ArticlePublisher preview availableLiterature Review

Structural Stigma: Research Evidence and Implications for Psychological Science

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Psychological research has provided essential insights into how stigma operates to disadvantage those who are targeted by it. At the same time, stigma research has been criticized for being too focused on the perceptions of stigmatized individuals and on microlevel interactions, rather than attending to structural forms of stigma. This article describes the relatively new field of research on structural stigma, which is defined as societal-level conditions, cultural norms, and institutional policies that constrain the opportunities, resources, and well-being of the stigmatized. I review emerging evidence that structural stigma related to mental illness and sexual orientation (a) exerts direct and synergistic effects on stigma processes that have long been the focus of psychological inquiry (e.g., concealment, rejection sensitivity), (b) serves as a contextual moderator of the efficacy of psychological interventions, and (c) contributes to numerous adverse health outcomes for members of stigmatized groups—ranging from dysregulated physiological stress responses to premature mortality—indicating that structural stigma represents an underrecognized mechanism producing health inequalities. Each of these pieces of evidence suggests that structural stigma is relevant to psychology and therefore deserves the attention of psychological scientists interested in understanding and ultimately reducing the negative effects of stigma.
Structural Stigma: Research Evidence and Implications for Psychological
Science
Mark L. Hatzenbuehler
Columbia University
Psychological research has provided essential insights into how stigma operates to disadvan-
tage those who are targeted by it. At the same time, stigma research has been criticized for
being too focused on the perceptions of stigmatized individuals and on microlevel
interactions, rather than attending to structural forms of stigma. This article describes the
relatively new field of research on structural stigma, which is defined as societal-level
conditions, cultural norms, and institutional policies that constrain the opportunities,
resources, and well-being of the stigmatized. I review emerging evidence that structural
stigma related to mental illness and sexual orientation (a) exerts direct and synergistic
effects on stigma processes that have long been the focus of psychological inquiry (e.g.,
concealment, rejection sensitivity), (b) serves as a contextual moderator of the efficacy
of psychological interventions, and (c) contributes to numerous adverse health outcomes
for members of stigmatized groups—ranging from dysregulated physiological stress
responses to premature mortality—indicating that structural stigma represents an under-
recognized mechanism producing health inequalities. Each of these pieces of evidence
suggests that structural stigma is relevant to psychology and therefore deserves the
attention of psychological scientists interested in understanding and ultimately reducing
the negative effects of stigma.
Keywords: stigma, social policies, sexual orientation, mental illness, health disparities
Psychologists have provided crucial insights into the ways in
which stigmatized individuals perceive and react to stigma as
well as the adverse consequences of stigma across several
important life domains, such as educational attainment and
health (Major & O’Brien, 2005). Despite these significant
advancements, stigma research has been criticized for being
too focused on individual and interpersonal processes, thereby
overlooking broader, structural forms of stigma (Link &
Phelan, 2001). Although this criticism largely emanates from
other disciplines, psychologists themselves have argued
that more attention should be paid to structural issues that
influence the stigma process (e.g., Fiske, 1998). In the
last decade, psychologists have responded to this charge
by conducting theoretical and empirical research on the
role of structural stigma in shaping the lives of the
stigmatized.
This article reviews the relatively new field of research on
structural stigma as it relates to mental illness and sexual
orientation through addressing four specific issues: (1) defining
structural stigma and discussing various measurement ap-
proaches that have been employed to study it, (2) evaluating
evidence bearing on the important consequences of struc-
tural stigma for individual-level stigma processes (e.g.,
concealment, rejection sensitivity), for psychological in-
terventions and for health inequalities, (3) describing
how the field has addressed the challenge of establishing
causal inferences regarding associations between struc-
tural stigma and health, and (4) outlining future direc-
tions to advance this emerging literature.
What Is Structural Stigma, and How
Is It Measured?
Stigma exists at individual, interpersonal, and structural
levels (Link & Phelan, 2001). Individual stigma refers to the
psychological processes in which individuals engage in
Editor’s note. Mark L. Hatzenbuehler received the 2016 APA Award
for Distinguished Early Career Contributions to Psychology in the Public
Interest. This article is based on his invited presentation at the 124th
Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, held Au-
gust 4 –7, 2016, in Denver, Colorado.
Author’s note. Mark L. Hatzenbuehler, Department of Sociomedical
Sciences, Center for the Study of Social Inequalities and Health, Mailman
School of Public Health, Columbia University.
Research on this article was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant K01DA032558.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mark L.
Hatzenbuehler, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Univer-
sity, Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th Street, Room
549.B, New York, NY 10032. E-mail: mlh2101@cumc.columbia.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
American Psychologist © 2016 American Psychological Association
2016, Vol. 71, No. 8, 742–751 0003-066X/16/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000068
742
... Limited research has examined the influence of macrolevel factors, such as state-level gender identity-specific laws and policies, on transgender health disparities [16,26,27]. Consideration of structural stigma (i.e., laws and institutional policies that intentionally or unintentionally constrain resources and opportunities) is critical, as they can impact the wellbeing of stigmatized populations [22,28]. The absence of protective policies or the presence of discriminatory policies contribute to an architecture of exclusion that produces and reinforces social inequities, and magnifies health disparities. ...
... Our study is the first to integrate state-level policy data related to gender minority populations as a measure of structural stigma in tobacco use research. Prior work has demonstrated how structural stigma can influence health behaviors and magnify health disparities [28,50] and that exposure to structural stigma is a potential risk factor for smoking among transgender populations [6]. Our study found that in some cases, improvements in gender minority-related policies reduced the risk of nicotine/tobacco use for all individuals by 20%. ...
Article
Background and Purpose Our study examined individual-, interpersonal-, community-, and policy-level associations with nicotine/tobacco use among gender-varying and gender-stable U.S. individuals. Methods Data from Waves 2–4 (2014/15–2016/18) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (n = 33,197 U.S. adolescents and adults aged ≥14 years) and state-level gender minority policy data were used. Using multivariable logistic regression, the odds of past-30-day nicotine/tobacco use at W4 were estimated as a function of gender stability/variability, psychological distress, number of tobacco products used by family/friends, anti-tobacco marketing exposure, and change in gender minority-related policies from 2015 to 2017. Results Gender-varying individuals had higher odds of nicotine/tobacco use compared with gender-stable individuals (AOR range = 1.7–2.3, p < .01). In the overall sample, positive change in gender minority policy protections (tallied from medium to high) was associated with lower odds of any nicotine/tobacco, other tobacco, and poly-tobacco use (AOR = 0.8, p < .05) compared to states with no change in their negative policies. Anti-tobacco marketing exposure was associated with lower odds of any tobacco, cigarette, e-cigarette, and poly-tobacco use compared with those who had no anti-tobacco marketing exposure (AOR = 0.9, p < .05). Higher psychological distress (AOR range = 1.7–2.4, p < .001) and an increasing number of tobacco products used by family/friends (AOR range = 1.1–1.3, p < .001) were associated with increased odds of nicotine/tobacco use. Conclusions Multilevel prevention and intervention strategies are needed to reduce the risk of nicotine/tobacco use among gender-varying and gender-stable individuals.
... Intrapersonal and interpersonal stigma relate to public perceptions and related social responses towards stereotypes and negative attitudes about various stigmatized identities [12]. Structural stigma comprises the results of organizational activities and policies that create and maintain social inequalities for people with stigmatized identities-examples which include the underfunding of certain healthcare services, promotion of cultural norms that discourage identification with certain identities, and practices that systematically create and maintain inequities to accessing services and care [13]. Given that stigmas across multiple levels are recognized as a major barrier to HIV prevention efforts [14][15][16], they have become the target of a growing number of interventions seeking to improve PrEP uptake and adherence [17]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective for reducing risk of HIV transmission, stigma persists as a barrier to HIV prevention. Digital technologies present opportunities to access hard-to-reach populations and increase the efficiency of established interventions. This review examines current digital interventions addressing stigma to improve PrEP-related outcomes. Digital technologies are increasingly used for HIV prevention and include a wide range of formats. Recent interventions focused on stigma and PrEP tend to engage mobile phone-related technology and focus on younger populations with particular attention to men who have sex with men and transgender women. Digital interventions that address stigma are promising for improving PrEP-related outcomes. No single technology currently demonstrates consistent superiority. Limited access to PrEP and heightened stigma in under-resourced countries present challenges for interventions supporting diverse communities. Further research should examine how digital interventions can reduce stigma beyond the individual level to enhance PrEP use and explore opportunities to improve and integrate approaches to stigma measurement.
... These repercussions include an increased likelihood of concealing one's sexual orientation or HIV/AIDS status, elevated rates of self-stigmatization and perceived discrimination, and its interaction with individual-level stigma predicting substance use, such as tobacco and alcohol consumption. Hatzenbuehler (2016) further highlights the severe health implications stemming from structural stigma. Notably, disparities in psychiatric morbidity related to sexual orientation are more pronounced in societies with heightened levels of structural stigma. ...
Article
Full-text available
Structural stigma assumes a central role in shaping both individual and interpersonal processes of stigma, while also contributing to health disparities . The recognition of the right to marry serves as a critical benchmark for evaluating a society's commitment to eliminating this structural stigma that affects marginalized groups. The legal sanctioning of same-sex marriage can serve as a protective macro-environmental factor with substantial implications for the psychological well-being and health of same-sex couples. Previous research has predominantly explored how LGBTQ+ individuals make sense of the legalization of same-sex marriage, but it has generally neglected to examine variations across different age cohorts. Also, discussions regarding the impact of same-sex marriage legalization in non-Western contexts remain conspicuously underdeveloped. The present study seeks to bridge these gaps by centering its investigation on Taiwan as the research site and exploring the influence of same-sex marriage legalization on the stigma experienced by lesbians of marriageable age.
... Stigma itself is a unique stressor and leads to psychological distress as the culmination of having a devalued social identity (Hatzenbuehler et al., 2009), including those suffering from dementia and MCI. The relationship between stigma, stress, and psychological distress has been well-supported (i.e., Hatzenbuehler et al., 2009;Hatzenbuehler and McLaughlin, 2014;Hatzenbuehler, 2016;Pachankis et al., 2018;McCleary-Gaddy et al., 2019). Hatzenbuehler et al. (2009) aimed to examine emotion regulation strategies related to stigma-related psychological distress. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction While Alzheimer’s disease and other causes of dementia have rapidly become a global health crisis with growing incidence that is unabated, the incidence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) far exceeds that of Alzheimer’s disease. Persons with MCI demonstrate some level of cognitive impairment, but daily functions remain intact and there is no certainty that they will develop dementia. Yet, the possibility conjures a considerable amount of fear and anxiety, further fueled by a vast array of misconceptions and stigma. The pervasive nature of this stigma permeates society and culture at many levels. Persons with MCI who are at higher risk for development of dementia may be especially vulnerable to fear and stigma associated with the diagnosis. Based on this premise, the primary aim of this study was to examine the relationship between perceived stigma and perceived stress in persons with MCI and their care partners, including the relationship between income and the study variables. The secondary aim was to examine the effect of a combined cognitive rehabilitation and wellness program on these perceptions. Methods Thirty participants were recruited from Mayo Clinic’s Health Action to Benefit Independence and Thinking (HABIT) program. MCI ( n = 15) and care partner ( n = 15) participants completed the Stigma Impact Scale (SIS) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) before and after the HABIT program. Results Average SIS and PSS scores decreased in the MCI, care partner, and combined groups, both pre- and post-HABIT. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between perceived stigma and stress, controlling for income. A significant relationship was found between perceived stigma and perceived stress both pre and post-HABIT. Discussion The results suggest a relationship exists between perceived stigma and perceived stress in persons with MCI and their care partners, and an educational program such as HABIT may strengthen this relationship by informing participants of potential challenges that occur in cognitive decline. Understanding these relationships may provide an opportunity to provide tools for this vulnerable population.
Article
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships among the political leanings of a state, the state-level implicit and explicit biases against transgender people, and the presence of transgender athlete bans. The authors collected archival data from 2021 and 2022 bans in the United States to examine the hypotheses. As of 2022, 18 states had passed laws barring transgender athletes from participating in sports. Results from regression analyses showed that conservative-leaning states were more likely to enact transgender athlete bans than their peers. The relationship was mediated by explicit (but not implicit) bias toward transgender people. The findings have implications for research and practice. Sport managers have an opportunity to create transgender-inclusive workplaces for staff, coaches, and other managers. They should also work with campus counselors and other staff to ensure that transgender athletes have ample support.
Article
Purpose: If PK12 administrators aspire to interrupt bias-based bullying, they need to understand their role in perpetuating structural and social inequality. The purpose of this study was to examine administrators’: 1) awareness of gender-based bullying, 2) initial intentions to address bullying, and 3) actions that interrupted or perpetuated gender-based bullying. Methods: This qualitative study used a purposeful sample U.S. court cases and 36 interviews with administrators and policy consultants to explore PK12 leaders’ understanding of gender-based bullying and actions to disrupt bullying. Findings: Our findings provide a more expansive definition of administrative bullying and brings attention to the personal complicity of educational leaders in perpetuating gender-based bullying. Administrators in this study modeled support for bullying through each of these four types of bullying – by direct action, facilitated support, accommodating external stakeholders, and resisting efforts to educate themselves or others on issues related to gender-based bullying. All of these approaches allow bias and bullying to continue. The study also reveals how some leaders interrupt bullying by collaborating with students, parents, and community-based organizations. Implications: Policymakers, leadership preparation instructors, and PK12 administrators may be interested in how administrative behaviors perpetuate gender-based bullying. A lack of knowledge about leaders’ personal complicity in bullying and about gender-diversity fundamentally interrupts two of the main roles of PK-12 leaders: implementing policies and leading instructional practices. The results of the study suggest the need for additional policies, procedures, and training to support leaders committed to interrupting gender-based bullying.
Article
Introduction More than 70% of new HIV diagnoses in the United States were among men who have sex with men (MSM) in 2019. Pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a transformative innovation for reducing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Structural stigma against sexual minorities, including in the form of state‐level policies, may affect PrEP implementation. We evaluated whether lower structural stigma reflected by earlier year of state same‐sex marriage legalization was associated with increased male PrEP prescriptions and male PrEP‐to‐need ratio (PnR), a ratio of PrEP prescriptions to new HIV diagnoses. Methods We used 2012−2019 AIDSVu data on male PrEP prescriptions and male PnR in each US state and year. We used generalized estimating equations to evaluate the relationship between the timing of implementing state same‐sex marriage policies and the outcomes of male PrEP prescriptions per 100,000 people and the male PnR. We adjusted for calendar year, Medicaid expansion and the political party of the governor in each state. Results State implementation of same‐sex marriage policies in earlier, relative to later, periods was associated with increases in the rate of male PrEP prescriptions and in the male PnR. Specifically, implementing state same‐sex marriage policies between 2004 and 2011 and between 2012 and 2013 were each associated with greater rates of male PrEP prescriptions relative to implementing same‐sex marriage policies between 2014 and 2015. Implementing state same‐sex marriage policies between 2004 and 2011 as well as between 2012 and 2013 were both significantly associated with a greater male PnR relative to implementing same‐sex marriage policies between 2014 and 2015. By 2019, the difference in male PrEP prescriptions was 137.9 (97.3−175.5) per 100,000 in states that implemented same‐sex marriage in 2004−2011 and 27.2 (23.3−30.5) per 100,000 in states that implemented same‐sex marriage from 2012 to 2013, relative to states that implemented same‐sex marriage in 2014−2015. Conclusions Earlier implementation of state same‐sex marriage policies was associated with greater rates of male PrEP prescriptions. Reducing state‐level structural stigma may improve HIV prevention among MSM in the United States.
Technical Report
Full-text available
This report summarizes what is known about mental illness-related structural stigma. It begins with an overview of the concepts of stigma and structural stigma, including how they are understood by contemporary scholars. The report then outlines the different ways in which structural stigma manifests in modern institutional systems and social contexts, including: healthcare; employment and income; housing; education; criminal justice; privacy; public participation; travel and immigration; media; and reproduction and parenting. It is apparent there are few areas of social policy affecting people with mental illnesses that remain untainted by stigma. The final sections of the report synthesize the existing knowledge pertaining to addressing structural stigma. The most promising methods involve a combination of legal and policy action, advocacy, inclusive efforts, healthcare reform, education, and research.
Article
Full-text available
In this article the author reviews research evidence on the prevalence of mental disorders in lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (LGBs) and shows, using meta-analyses, that LGBs have a higher prevalence of mental disorders than heterosexuals. The author offers a conceptual framework for understanding this excess in prevalence of disorder in terms of minority stress— explaining that stigma, prejudice, and discrimination create a hostile and stressful social environment that causes mental health problems. The model describes stress processes, including the experience of prejudice events, expectations of rejection, hiding and concealing, internalized homophobia, and ameliorative coping processes. This conceptual framework is the basis for the review of research evidence, suggestions for future research directions, and exploration of public policy implications.
Article
Full-text available
Substantial country-level variation exists in prejudiced attitudes towards male homosexuality and in the extent to which countries promote the unequal treatment of MSM through discriminatory laws. The impact and underlying mechanisms of country-level stigma on odds of diagnosed HIV, sexual opportunities, and experience of HIV-prevention services, needs and behaviours have rarely been examined, however. Data come from the European MSM Internet Survey (EMIS), which was administered between June and August 2010 across 38 European countries (N = 174 209). Country-level stigma was assessed using a combination of national laws and policies affecting sexual minorities and a measure of attitudes held by the citizens of each country. We also assessed concealment, HIV status, number of past 12-month male sex partners, and eight HIV-preventive services, knowledge, and behavioural outcomes. MSM living in countries with higher levels of stigma had reduced odds of diagnosed HIV and fewer partners but higher odds of sexual risk behaviour, unmet prevention needs, not using testing services, and not discussing their sexuality in testing services. Sexual orientation concealment mediated associations between country-level stigma and these outcomes. Country-level stigma may have historically limited HIV transmission opportunities among MSM, but by restricting MSM's public visibility, it also reduces MSM's ability to access HIV-preventive services, knowledge and precautionary behaviours. These findings suggest that MSM in European countries with high levels of stigma are vulnerable to HIV infection. Although they have less opportunity to identify and contact other MSM, this might change with emerging technologies.
Article
Full-text available
Racial disparities in health are well-documented and represent a significant public health concern in the US. Racism-related factors contribute to poorer health and higher mortality rates among Blacks compared to other racial groups. However, methods to measure racism and monitor its associations with health at the population-level have remained elusive. In this study, we investigated the utility of a previously developed Internet search-based proxy of area racism as a predictor of Black mortality rates. Area racism was the proportion of Google searches containing the "N-word" in 196 designated market areas (DMAs). Negative binomial regression models were specified taking into account individual age, sex, year of death, and Census region and adjusted to the 2000 US standard population to examine the association between area racism and Black mortality rates, which were derived from death certificates and mid-year population counts collated by the National Center for Health Statistics (2004-2009). DMAs characterized by a one standard deviation greater level of area racism were associated with an 8.2% increase in the all-cause Black mortality rate, equivalent to over 30,000 deaths annually. The magnitude of this effect was attenuated to 5.7% after adjustment for DMA-level demographic and Black socioeconomic covariates. A model controlling for the White mortality rate was used to further adjust for unmeasured confounders that influence mortality overall in a geographic area, and to examine Black-White disparities in the mortality rate. Area racism remained significantly associated with the all-cause Black mortality rate (mortality rate ratio = 1.036; 95% confidence interval = 1.015, 1.057; p = 0.001). Models further examining cause-specific Black mortality rates revealed significant associations with heart disease, cancer, and stroke. These findings are congruent with studies documenting the deleterious impact of racism on health among Blacks. Our study contributes to evidence that racism shapes patterns in mortality and generates racial disparities in health.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: We sought to understand how local immigration enforcement policies affect the utilization of health services among immigrant Hispanics/Latinos in North Carolina. Methods: In 2012, we analyzed vital records data to determine whether local implementation of section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Secure Communities program, which authorizes local law enforcement agencies to enforce federal immigration laws, affected the prenatal care utilization of Hispanics/Latinas. We also conducted 6 focus groups and 17 interviews with Hispanic/Latino persons across North Carolina to explore the impact of immigration policies on their utilization of health services. Results: We found no significant differences in utilization of prenatal care before and after implementation of section 287(g), but we did find that, in individual-level analysis, Hispanic/Latina mothers sought prenatal care later and had inadequate care when compared with non-Hispanic/Latina mothers. Participants reported profound mistrust of health services, avoiding health services, and sacrificing their health and the health of their family members. Conclusions: Fear of immigration enforcement policies is generalized across counties. Interventions are needed to increase immigrant Hispanics/Latinos' understanding of their rights and eligibility to utilize health services. Policy-level initiatives are also needed (e.g., driver's licenses) to help undocumented persons access and utilize these services.
Article
Social science research on stigma has grown dramatically over the past two decades, particularly in social psychology, where researchers have elucidated the ways in which people construct cognitive categories and link those categories to stereotyped beliefs. In the midst of this growth, the stigma concept has been criticized as being too vaguely defined and individually focused. In response to these criticisms, we define stigma as the co-occurrence of its components-labeling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination-and further indicate that for stigmatization to occur, power must be exercised. The stigma concept we construct has implications for understanding several core issues in stigma research, ranging from the definition of the concept to the reasons stigma sometimes represents a very persistent predicament in the lives of persons affected by it. Finally, because there are so many stigmatized circumstances and because stigmatizing processes can affect multiple domains of people's lives, stigmatization probably has a dramatic bearing on the distribution of life chances in such areas as earnings, housing, criminal involvement, health, and life itself. It follows that social scientists who are interested in understanding the distribution of such life chances should also be interested in stigma.
Article
This paper hypothesizes that official labeling gives personal relevance to an individual's beliefs about how others respond to mental patients. According to this view, people develop conceptions of what others think of mental patients long before they become patients. These conceptions include the belief that others devalue and discriminate against mental patients. When people enter psychiatric treatment and are labeled, these beliefs become personally applicable and lead to self-devaluation and/or the fear of rejection by others. Such reactions may have negative effects on both psychological and social functioning. This hypothesis was tested by comparing samples of community residents and psychiatric patients from the Washington Heights section of New York city. Five groups were formed (1) first-treatment contact patients, (2) repeat-treatment contact patients, (3) formerly treated community residents, (4) untreated community cases, and (5) community residents with no evidence of severe psychopathology. These groups were administered a scale that measured beliefs that mental patients would be devalued and discriminated against by most people. Scores on this scale were associated with demoralization, income loss, and unemployment in labeled groups but not in unlabeled groups. The results suggest that labeling may produce negative outcomes like those specified by the classic concept of secondary deviance.