ArticlePDF Available

Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene

Authors:

Abstract

[A more updated version of this paper is also in researchgate with a PDF] Indigenous and allied scholars, knowledge keepers, scientists, learners, change-makers, and leaders are creating a field to support Indigenous peoples’ capacities to address anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change. Indigenous studies often reflect the memories and knowledges that arise from Indigenous peoples’ living heritages as societies with stories, lessons, and long histories of having to be well-organized to adapt to seasonal and inter-annual environmental changes. At the same time, our societies have been heavily disrupted by colonialism, capitalism, and industrialization. As a Potawatomi scholar-activist working on issues Indigenous people face with the U.S. settler state, I perceive at least three key themes reflected across the field that suggest distinct approaches to inquiries into climate change: 1. Anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change is an intensification of environmental change imposed on Indigenous peoples by colonialism. 2. Renewing Indigenous knowledges, such as traditional ecological knowledge, can bring together Indigenous communities to strengthen their own self-determined planning for climate change. 3. Indigenous peoples often imagine climate change futures from their perspectives (a) as societies with deep collective histories of having to be well-organized to adapt environmental change and (b) as societies who must reckon with the disruptions of historic and ongoing practices of colonialism, capitalism, and industrialization. In engaging these themes, I will claim, at the end, that Indigenous studies offer critical, decolonizing approaches to how to address climate change. The approaches arise from how our ways of imagining the future guide our present actions. The article is forthcoming in English Language Notes.
1
Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene
Kyle Whyte
Forthcoming 2017 in English Language Notes.
Introduction
Indigenous and allied scholars, knowledge keepers, scientists, learners, change-makers,
and leaders are creating a field to support Indigenous peoples’ capacities to address
anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change. Provisionally, I call it Indigenous climate change
studies (Indigenous studies, for short, in this essay). The studies involve many types of work,
including Indigenous climate resiliency plans, such as the Salish-Kootenai Tribe’s Climate
Change Strategic Plan that includes sections on “Culture” and “Tribal Elder Observations,”
policy documents, such as the Inuit Petition expressing “the right to be cold,” conferences, such
as “Climate Changed: Reflections on Our Past, Present and Future Situation,” organized by the
Indigenous Peoples Climate Change Working Group, and numerous declarations and academic
papers, from the Mandaluyong Declaration of the Global Conference on Indigenous Women,
Climate Change and REDD+ to a special issue of the scientific journal Climatic Change devoted
to Indigenous peoples in the U.S. context.i
Indigenous studies often reflect the memories and knowledges that arise from Indigenous
peoples’ living heritages as societies with stories, lessons, and long histories of having to be well-
organized to adapt to seasonal and inter-annual environmental changes. At the same time, our
societies have been heavily disrupted by colonialism, capitalism, and industrialization. Regarding
Indigenous peoples in the Arctic, Callison writes that climate change is “Understood as an
emergent form of life… climate change presents the need for excavation and reassessment of
what a recognition of climate change portends for those who have endured a century of immense
cultural, political and environmental changes.”ii Indigenous studies, then, arise from memories,
knowledges, histories, and experiences of oppression that differ from many of the nonindigenous
scientists, environmentalists, and politicians who are prominent in the framing of the issue of
climate change today.
As a Potawatomi scholar-activist working on issues Indigenous people face with the U.S.
settler state, I perceive at least three key themes reflected across the field that suggest distinct
approaches to inquiries into climate change:
1. Anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change is an intensification of environmental
change imposed on Indigenous peoples by colonialism.
2. Renewing Indigenous knowledges, such as traditional ecological knowledge, can bring
together Indigenous communities to strengthen their own self-determined planning for
climate change.
3. Indigenous peoples often imagine climate change futures from their perspectives (a) as
societies with deep collective histories of having to be well-organized to adapt
environmental change and (b) as societies who must reckon with the disruptions of
historic and ongoing practices of colonialism, capitalism, and industrialization.
In engaging these themes, I will claim, at the end, that Indigenous studies offer critical,
decolonizing approaches to how to address climate change. The approaches arise from how our
ways of imagining the future guide our present actions.
2
Back to the Future: Climate Change as Intensified Colonialism
Colonialism refers to a form of domination in which at least one society seeks to exploit
some set of benefits believed to be found in the territory of one or more other societies, from farm
land to precious minerals to labor. Exploitation can occur through military invasion, slavery, and
settlement. Colonialism often paved the way for the expansion of capitalism, or an economic
ideology based on wage-labor that prioritizes growth in monetary profits for the owners of assets
as the underlying focus, incentive, and purpose of major human social endeavors.iii
Together, colonialism and capitalism then laid key parts of the groundwork for
industrialization—or carbon-intensive economics—which produce the drivers of anthropogenic
climate change, from massive deforestation for commodity agriculture to petrochemical
technologies that burn fossil fuels for energy. The colonial invasion that began centuries ago
caused anthropogenic environmental changes that rapidly disrupted many Indigenous peoples,
including deforestation, pollution, modification of hydrological cycles, and the amplification of
soil-use and terraforming for particular types of farming, grazing, transportation, and residential,
commercial and government infrastructure.
Colonially-induced environmental changes altered the ecological conditions that
supported Indigenous peoples’ cultures, health, economies, and political self-determination.
While Indigenous peoples, as any society, have long histories of adapting to change, colonialism
caused changes at such a rapid pace that many Indigenous peoples became vulnerable to harms,
from health problems related to new diets to erosion of their cultures to the destruction of
Indigenous diplomacy, to which they were not as susceptible prior to colonization. Indigenous
peoples often understand their vulnerability to climate change as an intensification of colonially-
induced environmental changes.
Scientific syntheses, including the U.S. National Climate Assessment and
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment reports, provide evidence that
anthropogenic climate change affects Indigenous peoples earlier and more severely than other
populations. Indigenous peoples, for example, are already among the first “climate refugees” in
regions such as the Arctic or Pacific where sea-level rise is occurring.iv Climate change affects
the integrity of Indigenous cultures and economies as the habitats change for species such as
salmon that are important to Indigenous cultures, health, and economies.v
Shifting habitats and climate-induced displacement have implications for Indigenous self-
determination. They can offset agreements with nations over designated harvesting areas, such as
treaties, that are difficult to renegotiate with more powerful nation-state parties who are heavily
influenced by corporations and constituencies of citizens who are largely ignorant about
Indigenous peoples. Or they can throw Indigenous peoples into bureaucratic processes of
emergency management in which Indigenous peoples’ voices are silenced by states, corporations,
and local governments.vi
Indigenous scholars discuss climate vulnerability as an intensification or intensified
episode of colonialism. Wildcat claims that Indigenous climate relocation today is part of three
removals occurring as part of U.S. colonial, capitalist, and industrial expansion. The first two
removals were “geographic” (displacement, e.g. Trail of Tears and the forced occupation of
reservations), and “social” and “psycho-cultural” (such as through removal of children to
boarding schools). Now,
As ice sheets and glaciers melt permafrost thaws, and seacoasts and riverbanks erode in
the near and circumpolar arctic, peoples indigenous to these places will be forced to
move, not as a result of something their Native lifeways produced, but because the most
technologically advanced societies on the planet have built their modern lifestyles on a
carbon energy foundation….vii
3
For Wildcat, the immediacy of climate refugees is like the experience of déjà vu given that
relocation and displacement are part of the history of colonially-induced environmental changes
that harmed Indigenous peoples. Hence scholars such as Kimmerer can claim that, “Once again,
we are in a situation of forced climate change adaptation.”viii
Colonially-driven environmental change destroyed ecosystems on which Indigenous
peoples relied, boxed Indigenous peoples into small reservations that were fractions of their
original territories, or simply displaced Indigenous peoples from their homelands to new
ecosystems. Boarding schools forced Indigenous peoples to adopt English as their primary
language, thereby erasing the knowledges encoded within their own languages about how to live
in relation to certain ecological conditions; Indigenous students had to adopt heterosexual and
patriarchal gender norms that demoralized and disenfranchised Indigenous girls, women and two-
spirit persons. The U.S. forced Indigenous peoples to take on corporate government structures
that incentivized Tribal government leaders to depend on and buy into extractive industries and
other capitalist enterprises (today, gaming is one of them but so is the coal industry).
Through each of these practices of colonialism, Indigenous peoples witnessed the away-
migration of their nonhuman relatives. Kimmerer writes that “Like the displaced farmers of
Bangladesh fleeing rising sea levels, maples will become climate refugees. To survive they must
migrate northward to find homes at the boreal fringe. Our energy policy is forcing them to leave.
They will be exiled from their homelands for the price of cheap gas.”ix Mastak et al. see
colonialism “as the literal planting and displanting of peoples, animals, and plantsas inscribing
a domination into blood and soil…”x Away-migration also occurs in a “psycho-cultural” sense, as
Wildcat calls it, when people lose customs, protocols, skill-sets, and identities (e.g. animal clan
identities in some Tribes) related to particular plants, animals, insects, and ecosystems.
Indigenous studies, then, seek to understand vulnerability to climate change as an
intensification colonialism. Chief, in work spanning several collaborations she is part of, analyzes
the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe’s (PLPT) vulnerability to climate stressors in relation to their
identities as Kuyuidokado/Kooyooee Tukadu, or cui-ui (fish) eaters whose relationship to the fish
has been eroded, on a cyclical, though intensified, basis, by the Derby Dam built some 100 years
ago, high demand for water by settlers, and settler-caused environmental changes that exacerbate
droughts.xi So climate change is related to settlement and it is the actions of settlement that
opened up PLPT territories for the development of cities such as Reno, Nevada.
Marino and Maldonado discuss how climate change is an intensification of colonialism
which opened up territories for settlements and forced some Indigenous peoples to relocate.
Marino, working with the Kigiqitamiut people in the Village of Shishmaref, Alaska, writes that
“Previous flexibility to environmental shifts and unexpected hazards allowed the community to
adapt to abrupt changes.” Yet now a colonially-driven “relatively immobile infrastructure and
development requires people to stay in place in order to carry out their daily lives.”xii Maldonado
shows the vulnerability to sea level rise that is forcing the displacement of the Isle de Jean
Charles Band of Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw Indians arises from a number of colonial factors tied
to energy and agriculture including dredging canals, cutting oil and gas pipelines, constructing
dikes and levees, damming the Mississippi river, and large agricultural developments.xiii
The intensified déjà vu experience of climate change engages some of the most critical
issues Indigenous peoples face today, gender being one of them. Climate change impacts affect
Indigenous women more acutely, in many cases, while colonial policies for addressing climate
change devalue the leadership of Indigenous women.xiv Moreover, Sweet claims that that “With
warming temperatures and melting ice comes greater accessibility to the [Arctic] region, leading
to more outside influences and more potential human security threats,including sex
trafficking.xv Oil production fields, such as the Bakken production field in North Dakota, form
“man camps” for laborers that attract violent sex trafficking of Indigenous persons.xvi Of course,
4
as a large literature in Indigenous gender studies shows, colonial domination and gender
violence/oppression are of a piece.xvii Climate change, then, is both a gendered form of colonially
imposed environmental change, and another intensified episode of colonialism that opens up
Indigenous territories for capitalism and industrialization that occurs through gender violence.
In the studies just referenced, Indigenous persons and allies examine climate change less
as a future trend, and more as the experience of going back to the future. For anthropogenic
climate change is an intensified repetition of anthropogenic environmental change inflicted on
Indigenous peoples via colonial practices that facilitated capitalist industrial expansion. The same
colonial practices and policies that opened up Indigenous territories for deforestation and
extractive industries are the ones that make adaptation difficult for Indigenous peoples today.
Anthropogenic climate change makes Indigenous territories more accessible and
Indigenous peoples more vulnerable to harm, just as did laws, policies, boarding schools, and the
like in previous episodes of colonization. A rising number of scholars, such as Cameron, Stuhl,
Haalbloom and Natcher, are adamant that the analysis of Indigenous climate vulnerability cannot
occur in the absence of the history and present practices colonialism and capitalism in Indigenous
homelands.xviii
Renewing Relatives: Indigenous Knowledges and Climate Change
Indigenous knowledges, in the simplest terms, refer to systems of monitoring, recording,
communicating, and learning about the relationships among humans, nonhuman plants and
animals, and ecosystems that are required for any society to survive and flourish in particular
ecosystems which are subject to perturbations of various kinds. Indigenous knowledges range
from how ecological information is encoded in words and grammars of Indigenous languages, to
protocols of mentorship of elders and youth, to kin-based and spiritual relationships with plants
and animals, to memories of environmental change used to draw lessons about how to adapt to
similar changes in the future.xix Indigenous peoples see their knowledges as containing important
insights about how to negotiate today’s environmental issues; they often see the renewal of their
knowledge systems as a significant strategy for achieving successful adaptation planning.
Sakakabira, in her work with Iñupiat communities in the arctic, discusses how people live
according to relationships of moral reciprocity with whales, an animal they depend on
economically, culturally, and for health. The connection is so intimate Sakakabira calls it
cetaceousnes(whale-consciousness). While Iñupiat whale knowledge provides practical
information on whale lifecycles that facilitate hunting and other practices that secure human
benefits from whales, the knowledge also brings people together to respond to climate change.
For example, climate change is experienced through changes in the availability of the whale
tissue used for traditional drum membranes. Whereas historically drum ceremonies expressed the
whales’ invitations to bring people together, climate induced disruptions in whale cycles have
been associated with a resurgence in drumming ceremonies in some communities. The
ceremonies now express humans’ invitation for whales to come back to reciprocal relations (with
humans).xx
Norgaard and Reed seek to renew Karuk knowledge, especially burning practices, as a
basis for bringing the community members together to address climate change today—a goal they
call “knowledge sovereignty. Reed views “climate change as a strategic opportunity not only for
Tribes to retain cultural practices and return traditional management practices to the landscape,
but for all land managers to remedy inappropriate ecological actions, and for enhanced and
successful collaboration in the face of collective survival.”xxi Through rekindling traditional
burning connected to many human, plant, fish, and animal interactions, the Karuk climate change
5
strategy renews Karuk knowledge to convene the community members themselves and improve
the basis for collaborating with nonindigenous parties.
The St. Regis Mohawk Change Plan, spurred by the leadership of Arquette and Benedict,
is organized entirely from the human relationships with plants, animals, spiritual beings, and
ecosystems of their Thanksgiving Address and that are part of Mohawk knowledge of how to be
good environmental stewards. The plan’s sections are divided into “The People, Mother Earth,
The Waters, The Fish, Small Plants and Grasses, The Berries, Three Sisters, Medicine Herbs,
Animals, Trees, The Birds, The Four Winds, The Thunderers, Grandmother Moon, The Sun, the
Starts, the Four Beings, the Creator”.xxii Each section in the vulnerability analysis begins with a
story and a description of the cultural and historical significance of the relationships, followed by
comparisons between observed changes and scientific information about climate change.
Solutions to climate adaption in the report involve the continued renewal of the relationships,
whether through education or stewardship practices, to mobilize community members to take
action to address climate change.
In McNeeley’s work with Koyukon people of Koyukuk-Middle Yukon region in the
Arctic, one of the issues was that the state of Alaska, in order to cope with the consequences of
climate change, was imposing hunting regulations on moose that would restrict Indigenous
subsistence harvesting. The collaborators constructed, using Koyukon knowledge of their
seasonal round, a seasonal wheel that shows their understanding of seasonality. The Seasonal
Round original sketch was hand drawn by a Koyukon youth after a community focus group.
Subsequently, different iterations were reviewed by elders and community members. The
seasonal wheel, which illustrates numerous human relationships, terrestrial and aquatic plants and
animals, and technologies, demonstrates that shifting the moose hunting season later so as to
correspond with the Indigenous view of seasonality make more sense than the date proposed by
state and federal regulators.xxiii
Renewing Indigenous knowledges can bring together Indigenous communities to
strengthen their self-determined planning for climate change. In the cases just described renewing
knowledges involved renewing relationships with humans and nonhumans and restoring
reciprocity among the relatives (i.e. the parties to the relationships). I call this process renewing
relatives, as it involves both restoring persisting relationships that are part of longstanding
Indigenous heritages but also creating new relationships that support Indigenous peoples’
mobilizing to address climate change. While Indigenous knowledges obviously have useful
information about the nature of ecological changes, it is perhaps more interesting to explore how
renewing Indigenous knowledges serves the motivation of people and communities to address
climate change.
Of course, many Indigenous persons are understandably concerned that climate scientists
will intentionally or naively clamor around Indigenous communities to exploit the information
Indigenous knowledges might possess that could fill in gaps in climate science research. Hardison
and Williams, in their work at the Tulalip Tribe’s Treaty Rights Office and at the United Nations,
have designed improved ethical policies and practices for bridging epistemic, power and
privilege, cultural, and political differences that scientists often are not trained to understand. Yet
as Hardison and Williams show, the more scientists understand the significance of the practice
and renewal of Indigenous knowledges for Indigenous peoples’ own purposes of preparing for
climate change and protecting their ways of life (sometimes called the governance value of
Indigenous knowledgesxxiv), the more scientists will grasp richer senses of their responsibilities to
work with Indigenous collaborators mutually instead of exploitatively.xxv
6
Indigenizing Futures
The First Alaskan’s Institute, an Indigenous organization, includes as one of its slogans,
“progress for the next 10,000 years,” referring to Indigenous Alaskans’ own histories of living in
that region for that long. Since Indigenous peoples in North America think at this scale, the time
period of European, U.S., and Canadian colonialism, imperialism, and settlement appears very
short and acutely disruptive. Indigenous conceptions of the future often present striking contrasts
between deep Indigenous histories and the brief, but highly disruptive colonial, capitalist, and
industrial periods. Moreover, many Indigenous histories are explicit about the fact that
Indigenous peoples, as collective actors, have also influenced local and regional environments.
Many peoples’ calendars and seasonal rounds explicitly demonstrate how Indigenous peoples,
through practices such as burning and fishing, managed and maintained certain ecosystems.
These ecosystems also changed through human interventions such as regional trading.
A term like “anthropogenic” has very diverse meanings for Indigenous peoples, from
gradual changes, such as the adoption of new “relatives” (e.g. adoption of the horse in North
America) to the shaping of habitats for certain plants and animals, to disruptive settler
colonialism, such as practiced by Europeans arriving in North America. “Anthropogenic climate
change” or “the Anthropocene,” then, are not precise enough terms for many Indigenous peoples,
because they sound like all humans are implicated in and affected by colonialism, capitalism and
industrialization in the same ways.xxvi
Davis and Todd argue that the Anthropocene is rooted in colonization. For colonialism
has always included terraforming that tears apart what they call the “fleshxxvii
xxviii
of human-
nonhuman-ecological relationships. That colonizers today, from settlers to imperialists, are
concerned about climate change, suggests that they are now being affected by the seismic waves
of massive ecosystem transformation that began over 500 years ago. Mitchell cautions against
“marking European colonization as a driving force of the Anthropocene,” because doing so may
“naturalize” colonization. That is, the “risk of equating human forms of agency with ‘natural
forces’ is that they come to be seen as inevitable, determinate and less contestable than ‘political
forces’.” Mitchell points out that “the Anthropocene is not the product of ‘humanity’, but rather
particular segments of it.”xxix
For Indigenous peoples, we do not tell our futures beginning from the position of concern
with the Anthropocene as a hitherto unanticipated vision of human intervention, which involves
mass extinctions and the disappearance of certain ecosystems. For the colonial period already
rendered comparable outcomes that cost Indigenous peoples their reciprocal relationships with
thousands of plants, animals, and ecosystems—most of which are not coming back. As Gross
claims, “Native Americans have seen the end of their respective worlds… Just as importantly,
though, Indians survived the apocalypse. This raises the further question, then, of what happens to
a society that has gone through an apocalyptic event?”xxx
Some answers to Gross’ question lie in the work of Indigenous Climate Change Studies
described already in this essay. Indigenous imaginations of our futures in relation to climate
change—the stuff of didactic science fictionbegin already with our living today in post-
apocalyptic situation. Had someone told our ancestors a story of what today’s times are like for
Indigenous peoples, our ancestors would surely have thought they were hearing dystopian tales.
For Indigenous peoples live in worlds so changed by colonialism, capitalism, and
industrialization that our collective self-determination and agency are compromised to a degree
our ancestors would have been haunted by. Indigenizing our futures involves our reflecting on
why our ancestors’ would have thought today’s times are dystopian.
In our case, reflecting on why our ancestors’ would have perceived the present as
dystopian provides guidance on how to live under post-apocalyptic conditions. The Menominee
7
Nation’s recent development of culturally, spiritually, and economically significant sustainable
forest was actually their response to the colonially-induced destruction of their relationships with
many species. The transition to forestry involved envisioning and performing certain relationships
and responsibilities that would have mattered to their ancestors—just now in relation to forest
biodiversity. The Menominee’s relationships to the forest motivates their ongoing leadership in
addressing climate change. xxxii
xxxiii
xxxi Indigenous climate justice activism is also about performing
these ancestrally inspired visions, including the recent insistence by some leaders of the Standing
Rock Sioux Tribe that their resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline is primarily about prayer,
ceremony, honoring their ancestors, and renewing their reciprocal responsibilities with water.
Indigenous climate change studies perform futurities that Indigenous persons can build
on in generations to come. That is, our actions today are cyclical performances; they are guided
by our reflection on our ancestors’ perspectives and on our desire to be good ancestors ourselves
to future generations. Wildcat calls this performance “indigenuity;” Kimmerer, “returning the
gift(if we think broadly, in a multigenerational sense, about what Kimmerer means, here).xxxiv
So for Indigenous peoples, “the Anthropocene epoch,” as a concept some people invoke often to
envision the future, does not present us, at first glance, with the specter of unprecedented
changes. Indigenous Climate Change Studies is a field that opens up our interpretations of our
own histories and futurities, with the goal of supporting Indigenous capacities to address climate
change and the continuance of flourishing future generations.
NOTES
i Joanna Harrington, "Climate Change, Human Rights, and the Right to Be Cold," Fordham Envtl. L. Rev. 18 (2006);
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Climate Change Strategic Plan (2013); Sara
Shepherd, "Conference at Haskell Explores How Climate Change Affects American Indians " Lawrence Journal-
World, September 22 2016; Mandaluyong Declaration, "Mandaluyong Declaration of the Global Conference on
Indigenous Women, Climate Change and Redd Plus," in Indigenous Women, Climate Change & Forests, ed. Tebtebba
(Baguio City, Philippines: Tebtebba Foundation, 2011). REDD+ refers to the United Nations program, Reducing
Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries; Julie Koppel Maldonado, Rajul E.
Pandya, and Benedict J. Colombi, "Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States: Impacts, Experiences,
and Actions," Climatic Change 120, no. 3 (2013).
ii Candis Callison, How Climate Change Comes to Matter: The Communal Life of Facts (Duke University Press, 2014),
42.
iii Moraña et al., Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate (Duke University Press, 2008).
iv Julie Koppel Maldonado et al., "The Impact of Climate Change on Tribal Communities in the Us: Displacement,
Relocation, and Human Rights," Climatic Change 120, no. 3 (2013).
v K. Norton-Smith et al., "Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples: A Synthesis of Current Impacts and Experiences,"
in General Technical Report (Portland, OR, USA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Research Station, 2016).
vi Zoltan Grossman and Alan Parker, Asserting Native Resilience: Pacific Rim Indigenous Nations Face the Climate
Crisis (Oregon State University Press, 2012); Randall S Abate and Elizabeth Ann Kronk, Climate Change and
Indigenous Peoples: The Search for Legal Remedies (Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013);
Christine Shearer, Kivalina: A Climate Change Story (Haymarket Books, 2011).
vii Daniel R. Wildcat, Red Alert! Saving the Planet with Indigenous Knowledge (Golden, CO, USA: Fulcrum, 2009), 4.
viii Robin Kimmerer, "Climate Change and Indigenous Knowledge," in Center for Aboriginal Initiatives (University of
Toronto 2014).
ix Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants (Milkweed Editions,
2013), 173.
x Tomaz Mastnak, Julia Elyachar, and Tom Boellstorff, "Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants,"
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32, no. 2 (2014): 367.
xi Karletta Chief et al., "Indigenous Experiences in the Us with Climate Change and Environmental Stewardship in the
Anthropocene," in Forest Conservation and Management in the Anthropocene: Conference Proceedings, ed. V. Alaric
Sample and R. Patrick Bixler (Fort Collins, CO, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Rocky Mountain
Research Station, 2014).
8
xii Elizabeth Marino, “The Long History of Environmental Migration: Assessing Vulnerability Construction and
Obstacles to Successful Relocation in Shishmaref, Alaska,” Global Environmental Change 22 no. 2 (2012): 374.
xiii Maldonado et al. (2013).
xiv Kirsten Vinyeta, Kyle Powys Whyte, and Kathy Lynn, "Climate Change through an Intersectional Lens: Gendered
Vulnerability and Resilience in Indigenous Communities in the United States," Forest Service General Technical
Report PNW-GTR-923 (2015).
xv Victoria Sweet, "Rising Waters, Rising Threats: The Human Trafficking of Indigenous Women in the Circumpolar
Region of the United States and Canada," The Yearbook of Polar Law Online 6, no. 1 (2014).
xvi Sarah Deer, The Beginning and End of Rape (University of Minnesota Press, 2015).
xvii Goeman, Mishuana R, and Jennifer Nez Denetdale. "Native Feminisms: Legacies, Interventions, and Indigenous
Sovereignties." Wicazo Sa Review 24, no. 2 (2009).
xviii Emilie S Cameron, "Securing Indigenous Politics: A Critique of the Vulnerability and Adaptation Approach to the
Human Dimensions of Climate Change in the Canadian Arctic," Global Environmental Change 22, no. 1 (2012);
Andrew Stuhl, Unfreezing the Arctic: Science, Colonialism, and the Transformation of Inuit Lands (Chicago, IL, USA:
University of Chicago Press, 2016); Bethany Haalboom and David C. Natcher, "The Power and Peril of
“Vulnerability”: Approaching Community Labels with Caution in Climate Change Research," Arctic 65, no. 3 (2012).
xix Benedict J Colombi, "Salmon and the Adaptive Capacity of Nimiipuu (Nez Perce) Culture to Cope with Change,"
The American Indian Quarterly 36, no. 1 (2012). Samantha Chisholm Hatfield, "Traditional Ecological Knowledge of
Siletz Tribal Members" (Oregon State University, 2009); Paulette Blanchard, "Our Squirrels Will Have Elephant Ears:
Indigenous Perspectives on Climate Change in the South Central United States" (University of Oklahoma, 2015);
Nelson, Melissa. "The Hydromythology of the Anishinaabeg." In Centering Anishinaabeg Studies: Understanding the
World through Stories, edited by Jill Doerfler, Niigaanwewidam James Sinclair and Heidi Kiiwetinepinesiik Stark,
213-33. East Lansing, MI, USA: MSU Press, 2013.
xx Chie Sakakibara, "‘No Whale, No Music’: Iñupiat Drumming and Global Warming," Polar Record 45, no. 04
(2009).
xxi Kari Norgaard, "Retaining Knowledge Sovereignty: Expanding the Application of Tribal Traditional Knowledge on
Forest Lands in the Face of Climate Change," Prepared for the Karuk Tribe Department of Natural Resources
www.karuktribeclimatechangeprojects.files.wordpress.com (2014).
xxii St. Regis Mohawk Environmental Division, Climate Change Adaptation Plan for Akwesasne (Akwasasne, St. Regis
Mohawk Tribe2013).
xxiii Shannon M McNeeley and Martha D Shulski, "Anatomy of a Closing Window: Vulnerability to Changing
Seasonality in Interior Alaska," Global Environmental Change 21, no. 2 (2011); Shannon M McNeeley, "Examining
Barriers and Opportunities for Sustainable Adaptation to Climate Change in Interior Alaska," Climatic Change 111, no.
3-4 (2012).
xxiv Climate and Traditional Knowledges Workgroup, "The Ethics of Traditional Knowledge Exchange in Climate
Change Initiatives. Earthzine," Earthzine July 31 (2015).
xxv Terry Williams and Preston Hardison, "Culture, Law, Risk and Governance: Contexts of Traditional Knowledge in
Climate Change Adaptation," Climatic Change 120, no. 3 (2013).
xxvi See also, Schulz, Karsten. "Decolonising the Anthropocene: The Mytho-Politics of Human Mastery." Journal of
Political Ecology Forthcoming (2017).
xxvii Vanessa Watts, "Indigenous Place-Thought and Agency Amongst Humans and Non-Humans (First Woman and
Sky Woman Go on a European World Tour!)," Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 2, no. 1 (2013).
xxviii Heather Davis and Zoe Todd, personal correspondence on unpublished manuscript project.
xxix Audra Mitchell, "Decolonising the Anthropocene " https://worldlyir.wordpress.com/2015/03/17/decolonising-the-
anthropocene/ (2015).
xxx Lawrence W Gross, Anishinaabe Ways of Knowing and Being (Routledge, 2016), 33.
xxxi Kyle Whyte, Chris Caldwell, and Marie Schaefer.Indigenous Insights about Sustainability: Are they only about
what works for “all humanity”? Paper under review (2017). Draft available at
https://michiganstate.academia.edu/KyleWhyte
xxxii Janet Fiskio, "Dancing at the End of the World: The Poetics of the Body in Indigenous Protest," in Ecocriticism
and Indigenous Studies: Conversations from Earth to Cosmos, ed. Salma Monani and Joni Adamson (Routledge,
2016).
xxxiii Jaskiran Dhillon and Nick Estes, "Standing Rock, #NoDAPL, and Mni Wiconi," Hot Spots, Cultural
Anthropology, December 22, 2016.
xxxiv Wildcat 2009; Kimmerer 2013.
... In Indigenous societies, there is a frequent emphasis on honoring nature and practicing sustainable resource management. For instance, Indigenous knowledge systems, such as rotational farming and sustainable fishing, are rooted in a profound grasp of local ecosystems and a dedication to safeguarding them for posterity (Whyte, 2017;Berkes, 2018). These actions support both the preservation of biodiversity and the enhancement of community relationships and cultural heritage. ...
... • Environmental Ecology: Native conservation methods like controlled fires, rotational agriculture, and agroforestry support biodiversity, reduce wildfires, and uphold ecosystems. These actions help in the campaign against climate change and the preservation of natural resources (Whyte, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
This research investigates the complex relationships among social systems, personal wellness, and environmental sustainability through the lens of social ecology. This research explores the ways in which individual experiences, organizational frameworks, cultural practices, and societal norms affect human actions and community interactions by analyzing social ecology theory and Félix Guattari's idea of the "three ecologies" in real-world contexts. The study emphasizes advancing social justice, equality, and sustainable living while examining how social ecology can tackle present issues like global migration, technological advancement, and the climate emergency. This research aims to inform educators, community leaders, legislators, and others about building a more equitable and just society.
... Natural Law of being in relation to benefit the collective wellbeing and calls for global Indigeneity where such knowledge and practices are housed within diverse Indigenous languages, histories, laws, territories, and cultures (Wildcat and Voth, 2023;Gould et al., 2023), is interwoven in the ITEK framework. ITEKs represent Indigenous epistemologies (i.e., systems of thinking and knowing) and ontologies (i.e., theory of the nature of reality) that are community-based, holistic, ancestrally-derived and orally transmitted, and share a deep relationship with our fellow relatives and place (Whyte, 2017;Redvers et al., 2022). This study further calls to identify salient "Threats" and implement decolonizing "Solutions" that impact AIFN youth participation in local NBTSAs. ...
Article
Full-text available
Understanding the role of place in connection to Indigenous youth participation in nature-based traditional and spiritual activities (NBTSA) is of primary concern as exposure to both nature and culture collectively contribute to overall health and wellbeing. From oppressive historical Indian policies to contemporary barriers by way of climate change and increased use of technology, Indigenous youth continue to face risk of detaching from nature and losing pieces of their cultural identity. Qualitative and quantitative features of place in predicting NBTSA participation among Indigenous youth are not well understood and may offer key insights that connect youth to land, water and their cultures. Moreover, application of the Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge (ITEK) theoretical model to inform the social sciences has largely been absent. In this study, we sought to investigate the role of place measured by residing in a sovereign Tribal or First Nation (qualitative) and increased presence of greenspace (quantitative) exposure on participation in NBTSAs among Indigenous youth. Our findings demonstrate that although increasing residential exposure to greenspace had a positive association, residing in a Tribal Nation was a stronger predictor for NBTSA participation. Applying an Indigenous methodology to research with Indigenous populations and communities allows us to move beyond general notions of what (e.g., greenspace) promotes human-nature interaction and, instead, identify place-based determinants. Namely, the ITEK framework guided our rationale to include Tribal Nations in our study. Sovereign Nations connect youth to traditional knowledge holders that share Indigenous knowledges and practices of the land and water through story and experiential learning. Significance. This study is one of the first to measure both qualitative and quantitative features of place that influence human-nature interaction among youth that collectively identify as Indigenous. Our research found that residing in a sovereign Tribal Nation is a stronger predictor than increasing exposure to greenspace for participating in land-and water-based traditional and spiritual practices providing evidence and public health implications for Indigenous determinants to health and wellbeing.
... These institutions may have been founded on, or continue to reinforce, the systems of exclusion mentioned above. This aligns with the work of Indigenous environmental justice scholars Gilio-Whitaker [12] and Whyte [20][21][22], who argue for a structural-historical foundation to environmental justice that centers the legacy of settler colonialism in ongoing environmental injustices. As such, justice is achieved with rights, sovereignty, and self-determination [23]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The transition from fossil fuels to renewable sources is shifting the landscape of energy projects and associated mining for critical minerals. New solar farms, wind farms, lithium mines, and the like have been proposed, permitted, or constructed around the world. How these projects intersect with environmental justice creates new spaces for contestation and collaboration. This case study focuses on a National Science Foundation-supported project for which we created a series of courses to immerse students in critical reflection on energy transitions and environmental justice. Our project seeks ways to disrupt the historical pattern of environmental injustices inflicted on marginalized communities during earth resource development, by identifying approaches to responsibly secure the domestic supply of critical elements. These courses, which included both semester-long and field-based summer experiences, focused on critical topics such as Indigenous sovereignty and responsible minerals acquisition. Field courses offered hands-on learning, such as visiting coal mines and solar farms on the Navajo Nation, fostering a deeper understanding of energy sovereignty. We promoted equity and transformative learning experiences by emphasizing storytelling, reflexive teaching, and incorporating Indigenous knowledge through invited guest speakers and collaborative content. We assessed courses through student surveys and projects, revealing an increased understanding of energy transitions, mining, and environmental justice. Relational teaching, involving trust-building with peers, teachers, and guest speakers, proved essential to learning. This case study demonstrates how relational practices can foster empathetic learning around contentious topics.
... Scholars in Indigenous climate change studies have heaped substantial criticism on climate adaptation projects which fail to consider the implications of habitat change, climate vulnerability, and climate-induced displacement for Indigenous self-determination (Whyte 2017). Daniel Wildcat (2009) argues that Indigenous climate relocation today is part of three removals occurring as part of U.S. colonial, capitalist, and industrial expansion. ...
Article
As southern Louisiana is experiencing one of the highest rates of sea level rise in the world, it is not uncommon for residents to hear that it is “too late” to save their homes from the impacts of climate change. Particularly, in the wake of disaster events such as hurricanes and oil spills, heavily damaged areas are often left behind in the recovery process as few developers are willing to take the capital risk to rebuild a sinking neighborhood. Still, some of these residents refuse to be moved and their resilient spirit is widely celebrated. Cultural resilience alone, however, is not enough to resist the onslaught of climate disasters nor counter systemic disinvestment in their communities. Through combining historical and ethnographic insights from the Black residents in Cancer Alley, the Vietnamese refugee community in New Orleans East, and the Indigenous tribal members of the Grand Bayou Village, this article argues that marginalized landscapes and livelihoods have been structurally made to become untenable within the economic bounds of disaster recovery. Under these circumstances, Louisiana’s coastal communities continue to assert survivance within precarious environments, offering alternative narratives to blind optimism or defeatism for living in an age of climate crisis.
... Indigenous peoples commonly understand their vulnerability to climate change as an intensification of colonially induced environmental changes. Indigenous climate change studies are a new and growing academic field and involve many types of work like resiliency plans, such as the Salish Kootenai Tribe's Climate Change Strategic Plan, the Inuit Petition expressing the right to be cold and conferences such as Climate Changed by Indigenous Peoples Climate Change Working Group (Whyte, 2017). ...
Article
The impact of wildfires in Sweden, commonly claimed to be caused by climate change, has recently become a national and international concern. The overall aim of the inter- and supradisciplinary research project presented in this article is to analyse, document and draw attention to the local and Indigenous/Sámi stewardship of land, with specific regard to fire management, drought, and other aspects of climate change. The project situated within the growing field of Indigenous Land Based Education and Knowledge (Wildcat et al., 2014). It is run by an experienced artist and researcher in collaboration with Indigenous Sámi communities and Indigenous Sámi academic scholars. The project brings together the disciplines of artistic research and visual documentation with the history of technology and science, environmental history, feminist technoscience, gender research and Indigenous methodologies as well as Sámi knowledge. Based on the methods available within these research disciplines, the project uses extensive fieldwork, archival research, and audio-visual documentation, including interviews, documents, drone images, photographs, writings, and workshops, as a source of research, communication, and dissemination. We investigate local and Sámi ecological knowledge available. Furthermore, we evaluate how artistic research and visual documentation -with a critical approach and developed collaboratively- can be used to document, analyse, discuss and provide a basis for promoting Indigenous knowledges in the nation state and climate change debate.
Article
Forensic anthropology has matured into a formidable and fully fledged discipline that includes specialty graduate programs, diversified employment opportunities, an expanding scope, and improved regulation. As part of this maturity, and in step with other branches of science and the humanities, forensic anthropology has also experienced an upswing in discourse on decolonization and decoloniality. From its inception and throughout its history, anthropology has been a colonial venture that observes humans under a Western gaze. As a critique of the universality and superiority of Western systems of knowledge, the decolonial turn constitutes alternative ways of thinking and doing and provides space for these epistemes to circulate and thrive. In this synthesis, decolonization efforts within forensic anthropology are organized into five “C's” of appraisal: categories, casework, curricula, competence, and collections. Namely, these efforts feature the debates around sex, ancestry, and structural vulnerability estimation (categories); the expansion of humanitarian action and community involvement and the challenges to positivism, neutrality, and objectivity (casework); the assessment of how we educate, train, and value expertise (curricula and competence); and the interrogation of how we extract knowledge from the dead (collections). From the undercurrents of these five, a sixth C, care, is unveiled. Given the academic and practical value of forensic anthropology, especially vis‐à‐vis its consequences for colonized peoples, these discourses become imperative for the continued relevance of a colonialist field in a postcolonial world.
Article
Canadian Arctic residents are experiencing longer open water seasons and observing significant change in aquatic species and habitats. Rapid ecosystem change threatens Inuit people’s food security and adds to existing generational trauma caused by ongoing colonialism and industrialization. Indigenous owned environmental monitoring programs prioritize safety, support community empowerment and self-determination to increase the understanding of and resilience to the impacts of this human caused global climate crisis. To this end, in 2019 local expert fishers and hunters from the Inuvialuit Settlement Region worked collaboratively with an independent research scientist to start up community owned aquatic monitoring and observation (AMO) programs in Sachs Harbour and Ulukhaktok in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region. The field teams received training to collect year-round data of lake and coastal water quality data using scientific instruments that measure water temperature, conductivity/salinity, turbidity and dissolved oxygen with depth from the surface down to 150 meters. ROV’s, drones and hydrophones extend observations and Traditional & Local Knowledge (TLK) directs the programs. External clients can hire the teams to augment core funding. AMO teams are finalizing their program and data ownership protocols, which are informed by the Canadian UNDRIP Act and OCAP® principles. Indigenous owned, directed and operated environmental monitoring programs justly deserve funding priority and ongoing public support to help conserve and protect critical areas for future generations.
Article
The urgency of climate change has brought democracy to a critical juncture. Existing democratic systems struggle to address the pressing time frames required for effective climate action. This article explores a fundamental shift in temporal orientation caused by climate change. Democracy’s linear and progressive image of time clashes with the expanding scales of temporality, encompassing both planetary and microscopic processes. More specifically, the article examines the theoretical links between democracy, climate change, and time in the Anthropocene through empirical engagements with the climate politics associated with deliberative assemblies, community organizing, and activist movements. The core argument is that within these democratic innovations, new future-oriented responses to the crises are beginning to emerge. These innovations experiment with extending democracy’s temporal image beyond its conventional boundaries, paving the way for a multi-trajectory democratic politics. The article concludes by discussing the tensions and potential consequences of these democratic practices, ultimately arguing in favor of a multiple and layered understanding of democratic time that extends beyond distinctly human temporalities.
Technical Report
Full-text available
A growing body of literature examines the vulnerability, risk, resilience, and adaptation of indigenous peoples to climate change. This synthesis of literature brings together research pertaining to the impacts of climate change on sovereignty, culture, health, and economies that are currently being experienced by Alaska Native and American Indian tribes and other indigenous communities in the United States. The knowledge and science of how climate change impacts are affecting indigenous peoples contributes to the development of policies, plans, and programs for adapting to climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This report defines and describes the key frameworks that inform indigenous understandings of climate change impacts and pathways for adaptation and mitigation, namely, tribal sovereignty and self-determination, culture and cultural identity, and indigenous community health indicators. It also provides a comprehensive synthesis of climate knowledge, science, and strategies that indigenous communities are exploring, as well as an understanding of the gaps in research on these issues. This literature synthesis is intended to make a contribution to future efforts such as the 4th National Climate Assessment, while serving as a resource for future research, tribal and agency climate initiatives, and policy development.
Article
Full-text available
Vinyeta, Kirsten; Powys Whyte, Kyle; Lynn, Kathy. 2015. Climate change through an intersectional lens: gendered vulnerability and resilience in indigenous communities in the United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-923. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 72 p. The scientific and policy literature on climate change increasingly recognizes the vulnerabilities of indigenous communities and their capacities for resilience. The role of gender in defining how indigenous peoples experience climate change in the United States is a research area that deserves more attention. Advancing climate change threatens the continuance of many indigenous cultural systems that are based on reciprocal relationships with local plants, animals, and ecosystems. These reciprocal relationships, and the responsibilities associated with them, are gendered in many indigenous communities. American Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians experience colonization based on intersecting layers of oppression in which race and gender are major determinants. The coupling of climate change with settler colonialism is the source of unique vulnerabilities. At the same time, gendered knowledge and gender-based activism and initiatives may foster climate change resilience. In this literature synthesis, we cross-reference international literature on gender and climate change, literature on indigenous peoples and cli- mate change, and literature describing gender roles in Native America, in order to build an understanding of how gendered indigeneity may influence climate change vulnerability and resilience in indigenous communities in the United States.
Technical Report
Full-text available
The scientific and policy literature on climate change increasingly recognizes the vulnerabilities of indigenous communities and their capacities for resilience. The role of gender in defining how indigenous people experience climate change in the United States is a research area that deserves more attention. Advancing climate change threatens the continuance of many indigenous cultural systems that are based on reciprocal relationships with local plants, animals, and ecosystems. These reciprocal relationships, and the responsibilities associated with them, are gendered in many indigenous communities. American Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians experience colonization based on intersecting layers of oppression in which race and gender are major determinants. The coupling of climate change with settler colonialism is the source of unique vulnerabilities. At the same time, gendered knowledge and gender-based activism and initiatives may foster climate change resilience. In this literature synthesis, we cross-reference international literature on gender and climate change, literature on indigenous peoples and climate change, and literature describing gender roles in Native America, in order to build an understanding of how gendered indigeneity may influence climate change vulnerability and resilience in indigenous communities in the United States.
Article
Full-text available
Indigenous communities in the Arctic have become increasingly characterized as "vulnerable" in the context of climate change research. We question the use and application of this term in light of the potential consequences it may bring for indigenous peoples. First, the label "vulnerable" is often generated by those who are more or less unfamiliar with the complexities of local culture, economies, and capabilities. Second, we are concerned that such labels can generate misguided actions and policy responses built on how peoples and places come to be seen and understood by others. Third, the label "vulnerable" has the potential to shape how northern indigenous peoples come to see themselves as they construct their own identities-and identifying themselves as vulnerable may ultimately hinder their efforts to gain greater autonomy over their own affairs. As researchers become more engaged in the social dimensions of climate-change research, we encourage more careful and critical attention to the power and potential peril of community labels.
Article
This article will examine how agency is circulated through human and non-human worlds in the creation and maintenance of society from an Indigenous point of view. Through processes of colonization, the corruption of essential categories of Indigenous conceptions of the world (the feminine and land) has led to a disconnect between how this agency is manifested in Indigenous societies. Through a comparison between the epistemological-ontological divide and an Indigenous conception of Place-Thought, this article will argue that agency has erroneously become exclusive to humans, thereby removing non-human agency from what constitutes a society. This is accomplished in part by mythologizing Indigenous origin stories and separating out communication, treaty-making, and historical agreements that human beings held with the animal world, the sky world, the spirit world, etc. In order for colonialism to operationalize itself, it must attempt to make Indigenous peoples stand in disbelief of themselves and their histories. This article attempts to reaffirm this sacred connection between place, non-human and human in an effort to access the “pre-colonial mind”.
Article
Among indigenous people around the world, human trafficking is taking a tremendous toll. While trafficking is not an exclusively indigenous issue, disproportionately large numbers of indigenous people, particularly women, are modern trafficking victims. In Canada, several groups concerned about human trafficking have conducted studies primarily focused on the sex trade because many sex workers are actually trafficking victims under both domestic and international legal standards. These studies found that First Nations women and youth represent between 70 and 90% of the visible sex trade in areas where the Aboriginal population is less than 10%. Very few comparable studies have been conducted in the United States, but studies in both Minnesota and Alaska found similar statistics among U.S. indigenous women. With the current interest in resource extraction, and other opportunities in the warming Arctic, people from outside regions are traveling north in growing numbers. This rise in outside interactions increases the risk that the indigenous women may be trafficked. Recent crime reports from areas that have had an influx of outsiders such as Williston, North Dakota, U.S. and Fort McMurray, Alberta, Canada, both part of the new oil boom, demonstrate the potential risks that any group faces when people with no community accountability enter an area. The combination of development in rural locations, the demographic shift of outsiders moving to the north, and the lack of close monitoring in this circumpolar area is a potential recipe for disaster for indigenous women in the region. This paper suggests that in order to protect indigenous women, countries and indigenous nations must acknowledge this risk and plan for ways to mitigate risk factors.
Book
It is one of the world's cruelest ironies that some of the earliest effects of climate change are being felt by indigenous populations around the world, even though they contributed no more than trivial amounts of the greenhouse gases that are at the root of much of the problem, and they are so politically and economically powerless that they played no role in the decisions that have led to their plight. At the same time, many of these populations are victimized by certain actions designed to reduce emissions, such as land clearing for biofuels cultivation, and restrictions on forest use. Professors Abate and Kronk have assembled a formidable collection of experts from around the world who demonstrate the diversity of challenges facing these indigenous peoples, and the opportunities and challenges in using various international and domestic legal tools to seek redress. This book will be an invaluable resource for all those examining the legal remedies that may be available, either now or as the law develops in the years to come.' © The Editors and Contributors Severally 2013. All rights reserved.
Book
With a long history and deep connection to the Earth's resources, indigenous peoples have an intimate understanding and ability to observe the impacts linked to climate change. Traditional ecological knowledge and tribal experience play a key role in developing future scientific solutions for adaptation to the impacts. The book explores climate-related issues for indigenous communities in the United States, including loss of traditional knowledge, forests and ecosystems, food security and traditional foods, as well as water, Arctic sea ice loss, permafrost thaw and relocation. The book also highlights how tribal communities and programs are responding to the changing environments. Fifty authors from tribal communities, academia, government agencies and NGOs contributed to the book. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland. All rights reserved.
Book
Indigenous nations are on the frontline of the climate crisis of the twenty-first century. With cultures and economies among the most vulnerable to climate-related catastrophes, Native peoples are developing responses to climate change that serve as a model for Native and non-Native communities alike. Native American tribes in the Pacific Northwest and Indigenous peoples around the Pacific Rim have already been deeply affected by droughts, flooding, reduced glaciers and snowmelts, seasonal shifts in winds and storms, and the northward shifting of species on the land and in the ocean. Having survived the historical and ecological wounds inflicted by colonization, industrialization, and urbanization, Indigenous peoples are using tools of resilience that have enabled them to respond to sudden environmental changes. They are creating defenses to harden their communities, mitigate losses, and adapt where possible. Asserting Native Resilience presents a rich variety of perspectives on Indigenous responses to the climate crisis, reflecting the voices of more than twenty contributors, including tribal leaders, Native and non-Native scientists, scholars, and activists from the Pacific Northwest, British Columbia, Alaska, and Aotearoa / New Zealand. Also included is a resource directory of Indigenous governments, NGOs, and communities that are researching and responding to climate change and a community organizing booklet for use by Northwest tribes. An invaluable addition to the literature on climate change, Asserting Native Resilience will be useful for students of environmental studies, Native studies, geography, and rural sociology, and will serve as an important reference for Indigenous leaders, tribal members, and environmental agency staff.