Content uploaded by Sean Furey
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sean Furey on Jan 02, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
What’s Working, Where, and for How Long:
A 2016 Water Point Update
7th RWSN Forum, November 29, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
BACKGROUND
In 2010, the Rural Water Supply Network (RWSN) Executive Steering
Committee published “Myths of the Rural Water Supply Sector” (RWSN,
2010). Among the seven myths, No. 2 “Building water supply systems is
more important than keeping them working” highlighted estimates from
2007 and 2009 of handpump functionality in selected Sub-Saharan
countries (RWSN, 2009, Baumann, 2009). The summary statistic that
around 36% of handpumps are not working at any one time in Sub-Saharan
is perhaps the most widely quoted RWSN output.
WHY A 2016 UPDATE?
This update to the 2009 handpump functionality statistics builds upon that
foundation in several important ways:
Beyond estimates to real data: Water point mapping is a whole new
area of endeavour that has opened up due improvements in
Information Communications Technologies (ICTs), which were not in
widespread use in 2009.
Not just handpumps: Water point data provides insights into a range of
water point types. An analysis on the functionality of different types of
water points has been included.
New insights: This update includes an analysis of functionality of water
points constructed within two years of the survey date.
Transparency: All findings are based on data that is publically available
through the Water Point Data Exchange at www.WaterPointData.org.
Data Availability: Countries have only been included in this
benchmarking analysis if they meet criteria for having significant data
availability.
Regular updates: This summary can be updated on an annual basis,
integrating any new data available.
METHODOLOGY: FUNCTIONALITY BY COUNTRY
Countries were included in the benchmark if they had significant data available
through the Water Point Data Exchange. This includes countries where:
•More than two sources had contributed more than 100 records each; or
•The number of water point records analysed exceeded 50% of the number of
water points expected (based on JMP rural population data divided by 250
people).
Functionality figures are based on the “#status_id” field. Cases where it was
unknown whether water was flowing at the time of the visit were only added to
the denominator of the functionality estimate.
METHODOLOGY: FUNCTIONALITY BY AGE
Data was downloaded from the Water Point Data Exchange. All water points with
an installation year (#install_year) at least one year greater than the date of the
inventory (#report_date) were included. Water points with a functionality of
“unknown” were removed from the sample. The percentage of water points of a
given age that were functional (“yes” for #status_id) was captured for each age.
This information has been plotted below.
Conclusions and Next Steps
•Water point mapping data has experienced explosive growth in Africa
and Asia and bodes well for an Asset Management approach that is
common in urban water supply but is less common in rural.
•An average of 78% of water points are functional across the 11 countries
analyzed.
•The high failure rates early after installation are troubling: almost 15%
after one year and 25% of water points are non-functional by their
fourth year after installation. This indicates widespread problems with
poor quality water point installation, due to a range of problems that
may include professionalism and skills around contracts, construction
and supervision; borehole siting; lack of quality control of hardware; or
lack of post-construction monitoring and problem resolution.
•Handpumps are often singled out as technology that fails, but analysis of
other water point types show similar functionality levels, and that tens
of thousands of handpumps are providing a service.
•Additional data will help to provide a more robust analysis, and updated
data will allow for analysis of change over time and perhaps on different
metrics that are better indicators of service level quality.
Sources
Baumann, E. (2009). May-day! May-Day! Our handpumps are not working!. RWSN Perspective No 1, RWSN, St Gallen, Switzerland
Carter, R. C. and Ross, I. (2016) Beyond ‘functionality’ of handpump supplied rural water services in developing countries. Waterlines
DOI: 10.1021/es402086n.
Fisher, M. B., K. F. Shields, T. U. Chan, E. Christenson, R. D. Cronk, H. Leker, D. Samani, P. Apoya, A. Lutz, and J. Bartram (2015). Understanding
handpump sustainability: Determinants of rural water source functionality in the Greater Afram Plains region of Ghana. Water Resour. Res., 51,
8431–8449, doi:10.1002/2014WR016770.
Foster, T. (2013). Predictors of Sustainability for Community-Managed Handpumps in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Liberia, Sierra Leone, and
Uganda. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47 (21), pp 12037–12046.
Pearce, J, Greggio E., and Stephens E. (2015a). A Decade of WPM. RWSN: Mapping and Monitoring, RWSN.
Pearce, J, Greggio E., and Stephens E.(2015b). Failure and the Future. Water Point Mapping and Monitoring Series, RWSN.
Pearce, J, Greggio E., and Stephens E. (2015c). District Monitoring. Water Point Mapping and Monitoring Series, RWSN.
Pearce, J, Greggio E., and Stephens E.(2015d). National Monitoring. Water Point Mapping and Monitoring Series, RWSN.
RWSN (2009). Handpump Data 2009. Selected Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, RWSN, St Gallen, Switzerland.
RWSN (2015). Investment in rural water supply delivers results. Briefing note on key findings fr om the Joint Monitoring Programme 2015 report1
relating to rural water supply. RWSN, St Gallen, Switzerland.
RWSN Exec. Com. (2010). Myths of the Rural Water Supply Sector. RWSN Perspective No 4, RWSN, St Gallen, Switzerland.
UN (2016). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg6, (accessed 19.04.2016).
METHODOLOGY: FUNCTIONALITY BY TYPE
All water points were hand-coded as one of the water point types below based on
the value provided for the “#water_tech” field. The functionality for each type of
water point was based on the “#status_id” field. Records with a value of “unknown”
for this field were omitted. The six countries with the largest amount of data
available were included for this analysis.
Country* # of Water Points (2 years old) % Non-Functional
Sierra Leone
2,778 10
Afghanistan
4,134 17
Liberia
1,160 18
Uganda
8,660 22
Tanzania
1,246 27
*Data for the five countries with the most data on two-year-old water points is
included in this table All applicable data is included in the graph.
Poster by Brian Banks (Global Water Challenge) and Sean Furey (Skat Consulting Ltd.)
Brian.Banks@globalwaterchallenge.org Sean.Furey@skat.ch