Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing
2014, 5(8), 909-912
© 2014 Indian Association of Health,
Research and Welfare
Effects of dynamic meditation on anxiety
Naved Iqbal, Archana Singh, Sheeema Aleem and Samina Bano
Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Although traditional meditation has been found to be effective in improving physical and mental health of
subjects, but there was a paucity of research of the effect of active or dynamic meditation on these variables.
Therefore, the present study was aimed at studying the effect of dynamic meditation on anxiety of the subjects.
Total sample of the present study comprised of 60 subjects, 30 each in experimental and control group. Subjects
in the experimental group were given 21 days training in dynamic meditation. Anxiety of the experimental and
control group subjects was measured in pre and post condition with the help of Sinha anxiety scale. Obtained data
were analyzed with the help of analysis of covariance. In post condition, an experimental group scored better than
the control group on total anxiety. An effect size of dynamic meditation on anxiety was moderate.
Keywords: control group, dynamic meditation, experimental group, mental health
Meditation is a holistic discipline by which the practitioner attempts
to get beyond the reflexive, “thinking” mind into a deeper state
of relaxation or awareness. According to Smith (1975), the term
meditation refers to “a family of mental exercises that generally
involve calmly limiting thought and attention.” Shapiro (1982)
defines meditation as “a family of techniques which has in common
a conscious attempt to focus attention in a nonanalytical way and
an attempt not to dwell on discursive, rumination thought.” Such
exercises vary widely and can involve sitting still and counting
breath, attending to a repeated thought, or focusing on virtually any
simple external or internal stimulus.
The predominant meditation practices in much of Asia, from
Tibet to Japan, derive from Indian knowledge and tradition. But as
it reached China, Japan, Tibet, and Southeastern Asian countries,
each region added their own interpretations and developed their
own unique way of practicing meditation methods, as in China
where Buddhism and Taoism together yielded Zen (Wilber, 1998).
Meditation was spread to Western Society thousands of years after
it was adopted in the East. It finally started to gain popularity in
the West in the mid-20th century. In the 1960s and 1970s, many
professors and researchers began testing the effects of meditation
and learned about its multitude of benefits.
One common misconception is that all meditation procedures
are more or less “the same.” But this is simply incorrect, for
major meditation procedures often differ in an important way
(Jonathan, 2006). Different meditation traditions also often have
very different goals, ranging from physical health and mental well-
being to harmony with nature, higher states of consciousness, and
experience of God.
Broadly, all the meditation techniques can be classified into
two basic approaches: Concentrative meditation and mindfulness
meditation (Goleman, 1996).
In concentrative meditation, the attention is focused on the breath,
an image, or sound (mantra), in order to still the mind and allow a
greater awareness and clarity to emerge.
Mindfulness meditation involves expansion of the attention
or awareness to become aware of the ongoing sensation
and feeling, images, thoughts sounds smells, and so forth
without becoming involved in thinking about them (Kutz et al.,
Apart from these broad categories, there are many other
meditation techniques that do not fit in above categories but they
exist with the same goal of attaining a state of mind achieved during
meditation. These meditation techniques that do not assume a fixed
posture comes under active meditation.
Active/dynamic meditation refers to any meditation technique
which does not have one’s body assuming a static posture. Although
they are many, dynamic meditation introduced by Osho is one of
the most popular active mediation techniques. He said that if people
are repressed, psychologically are carrying a lot of burdens, then
they need catharsis. Hence, dynamic meditation is just to help them
clean the place (Osho, 2003).
Osho said he employed Western psychotherapy as a means of
preparing for meditation - A way to become aware of one’s mental
and emotional hang-ups-and also introduced his own “active
meditation” techniques, characterized by alternating stages of
physical activity and silence.
Dynamic meditation lasts 1 h and is in five stages. It can be done
alone, and will be even more powerful if it is done with others. It is
an individual experience so you should remain oblivious of others
around you and keep your eyes closed throughout, preferably using
a blindfold. It is best to have an empty stomach and wear loose,
First stage: 10 min
Breathe chaotically through the nose, concentrating always on
exhalation. The body will take care of the inhalation. The breath
should move deeply into the lungs. Be as fast as you can in your
breathing, making sure the breathing stays deep. Do this as fast and
as hard as you possibly can – And then a little harder, until you
literally become the breathing. Use your natural body movements
to help you to build up your energy. Feel it building up, but do not
let go during the first stage.
Correspondence should be sent to Prof. Naved Iqbal
Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia,
New Delhi – 110 025, India. Email: email@example.com
910 NAVED ET AL/EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC MEDITATION ON ANXIETY
Second stage: 10 min
Explode! Express everything that needs to be thrown out. Go
totally mad. Scream, shout, cry, jump, shake, dance, sing, laugh;
throw yourself around. Hold nothing back; keep your whole body
moving. A little acting often helps to get you started. Never allow
your mind to interfere with what is happening. Be a total, be whole
Third stage: 10 min
With raised arms, jump up and down shouting the mantra, “Hoo!
Hoo! Hoo!” as deeply as possible. Each time you land, on the flats
of your feet, let the sound hammer deep. Give all you have; exhaust
Fourth stage: 15 min
Stop! Freeze wherever you are, in whatever position you find
yourself. Do not arrange the body in any way. A cough, a movement-
anything will dissipate the energy flow, and the effort will be lost.
Be a witness to everything that is happening to you.
Fifth stage: 15 min
Celebrate through dance, expressing your gratitude toward the
whole. Carry your happiness with you throughout the day.
Dynamic meditation provides the mediator an opportunity
to catharsis and purify his mind and body which is according to
Osho is essential to gain the meditative state of mind. Thus, this
purification of mind and body helps the individual to wash out his
mind from anxiety.
Anxiety is a feeling of fear, worry, and uneasiness, usually
generalized and unfocused as an overreaction to a situation that is
only subjectively seen as menacing (Bouras & Holt, 2007). It is
often accompanied by muscular tension, restlessness, fatigue, and
problems in concentration. Anxiety can be appropriate, but when it
is too much and continues too long, the individual may suffer from
an anxiety disorder (Bouras & Holt, 2007). Anxiety is not the same
as fear, which is a response to a real or perceived immediate threat,
whereas anxiety is the expectation of future threat (American
Psychiatric Association, 2013).
Anxiety is normal human response to stress. A stressor is any
external or internal factor or pressure, which is brought to bear
upon the individual. There are many ways in which people describe
anxious feelings, not always recognizing that these feelings are
associated with anxiety.
Traditional meditation has been found to be effective in
reducing stress and enhancing well-being (Carmody & Baer, 2008;
Jain et al., 2007), controlling addiction (Marlatt & Chawla, 2007;
Simpson et al., 2007), controlling aggression (Singh et al., 2007),
controlling sucidality and depression (Williams et al., 2006), and
other psychiatric problems (Dalton & Beach, 2006).
These studies were based on yoga and Buddhist meditation.
But there is a paucity of research on various dynamic or active
forms of meditation. Present researcher could find only one
study conducted by Vyas (2007) on dynamic meditation. As
noted by researchers, different procedures of meditation might
well be expected to produce different results with regard to
different variables and thus ought to be evaluated individually
In view of the above, the present investigation was planned to
study the effect of dynamic meditation on anxiety.
Participant and design
The sample of the study comprised of 60 subjects of both
sexes, within age group of 18-55. There were 30 subjects in the
experimental group and 30 in the control group. The experimental
group was contacted from Osho Dhyandeep Kendra, Bareilly,
UP region (India) and control group matched with important
characteristics with the experimental group collected from
different localities of Bareilly city. The mean age of experimental
group subjects was 35.46, and the mean age of control group
subjects was 31.26. There were 11 male and 19 female subjects
in the experimental group and 12 male and 18 female subjects
in the control group. In the experimental group, the number of
undergraduate, graduate, post graduate subjects were 3, 20, and 7,
respectively. In the control group, the number of undergraduate,
graduate, post graduate subjects were 6, 11, and 13, respectively.
Subjects who had serious physical or psychological problems were
excluded from the study.
The present study was a pre-test - post-test control group design.
Anxiety was measured by anxiety scale by Sinha and Sinha (1995).
This scale contains 90 items. It has two response categories, “yes”
and “no.” “Yes” response is indicative of anxiety and is given “1”
marks whereas ‘no’ response is not given any marks. Reliability
coefficient of the test was found to be 0.92.
Reliability (internal consistency) was calculated by applying
Cronbach’s alpha test on the score of the present study. Overall
alpha is 0.96 in pre experimental assessment and 0.95 in post
experimental condition, which is very high and indicates strong
internal consistency among the test items (Table 1).
Subjects were contacted individually. Informed consent was taken
from all the subjects after explaining the purpose of the study. They
were told that their identity will not be disclosed in any kind of
publication of the study without their consent. Experimental group
subjects were contacted from Osho Dhyandeep Kendra, Bareilly,
where they received a 21 days dynamic meditation training under
the guidance of Swami Gyan Samarpan coordinator of Osho
Dhyandeep Kendra. Control group matched in terms of important
characteristics with the experimental group was contacted from
different localities of Bareilly city. Anxiety scale was administered
to experimental and control group before and after dynamic
meditation training. Post assessment was done after 21 days of
dynamic meditation training. Obtained data were analyzed with the
help of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Table 1: Reliability for anxiety scale on the present sample
Reliability N Cronbach’s alpha
Whole sample 60 0.96
Experimental group 30 0.96
Control group 30 0.96
Whole sample 60 0.95
Experimental group 30 0.94
Control group 30 0.96
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing 2014, 5(8), 1-912 911
Obtained results are being presented in the Tables 2-6.
Table 2 is used to check the assumption of homogeneity of the
regression slope. It can be observed that there was non-significant
F-ratio (F=0.73, P=0.39) between the variance of experimental and
control group on anxiety. It means that data have not violated the
assumption of homogeneity of the regression slope. Therefore, we
can perform the ANCOVA test.
To check the assumption of equality of variance “Levene’s test
of equality of error variances” was applied. As shown in table, the
significance level was 0.39 which is >0.05 which shows that the
data do not violate the assumption of equality of variance (Table 3).
Table 4 shows that in the post-assessment condition, the mean
of the experimental group (21.20) was lesser than the control group
The effect of the covariate (pre-tests assessment) had been
statistically removed by calculating adjusted mean given in the
table. Table 5 shows that the mean of the experimental group
(20.95) was lesser than the control group (23.44).
Table 6 reveals that there was a significant difference between
the two groups on post assessment scores on the scale of anxiety
(F=4.94, P=0.03) as per the Table 4, the anxiety score of the
experimental group was lesser than the control group which shows
that meditation significantly help in reducing the anxiety of the
experimental group. The effect size of the meditation was moderate
(as per the guidelines of Cohen, 1988; 0.01 small 0.06 moderate
0.14 large) as depicted by partial Eta squared (0.08).
Analysis of ANCOVA in Table 6 showed that there was a significant
difference between the two groups on post assessment scores on the
scale of anxiety (F=4.94, P=0.03) as per the Table 4, the anxiety
score of the experimental group was lesser than the control group
which shows that meditation significantly help in reducing the
anxiety of the experimental group. The effect size of the meditation
was found to be moderate (as per the guidelines of Cohen, 1988;
0.01 small 0.06 moderate 0.14 large) as depicted by partial Eta
Findings of the present study have been supported by the work
conducted by Arana (2006) and Koszycki et al., (2007). These
studies showed that mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)
proved effective in improving the clinical symptom profile of social
anxiety, depression, rumination, state anxiety, and self-esteem in
adults with social anxiety disorder (SAD). These findings replicate
and extend preliminary reports of symptom reduction in patients
with SAD related to mindfulness training.
Jha et al., (2007) found in their study that changes in cognitive
forms of emotional regulation like attentional deployment have
been proposed as core mechanisms by which MBSR improves
clinical symptoms in patients with anxiety and depression
Dynamic meditation technique used in the present study was
also found to control anxiety of the subjects. Probably, this form of
meditation was also using the same mechanism as suggested by Jha
et al., (2007) for a traditional form of meditation.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Arana, D. (2006). The practice of mindfulness meditation to alleviate the symptoms of
chronic shyness and social anxiety. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B.
The Sciences and Engineering, 67, 2822.
Bouras, N., & Holt, G. (2007). Psychiatric and Behavioral Disorders in Intellectual
and Developmental Disabilities. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carmody, J., & Baer, R.A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and
levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a
mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine,
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dalton, A., & Beach, S. (2006). Evidence that the transcendental meditation program
prevents or decreases diseases of the nervous system and is specifically beneficial
for epilepsy. Medical Hypotheses, 67(2), 240-246.
Table 2: Comparison between the control group and experimental
group on anxiety (covariate in pre‑condition)
Source Type III sum
Corrected model 16128.35 3 5376.11 326.80 0.000
Intercept 65.79 1 65.79 4.00 0.05
Group 13.66 1 13.66 0.83 0.36
Anxiety 1 15958.22 1 15958.22 970.05 0.000
Group*anxiety 1 260.01 1 260.01 0.73 0.39
Error 921.24 56 16.45
Total 46620.00 60
Corrected total 17049.60 59
Table 3: Leven’s test of equality of error variances
F df1 df2 Significant
0.73 1 58 0.39
Table 4: Means and standard deviation of experimental and
control group for total anxiety
Group Mean Standard deviation N
Experimental group 21.20 15.79 30
Control group 23.20 18.34 30
Total 22.20 16.99 60
Table 5: Estimated marginal mean
Group Mean Standard
Lower bound Upper bound
Experimental group 20.95 0.79 19.36 22.54
Control group 23.44 0.79 21.85 25.03
CI: Confidence interval
Table 6: Comparison between the control and experimental group
on anxiety (post)
Source Type III
F Significant Partial
Corrected model 15974.97 2 7987.48 423.66 0.000 0.93
Intercept 66.26 1 66.26 3.51 0.06 0.05
Anxiety 1 15914.97 1 15914.97 844.15 0.000 0.93
Group 93.13 1 93.13 4.94 0.03 0.08
Error 1074.63 57 18.85
Total 46620.00 60
Corrected total 17049.60 59
912 NAVED ET AL/EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC MEDITATION ON ANXIETY
Goleman, D.J. (1996). The Meditative Mind: Varieties of Meditative Experience.
New York: Penguin Putnam.
Jain, S., Shapiro, S.L., Swanick, S., Roesch, S.C., Mills, P.J., Bell, I., & et al. (2007).
A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation versus relaxation training:
Effects on distress, positive states of mind, rumination, and distraction. Annals of
Behavioral Medicine, 33(1), 11-21.
Jha, A.P., Krompinger, J., & Baime, M.J. (2007). Mindfulness training modifies
subsystems of attention. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(2),
Jonathan, S. (2006). Experience of Meditation: Experts Introduce the Major Traditions.
Saint Paul: Paragon House.
Koszycki, D., Benger, M., Shlik, J., & Bradwejn, J. (2007). Randomized trial of a meditation-
based stress reduction program and cognitive behavior therapy in generalized social
anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(10), 2518-2526.
Kutz, I., Borysenko, J.Z., & Benson, H. (1985). Meditation and psychotherapy: a
rationale for the integration of dynamic psychotherapy, the relaxation response, and
mindfulness meditation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142(1), 1-8.
Marlatt, G.A., & Chawla, M. (2007). Meditation and alcohol use. Southern Medical
Journal, 100, 451-453.
Osho, (2003). Meditation: The Art of Ecstasy. New Delhi: Diamond Pocket Books
Shapiro, D.H. Jr. (1982). Overview: Clinical and physiological comparison of
meditation with other self-control strategies. American Journal of Psychiatry,
Simpson, T.L., Kaysen, D., Bowen, S., MacPherson, L.M., Chawla, N., Blume, A., &
et al. (2007). PTSD symptoms, substance use, and vipassana meditation among
incarcerated individuals. Journal of Trauma Stress, 20(3), 239-249.
Singh, N.N., Lancioni, G.E., Winton, A.S., Adkins, A.D., Wahler, R.G., Sabaawi, M., &
et al. (2007). Individuals with mental illness can control their aggressive behavior
through mindfulness training. Behavior Modification, 31(3), 313-328.
Sinha, A.K., & Sinha, L.N. (1995). Sinha’s Comprehensive Anxiety Test (SCAT). Agra:
National Psychological Corporation.
Smith, J.C. (1975). Meditation as psychotherapy: A review of the literature.
Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 558-564.
Vyas, A. (2007). Effects of seven-day Osho dynamic study: A pilot study. In Kostas
Andrea Fanti (eds.) Psychological Science: Research, Theory and Future
Directions, Athens: Atiner; p. 205- 220.
Wilber, K. (1998). The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion:
New York: Random House.
Williams, J.M., Duggan, D.S., Crane, C., & Fennell, M.J. (2006). Mindfulness-based
cognitive therapy for prevention of recurrence of suicidal behavior. Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 62(2), 201-210.