Content uploaded by Siti Aishah Wahid
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Siti Aishah Wahid on Jun 22, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 5(1)35-44, 2015
© 2015, TextRoad Publication
ISSN 2090-4304
Journal of Basic and Applied
Scientific Research
www.textroad.com
Corresponding Author: Norlia Md Desa, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic of Sultan Mizan
Zainal Abidin, 23000 Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia, E-mail: liiya69@yahoo.com
Utilization of Plastic Bottle Waste in Sand Bricks
Siti Aishah Wahid, Sullyfaizura Mohd Rawi, Norlia Md Desa
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Polytechnic of Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin, 23000 Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia
Received: October 14, 2014
Accepted: December 16, 2014
ABSTRACT
Disposal of large quantity of plastic bottle has emerged as an important environmental challenge, and
its recycling is facing a big problem due to non-degradable nature. Due to plastic does not decompose
biologically, the amount of plastic waste in our surroundings is steadily increasing. The proposed sand
bricks which is made up by adding plastic bottle waste in crush form in sand bricks may help to reuse
the plastic bottle waste as one of the additives material of bricks, and to help the disposal problem of
plastic waste. The properties of sand bricks which contain varying percentages of plastic were tested
for compressive strength, water absorption and efflorescence. It shows that an appreciable
improvement in the performance of bricks can be achieved by introducing crush type of plastic waste
into sand bricks. In view of utilization of plastic waste material for developing sustainable construction
material, the present paper reviews plastic waste materials in different compositions of 0% to 15% that
were added to the raw material to develop plastic waste sand bricks. The compression strength of the
bricks is reviewed and recommendations are suggested as the outcome of the study. It was found that
the reduction in compressive strength, due to replacement of sand by waste plastic bottle, is minimal
and can be enhanced by addition of super plasticizer. The water absorption and efflorescence however
showed excellent performance.
KEYWORDS: Plastic Waste, Compressive Strength, Water Absorption, Efflorescence, Environmental
Issue.
INTRODUCTION
Plastic is a very common material that is now widely used by everybody in this world. Plastic has
many advantages as it is compact and light in weight. Common plastic items that are used are bags,
bottles, containers and food packages. The great problem with plastic is its disposal. Plastic is made of
polymer chemicals and they are not bio degradable. This means that plastic will not decompose when it
is buried. Though plastic is a very useful material that is flexible, robust and rigid they become waste
after their use and they pollute the atmosphere.
Recycling is processing used materials (waste) into new products to prevent waste of potentially
useful materials. The increase in the popularity of using environmental friendly, low cost and
lightweight construction materials in building industry has brought about the need to investigate how
this can be achieved by benefiting to the environment as well as maintaining the material requirements
affirmed in the standards. To protect the environment as well as to take advantage of plastic, recycling
procedure is used.
The use of waste plastic bottles for the production of bricks is an optimal method to solve the
problem of storing waste materials and to optimize the cost for the production of building materials. In
this study, plastic bottle waste in bottle factory will be used to incorporate with cement and sand to
produce sand bricks. The bricks will then be tested to study the compressive strength, water absorption
and efflorescence.
In the recent past research, the replacement and addition have be done with the direct inclusion of
polyethylene or plastic fibre, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in shredded form, chemically
treated polyethylene fibre, PET in aggregate form by replacing natural coarse aggregate. Most of
replacements have been done by volume calculation, and showed the decreased in compressive strength
as the plastic fibre increased. In this study, recycled plastic bottle have been introduced in crush form
as the fibre [5]. The replacement has been done by weight calculation instead of volume calculation.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The increase in the popularity of using environmental friendly, low cost and lightweight
construction materials in building industry has brought about the need to investigate how this can be
achieved by benefiting to the environment as well as maintaining the material requirements affirmed in
the standards. Brick is one of the most accommodating masonry units as a building material due to its
35
Wahid et al.,2015
properties. Attempts have been made to incorporate waste in the production of bricks such as the use of
paper processing residues, cigarette butts, fly ash, textile effluent treatment plant (ETP) sludge,
polystyrene foam, plastic fiber, straw, polystyrene fabric, cotton waste, dried sludge collected from an
industrial wastewater treatment plant, rice husk ash, granulated blast furnace slag, rubber, craft pulp
production residue, limestone dust and wood sawdust, processed waste tea, petroleum effluent
treatment plant sludge, welding flux slag and waste paper pulp [6].
In [3], it describes the used of various types of waste materials in different proportions and adopted
different methods to produce bricks. Different tests were conducted on produced bricks to evaluate
their properties following the various available standards. Compressive strength and water absorption
are two common parameters considered by most researchers as required by various standards. It is
noted that although many of the studied bricks made from waste materials meet the various standard
requirements and a number of patents have been approved, so far commercial production and
application of bricks from waste materials is still very limited. The limited production and application
of bricks from waste materials is also related to the absence of relevant standards and the slow
acceptance by industry and public. Standardization plays an important role in disseminating
knowledge, exploiting research results and reducing time to market for innovations.
Recently, in [5] mentioned that there are various research works have been done to find out the safe
and environment friendly disposal of plastics. India generates 56 lakh tons of plastic waste annually,
where Delhi accounting for staggering 689.5 tons a day. Approximately, 60% of total plastic waste is
collected and recycled in the country per day and remain is uncollected and littered. Besides of that,
concrete all over the globe has been utilized for the required infrastructure. Both materials
consumptions are increasing day by day in their respective field. The inclusion of waste plastic in
concrete by replacing or adding the concrete ingredients is one of the appropriate ways to dispose it.
In term of costing, cost comparison of available walling materials in Makurdi metropolis showed
that the use of bricks made from 45% sand and 5% cement resulted in a saving of 30%-47% when
compared with the use of sand concrete blocks. While the use of fired clay bricks resulted in a savings
of 19% per square meter of wall. The study therefore recommends the use of laterite bricks in Makurdi
and other locations due to its more economical and environmental friendly than fired clay bricks [4].
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
Plastic waste preparation
The main objective of this research work is to develop an efficient way to utilize the waste of
plastic bottle which is a great threat for the sustainment of ecological balance. The plastic bottles waste
was collected from Global Dynamic (M) Sdn Bhd located at Bukit Kor, Marang, Terengganu,
Malaysia. The rejected bottles which have defects were collected and put into crusher to form small
pieces. Then, the plastics were sieved to choose the smallest size. The steps are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Plastic waste preparation
36
J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 5(1)35-44, 2015
Sand Bricks preparation
The sand brick preparation was done at SIZ Hardware and Supplier Sdn. Bhd Dungun
Terengganu Malaysia. The proportion of sand, sand dust and cement (9:9:4) were put into the mixer.
Then, two buckets of water (ratio of 2) were poured and mixed up together. The plastics materials then
were put into ratios and were mixed together with the raw materials. Finally, the mixture was put into
the mold to form bricks.
Figure 2: Sand bricks preparation
Sand Bricks Testing
Three types of testing were conducted in this research work, which is compression test as per BS
5628: Part 1: 1992, water absorption test and efflorescence test as per CSA A82 standard.
37
Wahid et al.,2015
a) Compression test (BS 5628: Part 1: 1992)
This test is done to know the compressive strength of brick. It is also called crushing strength of
brick. Generally, 3 specimens of bricks are taken to laboratory for testing and tested one by one. In
this test, a brick specimen is put on crushing machine and applied pressure till it breaks. The
ultimate pressure at which brick is crushed is taken into account. All five brick specimens are tested
one by one and average result is taken as brick's compressive/crushing strength. The procedures are
explained in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Procedures for compression test
b) Water absorption test
In this test, bricks are weighed in dry condition and let them immersed in fresh water for 24 hours.
After 24 hours of immersion, those are taken out from water and wipe out with cloth. Then, brick is
weighed in wet condition. The difference between weights is the water absorbed by brick. The
percentage of water absorption is then calculated. The less water absorbed by brick the greater its
quality. Good quality brick doesn't absorb more than 20% water of its own weight. The process is
shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Water absorption test process
38
J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 5(1)35-44, 2015
Procedures
i. Dry the specimen in a ventilated oven at a temperature of 105°C to 115°C till it attains substantially
constant mass.
ii. Cool the specimen to room temperature and obtain its weight (M1) specimen too warm to touch
shall not be used for this purpose.
iii. Immerse completely dried specimen in clean water at a temperature of 27+2°C for 24 hours.
iv. Remove the specimen and wipe out any traces of water with damp cloth and weigh the specimen
after it has been removed from water (M2).
v. Water absorption, % by mass, after 24 hours immersion in cold water as shown in equation 1.
(1)
c) Efflorescence test (CSA A82)
The presence of alkalis in bricks is harmful where it forms a gray or white layer on brick surface by
absorbing moisture. To find out the presence of alkalis in bricks, this test is performed. In this test, a
brick is immersed in fresh water for 24 hours. Then, it is taken out from water and allowed to dry in
shade. If the whitish layer is not visible on surface, it proofs that absence of alkalis in brick. If the
whitish layer visible about 10% of brick surface, then the presence of alkalis is in acceptable range.
If that is about 50% of surface, then it is moderate. If the alkali’s presence is over 50%, then the
brick is severely affected by alkalis.
Procedures
i. Distilled water to be filled in a dish of suitable size. The dish should be made of glass, porcelain or
glazed stone ware.
ii. Place the end of the bricks in the dish, the depth of immersion in water being 25mm. Place the
whole arrangements in a warm (for example, 20oC to 30oC) well ventilated room until all the water
in the dish is absorbed by the specimen and the surface water evaporate.
iii. Cover the dish with suitable cover, so that excessive evaporation from the dish may not occur.
iv. When the water has been absorbed and bricks appear to be dry, place a similar quantity of water in
the dish and allow it to evaporate as before.
v. Examine the bricks for efflorescence after the second evaporation and report the results as:
- NIL-When there is not perceptible deposit of efflorescence
- SLIGHT-Not more than 10% area of the brick covered with a thin deposit of salt.
- MODERATE-Covering up to 50% area of the brick.
- HEAVY-Covering 50% or more but unaccompanied by powdering or flacking of the brick surface.
- SERIOUS-When there is a heavy deposit of salts accompanied by powdering and/or flacking of the
exposed surfaces.
39
Wahid et al.,2015
Figure 5: Efflorescence test process
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of Different Ratio of Plastic Waste on Compression Test
Table 1: Maximum load and compressive strength of different ratio of plastic waste
Sample
Weight (kg)
Density (kg/m3)
Max load at crushing (kN)
Compressive strength (kN/m2)
0%
2.60
1994.4
252.67
12404.03
5%
2.42
1856.3
236.67
11618.56
10%
2.40
1840.9
121.33
5956.31
15%
2.10
1610.8
60.67
2978.39
From the compression test result, it is clearly showed that the value of compressive strength
decrease as the ratio of plastic waste increase. The virgin (0% plastic waste) sand brick showed the
40
J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 5(1)35-44, 2015
highest value of compressive strength of 252.67kN. This followed by 5%, 10% and 15% plastic waste
which are 236.67kN, 121.33kN and 60.67kN. The same goes to maximum load values as shown in
Figure 6. The values decrease as the plastic waste ratio increase. This might be because of the plastic
waste does not possess cemntitious property. It does not bind well with the cement and thus the
strength was subsequently reduced. Figure 5 shows the compressive strength versus plastic waste ratio.
Due to the crushy nature of the grinded bottle waste, the strength was reduced with the increase in
proportion of the waste. This result showed the same trend as the previous research for the flakes type
of plastic waste conducted by [1].
Figure 6: Graph of compressive strength versus plastic waste ratio
Figure 7: Graph of maximum load versus plastic waste ratio
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0% 5% 10% 15%
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (kN/mm2)
PLASTIC WASTE RATIO
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT
RATIO OF PLASTIC WASTE
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0% 5% 10% 15%
MAX LOAD AT CRUSHING (kN)
PLASTIC WASTE RATIO
MAXIMUM LOAD AT CRUSHING OF
DIFFERENT RATIO OF PLASTIC WASTE
41
Wahid et al.,2015
Effect of Different Ratio of Plastic Waste on Water Absorption Test
Table 2: Percentage water absorbed of different ratio of plastic waste
Sample
Weight before (kg)
Weight after (kg)
% water absorbed
0%
2.60
3.20
23.08
5%
2.42
2.77
14.46
10%
2.40
2.67
11.25
15%
2.10
2.13
9.52
Water absorption test showed excellent performance of the plastic waste brick. As the plastic
waste ratio increase, the percentage of water absorption decreases. The values range from 14.46% to
9.52%. The virgin bricks showed poor performance since it absorbed 23.08% of water. Good quality of
bricks shall not absorb more than 20% of water. This concludes that the presence of plastic waste in the
bricks helps on the performance of the bricks.
Figure 8: Graph of different of water absorbed versus plastic waste ratio
Figure 9: Graph percentage of water absorbed versus plastic waste ratio
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0% 5% 10% 15%
WATER ABSORPTION (kg)
PLATIC WASTE RATIO
DIFFERENT OF WATER ABSORPTION
BEFORE AND AFTER IMMERSION
WEIGHT BEFORE
WEIGHT AFTER
0
5
10
15
20
25
0% 5% 10% 15%
% WATER ABSORBED
PLASTIC WASTE RATIO
PERCENTAGE OF WATER ABSORBED OF
DIFFERENT PLASTIC WASTE RATIO
42
J. Basic. Appl. Sci. Res., 5(1)35-44, 2015
Effect of Different Ratio of Plastic Waste on Efflorescence Test
Table 3: Salt deposited of different ratio of plastic waste
Sample
NIL
SLIGHT
MODERATE
HEAVY
SERIOUS
0%
√
5%
√
10%
√
15%
√
The efflorescence test also showed the excellence performance of the sand bricks. There is no
absence of grey or a white deposit was shown on its sand bricks surfaces for all ratios. It was showed
that all of the sand bricks indicate no absence of soluble salts or alkali. From this test, we can conclude
that no alkalis was presence in this sand brick.
Figure 10: Efflorescence observation
CONCLUSION
The comprehensive strength decreases with increasing waste plastic ratios. The virgin (0% plastic
waste) sand brick showed the highest value of compressive strength of 252.67kN. This followed by
5%, 10% and 15% plastic waste which are 236.67kN, 121.33kN and 60.67kN. This may be attributed
to the decrease in the adhesive strength between the waste plastic and the cement paste. It seems that
the bonding between the plastic particles and the cement paste is weak. However, the mixes of sand
bricks and plastics waste seems possible because water absorption less than 15% for all ratios.
Furthermore, there are only slight salt/alkalis presence in the sand bricks mixes with plastic waste. The
reduced compressive strength values of waste plastic bricks mixes show that it can be used only in
situations that required low-degree workability. Such situations are numerous in civil engineering
applications, namely, precast bricks, partition wall panels, canal linings, and so forth. Recommendation
for further study, it will emphasize on grind the waste into fine powder and mix into such proportion to
achieve maximum packing density. It may result to increase in compressive strength and binder, or
plasticizer should be added to the mixture to increase the bind between plastic surface and cement
particle [2].
43
Wahid et al.,2015
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance and constructive comments provided by Mr Zairi
Ismael Rizman in the completion of this paper.
REFERENCES
1. Arora, A. and U.V. Dave, 2013. Utilization of E-Waste and Plastic Bottle Waste in Concrete.
International Journal of Students Research in Technology & Management, 1 (4): 398-406.
2. Rai, B., S.T. Rushad, B. Kr and S.K. Duggal, 2012. Study of Waste Plastic Mix Concrete with
Plasticizer. ISRN Civil Engineering, 2012: 1-5.
3. Zhang, L., 2013. Production of Bricks from Waste Materials-A Review. Construction and
Building Materials, 47: 643-655.
4. Hiremath, P.M., S. Shetty, P.G.N. Rai and T.B. Prathima, 2014. Utilization of Waste Plastic in
Manufacturing of Plastic-Soil Bricks. International Journal of Technology Enhancements and
Emerging Engineering Research, 2 (4): 102-107.
5. Raju and R. Chauhan, 2014. An Experimental Study on Strength Behaviour of Cement Concrete
with Use of Plastic Fibre. National Conference on Advances in Engineering and Technology, pp:
30-34.
6. Raut, S.P., R.V. Ralegaonkar and S.A. Mandavgane, 2011. Development of Sustainable
Construction Material Using Industrial and Agricultural Solid Waste: A Review of Waste-Create
Bricks. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (10): 4037-4042.
44