Content uploaded by Gorazd Mesko
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Gorazd Mesko on Feb 06, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
Za človeka gre! Zbornik posvečen zaslužnemu profesorju dr. Vinko Skalarju
Abstract
A collection of essays dedicated to Professor Emeritus Vinko Skalar (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia).
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
(Slovensko spodaj)
The book is in Slovene and analyzes the development of the Bologna Process in its first period (until 2004):
Chapter 1: The emergence of the Bologna Process
Chapter 2: From Prague 2001 to Berlin 2003 and onwards
Chapter 3. Three dimensions of the Bologna Process
The book has two appendices; the first includes a Slovenian translation of key (and also some contextual) documents of the Process up to and including 2004, and the second recommendations of the official "Bologna seminars" during the same period. The first appendix contains a comparison of the working versions and the final text of the Bologna Declaration 1999 (bilingual, English original and Slovenian translation); pp. 181-186.
POVZETEK
Knjiga analizira razvoj t.im. bolonjskega procesa v njegovem prvem obodbju (do leta 2004):
1. poglavje: Nastanek bolonjskega procesa
2. poglavje: Od Prage 2001 do Berlina 2003 in naprej
3. poglavje: Tri razsežnosti bolonjskega procesa
Knjiga ima dva dodatka; prvi vključuje slovenski prevod ključnih (in tudi nekaterih kontekstualnih) dokumentov procesa do vključno 2004, drugi pa priporočila t.i. uradnih "bolonjskih seminarjev" v istem obdobju. V prvem dodatku je objavljena primerjava delovnih verzij in končnega besedila Bolonjske deklaracije 1999 (dvojezično, angleški izvirnik in slovenski prevod).
An innovative, multi-perspective and international approach to the issues which normalisation entails. Carrying on from the concept of community care, normalisation or integration is about creating the conditions in the individual and society for leading as autonomous and acceptable a life as possible. Based on the right of people with disabilities to an ordinary life, it has extensive implications not just for professionals in the mental health field but for all of us.
Three decades ago, it was widely believed by criminologists and policymakers that "nothing works" to reform offenders and that "rehabilitation is dead" as a guiding correctional philosophy. By contrast, today there is a vibrant movement to reaffirm rehabilitation and to implement programs based on the principles of effective intervention. How did this happen? I contend that the saving of rehabilitation was a contingent reality that emerged due to the efforts of a small group of loosely coupled research criminologists. These scholars rejected the "nothing works" professional ideology and instead used rigorous science to show that popular punitive interventions were ineffective, that offenders were not beyond redemption, and that treatment programs rooted in criminological knowledge were capable of meaningfully reducing recidivism. Their story is a reminder that, under certain conditions, the science of criminology is capable of making an important difference in the correctional enterprise, if not far beyond.