Estimating and optimizing the psychological conditions of workers for their respective occupations improves performance. For this purpose, we can use psychological variables (e.g., concentration levels) proposed by basic and applied psychological studies. For example, we can keep workers’ concentration levels high by taking advantage of general phenomena reported in basic studies (e.g., taking breaks to compensate for decreases in concentration over time in any task) or specific phenomena in applied studies (e.g., presenting warning signals at points that are temporally or spatially hazardous in particular tasks).
These ‘basic’ and ‘applied’ psychological variables, proposed by corresponding study principles, have conflicting objectives and generality. Basic psychological variables can be used to understand general psychological mechanisms that operate in any situation and, although limited in effect, sometimes improve specific occupational performance. In contrast, applied psychological variables can be used to improve specific occupational performance in specific occupational situations without considering the general psychological mechanisms underlying most situations.
However, both a basic understanding of the general mechanisms underlying variables and their specific effectiveness in applications are critical for occupational performance improvements. Through basic features/benefits, we can aggregate and utilize knowledge about workers’ general tendencies, as identified in many controlled experimental tasks (i.e., general situations). In contrast, through applied features/benefits, we can directly describe and utilize workers’ tendencies in particular occupational tasks (i.e., specific situations). Nevertheless, few approaches have ever evaluated both aspects simultaneously.
Therefore, Part I of this dissertation examines whether proposing psychological variables with both basic and applied features/benefits is possible. For this purpose, I conducted experiments that used controlled (i.e., general), and yet occupational (i.e., specific) situations (i.e., moderately occupational situations) to propose occupationally specific psychological variables with the underlying general mechanisms. In Part II, I discuss general frameworks that make this possible. I think approaching psychological variables in line with state and trait properties might be effective in proposing psychological variables with basic and applied features/benefits (i.e., intermediate occupational psychological constructs; intermediate OPCs). Accordingly, I propose a state-trait framework that suggests study designs for eliciting these intermediate OPCs. In Chapter 1, I discuss the issues regarding the gap between the basic and applied psychological variables, the need for bridging this gap, and the overview of this dissertation.
In Part I, empirical studies added applied features/benefits to basic variable examples or basic features/benefits to applied variable examples. Specifically, I estimated psychological variables using biological indicators in moderately occupational situations. This estimation may show the underlying biological systems associated with the indicators, or the general mechanisms, and the psychological variables to be optimized with these indicators in specific occupational situations, or specific effectiveness. I selected the estimation targets, or the psychological variable examples, according to the classification of the states and traits related to generality. While state-like variables are changeable within any individual by an external factor, trait-like variables are internally stable within individuals but differ between individuals.
For state-like variable examples, in Chapters 2-3, I estimated the participants’ second-to-second performances in the simplified version of operations monitoring tasks using the pupillary fluctuation amplitude (i.e., estimating short-term vigilance levels). Traditional concepts of medium-term vigilance mainly suggest general mechanisms underlying performance decrements over several hours without any disturbance (i.e., basic), but they do not involve occupationally specific real-time performance fluctuations (i.e., applied). Therefore, Chapter 2 expanded the method of estimating vigilance levels from medium-term (i.e., basic) to short-term (i.e., applied). Subsequently, the general mechanisms underlying short-term vigilance levels needed to be clarified. Chapter 3 revealed that the proposed method captures how the states of temporal attention mechanisms (i.e., basic) modulate short-term vigilance levels (i.e., applied), presenting the concept of temporal attention.
For trait-like variable examples, in Chapter 4, I estimated the participants’ gaze behaviors in the experiments that reproduced realistic working tasks using the biological Big Five (i.e., estimating real-world visual attention tendencies). Traditional concepts of visual attention tendencies mainly suggest general attentional mechanisms in laboratory-controlled situations (i.e., basic), but they do not involve occupationally specific gaze behaviors in realistic working tasks (i.e., applied). Therefore, Chapter 4 expanded the method of estimating (explaining) visual attention tendencies from laboratory-controlled situational (i.e., basic) to realistic situational (i.e., applied). The results suggest that the proposed method captures how the openness traits of visual attention mechanisms (i.e., basic) modulate real-world visual attention tendencies (i.e., applied), encompassing the concept of openness modulation.
For trait-like variable examples, in Chapter 5, I also estimated the participants’ preferences for various occupational titles using the biological Big Five (i.e., estimating data-driven occupational preferences). Traditional concepts of theory-driven occupational preferences mainly do not suggest general personality mechanisms underlying these preferences. Therefore, Chapter 5 expanded the occupational preferences from theory-driven (i.e., applied) to data-driven (i.e., basic), which the Big Five traits might systematically estimate (explain). The results suggest that the proposed estimation (explanation) captures how Openness, Extraversion, and Agreeableness traits of personality mechanisms (i.e., basic) modulate data-driven occupational preferences (i.e., applied), describing the concept of occupational personality traits. Finally, Chapter 6 summarizes and discusses the current empirical studies.
In Part II, theoretical discussion, Chapter 7 proposed the state-trait framework for deriving OPCs that bridge the gap between basic and applied features/benefits. I point out that possessing general mechanisms, that is, individual- and situation-independent processes or individual-dependent and situation-independent structures, makes OPCs have basic features/benefits. Additionally, I point out that possessing specific effectiveness, or occupational situation-dependent psychobehavioral variations, makes OPCs have applied features/benefits. The OPCs connecting both features/benefits, namely intermediate OPCs, show how the individual- and situation-independent processes or situation-independent structures generate psychobehavioral variations depending on individuals or specific occupational situations or both. I suggest that the cross-disciplinary, that is, applicable to basic and applied disciplines, folk psychology, or state and trait psychologies, could function as such generation laws, leading to the bridges between the processes, structures, and psychobehavioral variations. Indeed, the proposed concepts of temporal attention (i.e., state), openness modulation (i.e., trait), and occupational personality traits (i.e., trait) may be examples of state and trait bridges in the intermediate OPCs. If approaching OPCs in line with the state and trait properties is effective for proposing intermediate OPCs with basic and applied features/benefits, we may be able to propose the state-trait framework that guides empirical studies for proposing intermediate OPCs generally. To conclude this dissertation, I hope the proposed framework will integrate basic and applied psychological studies in various fields.