding biosensor construction. Stronger emphasis on collaboration between scientists in theoretical modelling, nanomaterials application and or relevant stakeholders in the specific field (e.g., food or health monitoring) and researchers in biosensor design may help evolve focused research efforts towards development and deployment of low-cost biosensors.
Article
Full-text available
Nanomedicine is an emerging and rapidly evolving field and includes the use of nanoparticles for diagnosis and therapy of a variety of diseases, as well as in regenerative medicine. In this mini-review, leaders in the field from around the globe provide a personal perspective on the development of nanomedicine. The focus lies on the translation from research to development and the innovation supply chain, as well as the current status of nanomedicine in industry. The role of academic professional societies and the importance of government funding are discussed. Nanomedicine to combat infectious diseases of poverty is highlighted along with other pertinent examples of recent breakthroughs in nanomedicine. Taken together, this review provides a unique and global perspective on the emerging field of nanomedicine.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The Millennium Declaration in 2000 brought special global attention to HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria through the formulation of Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 6. The Global Burden of Disease 2013 study provides a consistent and comprehensive approach to disease estimation for between 1990 and 2013, and an opportunity to assess whether accelerated progress has occured since the Millennium Declaration. Methods: To estimate incidence and mortality for HIV, we used the UNAIDS Spectrum model appropriately modified based on a systematic review of available studies of mortality with and without antiretroviral therapy (ART). For concentrated epidemics, we calibrated Spectrum models to fit vital registration data corrected for misclassification of HIV deaths. In generalised epidemics, we minimised a loss function to select epidemic curves most consistent with prevalence data and demographic data for all-cause mortality. We analysed counterfactual scenarios for HIV to assess years of life saved through prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) and ART. For tuberculosis, we analysed vital registration and verbal autopsy data to estimate mortality using cause of death ensemble modelling. We analysed data for corrected case-notifications, expert opinions on the case-detection rate, prevalence surveys, and estimated cause-specific mortality using Bayesian meta-regression to generate consistent trends in all parameters. We analysed malaria mortality and incidence using an updated cause of death database, a systematic analysis of verbal autopsy validation studies for malaria, and recent studies (2010—13) of incidence, drug resistance, and coverage of insecticide-treated bednets. Findings: Globally in 2013, there were 1·8 million new HIV infections (95% uncertainty interval 1·7 million to 2·1 million), 29·2 million prevalent HIV cases (28·1 to 31·7), and 1·3 million HIV deaths (1·3 to 1·5). At the peak of the epidemic in 2005, HIV caused 1·7 million deaths (1·6 million to 1·9 million). Concentrated epidemics in Latin America and eastern Europe are substantially smaller than previously estimated. Through interventions including PMTCT and ART, 19·1 million life-years (16·6 million to 21·5 million) have been saved, 70·3% (65·4 to 76·1) in developing countries. From 2000 to 2011, the ratio of development assistance for health for HIV to years of life saved through intervention was US$4498 in developing countries. Including in HIV-positive individuals, all-form tuberculosis incidence was 7·5 million (7·4 million to 7·7 million), prevalence was 11·9 million (11·6 million to 12·2 million), and number of deaths was 1·4 million (1·3 million to 1·5 million) in 2013. In the same year and in only individuals who were HIV-negative, all-form tuberculosis incidence was 7·1 million (6·9 million to 7·3 million), prevalence was 11·2 million (10·8 million to 11·6 million), and number of deaths was 1·3 million (1·2 million to 1·4 million). Annualised rates of change (ARC) for incidence, prevalence, and death became negative after 2000. Tuberculosis in HIV-negative individuals disproportionately occurs in men and boys (versus women and girls); 64·0% of cases (63·6 to 64·3) and 64·7% of deaths (60·8 to 70·3). Globally, malaria cases and deaths grew rapidly from 1990 reaching a peak of 232 million cases (143 million to 387 million) in 2003 and 1·2 million deaths (1·1 million to 1·4 million) in 2004. Since 2004, child deaths from malaria in sub-Saharan Africa have decreased by 31·5% (15·7 to 44·1). Outside of Africa, malaria mortality has been steadily decreasing since 1990. Interpretation: Our estimates of the number of people living with HIV are 18·7% smaller than UNAIDS's estimates in 2012. The number of people living with malaria is larger than estimated by WHO. The number of people living with HIV, tuberculosis, or malaria have all decreased since 2000. At the global level, upward trends for malaria and HIV deaths have been reversed and declines in tuberculosis deaths have accelerated. 101 countries (74 of which are developing) still have increasing HIV incidence. Substantial progress since the Millennium Declaration is an encouraging sign of the effect of global action.
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, South Africa has, like other countries, increased investment in nanotechnology research, which in turn has had an effect on the curricula of its higher-education institutions. However, the focus of these changes, and the approach taken to achieve them, are unique to the circumstances of the country.
Article
A global survey of companies pursuing 'nanomedicine' indicates that nanotechnology is taking root in the drug and medical device industry.
Article
While nanotechnology advancements have been applied to pharmaceutical products, the number of approved nanodrugs by global health authorities has not kept pace with research and development investments in the field. This article reviews the history of nanodrug development and provides an industrial context for realistic expectations in the future.
Article
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Currently available therapies are inadequate and spur demand for improved technologies. Rapid growth in nanotechnology towards the development of nanomedicine products holds great promise to improve therapeutic strategies against cancer. Nanomedicine products represent an opportunity to achieve sophisticated targeting strategies and multi-functionality. They can improve the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of conventional therapeutics and may thus optimize the efficacy of existing anti-cancer compounds. In this review, we discuss state-of-the-art nanoparticles and targeted systems that have been investigated in clinical studies. We emphasize the challenges faced in using nanomedicine products and translating them from experimental conditions to the clinical setting. Additionally, we cover aspects of nanocarrier engineering that may open up new opportunities for nanomedicine products in the clinic. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.