Analyzes state policy in the single agricultural sector of sugar in light of major changes in socio-political and economic structures and in view of the particular relations between the state and civil society that have characterized Brazil after 1964. It is widely held that the state played the dominant role in the policy process, subordinating elites, excluding popular classes from the decision
... [Show full abstract] making arena, and incorporating international capital as a critical element in economic growth. An inspection of the case of sugar, however, casts doubt on attributing ultimate policy supremacy to the bureaucratic-authoritarian state. It is argued that despite the considerable authority of the public sector, transformations in agriculture cannot be viewed primarily as the result of state initiatives. Instead, state policy was both a response to and an influence on secular trends in the agricultural economy, and producer elites retained significant leverage over decision making.-from Author