Content uploaded by Amela Jeričević
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Amela Jeričević on Jan 03, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
MODELING & ANALYSIS OF AVIATION EMISSIONS IMPACT ON
LOCAL AIR QUALITY
Amela Jeričević and Goran Gašparac
CCAA & GEKOM Zagreb
-Emissions estimations
-Measurements analyses
-Model (WRFChem, CAMx) calculation
-Conclusions
Overview
Aviation emissions
The emissions produced by aviation come from the
use of jet fuel (jet kerosene and jet gasoline) and
aviation gasoline (small piston engine aircraft only)
the principal pollutants (common to other
combustion activities)
CO2, CO, HC and NO, SO2 ( dependent of the level
of sulphur in the fuel.)
Other important species, emitted at relatively low
concentrations include PM , N2O and CH4.
TIER 1
The emission factors have been averaged over all flying
phases assuming 10 % of the fuel is used in the LTO
The total contribution of aircraft emissions to total global anthropogenic CO2
emissions is considered to be about 2 % (IPCC, 1999).
This relatively small contribution to global emissions should be seen in relation to
the fact that most aircraft emissions are injected almost directly into the upper free
troposphere and lower stratosphere. IPCC has estimated that the contribution to
radiative forcing is about 3.5 %.
The importance of this source is growing as the volume of air traffic is steadily
increasing.
Contribution of air traffic to total emissions
ICAO LTO cycle
Below 3000 ft
The ICAO Aircraft
Engine Exhaust
Databank (AEED)
contains rates of fuel
flow and emission
indices for NOx, HC and
CO as a function of the
engine thrust setting
for a large number of
types of aircraft engine.
Aircraft movements-Eurocontrol database
Emissions_LTO= Activity(N_ LTO cyclus)*E_LTO
DDR2
SAAM tool
AQ
Measurements
Emission contribution quantified
through monitoring
Gorica
~1 km SE (NOx)
ZG3 (UB)
~ 3.5 km NW (NOx, O3, SO2,CO,
PM10)
ZG1 (UT)
~ 6 km NW (NOx, PM10, CO, SO2)
Measurements-time series
Urban Traffic Urban Background(N from airport) Urban Background
(S from the airport)
R, Openair, Carslaw, 2012
Model was run for the case study
period 1.-6. August 2015.
-Models setup horizontal
domains (2.2 km x 2.2 km), 50
vertical levels
EMISSIONS
-Anthropogenic emissions-
RETRO/EDGARv4
-aviation emissions: vertically
agregated in the grid in
WRFChem and CAMx
WRFChem & CAMx
Model
Ozone
CAMx a
30% contribution to surface concentrations
due to aviation emissions
CAMx-cont
Pleso
Conclusions
WRFChem well represented the wind flow but both models
underestimated night time NO2 –road transport emissions not well
represented
CAMx contribution due to aviation emissions up to 30%
Bivariate polar plot usefull toll for assesing the sources of AP but the
stations representativity should be carefully assessed
Future plans
Deatiled Emissions
There is currently little information available to estimate emissions
from start up of engines and these are not included in the LTO cycle.
This is not of great importance for total national emissions, but they
may have an impact on the air quality in the vicinity of airports.
Models (ADMS)
Mesurements-longer time periods and pollutants e.g. PM-fine