A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Brain Imaging and Behavior
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Considering total intracranial volume and other nuisance
variables in brain voxel based morphometry in idiopathic PD
Samuel Crowley
1
&Haiqing Huang
2
&Jared Tanner
1
&Qing Zhao
2
&Nadine A. Schwab
1
&
Loren Hizel
1
&Daniel Ramon
1
&Babette Brumback
3
&Mingzhou Ding
2
&
Catherine C. Price
1,4
#Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017
Abstract Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) studies of
Parkinson’s disease (PD), have yielded mixed results, possibly
due to several studies not accounting for common nuisance
variables (age, sex, and total intracranial volume [TICV]).
TICV is particularly important because there is evidence for
larger TICV in PD. We explored the influence of these covari-
ates on VBM by 1) comparing PD patients and controls before
adding covariates, after adding age and sex, and after adding
age, sex and TICV, and 2) by comparing controls split into large
and small TICV before and after controlling for TICV, with age
and sex accounted for in both analyses. Experiment 1 consisted
of 40 PD participants and 40 controls. Experiment 2 consisted of
88 controls median split by TICV. All participants completed an
MRIona3Tscanner.TICVwascalculatedasgray+white+
CSF from Freesurfer. VBM was performed on T1 images using
an optimized VBM protocol. Volume differences were assessed
using a voxel-wise GLM analysis. Clusters were considered
significant at >10 voxels and p< .05 corrected for familywise
error. Before controlling for covariates, PD showed reduced GM
in temporal, occipital, and cerebellar regions. Controlling for age
and sex did not affect the pattern of significance. Controlling for
TICV reduced the size of the significant region although it still
contained portions of bilateral temporal lobes, occipital lobes
and cerebellum. The large TICV group showed reduced volume
in temporal, parietal, and cerebellar areas. None of these differ-
ences survived controlling for TICV. This demonstrates that
TICV influences VBM results independently from other factors.
Controlling for TICV in VBM studies is recommended.
Keywords Voxel-based morphometry .VBM .Parkinson’s
disease .Structural MRI .Total intracranial volume .TICV .
TIV
Introduction
Structural MRI is a powerful tool for assessing brain volume
differences, particularly in the context of neurodegenerative
disease such as Parkinson’s disease (PD). It offers insight into
neuroanatomical differences in PD and informs how different
presentations of PD (for example, PD with and without de-
mentia) may differ in terms of whole brain or regional vol-
umes. There are several methods for determining structural or
volumetric brain differences. One popular method is voxel-
based morphomety (VBM), commonly used because it does
not rely on pre-determined brain structures.
VBM has been employed in several studies of PD with
mixed results ranging from widespread volumetric declines
in PD to no differences between individuals with PD and
demographically matched peers (Table 1). Several researchers
have reported regional volumetric decreases in temporal, pa-
rietal, and occipital areas in idiopathic PD relative to peers. In
The original version of this article was revised: QingZhao was incorrectly
spelled as Qing Zho.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article
(doi:10.1007/s11682-016-9656-9) contains supplementary material,
which is available to authorized users.
*Catherine C. Price
cep23@phhp.ufl.edu
1
Department of Clinical andHealth Psychology, University of Florida,
1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, 1275
Center Drive, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
3
Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry
Road, 5th Floor CTRB, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
4
Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, 101 S. Newell
Drive, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
DOI 10.1007/s11682-016-9656-9
Published online: 9 January 2017
Brain Imaging and Behavior (2018) 12:1–12
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.