ArticlePDF Available

Open Ephys electroencephalography (Open Ephys + EEG): a modular, low-cost, open-source solution to human neural recording

IOP Publishing
Journal of Neural Engineering
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Objective. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a unique opportunity to study human neural activity non-invasively with millisecond resolution using minimal equipment in or outside of a lab setting. EEG can be combined with a number of techniques for closed-loop experiments, where external devices are driven by specific neural signals. However, reliable, commercially available EEG systems are expensive, often making them impractical for individual use and research development. Moreover, by design, a majority of these systems cannot be easily altered to the specification needed by the end user. We focused on mitigating these issues by implementing open-source tools to develop a new EEG platform to drive down research costs and promote collaboration and innovation. Approach. Here, we present methods to expand the open-source electrophysiology system, Open Ephys (www.openephys.org), to include human EEG recordings. We describe the equipment and protocol necessary to interface various EEG caps with the Open Ephys acquisition board, and detail methods for processing data. We present applications of Open Ephys + EEG as a research tool and discuss how this innovative EEG technology lays a framework for improved closed-loop paradigms and novel brain-computer interface experiments. Main results. The Open Ephys + EEG system can record reliable human EEG data, as well as human EMG data. A side-by-side comparison of eyes closed 8–14 Hz activity between the Open Ephys + EEG system and the Brainvision ActiCHamp EEG system showed similar average power and signal to noise. Significance. Open Ephys + EEG enables users to acquire high-quality human EEG data comparable to that of commercially available systems, while maintaining the price point and extensibility inherent to open-source systems.
Open Ephys EEG breakout board. (a) Unpopulated board showing Pak-50 connector positions for connecting to electrode cap (green), Omnetics positions for connecting to Amplifier, headstage (blue), header pins for re-referencing, and sourcing additional electrophysiological signals such as EMG or EOG (orange). (b) Default connection; (top figure) jumpers placed in the red positions route four single EEG cap connections (Pak-50) to the Omnetics connector to record all EEG channels, jumpers placed in the orange positions route EEG reference position to Omnetics connector; (bottom figure) the board layout corresponding to the default schematic shows jumpers colored red and orange for correct placement for the positions detailed in the schematic. (c) Re-routing connections; (top figure) jumpers placed in the blue positions re-route up to four connections from the Omnetics connector on the far right to allow recording other biopotential measurements such as EMG or EOG, jumpers placed in the green positions re-route the reference connections for the corresponding Omnetics connectors, allowing you to specify the reference of the signal; (bottom figure) the board layout corresponding to the re-routing schematic shows jumpers colored in blue and green for correct placement for the positions detailed in the schematic, as well as two connector pins of the same colors to show the corresponding connections for external electrodes (out of figure). For top figures in (b) and (c) solid black lines indicate recorded sources, dotted black lines indicate non-recorded sources.
… 
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Journal of Neural Engineering
PAPER
Open Ephys electroencephalography (Open
Ephys + EEG): a modular, low-cost, open-source
solution to human neural recording
To cite this article: Christopher Black et al 2017 J. Neural Eng. 14 035002
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
Related content
Open Ephys: an open-source, plugin-
based platform for multichannel
electrophysiology
Joshua H Siegle, Aarón Cuevas López,
Yogi A Patel et al.
-
Open source modules for tracking animal
behavior and closed-loop stimulation
based on Open Ephys and Bonsai
Alessio Paolo Buccino, Mikkel Elle
Lepperød, Svenn-Arne Dragly et al.
-
Intsy: a low-cost, open-source, wireless
multi-channel bioamplifier system
Jonathan C Erickson, James A Hayes,
Mauricio Bustamante et al.
-
Recent citations
Ultrasound-guided, open-source
microneurography: Approaches to improve
recordings from peripheral nerves in man
James P. Dunham et al
-
Open source modules for tracking animal
behavior and closed-loop stimulation
based on Open Ephys and Bonsai
Alessio Paolo Buccino et al
-
Intsy: a low-cost, open-source, wireless
multi-channel bioamplifier system
Jonathan C Erickson et al
-
This content was downloaded from IP address 128.218.43.233 on 08/02/2019 at 01:14
1 © 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK
Journal of Neural Engineering
Open Ephys electroencephalography
(Open Ephys + EEG): a modular, low-cost,
open-source solution to human neural
recording
ChristopherBlack1, JakobVoigts2,3, UdayAgrawal2, MaxLadow2,
JuanSantoyo2, ChristopherMoore2 and StephanieJones2
1 Center for Biomedical Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
2 Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
3 Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA,
United States of America
E-mail: christopher_black@brown.edu and jvoigts@mit.edu
Received 17 October 2016, revised 1 March 2017
Accepted for publication 7 March 2017
Published 30 March 2017
Abstract
Objective. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a unique opportunity to study human neural
activity non-invasively with millisecond resolution using minimal equipment in or outside of
a lab setting. EEG can be combined with a number of techniques for closed-loop experiments,
where external devices are driven by specic neural signals. However, reliable, commercially
available EEG systems are expensive, often making them impractical for individual use and
research development. Moreover, by design, a majority of these systems cannot be easily
altered to the specication needed by the end user. We focused on mitigating these issues by
implementing open-source tools to develop a new EEG platform to drive down research costs
and promote collaboration and innovation. Approach. Here, we present methods to expand
the open-source electrophysiology system, Open Ephys (www.openephys.org), to include
human EEG recordings. We describe the equipment and protocol necessary to interface
various EEG caps with the Open Ephys acquisition board, and detail methods for processing
data. We present applications of Open Ephys + EEG as a research tool and discuss how this
innovative EEG technology lays a framework for improved closed-loop paradigms and novel
brain-computer interface experiments. Main results. The Open Ephys + EEG system can
record reliable human EEG data, as well as human EMG data. A side-by-side comparison of
eyes closed 814 Hz activity between the Open Ephys + EEG system and the Brainvision
ActiCHamp EEG system showed similar average power and signal to noise. Signicance.
Open Ephys + EEG enables users to acquire high-quality human EEG data comparable to
that of commercially available systems, while maintaining the price point and extensibility
inherent to open-source systems.
Keywords: open source, EEG, electrophysiology, Open Ephys, low-cost
(Some guresmay appear in colour only in the online journal)
C Black etal
Printed in the UK
035002
JNEIEZ
© 2017 IOP Publishing Ltd
14
J. Neural Eng.
JNE
1741-2552
10.1088/1741-2552/aa651f
Paper
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
IOP
2017
1741-2552/17/035002+14$33.00
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa651f
J. Neural Eng. 14 (2017) 035002 (14pp)
C Black etal
2
Introduction
Since its inception in the 1920s by Hans Berger, electroen-
cephalography (EEG) has been an integral tool in the study of
human neural activity (Berger 1935). Electrodes placed on the
scalp monitor small changes in electric potential (microvolt
scale) created by the synchronous activation of 1020 cm2 of
cortical tissue (Nunez and Srinivasan 2006). While its spatial
resolution is limited, EEG can register oscillations that occur
at frequencies as high as 500 Hz, known as fast ripples, (Baker
etal 2003) or as slow as sub-1 Hz, known as slow wave oscil-
lations (Marshall et al 2006, Nunez and Srinivasan 2006).
EEG has a wide variety of applications from its role as a diag-
nostic tool in clinical conditions such as Parkinsons Disease
(Soikkeli etal 1991) and epilepsy (Gotman 1982), to studying
cognitive processes such as memory (Klimesch 1999) and
attention (Worden etal 2000), to unraveling the mechanisms
of transcranial electric stimulation for neural modulation
(Helfrich etal 2014), to being used in brain-comp uter inter-
face (Farwell and Donchin 1988) (BCI) technologies for the
operation of prosthetics (Guger et al 1999) and computers
(Wolpaw etal 1991).
The utility of EEG, however, is masked by the tools pro-
vided by most commercial EEG manufacturers. Current com-
mercial EEG systems can cost upwards of $60 000 dollars or
more; for example, the BioSemi system (www.biosemi.com/
faq/prices.htm) costs 21 000 ($22 662.15) for a 32 channel
system and 44 000 for a 128 channel system ($47 482.60),
while the Brainvision actiCHamp system (www.brainvision.
com/actichamp.html) costs $28 460 for a 32 channel system
and $64 000 for a 128 channel system. These high-cost sys-
tems are problematic for small-scale academic and teaching
settings where limited resources often dictate the freedom
of purchasing and work-ow. More often than not these sys-
tems only allow for passive data acquisition; meaning signals
are collected and analyzed off-line. It is possible, however,
to implement software packages to utilize these commercial
systems in closed-loop BCI control as well as neurofeedback
applications. For example, the BCI2000 system is an integra-
tive software package used for BCI research that interfaces
with data acquisition systems to collect and process data on-
line, and allow for control of external devices (Schalk et al
2004). Despite this, proprietary hardware and software still
create a large barrier for researchers to tailor EEG systems to
t their research. However, in the past decade, open-source
information sharing has galvanized the production of low-cost,
easily accessible, human-based neurotechnologies that include
EEG. For example, the OpenBCI system (www.openbci.com/)
is a popular, modular, open-source tool for recording human
EEG. OpenBCI has several, wireless systems; from 4-channels
($199), to 8-channels ($499), to 16-channels ($949.99).
Additionally, the system can be linked so a 32-channel system
would be the price of two 16-channel systems ($1899.98).
They have also developed an open-source EEG headset, the
Ultracortex ($249.99–$349.99). To add to their low-cost tech,
they also have extensive documentation to help users learn
more about the equipment they are using. In the event that the
documentation is not enough, there is a large user community
where individuals can ask questions, post messages about their
research, and even take part in or create scientic challenges.
Backyard brains, an open-source company geared towards
making neuroscience research accessible to everyone, has a
one-channel EEG system ($149.99) along with a host of other
EMG and neural recording tools. As with OpenBCI, Backyard
brains also has quite a bit of documentation that ranges from
general user support to experimental instructions on how to
control a robotic arm through EMG. They even have a page
dedicated to the ethics of their work, as well as a blog for
posting updates. OpenViBE is another company that develops
software for real-time data analysis as well as BCI develop-
ment (Renard etal 2010), and BCI2000, alluded to earlier, is
also an open community that provides their software and doc-
umentation for free (www.schalklab.org/research/bci2000).
These projects have not only pioneered human EEG research,
but they continue to develop new and unique tools for moving
neuroscience forward.
To continue the growth of the open-source technologies we
have developed a new EEG system built on the Open Ephys
platform (www.open-ephys.org). To date, Open Ephys has
been developed and used for extracellular recordings with tet-
rodes (Gray etal 1995) in rodents (Siegle and Wilson 2014)
and Pogona dragons (Shein-Idelson etal 2016). In using this
system, we build on the versatility of Open Ephys so that a
single system can not only record extracellular potentials in
animals, but also scalp potentials in humans. Here, we present
detailed methods to expand Open Ephyss utility to include
these human EEG recordings, and show several examples of
its use and comparison to a standard EEG system. Lastly, we
discuss future research directions, including application to
closed-loop experiments.
1. Adapting Open Ephys to EEG: components
andassembly
All EEG systems are composed of an electrode cap, digital
ampliers, a data acquisition system, and a computer. The
electrode cap is used to pick up small electric potentials on
the scalp, the digital ampliers amplify the incoming small
signals to be read out by the computer, the data acquisition
system registers the incoming neural data and tags it with a
time stamp, and the computer allows for visualization, data
storage, and data analysis. Our Open Ephys + EEG system
includes each of these components. In this sectionwe describe
the exact components used and associated current day costs
(section 1.1, table 1), and methods for assembly with esti-
mated assembly time (section 1.2).
1.1. Open Ephys + EEG components and costs
The rst piece of our system is an electrode cap (gure 1(a)).
Electrode caps are available commercially and can have a
range of characteristics. Electrode caps can consist of just
a ground, a reference, and a signal electrode, or they can
be made of high density arrays with upwards of 500 elec-
trodes. They can also record through different mediums; wet
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
3
caps consist of a metal electrode that conducts ohmic cur-
rent from the scalp via a conductive gel, whereas dry caps
pick up scalp currents from a capacitive link. Additionally,
caps can be passive, meaning signals picked up from elec-
trodes are sent directly to neural recording ampliers, or they
can be active, meaning there is a pre-amplication step for
eliminated environ mental noise before the signal is recorded.
These different electrode cap features change the price drasti-
cally and have different implications for a given experiment.
Fortunately, any commercially available electrode cap can be
used for the Open Ephys + EEG system provided an appro-
priate connector for the cap can be acquired and the pin layout
is known. Table1 includes the price range for a lower end cap;
the passive, wet, 32-channel EasyCap, to a higher end cap; the
active, wet, 64-channel BrainVision ActiCap.
In order to transfer neural signals from the electrode cap
to a computer, the EEG cap must rst be connected directly
into an Open Ephys + EEG breakout board (gure 1(b)). This
breakout board is the intermediate piece that enables us to
interface the EEG cap to the Open Ephys ampliers (gure
1(c)), so that EEG signals can be amplied and sent to the
Open Ephys acquisition board (gure 1(d)), which converts
the signals to a format that can be read by a PC (gure 1(e)).
Specically, a fully assembled Open Ephys + EEG breakout
board, as shown in gures1(b) and 2, has four male Pak-50
connectors for connecting up to four 32-channel EEG inputs
(128-channels of EEG data in total). These connectors are
relatively inexpensive, currently costing under $10 each
(table 1). The four Pak-50 connectors are linked via conduc-
tive traces to four female Omnetics NPD-36-VV-GS connec-
tors (see gure 2(b)) that can be directly connected to four
separate Open Ephys ampliers (gure 1(c)). Currently, the
Omnetics connectors can only be purchased in orders of four
or more (table 1).
To help with data quality and analysis in EEG, it is often
necessary to change the reference point or to include an
Table 1. List of parts, manufacturers, and costs, for both 32 channel, and 128 channel Open Ephys EEG system to date (February 2017).
Component Company Vendor Site Cost
EEG electrode cap
EasyCap, ActiCap EasyCap, Brainvision www.easycap.com,
www.brainvision.com
$1900.00–$16 040.00
EEG breakout board
Breakout board Open Ephys www.seeedstudio.com $20.00
Nano strip connector NPD-36-VV-GS Omnetics Connector Corporation www.omnetics.com $62.16–$248.64 (×4)
Headers (3-pin) Harwin Inc. www.digikey.com $1.36 (×8)
Headers (8-pin) Harwin Inc. www.digikey.com $0.90 (×2)
Pak-50 connectors 3M www.digikey.com $6.55–$26.20 (×4)
Amplier
32 channel Headstage Intan Technologies www.intantech.com $995.00–$3980 (×4)
SPI Cable Intan Technologies www.intantech.com $295.00–$1180 (×4)
Data Acquisition
Acquisition Board Open Ephys www.labmaker.org $2350.00
Computer (Ideacenter AI0) Lenovo www.lenovo.com $1400.00
Total: $7060.97–$25 247.10
Figure 1. Schematic for Open Ephys with EEG connectivity. (a) Scalp potentials are registered by an electrode cap, which are then sent
to (b) the EEG breakout board that interfaces with (c) Intan Amplier based headstages. Amplied signals are sent via an SPI cable to the
(d)Acquisition Board and are then sent via USB to (e) a PC for visualization and data storage.
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
4
additional modality of recording to track sources of biological
noise such as electrooculography (EOG) or electromyography
(EMG). The Open Ephys + EEG breakout board shown in
gures1(b) and 2 includes twelve series of headers, or pins,
to allow for re-sourcing amplier inputs from EEG to an addi-
tional electrophysiological signal such as an EMG or EOG,
and for re-referencing signals on the y. This can be done
using a series of jumper connectors to create an electrical con-
nection between two header pins.
The reference pin of each Omnetics connector is con-
nected to a header pin on the EEG breakout board (gure
2(a), orange, far right). Figure2(b) depicts the default mode
of recording, which maintains the reference connection as
the EEG cap reference electrode. To use the default scheme,
simply place a jumper in the highlighted orange positions
depicted in gure2(b) (bottom), this will connect the Pak-50
reference position with the Omnetics reference position.
To re-route any of the reference connections to an external
electrode, place a jumper in the highlighted green positions
depicted in gure2(c) (bottom), and connect an external elec-
trode to the corresponding header pin (2c, bottom), this will
connect the Omnetics reference pin to an open header pin on
the breakout board. Additionally, the Omnetics connector on
the far right of the breakout board has up to four inputs that
can be re-routed from the EEG Pak-50 connector to header
pins allowing the recording of EMG and EOG, for example.
To re-route these inputs, place a jumper in the blue positions
depicted in gure2(c) (bottom) and an external electrode to
Figure 2. Open Ephys EEG breakout board. (a) Unpopulated board showing Pak-50 connector positions for connecting to electrode
cap (green), Omnetics positions for connecting to Amplier, headstage (blue), header pins for re-referencing, and sourcing additional
electrophysiological signals such as EMG or EOG (orange). (b) Default connection; (top gure) jumpers placed in the red positions route
four single EEG cap connections (Pak-50) to the Omnetics connector to record all EEG channels, jumpers placed in the orange positions
route EEG reference position to Omnetics connector; (bottom gure) the board layout corresponding to the default schematic shows
jumpers colored red and orange for correct placement for the positions detailed in the schematic. (c) Re-routing connections; (top gure)
jumpers placed in the blue positions re-route up to four connections from the Omnetics connector on the far right to allow recording
other biopotential measurements such as EMG or EOG, jumpers placed in the green positions re-route the reference connections for the
corresponding Omnetics connectors, allowing you to specify the reference of the signal; (bottom gure) the board layout corresponding to
the re-routing schematic shows jumpers colored in blue and green for correct placement for the positions detailed in the schematic, as well
as two connector pins of the same colors to show the corresponding connections for external electrodes (out of gure). For top guresin (b)
and (c) solid black lines indicate recorded sources, dotted black lines indicate non-recorded sources.
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
5
the corresponding header pin (2c, bottom). Headers can be
purchased at any electronic store for under $3.00 in total.
Signals sent through the Open Ephys + EEG breakout
board are received and amplied by an Open Ephys compat-
ible Intan headstage (gure 1(c); one example shown here but
up to 4 could be used). The headstage is a small, thumb-sized
(2.2 × 1.3 cm) printed circuit board (PCB) that houses the
amplier chip used to amplify incoming EEG signals. Open
Ephys implements low-power Intan Technologies amplier
chips (RHD2000) that can amplify 32 or 64 channels of neural
data by 192 V/V with an output range of ±5 mV. Analog sig-
nals are multiplexed, which allows a large number of channels
to share a single 16-bit ADC. These chips have low input-
referred noise (2.4 µVRMS upper bound) and large range upper
(100 Hz20 kHz) and lower (0.1 Hz500 Hz) bandwidth set-
tings, making them ideal for a variety of neural recordings.
Some EEG systems use DC ampliers, which allow for
recording signals with little to no frequency content. While
the Intan chip is not a DC amplier, the bandwidth settings
can be adjusted using off-chip resistors to be 10 Hz30 kHz,
and 0.02 Hz1.0 kHz for upper and lower bandwidths, respec-
tively (Technologies I 2013). This allows for recording slower
oscillatory events such as infraslow oscillations (Vanhatalo
etal 2004). The headstage has two connective ports; one to
interface recording electrodes to amplier input (male 36
channel Omnetics connector), and the other (Omnetics PZN-
12-AA) to interface via serial-peripheral interface (SPI) with
the data acquisition board. From here an SPI cable transfers
data through to the data acquisition system (gure 1(d)).
Compatible Open Ephys headstages can be purchased directly
through Intan Technologies (table 1) along with SPI cables.
The Open Ephys acquisition board (gure 1(d)) allows for
recording between 32 and 256 channels with USB 2.0, or up
to 512 channels using USB 3.0. While such a high recording
count is excessive for most EEG experiments, which typi-
cally record between 32128 channels, the ability to record
high channel counts comes at no extra cost to the user as
their recording capacity is dictated only by the number of
headstages and SPI cables they purchase. This means that
to move from a 32-channel system to a 128 channel system,
the user will need to purchase three more headstages and
SPI cables. Amplier outputs are sent to the headstage con-
nectors (gure 3(e)) of the acquisition board. The heart of
the acquisition board is an Opal Kelly XEM6010 eld pro-
grammable gate array (FPGA), which receives input from
peripheral devices (e.g. the EEG cap) to process and sort
incoming data. The data is then sent via USB or PCI express
serial bus to transfer data from the acquisition board to the
PC. Additionally, there are 8 analog input/output (IO) ports
(gures 3(a) and (b)) to register event data sent from external
devices, and 8 digital IO ports (gures 3(c) and (d)) for reg-
istering analog signals. The Open Ephys acquisition system
can be purchased through the Open Ephys webstore (www.
open-ephys.org/store/).
Finally, the PC (gure 1(e)) accepts incoming data packaged
from the acquisition board. Here, streaming data can be visual-
ized through the Open Ephys graphic user interface (GUI). The
Open Ephys GUI can be downloaded for free as an executable
(www.open-ephys.org/gui/) or can be compiled from source
code (https://github.com/open-ephys/GUI). The Open Ephys
GUI is multi-platform, working on Linux, Windows, and Mac
OS. Essentially, any computer would be compatible for run-
ning the Open Ephys GUI and recording data, so long as it has
a USB interface. Depending on the intentions of use a powerful
computer might be required to also run data analysis. However,
for the purposes of running the Open Ephys GUI and recording
data, any standard laptop or desktop will work.
In total, with current pricing, a brand new Open
Ephys + EEG system, including a new EEG cap and comp-
uter, will cost approximately $7060.97 on the low-end, which
consists of a 32 channel system with a passive cap, and
$25 247.10 on the high end, which consist of a 128 channel
system with an active cap. However, if the user can utilize
a previously purchased EEG cap and computer, the total
cost of the system will be between only $5130.97 (32-chan-
nels)–$9207.10 (128-channels).
1.2. Open Ephys + EEG assembly and timeline
Open Ephys + EEG requires minimal work once the proper
components have been purchased (table 1). At this time, the
Open Ephys + EEG breakout board schematics and design les
as shown can be freely downloaded (www.github.com/open-
ephys) and sent to a company for manufacturing. Many com-
panies offer PCB manufacturing. For breakout board shown
in gures1(b) and 2, we employed seeed studio (www.seeed-
studio.com) for printing. In order to submit a print request, you
upload the design les to the vendor website, and then select
specics about the design that will be necessary for printing. For
seeed studio, the only necessary options are a PCB dimension
of 10 cm × 10 cm, and two printing layers. The other options,
such as PCB quantity, PCB color, surface nish, etc, can be set
to their default values or changed for preference.
The PCB will come separate from the Omnetics connec-
tors, Pak-50 connectors, and the headers; however, setting
Figure 3. Input and output connections of Open Ephys Acquisition
Board. (a) ±5 V analog output, (b) ±5 V analog input, (c) 0/5
V digital output, (d) 0/5 V digital input, (e) SPI terminal for
connecting to Intan based headstages. Photo adapted from www.
open-ephys.org.
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
6
up the complete EEG breakout board requires minimal self-
assembly consisting of soldering together a few key comp-
onents (gure 2, table1). Assembly is quite straightforward
and listed in 3 easy steps here:
1. Solder one Pak-50 connector to each of the four positions in
gure2(a) (green). The Pak-50 connectors are through-
hole mounted, and contain a mixture of mounting pins,
signal pins, and a ground and reference pin.
2. Solder one Omnetics connector to each of the four posi-
tions in gure 2(a) (blue). The Omentics connectors
are surface-mount devices (SMDs), which means the
solder connections all occur on the surface of the PCB,
as opposed to a through hole mount, where soldering
connections occur on the opposite side of the PCB.
Soldering SMDs can be difcult, especially when dealing
with such small connectors. One method to solder these
pieces is to carefully deposit a small amount of solder to
the surface pads of the connector on the PCB. Then, line
up the Omentics connector so all the feet are on top of
the corresponding pad; you may want to hold the con-
nector in position using a small clamp or carefully using
your hands. Once secure, place the soldering iron onto
the connector feet, individually, and press them into the
deposited solder. After soldering the Omnetics connec-
tors, apply epoxy around the base of the connector where
it meets the PCB. This will ensure stability of the connec-
tors, as the connections formed by the solder will break
under too much mechanical stress.
3. Solder the header pins into each of the positions shown in
gure2(a) (orange).
Timeline: Altogether this process should take anywhere
from 2 to 4 h, the bulk of this time being the soldering of the
Omnetics connectors as the contacts are quite small. Once the
epoxy has set, the adaptor will be ready for use.
1.3. Electrical safety
Electrical safety is a source of concern when dealing with
EEG as the electrodes provide a low-resistance path for
electrical current to ow. If there are any faults in wiring
or a power surge occurs, it is possible that current will ow
through the electrodes, to the person, and out through the
ground. Inducing currents into a person can lead to excitation,
heating, and burning of tissue, which can result in pain, injury,
or in extreme cases, death. At high enough currents (0.1100
A), a few seconds of exposure to the mains voltage is enough
to produce these effects (Webster 2009). A solution for this
problem is to electrically decouple the subject from the mains
supply (Ebner etal 1999).
One method of isolation, which is currently with Open
Ephys + EEG, is implementing a battery pack. This is the pre-
ferred method of most commercially available systems. The
battery pack is intended to run the entire system from a power
source that is electrically isolated from the mains voltage. A
downside to this method is the fact that the length of recording
will be based off of the load imposed on your battery pack and
its internal powering capacity. Another method is to create a
power isolation circuit that decouples the subject completely
from the isolation power (Tyner et al 1983, Tallgren 2006).
This is currently being developed for Open Ephys (https://
github.com/open-ephys/headstage-isolation-board) in accord-
ance with IEC 60601-1 standards for medical electrical equip-
ment. The isolation circuit will create an interface between
the ampliers and the acquisition board. Data from the ampli-
ers will be transferred via Analog Devices digital isolators
(ADuM240 series), which have previously been implemented
for meeting above IEC standards, power will be provided to
the amplier by a DC-DC transformer, while ground planes
will be separated into an isolated participant ground (ampli-
er side) and the true ground (acquisition board side) (Abtahi
etal 2015). These methods serve to electrically decouple the
amplier from the mains supply so that potentially dangerous
currents cannot reach the participant (Piipponen et al 2007,
Lee etal 2012). This isolation circuit, however, is currently
still in development. We advise those interested in using the
Open Ephys + EEG system for human recordings consult
their Institutional Review Board (IRB), and determine the
appropriate safety standards and practices as they apply to
their institution.
2. Using the Open Ephys GUI
Once all components are purchased and assembled, you will
only need to congure the Open Ephys GUI to begin recording.
After downloading the GUI from (www.open-ephys.org/gui/),
start by clicking on the Open Ephys executable, which will
open a new window (gure 4). On the left hand side of the
window you will see a list of Processors (gure 4(a)) con-
sisting of Filters, Sinks, and Utilities. For the purposes here we
will only describe the minimal setup you will need for running
a basic EEG recording; however, many of the processors in the
GUI may be useful for more advanced EEG experiments. The
GUI works by dragging and dropping modules into the signal
chain (gure 4(b)), which sets the path for incoming data.
First, drag and drop the Rhythm FPGA module to the signal
chain (gure 4(c)). The Rhythm FPGA module is what initi-
ates communication with the FPGA in the acquisition board.
Here you have control over the acquisition board; you can
change the sampling rate, toggle the recording of all digital
and analog channels, control processes of the ampliers, and
even change the operation of LEDs on the board. Next, it will
likely be useful to incorporate a lter; as most EEG signals
are recording within the 0.1100 Hz range. Drag and drop the
Bandpass Filter module to the right of the Rhythm FPGA
module in the signal chain (gure 4(d)), and set the lowcut to
0.1 and the high cut to 100, for example. This will then take
the incoming raw data from the FPGA and lter it within the
prescribed band. Finally, to visualize the data in real-time, drag
and drop the LFP Viewer module to the right of the Bandpass
Filter module in the signal chain (gure 4(e)). If you click on
the top hat on the LFP Viewer in the signal chain, it will open
a new viewing window where you can look at incoming data,
toggle the view, and change the scaling.
To save the data, simply click on the drop down arrow on
the top right of the Open Ephys GUI window. In the prompt,
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
7
select the desired le format (discussed in section 3.1), le
path, and le name to save (gure 4(f )).
3. Data analysis
Streamlining and simplifying data processing is an important
hallmark that new recording methods must have in order to
be desirable for consumer use. In an attempt to make the pro-
cessing of Open Ephys data an easy transition for EEG users,
here we describe how Open Ephys data can be handled a
variety of ways. Our exible open-source methods allow indi-
vidual users the freedom to create their own analysis tools for
their system and needs. Below we highlight two main consid-
erations in handling Open Ephys + EEG data: (1) data types
and conversion (section 3.1), and (2) noise reduction (section
3.2).
3.1. Data types and conversions
Open Ephys data can be saved directly to four le types: Open
Ephys, Flat binary, NWB, and KWIK. Switching which data
format you save to is simply done through the Open Ephys
GUI by selecting one of the previously listed formats from
a drop down box at the above toolbar. For the purpose of
description below, we chose the Matlab compatible Open
Ephys format and describe how to convert to a Matlab read-
able le. The Open Ephys les types are .continuous, which
saves continuous electrophysiology data, .events, which
saves digital events, and .spikes, which saves spike sorting
events. Each data type can be converted to Matlab, but for EEG
purposes we focus on the .continuous data type, as it will
provide us the EEG traces for each recorded channel. In order
to convert .continuous les to use in Matlab, an Open Ephys
analysis toolbox, available for free online (https://github.com/
open-ephys/analysis-tools), must be used. Once downloaded,
Matlab can be used to easily convert the .continuous data
type to the .mat format, as shown by the code below:
Figure 4. Open Ephys GUI; example recording setup. (a) List of processors that can be dragged and dropped into the (b) signal chain.
(c)The Rhythm FPGA initializes the Acquisition Board and opens up communication for data to be sent along the signal chain.
(d) A bandpass lter lters the data within any prescribed range. (e) The LFP Viewer allows for visualization of incoming data. (f) Data is
easily saved by clicking on the drop down button and entering in the relevant information.
Figure 5. Schematic of standard 1020 electrode cap layout.
Recording electrodes Pz and C3 (light green) used for analysis in
sections4.1 and 4.2, reference electrode (light blue), and ground
electrode (light grey).
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
8
The function load_open_ephys_data, from the Open
Ephys analysis toolbox, essentially parses and translates
the custom .continuous le type. The input of the func-
tion is the lename in a string, and it will return double-
precision oating-point values of the data for that channel,
stored in micro volts, and the timestamps, stored in ms.
Information regarding events, such as timing and the digital
channel that the event occurred on during the recording, is
also obtained. This is stored in the form of a Matlab struc-
ture that contains information such as the data format used,
the sampling rate of the recording, the channel number, the
buffer size, and the event channels along with their corre-
sponding timestamps.
This conversion is useful when analysing data with custom
Matlab scripts. However, in the data analysis described in
the next section, we have also used the open-source Matlab
toolbox EEGLAB (Delorme and Makeig 2004), available for
download at http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/. In order to import
data into EEGLAB, it is necessary to rst concatenate all of
the data into a single matrix:
% Converting 32 channels of data from '.continuous' to '.mat'
for ch = 1:32
[data, timestamps, info] =
load_open_ephys_data(['100_CH',num2str(ch),'.continuous']);
save(['ch',num2str(ch),'.mat'],'data','timestamps', 'info');
end
Loading data into EEGLAB then requires knowledge of
the sampling rate and the number of channels loaded. While
this is one example, the exibility of Open Ephys data ena-
bles use for any number of analysis software or toolboxes.
There are many other open-source software packages that can
be used to analyse EEG data, see also MNE at http://martinos.
org/mne/stable/index.html, but for simplicity we have focused
on EEGLAB.
3.2. Noise reduction
Environmental noise is always an issue with electrical
recording methods, and human EEG is no exception. Variations
or errors in improper grounding, capacitive coupling of par-
ticipants to the mains supply, and AC devices all contribute to
overall noise registered in human EEG (Ferree etal 2001). As
the Open Ephys + EEG system is not immune to noise, here,
we describe observed noise and means of reduction applied to
the data collection in section4.
Many electrophysiological recordings, including EEG,
contain what is referred to as line noise, which is noise gen-
erated from the power lines and depending on the country,
is either 50 or 60 Hz. While line noise is outside of the fre-
quency bands of interest for many EEG applications, it is
best to reduce line noise as much as possible (Ferree et al
2001). Electronically, noise can be reduced by appropriate
implementation of recording ampliers. Intan amplier chips
make use of unipolar differential recording, meaning that the
incoming signal from each electrode is compared against a
common reference. This common-reference has a much lower
impedance than the input impedance for each signal electrode
(Technologies I 2013), and therefore produces a large noise
signal (Winter and Webster 1983). By tying the true common-
reference, i.e. the ground, to the current reference, the noise
in the signal path was compared to the ground signal, which
was also contaminated with the same noise (Light etal 2010),
and hence removed. Additionally, impedance measurements
were taken throughout EEG application to assure there was
no impedance mismatch across electrode channels, as this can
introduce noise.
Ground loops can also provide a source of noise to the
recording system. Electrical devices generate a leak current to
the ground that causes small differences between the ground
at different points (Tyner et al 1983). Removing any devices
connected to ground will drive down leakage currents that
produce noise within the ground.
Finally, all of our recordings were conducted inside a shielded
room. A shielded room serves as a measure to absorb external
electromagnetic interference, prohibiting our system from
picking up the noise outside the room. As with all EEG systems,
even with proper referencing, grounding, and shielding, 60 Hz
noise from the mains supply may still persist. This is because
capacitive coupling between the participant and any nearby power
lines still exists (Ebner etal 1999). Therefore, raw data traces will
still exhibit a 60 Hz interference (i.e. line noise), albeit reduced
in magnitude. To remedy this, it is standard practice is to apply a
digital 60 Hz notch lter after data acquisition (Ferree etal 2001),
to suppress the remaining 60 Hz noise can be suppressed.
% Concatenating data into a single '.mat' le for use with EEGLAB
all_channels = [];
for ch = 1:32
load(['ch',num2str(ch),'.mat'], ‘data’);
all_channels(:,ch) = data;
end
save(‘all_eeg.mat’, ‘all_channels’);
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
9
4. Examples
In this section, we present three examples of commonly
recorded EEG signals (low frequency rhythms, sensory
evoked responses, and EMG activity) obtained with the Open
Ephys + EEG system. EEG was recorded with a commer-
cially available electrode cap from Brainvision, using the stan-
dard 1020 system (gure 5). In each example, data analysis
was conducted with Matlab using either custom scripts or the
open source Matlab toolbox, EEGLab (Delorme and Makeig
2004). Raw data was down sampled to 250 S/s, to reduce com-
putational burden, and then visually inspected to remove any
large magnitude noise. Data was then band-pass ltered from
0.1 to 100 Hz and notch ltered at 60 Hz to remove line noise.
Plotted ERPs received an additional low-pass 40 Hz lter for
the sole purpose of visualization of lower frequency content
of the ERP, such as the P300 (Ai and Ro 2014). Depending
on the data in question, one may not desire to use a 40 Hz
low-pass lter, in the event that there is meaningful activity at
higher frequencies. After ltering, we removed uncharacter-
istic large amplitude (>100 µV) signals. All EEG data under-
went independent component analysis (ICA)-based artifact
rejection using the FastICA algorithm (Vigário et al 2000).
As each EEG electrode recording is the mixed signal of a sum
of neural sources, ICA separates the mixed signals into their
individual components (sources) along with their respective
weights. The components attributed to muscle, cardiac, and
eye blink artifacts were visually identied and were weighted
Figure 6. Occipital alpha band activity from three different subjects, (a)(c) taken from the Pz electrode during an alert (eyes open) and a
rest (eyes closed) state. The top left plot for (a)(c) are the raw, unltered voltage traces of the transition state for eyes closed to eyes open
(denoted by the dotted black line). The bottom left plot for (a)(c) are the ltered voltage traces (0.1100 Hz band-pass, 60 Hz notch) that
show a slight reduction in power, but still strong presence of alpha band activity. Finally, the right plot for (a)(c) show the power spectral
density plots of eyes open (dotted grey line) and eyes closed (solid black line) states. There is a prevalent alpha peak (around 10 Hz) for
each individual in the eyes closed state, and a strong reduction in alpha power in the eyes open state.
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
10
to zero. More information about the FastICA algorithm, along
with a free downloadable MATLAB software package can be
found at Aalto Universitys Deparment of Computer Science
(https://research.ics.aalto./ica/fastica/).
4.1. Example of stable spontaneous low frequency rhythms:
eyes-closed alpha (714 Hz)
Monitoring changes in EEG from a relaxed eyes-closed state
to a focused eyes-open state generated robust changes in alpha
band (714 Hz) activity over occipital cortex (gure 6), con-
sistent with many prior EEG studies (Berger 1935). The data
shown in gure5 was collected while participants sat comfort-
ably in a chair and stared at a xation point. An auditory cue
was given every 10 s instructing the participant to either open,
or close their eyes. During this time, EEG was recorded using
the EEG Breakout Board and a standard, commercially available
electrode cap from Brainvision. Raw (gure 6(a)) and ltered
(gure 6(b)) traces from electrode Pz (gure 5) showed increased
magnitude in oscillatory alpha band activity during eyes closed
epochs as compared to eyes open epochs. Additionally, power
spectral density (PSD) calculation of one epoch (10 s) of eyes
closed (gure 6(c), solid black traces) and eyes open (gure 6(c),
dotted grey traces) from the Pz electrode shows an increase in
power in the alpha band for the eyes closed state.
We compared recordings from the Open Ephys + EEG
system to a standard Brainvision actiCHamp EEG system,
during the eyes-open eyes-closed task described above using
the same Brainvision actiCap (gure 7). First, the partici-
pant, whose data is shown in gure7, performed the task with
the Open Ephys + EEG system and was then switched to
theBrainvision actiCHamp system. During the entirety of the
recordings, the EEG cap was not removed and the participant
remained seated in the same room. Both data sets were ana-
lyzed as data from gure6; they were downsampled to 250 S/s,
bandpass ltered from 0.1 to 100 Hz and notch ltered at 60 Hz
to remove the residual line noise. Following this, ICA was per-
formed to remove eye blinks from each data set. Representative
traces from the transition of an eyes closed to an eyes open state
is shown in gure7(a) for both systems (top gure: Brainvision,
bottom gure: Open Ephys + EEG). Additionally, a PSD was
calculated over the 28 s (6 s) mark for each eyes closed epoch
of both systems. The PSDs for each epoch were averaged for
each system (gure 7(b)). Qualitatively, both average PSDs
provide similar results, with a peak at 11 Hz for this subject.
The only difference between the two systems is the low fre-
quency region comp onent of the pink, or 1/f, noise at 01 Hz.
This was anticipated since the Open Ephys + EEG system
uses an AC amplier, while the Brainvision system uses a DC
amplier (see section 1.1). Quantitatively, the average alpha
band power for the Brainvision system was 14.84 ± 1.44 (µV2
Hz1) and the average power for the Open Ephys + EEG
system was 14.93 ± 0.94 (µV2 Hz1). We also calculated the
signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio of each system by dening the
signal to be power in the 814 Hz band during eyes closed, and
the noise to be power in the 814 Hz band during eyes open.
This gave an SNR of 12.7 dB for the Brainvision system, and
13.6 dB for the Open Ephys + EEG system.
4.2. Example of sensory evoked potentials: tactile detection
Sensory evoked potentials (SEPs) shown in gure8 were gener-
ated by delivering brief taps to a subjects nger-tip during a tac-
tile detection task, as described in prior studies (Jones etal 2007).
More specically, volunteers placed the third digit of their right
hand over a custom made tactile stimulator, which delivered brief
taps to the ngertip via a plastic screw that was driven by a piezo-
electric bender. Stimuli were given as 100 Hz, 10 ms sine waves
of varying amplitude dynamically titrated to maintain stimulus
strength at perceptual threshold (50% detection). During this
Figure 7. Signal comparison between Brainvision actiCHamp system and Open Ephys + EEG system using the same Brainvision actiCap
electrode cap in recording eyes closed alpha activity. (a) Transition from eyes closed to eyes open in the (top gure) Brainvision system and
the (bottom gure) Open Ephys + EEG are very similar. (b) Average PSD of Brainvision (dotted black line) and Open Ephys + EEG (solid
blue line) for eyes closed epochs.
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
11
time, 32 channels of EEG were recorded using the EEG Breakout
Board and a BrainVision electrode cap.
Figure 8 shows grand averaged SEP data from suprath-
reshold (i.e. detected) tactile stimuli from electrode C3 (gure
5), averaged over 3 subjects (n = 78 stimuli per subject). SEPs
from perceived stimuli produced generic waveforms, con-
sistent with previously reported EEG tactile evoked responses
(Jones etal 2007, Ai and Ro 2014). A large positive deec-
tion begins at ~330500 ms post-stimulus; a two-tailed t-test
(p < 0.05) was performed to highlight the region of signi-
cance of the P300 from zero (green box gure8). The RMS
noise, taken to be the pre-stimulus time period (2000 ms),
was calculated to be 6.0117 ± 2.069 µVrms.
4.3. Example use of EEG breakout board: EMG recordings
The EEG breakout board also allows recording of additional
electrophysiology signals (see gure 2(c) for example con-
nectivity). Here, we show an example recording EMG data
(gure 9). EMG electrodes were placed on the subjects right
forearm, over the exors, with a reference electrode placed
on the wrist. Recordings were carried out with the Open
Ephys EEG Breakout Board, using the method described in
section1.1, and disposable EMG electrodes. EMG data was
monitored during periods of rest and periods of exion move-
ment of the hand and ngers. Periods of rest were marked by
stagnant, low amplitude activity, while movement was marked
by large amplitude (>0.3 mV) activity (gure 9).
5. Discussion
We have described the parts and methods necessary to
assemble a new low-cost, exible and open-source human
EEG system using the Open Ephys platform. We have also
provided details of how to analyze data from this system and
evidence that this system can produce reliable recordings of
the most commonly measured EEG signals; low frequency
rhythms and sensory evoked responses, as well as EMGs.
Figure 8. Grand average sensory evoked potential at electrode C3 (solid black) of perceived stimuli from tactile detection task. Stimulus
delivery occurs at 0 msec. Standard deviation for average of three subjects (dotted black), 78 trials each. P300 deection shown at ~400 ms
in light green (p < 0.05). A 40 Hz low-pass lter was used for visualization.
Figure 9. Example of acquired EMG data from forearm exion using Open Ephys with the EEG adaptor (gure 2). EMG electrodes were
placed on the subjects forearm with a reference on the elbow; the forearm was at rest for the rst 2 s, and then the forearm was exed from
2 to 3 s, before resting once more.
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
12
Additionally, we have shown recording efcacy in the Open
Ephys + EEG system by running a side-by-side comparison
with a commercial EEG system. Building on Open Ephys
technology, this system can help transform the applicability
of EEG to a wider user base by providing a stable and easily
assembled system at an affordable price.
5.1. Expanding the utility of Open Ephys + EEG
Due to the modular style of the Open Ephys + EEG system,
the research applications are almost endless. One prom-
ising use of EEG is for closed-loop technologies; technolo-
gies that receive feedback from an EEG signal to drive an
external device, such as a computer cursor, a wheelchair, a
robotic arm, or an electric stimulator. In order for closed-
loop technologies to work properly, they have two basic
requirements; control and speed. With Open Ephys + EEG,
signals such as ERPs or neural oscillations can be tied to
a digital output on the acquisition board to allow for inter-
facing with an external device. For example, transcranial
alternating current stimulation (tACS) has been used to
selectively modulating working memory (Jausovec and
Jausovec 2014). Our system could enable a closed-loop
design to selectively apply tACS during working memory
by, for example, recording an EEG biomarker of working
memory, such as the power of theta oscillations (Jausovec
and Jausovec 2014), and sending a digital signal or commu-
nicating over USB to an external tACS device to stimulate
only during theta activity. Signals from the tACS device can
also be sent to the Open Ephys + EEG system to allow for
syncing of external tACS events, such as the precise time of
initiation of a tACS pulse. A demonstration of closed-loop
capabilities with the Open Ephys system has already been
published in the context of triggering optogenetic stimula-
tion in mice (Siegle and Wilson 2014). Here, the Open Ephys
system was used in a closed-loop manner to trigger opto-
genetic stimulation by detecting peak theta power through
the Open Ephys GUI and in turn driving a pulse generator
to activate an LED. This setup boasted a ~20 ms loop time
for signal detection and subsequent optogenetic stimulation
(Siegle and Wilson 2014). Additionally, the Intan amplier
chips used in this system have a fast settle function that
blanks the electric history of the recording ampliers within
a few hundred microseconds (Technologies I 2013). This
is highly applicable in closed-loop devices since quickly
turning on and off the ampliers can eliminate high voltage
transients stemming from environmental noise, accompa-
nying devices, or direct electrical excitation of electrodes,
enabling immediate, reliable neural recordings.
The use of EEG as a clinical tool is invaluable. EEG is used
not only as a diagnostic measure (e.g. monitoring epileptic
activity) but it is also utilized as a therapeutic tool (e.g. man-
aging ADHD with neurofeedback). Unfortunately, the high-
cost of commercially available EEG systems, as well as the
technical bar for self-use, makes it impractical for individuals
to have EEG in their home. However, the low price and high
customizability of Open Ephys + EEG advances the possible
application to affordable home use. As such, patients would
not need to commute to a hospital for a neurological checkup,
and near-future therapeutics could easily be setup at a per-
sons bedside.
5.2. Current limitations and solutions
Even though there are proven benets to open-source tech-
nology and information sharing, there are also some limi-
tations. They do not provide staffed customer support for
open-source projects, service technicians who can come look
at your device if something is wrong, or paid engineers to
bring you new tools and products. With open-source tech-
nologies, the burdens of development, ingenuity, and trou-
bleshooting all fall upon the user. This can be a daunting
proposition, especially for those who are inexperienced when
it comes to electronics or coding. Therefore, open-source
technologies require a strong user base to thrive. The users
are what provide stability to the project and assurance to those
who are seeking help when developing new ideas and tools
within an open-source project space. That being said there are
many successful open-source projects in the eld of human
electrophysiology complete with a large user base that openly
shares information, reduced production cost of technology,
and a wide range of tools for generating new experimental
techniques and testing novel hypothesis; and Open Ephys
strives to these ideals. Currently, Open Ephys is being used
in over 70 labs throughout the world. The community shares
a variety of tools, both hardware and software, across multiple
platforms; provides comprehensive user documentation on a
dedicated wiki, and design documents and code on github;
and posts discussions on a google groups based forum. There
is even have a small webstore where hardware tools can be
purchased. The Open Ephys system is heavily designed with
expansion in mind, and comes ready to use with other open-
source products such as RTXI, a software interface for real-
time data acquisition and control, and Pulse Pal, a hardware
precision tool for controlling stimuli (Lin etal 2010, Sanders
and Kepecs 2014, Siegle etal 2015).
While the system described has proven to be efcacious in
recording common human neural signals, there are some lim-
itations. First, our system is completely tethered; meaning,
the electrode cap attached to the patient is connected directly
to the acquisition board and the computer. This makes the
use for the system impractical in recording EEG during
more complex behaviors involving movement, or longer-
term recordings. To address this issue, our system could be
easily adapted to wireless recording, which would provide an
ideal method of data transfer in running untethered experi-
ments. Schematics and documentation are provided for all
hardware and software of this system, therefore creating a
wireless connection for EEG use on Open Ephys would be
simple to develop, troubleshoot, and implement. Fortunately,
the data requirements necessary for EEG recordings are rela-
tively low if you keep at a reasonable sampling rate. Since the
Intan amplier chips have 16-bit ADC resolution, recording
32 channels of EEG at 1 kS s1 requires a data transfer rate
of 512 kbps. While such a data rate could be handled with
a wi- or even a Bluetooth link, adding more channels or
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
13
making wireless connectivity compatible for different modes
of recordings will inevitably lead to larger data rates that
might be difcult to maintain.
Second, while our Open Ephys + EEG design (gure
1) fosters the ability to freely connect with an Open Ephys
compatible headstage allowing versatility to move between
recording from humans to animals, it also leaves the head-
stages, and therefore the ampliers, exposed with little pro-
tection and therefore subject to break. One way around this
would be to place the Intan amplier chips directly onto the
EEG breakout board. This would get rid of the need for a head-
stage, increase the stability of the ampliers, and reduce the
chances of damage. Such a modication would be straight-
forward and could be done easily in-house, and if the number
of Open Ephys + EEG users increases it could become com-
mercially available.
Third, our system currently only supports certain commer-
cially available electrode caps due to the fact that it uses spe-
cic connector types that are not universally used by all EEG
electrode caps. However, our methods can be easily expanded
to use other electrode caps. Developing a custom EEG adaptor
for a cap type that is not currently supported only requires
knowledge of the electrode cap pinout, i.e. what electrodes
correspond to what pin in the connector. Once that informa-
tion is obtained, a PCB can be fabricated that receives signals
from the electrode cap and sends them to necessary connec-
tors for the Open Ephys system.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Open Ephys community for not only
developing high-quality, open-source tools, but also for fos-
tering discussion and aiding in trouble-shooting. We would
also like to thank Reid Harrison and Intan technologies.
Work and writing were supported by the National Institutes
of Mental Health (R01MH106174), the Brown Institute for
Brain Sciences and the Norman Prince Neurosciences Insti-
tute. This material is based upon work supported in part by
the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Admin-
istration, Ofce of Research and Development, Rehabilita-
tion Research and Development Service, Project N9228-C.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors
and do not necessarily reect the position or policy of
the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States
government.
References
AbtahiF, AslamyB, BoujabirI, SeoaneF and LindecrantzK 2015
An affordable ECG and respiration monitoring system based
on raspberry PI and ADAS1000: rst step towards homecare
applications IFMBE Proc. vol 48 pp 58
AiL and RoT 2014 The phase of prestimulus alpha oscillations
affects tactile perception J. Neurophysiol. 11113007
BakerSN, GabrielC and LemonRN 2003 EEG oscillations at 600
Hz are macroscopic markers for cortical spike bursts J. Physiol.
55052934
BergerH 1935 Das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen
Naturwissenschaften 231214
DelormeA and MakeigS 2004 EEGLAB: an open source toolbox
for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent
component analysis J. Neurosci. Methods 134921
EbnerA, SciarrettaG, EpsteinC and NuwerM 1999 EEG
instrumentation. The International Federation of Clinical
Neurophysiology Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.
52710
FarwellLA and DonchinE 1988 Talking off the top of your
head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain
potentials Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 7051023
FerreeTC, LuuP, RussellGS and TuckerDM 2001 Scalp
electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality Clin.
Neurophysiol. 11253644
GotmanJ 1982 Automatic recognition of epileptic seizures in the
EEG Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 5453040
GrayCM, MaldonadoPE, WilsonM and McNaughtonB 1995
Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple
single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate
cortex J. Neurosci. Methods 634354
GugerC, HarkamW, HertnaesC and PfurtschellerG 1999
Prosthetic control by an EEG-based brain-computer interface
(BCI) European Conf. for the Advancement of Assistive
Technology pp 16
HelfrichRF, SchneiderTR, RachS, Trautmann-LengsfeldSA,
EngelAK and HerrmannCS 2014 Entrainment of brain
oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation
Curr.Biol. 24 3339
JausovecN and JausovecK 2014 Increasing working memory
capacity with theta transcranial alternating current stimulation
(tACS) Biol. Psychol. 96427
JonesSR, PritchettDL, StufebeamSM, HamalainenM and
MooreCI 2007 Neural correlates of tactile detection: a
combined magnetoencephalography and biophysically based
computational modeling study J. Neurosci. 271075164
KlimeschW 1999 EEG alpha and theta oscillations reect cognitive
and memory performance: a review and analysis Brain Res.
Re v. 2916995
LeeV etal 2012 A mixed-signal EEG interface circuit for use in
rst year electronics courses ISCAS 20122012 IEEE Int.
Symp. on Circuits and Systems (IEEE) pp 268992
LightGA, WilliamsLE, MinowF, SprockJ, RisslingA, SharpR,
SwerdlowNR and BraffDL 2010 Electroencephalography
(EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) with human
participants Current Protocols in Neuroscience (http://doi.
org/10.1002/0471142301.ns0625s52)
LinRJ, BettencourtJ, WhiteJA, ChristiniDJ and ButeraRJ
2010 Real-time experiment interface for biological control
applications 2010 Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in
Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC10 (IEEE) vol 2010 pp
41603
MarshallL, HelgadóttirH, MölleM and BornJ 2006 Boosting slow
oscillations during sleep potentiates memory Nature 4446103
NunezP and SrinivasanR 2006 Electric Fields of the Brain: the
Neurophysics of EEG (New York: Oxford University Press)
PiipponenK, VäT, SepponenR and EskelinenP 2007 A biosignal
instrumentation system using capacitive coupling for power
and signal isolation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 5418228
RenardY, LotteF, GibertG, CongedoM, MabyE, DelannoyV,
BertrandO and LécuyerA 2010 OpenViBE: an open-source
software platform to design, test, and use brain-computer
interfaces in real and virtual environments Neural Computation
19 3553
SandersJI and KepecsA 2014 A low-cost programmable pulse
generator for physiology and behavior Front. Neuroeng. 743
SchalkG, McFarlandDJ, HinterbergerT, BirbaumerN and
WolpawJR 2004 BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer
interface (BCI) system IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51103443
Shein-IdelsonM, OndracekJM, LiawH-P, ReiterS and LaurentG
2016 Slow waves, sharp waves, ripples, and REM in sleeping
dragons Science 3525905
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
C Black etal
14
SiegleJH, HaleGJ, NewmanJP and VoigtsJ 2015 Neural
ensemble communities: open-source approaches to hardware
for large-scale electrophysiology Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 32
5359
SiegleJH and WilsonMA 2014 Enhancement of encoding
and retrieval functions through theta phase-specic
manipulation of hippocampus eLife (http://doi.org/10.7554/
eLife.03061.001)
SoikkeliR, PartanenJ, SoininenH, PääkkönenA and
RiekkinenP 1991 Slowing of EEG in Parkinsons disease
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 7915965
TallgrenP 2006 DC-EEG for Routine Clinical Use: Methods and
Clinical Impact Retrieved from www.tkk.
Technologies I 2013 RHD2000 series digital electrophysiology
interface chips RHD2216 RHD2132 digital electrophysiology
interface chips
TynerFS, KnottJR and MyerB 1983 Fundamentals of
EEG Technology: Basic Concepts and Methods 83rd edn
(Philadelphia, PA: Raven Press)
VanhataloS, PalvaJM, HolmesMD, MillerJW, VoipioJ and
KailaK 2004 Infraslow oscillations modulate excitability and
interictal epileptic activity in the human cortex during sleep
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10150537
Vig árioR, SäreläJ, JousmäkiV, HämäläinenM and OjaE 2000
Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and
MEG recordings IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47 58993
WebsterJ 2009 Medical Instrumentation Application and Design
4th edn (New York: Wiley)
WinterBB and WebsterJG 1983 Reductionl of interference due to
common mode voltage in biopotential ampliers IEEE Trans.
Biomed. Eng. pp 5862
WolpawJR, McFarlandDJ, NeatGW and FornerisCA 1991
An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control
Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 782529
WordenMS, FoxeJJ, WangN and SimpsonGV 2000
Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by
retinotopically specic alpha-band electroencephalography
increases over occipital cortex J. Neurosci. 20RC63
J. Neural Eng. 14 (20 17) 035002
... However, the effectiveness of occlusion therapy is limited by poor compliance, variable recovery outcomes, and a significant risk of recurrence. Additionally, occlusion therapy is largely ineffective if it is initiated after age 10 (DeSantis, 2014) or, in the case of deprivation amblyopia caused by congenital cataract, after the first year of life (Birch and Stager, 1996). The need for improved treatments for amblyopia is widely acknowledged (Falcone et al., 2021;Quinlan and Lukasiewicz, 2018). ...
... In animals, long-term MD models the cause of the most severe form of human amblyopia, for which treatment options are absent or limited. Traditional therapies, such as patching the fellow eye, are beneficial only when initiated at very young ages (Birch and Stager, 1996). Even when patching is initially successful, recurrence of amblyopia is common (Bhola et al., 2006;Holmes et al., 2004). ...
... Hz). Parallel analysis of EEG data was performed using the EEGLab and ERPLab toolboxes for MATLAB (Black et al., 2017;Delorme and Makeig, 2004;Lopez-Calderon and Luck, 2014). The data was bandpass filtered, segmented, and normalized for extracting event-related potentials for time-domain VEP analysis. ...
Article
Full-text available
Monocular deprivation early in development causes amblyopia, a severe visual impairment. Prognosis is poor if therapy is initiated after an early critical period. However, clinical observations have shown that recovery from amblyopia can occur later in life when the non-deprived (fellow) eye is removed. The traditional interpretation of this finding is that vision is improved simply by the elimination of interocular suppression in primary visual cortex, revealing responses to previously subthreshold input. However, an alternative explanation is that silencing activity in the fellow eye establishes conditions in visual cortex that enable the weak connections from the amblyopic eye to gain strength, in which case the recovery would persist even if vision is restored in the fellow eye. Consistent with this idea, we show here in cats and mice that temporary inactivation of the fellow eye is sufficient to promote a full and enduring recovery from amblyopia at ages when conventional treatments fail. Thus, connections serving the amblyopic eye are capable of substantial plasticity beyond the critical period, and this potential is unleashed by reversibly silencing the fellow eye.
... Our platform hosts MEA chips entailing up to 512 electrodes, manufactured in standard cleanroom facilities via maskless photolithography and varying in size, spatial topology and transparency depending on the application. These chips are matched to swappable, custom printed circuit boards (PCBs) relaying neural signals to Open Ephys [33] or Intan terminals [34] for signal acquisition and subsequent downstream processing. Our system seamlessly integrates with both electrical and optical stimulation modules, as well as other add-ons such as fluidic interfaces or tissue-specific positioning apparatuses. ...
Article
Full-text available
Motivated by the unexplored potential of in vitro neural systems for computing and by the corresponding need of versatile, scalable interfaces for multimodal interaction, an accurate, modular, fully customizable, and portable recording/stimulation solution that can be easily fabricated, robustly operated, and broadly disseminated is presented. This approach entails a reconfigurable platform that works across multiple industry standards and that enables a complete signal chain, from neural substrates sampled through micro‐electrode arrays (MEAs) to data acquisition, downstream analysis, and cloud storage. Built‐in modularity supports the seamless integration of electrical/optical stimulation and fluidic interfaces. Custom MEA fabrication leverages maskless photolithography, favoring the rapid prototyping of a variety of configurations, spatial topologies, and constitutive materials. Through a dedicated analysis and management software suite, the utility and robustness of this system are demonstrated across neural cultures and applications, including embryonic stem cell‐derived and primary neurons, organotypic brain slices, 3D engineered tissue mimics, concurrent calcium imaging, and long‐term recording. Overall, this technology, termed “mind in vitro” to underscore the computing inspiration, provides an end‐to‐end solution that can be widely deployed due to its affordable (>10× cost reduction) and open‐source nature, catering to the expanding needs of both conventional and unconventional electrophysiology.
... Electrode contacts were spaced 20 μm horizontally and 25 μm vertically in three columns, collectively spanning 1.05 mm of cortex. Data were amplified (RHD 128-channel headstage, Intan Technologies), digitized at 30 kHz (Open Ephys (Black et al., 2017 )) and saved to disk for offline analysis. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Categorical sensory representations are critical for many behaviors, including speech perception. In the auditory system, categorical information is thought to arise hierarchically, becoming increasingly prominent in higher order cortical regions. The neural mechanisms that support this robust and flexible computation remain poorly understood. Here, we studied sound representations in primary and non-primary auditory cortex while animals engaged in a challenging sound discrimination task. Population-level decoding of simultaneously recorded single neurons revealed that task engagement caused categorical sound representations to emerge in non-primary auditory cortex. In primary auditory cortex, task engagement caused a general enhancement of sound decoding that was not specific to task-relevant categories. These findings are consistent with mixed selectivity models of neural disentanglement, in which early sensory regions build an overcomplete representation of the world and allow neurons in downstream brain regions to flexibly and selectively read out behaviorally relevant, categorical information.
... Briefly, the mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, and stainless-steel screws and wires were surgically implanted in the skull and the trapezius muscle, respectively. These served as electrodes and were connected to a microtip amplifier (Intan, RHD2216, 16-channel amplifier chip with bipolar inputs (Los Angeles, CA, USA), and an Open Ephys acquisition board for recording [20]. All data were recorded at least one week after the electrode implant surgery. ...
Article
Full-text available
Sleep-stage classification is essential for sleep research. Various automatic judgment programs, including deep learning algorithms using artificial intelligence (AI), have been developed, but have limitations with regard to data format compatibility, human interpretability, cost, and technical requirements. We developed a novel program called GI-SleepNet, generative adversarial network (GAN)-assisted image-based sleep staging for mice that is accurate, versatile, compact, and easy to use. In this program, electroencephalogram and electromyography data are first visualized as images, and then classified into three stages (wake, NREM, and REM) by a supervised image learning algorithm. To increase its accuracy, we adopted GAN and artificially generated fake REM sleep data to equalize the number of stages. This resulted in improved accuracy, and as little as one mouse’s data yielded significant accuracy. Due to its image-based nature, the program is easy to apply to data of different formats, different species of animals, and even outside sleep research. Image data can be easily understood; thus, confirmation by experts is easily obtained, even when there are prediction anomalies. As deep learning in image processing is one of the leading fields in AI, numerous algorithms are also available.
Article
Full-text available
Categorical sensory representations are critical for many behaviors, including speech perception. In the auditory system, categorical information is thought to arise hierarchically, becoming increasingly prominent in higher-order cortical regions. The neural mechanisms that support this robust and flexible computation remain poorly understood. Here, we studied sound representations in the ferret primary and non-primary auditory cortex while animals engaged in a challenging sound discrimination task. Population-level decoding of simultaneously recorded single neurons revealed that task engagement caused categorical sound representations to emerge in non-primary auditory cortex. In primary auditory cortex, task engagement caused a general enhancement of sound decoding that was not specific to task-relevant categories. These findings are consistent with mixed selectivity models of neural disentanglement, in which early sensory regions build an overcomplete representation of the world and allow neurons in downstream brain regions to flexibly and selectively read out behaviorally relevant, categorical information.
Article
Full-text available
Robotic surgery represents a milestone in surgical procedures, offering advantages such as less invasive methods, elimination of tremors, scaled motion, and 3D visualization. This in-depth analysis explores the complex biochemical effects of robotic methods. The use of pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning can decrease pulmonary compliance and splanchnic perfusion while increasing hypercarbia. However, robotic surgery reduces surgical stress and inflammation by minimizing tissue trauma. This contributes to faster recovery but may limit immune function. Robotic procedures also limit ischemia–reperfusion injury and oxidative damage compared to open surgery. They also help preserve native antioxidant defenses and coagulation. In a clinical setting, robotic procedures reduce blood loss, pain, complications, and length of stay compared to traditional procedures. However, risks remain, including device failure, the need for conversion to open surgery and increased costs. On the oncology side, there is still debate about margins, recurrence, and long-term survival. The advent of advanced technologies, such as intraoperative biosensors, localized drug delivery systems, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence, may further improve the efficiency of robotic surgery. However, ethical dilemmas regarding patient consent, privacy, access, and regulation of this disruptive innovation need to be addressed. Overall, this review sheds light on the complex biochemical implications of robotic surgery and highlights areas that require additional mechanistic investigation. It presents a comprehensive approach to responsibly maximize the potential of robotic surgery to improve patient outcomes, integrating technical skill with careful consideration of physiological and ethical issues.
Article
Working under fatigue states is not only inefficient but also brings a series of safety concerns and health problems. This paper presents a novel fatigue detection algorithm based on facial multi-feature fusion, exhibiting promising properties of immediacy and accuracy. Following the video processing of marking the gray image frames and the histogram equalization using the Dlib toolkit, the facial features are extracted based on the facial marker points and then evaluated to obtain the eye aspect ratio (EAR), mouth aspect ratio (MAR), and head Euler angles (HEA) in real-time. These evaluation indexes can further contribute to calculating blinking frequency (BF), percentage of eyelid closure over the pupil over time (PERCLOS), yawning frequency (YF), and nodding frequency (NF), of which the four parameters are normalized to establish the detection model, showing the capability of identifying the fatigue grade with high accuracy and quick response. The actual test verifies the algorithm’s reliability, and the results show that the accuracy of detecting the fatigue behaviors reaches more than 94.4%, and the final judgment perfectly matches the actual physiological state on the basis of ensuring the real-time performance of the detection.
Article
Full-text available
Experiments employing chronic monitoring of neurophysiological signals and video are commonly used in studies of epilepsy to characterize behavioral correlates of seizures. Our objective was to design a low-cost platform that enables chronic monitoring of several animals simultaneously, synchronizes bilateral local field potential (LFP) and video streams in real time, and parses recorded data into manageable file sizes. We present a hardware solution leveraging Intan and Open Ephys acquisition systems and a software solution implemented in Bonsai. The platform was tested in 48-h continuous recordings simultaneously from multiple mice (male and female) with chronic epilepsy. To enable seizure detection and scoring, we developed a graphical user interface (GUI) that reads the data produced by our workflow and allows a user with no coding expertise to analyze events. Our Bonsai workflow was designed to maximize flexibility for a wide variety of experimental applications, and our use of the Open Ephys acquisition board would allow for scaling recordings up to 128 channels per animal.Significance StatementWe present a low-cost hardware and software solution intended for multianimal chronic seizure monitoring, that prioritizes experimental freedom, and requires no coding expertise of the user. We provide details for using an Intan adapter board to enable user freedom regarding the type of electrodes used. Video and local field potential (LFP) data streams are synchronized and parsed in Bonsai - an open-source visual programming language that has prewritten libraries that allow our workflow to be adapted to other data types or to integrate with open-source toolboxes. Finally, for those intending to use our platform for seizure monitoring, we provide an accessible graphical user interface (GUI) to aid in seizure detection and behavioral scoring.
Article
Full-text available
Therapeutic strategies capable of inducing and enhancing prosthesis embodiment are a key point for better adaptation to and acceptance of prosthetic limbs. In this study, we developed a training protocol using an EMG-based human-machine interface (HMI) that was applied in the preprosthetic rehabilitation phase of people with amputation. This is a case series with the objective of evaluating the induction and enhancement of the embodiment of a virtual prosthesis. Six men and a woman with unilateral transfemoral traumatic amputation without previous use of prostheses participated in the study. Participants performed a training protocol with the EMG-based HMI, composed of six sessions held twice a week, each lasting 30 mins. This system consisted of myoelectric control of the movements of a virtual prosthesis immersed in a 3D virtual environment. Additionally, vibrotactile stimuli were provided on the participant’s back corresponding to the movements performed. Embodiment was investigated from the following set of measurements: skin conductance response (affective measurement), crossmodal congruency effect (spatial perception measurement), ability to control the virtual prosthesis (motor measurement), and reports before and after the training. The increase in the skin conductance response in conditions where the virtual prosthesis was threatened, recalibration of the peripersonal space perception identified by the crossmodal congruency effect, ability to control the virtual prosthesis, and participant reports consistently showed the induction and enhancement of virtual prosthesis embodiment. Therefore, this protocol using EMG-based HMI was shown to be a viable option to achieve and enhance the embodiment of a virtual prosthetic limb.
Article
Background Closing the loop between brain activity and behavior is one of the most active areas of development in neuroscience. There is particular interest in developing closed-loop control of neural oscillations. Many studies report correlations between oscillations and functional processes. Oscillation-informed closed-loop experiments might determine whether these relationships are causal and would provide important mechanistic insights which may lead to new therapeutic tools. These closed-loop perturbations require accurate estimates of oscillatory phase and amplitude, which are challenging to compute in real time. New Method We developed an easy to implement, fast and accurate Toolkit for Oscillatory Real-time Tracking and Estimation (TORTE). TORTE operates with the open-source Open Ephys GUI (OEGUI) system, making it immediately compatible with a wide range of acquisition systems and experimental preparations. Results TORTE efficiently extracts oscillatory phase and amplitude from a target signal and includes a variety of options to trigger closed-loop perturbations. Implementing these tools into existing experiments is easy and adds minimal latency to existing protocols. Comparison with Existing Methods Most labs use in-house lab-specific approaches, limiting replication and extension of their experiments by other groups. Accuracy of the extracted analytic signal and accuracy of oscillation-informed perturbations with TORTE match presented results by these groups. However, TORTE provides access to these tools in a flexible, easy to use toolkit without requiring proprietary software. Conclusion We hope that the availability of a high-quality, open-source, and broadly applicable toolkit will increase the number of labs able to perform oscillatory closed-loop experiments, and will improve the replicability of protocols and data across labs.
Article
Full-text available
Assessing the behavioral relevance of the hippocampal theta rhythm has proven difficult, due to a shortage of experiments that selectively manipulate phase-specific information processing. Using closed-loop stimulation, we triggered inhibition of dorsal CA1 at specific phases of the endogenous theta rhythm in freely behaving mice. This intervention enhanced performance on a spatial navigation task that requires the encoding and retrieval of information related to reward location on every trial. In agreement with prior models of hippocampal function, the behavioral effects depended on both the phase of theta and the task segment at which we stimulated. Stimulation in the encoding segment enhanced performance when inhibition was triggered by the peak of theta. Conversely, stimulation in the retrieval segment enhanced performance when inhibition was triggered by the trough of theta. These results suggest that processes related to the encoding and retrieval of task-relevant information are preferentially active at distinct phases of theta.
Article
Full-text available
The dragon sleeps tonight Most animal species sleep, from invertebrates to primates. However, neuroscientists have until now only actively recorded the sleeping brains of birds and mammals. Shein-Idelson et al. now describe the electrophysiological hallmarks of sleep in reptiles. Recordings from the brains of Australian dragons revealed the typical features of slow-wave sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. These findings indicate that the brainstem circuits responsible for slow-wave and REM sleep are not only very ancient but were already involved in sleep dynamics in reptiles. Science , this issue p. 590
Article
Full-text available
Precisely timed experimental manipulations of the brain and its sensory environment are often employed to reveal principles of brain function. While complex and reliable pulse trains for temporal stimulus control can be generated with commercial instruments, contemporary options remain expensive and proprietary. We have developed Pulse Pal, an open source device that allows users to create and trigger software-defined trains of voltage pulses with high temporal precision. Here we describe Pulse Pal's circuitry and firmware, and characterize its precision and reliability. In addition, we supply online documentation with instructions for assembling, testing and installing Pulse Pal. While the device can be operated as a stand-alone instrument, we also provide application programming interfaces in several programming languages. As an inexpensive, flexible and open solution for temporal control, we anticipate that Pulse Pal will be used to address a wide range of instrumentation timing challenges in neuroscience research.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Homecare is a potential solution for problems associated with an aging population. This may involve several physiological measurements, and hence a flexible but affordable measurement device is needed. In this work, we have designed an ADAS1000-based four-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration monitoring system. It has been implemented using Raspberry PI as a platform for homecare applications. ADuM chips based on iCoupler technology have been used to achieve electrical isolation as required by IEC 60601 and IEC 60950 for patient safety. The result proved the potential of Raspberry PI for the design of a compact, affordable, and medically safe measurement device. Further work involves developing a more flexible software for collecting measurements from different devices (measuring, e.g., blood pressure, weight, impedance spectroscopy, blood glucose) through Bluetooth or user input and integrating them into a cloud-based homecare system.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In their first electronics course, many students find operational amplifiers, analog filters and sensor interface circuitry perplexing and daunting. The purpose of this paper is to present a circuit that addresses these pitfalls. A simplified electroencephelogram (EEG) circuit that is interfaced to a digital backend is proposed. The completed circuit involves using instrumentation amplifiers and filters for the EEG interface. The digital backend helps analyze EEG data on the computer.
Article
Full-text available
Novel methods for neuronal entrainment [1-4] provide the unique opportunity to modulate perceptually relevant brain oscillations [5, 6] in a frequency-specific manner and to study their functional impact on distinct cognitive functions. Recently, evidence has emerged that tACS (transcranial alternating current stimulation) can modulate cortical oscillations [7-9]. However, the study of electrophysiological effects has been hampered so far by the absence of concurrent electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. Here, we applied 10 Hz tACS to the parieto-occipital cortex and utilized simultaneous EEG recordings to study neuronal entrainment during stimulation. We pioneer a novel approach for simultaneous tACS-EEG recordings and successfully separate stimulation artifacts from ongoing and event-related cortical activity. Our results reveal that 10 Hz tACS increases parieto-occipital alpha activity and synchronizes cortical oscillators with similar intrinsic frequencies to the entrainment frequency. Additionally, we demonstrate that tACS modulates target detection performance in a phase-dependent fashion highlighting the causal role of alpha oscillations for visual perception.
Article
Previous studies have shown that the oscillations in the 8-12 Hz range in human influence sensory perception. In the current study, we examined whether both the power and phase of these mu/alpha oscillations predict successful conscious tactile perception. Near-threshold tactile stimuli were applied to the left hand while electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was recorded over the contralateral right somatosensory cortex. We found a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between prestimulus mu/alpha power and detection rate, suggesting that there is an intermediate level of alpha power that is optimal for tactile perception. We also found a significant difference in phase angle concentration at stimulus onset that predicted whether the upcoming tactile stimulus was perceived or missed. As has been shown in the visual system, these findings suggest that these mu/alpha oscillations measured over somatosensory areas exert a strong inhibitory control on tactile perception and that pulsed inhibition by these oscillations shapes the state of brain activity necessary for conscious perception. They further suggest that these common phasic processing mechanisms across different sensory modalities and brain regions may reflect a common underlying encoding principle in perceptual processing that leads to momentary windows of perceptual awareness.