The ongoing Israeli architectural - sociological dialogue taking place among architects,
gerontologists, psychologists, and others, focuses on the cross - influence of people
and spaces and touches upon typologies, housing patterns, and social trends. Due to
this ongoing dialogue, it w as therefore expected to find a variety of residential
typologies that meet the changing human needs from birth to death. Surprisingly, the
housing typologies currently existing in Israel offer inter-community solutions to most
phases of human life, i.e., from birth to old age. However, for reasons unknown, it
created a segregated typological ecosystem for the last phase of life, suiting some, but
leaving many others dissatisfied and feeling excluded. Consequently, baby boomers,
known to be opinionated, well- off financially, proactive, and hedonistic, began
independently developing private initiatives of their own.
This study will pose in-depth questions about the architectural profession and its
disciplinary role in housing in the context of aging baby-boomers, their needs, desires,
and expected longevity.
It aims to identify how this excluded ecosystem was formed. Was it a proactive
decision, or was it the result of neglect? What are the costs and benefits of forming
this parallel typological system, who stands to gain from this situation, and who stands
to lose? What opportunities does the "parallel ecosystem" provide for its inhabitants,
what does it restrict them from doing, and how can architecture diversify and refine the typological options?
For analysis purposes, the research question was defined as follows:
How can the field of architecture enhance the knowledge base enabling the
development of new typological varieties that bridge the gap between aging baby boomers’ lifestyle demands and available typologies? This question will be researched through several sub-questions such as:
1.
Does the separate ecosystem described above properly cater to the unique needs
of the aging baby-boomer generation?
2.
How does it affect the existing heterogeneous residential typologies, or how does
the absence of adequate typologies affect the housing options for aging baby boomers?
3.
How do private initiatives created by aging baby-boomers change the typological
map, and what is the social price we pay for such initiatives? And lastly:
4.
How can a better housing policy support and direct such private initiatives in the
best interests of the general public?
In order to answer these questions, the research requires a complex process of
characterization and analysis of
residential typologies for the elderly, the
characterization of their needs, and the identification of gaps between desired and
existing solutions.
The review of literature relevant to these research questions deals with three main
fields of knowledge:
(1)
Old age, the elderly, and baby-boomers.
(2)
The fingerprints of baby-boomers in the planning and design of architectural
spaces.
(3)
The historical development of housing solutions for the elderly, focusing on the
collection of academic information about the trends,needs, and housing options
of adult housing. The research will identify and illuminate the unique needs, desires, and demands of
aging baby-boomers, as well as define the role of policymakers and the place of
architectural design in the context of planning future typologies for the elderly. It will do so by focusing on the "social aspects of architecture," which will help define third-age residential typologies and support home typologies for the general population.
Lastly, the research will address the ethical questions of architectural practice and the
role and responsibility of the architect in the inclusion or exclusion of the elderly
population from realm of general housing. These issues carry importance in both the architectural and sociological domains, and
the contribution of the research to both is critical for future work relating to baby
boomers.
This interdisciplinary study will use the mixed-methods approach combining qualitative
and quantitative inputs, for the following purposes:
(1) Decoding and mapping residential typologies in which aging baby boomers reside
today.
(2)
Mapping and characterizing gaps between desirable and existing typologies for
various economic levels of society.
(3)
Establishing ethnographic research and providing more
profound knowledge in the fields of human-space interaction and latent and overt needs of aging baby boomers from residential typologies.
(4)
Using case studies to identify housing parameters affecting private and public
spaces.
(5)
Cross-linking personal, political and social data to identify nodes that can influence
future residential typology planning.
(6)
Examining ways for fruitful interaction between regulation and private
entrepreneurship.
The research findings were mapped in four knowledge areas: a) global and local
mapping of existing adult residential typologies; b) push and pull factors of aging baby
boomers in their decision to change their place of residence; c) comparative view of
case studies; and d) identification of gaps between desired
and existing typologies through the decision process.
a)
Global and local mapping of existing adult residential typologies
Typologies for the elderly are traditionally divided in the professional literature into
three main groups: institutional housing; age-oriented community housing; and
home housing. This research revealed the incoherence of such a division, mainly
in view of the fact that the "home" and "institutional" categories are both from the
architectural field, while the "age-oriented housing" category is from the
sociological field. This creates difficulty in deciphering the structural qualities of the
category "age-oriented housing". The incoherence is felt both in the gerontological
field, in which there is difficulty in defining criteria for sheltered housing (Doron &
Lazar. 2014), and in the architectural field, which seeks to define a minimum
standard for senior housing.
The new division formulated in the study (domestic or institutional only), enabled
a remapping that revealed a typological gap in Israel. This gap, referred to in the
research as a "missing piece", was defined as follows: A domestic and
independent living space that provides a comprehensive support envelope and
age-oriented social association.
b)
Push and pull factors of aging baby boomers in their decision to change residence.
The study examined pull and push factors, which were divided into two main
categories, namely: Adults who decided to move into sheltered housing, and adults
who decided to move into an alternative apartment in
the heterogeneous community.
The findings regarding main push factors, which motivate baby boomers to leave
an existing apartment, were found to be similar for both defined groups: Difficulties
in maintenance, accessibility needs and lacking a "sense of s
ecurity".
On the other hand, significant differences were found between the two groups
regarding pull factors, i.e., the factors influencing the choice of the new place of
residence. While the "sheltered housing" group defined future medical needs,
social needs, and the possibility of aging in place (remaining in the same place of
residence for the duration of their lives), as pull factors (i.e., silencing future fears),
the "housing in the community" group defined building quality, family and a familiar
living environment as the main pull factors (i.e., current quality of life).
c) Comparative view of case studies
The study examined four existing residential typologies for the elderly in Israel: (1)
public sheltered housing, 1960; (2) private sheltered housing, 1980; (3) housing in
a luxury tower, 2017; and (4) housing in a residential cooperative, 2020 (the first
and such arrangements in Israel to date). A comparative view of the above case studies will be presented in chronological
order and catalogued into three main categories: The human aspects, the planning
aspects, and the economic aspects.
The discussion regarding the human aspects reveals significant gaps between the old typologies and the new ones; the findings show that the new domestic typologies attract adults who are in their third age. That said, it is important to note
that these typologies (despite their precise fit and their availability in a multi-age environment) remain unavailable for the entire Israeli elderly population, probably because the y are private initiatives of tenants, (aging and wealthy baby
boomers). In the context of the old residential typologies (public and private sheltered
housing), the study found that the dwellers of both are elderly residents who are
either in the third age (after middle age and before old age, when they are still active) and f ourth age (when they are no longer active and often require care).
The study found that the public housing typology alleviates existential fears and keeps adults in the third age, while the private sheltered housing typology accelerates the transition to the fourth age, if only because it is a homogeneous and isolated environment.
The discussion on the planning aspects also indicates a division between new and
old. While the two old typologies offer plans based on architectural principles of
institutional structures, the new typologies were found to be "domestic" in all the
planning resolutions that were studied. Based on these two aspects (human and
planning) the domestic typologies are rated highest, followed by the public sheltered housing, and lastly, the private sheltered housing, which is known for its
high, and probably unjustified cost.
The economic aspects are studied according to availability to the adult population
in Israel. The findings indicate an uneven distribution, with housing solutions
available only to those who are at both ends of the spectrum: To those belonging
to the low socioeconomic echelon, the residential option of public housing for
adults is offered; while at the opposite end–the upper class, the residential options
of private sheltered housing and luxury towers are available. Consequently, the
needs of most of the elderly in Israel remain unanswered, and they are forced to
find solutions on their own. The findings emphasize the urgent need to develop
new housing solutions, which should preferably be led by the state, since only
regulatory bodies, free of economic interests, are able to define the end users’
needs as the primary goal.
The study reveals the critical role that housing plays in delaying the transition from
the third age to the fourth, and moreover, it refines the understanding that
architecture, beyond being a planning methodology, is a fundamental tool for
shaping the behavior and preserving adults in the third age.
d) Identification of gaps between desired and existing typologies through the decision
process Mapping the decision-making process enabled deciphering critical elements in it.
It revealed that this process begins in the sociological/psychological field, which defines the call for action factors (catalyst), the hierarchy of decision makers and the pull/push factors, and continues by adding the architectural layer, which
examines the supply of existing housing. While mapping these fields: The sociological/psychological, and the architectural, we found one overl
apping point. This point, defined as "motivations for spatial change", leads to three paths: Voluntary transition, transition out of fear, and
transition due to necessity.
Transition due to necessity refers to “no choice” situations that usually characterize
persons who experience sharp physical, cognitive, or mental decline. Unequivocally defined in the research as being in the fourth age, they are forced to find a place of residence based on medical/functional needs, which are the top
priority. In such cases, the decision is usually made by default rather than free
choice. Since this study focused on the free choice of elderly baby boomers, it did
not map the needs and desires of this segment, and therefore, is unable to provide
information from user testi monies.
Voluntary transition: Characterized in the research as a transition to improve the
quality of life, it usually applies to older baby boomers who are in their third age.
They do not consider themselves old, and therefore reject residential options which
emphasize age indicators, as such places clearly imply or "remind" them of their
chronological age. The study found that this segment of the population prefers
domestic residential typologies, despite knowing that they might need to make
another transition in the future. The study indicates that they are able to find
adequate solutions within the domestic typologies.
Lastly, transition due to fear: This is the core of this study, which discusses the
choices of older baby boomers, and offers multiple in sights that help understand the process. The findings reveal that people who "transition due to fear" are usually older people who have unexpectedly experienced some kind of shock in certain areas of life, such as illness, sudden loss, a sense of danger or loneliness. This disruption, when experienced by baby boomers who had led a carefree life on one end of the pendulum, and are suddenly flung to its other end, causes many fears, anguish and distress. This unexpected event influences the course of their life and decisions, from defining their subjective age, and continuing with the decision to change their living space. The study found that at this point in their lives, people are willing to accept many compromises, including living in institutional typologies, living in marginalized heterogeneous spaces, and even accepting excessively high market prices, all in order to alleviate future fears that do not necessarily materialize in reality.
This architectural study illuminated turning points, which provoke thoughts and questions about the hierarchy of decision makers, owners of funds, users and architects, and especially about the ability and responsibility of the various
stakeholders to address the needs of a growing generation that seeks an effective
change in planning systems.
The research sought to raise public and professional awareness, and above all, to
serve as the wake-up call, or even the "panic button" of older baby boomers who
desperately need architecture to return to its literal "home turf".