Content uploaded by Manpreet Singh Nanda
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Manpreet Singh Nanda on Jan 08, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
1 National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2017 | Vol 7 | Issue 4 (Online First)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Role of honey as adjuvant therapy in patients with sore throat
Manpreet Singh Nanda1, Shiv Parshad Mittal2, Vipan Gupta1
1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Kumarhatti, Solan,
Himachal Pradesh, India, 2Department of Medicine, Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, Kumarhatti, Solan, Himachal
Pradesh, India
Correspondence to: Manpreet Singh Nanda, E-mail: u_tell_me_80@yahoo.co.in
Received: December 02, 2016; Accepted: December 25, 2016
ABSTRACT
Background: Honey is a natural product which has been used since ages for curing of various
ailments. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the effect of honey for control of infection and inflammation in patients with
sore throat. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 patients with sore throat were taken up for the study. 100 patients,
in the study group, were given one tablespoon of honey twice a day along with anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, and
antiseptic gargles. Remaining 100 patients in control group were given other same medications without honey. Patients were
evaluated after 5, 10 and 15 days for throat congestion, fever, pain, patient satisfaction, and other criteria. Results: There
was faster relief of signs and symptoms of sore throat in the study group as compared to control group. There was greater
patient satisfaction in the study group. Conclusion: Honey is effective in faster recovery of signs and symptoms of sore
throat having antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties without causing any side effects.
KEY WORDS: Fever; Honey; Inflammation; Pharyngitis; Tonsillitis
INTRODUCTION
Medicinal importance of honey is known since ancient
times. It is said to possess antimicrobial property as well
as wound healing activity.[1] Honey though mainly made up
of sugars and water also contains vitamin B complex and
C with lots of minerals such as calcium, potassium, and
zinc.[2] Its broad spectrum antibacterial property against
pathogenic bacteria and oral bacteria like staphylococcus
and pseudomonas has been proved.[3] Honey is hygroscopic
so it can draw moisture out of the environment and
dehydrate bacteria and its high sugar content and low-level
pH also prevent microbes from growth.[4] Honey is known
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology Online 2016. © 2016 Manpreet Singh Nanda et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creative commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third partiesto copy and redistribute the materialin any medium or for mat and to
remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
for its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in
literature.[5]
Sore throat is one of the common symptoms of patients
visiting our ear, nose and throat (ENT) outpatient department
(OPD). It can be because of various inflammatory and
infective causes such as allergies, reflux disease, sinus
drainage, and tonsillitis. Sore throat can be of viral or infective
etiology.[6] Various treatments tried for sore throat have not
given satisfactory results. In various studies, local residents
have been found to use honey for pharyngitis and respiratory
ailments.[7] However, no scientific data are available in
literature regarding the same. Hence, we plan to conduct this
study to find out if honey has some role as an antibacterial,
anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant in treatment of sore throat
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was conducted on the patients visiting ENT and
medicine OPD of our medical college and hospital with
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Access this article online
Website: www.njppp.com Quick Response code
DOI: 10.5455/njppp.2017.7.1233125122016
Nanda et al. Honey as adjuvant therapy in patients with sore throat
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2
Volume 2 | Issue 4 | Sep-Oct 20152017 | Vol 7 | Issue 4 (Online First)
symptoms of sore throat from December 2015 to November
2016. 200 patients with signs and symptoms of sore throat
aged above 18 years of age were enrolled in this study after
taking written consent from the patients. The approval of
Institutional Ethical Committee was taken. Exclusion criteria
were patients with a history of diabetes, history of pollens
and bees allergy, allergic to honey those who were already
on treatment for sore throat and those with dislike to intake
honey. All the patients were examined and followed up by the
authors performing this study.
The patients were randomized alternatively into study and
control group. 100 patients in the study group were advised
to intake one tablespoon of honey twice a day slowly over
few minutes along with anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics,
and antiseptic gargles. Remaining 100 patients in the control
group were put only on antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs
and gargles without honey. The above treatments were given
maximum for 15 days or till the patients fully recovered from
sore throat whichever is earlier.
The patients were assessed after 5 days, 10 days, and
15 days after starting the treatment. The assessment points
were as follows:
1. Time to recovery - time taken to resolution of all signs
and symptoms of sore throat
2. The patients were assessed for subjective symptoms like
pain in throat, difficulty in swallowing and fever at each
visit
3. The oropharynx was examined at each visit for congestion
and other signs of sore throat
4. Complications - The patients were assessed for need for
hospitalization during the treatment period due to any
complications of sore throat such as high-grade fever,
dehydration, and severe painful swallowing
5. The patient satisfaction was assessed according
to LIKERT SCALE as 1 - completely satisfied,
2 - somewhat satisfied, 3 - no change/painful, 4 - not
satisfied/increased pain at each visit
6. The patients were enquired about any side effects on
taking honey.
RESULTS
A total of 200 patients who gave consent were enrolled in
this study. All the patients had complaints of sore throat. Data
were collected and analyzed. Patients above the age group of
18 years were taken in the study. There was an equal incidence
of sore throat in all the age groups. Male and female patients
were almost equal (Table 1).
About 200 patients with sore throat were taken up for the study.
100 patients in the study group were given one tablespoon
of honey twice a day along with anti-inflammatory drugs,
antibiotics, and antiseptic gargles. Remaining 100 patients
in control group were given other same medications without
honey. Patients were evaluated after 5, 10 and 15 days for
throat congestion, fever, pain, patient satisfaction, and other
criteria.
There was faster recovery from sore throat in study group
using honey than control group (Table 2).
Regarding individual signs and symptoms, there was
much faster recovery from fever within 5 days in the study
group as compared to control group (Table 3). The signs of
oropharyngeal congestion also had faster recovery in the
study group. There was no significant difference in patients
lost to follow-up in both groups (Table 3).
Regarding complications of sore throat, almost equal number
of patients in both groups needed hospitalization due to high
grade fever, severe odynophagia, dehydration, or other upper
respiratory tract complications (Figure 1).
Regarding patient satisfaction, patients in study group with
honey were more satisfied as compared to control group.
These results were more evident at first follow-up visit after
5 days (Table 4).
There were no side effects noted of honey in patients using
honey in the study group.
DISCUSSION
The role of honey as anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and
antioxidant agent was investigated in this study. The aim of
the study was to evaluate honey in controlling inflammation
and infection in patients with sore throat and its affect on
patient satisfaction and to study its adverse effects if any.
We have used commercially available honey for this study.
All the patients were initially examined and followed up
Table 1: Age and sex distribution
Age group Male Female Total
18-40 years 43 39 82
41-60 years 33 37 70
>60 years 23 25 48
Total 99 101 200
Table 2: Time to total recovery from sore throat
Time taken Study
group (n = 100)
Control
group (n = 100)
<5 days 45 38
5-10 days 28 32
10-15 days 11 14
Not recovered after 15 days 7 8
Lost to follow-up 9 8
Nanda et al. Honey as adjuvant therapy in patients with sore throat
3 National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2017 | Vol 7 | Issue 4 (Online First)
by the authors performing this study in ENT and medicine
OPD. As it included subjective criteria, only adults above
age of 18 years were included in this study. There was faster
relief of signs and symptoms of sore throat in study group
as compared to control group. There was greater patient
satisfaction in study group.
Sore throat is clinical evidence of tonsillitis or pharyngitis
and is very common in everyone’s life.[8] According to Bisno
44% of patients with sore throat had infective etiology.[9] In
our study also we found that 74 patients (37%) had fever
which is a sign of infection (Table 3). Other causes of sore
throat according to literature are allergies and reflux disease.
According to various studies recurrence rate of sore throat
varies between 16% and 20% and need for hospitalization due
to complications are around 3-4%.[9] In our study, 9 patients
(5%) needed to be hospitalized due to causes such as high-
grade fever, severe odynophagia, dehydration and other
pulmonary complications (Figure 1). 15 (8%) patients in our
study had residual or recurrent disease even after 15 days of
treatment (Table 1).
Honey is a common household product used since
ages for various treatments and is easily accessible and
nonexpensive.[10] It is made up of 181 components[11] mainly
composing of fructose, glucose, fructooligosaccharides,
amino acids, vitamins, minerals, enzymes, and water.[12] The
main enzymes in honey are invertase, amylase and glucose
oxidase.[13] Glucose oxidase produces hydrogen peroxide
which has antimicrobial activity. In history Indian, Egyptian
and Greek texts have shown use of honey as antiseptic.[14]
Van Ketel, in 1892, first recognized antimicrobial activity of
honey.[15] Honey by drawing moisture out dehydrates bacteria.
It is pH and sugar content also inhibits micro-organisms.[16] In
a study by Olaitan et al., authors found honey to be inhibitory
on both Gram-positive and Gram-negative, aerobes and
anaerobes.[13] In our study, we found faster recovery of fever
(infection) in study group using honey as compared to control
group without honey within 5 days of treatment (Table 3).
According to Al-Waili and Boni honey ingestion has anti-
inflammatory effect.[17] Honey is said to reduce the activity
of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclo oxygenase-2, thus showing
anti-inflammatory effect.[18] There is less edema, better
wound epithelization and tissue regeneration with honey.[17]
In our study, awe found faster recovery from oropharyngeal
congestion in study group using honey (Table 3). Honey
reduces prostaglandin E2 and alpha 2 in blood leading to
pain relief.[19] In our study, we found better relief and greater
patient satisfaction in study group using honey (Table 4). The
satisfactory results were achieved faster in the study group
as compared to control group, and there was faster recovery
using honey (Table 2).
Table 3: Relief of signs of sore throat
Signs Initial visit 1st follow-up (after
5 days)
2nd follow-up (after
10 days)
3rd follow-up (after
15 days)
Study
group
Control
group
Study
group
Control
group
Study
group
Control
group
Study
group
Control
group
Fever 38 36 18 26 5 7 2 2
Oropharyngeal congestion 100 100 48 56 18 22 7 8
Lost to follow-up - - 769898
Table 4: Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction 1st follow-up (after
5 days)
2nd follow-up (after
10 days)
3rd follow-up (after
15 days)
Study
group
Control
group
Study
group
Control
group
Study
group
Control
group
Completely satisfied 24 18 64 57 79 77
Somewhat satisfied 24 23 8 11 3 3
No change 20 21 7 9 3 3
Not satisfi ed (increased pain) 25 32 12 15 6 9
Figure 1: Need for hospitalization
Nanda et al. Honey as adjuvant therapy in patients with sore throat
National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 4
Volume 2 | Issue 4 | Sep-Oct 20152017 | Vol 7 | Issue 4 (Online First)
The side effects of honey are rare. It can cause stinging pain
due to acidic pH.[20] No permanent resistance to honey has
been noted.[21] In our study, no side effects of honey were
noted.
There is scope of further studies regarding honey in other
infective disorders. There is also scope of study also including
children and seeing the affect of honey on them which could
be a limitation of our study. There are various subtypes of
honey available and comparative studies on each of them
could be done in future.
CONCLUSION
Honey is an easily available household product which has
anti-inflammatory, anti-infective and antioxidant properties
in the treatment of sore throat. Honey leads to faster recovery
of signs and symptoms of sore throat. Patient satisfaction is
much higher when honey is added to the treatment. The signs
and symptoms of pain, fever, and oropharyngeal congestion
recover much faster when honey is added to the therapy.
There are no side effects or resistance on intake of honey and
is considered as a safe remedy. Hence, we can conclude that
intake of honey as adjuvant therapy would benefit patients
with sore throat.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank our Medical College and Hospital
for its support and the patients for cooperating with the study
protocol.
REFERENCES
1. Lusby PE, Coombes AL, Wilkinson JM. Bactericidal activity
of different honeys against pathogenic bacteria. Arch Med Res.
2005;36(5):464-7.
2. Vallianou NG, Gounari P, Skourtis A, Vallianou NG, Gounari P,
Skourtis A, et al. Honey and its anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial
and anti-oxidant properties. General Med. 2014;2:132.
3. French VM, Cooper RA, Molan PC. The antibacterial
activity of honey against coagulase-negative staphylococci.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(1):228-31.
4. Molan PC. The antibacterial nature of honey. The nature of the
antibacterial activity. Bee World. 1992;73(1):5-28.
5. Mandal MD, Mandal S. Honey: Its medicinal property
and antibacterial activity. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed.
2011;1(2):154-60.
6. Del Mar CB, Glasziou PP, Spinks AB. Antibiotics for sore
throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;4:CD000023.
7. Meda A, Lamien CE, Millogo J, Romito M, Nacoulma OG.
Therapeutic uses of honey and honeybee larvae in central
Burkina Faso. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;95(1):103-7.
8. Hayward G, Thompson MJ, Perera R, Glasziou PP,
Del Mar CB, Heneghan CJ. Corticosteroids as standalone or
add-on treatment for sore throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2012;10(1):CD008268.
9. Bisno AL. Acute pharyngitis. N Engl J Med.
2001;344(3):205-11.
10. Kamaruddin MY, Zainabe SA, Anwar S, Razif MA, Yassim MY.
The efficacy of honey dressing on chronic wounds and ulcers.
In: Juraj M, editor. Honey: Current Research and Clinical
Uses. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2012. p. 185-96.
11. Rezk MY, Abulfadle KA. Does natural honey affect
gastric emptying in rats? Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol.
2013;3:185-90.
12. Chow J. Probiotics and prebiotics: A brief overview. J Ren
Nutr. 2002;12(2):76-86.
13. Olaitan PB, Adeleke OE, Ola IO. Honey: A reservoir for
microorganisms and an inhibitory agent for microbes. Afr
Health Sci. 2007;7(2):159-65.
14. Bansal V, Medhi B, Pandhi P. Honey – A remedy rediscovered
and its therapeutic utility. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ).
2005;3(3):305-9.
15. Dustmann JH. Antibacterial effect of honey. Apiacta.
1979;14:7-11.
16. Shin H, Ustunol Z. Carbohydrate composition of honey from
different floral sources and their influence on growth of
selected intestinal bacteria. Food Res Int. 2005;38:721-8.
17. Al-Waili NS, Boni NS. Natural honey lowers plasma
prostaglandin concentrations in normal individuals. J Med
Food. 2003;6(2):129-33.
18. Markelov VV, Trushin MV. Bee venom therapy and low
dose naltrexone for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nepal J
Neurosci. 2006;3(2):71-7.
19. Ozlugedik S, Genc S, Unal A, Elhan AH, Tezer M, Titiz A.
Can postoperative pains following tonsillectomy be
relieved by honey? A prospective, randomized, placebo
controlled preliminary study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.
2006;70(11):1929-34.
20. Betts JA, Molan PC, editors. A pilot Trial of Honey as a Wound
Dressing has Shown the Importance of the Way that Honey is
Applied to Wounds. 11th Conference of the European Wound
Management Association; 2001, Dublin, Ireland.
21. Cooper RA, Jenkins L, Henriques AF, Duggan RS, Burton NF.
Absence of bacterial resistance to medical-grade manuka
honey. Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:1237-41.
How to cite this article: Nanda MS, Mittal SP, Gupta V. Role
of honey as adjuvant therapy in patients with sore throat. Natl J
Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2017;7 (Online First): Doi: 10.5455/
njppp.2017.7.1233125122016
Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.