Introduction to the Psychology of self-esteem

Full text

In: Self-Esteem ISBN: 978-1-53610-294-9
Editor: Franklin Holloway © 2016 Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION TO THE PSYCHOLOGY
OF SELF-ESTEEM
Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek*
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts,
University of Alexandria, Egypt
ABSTRACT
Self--esteem is a central construct in clinical, developmental,
personality, and social psychology. Its role in psychological functioning
has been studied for more than a century. Self-esteem construct has
spawned a research literature of such magnitude and richness that it is
impossible to summarize. Therefore, the aim of the present chapter was to
highlight the main topics in this domain. That is, the self-esteem
definition, dimensionality, and components; its formation and
development, and assessment; the positive and negative effects of both
high and low self-esteem, the association between low self-esteem and
psychopathology especially depression, the dark side of high self-esteem
(e.g., narcissism); and the terror-management as an important theory of
self-esteem. Then, self-esteem and both culture and demographic
variables associations were reviewed, and the stability of self esteem. At
last, a suggested solution to remedy the problem of social desirability in
responding to the self-esteem scales was proposed.
* Email: aabdel-khalek@hotmail.com.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
2
Keywords: Self-esteem, psychopathology, depression, narcissism, terror-
management theory, culture.
Through the short history of psychology, few personality constructs have
received greater theoretical and empirical attention than self-esteem. In 2004,
Heine and Lehman stated that over 18,000 studies investigating self-esteem
have been published over the past 35 years (this is a rate of more than one
publication per day!). Meanwhile, psychologists interest in self-esteem has
grown exponentially over the years. Research on self-esteem has had a long
prolific history in psychology.
Self-esteem is a central construct in clinical, developmental, personality,
and social psychology, and its role in psychological functioning has been
studied for nearly a century (Greenier, Kernis and Waschull, 1995). Self-
esteem significance is often exaggerated to the extent that low self-esteem is
viewed as the cause of all evil and high self-esteem as the cause of all good
(Manning, Bear and Minke, 2006). In a similar vein, Hewitt (2002) stated that
the conventional approach to self-esteem has spawned a research literature of
such magnitude and richness that it is impossible to summarize. Therefore, the
aim of the present chapter was to highlight the main topics in the self-esteem
huge literature.
Everyone, must love himself or herself above or at least in equal measure
to any other person or thing. This would explain the golden rule found in most
religions, to “love others as you love yourself”. The coincidence among
different cultures and religions regarding this essential bit of wisdom, to treat
and love others, as you would have them treat and love you, is nevertheless
surprising (Dolan, 2007, p. 50).
DEFINITION OF SELF–ESTEEM
Rosenberg (1965), one of the pioneers in this domain, stated that self-
esteem refers to an individual overall positive evaluation to the self. He added,
that high self-esteem consists of an individual respecting himself and
considering himself worthy. In a similar vein, Sedikides and Gress (2003)
stated that self-esteem refers to individual’s perception or subjective appraisal
of one’s own self-worth, one’s feelings of self-respect and self-confidence and
the extent to which the individual holds positive or negative views about self.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
3
Self-esteem is related to personal beliefs about skills, abilities, and social
relationships.
Self-esteem is also defined as a global barometer of self-evaluation
involving cognitive appraisals about general self-worth and affective
experiences of the self that are linked to these global appraisals (Murphy,
Stosny and Morrel, 2005). By the same token, Wang and Ollendick (2001)
stated that self-esteem involves an evaluation of oneself followed by an
emotional reaction towards oneself. The evaluative and affective elements are
present in all extant definitions and theories of self-esteem.
Brown, Dutton, and Cook (2001) distinguished three ways in which the
term “self-esteem” is used: (a) global or trait self-esteem to refer to the way
people characteristically feel about themselves, i.e., feelings of affection for
oneself; (b) self-evaluation to refer to the way people evaluate their various
abilities and attributes, and (c) feelings of self-esteem to refer to momentary
emotional states, e.g., a person might say her self-esteem was sky-high after
getting a big promotion, or a person might say his self-esteem plummeted after
a divorce.
Perhaps the simplest definition of self-esteem is found in Webster’s
dictionary, which says that “self-esteem is satisfaction with oneself”. In
another edition of the same dictionary, self-esteem means “one’s good opinion
of one’s dignity or worth”.
Hewitt (2002) sought to transform our view of self-esteem from a
universal psychological trait and motivating force to a socially constructed
emotion grounded in mood. This point of view was based on Smith – Lovin’s
(1995) definition of self-esteem as a reflexive emotion that has developed over
time in social processes of invention, that individuals learn to experience and
to talk about, that arises in predictable social circumstances, and that is subject
to social control.
For the purpose of the present chapter, self-esteem could be defined as the
self-evaluation and descriptive conceptualization that individuals make and
maintain with regard to themselves.
DIMENSIONALITY AND THE COMPONENTS
OF SELF-ESTEEM
Self-esteem can refer to the overall self or to specific aspects of the self,
such as how people feel about their social standing, racial or ethnic group,
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
4
physical features, athletic skills, job or school performance. Theorists have
made many distinctions concerning different types of self-esteem, e.g.,
contingent vs. noncontingent; explicit vs. implicit; authentic vs. false; stable
vs. unstable; global vs. domain specific. Regarding the dimensionality of self-
esteem, some authors conceptualized it as a unitary global trait, whereas others
view it as a multidimensional trait with independent subcomponents
(performance, social, and physical self-esteem) (Heatherton and Wyland,
2003).
Branden (1969) maintained that self-esteem consists of two components:
(a) to consider oneself effective, to trust in one’s ability to think, learn, choose
and make correct decisions, and to overcome challenges and produce changes,
and (b) to respect oneself, the confidence in one’s right to be happy, and the
confidence that people are worthy of the respect, love and self-fulfillment
appearing in their lives. More recently, Reasoner (2005) viewed self-esteem as
composed of two distinct dimensions: competence and worth. On the basis of
these two components, he defines self-esteem as “the experience of being
capable of meeting life challenges and being worthy of happiness”.
In personality psychology, there is a well-known distinction between traits
and states first introduced by Cattell (1966) and elaborated by Spielberger and
his colleagues (1983). Based on this distinction, some authors distinguished
between trait self-esteem, i.e., stable in time as it is a part of the personality
and the state self-esteem, which is more labile, being affected by events,
situations, and emotions (Gilovich, Keltner and Nisbett, 2006).
Deci and Ryan (1995) distinguished between contingent and true self-
esteem. Contingent self-esteem refers to feelings about oneself that result
from, and dependent on, matching some standards of excellence or living up to
some interpersonal or intrapsychic expectations. It is a kind of aggrandizement
of oneself associated with being ego-involved in some types of outcomes and
dutifully achieving them. it is often involves social comparison and tends to be
associated with a kind of narcissism. In contrast, true self-esteem is more
stable and based in a solid and secure sense of self. Their worth would be an
integrated aspect of one’s self and would be reflected in agency, proactivity,
and vitality.
As for the assessment of self-esteem, some authors distinguished between
explicit self-esteem (questionnaires) and implicit self-esteem, i.e., the
introspectively unidentified (or inaccurately identified) effect of the self-
attitude on evaluation of self-associated and self-dissociated object
(Greenwald and Banaji, 1995).
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
5
THE FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF SELF-ESTEEM
The formation of self-esteem implies a long process. It is correlated with
the formation of self-image and self-conscience. Its evolution in time involves
also downfall periods especially during transition periods from one stage to
another, from one status to another, e.g., in adolescence (due to the psycho-
somatic changes), or grand age, as a consequence of the change in status,
retirement and the change in tasks and responsibilities (Orth, Trzesniewski and
Robins, 2010). While self-esteem appears to decline during adolescence, it
increases during young adulthood (Tsai, Ying and Lee, 2001).
The affective model of self-esteem development assumes that: (a) self-
esteem forms early in life in response to relational and temperamental factors;
and (b) once formed, endows high self-esteem people with the ability to
promote, protect and restore feelings of self-worth (Brown et al., 2001).
Many studies have underlined the essential role of the family environment
in the formation of personality especially in the early childhood (Talib,
Mohamad and Mamat, 2011). Early studies by Rosenberg (1965) and
Coopersmith (1967) showed that parental involvement and willingness to give
adolescents autonomy and freedom are positively correlated to high self-
esteem in adolescents.
The period of adolescence is important for the process of self-esteem
formation. The formation of self-esteem can be stimulated, encouraged both
by parents and teachers. The level of self-esteem is mirrored in the
adolescent’s attitude and behavior, both at home and at school (Mogonea and
Mogonea, 2014). The adolescents with a high level of self-esteem have the
following characteristics: they are capable of influencing positively the
opinion and behavior of others; they tackle new situations positively and
confidently; they have a high level of tolerance towards frustration; they
accept early responsibilities, they asses correctly situations; they communicate
positive feelings about themselves; they succeed in having a good self-control
and the belief that the things they are undergoing are the result of their own
behavior and actions (Lavoie, 2012). Therefore, adolescence is the critical
period for the development of self-esteem and self-identity, and low self-
esteem may endanger adolescent’s emotional regulation (Lin, Tang, Yen, Ko,
Huang, Liu et al., 2008). On the other hand, high self-esteem serving as a role
of resilience or positive adaptation (Moksnes and Espnes, 2012).
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
6
ASSESSING SELF-ESTEEM
There are many measures of self-esteem, i.e., state and trait; explicit and
implicit; uni- and – multi-dimensional scales. Because the Rosenberg scale is
the most widely measure in research (Blascovich and Tomaka, 1991), and it is
the most widely used measure of global self-esteem (Heatherton and Wyland,
2003), as well as other advantages, it is the scale of choice to introduce here.
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (1965, 1987) (See Table 1)
It is the most popular measure of global self-esteem. Indeed, it is the
standard with which developers of other measures usually seek convergence. It
is unidimensional scale and face valid. It contains only 10 Likert type items
contributes to ease of administration, scoring, and interpretation. The
measure’s relatively high internal consistency and test-retest reliability
undoubtedly contribute to its popularity. Possible susceptibility to social
desirability effects has not dampened its use, probably because of similar
problems with other scales. Although originally developed for use with
adolescents, this scale is also used widely with adults (Blascovich and
Tomaka, 1991).
Table 1. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
1- Strongly Agree 2- Agree 3- Disagree 4- Strongly Disagree
1- I feel that I am a person of worth, at least on an equal basis with others.
2- I feel that I have a number of good qualities.
3- All in all, I am inclined to feel that I am a failure. *
4- I am able to do things as well as most other people.
5- I feel I do not have much to be proud of. *
6- I take a positive attitude toward myself.
7- On the whole, I am satisfied with myself.
8- I wish I could have more respect for myself. *
9- I certainly feel useless at times. *
10- At times I think I am no good at all. *
* Reverse-scored item
Note- many researchers change the 4-point scale to 5
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
7
Schmitt and Allik (2005) stated that the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale has
been translated into 28 languages. They administered this scale to 16, 998
participants across 53 nations, and found that the factor structure of the scale
was largely invariant across nations. Its scores correlated with neuroticism,
extraversion, and romantic attachment styles within nearly all nations,
providing additional support for cross-cultural equivalence of the scale. The
negatively worded items were interpreted differently across nations.
However, there are many critics of the Rosenberg scale. Some consider it
too short, too obvious, unrealistically unitary, and fails to predict behavior
effectively (Baumeister, 1994). Moreover, Carmines and Zeller (1974)
identified separate “positive” and “negative” factors related to the items
worded in a positive direction and the items that worded in the negative
direction, respectively, thereby suggesting response set.
Cheng and Hamid (1995) pointed out to a problem in translating the
Rosenberg’s (1965) Self-esteem Scale into Chinese. That is, the negatively
phrased item number 8: “I wish I could have more respect for myself”, was
syntactically problematic in Chinese. When this item was translated into
Chinese, it could imply either that (a) the person already has adequate self-
esteem, yet wishes to have more or (b) the person has little respect for himself
and would like more. The same problem is relevant in the Arabic language.
For this reason, the five negatively phrased items converted to positively
worded in the Arabic translated version (See: Abdel-Khalek, 2007; Abdel-
Khalek, Korayem and El-Nayal, 2012).
The main problem in self-esteem questionnairses, including the Rosenberg
scale, is the social desirability, i.e., the defensive self-esteem, denying personal
problems and inadequacies, and making a false good impression.
POSITIVE EFFECTS OF HIGH SELF-ESTEEM
The self-esteem is a personality trait related with the self-image and self-
conscience concepts. All personality traits, including self-esteem, could be
viewed as a continuum or a bipolar dimension. Individual differences through
this continuum encompass several grades and levels. Self-approval is a basic
human desire. High self-esteem score is a must factor in order to attain the
feeling of happiness.
Studies have identified self-esteem as an important determinant of
emotional well-being (Baumeister, Campbell, Krueger and Vohs, 2003). As
early as 1890, William James, one of the founding fathers of Western
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
8
psychology, argued that self-esteem is an important aspect of mental health.
People with high self-esteem experience more happiness, optimism, and
motivation than those with low self-esteem, as well as less depression, anxiety,
and negative mood.
Using several Arab participants, it was found that self-esteem significantly
and positively associated with love of life, mental health, satisfaction with life,
happiness, and hope (Abdel-Khalek, 2007, 2011, 2012, 2013, Abdel-Khalek
and Snyder, 2007). Persons with high self-esteem are more likely to persist in
the face of difficult tasks than are low self-esteem persons (Baumeister et al.,
2003). High self-esteem people are more resilient to the vicissitudes of life.
A high level of self-esteem supplies individuals with the ability to accept
happy moments, to handle unpleasant situations, to cope effectively with
challenges, to engage in close relationships and to improve their strengths.
High self-esteem is also considered to positively moderate the expression of
dysfunctional schemata and depressive symptoms at the experience of
negative life events (Stavropoulos, Lazaratou, Marini and Dikeos, 2015).
Several studies have found that high self-esteem individuals are more
persistent in the face of failure than the low self-esteem individuals. High self-
esteem individuals also appear more effective in self-regulating goal-directed
behavior (Di Paula and Campbell, 2002). Self-esteem is important for self-
regulation and quality of life, and the relevance of self-esteem for positive
psychology. Self-esteem provides the energy to mobilize human behavior as
well as contributing to its direction (Mackinnon, 2015, p. 18).
Previous research has shown that self-esteem rises when a person
succeeds, is praised, or experiences another’s love, making self-esteem
dependent on not only one’s perceptions of himself but also other’s
perceptions of him (Schmidt and Padilla, 2003). Self-esteem is a major key to
success in life. The development of healthy self-esteem is extremely important
for good personal and social adjustment.
NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF LOW SELF-ESTEEM
People with low self-esteem suffer from feelings of worthlessness,
inferiority, and emotional instability, so leading to dissatisfaction with life
(Ha, 2006). Moreover, there is a tendency of respondents with low self-esteem
scores to have a general negative attitude toward many things, including other
people and personal circumstances (Mackinnon, 2015, p. 15).
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
9
Low self-esteem has been linked to depression, aggression, less
competency to overcome difficulties and decreased level of well-being in
adolescence (Stavropoulos et al., 2015). Weber (2001) hypothesized that
college students who report emotional abuse are expected to have a lower self-
esteem than those who do not report emotional abuse. This hypothesis was
generally supported for male participants only.
Self-esteem was significantly and negatively correlated with internet
addiction (Aydin and Sari, 2011). Using a cross-sectional convenient national
sample of 23,532 Norwegians, Andreassen, Pallesen, and Griffiths (2016)
elucidated the addictive use of social media in reflecting a need to feed the
ego, i.e., narcissistic personality traits, and an attempt to inhibit a negative
self-evaluation, i.e., self-esteem.
The sociometer model maintained that subjectively experienced self-
esteem serves as “a psychological gauge or indicator” that allows people to
efficiently monitor other’s reactions to them. Low self-esteem is
conceptualized as an experiential indicator of social rejection (Leary,
Schreindorfer and Haupt, 1995; Leary, Tambor, Terdal and Downs, 1995).
LOW SELF-ESTEEM AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
The low self-esteem person is an individual whose global self-evaluation
is neutral, whose self-concept is uncertain and confused, who is highly
susceptible to, and dependent on, external self-relevant cues, and whose social
perceptions and behaviors reflect a cautious or conservative orientation
(Campbell and Lavallee, 1993).
Low self-esteem can be understood in terms of confusion or uncertainty in
self-knowledge, a cautious and self-protective approach to life, a shortage of
positive resources in the self, and a chronic internal conflict. They lack a clear,
consistent unified understanding of who they are, which leaves them at the
mercy of events and changing situations (Baumeister, 1993).
Lowered self-esteem frequently accompanies psychiatric disorders. It has
been suggested that low self-esteem is an etiological factor in many
psychiatric conditions as well as in suicidal individuals. With 957 psychiatric
patients, Silverstone, and Salsali (2003) found that all psychiatric patients
suffer some degree of lowered self-esteem. The lowest self-esteem was found
in patients with major depressive disorder, eating disorders, and substance
abuse. The authors concluded that there is a vicious cycle between self-esteem
and onset of psychiatric disorders (See also Murphy et al., 2005).
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
10
Based on three studies, Donnellan, Trzesniewski, Robins, Moffitt, and
Capsi (2005) found a robust relation between low self-esteem and
externalizing problems (aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency).
This relation held for measures of self-esteem and externalizing problems
based on self-reports, teacher’s ratings, and parents’ ratings, and for
participants from different nationalities (United States and New Zealand), and
age groups (adolescents and college students). Using a sample of 1,209
Norwegian adolescents, Moksnes and Espnes (2012), found that self-esteem
was strongly and negatively associated with both state depression and state
anxiety.
Low level of self-esteem has been linked to behavioral problems and poor
school performance as well as serious behavioral problems as suicidal
tendencies, maladjustment, and leads to psychological problems such as
depression, social anxiety, loneliness, alienation, etc (Sharma and Agarwala,
2015).
Kempke, Luyten, Houdenhove, Goossens, Bekaert, and Wambeke (2011)
studied a sample of 192 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. They found
that self-esteem fully mediated the relationship between maladaptive
perfectionism and depression. This finding may have important implications
for the treatment and prevention of depression in these patients. As for the
prognosis, longitudinal studies suggest that low self-esteem predicts
depression later in life (Kamkar, Doyle and Markiewicz, 2012).
The most prominent explanations for the link between low self-esteem and
psychopathology are as follows: the vulnerability model (low self-esteem
increases the probability of psychopathology), and the scar model (low self-
esteem is a consequence of psychopathology rather than a cause) (Zeigler –
Hill, 2011).
SELF-ESTEEM AND DEPRESSION
Depression is used to describe a range of experiences from a slightly
noticeable and temporary mood decrease, as well as a mild of tiredness and
simple sadness, to the most profound state of apathy and severe symptoms of
anhedonia, depressed mood, as well as a set of correlated affective, cognitive,
and somatic symptoms.
According to the DSM5, the essential feature of a major depression is a
period of at least two week of suffering from depressed mood, loss of interest
or pleasure, significant weight loss, insomnia or hypersomnia, psychomotor
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
11
agitation or retardation, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness, diminished ability
to think or concentrate, and recurrent thoughts of death or a suicide attempt
(APA, 2013, pp. 160 – 161). The core symptoms of depression are the same
for children and adolescents as for adults.
Depression prevalence has increased in the last few decades, affecting
younger age groups. According to WHO, depression is the fourth leading
disease and by 2020 it is expected to reach the second place (Tripković, Roje,
Krnic, Nazor and Karin, 2015). Further, it is projected to be the leading cause
of the global burden of disease by the year 2030 (World Health Organization,
2008).
Childhood and adolescence depression have become a subject of
considerable studies over the past few decades. The clinical features of child
and adolescent depression are similar to those of adult depression. Children
cannot achieve their full potential if they are affected by emotional or mental
disturbances that hinder their success. Children experiencing emotional abuse
may experience depression and having low self-esteem. Parental behavior has
been reported to relate to a child’s self-esteem and is known to be as one of the
reactions or consequences of psychological maltreatment (Weber, 2001). An
extensive body of evidence supports the role of family processes in the
development, course and maintenance of depression in children and
adolescents (Sander and McCarty, 2005).
Self-esteem has been implicated as a vulnerability factor in the onset of
depression in the theoretical model of Beck (1967). Further, the role of self-
esteem has been salient in Brown and Harris’s (1978) psychosocial model of
depression. To understand the link between low self-esteem and depression,
Orth and Robins (2013) described several theoretical models concerning this
link. They concluded that the available evidence provides strong support for
the vulnerability model (low self-esteem contributes to depression), and
weaker support for the scar model (depression erodes self-esteem). Moreover,
the vulnerability model is robust and holds across gender, age, affective –
cognitive versus somatic symptoms of depression.
Several studies have shown that increased negative thinking about the self
is a central feature of depression. It has been thoroughly demonstrated that
depressive people think negatively and report lower self-esteem than non
depressed controls. Likewise, several studies have suggested a combined
effect of low self-esteem (or negative cognitions about oneself) and family
functioning on the emergence of adolescent depression (Stavropoulos et al.,
2015). Statistically significant association between low self-esteem and
clinically significant depression was found (Tripković et al., 2015) (See also:
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
12
Sharma and Agarwala, 2014). On the other hand, a positive view of the self,
i.e., self-esteem, plays a role in buffering the relation between negative events
and depressive symptoms.
THE DARK SIDE OF HIGH SELF-ESTEEM
There is a dark side of self-esteem. Baumeister, Smart, and Boden (1996)
suggested that people with high self-esteem are more likely to be conceited,
arrogant, or occasionally narcissistic. They expect to receive positive
evaluations from others; if they are provided with negative feedback, a
threatened ego motivates them to spend personal resources on coping with the
negative evaluations. Neff (2011) pointed out that pursuit of high self-esteem
can be problematic, can sometimes be counterproductive, and may involve
puffing the self up while putting others down.
High scores on self-esteem scales can result from narcissism – a highly
inflated, grandiose view of oneself and one’s positive traits and competence,
conjoined with a sense of entitlement. Although separate measures of
narcissism and normal self-esteem correlate substantially, they have different
outcomes. Narcissism predicts aggression while normal self-esteem does not
(Mackinnon, 2015, pp. 14 – 15).
Some authors view narcissism as an extreme form of self-esteem, so
exaggerated self-esteem leads to narcissism and the search for unconditional
acceptance. Narcissists see themselves as the center of the universe; in the
mirror they only see themselves reflected. They see themselves as if they were
the only reality worthy of esteem, the rest being mere generators of their
supposed grandeur and worth. Narcissists are always talking about their
supposed greatness and worth, about their uncommon, marvelous experiences,
their extremely interesting projects, about how much they have done to
improve in life, and even to help others (Dolan, 2007, p. 71).
The essential feature of narcissistic personality disorder is a pervasive
pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, a grandiose sense of self-
importance, a belief that they are superior, special, or unique (APA, 2013, pp.
669 – 670).
Gerrard, Gibbons, Reis – Bergan, and Russell (2000) studied the self-
serving cognitions among people with high self-esteem who engage in unwise
or less optimal and risky health behavior, such as drinking, smoking, and
unprotected sex. They found that they often utilize a variety of self-serving
cognitive strategies and defensive self-justification and reactance that protect
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
13
them fully acknowledging their vulnerability to the potential negative
consequences of their behavior. For example, they minimize their estimates of
personal risk and overestimate the prevalence of the risk behavior among their
peers. High self-esteem persons employ these strategies to cope with the
inconsistency between their behavior and their positive self-perception.
TERROR-MANAGEMENT THEORY OF SELF-ESTEEM
Terror management theory was the first empirically oriented theory to
address the question: What is the psychological function of self-esteem ?
Terror management theory posits that people are motivated to pursue positive
self-evaluations because self-esteem provides a buffer against the omnipresent
potential for anxiety engendered by the uniquely human awareness of
mortality. Therefore, self-esteem serves as anxiety – buffering terror
management function (Pyszczynski, Greenberg, Solomon and Arndt, 2004).
This existential theory intends to explain two basic tendencies that are
thought to characterize human behavior: a desire to maintain a favorable self-
image, i.e., high self-esteem, and, at the same time, a desire to promote the
beliefs and values of one’s culture. Self-esteem and culture worldviews
function as anxiety buffers to protect the individual from the existential terror
or anxiety that is endangered by awareness of the inevitability of death and the
extinction of one’s culture. It is through the mechanism of self-esteem that
culture buffers or reduces existential anxiety associated with death and dying
(Greenberg, Solomon and Pyszczynski, 1997).
Terror management theory posits both the universal and the cultural
specific aspects of self-esteem. On the one hand, the need for self-esteem in
the service of anxiety reduction is universal. On the other hand, the specific
manner by which self-esteem is acquired and maintained depends on the
demands of a particular social milieu at any given point in time (Wang and
Ollendick, 2001).
CULTURE AND SELF-ESTEEM
Culture shapes various aspects of the self: how people view themselves,
what they strive to be, and when they feel good (or bad) about themselves
(Tsai et al., 2001). The North American and Western European view the self
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
14
as an independent, autonomous, self-contained entity composed of a unique set
of attributes (traits, feelings, values, etc.). These attributes determine and
explain a person’s behavior (Marcus and Kitayama, 1991). In this culture,
where is individualism is prized, the culture urges individuals to view
themselves as independently functioning agents. People who embrace an
independent view of self tend to have a sense of identity that is anchored in its
internal attributes and is viewed as the source of action and the center of
control. Independent view of self and self-esteem are positively correlated
(Heine and Lehman, 2004).
On the other hand, the cultural framework of interdependence
characterizes many Asian, African, and Hispanic collectivistic cultures
(Triandis, 1994). That is, the self cannot be separated from others and the
surrounding social context. Thus, the goal is not to become separate but to fit
in with others.
In an independent culture, high self-esteem derives from evidence that one
has distinguished oneself from others and is different and unique in some
positive sense. By contrast, in an interdependent culture, high self-esteem is a
function of good social relationships, a sense of fitting in, belonging, and to
minimize any sense of uniqueness or distinction (Glaus, 1999; Marcus and
Kitayama, 1994).
Interdependence are more strongly embraced by East Asians, particularly
Japanese. Research indicated that the vast majority of North Americans report
having high self-esteem. Japanese consistently have exhibited lower self-
esteem scores than North Americans (Heine and Lehman, 2004). In a large
scale study, the same authors have reached the conclusion that greater
exposure to Western culture leads to higher self-esteem.
Using a Chinese American sample, Tsai et al. (2001) found that cultural
orientation significantly predicted self-esteem above and beyond the
contribution of age, gender, grade point average, and socioeconomic status.
Although people from East Asian countries consistently report lower self-
esteem than do those from Western countries, the origins of this difference are
unclear. Cai, Brown, Deng, and Oakes (2007) found that Chinese participants
appraised themselves less positively than American participants on a cognitive
measure of self-evaluations, but cultural differences were absent on a measure
of affective self-regard. They found also that cultural differences in modesty
underlie cultural differences in cognitive self-evaluation.
Brown (2008) studied the beliefs about the importance and desirability of
self-esteem. He found that American students view self-esteem as desirable
and consequential, whereas Japanese students view self-esteem as desirable
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
15
but not consequential. In a similar vein, university students from non-Western
culture (Nigeria and Nepale) tend to report higher academic but lower non-
academic self-esteem than their Western peers (Watkins, Akande, Cheng and
Regmi, 1996).
SELF-ESTEEM AND DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES
Some studies investigated self-esteem, socio-economic status, and urban-
rural residence associations. Housley, Martin, McCoy, Greenhouse, Stigger,
Chapin et al. (1987) found that for American urban girls, mean self-esteem of
upper economic status subjects was significantly higher than that of those at
the lower economic status. The self-esteem of upper economic status urban
girls was significantly higher than the self-esteem of their rural peers.
Houlihan, Fitzgerald, and O’Regan (1994) recruited 464 Irish adolescents.
They found that the females from the rural setting suffer significantly more
depressive symptomatology (22%), and poor self-esteem (68%) than the male
and urban participants. Tsai et al. (2001) stated that socioeconomic status has
been found to correlate with self-esteem, with individuals of higher social
class having more positive feelings about themselves than those of lower
social class.
Males typically report higher self-esteem than do females. A number of
studies suggest that boys and girls diverge in their primary source of self-
esteem, with girls being more influenced by relationships and boys being more
influenced by objective success (Heatherton and Wyland, 2003). Individuals
who achieve academically have higher self-esteem than those who do not
(Tsai et al., 2001). You, Shin, and Kim (2016) found that body image has
significant effects on both self-esteem and depression.
Sharaf, Thompson, and Walsh (2009) studied the protective effects of self-
esteem and family support on suicide risk behaviors among at-risk
adolescents. They found that family support moderated that impact of self-
esteem on suicide risk, and the ameliorating effect of self-esteem was stronger
among adolescents with low versus high family support.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
16
STABILITY OF SELF-ESTEEM
Most theories of self-esteem view it as a relatively stable personality trait.
Based on this perspective, self-esteem is stable because it slowly builds over
time through personal experiences, such as repeatedly succeeding at various
tasks or continually being valued by significant others. A number of studies,
however, assumed that self-esteem can momentarily manipulated or affected.
Therefore, self-esteem can be viewed as a “trait” as well as a “state”
(Heatherton and Wyland, 2003).
Greenier et al., (1995) stated that self-esteem instability is a dimension
distinct from level of self-esteem. Self-esteem instability refers to the
magnitude of short term fluctuations that people experience in their
contextually based feelings of self-worth. Among high self-esteem individuals,
self-esteem instability reflects fragility in one’s positive self-feelings, and is
associated with heightened tendencies to defend and promote these positive
self-feelings. On the other hand, among low self-esteem individuals, self-
esteem instability is related to various indices of psychological difficulties and
maladjustment.
CONCLUSION
Thousands of research papers have published in the self-esteem subject
and many normal and abnormal variables have been correlated with it. Indeed,
much knowledge about self-esteem has been accumulated in the mainstream
Western industrialized culture. A less amount of research papers has been
published to compare Western and Asian, particularly Chinese and Japanese
samples, on self-esteem. However, the studies with the Arab participants are
scarce. The Arab countries have special characteristics regarding geography,
history, political conditions, economy, language, religions, culture, and child
rearing practices, among other factors. Further studies are needed to examine
the level, the underlying meanings, and the social and cultural contexts that
influence self-esteem among Arab participants, as well as its cultural
predictors.
Regarding the assessment issue, a major problem inherent in the measures
of self-esteem is the extent to which self-reports are influenced by self-
presentational concerns (Heatherton and Wyland, 2003). The available
measures seem to be contaminated with social desirability.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
17
As Baumeister (1994) stated, people are guided by a strong, fundamental
desire for self-esteem. People claim credit for success but deny blame for
failures. They exaggerate and overestimate their abilities … they
systematically choose to compare themselves with others who are less gifted
or worse off than themselves. They deny or conceal their shortcomings and
advertise their virtues and positive traits. They identify themselves with
successful groups and distance themselves from failing or stigmatized groups
(p. 84).
One solution to face the problem of responding to the self-esteem
measures according to social desirability, might be to use measures of
defensiveness to tease out the variance related to the self-report biases, such as
the Crowne and Marlowe Scale (1960). It is suggested to administer a social
desirability scale along with the self-esteem questionnaire. Then, it is hopeful
to reach a statistical formula to add a score of the social desirability scale to
the self-esteem measure to suppress the participant’s attempt to make
favorable impression. This proposed procedure is similar to the mathematical
correction of some clinical scales of the MMPI for defensiveness by adding a
fraction of the K and L validity scores to the clinical scales.
REFERENCES
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2007). Love of life as a new construct in the well-being
domain. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 125-134.
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2011). The development and validation of the Arabic
Scale of Mental Health (ASMH). Psychological Reports, 109, 949-964.
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2012). Associations between religiosity, mental health
and subjective well-being among Arab samples from Egypt and Kuwait.
Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 15, 741-758.
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2013). The Arabic Scale of Happiness: Psychometric
characteristics. Comprehensive Psychology, 2, Article 5.
Abdel-Khalek, A. M., Korayem, A. and El-Nayal. M. (2012). Self-esteem
among college students from four Arab countries. Psychological Reports,
110, 297-303.
Abdel-Khalek, A. M. and Snyder, C. R. (2007). Correlates and predictors of an
Arabic translation of the Snyder Hope Scale. The Journal of Positive
Psychology, 2, 228-235.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of
mental disorders (5th ed.) Arlington, VA: APA.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
18
Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S. and Griffiths, M. D. (2016). The relationship
between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem:
Findings from a large national survey. Addictive Behavior,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006.
Aydin, B. and Sari, S. V. (2011). Internet addiction among adolescents: The
role of self-esteem. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3500-
3505.
Baumeister, R. F. (1993). Understanding the inner nature of low self-esteem:
Uncertain, fragile, protective, and conflicted. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.),
Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 201-218). New York:
Plenum.
Baumeister, R.F. (1994). Self-esteem. In V.S. Ramachandran (Ed.),
Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4; pp. 83-87) New York:
Academic Press.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L. and Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened
egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem.
Psychological Review, 103, 5-33.
Baumeister, R. R., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I. and Vohs, K. E. (2003).
Does high self-esteem cause better performance, internpersonal success,
happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public
Interest, 4, 1-44.
Beck, A.T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical
aspects. New York: Hoeber.
Blascovich, J. and Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In J.P.
Robinson, P.R. Shaver and L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of
personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol I; pp. 115-160). San
Diego: Academic Press.
Branden, N. (1969). The psychology of self-esteem. New York: Bantam.
Brown, G.W. and Harris, T. (1978). Social origins of depression. New York:
Free Press.
Brown, J. D., Dutton, K. A. and Cook, K. E. (2001). From the top down: Self-
esteem and self-evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 615-631.
Brown, R.A. (2008). American and Japanese beliefs about self-esteem. Asian
Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 293-299.
Cai, H., Brown, J. D., Deng, C. and Oakes, M. A. (2007). Self-esteem and
culture: Differences in cognitive self-evaluations or affective self-regard.
Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 162-170.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
19
Campbell, J. D. and Lavallee, L. F. (1993). Who am I ? The role of self-
concept confusion in understanding the behavior of people with low self-
esteem. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 3-
20). New York: Plenum Press.
Carmines, E.G. and Zeller, R.A. (1974). On establishing the empirical
dimensionality of theoretical terms: An analytical example. Political
Methodology, 1, 75-96.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). Patterns of change: Measurement in relation to state-
dimension, trait change, lability, and process concepts. In R.B. Cattell
(Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 288- 329).
Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cheng, S. and Hamid, P.N. (1995). An error in the use of translated scales:
The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale for Chinese. Perceptual and Motor
Skills, 81, 431-434.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco:
Freeman.
Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability
independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24,
349-354.
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-
esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 30-
49). New York: Springer.
Di Paula, A. and Campbell, J. D. (2002). Self-esteem and persistence in the
face of failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 711-
724.
doi: 10.1007 / s 12187-016-9385-z.
Dolan, S. L. (2007). Stress, self-esteem, health and work. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E. and
Caspi, A. (2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial
behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science,16, 328-335.
Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F.X., Reis-Bergan, M. and Russell, D.W. (2000). Self-
esteem, self-serving cognitions, and health risk behavior. Journal of
Personality, 68, 1178-1201.
Gilovich, T., Keltner, D. and Nisbett, R. (2006). Social psychology. New
York: Norton and Company.
Glaus, K. (1999). Measuring self-esteem. In C.J. Carlock (Ed.), Enhancing
self-esteem (pp. 457-475). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
20
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S. and Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management
theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and
conceptual refinements. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental
social psychology (pp. 61-139). New York: Academic Press.
Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H. and Waschull, S. B. (1995). Not all high (or
low) self-esteem people are the same: Theory and research on stability of
self-esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp.
51-71). New York: Springer
Greenwald, A.G. and Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes,
self esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
Ha, Y. J. (2006). The relationship among self-esteem, internal locus of control,
and psychological well-being. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Yonsei
University, South Korea.
Heatherton, T.F. and Wyland, C.L. (2003). Assessing self-esteem. In S.J.
Lopez and C.R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A
handbook of models and measures (pp. 219-233). Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Heine, S. J. and Lehman, D. R. (2004). Move the body, change the self:
Acculturative effects on the self-concept. In M. Schaller and C. S.
Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 305-331).
London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hewitt, J.P. (2002). The social construction of self-esteem. In C.R. Snyder and
S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 135-147). New
York: Oxford University Press.
Houlihan, B., Fitzgerald, M. and O’Regan, M. (1994). Self-esteem,
depression, and hostility in Irish adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 17,
565-577.
Housley, K., Martin, S., McCoy, H., Greenhouse, P., Stigger, F., Chapin, L. et
al. (1987). Self-esteem of adolescent females as related to race, economic
status, and area of residence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 559-566.
http://www.cesa4.k12.wi.us/cms_files/resources/12winterparapost.pdf.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. Chicago: Encyclopedia
Britannica.
Kamkar, K., Doyle, A. and Markiewicz, D. (2012). Insecure attachment to
parents and depressive symptoms in early adolescence: Mediating roles of
attributions and self-esteem. International Journal of Psychological
Studies, 4, 3-18.
Kempke, S., Luyten, P., Houdenhove, B. V., Goossens, L., Bekaert, P. and
Wambeke, P. V. (2011). Self-esteem mediates the relationship between
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
21
maladaptive perfectionism and depression in chronic fatigue syndrome.
Clinical Rheumatology, 30, 1543-1548.
Lavoie, R. (2012). Self-esteem: The cause and effect of success for the child
with learning differences. Para Post, From:
http://www.cesa4.k12.wi.us/cms_files/resources/12winterparapost.pdf.
Leary, M. R., Schreindorfer, L. S. and Haupt, A. L. (1995). The role of low
self-esteem in emotional and behavioral problems: Why is low self-esteem
dysfunctional. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 297-314.
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E., Terdal, S. and Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as
an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
Lin, H. C., Tang, T. C., Yen, J-Y., Ko, C-H., Huang, C-F., Liu, S - C. and
Yen, C-F. (2008). Depression and its association with self-esteem, family,
peer and school factors in a population of 9586 adolescents in Southern
Taiwan. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 62, 412- 420.
Mackinnon, N. J. (2015). Self-esteem and beyond. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Manning, M.A., Bear, G.G. and Minke, K.M. (2006). Self-concept and self-
esteem. In G.G. Bear and K.M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III:
Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 341-356). Washington
DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
Marcus, H.R. and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for
cognition, motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 98, 224- 253.
Marcus, H.R. and Kitayama, S. (1994). The cultural construction of the self
and emotion: Implications for social behavior. In S. Kitayama and H.R.
Marcus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual
influence. Washingtion, DC: American Psychological Association.
Mogonea, F- R. and Mogonea, F. (2014). The role of the family in building
adolescent’s self-esteem. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127,
189-193.
Moksnes, U. K. and Espnes, G. A. (2012). Self-esteem and emotional health in
adolescents-gender and age as potential moderators. Scandinavian Journal
of Psychology, 53, 483-489.
Murphy, C. M., Stosny, S. and Morrel, T. M. (2005). Change in self-esteem
and physical aggression during treatment for partner violent men. Journal
of Family Violence, 20, 201-210.
Neff, K. D. (2011). Self-compassion, self-esteem and well-being. Social and
Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 1-12.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
22
Orth, U. and Robins, R. W. (2013). Understanding the link between low self-
esteem and depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22,
455-460.
Orth, U., Trzesniewski, K. H. and Robins, R. W. (2010). Self-esteem
development from young adulthood to old age: A cohort-sequential
longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 645-
658.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S. and Arndt, J. (2004). Why do
people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review.
Psychological Bulletin, 130, 435-468.
Reasoner, R. (2005). The true meaning of self-esteem. From: The International
Council for self-esteem. Retrieved 5th May, 2005.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self- image. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1987). Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale. In K. Corcoran and J.
Fischer (Eds.), Measures for clinical practice (pp. 408-409). New York:
Free Press.
Sander, J. B. and McCarty, C. A. (2005). Youth depression in the family
context: Familial risk factors and models of treatment. Clinical Child and
Family Psychology Review, 8, 203-219.
Schmidt, J. A. and Padilla, B. (2003). Self-esteem and family challenge: An
investigation of their effects on achievement. Journal of Youth and
Adolescence, 32, 37-46.
Schmitt, D. P. and Allik, J. (2005). Simulatneous administration of the
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and
culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 89, 623-642.
Sedikides, C. and Gress, A. P. (2003). Portraits of the self. In M. A. Hogg and
J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 110-138).
London: Sage.
Sharaf, A. Y., Thompson, E. A. and Walsh, E. (2009). Protective effects of
self-esteem and family support on suicide risk behaviors among at-risk
adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 22,
160-168.
Sharma, S. and Agarwala, S. (2014). Self-esteem and collective self-esteem as
predictors of depression. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 21-28.
Sharma, S. and Agarwala, S. (2015). Self-esteem and collective self-esteem
among adolescents: An interventional approach. Psychological Thought,
8, 105-113.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem
23
Silverstone, P. H. and Salsali, M. (2003). Low self-esteem and psychiatric
patients: Part I-The relationship between low self-esteem and psychiatric
diagnosis. Annals of General Hospital Psychiatry, 2,
Smith-Lovin, L. (1995). The sociology of affect and emotion. In K. Cook,
G.A. Fine and J.S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social
psychology (pp. 118-148). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R. and Jacobs, G. A.
(1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto,
CA: Consulting Psychologists.
Stavropoulos, V., Lazaratou, H., Marini, E. and Dikeos, D. (2015). Low family
satisfaction and depression in adolescence: The role of self-esteem.
Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 5, 109-118.
Talib, J., Mohamad, Z. and Mamat, M. (2011). Effects of parenting style on
children development. World Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 14-35.
Triandis, H.C. (1994). Major cultural syndromes and emotion. In S. Katayama
and H.R. Marcus (Eds.), Emotions and culture: Empirical studies of
mutual influence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tripković, I., Roje, R., Krnic, S., Nazor, M. and Karin, Z. (2015). Depression
and Self-esteem in early adolescence. Central Europe Journal of Public
Health, 23, 166-169.
Tsai, I., Ying, Y-W. and Lee, P. A. (2001). Cultural predictors of self-esteem:
A study of Chinese American female and male young adults. Cultural
Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 284-297.
Wang, Y. and Ollendick, T. H. (2001). A cross-cultural and developmental
analysis of self-esteem in Chinese and Western children. Clinical Child
and Family Psychology Review, 4, 253-271.
Watkins, D., Akande, A., Cheng, C. and Regmi, M. (1996). Culture and
gender differences in the self-esteem of college students: A four-country
comparison. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 321-328.
Weber, A. D. (2001). Influence of family environment on self-esteem and
hostility. Honors theses. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
World Health Organization (2008). The global burden of disease. Geneva,
Switzerland: Author.
You, S., Shin, K. and Kim, A. Y. (2016). Body image, self-esteem, and
depression in Korean adolescents. Child Indres.
Doi: 10.1007/s 12187-016-9385-z.
Zeigler-Hill, V. (2011). The connections between self-esteem and
psychopathology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 41, 157-164.
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Complimentary Contributor Copy

PSYCHOLOGY OF EMOTIONS, MOTIVATIONS AND ACTIONS
SELF-ESTEEM
PERSPECTIVES, INFLUENCES AND
IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES
FRANKLIN HOLLOWAY
EDITOR
New York
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Copyright © 2016 by Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted
in any form or by any means: electronic, electrostatic, magnetic, tape, mechanical photocopying,
recording or otherwise without the written permission of the Publisher.
We have partnered with Copyright Clearance Center to make it easy for you to obtain permissions to
reuse content from this publication. Simply navigate to this publication’s page on Nova’s website and
locate the “Get Permission” button below the title description. This button is linked directly to the
title’s permission page on copyright.com. Alternatively, you can visit copyright.com and search by
title, ISBN, or ISSN.
For further questions about using the service on copyright.com, please contact:
Copyright Clearance Center
Phone: +1-(978) 750-8400 Fax: +1-(978) 750-4470 E-mail: info@copyright.com.
NOTICE TO THE READER
The Publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this book, but makes no expressed or
implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No liability is
assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of information
contained in this book. The Publisher shall not be liable for any special, consequential, or exemplary
damages resulting, in whole or in part, from the readers’ use of, or reliance upon, this material. Any
parts of this book based on government reports are so indicated and copyright is claimed for those parts
to the extent applicable to compilations of such works.
Independent verification should be sought for any data, advice or recommendations contained in this
book. In addition, no responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to
persons or property arising from any methods, products, instructions, ideas or otherwise contained in
this publication.
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information with regard to the subject
matter covered herein. It is sold with the clear understanding that the Publisher is not engaged in
rendering legal or any other professional services. If legal or any other expert assistance is required, the
services of a competent person should be sought. FROM A DECLARATION OF PARTICIPANTS
JOINTLY ADOPTED BY A COMMITTEE OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION AND A
COMMITTEE OF PUBLISHERS.
Additional color graphics may be available in the e-book version of this book.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
ISBN: 978-1-53610-312-0 (e-book)
Published by Nova Science Publishers, Inc. † New York
Complimentary Contributor Copy

CONTENTS
Preface vii
Chapter 1 Introduction to the Psychology of Self-Esteem 1
Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
Chapter 2 Relationship between Self-Compassion, Self-Esteem
and Mental Health 25
Andrea Sági
Chapter 3 Relationship between Physical Activity, BMI,
Screen Time and Self-Esteem on Chilean Children 47
J. J. Muros, C. Cofre-Bolados, F. Zurita-Ortega and
E. Knox
Chapter 4 Self-Esteem and Consumer Behaviour 59
Natasha Pitfield
Chapter 5 Gender Differences in the Relationship between
Self-Esteem Varieties and Aggressiveness 75
Renata Marčič and Darja Kobal Grum
Chapter 6 The Influence of Self-Esteem and Peer Norms on
Substance Use among Hispanic Adolescents 107
Oladunni A. Oluwoye, Laura A. Nabors,
Robert A. Yockey and Angelica M. Hardee
Chapter 7 Self-Esteem and Its Relation with Family
Atmosphere and Reported Depression Among
Arab Adolescents 125
Ahmed M. Abdel-Khalek
Complimentary Contributor Copy

Contents
vi
Chapter 8 Self-Esteem among Portuguese Migrants
in Switzerland 141
Ana Cristina Menezes Fonseca and Félix Neto
Chapter 9 Self-Esteem Implicit Association Test:
A State or Trait Measure? 159
Francesco Dentale and Claudio Barbaranelli
Chapter 10 Examining Self-Esteem, Stress, and Anxiety on
Marijuana Use Among Students at Historically Black
and Predominantly White Universities 177
Oladunni A. Oluwoye, Russell J. Fricano,
Jacob O. Oluwoye, Salam Khan and
Adetokunbo O. Ayokanmbi
Chapter 11 Charting a Course to Self-Esteem: Evidence from
Four Independent Studies Showing Elevated Self-
Esteem Following Participation in a 10-Day Voyage 195
Sarah Kafka, Jillian G. Hayhurst, Mike Boyes,
Damian Scarf, Ted Ruffman, Maurice Stringer
and John A. Hunter
Chapter 12 Improvement of Self-Esteem in Persons
with Dependency on Illicit Drugs After
Clinical Treatment 231
Saša Ucman and Darja Kobal Grum
Index 273
Complimentary Contributor Copy