A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Biodiversity and Conservation
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL PAPER
How are arthopod communities structured and why are
they so diverse? Answers from Mediterranean mountains
using hierarchical additive partitioning
Konstantina Zografou
1
•Robert J. Wilson
2
•
John M. Halley
1
•Elli Tzirkalli
1
•Vassiliki Kati
1
Received: 15 May 2016 / Revised: 2 December 2016 / Accepted: 24 January 2017 /
Published online: 31 January 2017
ÓSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017
Abstract Mountains are complex ecosystems supporting a great variety of taxa. Here, we
explored the diversity patterns of arthropods in two mountains, pinpointing the spatial scale
that accounts most for overall diversity variation, using an additive partitioning framework.
Butterflies and Orthoptera were sampled in Rodopi (2012) and Grammos (2013) moun-
tains. Diversity was partitioned into five hierarchical levels (mountain, elevational zone,
habitat, transect and plot). We compared the estimated diversity values for each level to the
respective permuted values expected by chance, for all species, as well as for species
identified as ‘‘rare’’ or ‘‘common’’. At broader spatial levels, the variation in total diversity
was attributed to the beta diversity component: mountains accounted for 20.94 and 26.25%
of butterfly and Orthoptera diversity, and elevational zones accounted for 28.94 and
35.87% respectively. At finer spatial scales, beta diversity was higher than expected by
chance in terms of the Shannon index. The type of habitat was found to play a significant
role only for rare orthopterans. Finally, common species were recognized for shaping
overall species diversity. We highlight the importance of the spatial levels of elevation
zone and then mountain position in conservation planning, due to the greater beta diversity
recorded at this scale as compared to habitat or more finite scales. Monitoring programs
might need to adapt different strategies with respect to the focal organisms, and consider
patterns of common rather than rare species that found to drive the patterns of the entire
community.
Communicated by Jan C. Habel.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1303-2)
contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
&Konstantina Zografou
ntinazografou@yahoo.co.uk
1
Department of Biological Applications and Technology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
2
College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK
123
Biodivers Conserv (2017) 26:1333–1351
DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1303-2
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.