Content uploaded by Ritu Chandra
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ritu Chandra on Sep 23, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
13
International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR) Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2015
I. INTRODUCTION
Plato has rightly said
“Do not train students to learning by force and harshness, but
direct them to it by what amuses their mind, so that you may
be better able to discover with accuracy the peculiar bent of
the genius of each.”
Teaching is not controlling, but rather working with the
students to learn, grow, and succeed together. By having
strong student-teacher relationships with students, the
classroom will be a place for each member to express their
feelings and work together. Academic success depends on
these close relationships and guidance that teachers and
students have with one another.
Classroom management aims at establishing student self-
control through a process of promoting positive student
achievement and behavior. Thus, academic achievement,
teacher efficacy, and teacher and student behavior are directly
linked with the concept of classroom management.
Educators have always rated discipline as one of the most
serious obstacles to promoting effective teaching. Proper
Classroom management leads to class control and conducive
teaching learning environment.
According to Evertson and Weinstein (2006)
Classroom management has two distinct purposes:
“It not only seeks to establish and sustain an orderly
environment so students can engage in meaningful academic
learning, it also aims to enhance student social and moral
growth” (p. 4).
Classroom management is a multi-faceted activity and
extends beyond the traditional behavior management
techniques recommended to deal with students with
disruptive behavior. Teachers should develop caring,
supportive relationships with and among students; organize
and implement instruction in ways that optimize students’
access to learning; they may use group management methods
that encourage student engagement with academic tasks;
promote the development of student social skills and self-
regulation; and use appropriate interventions to assist
students who have behavior problems.
Jacob Kounin also believed that if students were engaged in
their lessons, they would be less likely to misbehave. Other
theorists who believed this as well were Glasser, Curwin, and
Medler. If lessons are precise and completed at a steady
continuous pace, students will have little time to misbehave
or to get into conflicts. When students are engaged, they are
concentrating on the lesson and focus on learning, and it
prevents problems. It is important for the students to be part of
the decision-making processes. If students are having fun,
they will be engaged. When they are engaged in a lesson, they
will not think about misbehaving, and will be focused on the
task.
According to Spencer Kagan, students should play an active
role in setting classroom rules. By allowing the students to
help create the rules, the students are participating in
classroom community building. Everyone is working
together and is able to clearly understand the rules .
Canter believed that parents need to be informed from day
one about behavior and both positive and negative
consequences should be shared with parents and guardians.
Parents should know how their children are behaving in class,
whether it is good or bad. By keeping in touch with letters and
notes, emails, or phone calls, parents will feel as if they are
important to their child’s success in the classroom. If parents
do not feel important to their children’s education, or
welcome in the classroom, the students will suffer.There
must be a good teacher-parent relationship so that everyone is
on the same page to support the student’s needs. If there is no
support at home, the student will struggle in the classroom.
II. PROBLEMS OF CLASSROOM
Indiscipline is a problem normally faced by teachers which
creates a hindrance in teaching process. Due to indiscipline
[1]Assistant Professor, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Lko-Dewa Road
Classroom Management for Effective Teaching
[1]
Ritu Chandra
Abstract:
Teachers play a major role for effective class conduction. It is the responsibility of the teacher to make his /her class interesting
so that students are keen to attend and participate in the class. Some of the teachers keep complaining about the class which they
teach. The problem is normally related to student’s behaviour and discipline. Such students miss out on learning. They usually
bunk or are irregular to class. They don’t even bother to be present for the class. So many students today just don’t value their
education. If we suspend such students for bunking class they don’t seem to care at all. Sitting at home doesn’t change their
attitude. Maybe a fresh look at the approach to Classroom management is required. But why we as a teacher are losing our grip
with the classes? This paper focuses on the problems, reasons and suggestions for effective class management.
Keywords: classroom management, Discipline, With-it-ness, ripple effect
14
International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR) Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2015
situation students arrive late for class, are not punctual for the
classes or simply bunk classes as the class is not very
interesting or rather as a teacher we are unable to create
interest in the class .This may be a result of lack of lesson
planning .At times effective management of time is also
overlooked. Non verbal cues like body language and
communication skills also play a major role in making the
class effective.
Problems of Classroom Management can be overcome by
being prepared for class, motivating the students, providing a
comfortable learning environment, building students’ self
esteem, being creative and imaginative in daily lessons. A
teacher should not carry personal problems to the class by
being impulsive. There must be Willingness of the teacher to
accept responsibility for classroom control and Long-term,
solution-oriented approaches to problems.
III. TECHNIQUES FOR BETTER
CLASSROOM CONTROL
Teacher needs to Focus attention on entire class and must not
talk over student chatter. At times Silence can be effective.
Students should know what is going to happen in the class and
monitored to check progress. Teacher should move around
the room so students have to pay attention more readily and
give students non-verbal cues. Lessons should be planned to
ensure that the period is filled with learning activities.
Teacher should have a knack to memorize student names as
quickly as possible. It enhances class control and confidence
of the teacher. Few techniques are mentioned below;
IV. WITH-IT-NESS
With-it-ness refers to a teacher’s awareness of what is going
on in the classroom behaviors before they get out of line,
keeping learners on tasks. Many problems occur during
transitions. Theorist Jacob Kounin stressed the importance of
“with-it-ness,” which is the idea that the teacher knows what
is going on in their classroom at all times. They understand
the importance of having a close eye on students. Teachers
who have “with-it-ness” are able to spot areas where
misbehavior may arise, when students are upset, and are able
correct problem behaviors before they cause major distress to
the classroom. These teachers are able to manage their
classrooms at all times and prevent problems from occurring
or expanding. In a community of learners, it is the duty of the
teacher to make sure everything runs smoothly for students
by being able to spot problems.
V. RIPPLE EFFECT
Jacob Kounin created the idea of the “ripple effect.” The idea
is that if one student sustains positive or negative
consequences, the rest of the class will see what is taking
place and a ripple effect will occur.. From experience, when
one student misbehaves others will join in as well. On the
other hand, a student receiving a reward will motivate others.
Managing students’ behavior in positive ways is the key to
success. Students learn from others around them, and by
believing in the ripple effect, we will be able to manage
behaviors.
VI. MODEL CLASSROOM
The Canters believed that teachers should teach and model
classroom behaviors. By doing so, students are able to
visually see what is expected and what is not allowed in the
classroom. This is important so that students fully understand
what it looks like to participate in positive behavior
management. Students will learn to be responsible managers
of their behavior by seeing others do what is expected.
When students misbehave, it is important to sit down with the
student and counsel. By having close student-teacher
relationships, we will be able to get to the cause of the
behavior and help the student come up with alternatives to
prevent the unwanted behavior from occurring in the future.
B.F. Skinner gave Behavior Modification theory and
believed that behavior is shaped through systematic
reinforcement and punishment has limited effects. Likewise
William Glasser contributed Choice Theory which
emphasizes human behavior is purposeful (Charles
2011).Students are responsible for their own behavior. The
basic needs of students must be met. Jacob Kounin
emphasised on Lesson Management to prevent misbehavior.
Rudolph Dreikurs proclaimed human needs & democratic
classrooms He believed that students have a need for
belonging. Believed that misbehavior occurs when needs are
not metand moreover democratic classrooms support
effective learning. Lee & Marlene Canter focused on
Assertive Discipline, Students have the right to learn in a
calm, organized classroom and teachers have the right to
teach in a classroom free of interruption and misbehavior.
Assertive teachers model classroom expectations clearly,
confidently and consistently. Alfie Kohn Learning
Communities believes that traditional instruction is
ineffective and meaningful learning takes place when
students have choice, feel respected, feel like a part of
something, and can construct their own learning.
VII. CONCLUSION
The Role of a Teacher is not to grade a student and to control
but the main role of the teacher is to help every student reach
the highest possible level of achievement. The long-term goal
of any classroom management program is self-management.
The procedures typically involve the use o of PBS f positive
reinforcement, negative reinforcement and time to time
interventions. Effective classroom management must be
aligned with instructional goals and activities. Brophy
(2006) noted that when teachers identify what good student
behavior looks like; they can work backwards from desired
outcomes to determine which management systems will be
most effective. Arriving in class and being in one’s seat on
time, being prepared for a lesson, paying attention,
volunteering information and responding to questions lead to
effective class control. Accepted behaviors may vary for
different classroom and unique strategies may be adopted for
different contexts and environments that emerge in
classrooms.
15
International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR) Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2015
[14] Freiberg, H. J., & Lapointe, J. M. (2006). Research-
based programs for preventing and solving discipline
problems. In C. Evertson and C. S. Weinstein (Eds.).
Handbook of classroom management: Research,
practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 735-786).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[15] Gettinger, M. (1988). Methods of proactive classroom
management. School Psychology Review, 17, 227-242.
[16] Gettinger, M., & Kohler, K. (2006). Process-outcome
approaches to classroom management and effective
teaching. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.),
Handbook of classroom management: Research,
practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 73-96).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[17] Gottfredson, D., Gottfredson, G., & Hybl, L. (1993).
Managing adolescent behavior: A multiyear multischool
study. American Educational Research Journal, 30,
179-215.
[18] Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group
management in classrooms. New York: Holt,
Reinhardt & Winston.
[19] Lewis, T. J., Newcomer, L. L., Trussell, R., & Richter,
M. (2006) Schooolwide positive behavior support:
Building systems to develop and maintain appropriate
social behavior. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein
(Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research,
practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 833-854).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[20] Pianta, R. C. (2006). Classroom management and
re lati onsh ips be twee n chil dren and te ache rs:
Implications for research and practice. In C. M.
Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of
classroom management: Research, practice, and
contemporary issues (pp. 685-710). Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[21] Reeve, J. (2006) Extrinsic rewards and inner
motivation. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.),
Handbook of classroom management: Research,
practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 645-664).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[22] Robinson, S. L., & Griesemer, S. M. R. (2006) Helping
individual students with problem behavior. In C. M.
Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of
classroom management: Research, practice, and
contemporary issues (pp. 787-802). Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[23] Rose, L. C., & Gallup, A. M. (2006). The 38th annual Phi
Delta Kappa/ Gallup Poll of the public's attitudes toward
the public schools, Phi Delta Kappan, 88,41-56.
[24] Soodak, L. C, & McCarthy, M. R. (2006). Classroom
management in inclusive settings. In C. M. Evertson &
C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom
management: Research, practice, and contemporary
issues (pp. 461-490). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
VIII. REFERENCE
[1] Froyen, L. A., & Iverson, A. M. (1999). Schoolwide and
classroom management: The reflective educator-leader
(3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[2] Bear, G. G., & Watkins, J. M. (2006). Developing self-
discipline. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.),
Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and
in terv entio n (pp. 2 9-44 ) . Wash ingto n, DC:
APA/NASP.
[3] Brophy, J. (2006). History of research on classroom
management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein
(Eds.), H and book of classroom ma nag ement:
Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 17-
43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Brophy, J., & Evertson, C. (1978). Context variables in
teaching. Educational Psychologist, 12, 310-316.
[5] Crone, D. H., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Building positive
behavior support systems in schools: Functional
behavioral assessment. New York: Guilford.
[6] Crone, D. H., Horner, R. H., & Hawken, L. S. (2004).
Responding to behavior problems in schools: The
behavior education program. New York: Guilford.
[7] Emmer, E., Evertson, C., & Anderson, L. (1980).
Effective classroom management at the beginning of the
school year. Elementary School Journal, 80, 219-231.
[8] Emmer, E. T., & Gerwels, M. C. (2006). Classroom
management in middle and high school classrooms. In
C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of
classroom management: Research, practice, and
contemporary issues (pp. 407-438. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[9] Evertson, C., & Emmer, E. (1982a). Effective
management at the beginning of the school year in junior
high classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74,
485-498.
[10] Evertson, C., & Emmer, E. (1982b). Preventive
classroom management. In D. Duke (Ed.), Helping
teachers manage classrooms (pp. 2-31). Alexandria,
VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
[11] Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Classroom
management as a field of inquiry. In C. M. Evertson &
C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom
management: Research, practice, and contemporary
issues (pp. 3-16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
[12] Freiberg, H. J. (1999). Contingency management and
cooperative discipline: From tourists to citizens in the
classrooms. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond
behaviorism: Changing the classroom management
paradigm (pp. 75-97). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[13] Freiberg, H. J., Stein, T., & Huang, S. (1995). Effects of
a classroom management intervention on student
achievement in inner-city elementary schools.
Educational Research and Evaluation: An International
Journal on Theory and Practice, 1, 36-66.