The life of any organism is completely dependent on energy. Energy resources procurement, consumption and allocation through biological processes are essential aspects to understand an organism’s ecology. Thus, the energetic dynamics between organisms and their environment have important adaptive implications for survival and reproduction, i.e., for fitness. Under this perspective it is possible to evaluate the consequences of some anatomical and physiological human characteristics, or the assessment of certain behaviors.
Humans allocate a relevant part of their daily energy budget to locomotion and burden transport activities. Thus, around these activities, humans develop a whole range of behaviors that can be evaluated within the Human Behavioral Ecology theoretical framework. The energy distributed to these activities is not available to other biological functions, thus it is expected that humans adopt strategies that ensure their energy balance. Among these strategies it is proposed that division of labors is essential, as well as the activation of physiological and behavioral changes that ensure both mobility and reproduction.
Thus, this Ph. D. dissertation, will evaluate, from an energetic point of view, distinct physiological states and locomotion physical activities in a sample of current adult females and males. For this purpose, the data from two experimental studies were used. Both experimental studies have been designed at Bioenergy and Motion Analysis Laboratory from National Research Center of Human Evolution (CENIEH). Anthropometry, body composition and energy expenditure data have been obtained from a total of 125 subjects.
The first objective of this study was fixed to evaluate if sexual division of load transport activities, common in recent hunter-gatherer societies, is influenced by energetic differences among sexes. The data from 21 females and 27 males were used to elaborate several indices to compare, among sexes, the increment in the cost of locomotion when several burdens are transported. The results demonstrate that both females and males, carrying the same relative loads, experience the same increment over the cost of their unloaded locomotion. Therefore, apart from obvious differences in body mass, there is no evidence of an energetic advantage favoring one sex over the other that would explain the differences in load-carriage activities observed among current foraging populations.
The second research objective was planned to evaluate if body mass affects in the same way the resting energy expenditure and the locomotion costs of pregnant and nonpregnant females. Data from 77 females (42 nonpregnant and 35 pregnant females during their last gestation trimester) were obtained. All the data and the linear regression models about the relationship between body mass and energy expenditure were compared considering the physiological state. The results show that pregnant females expend less energy, both resting and during locomotion, than nonpregnant females with a similar body mass. It is proposed that this difference is caused by pregnant females having lesser percentages of metabolically active body tissues (Fat Free Mass) and larger percentages of metabolically passive body tissues (Fat Mass).
Two main conclusions were established from the outcomes obtained. On the one hand, the division of labor, frequently reported in hunter-gatherer activities, could be explained as a behavioral adaptation that increases individual fitness and, finally, the fitness of the entire group. In this line, it is proposed that the females of these populations perform preferably certain activities, because they benefit the group while the women themselves would be improving their own survival opportunities. Meanwhile, other group members could be focused on carrying out other complementary activities that would enhance the collective foraging efficacy. Consequently, it may be possible that the ability to develop different types of cooperation (phenotypic plasticity), has a great adaptive value, and it would have been selected throughout human evolution.
On the other hand, apart from behavioral adaptations, gestation related physiological changes could cause that pregnancy may not be as energetically constraining as usually assumed, agreeing with other studies that have detected a great variability in human pregnancy costs. This evidence would provide another reason for successful human pregnancies in differing ecological conditions, even when physical activity conducts do not vary during gestation. Similarly, as other researchers have found, the evolutionary relevance of Fat Mass accretion for both human survival and reproduction is highlighted.
To finally conclude, the capability to cooperate organizing the foraging tasks, as well as the changes in body composition related to pregnancy that influence gestation energy requirements, would be essential traits to understanding human populations development from a comparative perspective.