- A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from American Psychologist
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Structural Stigma: Research Evidence and Implications for Psychological
Science
Mark L. Hatzenbuehler
Columbia University
Psychological research has provided essential insights into how stigma operates to disadvan-
tage those who are targeted by it. At the same time, stigma research has been criticized for
being too focused on the perceptions of stigmatized individuals and on microlevel
interactions, rather than attending to structural forms of stigma. This article describes the
relatively new field of research on structural stigma, which is defined as societal-level
conditions, cultural norms, and institutional policies that constrain the opportunities,
resources, and well-being of the stigmatized. I review emerging evidence that structural
stigma related to mental illness and sexual orientation (a) exerts direct and synergistic
effects on stigma processes that have long been the focus of psychological inquiry (e.g.,
concealment, rejection sensitivity), (b) serves as a contextual moderator of the efficacy
of psychological interventions, and (c) contributes to numerous adverse health outcomes
for members of stigmatized groups—ranging from dysregulated physiological stress
responses to premature mortality—indicating that structural stigma represents an under-
recognized mechanism producing health inequalities. Each of these pieces of evidence
suggests that structural stigma is relevant to psychology and therefore deserves the
attention of psychological scientists interested in understanding and ultimately reducing
the negative effects of stigma.
Keywords: stigma, social policies, sexual orientation, mental illness, health disparities
Psychologists have provided crucial insights into the ways in
which stigmatized individuals perceive and react to stigma as
well as the adverse consequences of stigma across several
important life domains, such as educational attainment and
health (Major & O’Brien, 2005). Despite these significant
advancements, stigma research has been criticized for being
too focused on individual and interpersonal processes, thereby
overlooking broader, structural forms of stigma (Link &
Phelan, 2001). Although this criticism largely emanates from
other disciplines, psychologists themselves have argued
that more attention should be paid to structural issues that
influence the stigma process (e.g., Fiske, 1998). In the
last decade, psychologists have responded to this charge
by conducting theoretical and empirical research on the
role of structural stigma in shaping the lives of the
stigmatized.
This article reviews the relatively new field of research on
structural stigma as it relates to mental illness and sexual
orientation through addressing four specific issues: (1) defining
structural stigma and discussing various measurement ap-
proaches that have been employed to study it, (2) evaluating
evidence bearing on the important consequences of struc-
tural stigma for individual-level stigma processes (e.g.,
concealment, rejection sensitivity), for psychological in-
terventions and for health inequalities, (3) describing
how the field has addressed the challenge of establishing
causal inferences regarding associations between struc-
tural stigma and health, and (4) outlining future direc-
tions to advance this emerging literature.
What Is Structural Stigma, and How
Is It Measured?
Stigma exists at individual, interpersonal, and structural
levels (Link & Phelan, 2001). Individual stigma refers to the
psychological processes in which individuals engage in
Editor’s note. Mark L. Hatzenbuehler received the 2016 APA Award
for Distinguished Early Career Contributions to Psychology in the Public
Interest. This article is based on his invited presentation at the 124th
Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, held Au-
gust 4 –7, 2016, in Denver, Colorado.
Author’s note. Mark L. Hatzenbuehler, Department of Sociomedical
Sciences, Center for the Study of Social Inequalities and Health, Mailman
School of Public Health, Columbia University.
Research on this article was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant K01DA032558.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mark L.
Hatzenbuehler, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Univer-
sity, Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th Street, Room
549.B, New York, NY 10032. E-mail: mlh2101@cumc.columbia.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
American Psychologist © 2016 American Psychological Association
2016, Vol. 71, No. 8, 742–751 0003-066X/16/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000068
742