Access to this full-text is provided by De Gruyter.
Content available from Nanotechnology Reviews
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Nanotechnol Rev 2017; 6(4): 339–344
Nanotechnology Institutions contribution
Admire Dube* and Naushaad Ebrahim
The nanomedicine landscape of South Africa
DOI 10.1515/ntrev-2016-0108
Received December 11, 2016; accepted February 14, 2017; previously
published online March 20, 2017
Abstract: Nanomedicine is one of the most exciting appli-
cations of nanotechnology and promises to address sev-
eral of mankind’s healthcare needs. South Africa is one
of the countries engaged in nanomedicine research and
product development on the African continent. In this
article, we provide a top-level description of the policy,
infrastructure, and human capital development programs
supported by the South African government. We also high-
light the nanomedicine outputs (publications, patents,
and products) that have emanated from South Africa. This
description of a “newly industrialized” country engage-
ment in nanomedicine is important within the global con-
text of nanomedicine development.
Keywords: nanomedicine; nanoparticle drug delivery;
nanotechnology in South Africa; nanotechnology policy.
1 Introduction
Nanotechnology is recognized as one of the most important
scientific fields of the 21st century. Nanotechnology is the
application of engineered structures in the nanometer-scale
size range (often 100nm or smaller, but also 1–1000nm),
which possess desirable properties, e.g. magnetic, optical,
biochemical, or electronic properties, and are generally
applied to the benefit of mankind. Nanomedicine is the
application of nanotechnology in the field of health and
has demonstrated capability to improve the diagnosis and
treatment of diseases by providing novel disease biosen-
sors and improved drug delivery [1, 2]. Nanomedicine is
a multi-disciplinary field, encompassing pharmaceutical
and biomedical sciences, medicine, and physical sciences,
and is a field of intense global research and product devel-
opment [3]. To illustrate the extensive ongoing product
development, a study by Bobo et al. reported that there
are currently 51 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-
approved nanomedicines, 77 products undergoing clinical
trials, and approximately 40% of clinical trials were listed
in the clinicaltrials.gov database in 2014 or 2015 [4].
On the African continent, South Africa is one of the
countries engaged in nanomedicine research and product
development. South Africa is part of the five major emerg-
ing economies or newly industrialized countries, together
with Brazil, Russia, India, and China. The South African
government has made extensive investment toward creat-
ing a critical mass of infrastructure, equipment, and human
capital for nanotechnology research [5, 6]. In this article, we
provide a top-level overview of the nanotechnology policy,
funding, equipment, and human capital development pro-
grams supported by the South African government. We also
highlight the nanomedicine outputs (publications, patents,
and products) that have emanated from South Africa. This
description of a “newly industrialized” country engagement
in nanomedicine is important within the global context of
nanomedicine development [7–9]. Finally, we provide our
opinion of future strategies to leverage existing framework
and investment to support translation of nanomedicine
research findings for commercial and public benefit.
2 The South African disease
landscape
To contextualize nanomedicine research in South Africa,
it is important to describe the disease landscape. Africa,
in particular Sub-Saharan Africa, is disproportionately
challenged by a burden of infectious diseases (IDs)
including tuberculosis (TB) and HIV/AIDS, which nega-
tively impact its economy and the quality of life of African
people [10, 11]. The burden of TB in South Africa is among
the highest in the world. Total TB incidence (TB alone
plus TB-HIV co-infection) in South Africa is estimated to
be 834 per 100,000 population; and the mortality rate
is unacceptably high at 133 per 100,000 population [12].
TB that is resistant to existing drug therapies, i.e. multi-
drug resistant TB, is on the rise globally, more so in South
Africa, which is ranked among the high burden countries
[12]. A large number of people are living with HIV in South
*Corresponding author: Admire Dube, Nanomedicine Research
Group, School of Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape,
Bellville, South Africa, e-mail: adube@uwc.ac.za.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-6094
Naushaad Ebrahim: Nanomedicine Research Group, School of
Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa
340 A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa
Africa, and the country has the largest number of people
on treatment in the world (approximately 3.4 million
people on treatment) [13].
In recent times, a new threat has emerged in the form
of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), i.e. cardiovascu-
lar disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and dia-
betes. In Africa, the probability of a person dying from one
of the four main NCDs (in persons aged between 30 and
70years) is over 20%, among the highest in the world [14].
Mortality due to NCDs is also high in South Africa [14].
Despite technological advances in medical diagno-
sis and treatment, deaths due to IDs and NCDs are still
common. Among the current requirements to mitigate
deaths is the need for more simple, inexpensive, rapid,
and sensitive point-of-care diagnostic tools, and drug
therapies providing uncomplicated treatment regimens
(e.g. short-duration oral treatments, once daily to weekly
dosing intervals) reduced toxicity and side effects [15, 16].
Nanomedicine has the potential to provide solutions to
these needs, enabling improved disease detection and
delivery of drugs. The reader is directed to some reviews
on the application of nanoparticles in diagnostics and
drug delivery [17, 18]. It is against the backdrop of disease
burden and the promise of nanomedicine that research-
ers in South Africa, with the support of the government,
have embarked in research and product development in
this field.
3 South African nanotechnology
policy and funding framework
National strategic leadership in nanotechnology is pro-
vided by the Department of Science and Technology (DST)
(www.dst.gov.za) and is described in National Nanotech-
nology Strategy (NNS) (http://www.gov.za/documents/
national-nanotechnology-strategy) published in 2005.
The publication of this strategy essentially heralded the
start of public funding in nanotechnology, with an invest-
ment of ZAR170million (approximately USD 12.2million at
an exchange rate of 1 USD = 14 ZAR) over the first 3years.
The NNS is aligned to the broad development goals of
South Africa and compliments other national strategies,
in particular, the Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Strategy, as well as the Biotechnology Strategy and the
Skills Development Strategy. The strategy emphasizes
nanotechnology research and development, i.e. mate-
rial synthesis, characterization, and fabrication. Health
(nanomedicine) is among the focus areas of the strategy.
The key initiatives of the NNS include establishment and
support of nanoscience characterization centers, funding
for research, and human resource development. Com-
plementary to the NNS is the Nanoscience and Nano-
technology 10-year Research Plan (http://www.gov.za/
documents/nanoscience-and-nanotechnology-10-year-
research-plan), which was released by the DST in 2010,
whose main purpose is to focus national research efforts
to deliver on the goals of the NNS. Key research ques-
tions within the nanomedicine scope of the research plan
include development of nanotechnology-based rapid,
simple, and user-friendly point-of-care diagnostic kits
for HIV and TB, nano-biosensors for in situ detection of
glucose levels, and the development of nanoparticle-
based drug delivery systems for TB treatment.
4 National nanotechnology
infrastructure
Public funding has facilitated the acquisition of nano-
technology-specific equipment for various research
councils and universities, through the National Nano-
technology Equipment Programme (NNEP) (http://hicd.
nrf.ac.za/?q=node/19). The NNEP was a specific funding
instrument as part of the implementation of the NNS,
intended to acquire, upgrade, or develop research equip-
ment for the analysis and characterization of nanoma-
terials in South Africa. The NNEP ended in 2015, after a
10-year investment and over ZAR400 million (over USD
28.6 million using an exchange rate of 1 USD = 14 ZAR)
invested. This amount excludes funding provided by
other equipment programs, e.g. the National Equipment
Program, which also provide for purchase of equipment
used for nanotechnology research. Table 1 summarizes
the key national facilities for nanotechnology research in
South Africa and some of the equipment and instruments
available at the facilities.
5 Human capital development
By and large, nanotechnology education (including
nanomedicine) is provided at postgraduate level [6, 19].
The flagship program in nanoscience and nanotechnol-
ogy education is the DST-funded 2-year Master’s degree
program leading to an MSc Nanoscience qualification.
This program is offered through collaboration between
the University of the Western Cape (the program-manag-
ing institution), University of Johannesburg, University
A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa 341
of the Free State, and Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Uni-
versity. Students undergo 9 months of didactic learning,
followed with a research project completed at any one of
the participating universities, under the stream of either
nanochemistry, nanophysics, or nanomedicine. In 2006,
the DST and the National Research Foundation (NRF)
established the South African Research Chairs Initiative
(SARChi) (http://www.nrf.ac.za/division/rcce/instru-
ments/research-chairs). The major expectation of SARChi
grant recipients is the production of high-quality post-
graduate students and research and innovation outputs.
To date, there are seven research chairs in nanotechnol-
ogy (with at least one chair focusing on nanomedicine).
6 Nanomedicine research in South
Africa
6.1 Drug delivery
We performed a review of publications emanating from
South Africa in the field of nanomedicine. We conducted
a search on PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed) using a Boolean search string, which included
the keywords nanoparticle or liposome, drug, protein and
gene delivery, and included an author/co-author based
at a South African institution. PubMed was selected as it
is one of the largest archives of biomedical literature and
also conducts a review of scientific quality of journals
prior to indexing. Therefore, we have some indication of
the level of quality of the publications captured by our
search.
We retrieved 137 eligible articles (published up to
December 2015), with the earliest article published in 1991.
Analysis of the number of articles per year is shown in
Figure 1. In the past decade, a surge in nanoparticle drug
delivery publications has been observed. This trend could
be related to the availability of nanotechnology funding
through the NNS and the NNEP. Of the articles published
during this period, 46% was in the ID space, with the
rest being related to NCDs, or not focused to a particular
disease, e.g. general nanomedicine reviews. This statistic
reflects the balance of the disease landscape in Africa.
All articles retrieved were preclinical studies, except for
two clinical studies, although it should be noted that
these clinical studies involved evaluation of the efficacy
and safety of commercially available nanomedicine prod-
ucts and were not a clinical evaluation of nanomedicines
developed by the researchers [20, 21].
Publications emanated primarily from 14higher edu-
cation institutions and science councils, i.e. the Univer-
sity of KwaZulu-Natal, University of the Witwatersrand,
Stellenbosch University, CSIR, University of Pretoria, Uni-
versity of Cape Town, Rhodes University, University of the
Western Cape, Tshwane University of Technology, North-
West University, University of Zululand, Nelson Mandela
Metropolitan University, South African Nuclear Energy
Corporation, and MINTEK. Higher education institutions
Table 1: List of the key national nanotechnology facilities in South Africa.
Facility name and location Equipment
Centre for Nanotechnology Innovation
Rhodes University, Grahamstown
https://www.ru.ac.za/nanotechnology/equipment/
TOF-SIMS
Microscopy Centre for High Resolution Transmission Electron
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth
http://chrtem.nmmu.ac.za/
ARM-TEM, STEM, FIB-SEM, AFM and nanoindenter
National Centre for Nano-Structured Materials
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth
http://chrtem.nmmu.ac.za/
FIB-SEM, small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering, AFM, TEM, SEM
National Cleanroom Facility
DST-Mintek Nanotechnology Innovation Centre (NIC)a, Pretoria
http://www.nic.ac.za/
Clean room, TEM, SEM, AFM
Selected key pieces of equipment available at a facility are listed.
ARM, atomic resolution microscope; SEM, scanning electron microscope; TEM, transmission electronic microscope; STEM, scan-
ning transmission electron microscopy; FIB, focused ion beam; AFM, atomic force microscope; TOF-SIMS, time of flight-secondary-ion
mass-spectrometer.
aNIC composed of research nodes located at three universities, i.e. Rhodes University (focused on the development of sensor technologies),
the University of the Western Cape on bio-labeling and drug delivery and the University of Johannesburg (focused on water treatment).
342 A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa
and science councils are also the focus of the NNS. We
retrieved three patents that relate to nanoparticle drug
delivery systems [22–24] by applying similar search cri-
teria (as used in PubMed) using the search site Google
patents.
It is notable that MINTEK has commercialized its
research outputs and markets gold, nanospheres, and
nanorods, including polyethylene glycol (PEG)-gold
nanoparticles and PEG-Biotin-gold nanoparticles to the
research community and industry (http://www.nic.ac.za/
products.html).
6.2 Diagnostics
We performed a search on PubMed of articles reporting
research into diagnostics for diseases, which incorporate
nanoparticles. Fogel and Limson performed an excellent
review of general biosensor research in South Africa [25],
and the reader is also directed to this review. Our search
string included the words surface plasmon resonance,
lateral flow, sensors, biosensors and cantilever/nano-
cantilever, disease, as applied by Wagner etal. [1]. The
search resulted in 15 articles meeting the criteria. Most
articles were published in 2014 (6) (Figure 1) with the first
PubMed-identified article published in 2007. An equal
distribution of publications was found when comparing
research for IDs versus NCDs (7), with one article includ-
ing both. These publications emanated mainly from six
academic institutions and science councils, namely, Uni-
versity of Johannesburg, University of Pretoria, University
of the Western Cape, University of the Free State, Univer-
sity of the Witwatersrand and Nanotechnology Innovation
Centre, Advanced Materials Division, MINTEKAt this time,
no research outputs have been commercialized.
7 Concluding remarks
Over the past 10years, the South African government has
laid a strong foundation for research and product devel-
opment in nanotechnology, establishing policy frame-
work and making significant investments in equipment
and infrastructure, research funding, and human capital
development at universities and science councils through-
out the country. The reader is directed to further reviews of
the education and nanotechnology (in general) research
activities in South Africa [6, 19, 26].
Moving forward, we believe the foundation laid is
sufficient to enable increased research outputs, and their
translation to the clinic, to benefit South Africans and
the global community. However, to accelerate progress,
the government and other stakeholders may need to con-
sider nanomedicine-specific program initiatives. Such
initiatives could include nanomedicine-specific funding
opportunities and development of nanomedicine centers
of excellence having a critical mass of experienced
researchers, postgraduate students, and requisite in-
house equipment. An example of such an approach can
be drawn from the current eight Nanomedicine Develop-
ment Centers in the US, funded by the National Institutes
of Health (https://commonfund.nih.gov/nanomedicine/
index). Postgraduate teaching and research programs
under such an initiative could focus more toward devel-
opmental/translational aspects of the technology.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
Figure 1: Nanomedicine publications emanating or including a South African institution up to December 2015. The source of the publica-
tions is PubMed, and publications were retrieved based on key words outlined in the text. ( ) indicates drug delivery articles, and ( )
indicates articles in the nanoparticle diagnostics space. No eligible research articles in nanoparticle-based diagnostics, on PubMed,
meeting the inclusion criteria were identified for 2015 and, therefore, are not shown.
A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa 343
Technical difficulties experienced in the nanomedicine
space in South Africa include limited intra-country col-
laboration and the absence of structured network chan-
nels between various institutions. One way to facilitate
collaboration and greater investment in the field is to
create an online interactive geographic map of nanotech-
nology activities in South Africa, such as the one pro-
duced in Germany (http://www.nano-map.de/). Such a
map can provide current information including research
and commercialization projects at the various universities
and science councils, nanotechnology infrastructure and
equipment available, and details of funding bodies and
industry partners. Enhanced coordination has obvious
benefits. A pitfall to avoid is the funding of a broad port-
folio of nanomedicine projects, as this may miss the req-
uisite concentration on important topics and research
questions needed to advance the national agenda [27].
Borrowing from global best practices, South Africa
could establish a technology platform to advance nano-
medicine, similar to European Technology Platform for
Nanomedicine (ETPN) (http://www.etp-nanomedicine.
eu/public). Such a platform could also be established at
continental level. With respect to the industry’s involve-
ment, it is not only an issue of resource support and
collaborative research, but it would be critical to also
ensure employment opportunities for the nanomedicine
graduates.
In summary, the future of nanomedicine in South
Africa looks bright given the foundation established by
the government, and with greater coordination, more
products are likely to be produced to the benefit of the
public.
References
[1] Wagner V, Dullaart A, Bock AK, Zweck A. The emerging nano-
medicine landscape. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1211–1217.
[2] Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC. Nanomedicine: current
status and future prospects. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 311–330.
[3] Chang EH, Harford JB, Eaton MA, Boisseau PM, Dube A, Hayeshi
R, Swai H, Lee DS. Nanomedicine: past, present and future – a
global perspective. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 468,
511–517.
[4] Bobo D, Robinson KJ, Islam J, Thurecht KJ, Corrie SR.
Nanoparticle-based medicines: a review of FDA-approved
materials and clinical trials to date. Pharma. Res. 2016, 33,
2373–2387.
[5] Cele LM, Ray SS, Coville NJ. Guest editorial: nanoscience
and nanotechnology in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2009, 105,
242–242.
[6] Nyokong T, Limson J. An education in progress. Nat. Nanotech-
nol. 2013, 8, 789–791.
[7] Maclurcan D. Nanotechnology and developing countries–part
2: what realities? Online J. Nanotechnol. 2005, 1, a0104.
[8] Hassan MHA. Small things and big changes in the developing
world. Science 2005, 309, 65–66.
[9] Alfeeli B, Al-Rawashdeh M, Bumajdad A, Al Lawati H, Abdelga-
wad M, Baccar ZM, Salem IB, Benaskar F. A review of nano-
technology development in the Arab World. Nanotechnol. Rev.
2013, 2, 359–377.
[10] Murray CJ, Ortblad KF, Guinovart C, Lim SS, Wolock TM, Roberts
DA, Dansereau EA, Graetz N, Barber RM, Brown JC, Wang
H, Duber HC, Naghavi M, Dicker D, Dandona L, Salomon JA,
Heuton KR, Foreman K, Phillips DE, Fleming TD, Flaxman AD,
Phillips BK, Johnson EK, Coggeshall MS, Abd-Allah F, Abera
SF, Abraham JP, Abubakar I, Abu-Raddad LJ, Abu-Rmeileh NM,
Achoki T, Adeyemo AO, Adou AK, Adsuar JC, Agardh EE, Akena D,
Al Kahbouri MJ, Alasfoor D, Albittar MI, Alcalá-Cerra G, Alegretti
MA, Alemu ZA, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Alhabib S, Ali R, Alla F,
Allen PJ, Alsharif U, Alvarez E, Alvis-Guzman N, Amankwaa AA,
Amare AT, Amini H, Ammar W, Anderson BO, Antonio CA, Anwari
P, Arnlöv J, Arsenijevic VS, Artaman A, Asghar RJ, Assadi R,
Atkins LS, Badawi A, Balakrishnan K, Banerjee A, Basu S, Beard-
sley J, Bekele T, Bell ML, Bernabe E, Beyene TJ, Bhala N, Bhalla
A, Bhutta ZA, Abdulhak AB, Binagwaho A, Blore JD, Basara
BB, Bose D, Brainin M, Breitborde N, Castañeda-Orjuela CA,
Catalá-López F, Chadha VK, Chang JC, Chiang PP, Chuang TW,
Colomar M, Cooper LT, Cooper C, Courville KJ, Cowie BC, Criqui
MH, Dandona R, Dayama A, De Leo D, Degenhardt L, Del Pozo-
Cruz B, Deribe K, Des Jarlais DC, Dessalegn M, Dharmaratne
SD, Dilmen U, Ding EL, Driscoll TR, Durrani AM, Ellenbogen RG,
Ermakov SP, Esteghamati A, Faraon EJ, Farzadfar F, Fereshteh-
nejad SM, Fijabi DO, Forouzanfar MH, Fra Paleo U, Gaffikin L,
Gamkrelidze A, Gankpé FG, Geleijnse JM, Gessner BD, Gibney
KB, Ginawi IA, Glaser EL, Gona P, Goto A, Gouda HN, Gugnani
HC, Gupta R, Gupta R, Hafezi-Nejad N, Hamadeh RR, Ham-
mami M, Hankey GJ, Harb HL, Haro JM, Havmoeller R, Hay SI,
Hedayati MT, Pi IB, Hoek HW, Hornberger JC, Hosgood HD, Hotez
PJ, Hoy DG, Huang JJ, Iburg KM, Idrisov BT, Innos K, Jacobsen
KH, Jeemon P, Jensen PN, Jha V, Jiang G, Jonas JB, Juel K, Kan H,
Kankindi I, Karam NE, Karch A, Karema CK, Kaul A, Kawakami N,
Kazi DS, Kemp AH, Kengne AP, Keren A, Kereselidze M, Khader
YS, Khalifa SE, Khan EA, Khang YH, Khonelidze I, Kinfu Y, Kinge
JM, Knibbs L, Kokubo Y, Kosen S, Defo BK, Kulkarni VS, Kulkarni
C, Kumar K, Kumar RB, Kumar GA, Kwan GF, Lai T, Balaji AL,
Lam H, Lan Q, Lansingh VC, Larson HJ, Larsson A, Lee JT, Leigh
J, Leinsalu M, Leung R, Li Y, Li Y, De Lima GM, Lin HH, Lipshultz
SE, Liu S, Liu Y, Lloyd BK, Lotufo PA, Machado VM, Maclachlan
JH, Magis-Rodriguez C, Majdan M, Mapoma CC, Marcenes W,
Marzan MB, Masci JR, Mashal MT, Mason-Jones AJ, Mayosi
BM, Mazorodze TT, Mckay AC, Meaney PA, Mehndiratta MM,
Mejia-Rodriguez F, Melaku YA, Memish ZA, Mendoza W, Miller
TR, Mills EJ, Mohammad KA, Mokdad AH, Mola GL, Monasta
L, Montico M, Moore AR, Mori R, Moturi WN, Mukaigawara M,
Murthy KS, Naheed A, Naidoo KS, Naldi L, Nangia V, Narayan
KM, Nash D, Nejjari C, Nelson RG, Neupane SP, Newton CR, Ng
M, Nisar MI, Nolte S, Norheim OF, Nowaseb V, Nyakarahuka L,
Oh IH, Ohkubo T, Olusanya BO, Omer SB, Opio JN, Orisakwe
OE, Pandian JD, Papachristou C, Caicedo AJ, Patten SB, Paul VK,
Pavlin BI, Pearce N, Pereira DM, Pervaiz A, Pesudovs K, Petzold
M, Pourmalek F, Qato D, Quezada AD, Quistberg DA, Rafay A,
Rahimi K, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Ur Rahman S, Raju M, Rana SM,
344 A. Dube and N. Ebrahim: Nanomedicine in South Africa
Razavi H, Reilly RQ, Remuzzi G, Richardus JH, Ronfani L, Roy N,
Sabin N, Saeedi MY, Sahraian MA, Samonte GM, Sawhney M,
Schneider IJ, Schwebel DC, Seedat S, Sepanlou SG, Servan-Mori
EE, Sheikhbahaei S, Shibuya K, Shin HH, Shiue I, Shivakoti R,
Sigfusdottir ID, Silberberg DH, Silva AP, Simard EP, Singh JA,
Skirbekk V, Sliwa K, Soneji S, Soshnikov SS, Sreeramareddy
CT, Stathopoulou VK, Stroumpoulis K, Swaminathan S, Sykes
BL, Tabb KM, Talongwa RT, Tenkorang EY, Terkawi AS, Thomson
AJ, Thorne-Lyman AL, Towbin JA, Traebert J, Tran BX, Dimbuene
ZT, Tsilimbaris M, Uchendu US, Ukwaja KN, Uzun SB, Vallely
AJ, Vasankari TJ, Venketasubramanian N, Violante FS, Vlassov
VV, Vollset SE, Waller S, Wallin MT, Wang L, Wang X, Wang Y,
Weichenthal S, Weiderpass E, Weintraub RG, Westerman R,
White RA, Wilkinson JD, Williams TN, Woldeyohannes SM, Wong
JQ, Xu G, Yang YC, Yano Y, Yentur GK, Yip P, Yonemoto N, Yoon SJ,
Younis M, Yu C, Jin KY, El Sayed Zaki M, Zhao Y, Zheng Y, Zhou M,
Zhu J, Zou XN, Lopez AD, Vos T. Global, regional, and national
incidence and mortality for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria dur-
ing 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014, 384, 1005–1070.
[11] WHO. Health statistics and health information systems – Global
Health Estimates 2013 [cited 2016 19 September]; Available
from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/
estimates/en/index1.html.
[12] WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2016. [cited 2016 19Novem-
ber]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstr
eam/10665/250441/1/9789241565394-eng.pdf?ua=1.
[13] UNAIDS. Global AIDS Update. 2016 11November 2016]; Avail-
able from: http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/global-AIDS-
update-2016_en.pdf?ua=1.
[14] WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014.
[cited 2016 19November]. Available from: http://www.who.int/
nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/.
[15] Mabey D, Peeling RW, Ustianowski A, Perkins MD. Tropical
infectious diseases: Diagnostics for the developing world. Nat.
Rev. Micro. 2004, 2, 231–240.
[16] Gelperina S, Kisich K, Iseman MD, Heifets L. The potential
advantages of nanoparticle drug delivery systems in chemo-
therapy of tuberculosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005,
172, 1487–1490.
[17] Chen G, Roy I, Yang C, Prasad PN. Nanochemistry and nano-
medicine for nanoparticle-based diagnostics and therapy.
Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2826–2885.
[18] Wicki A, Witzigmann D, Balasubramanian V, Huwyler J. Nano-
medicine in cancer therapy: challenges, opportunities, and
clinical applications. J. Control. Release 2015, 200, 138–157.
[19] Augustine BH, Munro OQ, In to Africa: teaching nanoscience
to undergraduates in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. MRS Proc.
2011, 1320.
[20] Vorobiof DA, Rapoport BL, Mahomed R, Karime M. Phase II
study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with
metastatic malignant melanoma failing standard chemother-
apy treatment. Melanoma Res. 2003, 13, 201–203.
[21] Rapoport BL, Vorobiof DA, Slabber C, Alberts AS, Hlophe HS,
Mohammed C. Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxoru-
bicin and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive and
partially platinum-sensitive metastatic ovarian cancer. Int. J.
Gynecol. Cancer 2009, 19, 1137–1141.
[22] Du Toit LC, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Govender T, Carmichael TR. A
Drug Delivery Device. U.S. Patent US20140023692 A1, 2014.
[23] Tsai T, Pillay V, Choonara YE, Du Toit C. Polymeric Hydrogel
Compositions which Release Active Agents in Response to
Electrical Stimulus. U.S. Patent US20150313837 A1, 2015.
[24] Kalombo L. Nanoparticle Carriers for Drug Administration and
Process for Producing Same. U.S. Patent US8518450 B2, 2013.
[25] Fogel R, Limson J. Developing biosensors in developing coun-
tries: South Africa as a case study. Biosensors 2016, 6, 5.
[26] Pouris A. Nanoscale research in South Africa: a mapping exer-
cise based on scientometrics. Scientometrics 2007, 70, 541–553.
[27] Havel HA, Where are the nanodrugs? An industry perspective
on development of drug products containing nanomaterials.
AAPS J. 2016, 18, 1351–1353.
Bionotes
Admire Dube
Nanomedicine Research Group, School of
Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape,
Bellville, South Africa.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5684-6094
adube@uwc.ac.za
Admire Dube is a pharmaceutical scientist and Senior Lecturer in
Pharmaceutics at the School of Pharmacy, University of the Western
Cape (UWC) in Cape Town South Africa. He previously held a posi-
tion as Senior Researcher at the Council for Scientific and Industrial
Research in Pretoria South Africa where he was involved in commer-
cializing nanomedicines for malaria and tuberculosis treatment. At
UWC, his research group focuses on developing immune-modulatory
nanomedicines for treatment of infectious diseases. He holds a PhD
in Pharmaceutical Sciences from Monash University, Australia, and
Post-doctoral training in nanomedicine from the University at Buffalo,
USA. He has an interest in seeing Africa commercialize its first nano-
medicine, as well as enhancing pharmaceutical production in Africa.
Naushaad Ebrahim
Nanomedicine Research Group, School of
Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape,
Bellville, South Africa
Naushaad Ebrahim obtained his Bachelor of Pharmacy degree at
the University of the Western Cape (UWC), South Africa, and a PhD
at the same institution. He is a Pharmacist by training. Dr. Ebrahim
is currently a Senior lecturer in the Discipline of Pharmaceutics
and a Deputy Director at the School of Pharmacy at UWC, where he
has served as an academic for the last 15years. His research field
is in nanomedicine focusing on liposomal and phytosomal carrier
systems, which include the development of percutaneous absorp-
tion models for medicinal plants. Current projects he is involved
with include polymer coating of liposomes and phytosomal struc-
tures for increased drug delivery and stability.
Content uploaded by Admire Dube
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Admire Dube on Jan 18, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.