ChapterPDF Available

Ways of Seeing Data: Toward a Critical Literacy for Data Visualizations as Research Objects and Research Devices


Abstract and Figures

Gray, Bounegru, Milan and Ciuccarelli contribute towards a critical literacy for data visualizations as research objects and devices. The chapter argues for methodological reflexivity around the use of data visualizations in research as both instruments and objects of study. The authors develop a heuristic framework for studying three forms of mediation which data visualizations enact – drawing on research and insights from new media studies, science and technology studies, the history and philosophy of science, cultural studies and critical theory. The chapter illustrates these three forms of mediation with an analysis of visualizations of public finances from civil society organizations, media outlets and public institutions. The authors conclude with an argument towards a broader program of critical literacy for reading and doing research with data visualizations.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Electronic copy available at:
Chapter eleven
Jonathan Gray, Liliana Bounegru, Stefania Milan and Paolo Ciuccarelli
Ways of seeing data: Towards a critical literacy for data visualizations as research
objects and research devices
‘Every image embodies a way of seeing’, wrote the British art critic John Berger in his 1972
classic Ways of Seeing (Berger, 1972, p. 10). Through this book and accompanying
television series, he proposed elements of a critical literacy for making sense of the visual
landscapes that we inhabitfrom reproductions of art historical masterpieces to the
advertising which adorns our cities and media environments. As well as guiding the attention
of his viewers and readers around specific images, he also sought to examine the way in
which images are reproduced and mediated (drawing on the work of the German
philosopher and critic Walter Benjamin), as well as the broader social, cultural, economic
and political contexts around them.
In the digital age, data visualizations are becoming an increasingly prominent genre for
the visual representation and mediation of collective lifefrom digital analytics dashboards
to interactive news graphics. Similarly, data visualizations are becoming more and more
popular in media and communications studies, and in the humanities and social sciences
more broadly. According to Stephen Few, ‘data visualization is the graphical display of
abstract information for two purposes: sense-making (also called data analysis) and
communication’ (2014, n.p.). This might include, for example, the representation of
information about numbers, words, relations, times or locations. But why have data
visualizations become so prevalent? And what does it mean to approach data visualization
as a research device? What might it offer media and communications scholars? Data
Electronic copy available at:
visualizations promise to assist us in making sense of complex data and complex
phenomena, allowing us to simplify and bring order to dense information, for explanatory
and communicative purposes. They may help us to analyze, filter, browse and explore
complex information. Paraphrasing Marshall McLuhan (1962), data visualizations are said to
amplify our senses and our abilities to make sense of the world around us. But data
visualizations are not a neutral tool. They come with particular ‘ways of seeing’, particular
analytical, mediation and narrative regimes regarding which we ought to be attentive as we
use them to do research and tell stories.
Taking inspiration from Berger’s agenda, in this chapter we argue that the use of data
visualizations as both instruments and objects of study requires commensurate forms of
critical literacy. We also draw on Philip Agre’s (1997) notion of ‘critical technical practice’ for
the social study of artificial intelligence and from Bernhard Rieder and Theo Röhle’s (2012)
notion of ‘methodological reflexivity’ in relation to digital methods in the humanities and
social sciences, both of which gesture towards forms of engagement with new research
methods and technologies that are accompanied by critical reflection on their uses. We seek
to extend their proposition that research practices ought to ‘oscillate […] between concrete
technical work and methodological reflexivity’ (Rieder and Röhle, 2012, p. 80) to the practice
of working with data visualizations.
We argue that data visualizations are not only bright adornments to our twenty first
century information environments. They embody and engender not only particular ways of
seeing (as Berger comments), but also ways of knowing and ways of organizing collective
life in our digital age. In other words, data visualizations reflect and articulate their own
particular modes of rationality, epistemology, politics, culture and experience. It is precisely
to emphasize these ‘world-making’ capacities, that in this chapter we prefer the term ‘device’
to the more commonly utilized term ‘tool’ to refer to data visualization. While the term ‘tool’
establishes the object as possessing coherence and connotes an instrumental relationship
between user and object, this chapter proposes to develop an account of data visualizations
as devices in order to draw attention to their capacities to ‘assemble and arrange the world
in specific social and material patterns’ (Law and Ruppert, 2013, p. 230). While arriving to
media and communication studies with particular inscriptions as described above, following
Law and Ruppert (2013) we argue that data visualizations as device are at the same time
indeterminate and open to multiple and diverse forms of usage. For this reason, to follow
Marres and Gerlitz (2015), deploying data visualization in media and communication
research may be thought of as a process of developing mechanisms to align its affordances
(and limitations) with the discipline-specific conventions of our fields. Given the growing role
of data visualizations in our information environments, we think it is vital to develop a critical
literacy to read, understand and work with them.
We propose a three part heuristic framework for what should be taken into account when
reading, working with and conducting research about data visualizations. In doing so this
chapter does not aim to develop a practical guide for the effective use of visualization in
media and communication research, per se. Instead we propose a framework to sensitize
researchers to forms of mediation embedded in data visualization as research devices in
order to support their critical and reflexive use.
This framework is organized around three forms of mediation that can be studied in
relation to data visualizations: (i) the mediation from world to data of the sources of
information that underpin visualizations; (ii) the mediation from data to image of the graphical
representations of this information; and (iii) the mediation from image to eye and the mind in
the socially, culturally and historically specific ‘ways of seeing’ engendered in the data
visualization. Each of these three forms of mediation can be studied with a broad range of
methodsfrom more familiar qualitative and quantitative approaches (such as visual and
textual analysis, interviews or surveys), to emerging digital and computational methods. We
describe and illustrate these different forms of mediation, and ways of studying them, with
reference to a collection of over two hundred data visualizations about public finances.
While for heuristic purposes our framework proposes the study of mediations between
‘world’, ‘data’, ‘image and ‘eye’, our intention is to provide a starting point to inform and
broaden inquiry rather than to propose a neat and rigid distinction between these different
elements. They are in fact mutually constitutive such that data constitute as much as they
represent the societal dynamics which they measure (Espeland and Stevens, 2008) and that
regimes of measurement and visualization are generative of specific publics, practices and
cultures (Ruppert, 2015). The forms of mediation which we propose are also not exhaustive.
For example, drawing on research on the reactivity of metrics (Espeland and Sauder, 2007;
Gerlitz and Lury, 2014), a fourth layer of mediation could be formulated, concerned with the
study of actions to intervene, respond to and modify the dynamics captured by data
visualizations. In addition to this, as the following sections will show, each of the three forms
of mediation is actually constituted by multiple sub-layers of mediation or inscription. These
will vary according to the nature of the ‘research apparatus’ in which visualizations are
embedded, in that different types of data and methods are accompanied by different types of
inscription (Ruppert, 2013). We also do not hold a strict order with regard to the proposed
layers of mediation.
The past few decades have seen the development of a body of literature dedicated to
data visualization and information graphics. In particular there is a growing body of books
and articles offering practical guidance as well as showcasing different examples,
techniques and approaches.1 This literature is itself interesting not only from a practical
perspective, but also as a way to understand the forms of mediation involved in the
composition of data visualizationsboth those that receive attention and those that remain
neglectedas well as the aesthetics, cultures, values, ideals and practices associated with
their production. These resources can be useful as a source to disassemble and understand
the making of data visualization projects.
1 See, for example: Cairo, 2012; Card et al., 1999; Cleveland, 1993, 1994; Few, 2009, 2012, 2013; Heller and Landers, 2014;
Katz, 2012; Krum, 2013; Lima, 2011; McCandless, 2012, 2014; Meirelles, 2013; Munzner, 2014; Murray, 2013; Rendgen,
2012, 2014; Spence, 2014; Steele and Iliinsky, 2010; Tactical Technology Collective, 2014; Tufte, 1990, 1997ab, 2001;
Wong, 2013; Yau, 2011, 2013.
While many of these works focus on a single layer of mediation that of data to the
image, looking at how information is translated into graphical form we suggest that in using
and studying data visualizations it is essential to grasp not just the production of images
from data but also the datasets and data infrastructures that data visualizations draw on, as
well as the cultural practices and ideals implicated in the composition of visualizations which
invite a particular way of seeing. There have been a number of very informative works on
this latter topic (for example Drucker, 2014; Halpern, 2015), which we will explore further
below. Here our focus is less on data visualization as a field, but rather on developing the
elements of a critical reflexivity that would accompany and inform the practice of data
visualization in research and other contexts. This critical reflexivity is important not only in
the study of data visualizations as objects, but also to improve our abilities to deploy them as
research devices. Below we outline research outlooks and methods for studying all three
forms of mediation as well as pointing to further resources that may be useful for each
An Example: Visualizing Information about Public Finances
To illustrate our proposed framework we have chosen to work with a collection of data
visualization projects about public finances. These include data visualization projects from
media organizations, journalists, civil society organizations and public institutions. This
collection has been gathered in the context of research to empirically map how information
about public finances is used in the service of democratic engagement with fiscal policy
(Gray, 2015ab).
Figure 11.1: A selection from collection of examples of fiscal data visualizations (Gray,
There are two main reasons why we consider this thematic focus suitable to make our case.
Firstly, there is a long tradition of work exploring public finances with information graphics.
Edward Tufte uses public finances to illustrate discussion of different techniques in his
classic The Visual Display of Quantitative Information citing a venerable tradition of
information graphics which ‘nearly always create the impression that spending and debt are
rapidly increasing’ (Tufte, 2001, p. 65). He alludes to the fiscal information graphics of the
Scottish engineer, economist and pioneer of statistical graphics William Playfair, such as this
Figure 11.2: ‘Chart of the National Debt of England’ from William Playfair’s The Commercial
and Political Atlas (Playfair, 1801).
The second reason is that there is a heterogeneous constellation of different issues and
concerns that are associated with public finances and fiscal policy. As well as political and
economic questions from who in society pays how much tax and how public resources are
allocatedmany policy areas are underpinned by discussions about public finances, from
international development to climate change. The complexity and competing narratives
around this topic makes it well suited to illustrate different approaches for studying data
Three Forms of Mediation and How to Study Them
In this section we will propose a research outlook and methods for studying each of the
three forms of mediation implicated in the creation of data visualizations that we have
outlined This may serve as a checklist of questions and a menu of different methods that
can be used.
1. From World to Data
As we shall see in the next section, many classic works on information visualization focus on
the mediation of data to imagein particular focusing on the avoidance of
misrepresentation. For example, Tufte suggests that ‘graphical excellence requires telling
the truth about data’ (Tufte, 2001, p. 51) and that data visualization designers should ‘let the
data speak for itself’ (1997a, p. 45), championing an aesthetic program of ‘graphical integrity’
that we shall challenge and explore further below. But what about the data itself? How does
the making of data shape the making of knowledge through visualizations?
Our first form of mediation to be studied is how the data used in the visualization is
generated and how this process inscribes itself in the knowledge produced through data
visualizations. This might include asking questions such as:
! What information or data is being represented in the visualization?
! What are the sources for this information? Where does the data come from?
! How is the data generated? What are the rationales, methods and standards
inscribed in the data infrastructures through which the data is generated?
! How is the data transformed or prepared?
! Which data sources are combined and how?
! How does the data selectively prioritize certain things over others?
The first step will often be establishing the data sources. In some cases details about the
sources of the information will be explicitly referenced or linked to. In other cases additional
work might be needed in order to identify these sources. This might be matching the precise
tables or datasets that are used from a number of possible contenders (for example, in
cases where the institution or database is given, but not the exact table or dataset); looking
in the software source code or documentation of the visualization to look for data sources; or
conducting interviews with the creators of a data visualization to establish what data was
Once datasets are established for a given visualization, there are different approaches to
studying and analyzing them. For example, the study of data sources might draw on
literature about ‘sourcing practices’ from media studies and journalism studies (Cottle, 2003;
Manning, 2001; Hall et al., 1978; Berkowitz, 2009). Research can also be undertaken on the
‘data infrastructures implicated in the production of the datasets that are used in the
visualizations. Drawing on previous work in this area, we take the phrase ‘data infrastructure’
to designate socio-technical systems implicated in the creation, processing and distribution
of data (see, for example, Akrich, 1992). This might include elements such as standards
bodies, software systems, administrative procedures, committees, consultancy processes
and many other things (Gray and Davies, 2015).2 Here it may be useful to draw on
approaches from scienc and technology studies (STS) to trace the politics embedded in
these systemsfor example through what has been called ‘infrastructure ethnography’ (see,
for example, Star and Ruhleder, 1996; Star, 1999; Bowker and Star, 2000). The composition
2 Gray and Bounegru are currently working on another project on ‘data infrastructure literacy’, which includes further
suggestions on approaches to studying and working with data infrastructures.
of data infrastructures will lead to the production of different types of datafrom statistical
data to transactional ‘digital traces’ extracted from digital platforms.
How might we operationalise these approaches in relation to our collection of data
visualizations about public money? Firstly, can we identify the datasets that are used in the
visualizations? The different ways of citing or linking to data sources is itself something that
can be studiedas it may reflect different kinds of ideals, norms or practices of knowledge
production. A cursory look at different data sourcing practices reveals a wide range of ways
in which data is obtained and prepared, as well as varying approaches to publishing details
about datasets, software and methodology.
Figure 11.3: Data sources for ‘The Tax Gap’ visualization from the Guardian Datablog and
Information is Beautiful.
In our collection, some of the projects simply cite the name of the department from which the
data was derived. One example from the New York Times simply says ‘Source: Office of
Management and Budget’, with no further details.3 Many others give much more detail
including directly linking to datasets, or even providing documentation on methodology about
how the data was sourced and transformed, what assumptions were made, and so on. For
example a piece from the US investigative news outlet ProPublica on ‘The Millions New York
Counties Coulda Got’ is accompanied by a short methodological walkthrough titled ‘How We
Analyzed New York County Tobacco Bonds’ explaining how they obtained the data, which
the cash flow models that they used and why, and the rationales behind other assumptions
they made in the application.4
Publishing data sources has become de rigueur amongst some data journalism outlets. A
piece from the South China Morning Post explains how data was extracted from PDF files
and provides links to the ‘raw data’ used in the visualizations.5 One data visualization from
the Guardian Datablog gives an accompanying spreadsheet which lists a separate source
URL for every figure that they have used.6 If visualization projects publish the source code of
their software, this can be studied in order to see the data files which have been used. For
example, the Budget Key project by Israeli non-profit Public Knowledge Workshop link to
their source code on the social software sharing platform GitHub which makes visible the
changes and transformations that have been made on the data.7
As well as looking at the sourcing and transformation of the data, we might also look at
the selection of particular datasets and tables to highlight or narrate certain aspects of public
3 (accessed 10
March 2016).
4 See and
york-county-tobacco-bonds (accessed 10 March 2016).
5 (accessed 10 March 2016).
6 (accessed 10 March 2016).
7 (accessed 10 March 2016).
finances such as spending, revenue or debt. Rather than simply ‘telling the truth’ about
public financesthese selections emphasize and de-emphasize different aspects of fiscal
policy. We shall further examine the affordances of different visual forms in the next section.
Suffice to say here that the selection of different datasets and tables is an important step
that should be taken into account in the study of data visualizationsprior to their translation
into graphical form. We can compare the data mediated in the visualization to the other data
which is made available. Which indicators, subtables or items of data have been selected,
which have been left out and how does this guide our attention towards some things and not
An interactive news application from The Times (UK) called ‘The Wall of Debt’ shows a
dominant wall of red bricks depicting ‘national debt’, and a comparatively small green wall
called ‘cuts’.8 The visual editorial decision to select these two items is an important one in
reading this interactive graphic, engaging with a particular political economic narrative about
tackling public debt through spending cuts. Another short video clip called ‘Debtris’ by David
McCandless presents a wide variety of other fiscal data points, ultimately highlighting how
the global cost of the credit crisis dwarfs other sums such as the Organization of the
Petroleum Exporting Countries’ climate change fund, the budget of the UN, African debt to
the West and the funds needed to ‘save the Amazon rainforest’.9 As well as looking at the
selection of data on a case by case basis for individual visualizations, comparative analysis
may be undertaken across a larger collection.
We might also study the composition of the data itself. We could study the headers,
categories and classifications within the datasets to understand which variables and
indicators are selected and prioritized. Content analysis of documentation and associated
8 (accessed 10 March 2016).
9 (accessed 10 March 2016).
materials may provide further details about the units, forms of analysis, methodology,
software, standards and other details about how the data was generated. This might also be
supplemented by interviews with those involved in the creation of the data about their
decisions. It may be that datasets are generated from other more complex database
systems which may be of interest to study. In the case of public financial data, we might look
into politics, rationales and ways of knowing inscribed into the financial management
information systems through which datasets about public finance are generated. These may
be studied as socio-technical systems through, for example, document analysis and
interviews. Sometimes there may be documentation manuals which explain how these
systems function. In the case of public sector data infrastructures, if details are not already
published, then there may be routes for formally requesting them through access to
information laws. Researchers and civil society groups interested in studying what was the
most detailed source of information about public spending in the UK (the Combined Online
Information System, or COINS) submitted official ‘freedom of information’ requests about the
database. While their requests for its contents were initially turned down, they submitted
follow up requests asking about the database and training materials for the database, which
were successful.10
It may also be fruitful to study the categories and classification systems articulated by the
data. For example, any of the data visualizations about public money use different
categories to describe different areas of expenditure. Where do these categories come
from? How did they become the way that they are? On the one hand we can look at the
administrative contexts in which the datasets are generatedsuch as the organization of
public sector bodies. We might also look at which kinds of data standards shape public
sector data systems. For example, the UN COFOG (Classifications of Functions of
10 (accessed 10 March 2016).
Government) standard is widely used as a reference in order to facilitate comparability
between different national budgeting processes.11 This is particularly relevant when it comes
to looking at visualizations including multiple countriessuch as international development
or climate finance. The genesis of these data standards can also be studied through
analysis of (historical) document collections, the study of information systems (for example,
using approaches from software or platform studies), interviews and ethnographic studies.
2. From Data to Image
The second form of mediation in our heuristic framework is how visualizations mediate the
data sources they draw on into graphical form. This might including addressing questions
such as:
! How is the data mediated into graphical form?
! What kinds of graphical techniques, methods and technologies have been used?
! What are their affordances? How do they guide our attention towards different
aspects of the data?
! What design decisions have been taken? What are their consequences?
These concerns are prominent in both research and practical literature around data
visualizations. Edward Tufte talks of ‘graphical methods that organize and order the flow of
graphical information presented to the eye’ (Tufte, 2001, p. 154). He places a significant
premium on ‘graphical integrity’ of information visualizations such that they ‘defeat graphical
distortion and ambiguity’ (Tufte, 2001, p. 77). While this is one important way of looking at
how data is mediated into graphical form, there are many other important aspects to study.
Rather than just looking at accuracy, fidelity, and how graphics may be truthful or untruthful
about datawe can also step back and look at their affordancessuch as how they
11 (accessed 10 March 2016).
articulate structures and relationships or how they organize space, time, quantity and
categories in relation to the data.
In order to study these things we may learn a great deal from contemporary literature
about the creation of data visualizations, as well as classic literature on information graphics.
These can be used in order to understand the composition of data visualizations, or to
‘reverse engineer’ them, which helps us to develop a critical and reflexive approach to the
use of data visualization as a research device. Jacques Bertin’s 1967 Semiology of Graphics
proposes a series of ‘retinal variables’ (1983, p. 9) including size, value, texture, color,
orientation, shape as a starting point for analyzing and working with different types of
information graphics. This work provides an extensive and richly illustrated overview of how
different ‘components’ of information can be mapped onto different visual forms. In a similar
vein, Tufte’s The Visual Display of Quantitative Information contends that ‘data graphics
visually display measured quantities by means of the combined use of points, lines, a
coordinate system, numbers, symbols, words, shading and color’ (2001, p. 9).
While Bertin’s work is explicitly limited to print graphics which fit on a ‘sheet of white
paper’ (1983, p. 42) and many of Tufte’s seminal works also focus on print graphics, many of
the elements they discuss have been adopted and developed in relation to digital and
interactive data visualizations. Thus we may read these influential works alongside other
more recent works that cover digital tools and methods in order to understand how different
visual forms are implicated in the visualizations under studyincluding table graphics,
maps, timelines, sparklines, networks, graphs, flow diagrams, small multiples, motion charts,
bubble charts and treemaps. These different forms can also be combined to highlight
different aspects of the data. We may also look at the affordances of the software or the
platforms that were used to create data visualizations (see, for example, Wright, 2008;
Manovich, 2002, 2011, 2014). As well as desktop software applications, there is a growing
number of visualization tools which enable visualizations to be generated and embedded.
There is also a growing number of software libraries and components which are widely used
to translate data into different graphical forms.
How might we use these approaches to study our collection of data visualizations about
public money? We could look at the different graphical forms used in data visualizations to
organize attention around different aspects of public finances. For our collection, this could
include examining how different graphical elements are used in order to:
! Show a ‘bigger picture’ of breakdowns of totals into different categories;
! Put different figures into context;
! Show the geographical distribution of funds;
! Show trends or developments over time;
! Show breakdown of funds by sector or recipient;
! Show networks of financial flows;
! Compare different parts of the budgeting cycle (for example, commitments and
actual expenditure);
! Compare revenues, expenditures and debts;
! Show allocations per capita.
The formal characteristics of different visualizations in a collection can be studied with
reference to either a pre-defined vocabulary of elements or through an ‘open coding’ or
‘emergent coding’ process (see Strauss & Corbin, 1998). As similar visual elements can play
different roles in different contexts, it is crucial to note not only their presence or absence,
but their relations with other elements in the visualization as a whole. For example, compare
the use of bubbles in the following visualizations:
Figure 11.4: Total UK public spending (The Guardian);
2010-11 (accessed 10 March 2016).
Figure 11.5: Geographical distribution of international development spending (UNDP); (accessed 10 March 2016).
Figure 11.6: Health spending per person compared with income per person over time
(Gapminder World); (accessed 10 March 2016).
Figure 11.7: Spending by different government departments over time (Government of
Paraguay); (accessed 10
March 2016).
Figure 11.8: Network of Dutch public spending on IT services and software (Adriana
Homolova); (accessed 10 March 2016).
Figure 11.9: Comparing commitments and spending in Israeli budget (Budget Key); (accessed 10 March 2016).
With these examples we can see how the bubbles are arranged, scaled and colored in order
to draw out different characteristics of public financesfrom representing hierarchical
relationships in national budgets, to the locations of development funds, to health spending
per capita over time, to spending per department over time, to relationships between
recipients of public contracts, to the differences between commitments and spending. In
each case, the bubbles are used in different ways to represent different thingswith the
position, size and color having varying significance for each graphic. These different ways of
organizing visual phenomena thus articulate and emphasize different ways of organizing
knowledge about public finances.
As well as studying the characteristics of visualizations, their creators could be
interviewed regarding their techniques, methods, software tools and design choices. Where
software repositories are available these can also be analyzed in order to understand how
data sources are being mediated into graphicswhether for individual repositories or for
collections. We might, for example, study repositories associated with fiscal data
visualization projects on GitHub.12
3. From Image to Eye
The third and final form of mediation in our heuristic framework is how the image appears to
the eye and to the mind. As we saw in the last section, visualizations emphasize different
aspects of data through design choices, techniques and software which organize data into
graphical form. But these graphical forms also engender and depend on different socially,
culturally and historically contingent ways of seeing data. Hence we might ask:
! What kinds of visual cultures and practices are implicated or reflected in the data
visualization? Where do these come from?
! What forms of usage are inscribed in the visualization? Who are the publics of the
data visualization? How is it circulated, cited and shared?
Rather than seeing the visual forms as neutral instruments for making evidence visible
or as Tufte puts it, ‘instruments for reasoning about quantitative information’ (Tufte, 2001, p.
9)we can study their genealogies, aesthetics and epistemological affordances to situate
them in relation to other ideals, values and practices. For example, visualizations can be
read against the background of histories of science, technology and modernity which explore
the relationship between vision, knowledge and image making practicesfrom accounts of
occidental ‘ocularcentricism’ (see Jay, 1988) to the role of visual cultures in the development
of conceptions of objectivity (see Daston and Galison, 2010).
12 Bounegru and Gray are currently involved in developing tools and methods for working with metadata from GitHub as
part of other research projects.
There have been several recent works which make the case for drawing on
hermeneutical approaches from the humanities to enhance the study of data visualizations.
For example, in her book Graphesis Johanna Drucker advocates ‘critical study of visuality
from a humanistic perspective’ in order to ‘de-naturalize the increasingly familiar interface
that has become so habitual in daily use’ (Drucker, 2014, p. 9–10). She explores the
emergence of contemporary ‘visual epistemology’ with reference to a broad range of
developments in art, architecture, design, industry, philosophy and computer sciencefrom
the emergence of graphical design to interdisciplinary deliberations about visual abstraction
between artists and designers associated with the Bauhaus school in Weimar Germany. In
her Beautiful Data, Orit Halpern also similarly aims to ‘denaturalize and historically situate’
ideals and practices of data visualization (Halpern, 2015). She traces the genesis of what
she calls ‘communicative objectivity’ that has come to be associated with data visualizations
drawing on a different disciplinary constellation focusing on cybernetics, communication
science, behavioral science, engineering, management studies, urban planning and military
research. There is also a growing body of literature focusing on the aesthetics of data
visualization (see Manovich, 2002; Jevbratt, 2004; Lau and Vande Moere, 2007; Whitelaw,
2008; Sack, 2011; Cubitt, 2015) as well as on the development of different visual forms such
as the timeline (see Rosenberg and Grafton, 2013) or those associated with network
analysis (see Freeman, 2004). The narrative dimension of data visualizations can also be
studied (see Segel and Heer, 2010; Venturini et al., 2016).
How might these kinds of approaches be adopted to study specific data visualizations
such as our collection about public finances? We could study the aesthetics of these
visualizationsfor example, the clean, minimalistic style adorned with primary color palettes
and icons that has become so widely adopted in many contemporary information graphics.
Figure 11.10: Government spending over £25,000 (The Guardian);
beautiful (accessed 10 March 2016).
Figure 11.11: (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency); (accessed 10 March 2016).
This is similar to the aesthetic that is advocated by Tufte: championing efficiency and
parsimony, maximizing the ‘data-ink’ ratio and eliminating ‘chartjunk’. He proposes that ‘the
design of statistical graphics is a universal matter [] like mathematics’ and that insight into
the design of visualizations may be obtained through the study of ‘excellence in art,
architecture and prose’ (Tufte, 2001, p. 10). Peter Galison (1990) has previously studied the
links between architectural modernism and the universal aspirations of logic, mathematics
and philosophy in the first few decades of the twentieth century. Many of the fiscal data
visualizations in our collection look to share this aesthetic. Several of them incorporate icons
or pictograms reminiscent of those associated with the Isotype Institute of Marie and Otto
Neurath, which has exercised an important influence on the contemporary aesthetics of data
visualization (Zambrano and Engelhardt, 2008; Mayr and Schreder, 2014; Headrick, 2000;
Rayward, 2008).
Figure 11.12: Science spending in the UK (Scienceogram); (accessed 10 March 2016).
Figure 11.13: ‘Home and Factory Weaving in England’ (Neurath, 1939).
Genealogical study may help to enrich research about what has given rise to the contingent
forms that data visualizations may takeidentifying a range of different influences and
origins of different visual forms. Starting points may be provided through interviews with
designers as well as content analysis of relevant design materialswhich may be
complemented with historical texts and archival research.
We might also study the specific visual forms which are transposed to mediate public
money. Many visualizations are described and/or organized as dashboardsgiving users
an overview of multiple key indicators and trends over time in a single viewing pane, inviting
narratives of oversight, optimization, balance and control (see Tkacz, 2015).
Figure 11.14: City of Boston’s Open Budget Application; (accessed 10 March 2016).
As well as studying data visualizations as cultural forms from a humanistic perspective, we
can also trace their circulation, reception and how they are used and viewed by different
publics (see Kennedy et al., 2016). In addition to interviews and workshops, digital methods
could be utilized to extract and analyze traces from digital platforms and online spaces in
order to review the contexts in which visualizations are being used and shared (Rogers,
2013). For example, we could query for names or URLs of projects on social media, search
engine results, news media, or collections of documents. This may also help to chart the
particular publics and context of usage of the visualizationswhich can assist with their
study as social and cultural forms.
In this chapter we have proposed a heuristic framework that may be used to develop critical
reflexivity around the use of data visualization as an object of research or a communicative
or analytical device in research. We have illustrated this framework with reference to a
collection of data visualizations about public money, and suggested some methods and
approaches that could be used to study them.
Firstly we looked at the study of data sources, focusing on research approaches to
examine how they selectively articulate and mediate different aspects of the world
including how to identify sources, tracing how they have been transformed and studying data
infrastructures. Secondly we looked at ways to study how the data sources are mediated
into graphical formincluding through the analysis of their visual properties, software and
design choices. Thirdly and finally, we looked at ways of studying graphical forms as
socially, culturally and historically contingent forms engendering different ways of seeing
including by tracing their diverse influences, and by analyzing their circulation and contexts
of usage.
We hope that the study of these three forms of mediation through some of the
approaches that we have discussed in this chapter may provide a useful starting point for
researchers who wish to use data visualization as a research object or device. As data
visualizations become more and more central, prominent and familiar as ways of knowing
and organizing phenomena, we think it becomes imperative to develop a richer
understanding of the ways of seeing and ways of knowing that they engender. Just as
Berger’s Ways of Seeing helped to advance broader awareness of the critical study of
images and visual culture, so we hope that further research in this area will advance literacy
around ways of seeing data and ways of seeing with and through data visualizations. As
visualization tools and practices become more and more ubiquitous, this might include not
only the development of a critical hermeneutics, but also new kinds of self-reflexive praxis
for the creation and reconfiguration of visualizations which are attentive to the forms of
mediation that we have outlined. Experimentation in this direction might be informed by calls
for non-reductive visualization (Manovich, 2002), humanistic interfaces (Drucker, 2014),
feminist data visualization (D’Ignazio, 2015), inventive methods (Lury and Wakeford, 2012),
rethinking dashboards (Tkacz, 2015), and critical analytics (Rogers, 2015).
Agre, P. E. (1997) Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to
Reform AI. In G. C. Bowker, S. Star, L. Gasser et al. (Eds.), Social Science,
Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide (Mahwah:
Lawrence Erlbaum), pp. 13158.
Akrich, M. (1992) The De-Scription of Technical Objects. In W. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.),
Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 20524.
Berger, J. (1972) Ways of Seeing (London: Penguin).
Berkowitz, D. (2009) Reporters and Their Sources. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch
(Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (New York: Routledge), pp. 10215.
Bertin, J. (1983) Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. (Madison: University of
Wisconsin Press).
Bowker, G., and Star, S. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Cairo, A. (2012) The Functional Art: An Introduction to Information Graphics and
Visualization (Berkeley: New Riders).
Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J., and Schneiderman, B. (Eds.). (1999) Readings in Information
Visualization: Using Vision to Think (San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann).
Cleveland, W. S. (1993) Visualizing Data (Murray Hill: Hobart Press).
Cleveland, W. S. (1994) The Elements of Graphing Data (Murray Hill: Hobart Press).
Cottle, S. (2003). News, Public Relations and Power: Mapping the Field. In S. Cottle (ed.),
News, Public relations and Power (London: Sage), pp. 3–24.
Cubitt, S. (2015) Data Visualization and the Subject of Political Aesthetics. In D. Berry and
M. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation And Design (London:
Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 17990.
D’Ignazio, C. (2015) What Would Feminist Data Visualization Look Like? MIT Center for
Civic Media 20 December: (accessed
10 March 2016).
Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2010) Objectivity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Drucker, J. (2014) Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production (Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press).
Espeland, W. N. and Stevens, M. L. (2008) A Sociology of Quantification. European Journal
of Sociology 49(3): 40136.
Espeland, W. N. and Sauder, M. L. (2007) Rankings And Reactivity: How Public Measures
Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1–40.
Few, S. (2009) Now You See It: Simple Visualization Techniques for Quantitative Analysis
(Oakland: Analytics Press).
Few, S. (2012) Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten. 2nd ed
(Burlingame: Analytics Press).
Few, S. (2013) Information Dashboard Design: Displaying Data for At-a-Glance Monitoring
(Burlingame: Analytics Press).
Few, S. (2014) Data Visualization for Human Perception. In M. Soegaard and R. Dam
(Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd Ed. (Aarhus: The
Interaction Design Foundation), available at: https://www.interaction-
ed/data-visualization-for-human-perception (accessed 20 March 2016).
Freeman, L. C. (2004) The Development of Social Network Analysis (Vancouver:
Galison, P. (1990) Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modernism. Critical
Inquiry 16(4): 70952.
Gerlitz, C and Lury, C. (2014) Social Media and Self-Evaluating Assemblages: On Numbers,
Orderings and Values. Distinktion 15(2): 17488.
Gray, J. (2015a) Open Budget Data: Mapping the Landscape. Available at: (accessed 15 March
Gray, J. (2015b) Examples of Fiscal Data Visualisations. figshare. Available at:
(accessed 15 March 2016).
Gray, J. and Davies, T. (2015) Fighting Phantom Firms in the UK: From Opening Up
Datasets to Reshaping Data Infrastructures? Working paper presented at the Open
Data Research Symposium at the 3rd International Open Government Data
Conference (Ottawa). Available at: (accessed 10 March
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T. et al. (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and
Law and Order (London: Macmillan).
Halpern, O. (2015) Beautiful Data: A History of Vision and Reason Since 1945 (Durham:
Duke University Press).
Headrick, D. R. (2000) When Information Came of Age: Technologies of Knowledge in the
Age of Reason and Revolution, 1700-1850 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Heller, S. and Landers, R. (2014) Raw Data: Infographic Designers’ Sketchbooks (London:
Thames and Hudson).
Jay, M. (1988). The Rise of Hermeneutics and the Crisis of Ocularcentrism. Poetics Today
9(2): 30726.
Jevbratt, L. (2004) The Prospect of the Sublime in Data Visualizations. `
Katz, J. (2012) Designing Information: Human Factors and Common Sense in Information
Design (Hoboken: Wiley).
Kennedy, H., Hill, L., Aiello, G. et al. (2016) The Work that Visualisation Conventions Do.
Information, Communication & Society 19(6): 71535.
Krum, R. (2013) Cool Infographics: Effective Communication with Data Visualization and
Design (Indianapolis: Wiley).
Lau, A. and Vande Moere, A. (2007) Towards a Model of Information Aesthetics in
Information Visualization. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference
Information Visualization (Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society), pp. 8792.
Law, J. and Ruppert, E. (2013) The Social Life of Methods: Devices. Journal of Cultural
Economy 6(3): 22940.
Lima, M. (2011) Visual Complexity: Mapping Patterns of Information (New York: Princeton
Architectural Press).
Lury, C. and Wakeford, N. (Eds.) (2012) Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social
(London: Routledge).
Manning, P. (2001) News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction (London: Sage).
Manovich, L. (2002). Data Visualisation as New Abstraction and Anti-sublime. In B. Hawk, D.
Rieder and O. Oviedo (Eds.), Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools, Electronic
Mediations (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 3–9.
Manovich, L. (2011) What is Visualisation? Visual Studies 26(1): 3649.
Manovich, L. (2014) Visualization Methods for Media Studies. In C. Vernallis, A. Herzog and
J. Richardson (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Sound and Image in Digital Media
(Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 25378.
Marres, N. and Gerlitz, C. (2015) Interface Methods: Renegotiating Relations Between
Digital Social Research, STS and Sociology. The Sociological Review 64(1): 2146.
Mayr, E. and Schreder, G. (2014) Isotype Visualizations. A Chance for Participation & Civic
Education. JeDEMeJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 6(2), 13650.
McCandless, D. (2012) Information is Beautiful (New York: Collins).
McCandless, D. (2014) Knowledge is Beautiful (New York: Collins).
McCosker, A. and Wilken, R. (2014) Rethinking ‘Big Data’ as Cisual Knowledge: The
Sublime and the Diagrammatic in Data Visualisation. Visual Studies 29(2): 15564
McLuhan, M. (1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man (Toronto:
University of Toronto Press).
Meirelles, I. (2013) Design for Information: An Introduction to the Histories, Theories, and
Best Practices Behind Effective Information Visualizations. Beverly, MA: Rockport
Munzner, T. (2014) Visualization Analysis and Design (Boca Raton: CRC Press).
Murray, S. (2013) Interactive Data Visualization for the Web (Sebastopol: O’Reilly).
Neurath, O. (1939) Modern Man in the Making (New York: Knopf).
Playfair, W. (1801) The Commercial and Political Atlas, Representing, by Means of Stained
Copper-Plates, the Progress of the Commerce, Revenues, Expenditure, and Debt of
England during the Whole of the Eighteenth Century. 3rd ed (London: Wallis).
Rayward, W. B. (Ed.). (2008) European Modernism and the Information Society: Informing
the Present, Understanding the Past (Aldershot: Ashgate).
Rendgen, S. (2012) Information Graphics (Köln: Taschen).
Rendgen, S. (2014) Understanding the World: The Atlas of Infographics (Köln: Taschen).
Rieder, B. and Röhle, T. (2012) Digital Methods: Five Challenges. In D. M. Berry (Ed.),
Understanding Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 6784.
Rogers, R. (2013) Digital Methods (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Rogers, R. (2015) From Dashboards to Critical Analytics. Paper presented at Data Power
Conference (University of Sheffield).
Rosenberg, D. and Grafton, A. (2013) Cartographies of Time: A History of the Timeline (New
York: Princeton Architectural Press).
Ruppert, E. (2015) Doing the Transparent State: Open Government Data as Performance
Indicators. In: R. Rottenburg, S. E. Merry, S.-J. Parkand and J. Mugler (Eds.), A
World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification.
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–18.
Ruppert, E., Law, J. and Savage, M. (2013) Reassembling Social Science Methods: The
Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society 30(4): 2246.
Sack, W. (2011) Aesthetics of Information Visualization. In M. Lovejoy, C. Paul and V.
Vesna (Eds.), Context Providers: Conditions of Meaning in Media Arts (Bristol:
Intellect), pp. 12350)..
Schoffelen, J., Claes, S., Huybrechts, L. et al. (2015) Visualising Things. Perspectives on
How to Make Things Public Through Cisualisation. CoDesign 11(34): 17992.
Segel, E. and Heer, J. (2010) Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data. IEEE
Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16(6): 113948.
Spence, R. (2014) Information Visualization: An Introduction (New York: Springer).
Star, S. (1999) The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43(3): 377
Star, S. and Ruhleder, K. (1996) Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and
Access for Large Information Spaces. Information Systems Research 7(1): 11134.
Steele, J. and Iliinsky, N. (Eds.) (2010) Beautiful Visualization: Looking at Data through the
Eyes of Experts (Sebastopol: O’Reilly).
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and
Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed (London: Sage).
Tactical Technology Collective (2014) Visualising Information for Advocacy.
Tkacz, N. (2015) Connection Perfected: What the Dashboard Reveals. Keynote Address at
Digital Methods Winter School 2015 (University of Amsterdam).
Tufte, E. R. (1990) Envisioning Information (Cheshire: Graphics Press).
Tufte, E. R. (1997a) Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative
(Cheshire: Graphics Press).
Tufte, E. R. (1997b) Visual and Statistical Thinking: Displays of Evidence for Making
Decisions (Cheshire: Graphics Press).
Tufte, E. R. (2001) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. 2nd ed (Cheshire:
Graphics Press).
Tukey, J. (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis (Reading: Addison-Wesley).
Venturini, T., Bounegru, L., Jacomy, M. and Gray, J. (forthcoming) How to Tell Stories with
Networks: Exploring the Narrative Affordances of Network Graphs with the Iliad. In
M. T. Schaefer and K. van Es (Eds.), The Datafied Society: Social Research in the
Age of Big Data (Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press).
Whitelaw, M. (2008) Art Against Information: Case Studies in Data Practice. Fibreculture 11:
data-practice/ (accessed 10 March 2016).
Wong, D. M. (2013) The Wall Street Journal Guide to Information Graphics: The Dos and
Don’ts of Presenting Data, Facts, and Figures (New York: Norton).
Wright, R. (2008) Data Visualization. In M. Fuller (ed.), Software Studies: A Lexicon.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 7887.
Yau, N. (2011) Visualize This: The FlowingData Guide to Design, Visualization, and
Statistics (Indianapolis: Wiley).
Yau, N. (2013) Data Points: Visualization That Means Something (Indianapolis: Wiley).
Zambrano, R. N. and Engelhardt, Y. (2008) Diagrams for the Masses: Raising Public
AwarenessFrom Neurath to Gapminder and Google Earth. In G. Stapleton, J.
Howse and J. Lee (Eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Berlin:
Springer), pp. 28292.
... The non-designerly approach of many of the Theory of Change existing models is characterized by a linear sequence of boxes (e.g., actions, outputs, outcomes) and arrows connecting them, representing the expected causal connections between these events (Davies, 2018). Similarly to some data visualization techniques, such sequential representations suggest narratives of optimization, balance, and control (Gray et al., 2016). This spirit does not necessarily match neither the experimental, flexible, and open nature of design nor its participatory attributes. ...
Full-text available
Theory of Change was created as a logic planning model to explore and represent a potential change in a way that reflects a complex and systemic understanding of development. Even though it is a familiar tool in the context of community initiatives and philanthropic projects, Theory of Change is under‐applied in design as a problem‐solving practice and underexplored within design research. Design projects that are looking for more comprehensive ways of negotiating change can greatly benefit from it to inform a deep understanding of the dynamics of change. This paper focuses on how a designerly approach to Theory of Change can support participatory visual mapping, thus creating some enabling conditions towards transformation in cities, namely: facilitating more granular communication, suggesting a multifaceted and systemic perspective, helping to navigate complexity by creating shared mental models among stakeholders, fostering thinking through different temporalities, and boosting creativity. The paper will examine a case of an urban transformation project that involves six European cities under regeneration.
... Aunque no lo plantean directamente, los estudios sobre la ansiedad matemática y la femtech están relacionados también con el tema más amplio de la alfabetización de datos (en inglés, data literacy), o el acceso a los datos, habilidades, instrumentos y oportunidades para tratar y analizar con datos, que es la base de la agencia y el empoderamiento de datos. Estudios anteriores (Gray et al., 2016;Gutiérrez, 2019;Kõuts-Klemm, 2019, entre otros) señalan que la forma en la que actúan los algoritmos detrás de las plataformas es tan compleja y oscura que se requieren nuevas habilidades, recursos y situaciones que fomenten dicha alfabetización de datos. El problema es que, aunque existen muchas asimetrías entre las mismas mujeres, generadas por las diferencias de clase y raza, estas tienen, en general, menos acceso a la tecnología (Taylor, 2018) y son minoría en el sector tecnológico (Pickett, 2018;West et al., 2019). ...
Full-text available
Mujeres, datos y poder. Una mirada al interior de la economía de las plataformas.
... Such approaches may encourage network practitioners to attend to how their practices are mediated through critical encounters with relational data and the digital technologies and infrastructures that facilitate and frame their creation, analysis, and visual representation (cf. Gray et al., 2016;van Geenen and Wieringa, 2020). ...
Full-text available
Networks have risen to prominence as intellectual technologies and graphical representations, not only in science, but also in journalism, activism, policy, and online visual cultures. Inspired by approaches taking trouble as occasion to (re)consider and reflect on otherwise implicit knowledge practices, in this article we explore how problems with network practices can be taken as invitations to attend to the diverse settings and situations in which network graphs and maps are created and used in society. In doing so, we draw on cases from our research, engagement and teaching activities involving making networks, making sense of networks, making networks public, and making network tools. As a contribution to “critical data practice,” we conclude with some approaches for slowing down and caring for network practices and their associated troubles to elicit a richer picture of what is involved in making networks work as well as reconsidering their role in collective forms of inquiry.
... Although there is a long tradition of exploring public finances with information graphics (Gray, et al., 2016), it appears that public spending has featured more prominently in such projects than taxation or revenue (Gray, 2015). Offshore finance has been covered by journalistic media reporting specific cases of scandals that represent a portion of the phenomenon. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), or controlling investments that cross national borders, is in many respects the backbone of globalization. However, a considerable part of it is composed of "paper" shell companies used for tax avoidance and other purposes. While it is possible to reconstruct chains of FDI positions, it is difficult to raise public awareness of the full scale and shape of the phenomenon, in terms of not only the countries or amounts of money involved, but also the high levels of uncertainty surrounding estimates of these figures. In this paper we introduce the Atlas of Offshore, a visual exploratory tool meant to enable domain experts and broader publics to explore offshore finance, with a focus on clearly showing the complex webs of relationships between countries involved. Starting from a variation of the "Sankey Diagram", we propose a solution aimed at representing the topology of the network, the estimated size of investments, and the uncertainty surrounding these estimates. A prototype of the tool has been developed, testing the visual model with data describing the network of offshore investments for nine countries, enabling domain experts and others to obtain a new perspective on this issue.
... 8 This is also in adherence to the idea of promoting visualization literacy. 73,74 The value of an integrated tool. Through practicing on a developed prototype, three main advantages can be mentioned. ...
Full-text available
To accommodate the demands of a data-driven society, we have expanded our ability to collect and store data, develop sophisticated algorithms, and generate elaborated visual representations of the data analysis process outcomes. However, data preprocessing, as the activity of transforming the raw data into an appropriate format for subsequent analysis, is still a challenging part of this process. Although we can find studies that address the use of visualization techniques to support the activities in the scope of preprocessing, the current Visual Analytics processes do not consider preprocessing an equally important phase in their processes. Hence, with this paper, we aim to contribute to the discussion of how we can incorporate the preprocessing as a prominent phase in the Visual Analytics process and promote better alternatives to assist the data analysts during the preprocessing activities. To achieve that, we are introducing the Preprocessing Profiling Approach for Visual Analytics (PrAVA), a conceptual Visual Analytics process that includes Preprocessing Profiling as a new phase. It also contemplates a set of guidelines to be considered by new solutions adopting PrAVA. Moreover, we analyze its applicability through use case scenarios that show resourceful methods for data understanding and evaluation of the preprocessing impacts. As a final contribution, we indicate a list of research opportunities in the scope of preprocessing combined with visualization and Visual Analytics to stimulate a shift to visual preprocessing.
Using ethnographic vignettes from the development of simulations for architectural design and spatial planning in university contexts, this article discusses how the material, embodied, and tacit dimensions of developing and doing research with simulations can be opened up to analysis. We ask how (in)visibility comes to matter in simulations and how it is made and unmade in different situations. In particular, we explore how specific enactments of the things that are simulated and the practices involved in producing and handling them are rendered (in)visible through the simulation process. We argue that focusing on the politics of (in)visibility in making simulations can render power relations underpinning architectural and spatial planning practices more apparent.
The authors present the results of studying migration processes as one of the factors that determine the transformation of the regional social space. Applying migration indicators to assessing prospective spatial changes presupposes a multivariate analysis of developing complex heterogeneous systems. The version of applying problem-oriented visualization tools presented by the authors significantly expands the possibilities of such an analysis. Assessment, systematization and subsequent classification of migration characteristics are considered within the framework of a multi-stage graphical digital analysis procedure. The problems of migration dynamics characterize a number of problems of the incipient deformation of social space. The main provisions and results of the study are presented as exemplified by the five largest urban areas of the Chelyabinsk region. The key contradictions generated by the processes of regional migration are presented for various urban areas of one of the leading industrial regions of the Urals. These are contradictions: dynamics of population inflow — outflow; the ratio of the balance of migration and migration flows, etc. The results of the study make it possible to proceed to more complex models of spatial reconstruction and sustainable development of territories. Considering such models lays the groundwork for passing on to a controlled transformation in the spatial development of territories and reducing the signs of social space deformation.
Full-text available
Data visualization for alternative narratives is a powerful adversarial tool that seeks to inquire about the existing conditions of conflicts. Nowadays, data visualization is widely used in activist communication to offer data-driven counternarratives to those with dominant power. However, a study of 64 cases shows that most visualizations are far from following the open-source ethos that data activism advocates. If visualizations for alternative narratives do not open up their processes and communicate how the meaning of data is shaped and translated visually, they risk turning into black-box devices that crystallize biased representations of conflict rather than investigating them. This paper presents a data design framework for visualizations used in alternative narratives. It is presented as a methodological tool that encourages actionable data practices that promote a more critical and reflective data culture. The framework is structured in two ways of approaching the process of working with data: from the parts of the process and from the process as a whole. The first approach presents four lenses intended to materialize aspects of the process of working with and making sense of data: Open/close, Composition, Zoom, and Sanitization. The second approach proposes a self-hacking operation of disclosing the production process of the visualizations. This paper argues that visualizations for alternative narratives ought to be open artifacts that promote the democratization of re-interpretation and critical data by disclosing the design decisions that were made on the dataset, as well as its visual, and interactive representation.
Through always more innovative IT applications, the construction industry is moving towards the digitalization of the building process, from digital design to automated manufacturing and smart buildings. Big data are now able to take us into an augmented reality—the virtual sibling of the real one—where buildings become cognitive and predictive, capable to actively interact with people. Towards this direction, the capability to store and organize building information at any level of its lifecycle is essential, especially when the multi-criteria evaluation of buildings’ behavior is required. Within this framework, the chapter introduces the review of the standards and best practices, mainly focusing on BIM as the driven method for the management of the entire building process. Hence, the methodology to develop a new assessment tool is presented, according to the investigation of the current platforms for the evaluation of buildings’ performances, and the pursued methods to define new additional shared parameters, specifically customized for the application to retrofit design solutions with timber-based construction systems.
Today we are witnessing an increased use of data visualization in society. Across domains such as work, education and the news, various forms of graphs, charts and maps are used to explain, convince and tell stories. In an era in which more and more data are produced and circulated digitally, and digital tools make visualization production increasingly accessible, it is important to study the conditions under which such visual texts are generated, disseminated and thought to be of societal benefit. This book is a contribution to the multi-disciplined and multi-faceted conversation concerning the forms, uses and roles of data visualization in society. Do data visualizations do 'good' or 'bad'? Do they promote understanding and engagement, or do they do ideological work, privileging certain views of the world over others? The contributions in the book engage with these core questions from a range of disciplinary perspectives.
Full-text available
In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such “methods of the medium” as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By “thinking along” with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine such topics as the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).
Full-text available
In the 1920s, Otto Neurath proposed a method for pictorial statistics called “Isotype”. The Isotype pictorial statistics were intended to educate the broad public and enable them to participate in society. This method is reviewed with respect to its relevance and potential for information visualization nowadays. Though some aspects are outdated, the basic approach has still potential for information visualization and civic education. Possible new media applications are presented and their impact for civic education and participation is discussed.
A cultural field guide to software: artists, computer scientists, designers, cultural theorists, programmers, and others define a new field of study and practice. This collection of short expository, critical, and speculative texts offers a field guide to the cultural, political, social, and aesthetic impact of software. Computing and digital media are essential to the way we work and live, and much has been said about their influence. But the very material of software has often been left invisible. In Software Studies, computer scientists, artists, designers, cultural theorists, programmers, and others from a range of disciplines each take on a key topic in the understanding of software and the work that surrounds it. These include algorithms; logical structures; ways of thinking and doing that leak out of the domain of logic and into everyday life; the value and aesthetic judgments built into computing; programming's own subcultures; and the tightly formulated building blocks that work to make, name, multiply, control, and interweave reality. The growing importance of software requires a new kind of cultural theory that can understand the politics of pixels or the poetry of a loop and engage in the microanalysis of everyday digital objects. The contributors to Software Studies are both literate in computing (and involved in some way in the production of software) and active in making and theorizing culture. Software Studies offers not only studies of software but proposes an agenda for a discipline that sees software as an object of study from new perspectives. ContributorsAlison Adam, Wilfried Hou Je Bek, Morten Breinbjerg, Ted Byfield, Wendy Hui Kyong Chun, Geoff Cox, Florian Cramer, Cecile Crutzen, Marco Deseriis, Ron Eglash, Matthew Fuller, Andrew Goffey, Steve Goodman, Olga Goriunova, Graham Harwood, Friedrich Kittler, Erna Kotkamp, Joasia Krysa, Adrian Mackenzie, Lev Manovich, Michael Mateas, Nick Montfort, Michael Murtaugh, Jussi Parikka, Søren Pold, Derek Robinson, Warren Sack, Grzesiek Sedek, Alexei Shulgin, Matti Tedre, Adrian Ward, Richard Wright, Simon Yuill
Although the Information Age is often described as a new era, a cultural leap springing directly from the invention of modern computers, it is simply the latest step in a long cultural process. Its conceptual roots stretch back to the profound changes that occurred during the Age of Reason and Revolution. When Information Came of Age argues that the key to the present era lies in understanding the systems developed in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries to gather, store, transform, display, and communicate information. The book provides a concise and readable survey of the many conceptual developments between 1700 and 1850 and draws connections to leading technologies of today. It documents three breakthroughs in information systems that date to the period: the classification and nomenclature of Linnaeus, the chemical system devised by Lavoisier, and the metric system. It shows how eighteenth-century political arithmeticians and demographers pioneered statistics and graphs as a means for presenting data succinctly and visually. It describes the transformation of cartography from art to science as it incorporated new methods for determining longitude at sea and new data on the measure the arc of the meridian on land. Finally, it looks at the early steps in codifying and transmitting information, including the development of dictionaries, the invention of semaphore telegraphs and naval flag signaling, and the conceptual changes in the use and purpose of postal services. When Information Came of Age shows that like the roots of democracy and industrialization, the foundations of the Information Age were built in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century.