Content uploaded by Hanifeh Seyed Hajizadeh
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Hanifeh Seyed Hajizadeh on Oct 26, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Acta Hortic. 1131. ISHS 2016. DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1131.1
Proc. III Int. Conf. on Quality Management in Supply Chains of Ornamentals
Ed.: M.M. Jowkar
1
The study of freesia (Freesia spp.) cut flowers quality in
relation with nano silver in preservative solutions
H.S.Hajizadeha
DepartmentofHorticulturalSciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Universityof Maragheh, Maragheh, 55181-83111,
Iran.
Abstract
Freesiaisoneofthemostimportantcutflowersinflowerindustry.Extending
thevaselifeoffreesiafloweris,thus,veryimportant.Recentworkindicatesthatthe
useofnanosilverparticles(becauseofahigharea/volumeratio)showsantimicrobial
effectsandhasbeenprovenasabeneficialagentinpreservativesolutionsofseveral
cutflowers.Hence,theeffectsofdifferentconcentrationsofnanosilverparticlesin
thevasewater(5,10and15ppm)combinedwith3%sucroseoncutfreesiavaselife
werestudied.Distilledwaterwasusedasacontrol.Measurementsincludedthewater
uptake,numberofopenedbuds,petalmembranestabilityindex,lipidperoxidation
andvaselife.Resultsshowedapositiveeffectofnanosilveroncutfreesiaflowervase
life.Flowersplacedin10ppmnanosilverand3%sucrosehadthelongestvaselife,as
comparedtocontrolshavingavaselifeof5days.Thenumberofopenedfloretsofthat
treatmentwasalsoimproved,ascomparedtothecontrol.Petalmembranestability
indexdecreasedduringvaselife,butnoeffectofnanosilverwasnoted.The10ppm
nanosilvercombinedwith3%sucroseshowedthehighestflowerfreshweight.Lipid
peroxidation,measuredbymalonedialehideproduction,increasedduringvaselife,
beingveryslowinflowerstreatedwithnanosilverparticlesascomparedtothe
controls.Totall y,itcanbeconcludedthatusingof10ppmnanosilvercombinedwith
3%sucroseinvasesolutionoffreesiaflowerswasthebesttreatmentinpreserving
thebestqualityofcutfreesiaflowers.
Keywords:freesia (Freesiaspp.),longevity,lipidperoxidation,nanosilver,preservative
solution
INTRODUCTION
Freesia is a popular and widely grown cut flower. Maintaining good postharvest
qualityandextendingthevaselifeisconsideredimportant for having acceptable products
for the markets (Salehi Sardoei et al., 2013). Cut freesias typicallylast 4 to 12 days at the
consumerlevel,dependingontheircare,maturityatthetimeofsaleandtheenvironmental
conditionsinwhichtheyaredisplayed(Wangetal.,1998).
Vaselifemaybereducedbyseveralfactors,includingwaterstress (reviewed by
Fanourakisetal.,2013,2015),carbohydratedepletion,or ethyleneaction(Barendse,1974;
Aslmoshtaghietal.,2014).Carbohydratereservesincutflowersarelowafterexcisionfrom
the mother plant (Ho and Nichols, 1977). Adding carbohydrates tothevasewatermay
improvethecarbohydratestatus,andthroughthisthevaselifeof several cut flowers. For
instance,positiveresultsofaddingsugarinthevasewaterhavebeenreportedfortuberose
(Reidetal.,1989).
Apositivewaterbalanceplaysamajorroleinpostharvestqualityofcutflowers
(Fanourakisetal.,2012).Thewateruptakeisoftenreducedbymicroorganismproliferation
in the vase solution, which results in the basal end occlusion (Jowkar et al., 2012). Using
nano-silvercompounds (NS)asapulse or as a vase solution treatmentforcutflowersisa
relativelynewtechnique(Liuetal.,2009),whichhasbeenshown to have antibacterial
effects(Altetal.,2004;Moronesetal.,2005).Thesenanometersizedsilver(Ag+)particles
aE-mail: hajizade@maragheh.ac.ir
2
(NS)areconsideredtoinhibit bacteria andothermicroorganismsmorestronglythanAgin
variousoxidationstates;Ag0,Ag+,Ag2+,Ag3+(Furnoetal.,2004;Asgarietal.,2013).Vaselife
of‘Ruikou’cutgerbera(Liuetal.,2009),cutroses(Ohkawaetal.,1999;Jowkaretal.,2013),
Asiatic hybrid lilium ‘Dream Land’ and Oriental hybridlilium ‘Siberia’(Kimetal.,2005),
gerbera(Mohammadijuetal.,2014),andalstromeria(Alimoradietal.,2013)hasbeenshow
besignificantlyimprovedwhenaddingNSparticlesinthevasewater. This NS-particle
promotingeffectisexpectedtobelinkedtotheirbiocideeffect.However,silveralsoinhibits
ethylene-mediatedprocess(Ichimuraetal.,2008).Thismightplayarole,sincecutfreesias
aremoderatelysensitivetoethylene.Theaimofthisworkisto investigate the effect of
adding both sucrose and nano silver particles in the vase water, on vase life of Freesia
refractacutflowers.
MATERIALSANDMETHODS
Plantmaterial
WhitetetraploidFreesiahybrida(WFH)arewhiteflowers,withayellowspotonthe
perianthtubeandalmostscentless(Wangetal.,1998).Fortheexperimentfreshcutflowers
of Freesiarefracta were bought from a flower grower in Pakdasht (Varamin, Iran) and
transported in water to the Horticultural Laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture
(Maragheh,Iran).Stemsofflowersweretrimmedtouniformlength(about30cm)and
flowerswereplacedinglassvials in a climatecontrolledroomat20±1°C,RH=60-65%and
12 μmol m-2s
-1lightintensity(providedbycool-whitefluorescencelamps)under a daily
lightperiodof12h.Freesiaflowersstoodindividuallyinvialswithdeionizedwater(T0),3%
sucrose(T1) andcombinationsofdifferentconcentrations ofnanosilver5,10and15ppm
and3%sucroseasT2,T3andT4,respectively,with4replicationsforeachtreatment.The
postharvest physiological characteristics of the flower stems were studied throughout the
vaselifeperiod.
Relativefreshweightchanges
Relative freshweightwasrecordedat 3-dayintervals. Inorderto recordfresh weight
changesofcut flowers,flowerstems weretakenout ofvasemakingsurethatstemenddid
notdryandweightedasquicklyaspossibleevery3days.Relative fresh weight was
calculatedas:RFW(%)=(Wt/Wt0)×100;where,Wtisweightofstems(g)att=daystart(0),
3,6,9andetc.,andWt0isweightofthesamestem(g)att=day0(Heetal.,2006;Liuetal.,
2009).
Solutionuptake
Solutionuptakeofflowerswasmeasuredusingabalancebyweighting each vase
containing its solution without flowers and correcting the evaporation from the 4 vases
which did not contain any flowers and were located between the vases that contained
flowersatdifferentplaces.Vasesolutionuptakewascalculatedas:vasesolutionuptakerate
(gstem-1day-1)=(St-1-St);where,Stisweightofvasesolution(g)att=daystart,3,6,9and
etc., and St-1 is weight of vases olution (g) on the previous measurement (He et al., 2006;
Jowkar,2006,2015;Liuetal.,2009).
Vas elife
Theaveragevaselifeoftheinflorescencewascountedfromthedayoftransferof
flowersto the holding solution and wasassessedasthenumberdaystowiltingofflowers.
Theflowerswerecheckedonceadayforsignsofdeterioration.
Membranestabilityindex
Freshpetalsamples(0.1g)weredividedintopiecesof0.3cminlengthandplacedin
vials containing 10 mL of distilled water. The vials were put in a laboratory water bath
(30°C)for30minandthefirstelectricalconductivitywasrecorded(C1).Theothersamples
were heated (100°C) for 10 min to liberate all electrolytes, thencooled,andthesecond
3
electrical conductivity was recorded(C2). The m ean of 4 readingsperpetalfrom3petals
per treatment were measured. The membrane stability index(MSI)wascalculatedbythe
followingequation(Sairametal.,2003):MSI=[1–(C1/C2)]×100.
Malonaldehyde(MDA)content
Petalswereselectedfromeachtreatmentat0,3,6,9,12and15daysforMDAcontent
measurement.MDAwasextractedwith10%trichloroaceticacidand assayed at 450, 532
and600nmfollowingtheproceduresthatweredescribedbyDhindsaetal.(1981)as
modifiedbyXuetal.(2008).
Statisticalanalysis
TherecordeddatawerestaticallyanalyzedusingtheSASsoftware 9.1. Duncan’s
multiplerangetestswereusedtogroupthedifferencesbetweentreatmentsatp≤0.05.
RESULTSANDDISCUSSION
Vas elife
Thevaselifeofcutflowerswassignificantlyincreasedbynano silver particles at all
concentrations as compared to the control and treatments with 3%sucrose.Thehighest
vaselifebelongedtothe3% sucroseand10ppm nano silver(Figure1).Statisticalanalysis
showedthatthereweresignificantdifferencesinflowerlongevity after different
concentrationsofnanosilvertreatments.Thecontrolflowersremainedreasonablyfreshfor
10dayswhereasvaselifeofthe10ppmnanosilverwassignificantlyhigherabout5 days
more.Previousresearcheshadrevealedthat thenanosilvertreatmentssignificantlyextend
thevaselifeofcutflowers(Furnoetal.,2004;Liuetal.,2009),thatisinagreementwithour
results.
Figure1. Theeffectofdifferenttreatmentsonvaselifeofcutfreesiaflower.T0=control;T1
=3%sucrose;T2=3% sucrose + 5 ppm nanosilver;T3=3%sucrose+10ppm
nanosilverandT4=3%sucrose+15ppmnanosilver.
This effect of nano silver might be due to reduced bacterial growth(thuslower
vascularblockage),maintainingamorefavorablewateruptake,orasuppressedwaterloss
(Morietal.,2001;Mei-huaetal.,2008),ordecreasedethyleneaction(Zamanietal.,2011).
Relativefreshweight
AsshowninFigure2,relativefreshweightinitiallyincreased(till 5thday)andthen
4
decreasedinalltreatmentsbutwith a differentrate.A variationintermsofrelativefresh
weightwasobservedamongthetreatmentsandthedifferenceswerestatisticallysignificant
(p<0.01).Therelativefreshweightwasaffectedbynanosilvertreatments,sincecontrolcut
flowershadsignificantlylowerrelativefreshweightduringexperiment(Figure3),whilethe
highestlevelswereobtainedwith10ppmnanosilvertreatment(Figure 2). Decrease in
relativefreshweightofcutflowersduringthedaysafterharvest could be due to the
decreaseinwateruptake(Sereketal.,1995).Alaeyetal.(2011)reportedthatthehighest
relativefreshweightofcutroseflowerswasobserved in vase solutions which showedthe
greatestwateruptake.OurresultsareinagreementwithBahrehmandet al. (2014) which
concluded that quality of tuberose cut flowers can be improved bytreatmentwitha
combinationofsucroseandNS.Itissuggestedthattheincrease in evaluations for fresh
weightwaspossiblycausedbytheincreasedenergysupplyfromsucroseandtheregulation
ofwaterrelationsbynanosilver(Lüetal.,2010).
Figure2. Theinteractionbetweentimeanddifferenttreatmentsonrelativefreshweightof
cutfreesiaflower.T0=control;T1=3%sucrose;T2=3%sucrose+5ppmnano
silver;T3=3%sucrose+10ppmnanosilverandT4=3%sucrose+15ppmnano
silver.
b
aa
aa
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
T0 T1 T2 T3 T4
Treatment
Relative fresh weight (%)
Figure3. Theeffectofdifferenttreatmentsonrelativefreshweightofcutfreesiaflower.T0
= control; T1 = 3% sucrose; T2 = 3% sucrose + 5 ppm nano silver;T3=3%
sucrose+10ppmnanosilverandT4=3%sucrose+15ppmnanosilver.
5
Openedflorets
According to the mean comparisons there were significant differences (P≤0.01)
betweencontrolandtreatmentsT2andT3onfloretopening,astreatmentsincluding5and
10ppmnanosilverhadmoreopenedfloretsoninflorescence(Figure4).Asshown,flowers
storedinsolutionswith3%sucroseand10ppmnanosilver,had 12 opened florets as
comparedtocontrolwith7/66openedflorets.Alsoresultsshowthesignificanteffectof
timeonfloretopening(p≤0.01;Figure5).AsitisshowninFigure5theopeningtrendof
floretsincontroland3%sucrosewereslowerthanothertreatments at 9thand10
thday,
respectively.However,thementionedtrendinalltreatmentswith nano silver were
continueduntil12thday.
Figure4. Theeffectofdifferenttreatmentsonthenumberof opened florets of freesia cut
flower.T0=control;T1=3%sucrose;T2=3%sucrose+5ppmnanosilver;T3=
3%sucrose+10ppmnanosilverandT4=3%sucrose+15ppmnanosilver.
Figure5. The effect of time on the number of opened florets offreesiacutflower.T0=
control;T1=3%sucrose;T2=3%sucrose+5ppmnanosilver;T3=3%sucrose
+10ppmnanosilverandT4=3%sucrose+15ppmnanosilver.
6
Accordingtotheresultsitisclearthatopeningoffloretsduringthetimehasa
progressive trend in all treatments and also in control but therateoffloretopening,was
different.As floretsoffreesia intreatmentsincludingnanosilveropened fasterthanothers
especiallyinnanosilverwith5and10ppmconcentrations.Ingeneral visual evaluation
showedthatfreesiaflowers in 10 ppmnanosiversolutionwerewhiterandmorebrilliant
thanotherswhichimpliesontheirbetterdisplaylife(Figure6).
Figure6.ThecomparisonbetweencontrolandT3freesiaflowersat6thday.
Petalmembranestabilityindex(MSI)
Theresultsshowedasignificanteffectoftimeonpetalmembrane stability index
(P≤0.01)asthisindexdecreasedduringvaselife(Figures7and8)butnotaffectedbynano
silver particles. It was a little strange because the positive effect of nano silver on the
stabilityofmembranesisgenerallyaccepted.Ithasbeenshownthattheeffectofnano-silver
couldbeduetotheinhibitoryeffectsofsilveronethylene(Reidetal.,1989)incutfreesia
flowerswhicharemoderatelysensitivetoethylene.
Figure7.Theeffectofstoringtimeonpetalmembranestabilityindex.
7
Figure8.Curveregressionbetweenstoringtimeandpetalmembranestabilityindex.
Wateruptake
Resultsshowedasignificanteffectofdifferentpreservativesolutionsonwateruptake
(p≤0.01) as control flowers and flowers that were stored in 5 ppm nano silver combined
with3%sucrosehadthelowest(1.38mLg-1fw)andhighest(2.54mLg-1fw)wateruptake,
respectively.Inturn,flowersin10ppmnanosilvercombinedwith3%sucrosehadthe
highestwateruptakeafterT2(Figure9).
Theincreasedwateruptakemaybeattributedtotheinhibitionofmicrobialgrowthin
vasesolutioncontainingNSasreportedbyLüetal.(2010).
Figure9. Theeffectofdifferenttreatmentson flowerwateruptake.T0=control;T1=3%
sucrose;T2=3%sucrose+5ppmnanosilver;T3=3%sucrose+10ppmnano
silverandT4=3%sucrose+15ppmnanosilver.
CONCLUSION
Thenaturallyshortvaselifeofthecutflowersisoneofthemostimportantproblems.
Usingdifferenttreatmentsisrecommendedtokeepingqualityandextendingthevaselifeof
cut flowers. In this study, influence of nano silver postharvest applications on keeping
quality and vase life of cut freesia flowers during vase period were investigated. This
researchshowedthattherelativefreshweight,wateruptake,open florets, membrane
stabilityindexandvaselifeofflowerspreservedin10ppmnanosilver+3%sucrosewere
significantlybetterthancontrolandalsoothertreatments.Inaddition,statistically
significant differences were observed between control and nano silver treatments in all
measuredparameters.Intermsofoverallperformance,applicationof10ppmnanosilver+
8
3%sucroseisfoundtobemoreeffectivethan5and15ppmnanosilverapplication.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
TheauthorsaregratefultothedirectorofresearchandHorticultural laboratory in
departmentofhorticultureattheUniversityofMaragheh,Maragheh,Iranforprovidingthe
facilitiesforthethesis.
Literaturecited
Alaey,M.,Babalar, M., Naderi, R.,andKafi,M. (2011). Effectofpre-andpostharvestsalicylicacidtreatmenton
physio-chemical attributes in relationto vase-life of rose cut flowers.Postharvest Biol. Technol.61(1),91–94
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.02.002.
Alimoradi, M., Jafararpoor, M., and Golparvar, A. (2013). Improvingthekeepingqualityandvaselifeofcut
Alstroemeriaflowersbypost-harvestnanosilvertreatments.Int.J.Agri.Crop.Sci.11,632–635.
Alt,V.,Bechert,T.,Steinrücke,P.,Wagener,M.,Seidel,P.,Dingeldein,E.,Domann,E.,andSchnettler,R. (2004).An
invitroassessmentoftheantibacterialpropertiesandcytotoxicity of nanoparticulate silver bone cement.
Biomaterials25(18),4383–4391.PubMedhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.078
Asgari,M.,Azimi,M.H.,Hamzehi,Z.,Mortazavi,S.N.,andKhodabandelu,F.(2013).Effectofnan-silverandsucrose
onvaselifeofTuberose(Polianthestuberosacv.peril)cutflowers.Intl.J.Agron.Plant.Prod.4,680–687.
Aslmoshtaghi,E., Jafari,M., andRahemi,M. (2014).Effects ofdaffodilflowersandcobalt chlorideonvaselifeof
cutrose.JournalofChemicalHealthRisks.4,1–6.
Bahrehmand, S., Razmjoo, J., and Farahmand, H. (2014). International Journal of Horticultural Science and
Tec h nol o gy. 1,67–77.
Barendse,L.V.J.(1974).Schade doornarcisseslijm bijverschillendebloemsoorten.VakbladvoordeBloemisterij.
29,12–13.
Dhindsa, R.S., Plumb-Dhindsa, P., and Thorpe, T.A. (1981).Le af senescence: correlatedwith increased levels of
membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levelsof su peroxide dismutase and catalase. J.
Exp.Bot.32(1),93–101http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/32.1.93.
Fanourakis, D., Carvalho, S.M.P., Almeida, D.P.F., van Kooten, O., van Doorn, W.G., and Heuvelink, E. (2012).
Postharvestwaterrelationsin cutrose cultivarswithcontrastingsensitivitytohigh relativeairhumidityduring
growth.PostharvestBiol.Technol.64(1),64–73http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.09.016.
Fanourakis,D.,Pieruschka,R.,Savvides,A.,Macnish,A.J.,Sarlikioti,V.,andWoltering,E.J.(2013). Sourcesofvase
life variation in cut roses: A review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 78, 1–15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.postharvbio.2012.12.001.
Fanourakis,D.,Velez-Ramirez,A.I.,In,B.-C.,Barendse,H.,vanMeeteren,U.,andWoltering,E.J.(2015).Asurveyof
preharvest conditions affecting theregulationofwaterlossduring vase life. Acta Hortic. 1064, 195–204
http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1064.22.
Furno,F.,Morley,K.S.,Wong,B.,Sharp,B.L.,Arnold,P.L.,Howdle,S.M.,Bayston,R.,Brown,P.D.,Winship,P.D.,and
Reid,H.J.(2004).Silvernanoparticlesandpolymericmedicaldevices:anewapproachtopreventionofinfection?
J.Antimicrob.Chemother.54(6),1019–1024.PubMedhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh478
He, S., Joyce, D.C.,Irving, D.E., and Faragher, J.D. (2006). StemendblockageincutGrevillea,CrimsonYullo,in
inflorescences.PostharvestBiol.Technol.41(1),78–84http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.03.002.
Ho,L.C.,and Nichols, R. (1977). Translocationof 14C-sucrose inrelationtochangesincarbohydratecontentin
rosecorollascutatdifferentstagesofdevelopment.Ann.Bot.(Lond.)41,227–242.
Ichimura,Y.,Kumanomidou,T.,Sou,Y.S.,Mizushima,T.,Ezaki,J.,Ueno,T.,Kominami,E.,Yamane,T.,Tanaka,K.,and
Komatsu,M.(2008).Structuralbasisforsortingmechanismofp62inselectiveautophagy.J.Biol.Chem.283(33),
22847–22857.PubMedhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M802182200
Jowkar, M.M. (2006). Water relations and microbial proliferation in vase solutions of NarcissustazettaL.cv.
‘Shahla-e-Shiraz’asaffectedbybiocidecompounds.J.Hortic.Sci.Biotechnol.81(4),656–660http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/14620316.2006.11512120.
Jowkar, M.M. (2015). Effects of chlorination and acidification on postharvest physiological properties of
alstroemeria, cv. ‘Vanilla’ and on microbial contamination of vasesolution. J. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 56(4),
478–486http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13580-015-0022-4.
Jowkar,M.,Kafi,M.,Khalighi,A.,andHasanzadeh,N.(2012).Reconsiderationinusingcitricacidasvasesolution
preservativeforcutroseflowers.CurrentResearchJournalofBiologicalSciences.4,427–436.
9
Jowkar, M., Kafi, M., Khalighi, A., and Hasanzadeh, N. (2013). Nano silver application impact as vase solution
biocideonpostharvestmicrobialandphysiologicalpropertiesof‘CherryBrandy’rose.J.FoodAgric.Environ.11,
1045–1050.
Kim, J.-H., Lee, A.-K., and Suh, J.-K. (2005). Effect of certain pre-treatment substances on vase life and
physiological character in Liliumspp.ActaHortic.673, 307–314 http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.
2005.673.39.
Liu, J.P., He, S.G., Zhang, Z.Q., Cao, J.P., Lv, P.T., He, S.D., Cheng, G.P., and Joyce, D.C. (2009). Nanosilver pulse
treatmentsinhibitstem-endbacteria oncut gerberacv.Ruikouflowers.PostharvestBiol.Technol.54(1),59–62
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.05.004.
Lü,P.,Cao,J.,He,S.,Liu,J.,Li,H.,Cheng,G.,Ding, Y.,andJoyce,D.C.(2010).Nano-silverpulsetreatmentsimprove
water relations of cut rose cv. Movie star flowers. PostharvestBiol.Technol.57(3), 196–202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.04.003.
Mei-hua,F.,Jian-xin,W.,Shi,L.,Shi,G.,andFan,L.(2008).Salicylicacidand6-BAeffectsinshelf-lifeimprovement
of GerberaJamesonii cut flowers. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article-en/
CJFDTOTAL-BFYY200808060.htm.
Mohammadiju,S.,Jafararpoor, M.,andMohammadkhani,A.(2014). Betterment vaselifeandkeeping quality of
cutgerberaflowersbypost-harvestnanosilvertreatments.Intl.J.Farm&Alli.Sci.3,55–59.
Mori,I.C., Pinontoan,R., Kawano,T.,andMuto,S.(2001). Involvementofsuperoxidegenerationinsalicylicacid-
induced stomatal closure in Viciafaba. Plant Cell Physiol. 42(12), 1383–1388. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/
10.1093/pcp/pce176
Morones, J.R., Elechiguerra, J.L., Camacho, A., Holt, K., Kouri, J.B., Ramı́rez, J.T., and Yacaman, M.J. (2005). The
bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 16(10), 2346–2353. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/
10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059
Ohkawa,K.,Kasahara,Y.,andSuh,J.(1999).Mobilityandeffectsonvaselifeofsilvercontainingcompoundsincut
roseflowers.HortScience34,112–113.
Reid, M.S., Evanse,R.Y., and Dodge, L.L. (1989). Ethyleneand silver thiosulphate influence opening of cut rose
flowers.Hortic.Sci.114,436–440.
Sairam, R.K., Singh,D.V.,and Srivastava, G.C. (2003).Changes in activitiesofantioxidantenzymesinsunflower
leavesofdifferentages.Biol.Plant.47(1),61–66http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1027328814591.
SalehiSardoei, A.,Mohammadi,G.A.,and Rahbarian,P. (2013).Interactioneffect ofsalicylicacid andputrescine
onvaselifeofcutnarcissusflowers.InternationalJournalofAdvancedBiologicalandBiomedicalResearch1,
569–1576.
Serek, M., Tamari, G., Sisler, E.C., and Borochov, A. (1995). Inhibition of ethylene-induced cellular senescence
symptoms by 1-methylcyclopropene, a new inhibitor of ethylene action. Physiol. Plant. 94(2), 229–232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb05305.x.
Wang, L., Bao, X.M., Huang, B.Q., and Hao, S. (1998). Somatic embryogenic potential determined by the
morphologicalpolarityoftheexplantintissueculturesofFreesiarefracta.ActaBot.Sin.40,138–143.
Xu, C., Xu, Y., and Huang, B. (2008). Protein extraction for 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis of proteomic
profilinginturfgrass.CropSci.48(4),1608–1614http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.11.0624.
Zamani,S., Kazemi,M.,and Aran,M.(2011). Postharvestlife ofcutrose flowersas affectedbysalicylicacidand
glutamin.WorldAppl.Sci.J.12,1621–1624.
10