ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Social-Emotional Competence: An Essential Factor for Promoting Positive Adjustment and Reducing Risk in School Children


Abstract and Figures

Social-emotional competence is a critical factor to target with universal preventive interventions that are conducted in schools because the construct (a) associates with social, behavioral, and academic outcomes that are important for healthy development; (b) predicts important life outcomes in adulthood; (c) can be improved with feasible and cost-effective interventions; and (d) plays a critical role in the behavior change process. This article reviews this research and what is known about effective intervention approaches. Based on that, an intervention model is proposed for how schools should enhance the social and emotional learning of students in order to promote resilience. Suggestions are also offered for how to support implementation of this intervention model at scale.
Content may be subject to copyright.
This article is part of a special section entitled Developmental Research and Trans-
lational Science: Evidence-based Interventions for At-risk Youth and Families,
edited by Suniya S. Luthar and Nancy Eisenberg.
Social-Emotional Competence: An Essential Factor for Promoting Positive
Adjustment and Reducing Risk in School Children
Celene E. Domitrovich
Georgetown University and The Pennsylvania State Univer-
sity and Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional
Learning (CASEL)
Joseph A. Durlak
Loyola University
Katharine C. Staley
The Pennsylvania State University
Roger P. Weissberg
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning
(CASEL) and University of Illinois at Chicago
Social-emotional competence is a critical factor to target with universal preventive interventions that are con-
ducted in schools because the construct (a) associates with social, behavioral, and academic outcomes that are
important for healthy development; (b) predicts important life outcomes in adulthood; (c) can be improved
with feasible and cost-effective interventions; and (d) plays a critical role in the behavior change process. This
article reviews this research and what is known about effective intervention approaches. Based on that, an
intervention model is proposed for how schools should enhance the social and emotional learning of students
in order to promote resilience. Suggestions are also offered for how to support implementation of this inter-
vention model at scale.
This special issue of Child Development focuses on
research that informs the development of interven-
tions that maximize the well-being of at-risk chil-
dren. Authors identify and justify what they believe
are the most important variables to concentrate on
to reduce risk and increase protection for youth.
We have chosen social-emotional competence, a
multidimensional construct that is critical to success
in school and life for all children, including those at
risk due to economic disadvantage, minority status,
and early emotional or behavioral problems.
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is the pro-
cess through which social-emotional competence
develops. Through SEL, children and youth acquire
and effectively apply the knowledge, attitudes, and
skills necessary to understand and manage emo-
tions, set and achieve positive goals, feel and show
empathy for others, establish and maintain positive
relationships, and make responsible decisions
(Weissberg, Durlak, Domitrovich, & Gullotta, 2015).
The knowledge, skills, and attitudes that are needed
to demonstrate social-emotional competence require
integration across affective, cognitive, and behav-
ioral systems (Beauchamp & Anderson, 2010;
Greenberg et al., 2003). It can be helpful to frame
the broad construct of social-emotional competence
into two domains, that of intrapersonal and interper-
sonal competencies; this serves to better organize the
This article is supported by grants from the Einhorn Family
Charitable Trust, 1440 Foundation, and NoVo Foundation
awarded to Roger P. Weissberg. Celene E. Domitrovich is an
author of the PATHS Curriculum and has a royalty agreement
with Channing-Bete, Inc., which is reviewed and managed by
Penn States Individual Conict of Interest Committee.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
Celene E. Domitrovich, Center for Child and Human Develop-
ment, Georgetown University, 3303 Whitehaven Street NW, Suite
3300, Washington, DC 20007. Electronic mail may be sent to
©2017 The Authors
Child Development ©2017 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
All rights reserved. 0009-3920/2017/xxxx-xxxx
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12739
Child Development, xxxx 2017, Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 19
multitude of terms and denitions that align with SEL
(Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional
Learning, 2013, 2015; Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012). As
such, intrapersonal skills (e.g., realistic goal setting,
positive mindsets, self-control, emotion regulation,
and coping strategies) are those that are needed for
globally effective functioning as an individual,
whereas interpersonal skills (e.g., listening, communi-
cation, perspective taking, negotiation, and social
problem solving) are those that are needed to interact
successfully with others. In this article, we review the
research and the outcomes illustrating effective SEL
interventions using this organizing lens.
Individuals who thrive developmentally despite
being exposed to high levels of risk are referred to as
manifesting or demonstrating resilience (Luthar, Cic-
chetti, & Becker, 2000). We focus on social-emotional
competence because of the empirical evidence that it
is an individual characteristic that is critical for
healthy development and for counteracting the nega-
tive effects of exposure to risk. The review of the
research evidence justifying our selection is organized
into three levels. The rst is longitudinal research
demonstrating that social-emotional competence is a
promotive factor associated with success in key devel-
opmental tasks over time, and that decits in this area
of functioning are associated with poor outcomes
over time. There is also evidence that social-emotional
competence is a protective factor moderating the rela-
tionship between a number of individual risk factors
and developmentally signicant outcomes.
The second level of evidence comes from research
on interventions designed to promote social-emo-
tional competence. These studies document the mal-
leability of the construct, that positive effects from
interventions endure over time, and that these inter-
ventions are feasible and can be very cost-effective.
The third level of evidence comes from studies of
interventions designed to promote student adjust-
ment that show how social-emotional competence
mediates the relationship between identied risk fac-
tors and developmentally signicant outcomes. After
summarizing the evidence, our review will describe
common intervention approaches used by programs
that target the development of social-emotional com-
petence and meta-analytic research regarding the rel-
ative effectiveness of different approaches. The article
ends with a description of an intervention strategy
and recommendations for implementing at scale.
We limit our review to universal interventions
delivered in schools because, as prevention scien-
tists, we are dedicated to intervening before the
effects of risk exposure are evident in childrens
functioning. Prevention is grounded in a public
health approach to addressing the needs of vulnera-
ble populations and, by denition, involves the
combination of universal, selected, and indicated
intervention approaches (OConnell, Boat, & War-
ner, 2009). As the rst level of intervention in edu-
cational systems, universal interventions that
promote social-emotional competence can raise the
overall level of adjustment for all schoolchildren
and provide guidance for more intensive services
for those in need of further assistance (Greenberg,
Domitrovich, Weissberg, & Durlak, in press).
Universal interventions are likely to be of much
greater overall public health benet than interven-
tions that only target those with current problems
(Greenberg et al., in press). This is because epidemi-
ological research on several types of negative out-
comes indicates that the general total population
will eventually develop more instances of various
problems than a subpopulation of that total which
is currently having some difculties. It is a matter
of population size and the probabilities of later dys-
function. For example, consider the current popula-
tion of 50.1 million schoolchildren in the United
States (Population A) of which approximately 20%
(10 million, Population B) currently manifest some
adjustment problems of at least a fairly serious
degree. Suppose that 30% of Population B continues
to have problems over time, but only 10% of Popu-
lation A develops problems later in life (which are
reasonable projections). Based on these projections,
Population A will eventually contain 2 million more
individuals with later adjustment problems than
Population B (5 vs. 3 million). Even if universal
intervention was successful in preventing later
problems for a modest percentage of youth, it
would still have a major public health impact.
Of course, those who are already manifesting
problems require attention, but our argument to
focus on universal school-based programs is in the
spirit of this special issue, that is, the improvement of
the overall level of health in our society. This is possi-
ble through interventions that enhance social-emo-
tional competence. We show that these interventions
are helpful for groups of schoolchildren who are at
risk due to their geographic or demographic charac-
teristics (i.e., members of a minority group or those
of lower socioeconomic status) or their behavior (i.e.,
temperament or level of disruptive behavior).
Level 1: Longitudinal Research
There is growing interest in the role that social-
emotional competence has on students both while
2 Domitrovich, Durlak, Staley, and Weissberg
they are in school and when they are adults (Far-
rington et al., 2012; Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012).
There is considerable evidence indicating that both
intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies
enhance the ability of youth to behave appropri-
ately, avoid risk behaviors, develop healthy rela-
tionships with adults and peers, and achieve
academic success (Epstein, Grifn, & Botvin, 2000;
Trentacosta & Fine, 2010). This is especially true for
children who are vulnerable due to higher levels of
behavioral dysregulation or exposure to the numer-
ous risk factors associated with poverty (Elias &
Haynes, 2008; Valiente et al., 2011). Longitudinal
studies document that social-emotional decits are
predictive of problem behaviors including aggres-
sion, delinquency, and substance use (Arsenio,
Adams, & Gold, 2009; Cook, Williams, Guerra,
Kim, & Sadek, 2010; Moftt et al., 2011; Trentacosta
& Fine, 2010).
Educational, psychological, and econometric
research suggests that social-emotional competence
is fundamental to increasing studentspostsec-
ondary performance and completion, to enhancing
workplace success, and for adult life outcomes
including rates of incarceration, marital status, and
levels of depression (Heckman, Stixrud, & Urzua,
2006; Moftt et al., 2011). In a recent analysis of
outcomes in a longitudinal study of racially diverse,
low-income students living in both rural and urban
communities in four states, teacher ratings of stu-
dentsinterpersonal competence made in kinder-
garten were examined in relation to adult outcomes
in multiple domains assessed 1319 years later
(Jones, Greenberg, & Crowley, 2015). After account-
ing for a number of individual and school-level
covariates, higher levels of competence were inver-
sely related to receiving public assistance, being
involved in criminal activity, and substance use
(Jones et al., 2015). Students rated by teachers as
more competent in kindergarten were more likely
to have stable employment at age 25.
Level 2: School-Based Intervention Research
Space does not allow us to review results for
all interventions. Table 1 summarizes the ndings
from ve representative meta-analyses of
school-based interventions targeting different com-
binations of social-emotional competencies. There is
some overlap in the studies, but collectively, these
reviews cover over 300 published and unpublished
studies involving over 300,000 students. For the
sake of comparison, the mean effect obtained on
measures of aggression and disruptive behavior is
presented as well as the ndings for several poten-
tial moderators of that outcome were examined in
these reviews.
The ndings are fairly consistent with respect to
the mean posttest effect size (ranging from .21 to
.26). Of note, the Taylor, Oberle, Durlak, and Weiss-
berg (in press) meta-analysis of 82 SEL studies
found that signicant positive effects on disruptive
behaviors were obtained at a mean follow-up per-
iod of 2 years, indicating the durability of effects
over time. Moreover, the strongest predictor of fol-
low-up effects was the mean effect at posttest
reecting the level of studentssocial-emotional
competence. In other words, students with higher
levels of social-emotional competence at the end of
intervention fared the best over the longer term.
In addition to the ndings for aggressive and
disruptive behaviors noted in Table 1, meta-ana-
lyses of school-based social competence interven-
tions have also reported signicant positive effects
at posttest for other outcomes that are important
for healthy development including academic perfor-
mance, positive social behaviors, drug use, and
Table 1
Major Findings From Meta-Analyses of Universal School-Based Programs Using the Promotion of Social-Emotional Competence To Promote Posi-
tive Adjustment and Reduce Risk
Moderating variables Outcome
Gender Ethnicity SES Age Risk Location Problem behavior
Barnes et al. (2014) No .23
Durlak et al. (2011) No No No .22
Garrard and Lipsey (2007) No No Older>No .26
Taylor et al. (in press) No No .14
Wilson and Lipsey (2007) No No Lower>.21
Note. Blank cell means that variable was not analyzed as a potential moderator; No indicates the variable did not emerge as a signi-
cant moderator. Older> means students aged 1417 did better than those 59or1013. Lower> means children at low SES level did
better than their middle SES peers. Location in Durlak et al. (2011) referred to urban, suburban, or rural schools.
Process of Social and Emotional Learning 3
emotional distress (Durlak, Weissberg, Dymnicki,
Taylor, & Schellinger, 2011; January, Casey, & Paul-
son, 2011; Korpershoek, Harms, de Boer, van Kuijk,
& Doolaard, 2016; Sklad, Diekstra, Ritter, Ben, &
Gravesteijn, 2012).
Of interest is whether interventions are more
effective for some participants than others. Overall,
the data in Table 1 reect that intervention effects
were comparable for students of different ethnicities
(examined in all ve reviews) and for both genders
(assessed in three of the ve). In other cases, stu-
dentssocioeconomic status either did not make a
difference (Durlak et al., 2011) or favored those
from a lower as compared to a middle economic
class (Wilson & Lipsey, 2007). Initially, age emerged
as a moderator in four of the ve reviews but only
remained signicant in one after the relative inu-
ence of other variables was assessed (Garrard &
Lipsey, 2007). School location, in urban, suburban,
or rural settings, was examined in one study but
was not a signicant factor (Durlak et al., 2011).
Only one review examined behavioral risk levels
coded as the combination of initial problems and
attendance at an inner city school but did not nd
it to be a moderating factor (Garrard & Lipsey,
2007). In general, the results from Table 1 suggest
that school-based social-emotional competence
interventions are suitable and effective for all stu-
dents, and in some cases, these interventions were
more favorable for students from low-income fami-
lies (Durlak et al., 2011).
Level 3: Research Examining Intervention
One way to conrm the importance of social-emo-
tional competence is to demonstrate that it plays an
important role in the behavior change process. This
can be achieved empirically with mediation analyses
conducted in the context of intervention studies or
with meta-analysis by coding program approaches
or characteristics and testing for differential effects.
Intervention studies that examine mediation are lim-
ited, but one review identied nine studies con-
ducted in school-based elementary settings in which
variables responsible for the positive effects on overt
aggression were identied (Dymnicki, Weissberg, &
Henry, 2011). In seven of these nine studies, social-
emotional competencies were a key change mecha-
nism. These included the acquisition of attitudes
favoring prosocial over aggressive solutions to prob-
lems, and skills related to social problem solving,
conict resolution, and interpersonal relationships.
A 4-year longitudinal study that took place in
the context of an intervention trial tested the effect
of a combined (i.e., instructional and environmen-
tal) approach to promoting social and emotional
competence and demonstrated with mediation anal-
yses that reductions in violent behavior were a
function of studentsimprovements in competence
(Ngwe, Liu, Flay, Segawa, & the Aban Aya Co-Inves-
tigators, 2004). The study took place in 12 Chicago
schools with a sample of 571 African American male
students who were randomly assigned either to the
intervention or to receive a curriculum that focused
on health-enhancing behaviors from fth through
eighth grades. The competence dimensions that
mediated the intervention effects were behavioral
intentions, attitudes toward aggression, and percep-
tions of peer norms for aggression (Ngwe et al.,
School-Based Intervention Approaches
Interventions vary in their approaches to promoting
studentssocial and emotional competence, and
while some use an eclectic mix of strategies, most
interventions either foster student social and behav-
ioral adjustment directly by teaching student com-
petencies (i.e., social skills training) or indirectly by
creating a positive learning environment that fosters
the development of social-emotional competence
(Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional
Learning, 2013, 2015). Programs that include expli-
cit instruction typically include a sequence of les-
sons offered to the entire class, and focus on the
development of one or more competencies. Lesson
plans usually consist of explanation of the target
skills, a live or videotaped demonstration of their
execution, opportunities for students to practice the
skills through role playing or other exercises, and
then feedback and support to encourage skill mas-
tery. These lessons either stand alone or are inte-
grated with academic instruction (Collaborative for
Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, 2013,
Programs that are designed to create a positive
learning environment typically use classroom or
schoolwide strategies to enhance one of several
indicators of school climate such as (a) the quality
of relationships and support among teachers, stu-
dents, and staff; (b) school safety; and (c) norms
related to respect, diversity, or positive civic values
(Thapa, Cohen, Guffey, & Higgins-DAlessandro,
2013). One of the most common environmental
strategies at the classroom level is to train teachers
4 Domitrovich, Durlak, Staley, and Weissberg
in developmentally appropriate instructional tech-
niques (e.g., cooperative learning), classroom man-
agement, and emotionally supportive teaching
practices (Dusenbury, Calin, Domitrovich, & Weiss-
berg, 2015). School-level strategies take several forms
and may include changing school structures to foster
a sense of community (e.g., smaller class sizes, cre-
ation of special advisories, and organizing special
assemblies), establishing policies (e.g., restorative
discipline) that increase the use of effective teaching
practices by adults, or creating natural opportunities
for students to learn and practice specic social-emo-
tional skills (Dusenbury, Newman, et al., 2015).
Several meta-analyses have attempted to evalu-
ate the advantages of different program approaches
by including these features in their coding systems.
Using this method, there appears to be little evi-
dence that one approach is superior to another. In a
meta-analysis by Garrard and Lipsey (2007), conict
education programs were coded according to the
method by which they helped students learn to
manage interpersonal conicts. These included
direct instruction, peer mediation, and embedding
concepts and strategies into the academic curricu-
lum. There were no signicant differences in effect
sizes by program focus. Similarly, in their meta-
analysis of school-based psychosocial interventions,
Wilson and Lipsey (2007) classied programs
according to whether they used an anger manage-
ment, social problem solving, or social skills train-
ing reecting a behavioral, cognitive, or
interpersonal approach. Effects were similar across
these different treatment modalities.
Korpershoek et al. (2016) used meta-analysis to
assess the relative inuence of major components
present in school-based interventions on different
categories of student outcomes. These authors
examined four components consisting of (a)
attempts to improve teachersclassroom manage-
ment strategies, (b) efforts at improving the quality
of teacherstudent relationships, (c) efforts to
change student behaviors through positive or nega-
tive contingencies, and nally, (d) approaches that
explicitly focused on enhancing studentssocial and
emotional development. Analyses suggested that
the presence of these components was associated
with small but signicant and comparable improve-
ment (mean effect using Hedgesg) in students
behavior (from .21 to .25) and academic performance
(from .17 to .24). However, a focus on studentssocial
and emotional development was the only component
associated with a signicant improvement (.14) in
studentsacademic motivation, and their commit-
ment to and engagement with school.
One meta-analysis categorized interventions in
terms of whether or not they followed four general
practices represented by the acronym, SAFE. These
practices included whether or not the intervention
was: (a) Sequenceda connected and coordinated set of
activities to foster skill development, (b) Activeactive
forms of learning to help students master new skills,
(c) Focusedspecic sections of the intervention
devoted to developing personal and social skills, and
(d) Explicitskills targeted in the program were clearly
identied so students knew what was expected
of them (Durlak et al., 2011). Programs containing
all four of these practices were associated with signi-
cant improvement in studentsprosocial behavior
(e.g., cooperation, helping others), whereas programs
lacking all four features were not effective in this
regard (Hedges gvalues of .24 vs. .02, respectively).
In a meta-analysis of 28 studies of school-based
interventions with elementary-aged students
designed to promote social-emotional competence,
studies were coded as to whether programs used
active (e.g., role play) or passive (e.g., lecture) inter-
vention methods and demonstrated that this was
an important distinction that moderated effects
(January et al., 2011). Programs that used passive
approaches had an overall effect of .12, whereas
those that used active approaches had an overall
effect of .37. This nding is consistent with the ac-
tivecomponent of the SAFE framework.
A Proposed Strategy to Promote Student Social-
Emotional Competence
Authors in this special issue were asked to propose
an intervention strategy based on the factors and
mechanisms they identify as critical to promoting
wellness for at-risk students. Based on the research
reviewed here and what meta-analyses suggest are
the benets of interventions that include an explicit
and active (i.e., SAFE) approach to instruction in
social and emotional skills for younger children, we
advocate for the use of these programs in all grades
from preschool through elementary school (Durlak
et al., 2011; January et al., 2011). There are a num-
ber of programs listed on national registries that
are considered proveneffective with unique pro-
gramming that can be delivered across multiple
years at these developmental levels.
Additional research is needed on the specic
knowledge, skills, and behaviors that should be
absolute priorities for programs to cover in order to
produce a full range of positive outcomes. Compo-
nent analyses of interventions are almost nonexistent
Process of Social and Emotional Learning 5
so for now the most rigorous empirical information
regarding program content is what was coded in
meta-analyses. Until more detailed coding of subdo-
mains of competence (e.g., self-management vs. social
awareness) is conducted, we suggest that schools use
programs that provide coordinated coverage of both
the intrapersonal and interpersonal domains (Collab-
orative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning,
2013, 2015; Greenberg et al., 2003).
There is support from meta-analytic studies to
show that universal interventions focused on pro-
moting social-emotional competence are equally
effective at middle and high school (Durlak et al.,
2011); however, there are also examples of interven-
tions producing unintended negative outcomes (Mul-
tisite Violence Prevention Project, 2009). During
adolescence when students are more susceptible to
the inuence of peers, the intervention delivery struc-
ture is extremely important, and small group formats
may make low-risk students vulnerable to deviance
training (Dodge, Lansford, & Dishion, 2006).
Many universal interventions at this develop-
mental level are designed to be risk reduction
programs that target specic outcomes like violence
or substance use. In these programs, interpersonal
competence often includes resistance skillswhich
help students avoid peer pressure to engage in
risky behavior and its inclusion is important for
program effectiveness (Tobler et al., 2000). One
study used structural equation modeling to exam-
ine how general aspects of social-emotional compe-
tence (decision making and self-efcacy) and
resistance skills related to substance use for inner-
city adolescents (Epstein et al., 2000). They found
that general competence predicted effective use of
refusal skills suggesting that it may be important to
target a broader array of skills in preventive inter-
ventions that target substance use.
When proposing a school-based intervention
strategy to promote wellness for students in middle
and high school, it is important to consider the lit-
erature on school climate because ratings of this
construct are associated with academic functioning,
mental health, and substance use at these develop-
mental levels (Thapa et al., 2013). Perceptions of
school climate evolve out of repeated social interac-
tions and experiences that take place within relation-
ships, physical spaces, and organizational structures.
When these perceptions are positive, they can serve
as a protective factor moderating how studentsde-
cits in social-emotional competence are associated
with poor outcomes. In one longitudinal study of an
ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of
middle school students with decits in intrapersonal
competence (i.e., low self-efcacy and high levels of
self-criticism), studentsperceptions of a positive
school climate reduced the negative effects these
characteristics had on their levels of internalizing
and externalizing symptoms (Kuperminc, Lead-
beater, & Blatt, 2001). These ndings suggest inter-
ventions that combine skills instruction and
strategies to improve school climate may be more
effective. While there are successful examples of this
at the elementary level, more research is needed to
determine how best to create effective models at the
secondary level (Flay, 2000). Research suggests that
denitions of competence, mechanisms of behavior
change, and the outcomes that are relevant to target
may vary by contexts (e.g., afuent vs. disadvan-
taged communities; Luthar & Barkin, 2012).
Taking Interventions to Scale
There are two important factors that favor the
wider use and implementation of universal social-
emotional competence interventions. First, is that
meta-analyses have indicated that these programs
achieve similar (Barnes, Smith, & Miller, 2014) or
better (Durlak et al., 2011) outcomes when they are
conducted by school faculty and staff compared to
those from outside the school system. This indicates
that such programs can be integrated into routine
educational practice. Second, an economic review of
seven SEL programs that have been replicated in
multiple settings found they produced an average
return of $11 for every dollar expended (Beleld
et al., 2015). This indicates that some school-based
interventions are very cost-effective. Nevertheless,
there are major challenges to overcome in attempts
to take successful programs to scale. We cannot dis-
cuss all the issues, but the single most important
factor in scaling up is clear: High-quality program
implementation is essential for maximizing the
effects of evidence-based interventions (Barnes et al.,
2014; Durlak et al., 2011; Wilson & Lipsey, 2007).
High-quality implementation requires that
schools secure professional development services
from program developers who have expertise in the
chosen program. Indeed, one feature of a high-qual-
ity program is that it offers these services, which
typically involve both preprogram training and
ongoing technical assistance via consultation or
coaching strategies. Therefore, schools must commit
the necessary nancial resources and time to
increase the likelihood of effective implementation
that, in turn, will enhance the probability of pro-
gram success. Unfortunately, some schools do not
6 Domitrovich, Durlak, Staley, and Weissberg
have the necessary resources available to conduct,
adopt, and sustain evidence-based programs.
There is a growing eld of scientic study
devoted to better understanding the implementa-
tion process in order to support dissemination. Sev-
eral sources discuss the multiple factors that can
serve to either impede or enhance the chances of
achieving high-quality implementation when pro-
grams are conducted in new settings (Domitrovich
et al., 2008; Durlak, 2016; Fixsen, Naoom, Blas
Friedman, & Wallace, 2005). This research is being
incorporated into technical assistance systems that
are used in community settings (Mihalic, Irwin,
Fagan, Ballard, & Elliott, 2004; Wandersman et al.,
2008). There are also organizations working to sup-
port districts that are interested in introducing and
integrating a focus on SEL throughout the educa-
tional system (Collaborative for Academic, Social,
and Emotional Learning, 2016). An independent
evaluation of a large-scale demonstration project
with eight large urban school districts suggests that
this work is feasible, and preliminary results sug-
gest that higher levels of implementation are associ-
ated with improvements in student outcomes
(Kendziora & Osher, 2016).
Given the amount of time that children spend in
schools, this setting is an important location for pre-
vention efforts designed to promote the wellness of
at-risk students. In this article, we argue that uni-
versal interventions that promote studentssocial
and emotional competence should be implemented
in preK-12 as part of a public health strategy. There
are a number of evidence-based SEL programs that
could be used immediately and are identied in
registries, but additional research is needed to dis-
cern the active ingredients of these interventions so
that they can be streamlined and tailored to the
needs of different schools and communities. Addi-
tional research is also needed to determine how
individual and contextual factors interact in school
settings to facilitate or impede the behavior change
process for different groups of students. Finally, it
is imperative that policymakers support state and
federal policies that promote universal SEL pro-
grams as part of standard educational practice so
that schools have the resources they need to be able
to adopt and sustain these interventions (Dusen-
bury, Newman, et al., 2015; Zaslow, Mackintosh,
Mancoll, & Mandell, 2015). Doing so will be a good
economic investment (Beleld et al., 2015) as well
as a sound investment in the future by producing
young people who are knowledgeable, responsible,
caring, and contributing citizens.
Arsenio, W. F., Adams, E., & Gold, J. (2009). Social infor-
mation processing, moral reasoning, and emotion attri-
butions: Relations with adolescentsreactive and
proactive aggression. Child Development,80, 17391755.
Barnes, T. N., Smith, S. W., & Miller, M. D. (2014).
School-based cognitive-behavioral interventions in the
treatment of aggression in the United States: A meta-
analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior,19, 311321.
Beauchamp, M. H., & Anderson, V. (2010). SOCIAL: An
integrative framework for the development of social
skills. Psychological Bulletin,136,3964. doi:10.1037/
Beleld, C., Bowden, B., Klapp, A., Levin, H., Shand, R.,
& Zander, S. (2015). The economic value of social and emo-
tional learning. New York, NY: Center for Benet-Cost
Studies in Education
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learn-
ing. (2013). 2013 CASEL guide: Effective social and emo-
tional learning programs: Preschool and elementary school
edition. Chicago, IL: Author.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learn-
ing. (2015). 2015 CASEL guide: Effective social and emo-
tional learning programs: Secondary school edition.
Chicago, IL: Author.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learn-
ing. (2016). District guide to systemic social and emotional
learning. Chicago, IL: Author.
Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., &
Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimiza-
tion in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic
investigation. School Psychology Quarterly,25,6583.
Dodge, K. A., Lansford, J. E., & Dishion, T. J. (2006).
The problem of deviant peer inuences in intervention
programs. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lans-
ford (Eds.), Deviant peer inuences in programs for
youth: Problems and solutions (pp. 313). New York,
NY: Guilford.
Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Poduska, J. M.,
Hoagwood, K., Buckley, J. A., Olin, S., . . . Ialongo, N.
S. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of
evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A
conceptual framework. Advances in School Based Mental
Health Promotion,1,628. doi:10.1080/1754730x.2008.
Durlak, J. A. (2016). What everyone should know about
program implementation. In J. A. Durlak, C. E.
Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.),
Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and
practice (pp. 395405). New York, NY: Guilford.
Process of Social and Emotional Learning 7
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor,
R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of
enhancing studentssocial and emotional learning: A
meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions.
Child Development,82, 405432. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.
Dusenbury, L., Calin, S., Domitrovich, C. E., & Weissberg,
R. P. (2015). What does evidence-based instruction in social
and emotional learning actually look like in practice? Chi-
cago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emo-
tional Learning.
Dusenbury, L. A., Newman, J. Z., Weissberg, R. P.,
Goren, P., Domitrovich, C. E., & Mart, A. K. (2015).
The case for preschool through high school state learn-
ing standards for SEL. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitro-
vich, R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook
of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp.
532548). New York, NY: Guilford.
Dymnicki, A. B., Weissberg, R. P., & Henry, D. B. (2011).
Understanding how programs work to prevent overt
aggressive behaviors: A meta-analysis of mediators of
elementary schoolbased programs. Journal of School
Violence,10, 315337. doi:10.1080/15388220.2011.602599
Elias, M. J., & Haynes, N. M. (2008). Social competence,
social support, and academic achievement in minority,
low-income, urban elementary school children. School
Psychology Quarterly,23, 474495. doi:10.1037/1045-
Epstein, J. A., Grifn, K. W., & Botvin, G. J. (2000). Com-
petence skills help deter smoking among inner city
adolescents. Tobacco Control,9,3339. doi:10.1136/tc.9.
Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E.,
Nagoaka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Nicole, O.
(2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of
non-cognitive factors in shaping school performance: A criti-
cal literature review. University of Chicago Consortium
on Chicago School Research. Retrieved from http://ccsr.
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blas
e, K. A., Friedman, R. M.,
& Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis
of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida,
Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The
National Implementation Research Network (FMHI
Publication #231).
Flay, B. R. (2000). Approaches to substance use preven-
tion utilizing school curriculum plus social environ-
ment change. Addictive Behaviors,26, 861885. doi:doi.
org/10.1016/S0306-4603(00), 00130-1
Garrard, W. M., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). Conict resolu-
tion education and antisocial behavior in U.S. schools:
A meta-analysis. Conict Resolution Quarterly,25,938.
Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Weissberg, R. P., &
Durlak, J. A. (in press). Social and emotional learning
and education: Adopting a public health approach. The
Future of Children.
Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., OBrien, M. U., Zins,
J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003).
Enhancing school-based prevention and youth develop-
ment through coordinated social, emotional, and aca-
demic learning. American Psychologist,58, 466474.
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects
of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market
outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Econom-
ics, 2006, 24, 411482.
January, A. M., Casey, R. J., & Paulson, D. (2011). A
meta-analysis of classroom-wide interventions to build
social skills: Do they work? School Psychology Review,
40, 242256.
Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M., & Crowley, M. (2015). Early
social-emotional functioning and public health: The
relationship between kindergarten social competence
and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health,
105, 22832290. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302630
Kendziora, K., & Osher, D. (2016). Promoting childrens
and adolescentssocial and emotional development:
District adaptations of a theory of action. Journal of
Clinical and Adolescent Psychology,45, 797811. doi:10.
Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., &
Doolaard, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of
classroom management strategies and classroom man-
agement programs on studentsacademic, behavioral,
emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educa-
tional Research,86, 643680. doi:10:3102/003465
Kuperminc, G. P., Leadbeater, B. J., & Blatt, S. J. (2001).
School social climate and individual differences in vul-
nerability to psychopathology among middle school
students. Journal of School Psychology,39, 141159.
Luthar, S. S., & Barkin, S. H. (2012). Are afuent youth
truly at risk? Vulnerability and resilience across three
diverse samples. Development and Psychopathology,24,
429449. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000089
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The con-
struct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines
for future work. Child Development,71, 543562. doi:10.
Mihalic, S., Irwin, K., Fagan, A., Ballard, D., & Elliott, D.
(2004). Successful program implementation: Lessons from
Blueprints. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice,
Ofce of Justice Programs. Retrieved from www.ojp.
Moftt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N.,
Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., . . . Caspi, A. (2011). A
gradient of childhood self-control predicts health,
wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,108,
Multisite Violence Prevention Project. (2009). The ecologi-
cal effects of universal and selective violence prevention
programs for middle school students: A randomized
8 Domitrovich, Durlak, Staley, and Weissberg
trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,77,
526542. doi:10.1037/a0014395
Ngwe, J. E., Liu, L. C., Flay, B. R., & Segawa, E.; the
Aban Aya Co-Investigators. (2004). Violence prevention
among African American adolescent males. American
Journal of Health Behavior,28(Suppl. 1), s24s37.
OConnell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (Eds.). (2009).
Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders
among young people: Progress and possibilities. National
Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Washing-
ton, DC: National Academies Press.
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and
work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st
century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., Ritter, M. D., Ben, J., & Gra-
vesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school based univer-
sal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they
enhance studentsdevelopment in the area of skill,
behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools,49,
892909. doi:10.1002/pits.21641
Taylor, R., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (in
press). Promoting positive youth development through
school-based social and emotional learning interventions:
A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development.
Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-DAlessandro,
A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review
of Educational Research,83, 357385. doi:10.3102/
Tobler, N. S., Roona, M. R., Ochshorn, P., Marshall, D.
G., Streke, A. V., & Stackpole, A. M. (2000). School-
based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998
meta-analysis. The Journal of Primary Prevention,20,
275336. doi:10.1023/A:1021314704811
Trentacosta, C. J., & Fine, S. E. (2010). Emotion knowl-
edge, social competence, and behavior problems in
childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review.
Social Development,19,129. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.
Valiente, C., Eisenberg, N., Haugen, R., Spinrad, T. L.,
Hofer, C., Liew, J., & Kupfer, A. (2011). Childrens
effortful control and academic achievement: Mediation
through social functioning. Early Education and Develop-
ment,22, 411433. doi:10.1080/10409289.2010.505259
Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R.,
Lubell, K., Stillman, L., . . . Saul, J. (2008). Bridging the
gap between prevention research and practice: The
interactive systems framework for dissemination and
implementation. American Journal of Community Psychol-
ogy,41, 171181. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9174-z
Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Domitrovich, C. E., & Gul-
lotta, T. P. (2015). Social and emotional learning: Past,
present, and future. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich,
R. P. Weissberg, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of
social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 3
19). New York, NY: Guilford.
Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based inter-
ventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior:
Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preven-
tive Medicine,33, S130S143. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.
Zaslow, M., Mackintosh, B., Mancoll, S., & Mandell, S.
(2015). Federal policy initiatives and childrens SEL. In
J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg, & T.
P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learn-
ing: Research and practice (pp. 549565). New York, NY:
Process of Social and Emotional Learning 9
... A meta-analysis conducted by Durlak et al. (2011) evaluating 213 SEL programs found that participation was associated with increased social-emotional competence and academic skills, providing empirical support for adopting these practices within schools. Also, by the age of 3, children start spending more time in structured educational settings, in which teaching about SEL skills can be easily embedded within daily interactions in order to create an emotionally safe classroom climate, improve learning, as well as the quality of peer and teacher-child interactions (Domitrovich et al., 2017;Mahoney et al., 2020). ...
... The total sample size was N = 5330. Based on the geographic location, only three effectiveness studies (42.9%) were conducted in the USA(Domitrovich et al., 2017;Fishbein et al., 2016;Hughes & Cline, 2015). PATHS was delivered in four studies (57.1%) as a universal intervention(Arda & Ocak, 2012;Eninger et al., 2021;Hughes & Cline., 2015;Bilir Seyhan et al. ...
Full-text available
Social–emotional skills are essential for preschool children’s mental health and later school success. Considering the variety of school-based interventions aiming to target SEL development, it remains unclear what programs can be considered evidence-based, and what features characterize well-established programs. Hence, the current systematic review aimed (1) to classify classroom-wide SEL programs according to the criteria for evidence-based interventions; (2) to synthesize studies of programs categorized as well-established; and (3) to analyze study-level and overall risk of bias. Interventions were assessed for inclusion, and corresponding studies were systematically searched. A total of 81 studies corresponding to 38 programs were identified, and 24 studies corresponding to four programs classified as well-established were further analyzed. The results indicated that (1) a limited number of classroom-wide interventions (10.5%) meet the criteria for well-established interventions; (2) program implementation is associated with significant improvement in social–emotional competence, reduced risk of emotional, and behavioral problems, as well as with emerging evidence of positive effects on executive functions or school readiness; and (3) outcomes are reported in the context of mainly rigorously conducted experimental research, which could explain the low risk bias ratings for random assignment, baseline equivalence, or attrition. Taken together, these findings suggest that well-established classroom-based interventions could be promoted as examples of best practices which can be systematically implemented within schools. However, more research is needed to identify key ingredients of program effectiveness, as well as to understand the contextual school-related factors, which enable successful transfer from research to large-scale implementation of classroom-wide SEL practices.
... Restrictions on quarantine caused children many problems related to their social well-being and psychological health, and especially their emotional well-being and experiences worldwide [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In this context, the children's capacity to cope with current challenges is critical, as it will aid in avoiding major implications for the children's personality and development. General education school students with higher socio-emotional intelligence are much more effective and successful in dealing with the problems they face, experiencing significantly fewer internal, external, and general emotional and behavioral difficulties [14][15][16][17]. Socio-emotional competence is one of the most central variables affecting a child's effective functioning; hence, it must be regularly analyzed and enhanced through the most effective educational approaches. ...
... The measure of The Limbic Performance Indicators [43] is based on the theory that social competence and emotional competence are two distinct constructs but strongly connected with overlapping developmental and behavioral processes. The scale is comprised of 17 dimensions: (1) an ability to meet basic emotional needs (such as need for the security, autonomy and control, privacy and reflection, etc.), (2) ability to live according to personal values, (3) self-esteem (ability to unconditionally accept and evaluate one's personality), (4) respect for others (ability to unconditionally accept and value the personalities of others), (5) emotional self-perception (ability to analyse and perceive one's feelings and emotions), (6) emotional perception of others (ability to analyse and perceive the feelings and emotions of others), (7) ability to manage stress, (8) positivity (ability to remain both optimistic and realistic), (9) balance (ability to allocate resources for the different areas of life), (10) ability to manage change, (11) authenticity (ability to remain yourself in different social situations), (12) active reflection (ability to learn from own experiences), (13) trust (ability to keep the trust in others), (14) ability to manage conflicts, (15) openness (ability to express one's thoughts and feelings in an open manner), (16) ability to collaborate with others, and (17) support (ability to provide others with help and support). This scale is designed to be sensitive to changes over time and intends to assist school practitioners and evaluators in assessing the level of social-emotional competence and subsequently identify those areas deemed in need of improvement. ...
Full-text available
Socio-emotional education is referred to as the missing part that links academic knowledge to successes in school, family, community, workplace, and life. Socio-emotional education, in conjunction with academic instruction, aims to lay the groundwork for a sound moral education. This manuscript is aimed at proving that socio-emotional education may improve children’s mental health. In total, 1322 students (of grades K5–K12) participated in this study back in October 2020. A statistically validated and partially modified questionnaire according to The Limbic Performance Indicators™ (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92, p < 0.000) was used to assess general education school students’ social–emotional competencies. The study uses an abbreviated version of the questionnaire adapted by the Lithuanian Association of Social Emotional Education, which has been adapted with the consent of the selected age group. As a result, this study explores how to determine general education school students’ knowledge and skills in socio-emotional education while also identifying the best pedagogical approaches to addressing socio-emotional education. According to research findings, students that participated in the study displayed more personal values, respect for others, internal balance, collaboration, emotional perception of others, or basic emotional needs. Personal values, respect for others, emotional perception of others, internal balance, support, and basic emotional needs were estimated to be greater in the target group of girls than in the target group of boys.
... Improvements in these specific domains are important in terms of the social, behavioural, and academic outcomes. Moreover, they could predict important life outcomes in adulthood and play a critical role in the behaviour change process [62]. Group intervention could be crucial to designing the role of schools in ensuring pupil emotional health and well-being, allowing children to develop their cooperative skills and achieve greater success both in school and in the future. ...
Full-text available
Emotional competence (EC) is a key component of children's psychological, cognitive, and social development, and it is a central element of learning. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing a psycho-educational group intervention aimed at improving children's emotional competence (EC), quality of integration and scholastic skills. A total of 229 children (123 females; M Age = 7.22 years; SD = 0.97 years) completed the Pictures of Facial Affect (POFA), the Drawn Stories Technique, the Classroom Drawing, and the Colored Progressive Matrices. The total sample was randomly divided into an intervention group (N = 116) who took part in psycho-educational activities and a control (no-intervention) group (N = 84). Both groups were tested at baseline, before the intervention started, and at the end of the intervention (4 months from baseline). Results from mixed-model ANOVA revealed a significant main effect for POFA score over time (F = 6.24, p = 0.01) and an interaction effect between POFA and group (F = 4.82, p = 0.03). No significant main effect was found for classroom drawing over time (F = 0.81, p > 0.05) or for quality of integration and group intervention. These findings support the importance of developing psycho-educational programmes in school for promotion of emotional health for preventing not only the onset of problematic behaviours at school such as bullying but also the development of clinical conditions linked to difficulties in emotional recognition, expression, and regulation such as alexithymia.
... como factor protector, que favorece la adaptación al contexto, el afrontamiento al estrés y a cualquier circunstancia en el ámbito educativo o laboral de las personas (Mikulic et al., 2015). Así, las competencias socioemocionales docentes son fundamentales, pues estas favorecen el clima de aula y pueden mejorar los resultados académicos, sociales y emocionales de los estudiantes (Arens & Morin, 2016;Domitrovich et al., 2017;Jennings et al., 2017). ...
Full-text available
Resumen: Las competencias socioemocionales docentes impactan positivamente la relación docente-estudiante, así como en la gestión y clima de aula; a su vez, influyen en los resultados académicos y competencias socioemocionales de los estudiantes. Este estudio tuvo por objetivo caracterizar elementos teóricos y metodológicos de investigaciones empíricas sobre competencias socioemocionales de docentes de primaria y secundaria. El método fue una revisión sistemática de la literatura de las bases de datos Web of Science, Scopus y ERIC de los últimos 10 años. La muestra fue de 15 investigaciones que cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Los resultados mostraron que las investigaciones principalmente se han desarrollado en Europa, con muestras de hasta 200 participantes, con enfoque cuantitativo, así como la utilización de 21 instrumentos distintos para medir competencias socioemocionales en los docentes. Además, se identificaron 3 teorías, 5 modelos teóricos y 4 conceptualizaciones diferentes para referirse a competencias socioemocionales. En conclusión, existen diferentes posturas teóricas, conceptualizaciones y formas de medición de las competencias socioemocionales de los docentes. Se requiere avanzar en la realización de investigaciones empíricas basadas en el consenso de un modelo teórico que represente los aspectos comunes de las teorías.
... In the future, research in the areas of relaxation therapy, cognitive behavioural therapy, various training programmes, mindfulness meditation, yoga, psychotherapy, and emotional literacy as a course in the curriculum may be conducted. As a result, effective management measures for controlling aggressive behaviour should be developed [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. ...
Full-text available
Purpose: To conduct a systematic review study of school based interventions to decrease aggressive behaviour among adolescents. The main goal of this review is to know about various interventions and to evaluate the effect of interventions on aggressive behaviour. The study's second goal is to find research gaps that could lead to more research in this area. The findings could be used as a foundation for developing interventional programs aimed at reducing adolescents' aggression. Design/Methodology/Approach: The purpose of this study is to develop a module as coping techniques to reduce the aggressive behaviour and analyse the ABCD model of the same. For this purpose we conducted a search 122 articles for relevant articles in the specified area. We looked for articles published between 2000 and 2022 using the primary databases; Google Scholar, Research Gate, Academia, SSRN, Shodhganga, PubMed, Rayyan and Elsevier. The words like aggressive behaviour, interventions and aggression were used for searching articles. All abstracts and entire articles were scrutinized to see various interventions as a coping strategy to decrease aggressions among students. Findings/Result: These findings reveal a clear link between self-control abilities and aggressive behaviour: those with greater self-control have less aggression, while people with lower self-control have more aggression. This relationship shows to hold true across a range of ages i.e. from childhood onwards. Based on these review study it also discussed and put forward future research into various interventions and strategies for regulating aggressiveness. Originality/Value: This review summarizes selected studies identifying the effect of various interventions on aggressive behaviour and find out the coping strategies. The future direction of existing research on emotional stability, first focusing on stressors and barriers associated with aggressive behavior, and considering the increased risk of stress, anxiety, and depression reported in this population. Next, it then describes recent trends and issues and seeks to fill gaps in existing literature that require additional research effort. We also conclude that there exists a need for future research on psychological intervention and coping strategies, cognitive behavioral therapy, parent management training, anger rumination and relaxation therapy for enhancing emotional well being and self-control of adolescents. Implementing parental interventions in parallel with the child's interventions may raise mental health.
... Studies of shared reading in the homes and classrooms of preschool children indicate that discussions of emotions and feelings facilitate children's socio-emotional competence (Schapira and Aram, 2020), ability to generate solutions to social problems (Bergman Deitcher et al., 2021), and development of theory of mind (Martucci, 2016). Because socio-emotional competence is a predictor of both academic achievement and social outcomes (Domitrovich et al., 2017;Trentacosta and Izard, 2007), librarians should continue the practice of discussing emotions within the context of storytime. While it is likely easier for librarians to focus these conversations on identifying the emotions characters are expressing (Garner and Parker, 2018), it is probably more beneficial for children if librarians direct the discussion toward deciphering the causes of characters' emotions (Martucci, 2016). ...
Shared book reading in which children actively participate in the reading of a text via discussion or extratextual talk has been well-established as an activity to advance children’s literacy and language learning, and it is a characteristic practice of public library storytime programs. This study scrutinized the extratextual talk that occurred within the shared reading episodes of 15 public library storytime programs. Findings from this study confirm prior assertions that storytime programs hold the promise of advancing children’s early literacy development. With more than two-fifths of librarians’ extratextual utterances at an abstract level of understanding, storytimes serve as a favorable setting for advancing children’s inferencing skills and symbolic understanding. Results also point to areas that librarians might target for improvement including integration of questions requiring extended responses and attention to vocabulary.
Investigations on the bidirectional relationships between parenting stress and child behavior problems are important to inform intervention strategies; however, prior research has provided inconsistent findings. Using a national sample of multi‐stressed single‐mother families from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing study, the present study examined the bidirectional relationships between maternal parenting stress and children's behavioral problems spanning from early childhood through adolescence at the child's ages 3, 5, 9, and 15. Reciprocal transactions were found between parenting stress and behavior problems in early childhood between the ages 3 and 5. From age 5 to age 15, our findings also suggest that children's behavior problems at an earlier time point predict mothers' parenting stress at a later time point. Unexpectedly, the lagged effects of parenting stress on child behavior problems in school ages were not significant in our sampled data. Early childhood interventions should address mitigating both parenting stress and their toddlers' behavior problems. During middle childhood and adolescence, interventions to directly address children's behavior problems are critical both to the well‐being of mothers and to assist in the reduction in levels of behavior problems. 对养育子女的压力和儿童行为问题之间的双向关系的调查,对提供干预策略很重要;然而,以前的研究提供了不一致的结果。本研究使用来自脆弱家庭和儿童健康研究的多压力单亲母亲家庭的全国性样本,研究了母亲养育压力和儿童行为问题之间的双向关系,时间跨度从儿童早期到青少年期的3、5、9和15岁。在3至5岁的儿童早期,父母的压力和行为问题之间存在相互影响。从5岁到15岁,我们的发现还表明,儿童在早期的行为问题可以预测母亲在后期的养育压力。意外的是,在我们的抽样数据中,养育压力对学龄儿童行为问题的滞后影响并不显著。儿童早期的干预措施应该同时解决减轻父母的压力和幼儿的行为问题。在儿童中期和青少年时期,直接解决儿童行为问题的干预措施对母亲的幸福和协助降低行为问题的水平都是至关重要的。
This chapter explores how school counselors are servant leaders through the MTMDSS Framework in K-12 and how they practice servant leadership skills pre- and post-pandemic. School counselors are servant leaders in their school communities. They lead with their hearts to serve students through their academics, social-emotional needs, and post-high school plans. They collaborate with staff to ensure students get the personal support needed. In addition, they develop school culture with faculty and administrators. As school counselors return to campus, they face challenges since they have large caseloads and new responsibilities, but their ability to multitask, connect with others, and provide help when needed will help guide their work. School counselors demonstrate servant leadership values in their work. As school counselors, their goal is always the greater good. School counselors are student-centered and strive to help their students be the best possible version of themselves.
Full-text available
Evidence-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs, when implemented effectively, lead to measurable and potentially long-lasting improvements in many areas of children’s lives. In the short term, SEL programs can enhance children’s confidence in themselves; increase their engagement in school, along with their test scores and grades; and reduce conduct problems while promoting desirable behaviors. In the long term, children with greater social-emotional competence are more likely to be ready for college, succeed in their careers, have positive relationships and better mental health, and become engaged citizens. Those benefits make SEL programs an ideal foundation for a public health approach to education-that is, an approach that seeks to improve the general population’s wellbeing. In this article, Mark Greenberg, Celene Domitrovich, Roger Weissberg, and Joseph Durlak argue that SEL can support a public health approach to education for three reasons. First, schools are ideal sites for interventions with children. Second, school-based SEL programs can improve students’ competence, enhance their academic achievement, and make them less likely to experience future behavioral and emotional problems. Third, evidence-based SEL interventions in all schools-that is, universal interventions-could substantially affect public health. The authors begin by defining social and emotional learning and summarizing research that shows why SEL is important for positive outcomes, both while students are in school and as they grow into adults. Then they describe what a public health approach to education would involve. In doing so, they present the prevention paradox- “a large number of people exposed to a small risk may generate many more cases [of an undesirable outcome] than a small number exposed to a high risk”-to explain why universal approaches that target an entire population are essential. Finally, they outline an effective, school-based public health approach to SEL that would maximize positive outcomes for our nation’s children.
Full-text available
This meta-analysis reviewed 82 school-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions involving 97,406 kindergarten to high school students (Mage = 11.09 years; mean percent low socioeconomic status = 41.1; mean percent students of color = 45.9). Thirty-eight interventions took place outside the United States. Follow-up outcomes (collected 6 months to 18 years postintervention) demonstrate SEL's enhancement of positive youth development. Participants fared significantly better than controls in social-emotional skills, attitudes, and indicators of well-being. Benefits were similar regardless of students’ race, socioeconomic background, or school location. Postintervention social-emotional skill development was the strongest predictor of well-being at follow-up. Infrequently assessed but notable outcomes (e.g., graduation and safe sexual behaviors) illustrate SEL's improvement of critical aspects of students’ developmental trajectories.
Full-text available
There is a growing body of research emphasizing the advantages of teaching students social and emotional (SE) skills in school. Here we examine the economic value of these skills within a benefit-cost analysis (BCA) framework. Our examination has three parts. First, we describe how the current method of BCA must be expanded to adequately evaluate SE skills, and we identify important decisions analysts must make. Second, we review the evidence on the benefits of SE skills, again noting key methodological issues with respect to shadow pricing. Finally, we perform BCA of four selected social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions: 4Rs; Second Step, Life Skills Training; and Responsive Classroom. These analyses illustrate both methodological and empirical challenges in estimating net present values for these interventions. Even with these challenges, we find that the benefits of these interventions substantially outweigh the costs. We highlight promising areas of research for improving the application of BCA to SEL.
Full-text available
This meta-analysis examined which classroom management strategies and programs enhanced students’ academic, behavioral, social-emotional, and motivational outcomes in primary education. The analysis included 54 random and nonrandom controlled intervention studies published in the past decade (2003–2013). Results showed small but significant effects (average g = 0.22) on all outcomes, except for motivational outcomes. Programs were coded for the presence/absence of four categories of strategies: focusing on the teacher, on student behavior, on students’ social-emotional development, and on teacher–student relationships. Focusing on the students’ social-emotional development appeared to have the largest contribution to the interventions’ effectiveness, in particular on the social-emotional outcomes. Moreover, we found a tentative result that students’ academic outcomes benefitted from teacher-focused programs.
Mental health and substance use disorders among children, youth, and young adults are major threats to the health and well-being of younger populations which often carryover into adulthood. The costs of treatment for mental health and addictive disorders, which create an enormous burden on the affected individuals, their families, and society, have stimulated increasing interest in prevention practices that can impede the onset or reduce the severity of the disorders. Prevention practices have emerged in a variety of settings, including programs for selected at-risk populations (such as children and youth in the child welfare system), school-based interventions, interventions in primary care settings, and community services designed to address a broad array of mental health needs and populations. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People updates a 1994 Institute of Medicine book, Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders, focusing special attention on the research base and program experience with younger populations that have emerged since that time. Researchers, such as those involved in prevention science, mental health, education, substance abuse, juvenile justice, health, child and youth development, as well as policy makers involved in state and local mental health, substance abuse, welfare, education, and justice will depend on this updated information on the status of research and suggested directions for the field of mental health and prevention of disorders. © 2009 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Americans have long recognized that investments in public education contribute to the common good, enhancing national prosperity and supporting stable families, neighborhoods, and communities. Education is even more critical today, in the face of economic, environmental, and social challenges. Today's children can meet future challenges if their schooling and informal learning activities prepare them for adult roles as citizens, employees, managers, parents, volunteers, and entrepreneurs. To achieve their full potential as adults, young people need to develop a range of skills and knowledge that facilitate mastery and application of English, mathematics, and other school subjects. At the same time, business and political leaders are increasingly asking schools to develop skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and self-management - often referred to as "21st century skills." Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century describes this important set of key skills that increase deeper learning, college and career readiness, student-centered learning, and higher order thinking. These labels include both cognitive and non-cognitive skills- such as critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, effective communication, motivation, persistence, and learning to learn. 21st century skills also include creativity, innovation, and ethics that are important to later success and may be developed in formal or informal learning environments. This report also describes how these skills relate to each other and to more traditional academic skills and content in the key disciplines of reading, mathematics, and science. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century summarizes the findings of the research that investigates the importance of such skills to success in education, work, and other areas of adult responsibility and that demonstrates the importance of developing these skills in K-16 education. In this report, features related to learning these skills are identified, which include teacher professional development, curriculum, assessment, after-school and out-of-school programs, and informal learning centers such as exhibits and museums. © 2012 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
This article contributes to the broader discussion of promotion, prevention, and intervention in child and adolescent mental health by describing implementation and early outcomes of an 8-school district demonstration project aimed at making the promotion of social and emotional learning a systemic part of school districts' practice. Eight districts are 2-3 years in to their participation in the 6-year project. The districts are large, are predominantly urban, and serve many students who are at disadvantage. The evaluation involved collection of qualitative data to measure the degree to which the districts realized the goals established in the initiative's theory of action, as well as school climate data, extant student records, and surveys of students' social and emotional competence. To date, results show that districts have followed highly individual pathways toward integrating social and emotional learning systemically, and all have made progress over time. Although school-level implementation remains at moderate levels, 2 districts in which we could examine school climate showed gains from preinitiative years. Four of 6 measured districts showed improvement in social and emotional competence for students in Grade 3, and achievement and discipline showed overall improvements across all districts. Overall findings show that implementation of the initiative's theory of action by school districts is feasible, even in times of budgetary stress and leadership turnover. This establishes the potential for school districts to serve as a lever of change in the promotion of students' social and emotional development and mental wellness.
This article establishes that a low-dimensional vector of cognitive and noncognitive skills explains a variety of labor market and behavioral outcomes. Our analysis addresses the problems of measurement error, imperfect proxies, and reverse causality that plague conventional studies. Noncognitive skills strongly influence schooling decisions and also affect wages, given schooling decisions. Schooling, employment, work experience, and choice of occupation are affected by latent noncognitive and cognitive skills. We show that the same low-dimensional vector of abilities that explains schooling choices, wages, employment, work experience, and choice of occupation explains a wide variety of risky behaviors.