BookPDF Available

The Power of Systems: How Policy Sciences Opened Up the Cold War World

Authors:

Abstract

In The Power of Systems, Egle Rindzeviciute introduces readers to one of the best-kept secrets of the Cold War: the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, an international think tank established by the U.S. and Soviet governments to advance scientific collaboration. From 1972 until the late 1980s IIASA in Austria was one of the very few permanent platforms where policy scientists from both sides of the Cold War divide could work together to articulate and solve world problems. This think tank was a rare zone of freedom, communication, and negotiation, where leading Soviet scientists could try out their innovative ideas, benefit from access to Western literature, and develop social networks, thus paving the way for some of the key science and policy breakthroughs of the twentieth century. Ambitious diplomatic, scientific, and organizational strategies were employed to make this arena for cooperation work for global change. Under the umbrella of the systems approach, East-West scientists co-produced computer simulations of the long-term world future and the anthropogenic impact on the environment, using global modeling to explore the possible effects of climate change and nuclear winter. Their concern with global issues also became a vehicle for transformation inside the Soviet Union. The book shows how computer modeling, cybernetics, and the systems approach challenged Soviet governance by undermining the linear notions of control on which Soviet governance was based and creating new objects and techniques of government.
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 1 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 2 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 3 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 4 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 5 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 6 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 7 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 8 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 9 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 10 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 11 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 12 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 13 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 14 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 15 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 16 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 17 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 18 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 19 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 20 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 21 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 22 5/27/16 4:36 PM
552-64613_ch01_1P.indd 23 5/27/16 4:36 PM
... Invented before World War II, the concept of the Noosphere only became truly popular after the end of the war and inspired the creation of UNESCO and other global noospheric institutions. From its very conception, it crossed the divides of the Cold War, on the one hand, popularized by the Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin, and on the other popular among thinkers in the USSR until its collapse (Rindzevičiūtė, 2016). These ideas were shared by John Desmond Bernal, a physicist, and communist, who, on the one hand, was considered the forefather of transhumanism. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
In this chapter, I ask whether it is possible to recover the hope that Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky associated with the notion of Noosphere, a knowledge that encompasses the entire planet and represents a new level of systemic self-organization of humanity. According to Vernadsky, the Noosphere is a new evolutionary stage in the development of the biosphere when human-and-nature interaction will be consciously balanced. For Vernadsky, it was a cause for hope, a chance for global, rational humanity capable of directing its own destiny. For many contemporaries, those attached to the Anthropocene-style doom-pill narrative are a source of dismay. In this chapter, I want to show how we came from hope to doom and point out that this process involved both the ideological struggles of the Cold War and the hegemony of capitalism, which in its neoliberal form promotes a non-alternative capitalist realism. For this purpose, I will analyze the emergence of a FUD strategy (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt). It originated initially as the so-called tobacco strategy, which was a way for tobacco corporations to rid themselves of responsibility for the fact that smoking caused cancer. This strategy became the matrix for other fights around knowledge concerning: acid rain, vaccinations , or, finally, global climate change. As a result, knowledge structures are thus threatened today by deliberately manufactured ignorance. In conclusion , I ask whether we are able today to recreate the hope of Noosphere and reinvigorate universalistic global institutions to stabilize knowledge structures for a future World Society. 108 Andrzej W. Nowak Wouldn't it be better to spin narratives of how humans are marvelously resourceful creatures who could do a lot better with the intellectual, social, and material resources we have? That new collectivities could together make a world better than the capitalist mess we've inherited? As someone who finds the temptation of pessimism too alluring, I keep reminding myself that recovering a utopian sensibility is about the most practical thing we could do right now. Dystopia is for losers. (Henwood, 2012, 15)
... 26 Cybernetics, for one, evolved from being a tool for socialist progress to a tool for analyzing systemic issues of state socialism and outlining a liberal model of society. 27 The post-Stalinist era of the 1960s saw a major debate between technocratic and humanist strands of Marxism. In their book Civilizace na rozcestí (Civilization at the crossroads, 1967), technocratically oriented Czechoslovak Marxists around Radovan Richta offered a socialist vision of postindustrial society, governed by technocratic means and the latest science. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter analyses the discourses of moral and ecological crisis in the first years of Czech postsocialist transformation and their relation to the late socialist period. The chapter investigates how liberal ecologists came to understand what they diagnosed as ecological crisis as a moral crisis and a failure of state socialism. It explores how Josef Vavroušek and Bedřich Moldan, former state-socialist experts who became environment ministers after 1989, came to see state socialism as anti-ecological, aligned themselves to varying degrees with market liberalism and put their hopes into legal mechanisms and environmental ethics that would regulate the markets. It also suggests that the two ministers’ discourse of ecological-cum-moral crisis as at once a specific historical experience and a part of global crisis was another way to signal a ‘return’ to Europe and participate in global politics. The first part of the chapter discusses how Vavroušek used the language of cybernetics to describe ecological crisis as a failure of state socialism and propose a new global environmental programme, while emphasising the values of humanism and sustainability as a corrective to the market economy. The second part examines the way Moldan used the figure of the tragedy of commons, presenting ecological crisis as a case against state socialism and for the market, and his belief in Christian values as neoliberalism’s moral compass.
... 33 There, the department of mathematical economics was founded in 1968 by Nikita Moiseev. On Moiseev seeRindzevičiūtė (2016). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
What are the effects of authoritarian regimes on scholarly research in economics? And how might economic theory survive ideological pressures? The article addresses these questions by focusing on the mathematization of economics over the past century and drawing on the history of Soviet science. Mathematics in the USSR remained internationally competitive and generated many ideas that were taken up and played important roles in economic theory. These same ideas, however, were disregarded or adopted only in piecemeal fashion by Soviet economists, despite the efforts of influential scholars to change the economic research agenda. The article draws this contrast into sharper focus by exploring the work of Soviet mathematicians in optimization, game theory, and probability theory that was used in Western economics. While the intellectual exchange across the Iron Curtain did help advance the formal modeling apparatus, economics could only thrive in an intellectually open environment absent under the Soviet rule.
Chapter
This chapter examines the role of economics and economists in the Soviet Union. Stalinist policies resulted in a particular model of relations between the social sciences and the state that severely limited the scientific autonomy and professional agency of economists. Despite opportunities for expansion in economic research and education, particularly after World War II, economics remained subordinate to party ideology and academic administration, where it played a predominantly technical role. The postwar resurgence of economics as a political science, driven by heightened Cold War competition and a focus on science and technology for economic and social progress, led to the emergence of new institutions and reformist identities within economics and facilitated dialogue between Western and socialist economists. We also examine how this movement fostered a distinct technocratic mindset and reformist ethos among economists, who sought to introduce various tools to improve existing planning and management practices, yet struggled to balance loyalty to the state with structural constraints.
Chapter
Full-text available
Zusammenfassung Das International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) wurde 1972 in Laxenburg bei Wien gegründet und war das weltweit erste Forschungsinstitut, an dem – dem eigenen Anspruch zufolge – Wissenschaftler:innen von Ost und West gemeinsam an der Lösung globaler oder transnationaler Probleme arbeiten sollten. Nach einer Beschreibung der Gründung des IIASA wendet sich der vorliegende Beitrag den Analysemethoden zu, die bei IIASA zum Einsatz kamen, und zeichnet anhand der Geschichte dieser Analysemethoden Wechselwirkungen zwischen Organisationsform und Erkenntnisform nach, die den Forschungsalltag am IIASA in den ersten zwei Jahrzehnten seines Bestehens prägten. Aufgrund seiner spezifischen Ausrichtung und Organisationsform, bot das IIASA eine förderliche Umgebung für die Entwicklung eines innovativen Zugangs zu jenen epistemologischen, methodologischen und wissenspolitischen Problemen, mit denen sich eine global ausgerichtete Erforschung des Planeten und seiner Bewohner:innen in der zweiten Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts konfrontiert sah.
Article
Full-text available
This paper engages with the literature that has looked at the historical response to climate change among industries positioned to have had a far-reaching impact on changing the course of the climate crisis. While much of the historical research in this domain has focused on the role of big oil companies, the utility industry and conservative think tanks in the manufacturing of doubt regarding climate science and opposing ambitions climate policies, our focus is on the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) – the world’s largest transnational business association. Unlike individual multinational corporations, the ICC developed a close ties and collaborations with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), which made ICC positioned to influence international policy discussions. This study finds that the ICC developed a dual strategy, which set aside climate change as the focus for discussion and business action. One strategy, led by ICC Environment Committee, involved intense collaboration with the United Nations and developing a business agenda for sustainable development. At the same time, the creation of the International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988 and the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change (INC) in 1991, gave rise to a parallel strategy, led by ICC’s related oil companies. As this study finds, the ICC’s Energy Committee developed close ties to the Global Climate Coalition, a front group designed to combat the scientific evidence of climate change. The paper concludes that the ICC was able to delay meaningful regulatory response to climate change the between 1988-1992 by forming a broad coalition of competing interests and collaborating with agencies established under the auspices of the United Nations.
Article
Full-text available
Non-technical summary This article uses water to examine how the relationships of ethics to science are modified through the pursuit of Earth stewardship. Earth stewardship is often defined as the use of science to actively shape social–ecological relations by enhancing resilience. The changing relations of science to values are explored by considering how ideas of resilience operate to translate different ways of knowing water into the framework of Earth stewardship. This is not a neutral process, and Earth stewardship requires careful appraisal to ensure other ways of knowing water are not oppressed. Technical summary Scientific disclosures of anthropogenic impacts on the Earth system – the Anthropocene – increasingly come with ethical diagnoses for value transformation and, often, Earth stewardship. This article examines the changing relationship of science to values in calls for Earth stewardship with special attention to water resilience. The article begins by situating recent efforts to reconceptualize human–water relations in view of anthropogenic impacts on the global water system. It then traces some of the ways that Earth stewardship has been articulated, especially as a framework supporting the use of science to actively shape social–ecological relations by enhancing resilience. The shift in relations of ethics and science entailed by Earth stewardship is placed in historical context before the issues of water resilience are examined. Resilience, and critiques of it, are then discussed for how they operate to translate different ways of knowing water into the framework of Earth stewardship. The ethical stakes of such translations are a core concern of the conclusion. Rather than reducing different ways of knowing water to those amendable to the framework of Earth stewardship, the article advances a pluralized approach as needed to respect multiple practices for knowing and relating to water – and resilience. Social media summary Water resilience is key to Earth stewardship; Jeremy Schmidt examines how it changes relations of science and ethics.
Article
Full-text available
A quantum leap is under way in space as a domain of human activity. The global space economy has rapidly reached almost USD 450 billion in size and is projected to grow to over USD 1 trillion by the 2040s. There are hundreds of actors involved, from space agencies to private companies to start-ups. Over 70 countries have space programmes and 14 have launch capabilities. These developments have involved intense transnational and international co-operation and competition, across both the public and private sectors. With such rapid changes underway, this article takes stock of how these developments impact international relations. Overall, this is the first special issue in the field of international relations to use theories of diplomacy to bring to light the various ways in which experts, scientists, astronauts, space enthusiasts and professional diplomats, among others, have shaped the formal and informal interactions among states in this key area of foreign policy.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.