Content uploaded by Laila Nimri
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Laila Nimri on Jan 05, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
JMM Case Reports
Community-acquired urinary tract infections caused by Burkholderia cepacia complex
in patients with no underlying risk factor.
--Manuscript Draft--
Manuscript Number: JMMCR-D-16-00081R2
Full Title: Community-acquired urinary tract infections caused by Burkholderia cepacia complex
in patients with no underlying risk factor.
Article Type: Case Report
Section/Category: Urinary tract and reproductive organs
Order of Authors: Laila F Nimri, Ph.D.
Mamuno Sulaiman, MSc
Osama Bani Hani, MD
Abstract: Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) remain the common infections diagnosed in
outpatients as well as hospitalized patients. The community-acquired urinary tract
infections (CA-UTIs) are mostly caused by Escherichia coli, and other members of the
family Enterobacteriaceae. Burkholderia cepacia is an opportunistic pathogen mainly
affecting immunocompromised and hospitalized patients particularly those with prior
broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy.
Case presentation: Urine samples were collected from 157 outpatients clinically
diagnosed with UTI and from 100 healthy control subjects. Samples were cultured on
differential media and non- motile lactose- non fermentors colonies were identified by
Remel RapID™ ONE system. The isolates were tested by disc diffusion method
against 17 antimicrobial agents. Burkholderia was isolated as a single organism from
four patients having uncomplicated infections, and one from recurrent infection. None
of these patients has underlying risk factor for this pathogen. Identification of these
isolates by Remel-RapID ONE™System was confirmed by recA gene amplification.
The four isolates were resistant to lincomycin, nalidixic acid, oxacillin, and penicillin G.
These cases received monotherapy of oral co-trimoxazole.
Conclusions: Our findings would alert the urologists and diagnostic laboratories to the
potential of B. cepacia complex infections in similar cases, and that this bacterium
should not be ruled out.
First Author: Laila F Nimri, Ph.D.
Corresponding Author: Laila F Nimri, Ph.D.
Jordan University of Science & Technology
Irbid, Ir JORDAN
Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
JMM CASE REPORTS
Case report template
TITLE OF CASE: Community-acquired urinary tract infections caused by
Burkholderia cepacia complex in patients with no underlying risk factor
Laila Nimri 1, Mamuno Sulaiman2, Osama Bani Hani3
Address: 1 Department of Laboratory Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and
Technology, Irbid, Jordan; 2 Department of General and Pediatric Surgery, Jordan University
of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Corresponding author: Laila Nimri
Corresponding author email address: nimri@just.edu.jo
The full names and institutional addresses for all authors must be included on the title page.
In order to assist us in choosing the correct editor to handle your paper, please choose one box in each of the
following categories:
Field: √Human ☐Dental ☐Veterinary/Fisheries
Subject: √Bacteriology ☐Virology ☐ Mycology ☐ Parasitology
Keywords: Please provide at least one keyword for each of the following categories:
Disease/Indication: Burkholderia cepacia complex; community-acquired; antimicrobial
susceptibility pattern; urinary tract infections
Pathology/Symptoms:
Treatment:
Abstract Up to 250 words summarising the case presentation and outcome (this will be shown on
preview and search panes)
Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) remain the common infections diagnosed in
outpatients as well as hospitalized patients. The community-acquired urinary tract infections
(CA-UTIs) are mostly caused by Escherichia coli, and other members of the family
Enterobacteriaceae. Burkholderia cepacia is an opportunistic pathogen mainly affecting
Manuscript Including References (Word document) Click here to download Manuscript Including References
(Word document) Nimri-JMMCR-D-16-00081R2
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
immunocompromised and hospitalized patients particularly those with prior broad-spectrum
antibacterial therapy.
Case Presentation: Urine samples were collected from 157 outpatients clinically diagnosed
with UTI and from 100 healthy control subjects. Samples were cultured on differential media
and non- motile lactose- non fermentors colonies were identified by Remel RapID™ ONE
system. The isolates were tested by disc diffusion method against 19 antimicrobial agents.
Burkholderia was isolated as a single organism from four patients having uncomplicated
infections, and one from recurrent infection. None of these patients has underlying risk factor
for this pathogen. Identification of these isolates by Remel-RapID ONE™System and was
confirmed by recA gene amplification. The four isolates were resistant to colistin (polymyxin
E), lincomycin, nalidixic acid, oxacillin, penicillin G and polymyxin B. These cases received
monotherapy of oral co-trimoxazole.
Conclusion: Our findings would alert the urologists and diagnostic laboratories to the
potential of B. cepacia complex infections in similar cases, and that this bacterium should not
be ruled out.
Introduction Background; why do you think this case is important – why did you write it up?
Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most frequently encountered
infections in the outpatient setting (Wagenlehner et al., 2011). Urine is normally sterile, but
intestinal bacteria originating from the anus may gain ascending entry through the urethra or
rarely from the bloodstream and cause an infection in the urinary system (Ronald, 2003).
The diagnosis of UTI is made based on the clinical picture of illness and urine culture.
Most UTIs are uncomplicated, and empirical treatment may be initiated for those patients
without the benefit of urine culture (Bahadin et al., 2011). Community-acquired infections
are often distinguished from nosocomial, or hospital-
acquired, diseases by the types of organisms that affect hospitalized patients. Patients with
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
hospital-acquired UTIs have more comorbidities, and recurrent UTI, and have previously
received antibiotics more often than patients with CA-UTI (Horcajada et al., 2012). UTI
caused by B. cepacia was reported after renal transplantation (Li et al., 2003), and in
recurrent UTI and complete anatomical evaluation was recommended in such cases after
renal transplant (Zeeshan et al., 2012). Burkholderia cepacia may also be a causative
pathogen for nosocomial UTI in pediatric patients with predisposing factors (Lee et al.,
2015).
Escherichia coli remains the predominant uropathogen (80%) isolated in
uncomplicated acute community-acquired infections (CA-UTI) (Ronald, 2003). However, the
common pathogens traditionally associated with UTIs are changing many of their features,
particularly because of antimicrobial resistance. In addition, complicated UTI has a more
diverse etiology than uncomplicated urinary cases, and organisms that rarely cause disease in
healthy patients can cause significant disease in hosts with anatomic, metabolic, or
immunologic underlying disease (Ronald, 2003).
The knowledge of the uropathogens and their antibacterial susceptibility that may vary with
time is important for treatment. In many clinical laboratories, urine cultures account for
24%–40% of submitted cultures; and 80% of these urine cultures are submitted from the
outpatient setting (Wilson & Gaido, 2004). Rates of antibiotic resistance have considerably
changed, and consequently the empirical treatment of UTI requires constant updating based
on the antimicrobial susceptibility of the main uropathogens of the area, or country (Alós,
2005; Zeeshan et al., 2012).
This case study reports on CA-UTI caused by members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex
in otherwise healthy individuals and the isolates antibiotic resistance patterns.
Case Report
Urine samples were collected from 157 symptomatic outpatients visiting urology clinics, who
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
were clinically diagnosed with UTI and from 100 healthy individuals, who didn’t report any
signs or symptoms of UTI in the past year and were willing to participate.
The study protocol was approved by the University Institutional Review Board (IRB). All
subjects signed an informed consent form before collecting the samples. A structured
questionnaire was filled in-person for each patient, and control subject by a trained
investigator. The questionnaire included demographic data such as sex, age, and questions
regarding the infection, clinical data and medication if any.
Investigations If relevant
Urine samples were cultured on selective media for Gram negative bacteria that were
incubated at 37oC for 48 hours. Cultures with a bacterial count of ≥ 103 CFU/mL of urine
were considered positive.
Diagnosis If relevant
Four of the non-motile, lactose-non fermenting isolates were identified biochemically as
Burkholderia cepacia using Remel-RapID ONE™System (Thermo Scientific, USA) based
on ERIC® electronic code compendium ((http://www.remel.com/eric/) designed to work
exclusively with this system. Identification of the four isolates as members of Burkholderia
cepacia complex was confirmed by amplifying the B. cepacia complex recA gene (1,040 bp)
using BCR1 and BCR2 primers (Mahenthiralingam et al., 2000). LB broth (Bioscience,
USA) was used for the storage of stock cultures of selected isolates.
This bacterium was isolated as a single organism from two males, and two females, age range
(28-45 years). Three isolates were from patients having uncomplicated infections, and one
isolate was from female patient having recurrent infections. The most common symptoms
reported by patients included urgency to urinate, frequency, discomfort and pain, typically in
the lower back and abdominal area, or when urinating.
The antibiotic susceptibility of the four B. cepacia complex isolates was assessed in vitro to
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
19 antibiotics by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton Agar according to CLSI, 2012
and CLSI 2007 (Table 1). All four B. cepacia were resistant to colistin (polymyxin E),
lincomycin, nalidixic acid, oxacillin, polymyxin B and penicillin G. Three were resistant to
ampicillin, and cefixime, 2 were resistant to tetracycline, while only one was resistant to
amoxicillin, azithromycin, cefotaxime, piperacillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
However, all four isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin,
imipenem, and levofloxacin.
Treatment If relevant
Consisted of oral co-trimoxazole twice daily for 5-7 days, the dose is weight dependent.
Outcome and follow-up If relevant
Discussion
Uncomplicated community-acquired UTIs and in hospitalized patients are extremely
common infections (Khatri et al., 2012; Wagenlehner et al., 2011). In the current study,
Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates were among the bacterial species recovered from four
outpatients with uncomplicated infections; these patients had no underlying risk factor and no
history of recurrent UTI. There was a strong connection to the infection because this
bacterium was isolated as a single organism in these patients. Infections with this species
might be often misdiagnosed in the clinical laboratories because the identification of
suspected B. cepacia (formerly Pseudomonas cepacia) isolates is performed using a
combination of selective media, conventional biochemical analysis, commercial test systems
and PCR-based assays if available (van Pelt et al., 1999). These tests are not routinely used in
diagnostic laboratories and several laboratories have experienced difficulty in identifying this
bacterium. B. cepacia complex is an important nosocomial pathogen in patients, particularly
those with prior broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy (Gautam et al., 2011). However,
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
Pseudomonas cepacia was first reported in renal calculi in non-immunocompromised patients
(Roberts & Speller, 1973).
An earlier study conducted in Jordan reported a high fatality rate in a nosocomial outbreak
caused by Burkholderia cepacia in patients suffering from diseases other than cystic fibrosis
(Bacteraemia or respiratory colonization) (Shehabi et al., 2004).
B. cepacia is one of the most antimicrobial-resistant organisms with high intrinsic resistance
encountered in the clinical laboratory; and such infections can be very difficult to treat
resulting in death in some cases (Gautam et al., 2011). All four urinary B. cepacia complex
isolates recovered in our study showed resistance or intermediate susceptibility to one or
more of the antimicrobial agents. B. cepacia complex strains are multidrug resistant due to
innate and acquired mechanisms of resistance (Aaron et al., 2000).
The four B. cepacia complex isolates in our study were preliminary identified by Remel-
RapID ONE™System and were confirmed by recA gene amplification. All four isolates were
resistant to colistin and polymyxin B, and these two antibiotics have been used as a
diagnostic test for B. cepacia (Nzula et al., 2002). A lack of binding sites on the
lipopolysaccharide of B. cepacia complex leads to intrinsic resistance to the cationic
antimicrobials, aminoglycosides and polymyxins (Arnold et al., 2007; Cox, and Wilkinson,
1991).
One of the isolates was resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Table 1). B. cepacia is
often susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, however, emerging resistance to these
antimicrobial agents are of increasing clinical concern, especially among cystic fibrosis (CF)
patients with B. cepacia complex respiratory infection, where only 5% of over 2600 strains
tested were susceptible to this agent (Zhou et al., 2007). However, the susceptibility profiles
of strains from CF patients may differ from those noted in strains from other patients because
presumably CF patients receive multiple courses of oral, intravenous, and aerosolized
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
antibiotics (Moss, 1995).
Resistance to trimethoprim is mediated by production of dyhydrofolate reductase or
acquisition of outer membrane antibiotic efflux pumps that confer cross resistance to
chloramphenicol and fluoroquinolones (Burns et al., 1989). For serious infection with
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant strains or sulfa drug allergy, combination therapy
guided by in vitro susceptibility results should be administered.
In most UTI cases, empirical treatment without the benefit of a pre-therapy urine culture is
used. Most clinicians are not aware of this potential uropathogens. The antimicrobial use,
whether appropriate or inappropriate, is associated with the selection for antimicrobial-
resistant organisms colonizing or infecting the UT. Thus, infections caused by
antimicrobial-resistant organisms are associated with higher rates of treatment failures
(Abbo & Hooton, 2014). Therefore, knowledge of the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of
uropathogens causing uncomplicated CA-UTIs should guide therapeutic decisions
(Wagenlehner et al., 2011).
In conclusion, our finding of B. cepacia complex infections in four outpatients with no
underlying risk factor would alert the clinical diagnostic laboratories to the potential presence
of this significant pathogen and to include their identification in similar cases. In addition, the
multiresistance of most isolates to several tested antimicrobial agents should guide
therapeutic decisions.
References Vancouver Style
Aaron, S.D., Ferris, W., Henry, D.A., Speert, D.P., & Macdonald, N.E. (2000). Multiple
combination bactericidal antibiotic testing for patients with cystic fibrosis infected
with Burkholderia cepacia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161,1206-1212.
Abbo, L. M., & Hooton, T. M. (2014). Antimicrobial stewardship and urinary tract
infections. Antibiotics 3, 174-192.
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
Alós, J. I. (2005). Epidemiology and etiology of urinary tract infections in the community.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the main pathogens and clinical significance of resistance.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 23, 3-8.
Arnold TM, Forrest GN, Messmer KJ. (2007). Polymyxin antibiotics for Gram-negative
infections. Am J Health Syst Pharm 64, 819-826.
Bahadin, J., Teo, S. H., & Mathew, S. (2011). Aetiology of community-acquired urinary
tract infection and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of uropathogens isolated. Singapore
Med J 52, 415-420.
Burns, J.L., Lien, D.M, & Hedin, L.A. (1989). Isolation and characterization of
dihydrofolate reductase from trimethoprim-susceptible and trimethoprim-resistant
Pseudomonas cepacia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 33, 1247-1251.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2007) Performance standards for
antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Seventh informational supplement M100-S17. CLSI,
Wayne, PA. USA.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012). Performance Standards for
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-second informational supplement M100-
S22:32. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA.
Gautam, V., Singhal, L, &Ray P. (2011). Burkholderia cepacia complex: Beyond
Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter. Indian J Med Microbiol 29, 4-12.
Cox, A. D., Wilkinson, S. G. (1991). Ionizing groups in lipopolysaccharides of
Pseudomonas cepacia in relation to antibiotic resistance. Mol Microbiol 5, 641‐646.
Horcajada, J.P., Shaw, E., Padilla, B., et al., (2013). Healthcare-associated, community-
acquired and hospital-acquired bacteraemic urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients: a
prospective multicentre cohort study in the era of antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol
Infect 19, 962-968.
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
Khatri, B., Basnyat, S., Karki, A., et al. (2012). Etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility
pattern of bacterial pathogens from urinary tract infection. Nepal Med Coll J 14, 129-132.
Lee, K.W., Lee, S. K., & Cho, H. (2015). Burkholderia cepacia causing nosocomial urinary
tract infection in children. Child Kidney Dis 19, 143-147.
Li, F. K., Chan, K. W., Chan, T. M. & Lai, K. N. (2003). Burkholderia urinary tract
infection after renal transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 5, 59-61.
Mahenthiralingam, E., Bischof, J., Byrne, S.K., Radomski, C., Davies, J.E., Av-Gay, Y.,
& Vandamme, P. (2000). DNA-Based diagnostic approaches for identification of
Burkholderia cepacia complex, Burkholderia vietnamiensis, Burkholderia multivorans,
Burkholderia stabilis, and Burkholderia cepacia genomovars I and III. J Clin Microbiol. 38,
3165-3173.
Moss, R. B. (1995). Cystic fibrosis: pathogenesis, pulmonary infection, and treatment. Clin
Infect Dis 21:839-849.
Nzula, S., Vandamme, P., Govan, J.R. (2002). Influence of taxonomic status on the in vitro
antimicrobial susceptibility of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Antimicrob Chemother.
50:265-269.
Roberts, J.B., & Speller, D.C. (1973). Letter: Pseudomonas cepacia in renal calculi. Lancet
2,1099.
Ronald, A. (2003). The etiology of urinary tract infection: traditional and emerging
pathogens. Dis Mon 49, 71-82.
Shehabi, A.A., Abu-Al-Soud, W., Mahafzah, A., Khuri-Bulos, N., Abu Khader, I., Ouis,
I.S., & Wadström T. (2004). Investigation of Burkholderia cepacia nosocomial outbreak
with high fatality in patients suffering from diseases other than cystic fibrosis. Scand J Infect
Dis 36, 174-178.
van Pelt, C., Verduin, C. M., Goessens, W.H. , et al. (1999) Identification of
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
Burkholderia spp. in the clinical microbiology laboratory: Comparison of conventional and
molecular methods.J Clin Microbiol 37, 2158-2164.
Wagenlehner, F. M., Hoyme, U., Kaase, M., et al. (2011). Uncomplicated urinary tract
infections. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108, 415–423.
Wilson, M.L., & Gaido. (2004). Laboratory Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections in Adult
Patients. Clin Infect Dis 38, 1150-1158.
Zeeshan, M., Aziz, T, & Naqvi, F. (2012). Recurrent urinary tract infection by Burkholderia
cepacia in a live related renal transplant recipient. J Pak Med Assoc 62, 496-498.
Zhou, J., Chen, Y., Tabibi, S., Alba, L., Garber, E., & Saiman, L. (2007). Antimicrobial
susceptibility and synergy studies of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolated from patients
with cystic fibrosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51,1085-1088.
Figure/Table Captions Maximum of 2 figures and 2 tables
Table 1. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of four B. cepacia complex isolates, zone of
inhibition (mm) as defined by CLSI, 2012 and CLSI, 2007.
Antibiotic
Symbol/
disk
potency
(g/mcg)
108P
B.
cepacia
(mm)
078P
B.
cepacia
(mm)
087P
B.
cepacia
(mm)
047P
B. cepacia
(mm)
Amoxicillin
AMC-30
(17) I*
(08) R
(20) S
(19) S
Ampicillin
AM-10
(08) R
(08) R
(15) S
(06) R
Azithromycin
AZM-15
(15) I
(18) S
(18) S
(12) R
Cefixime
CFM-5
(17) I
(13) R
(11) R
(10) R
Cefotaxime
CTX-30
(26) S
(21) R
(24) I
(30) S
Ceftazidime
CAZ-30
(21) S
(28) S
(29) S
(26) S
Ciprofloxacin
CIP-5
(36) S
(30) S
(34) S
(35) S
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
Gentamicin
CN-10
(18) S
(23) S
(30) S
(18) S
Imipenem
IPM-10
(22) S
(29)S
(30) S
(20) S
Colistin
CT-25
(00) R
(00) R
(06) R
(00) R
Levofloxacin
LEV-5
(36) S
(36) S
(34)S
(30)S
Lincomycin
L-2
(00) R
(00)R
(00) R
(00) R
Nalidixic acid
NA-30
(15) R
(14) R
(15) R
(13) R
Oxacillin
OX-1
(00) R
(00) R
(00) R
(00) R
Penicillin G
P-10 I.U.
(12) R
(08) R
(08) R
(11) R
Piperacillin
PRL-100
(27) S
(28)S
(28)S
(14)R
Polymyxin B
PB-300U
(00) R
(00) R
(00) R
(00) R
Tetracycline
TE-30
(00) R
(22)S
(22)S
(08)R
Trimethoprim-
sulfamethoxazole
SXT-25
(17) S
(18) S
(18) S
(06) R†
* R: resistant, I: intermediate, S: susceptible
† Isolate from female, recurrent infection
Abbreviations
UTI, urinary tract infection; B. cepacia, Burkholderia cepaci
Author statements: Please complete the following sections (refer to Information for authors for more
information on the requirements for these sections).
Funding information
This work was supported by the deanship of research at Jordan University of Science and
Technology, grant number 14/2014.
Acknowledgements.
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
Ethical statement
The study protocol was approved by the University Institutional Review Board (IRB). All
subjects signed an informed consent form before collecting the samples.
Conflicts of interest
None
*Licence to Publish forms are provided during submission through Editorial Manager.
**Authors are responsible for attaining patient consent and will be asked to confirm this during
submission. Read our ethical guidelines here:
http://www.microbiologyresearch.org/authors/editorial-policies#ethics.
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 94.249.116.223
On: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:51:44
1
Table 1. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing of four B. cepacia complex isolates,
zone of inhibition (mm) as defined by CLSI-2012.
Antibiotic
Symbol/
disk
potency
(g/mcg)
108P
B.
cepacia
(mm)
078P
B.
cepaci
a
(mm)
087P
B.
cepacia
(mm)
047P
B. cepacia
(mm)
Amoxicillin
AMC-30
(17) I*
(08) R
(20) S
(19) S
Ampicillin
AM-10
(08) R
(08) R
(15) S
(06) R
Azithromycin
AZM-15
(15) I
(18) S
(18) S
(12) R
Cefixime
CFM-5
(17) I
(13) R
(11) R
(10) R
Cefotaxime
CTX-30
(26) S
(21) R
(24) I
(30) S
Ceftazidime
CAZ-30
(21) S
(28) S
(29) S
(26) S
Ciprofloxacin
CIP-5
(36) S
(30) S
(34) S
(35) S
Gentamicin
CN-10
(18) S
(23) S
(30) S
(18) S
Imipenem
IPM-10
(22) S
(29)S
(30) S
(20) S
Levofloxacin
LEV-5
(36) S
(36) S
(34)S
(30)S
Lincomycin
L-2
(00) R
(00)R
(00) R
(00) R
Nalidixic acid
NA-30
(15) R
(14) R
(15) R
(13) R
Oxacillin
OX-1
(00) R
(00) R
(00) R
(00) R
Penicillin G
P-10 I.U.
(12) R
(08) R
(08) R
(11) R
Piperacillin
PRL-100
(27) S
(28)S
(28)S
(14)R
Tetracycline
TE-30
(00) R
(22)S
(22)S
(08)R
Trimethoprim-
sulfamethoxazole
SXT-25
(17) S
(18) S
(18) S
(06) R†
* R: resistant, I: intermediate, S: susceptible
† Isolate from female, recurrent infection
Table 1 Click here to download Table Burkholderia CA-UTIs-Table 1-
JMM Case Reports.docx