Content uploaded by Aloys Berg
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Aloys Berg on Apr 23, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
*Corresponding author email: aloys.berg@klinikum.uni-reiburg.de
Symbiosis Group
Symbiosis
www.symbiosisonline.org
www.symbiosisonlinepublishing.com
12345
6 7*
1Zentrum für Prävention und Sportmedizin, Technische Universität München, Germany
2NIHR Clinical Research Network: Diabetes, Metabolic & Endocrine and Renal Disorders, Imperial College, London
3Department of Epidemiology & Prevention, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US
4Department of Health and Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London, UK
5Institut für Bewegungs- und Arbeitsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Germany
6Department of Nutrition, Institut für Sport und Sportwissenschaft, Universität Freiburg, Germany
7Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Freiburg, Germany
Open Access
Research Article
*Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. med. Aloys Berg, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Freiburg, E-mail: aloys.berg@klinikum.uni-reiburg.de
Yrs: Years; BMI: Body Mass Index; kg/m2: Kilogram/
Meter2; LS: Lifestyle group; MR: Standardized meal replacement
group; MRPT: Standardized meal replacement accompanied by
supervised physical training; ng/ml: Nanogram/millilitre; kg:
Kilogram; h-CRP: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL6: Human
Interleukin 6; SD: standard deviations; SPSS: Analytical Software;
BW: Body Weight; G: Gramm
Obesity levels have dramatically increased in the United
States (US) and in the majority of European countries during the
past few decades [1-3]. A study in 2001 [4] revealed increases in
obesity among US adults for both sexes and across all ages, ethnic
backgrounds, educational levels and smoking levels. A chronic
imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure
appears to play a role in the development of obesity [5, 6].
Serum leptin levels may have a potential role in the prediction
of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance [7]. Serum leptin
through lifestyle changes in overweight adults [8, 9]. Leptin, as a
circulating adipokine, is a regulatory factor for food intake, energy
expenditure and body fat distribution. Leptin also participates
in a signalling system regulating the amount of adipose energy
stored in the brain [5]. In addition, leptin resistance may be
responsible, in part, for the development of obesity among the
aging population [10].
Appropriate intervention strategies to reverse body weight
gain and elevated body fat, respectively, are still a matter of
debate because additional metabolic and endocrine effects may
[11]. According to several studies, a high-protein, low-glycaemic
The increasing prevalence of
overweight and obese adults warrants improved dietary strategies
for weight management and metabolic control. Hence, the objective
of this study was to investigate the effects of a high-protein diet on
leptin regulation.
This study was a secondary analysis of data collected
from a randomized controlled trial, conducted in 90 overweight adults
(age: 47.5 ± 7.5 yrs.; BMI: 31.5 ± 2.3 kg/m2) who were followed over
weight loss and intervention type. Participants were randomized
into 3 interventions groups: 1) therapeutic lifestyle changes, (LS);
2) standardized meal replacement (Almased®) (MR); and 3)
standardized meal replacement accompanied by supervised physical
training (MRPT). For the analyses, both diet groups (MR, MRPT) were
pooled into one common group and compared to the LS group in a
parallel two-group study design with endpoint assessment after 24
weeks of intervention.
In total, 83 participants completed the 24-week study.
regulation occurred in all intervention participants regardless of
their group assignment (LS; MR, MRPT). Participants’ consumption
effect on serum leptin levels (-15.5 ± 7.5 and -12.5 ± 7.8 vs. -8.7 ± 6.1
ng/ml). Greater body weight reductions were also observed in the
diet groups (-8.9 ± 3.9 kg) compared to the LS group (-6.2 ± 4.2 kg).
Conclusions
Leptin; Meal Replacement; Energy Metabolism; High
Protein Diet; Weight Regulation;
Page 2 of 5
Koohkan S, Golesorkhi M, Vitolins MZ, McCarthy DH, Berg A, et al. (2016) The Influence of a Meal Replacement
Formula on Leptin Regulation in Obese Adults. J Nutrition Health Food Sci 4(4): 1-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15226/
jnhfs.2016.00169
©
13]. For this reason, a subgroup analysis was performed on the
data collected from an intervention study to examine the effects
of a protein-rich meal replacement on the body composition and
metabolic conditions of overweight adults.
For the secondary data analyses, we used data collected from
a randomized controlled three-arm study including 90 men and
women. All volunteers were overweight middle-aged adults
(31.5 ± 2.3 kg/m2; 47.5 ± 7.5 yrs.); non-smokers; free from known
food allergies, metabolic diseases; and none regularly used any
medications.
For the main trial, participants were randomized into 3
intervention groups: 1) therapeutic lifestyle changes: LS; 2)
standardized meal replacement (Almased ®), MR; and 3)
standardized meal replacement accompanied with supervised
exercise/physical training (MRPT). All participants completed
a comprehensive medical examination before and after the
intervention, including body composition analysis by air
displacement plethysmography (Bod Pod®) [14] and laboratory
investigations, i.e., blood glucose, insulin, plasma lipids,
For this investigation, we analysed leptin and insulin
changes to determine the effects of age, gender, baseline level,
weight loss, and intervention type. In this analysis, the effects
of the therapeutic lifestyle vs. diet with and without supervised
exercise interventions on the selected laboratory criteria were
evaluated. We also evaluated the change from baseline to the end
of intervention at the 24-week visit.
All volunteers were interviewed and screened before
participating in this study at the Department of Sports Medicine
of the Freiburg University hospital. The study was conducted
in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. All
procedures involving human subjects were approved by the
Ethics Commission of Freiburg University (EK-Freiburg No.
230/01) and registered as a controlled clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.
informed consent. The clinical trial was designed and performed
according to an approved, published protocol [11].
For the secondary data analysis, both meal replacement
groups were merged into a single group (MR/MRPT) due to the
similarity of their outcomes (Table 1). The meal replacement
groups were compared to the lifestyle group (LS) in a parallel
two-group evaluation. The endpoint assessment occurred 24
weeks after the interventions.
The results are expressed as the means ± Standard Deviations
[SD] for all parameters. Descriptive, multivariable analyses were
performed to evaluate the changes from baseline using the exact
Mann-Whitney test and the ANOVA test. For each participant,
complete data sets were available in Microsoft® Excel XP
All analyses were performed using SPSS version 18.02.
and MRPT (p > 0.1) (Table 1).
Therefore, for this secondary data analysis, both
meal replacement groups using the meal replacement
formula were merged into a single group (MR/MRPT)
and compared to the lifestyle group (LS) with endpoint
assessment after 24 weeks of intervention (Table 2).
At baseline, all demographic, clinical and laboratory variables
were not different between groups. Independent of the
intervention (LS vs. MR/MRPT), the 83 patients who completed
and metabolic regulation (Table 2). The MR and MRPT groups
experienced changes in body weight (BW -8.9 ± 3.9 kg)
reductions compared to the LS group (-6.2 ± 4.2 kg).
mass, serum leptin levels, and insulin between the interventions
(Table 2). Even after adjusting for weight loss differences,
reductions in serum leptin levels (-13.9 ng/ml) compared with
participants in the LS group (-9.8 ng/ml) post-intervention. This
effect was not observed for insulin.
In this study, we compared the effects of different weight-
management interventions, including therapeutic lifestyle
changes and the use of a meal replacement product with or
without supervised exercise training. Overall weight and fat
This group also demonstrated greater improvements in blood
markers of metabolic health.
yoghurt-honey-based meal replacement product (Almased®) on
weight reduction and the regulation of insulin and leptin [11].
According to this randomized controlled trial, insulin and leptin
levels decreased more in participants using the meal replacement
compared to participants receiving lifestyle group counselling.
In the current study, we conducted a secondary analysis of the
formula on reductions in leptin and insulin levels. These results
When the leptin results were adjusted for age, gender,
baseline leptin level, body weight change, and intervention
type (LS vs. MR/MRPT), the meal replacement approach
clearly had an independent effect on plasma leptin levels and
improved the effects on leptin reduction caused by weight loss.
Therefore, the results suggest a relationship between protein
intake and leptin regulation in the overweight adults examined.
Several studies have demonstrated that an increase in the
Page 3 of 5
Koohkan S, Golesorkhi M, Vitolins MZ, McCarthy DH, Berg A, et al. (2016) The Influence of a Meal Replacement
Formula on Leptin Regulation in Obese Adults. J Nutrition Health Food Sci 4(4): 1-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15226/
jnhfs.2016.00169
©
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 225 ±30.4 196±23.1 0.000 221±34.8 198±32.6 0.000 0.396
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 59±14.1 52±10.4 0.003 59±14.0 54±15.6 0.002 0.763
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) 128±25.6 114±15.2 0.003 127±29.2 112±26.3 0.000 0.897
Apo B (mg/dl) 119±20.9 101±16.2 0.000 115±27.4 92.5±25.5 0.000 0.085
Leptin (ng/dl) 37.9±26.7 22.5±13.9 0.000 33.9±24.2 21.3±16.3 0.000 0.226
Insulin (µU/ml) 11.7±8.92 6.3±3.97 0.003 13.8±11.35 7.8±5.90 0.001 0.139
Glucose (mg/dl) 92±9.4 90.0±9.1 0.226 98±14.4 91.0±10.5 0.000 0.260
Data comparison between the MR and MRPT groups [11].
aFor changes before–after
bFor differences in changes between the groups
proportion of dietary protein from 15% to 30% of energy
intake with a constant level of carbohydrate intake produces a
sustained decrease in ad libitum energy intake, which may be
mediated by increased central nervous system leptin sensitivity
protein loss and enhancing glycaemic control [7, 11-12, 15-16].
Participants consuming a diet high in protein with a low
glycaemic index continue to lose weight after the initial weight
loss [13]. In fact, higher dietary protein intake was achieved by
reducing carbohydrate intake, which adds further support to
carbohydrate content (g) multiplied by glycaemic index) is
important for controlling body weight in obese patients [17-19].
found in soy protein isolates) may also contribute to the weight
loss produced by low-carbohydrate diets [7, 20]. Moreover, weight
loss interventions using meal replacement approaches together
with dietary counselling and increased physical activity lead
to substantial, favourable changes in both anthropometric and
metabolic risk factors, while preserving lean muscle mass [12, 21].
Recent studies have shown that meal replacement regimens are
safe and associated with greater weight loss than individualized
diet plans [22, 23]. A meal replacement regimen high in soy
protein may be more effective at improving body weight and body
composition and reducing associated cardio-metabolic risk factors,
such as insulin, leptin, endothelial function and anthropometric
measures compared to lifestyle interventions (e.g., fat restricting
low calorie diets and increased physical activity) [11, 24, 25].
(compared to baseline). As a soy and milk protein-based product,
the meal replacement used in this study had an energy-sparing
Soy proteins have been noted to improve receptor-mediated
transport of insulin and leptin through the blood brain barrier
Body Weight
(kg)
91.2±11.6 90.2±11.3 84.9±10.8
c / y
81.8±11.7
c / y
Fat Mass
(kg)
36.9±6.27 36.2±6.38 30.4±7.60
c / x
26.8±7.80
c / x
Triglyceride
(mg/dl)
127±68.4 143±66.0 137±55.2
-
133±71.9
-
Apolipoprotein B
(mg/dl)
115±20.3 117±23.9 105±20.9
- /c
97±21.6
c / x
Fasting Blood
Sugar (mg/dl)
95±14.1 95±12.2 90±9.9
a / -
90±9.8
c / -
Insulin
(µU/ml)
8.8±3.92 12.7±10.1 7.4±3.98
- / y
7.1±5.02
c / y
HOMA- Index
(U)
2.2±1.26 3.1±2.65 1.7±1.00
- / y
1.6±1.17
c / y
Leptin
(ng/ml)
37±29.2 36±25.4 28±20.7
b / y
22±15.0
c / y
Interleukin-6
(pg/ml)
1.8±1.25 2.2±2.05 1.8±2.30
-
1.7±1.29
A
hs-CRP
(mg/dl)
0.27±0.22 0.30±0.28 0.23±0.16
-
0.19±0.17
C
Page 4 of 5
Koohkan S, Golesorkhi M, Vitolins MZ, McCarthy DH, Berg A, et al. (2016) The Influence of a Meal Replacement
Formula on Leptin Regulation in Obese Adults. J Nutrition Health Food Sci 4(4): 1-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15226/
jnhfs.2016.00169
©
and are responsible for an increased effect of these hormones
in the hypothalamus. This effect not only impacts appetite
regulation but may also impact peripheral insulin and leptin
resistance in obese participants [27-30]. These effects may
exhibit a variety of biological and molecular activities [20,25].
proteins important for lipid metabolism [31, 32]. The effects
of soy protein on gene expression or the regulation of nuclear
transcription factors might also, at least in part, be able to
account for the alterations observed in insulin and leptin [33,
this meal replacement product [20] may account for some of the
a reduction in body fat mass and hepatic fat accumulation, in
addition to improved fatty acid metabolism, which led to lower
insulin resistance [33].
In summary, the meal replacement strategy utilized
for weight reduction in this trial may provide therapeutic
including impaired glucose tolerance and leptin resistance.
milieus that are responsible for weight stabilization. Moreover,
the meal replacement product can safely and effectively produce
leptin.
We thank the technical staff of the Department of
Rehabilitative und Präventive Sportmedizin, Medizinische
Universitätsklinik Freiburg – renamed the Institut für
Bewegungs- und Arbeitsmedizin - for their assistance in input
operations. We also thank all general practitioners who were
engaged in supervising the lifestyle program. Last, we thank the
Almased Wellness Company (Bienenbüttel, Germany) for their
support in performing this study.
This research was funded by Almased Wellness GmbH,
Bienenbüttel, Germany. A. Berg has written “The Almased Well-
ness Concept” outlining the effects of a soy-enriched diet in ealth
and disease.
1. Andreyeva T, Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Changes in perceived weight
discrimination among Americans, 1995-1996 through 2004-2006.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16(5):1129-1134. doi: 10.1038/
oby.2008.35
2. Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD. Perceptions of weight
discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender
discrimination in America. Int J Obes. 2008;32(6):992-1000. doi:
10.1038/ijo.2008.22.
3. Nguyen DM, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of obesity. Gastroenterol
Clin North Am. 2010;39(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2009.12.014
4. Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The
continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States.
JAMA. 2001;286(10):1195-1200.
5. Jéquier E. Leptin signaling, adiposity, and energy balance. Ann N Y Acad
Sci. 2002;967:379-388.
6. Vasselli JR, Scarpace, PJ, Harris, RB, Banks WA. Dietary components in
the development of leptin resistance. Adv Nutr. 2013;4(2):164-175.
doi: 10.3945/an.112.003152
7. Weigle DS, Breen PA, Matthys CC, Callahan HS, Meeuws KE, Burden
VR, et al. A high-protein diet induces sustained reductions in appetite,
ad libitum caloric intake, and body weight despite compensatory
changes in diurnal plasma leptin and ghrelin concentrations. Am J Clin
Nutr. 2005;82(1):41-48.
8. Wang P, Holst C, Andersen MR, Astrup A, Bouwman FG, van Otterdijk S,
change after weight loss with interactions of dietary protein level and
glycemic index. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16773. doi: 10.1371/journal.
pone.0016773.
9. Crujeiras AB, Goyenechea E, Abete I, Lage M, Carreira MC, Martinez
JA, et al. Weight gain after diet induced loss is predicted by higher
baseline leptin and lower ghrelin plasma levels. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 2010;95(11):5037-5044. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2566.
10. Carter S, Caron A, Richard D, Picard F. Role of leptin resistance in
the development of obesity in older patients. Clin Interv Aging.
2013;8:829-844. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S36367.
11. Berg A, Frey I, Deibert P, Landmann U, Koenig D, Schmidt-Trucksäss A,
et al. Weight loss is possible: half-year results of a clinically controlled,
randomized intervention study with obese adults. Ernaehrungs-
Umschau 2004;28:1349-1352.
12. Deibert P, König D, Schmidt-Trucksaess A, Zaenker KS, Frey I,
Landmann U, et al. Weight loss without losing muscle mass in pre-
obese and obese subjects induced by a high-soy-protein diet. Int J Obes
Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1349-1352. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802765.
13. Larsen TM, Dalskov SM, van Baak M, Jebb SA, Papadaki A, Pfeiffer AF,
et al. Diets with high or low protein content and glycemic index for
weight-loss maintenance. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(22):2102-13. doi:
10.1056/NEJMoa1007137.
14. McCrory MA, Gomez TD, Bernauer EM, Mole PA. Evaluation of a
new air displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body
composition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27(12):1686-1691.
15.
development of satiety. Physiol Behav. 1988;42(2):145-153.
16. Deibert P, König D, Vitolins MZ, Landmann U, Frey I, Zahradnik HP,
et al. (2007). Effect of a weight loss intervention on anthropometric
measures and metabolic risk factors in pre-versus postmenopausal
women. Nutr J. 2007;6:31. DOI:10.1186/1475-2891-6-31
17. Brand-Miller JC, Holt SH, Pawlak DB, McMillan J. Glycemic index and
obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(1):281S-285S.
18. Miller M, Beach V, Sorkin JD, Mangano C, Dobmeier C, Novacic D, et
al. Comparative effects of three popular diets on lipids, endothelial
function, and C-reactive protein during weight maintenance. J Am Diet
Assoc. 2009;109(4):713-717. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.12.023.
19. Skov AR, Toubro S, Ronn B, Holm L, Astrup A. Randomized trial
on protein vs carbohydrate in ad libitum fat reduced diet for the
treatment of obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(5):528-
Page 5 of 5
Koohkan S, Golesorkhi M, Vitolins MZ, McCarthy DH, Berg A, et al. (2016) The Influence of a Meal Replacement
Formula on Leptin Regulation in Obese Adults. J Nutrition Health Food Sci 4(4): 1-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15226/
jnhfs.2016.00169
©
536.
20.
derived from soybean. Peptides 2014;54:171–179. doi:http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.peptides.2014.01.022
21. Berg A, Frey I, Landmann U, Deibert P, König D, Berg A, et al. Gewichts-
reduktion durch Lebensstilintervention: Einjahresergebnisse einer
klinisch kontrollierten, randomisierten studie mit übergewichtigen
Erwachsenen. Ernährungs-Umschau 2005;52:310-314.
22. Noakes M, Foster PR, Keogh JB, Clifton PM. Meal replacements are as
effective as structured weight-loss diets for treating obesity in adults
with features of metabolic syndrome. J Nutr. 2004;134(8):1894-1899.
23.
management using a meal replacement strategy: meta and
pooling analysis from six studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.
2003;27(5):537-549. DOI:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802258
24. Berg A, König D, Deibert P, Frey I. Favorable metabolic properties
of a soy-honey-yoghurt product for meal replacement in overweight
subjects with atherogenic risk. Atherosclerosis Supp. 2008;9(1):253.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1567-5688(08)71015-8
25. Jang EH, Moon JS, Ko JH, Ahn CW, Lee HH, Shin JK, et al. Novel black soy
peptides with antiobesity effects: activation of leptin-like signaling
and AMP-activated protein kinase. Int J Obes. 2008;32(7):1161-1170.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.60.
26. Gonzalez de Mejia E, Vasconez M, de Lumen BO, Nelson R. Lunasin
concentration in different soybean genotypes, commercial soy protein,
DOI:10.1021/jf0496752
27. Banks WA. The blood-brain barrier as a cause of obesity. Curr Pharm
Des. 2008;14(16):1606-1614.
28. Popescu BO, Toescu EC, Popescu LM, Bajenaru O, Muresanu DF,
Schultzberg MN, et al. Blood-brain barrier alterations in aging and
dementia. J Neurol Sci. 2009;283(1-2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.
jns.2009.02.321.
29. Flores MB, Fernandes MF, Ropelle ER, Faria MC, Ueno M, Velloso
LA, et al. Exercise Improves insulin and leptin sensitivity in the
hypothalamus of Wistar rats. Diabetes 2006;55(9):2554-2561.
DOI:10.2337/db05-1622
30. Deibert P, Solleder F, König D, Vitolins MZ, Dickhuth HH, Gollhofer A,
et al. Soy protein based supplementation supports metabolic effects
of resistance training in untrained middle aged males. Aging Male
2011;14(4):273-279. doi: 10.3109/13685538.2011.565091.
31.
in the hypotriglyceridemic effect of soy protein in the rat. J Nutr
Biochem. 2002;13(11):671-677.
32. Wang Y, Jones PJ, Ausman LM, Lichtenstein AH. Soy protein reduces
triglyceride levels and triglyceride fatty acid fractional synthesis rate
in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Atherosclerosis. 2004;173(2):269-
75. DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2003.12.015
33. Velasquez MT, Bhathena SJ. Role of dietary soy protein in obesity. Int
J Med Sci. 2007;4(2):72-82.
34. Udenigwe CC, Aluko RE. Food protein-derived bioactive peptides:
2012;77(1):R11-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02455.x