Technical ReportPDF Available

Why Children/Youth Drop Out of Sports

Authors:
Research Brief
Number 46/December 2016
Why Children/Youth Drop Out of Sports?
Tek B. Dangi and Peter A. Witt
“Kids join youth sports programs in droves -- and drop out in droves. (Indiana University, 2016)
It is estimated that over 38 million kids are involved in youth sports each year, and almost 75 percent
of American households with school-age children have at least one child participating in youth
sports (Williams, 2016). However, according to a variety of sport psychologists, youth development
scholars and practitioners, the rate of children dropping out of sports by the time they are 12 or 13,
and often earlier is a major concern (O'Sullivan, 2015; Wallace, 2016). Interestingly, studies of
youth sports participation and dropout rates in other countries show similar trends (Carlman,
Wagnsson, & Patriksson, 2013). The purpose of this brief is to discuss reasons why children drop
out of sports and possible ways to enhance and maintain sports participation.
Reasons Children/Youth Drop Out of Sports
Sports psychologists, youth development scholars, and practitioners (e.g., Carlman, Wagnsson, &
Patriksson, 2013; Gould, 2016; Kelley & Carchia, 2016; O'Sullivan, 2015; Wallace, 2016; Williams,
2016) have presented various reasons why children/youth drop out of sports. Crane & Temple (2015,
pp. 121-22) systematically reviewed factors associated with children and adolescents’ dropping out
of organized sports (the review covering 43 publications from Europe, North America and
Australia). They then used a model of recreation and leisure constraints to organize drop out reasons
under the three headings in the model: Intrapersonal, interpersonal and structural constraints.
Following their lead, several of the reasons for children and youth dropping out of sports are
presented below under the three constraints model headings.
Intrapersonal Constraints: Lack of enjoyment (not having fun, being bored); Low perceptions of
physical competence; Intrinsic Pressures (e.g. stress); and Perceptions of negative team dynamics
(negative feelings towards team or coach) (Crane & Temple, 2015, pp. 121-22).
Not having fun. According to a study by Kelley & Carchia (2016), 38% of girls and 39% of
boys suggest that lack of fun is the biggest reason for dropping out of sports. Dropping out may
be due to factors such as inflexible practice routines, and strict rules and guidelines which take
away the fun part of participating (O'Sullivan, 2015; Williams, 2016).
Anxiety and nervousness due to excessive criticism. Children can experience undue
criticism, and pressure from parents and coaches to perform their best, win every game,
compete so they can earn honors and recognition, and perhaps compete for college
scholarships. In these situations, children may enjoy the game less and suffer anxiety due to the
fear of making mistakes and may feel disrespected in terms of being appreciated for their
abilities, as opposed to the mistakes they make (O'Sullivan, 2015). In turn, this can lead to
feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt--I’m not good enough--which could carry over to other
life situations (Kelley & Carchia, 2016).
Pressure from the coaches or not getting along with coaches. Some coaches have poor
communication skills, autocratic or authoritarian styles of interacting with young athletes, and
are generally unable to relate to young athletes, which may lead athletes to choose to abandon
participation (Fraser-Thomas, Côté, & Deakin, 2008). Coaches may also pressure athletes to
concentrate on only one sport, which can cause ill-will and create an uncomfortable
atmosphere for the athlete (The Ultimate Sports Parents, 2016; Wallace, 2016).
Interpersonal Constraints: Pressure (family, coach, peers); Other social priorities; Having other
things to do; and Pursuit of an alternative sport (Crane & Temple, 2015, pp. 121-22).
Parental pressures and loss of ownership. Many children are introduced to sports by their
parents, and often only continue participation because of pressure exerted by their parents (The
Ultimate Sports Parents, 2016). In some cases, children are pressured to participate because
their parents are living out their own fantasies through their children, or the parents gain status
or recognition from their children’s participation. Often children feel pressured to succeed
because they do not want to let their parents down or disappoint them (Fraser-Thomas, Côté, &
Deakin, 2008; Wallace, 2016). Excessive parental involvement and guidance can lead children
to feeling a lack of ownership of their own motivations or sport participation experiences
(O'Sullivan, 2015).
Not having enough time to participate in other age appropriate activities. Deep, structured
involvement with one activity may take about time from socializing, hanging out, being with
friends, interacting with members of the opposite sex. This may be especially critical in the
decisions of children once they reach middle school (Carlman, Wagnsson, & Patriksson, 2013).
In a similar manner, excessive pressure to be involved in sports may actually take away time
from studying, getting good grades and keeping up with one’s academics (Kelley & Carchia,
2016). Finally, our current sports model may not support older children’s desire to play just for
the fun of it. Thus, only children who can advance to the elite level of participation will be
encouraged to participate and others will be encouraged to find alternative activities (Miner,
2016).
Structural Constraints: Time (for training and travel); Injuries; Cost; and Inadequate facilities
(Crane & Temple, 2015, pp. 121-22).
Sports related injuries: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
between 2001 and 2009 approximately 2.7 million kids under 20 were treated for sports and
recreation injuries (Kelley & Carchia, 2016), including a dramatic increase in head injuries.
Football concussions among 10- to 14-year-olds more than doubled from 2000 to 2010.
According to Williams (2016): “Each year, more than 3.5 million young athletes experience a
sports injury severe enough to warrant medical attention, …and approximately 66 percent of
these injuries are serious enough to require attention in the emergency department” (para. 5).
Some kids recover and return to the sports, but many do not. Kids or parents do not want to
take further risks.
Overuse/Burn out: Intensive, repetitive use of certain body parts for specific sports has been
associated with overuse of muscles or muscle ruptures (Wallace, 2016). O'Sullivan (2015)
noted that many children are asked or pressured through families and coaches to undertake
more and more practicea factor that can lead to burnout and eventual dropout.
Not being given playing time. Some coaching practices and game decisions focus on giving
the best players maximum playing time, with the main focus being on winning. These
decisions, however, may drive some players with lesser abilities off teams or out of sports
entirely (Fraser-Thomas, Côté, & Deakins, 2008; O'Sullivan, 2015).
Feeling that participation is too structured and there is not enough time for free play or
just being a kid: When sports revolve around rigorous schedules, other directed involvement,
and strict adherence to rules, children may feel a loss of autonomy and spontaneity. They
may miss the simple pleasures of playing a pickup game in the park with friends without adult
structured pressure and adherence to rules and procedures not endorsed by the children
themselves (Williams, 2016).
Financial constraints: Many sports require a considerable financial investment for on-going
participation. Costs alone may lead children from poor communities to not participate
initially or cease participation if costs cannot be covered (Kelley & Carchia, 2016; Miner,
2016) Year-round training, equipment costs, coaching fees, camps, tournament, and travel
related costs can eat into a family’s budget and be a determining factor in whether some
children can start or continue.
Despite findings such as lack of fun element, sports injury, burn out and other factors causing sports
dropouts, Kelley & Carchia (2016) also thought it as a temporary phenomenon. They found in other
studies that 33 percent of kids had restarted a sport they'd quit, which gives options for re-attracting
kids to sports by minimizing such obstacles or offering multiple sports options. It is also supported
by Carlman, Wagnsson, & Patriksson’s (2013) study that many school athletes who dropped out of
sports will reenter the same or different sports/clubs later on.
Suggestions to Minimize Sports Drop Outs and Increase Youth Engagement
Based on past and current research and practices, various suggestions to minimize sports attrition
have been offered.
Redefine sports goal away from winning towards having fun. Parents and coaches should
redefine success in terms of keeping participation as fun as possible, with attention to enabling
participants to develop lifetime skills as opposed to a win at all costs philosophy (Wallace, 2016).
Further, less emphasis should be placed on sports participation as a means for winning college
scholarships since the number of young participants who will actually earn their way to college
through an athletic scholarship is very low. Emphasis should be put on enabling participants to have
a sense of fun and trying their best, while being treated respectfully by coaches, parents and
teammates, and getting playing time (O’Sullivan, 2015).
Balance parental involvement. Parental support and involvement is crucial for kids’ sports success
in terms of providing leadership, support and investment. However, over-involvement such as
instructing players from the sidelines, arguing with coaches and referees, and criticizing kids for
mistakes has taken away sports’ joys from kids. Children should have the ownership of the game and
the game experience (Samuels, 2016). Parents should be encouraged to offer encouragement to all
players, and encouraged to assess whether their own behavior is contributing to a respectful sports
atmosphere for their children, including being quiet on the ride home, cheering positively, and not
yelling at the referees (O'Sullivan, 2015; Wallace, 2016).
Encourage multiple sport participation. Parents should encourage children to play multiple sports
before the age of 12 and give children a strong voice about the sports they choose to participate in
(Wallace, 2016).
Enable children to have autonomy and ownership over game experiences. Parents should enable
children to make choices about their level of participation, e.g., recreational vs. competitive (The
Ultimate Sports Parents, 2016) and encourage children to have a voice and decision making power
over their use of time and the activities in which they chose to participate (Samuels, 2016). Parents
should also encourage time for children to just be children, by promoting involvement in impromptu
pick-up games or just playing in the park with friends.
Encourage rules that give every child a chance to play. Coaches should provide playing
opportunities for all children and opportunities that can help maximize each child’s on-the-field
potential (O'Sullivan, 2015; Samuels, 2016). For most younger players, no youth trophy is worth
sitting on the bench.
Decrease parental pressure about winning. Emphasis should be placed on developing a child-
friendly atmosphere and achievable expectations, with an emphasis on fundamental skills
development and enjoyment instead of competition or winning. Children’s fear that they have to be
the best, or they have failed, should be replaced by the reality that failure is a necessary part of the
development process (Samuels, 2016).
Parents should avoid living their sports dreams through their children. Many parents play out
their own fantasies about sports through their children’s activities (Indiana University, 2016).
Children become commodities to be managed and promoted, as opposed to promoting the full
development of the child, with respect for the child’s feelings, goals and wishes. As noted by Miner
(2016), “…until we dismantle the parenting culture that emphasizes achievement and success over
healthy, happy kids, we don’t stand a chance of solving [the youth sports problem]” (para. 15).
Sport participation should begin at an appropriate age. Parents should avoid pushing their
children into specializing in a single sport, being on traveling teams, or having their lives dominated
by sports, especially before the age of 12. Parents need to lessen their own fear that their children
will fall behind if they are not part of early sport specialization (Wallace, 2016). Excessive play and
practice should also be avoided to decrease injuries due to overuse, burnout, and long-term physical
consequences (Samuels, 2016).
Côté & Hancock (2016) captured many of these ideas in their Developmental Model of Sport
Participation (DMSP), which emphasizes balancing performance, participation and personal
development in youth sports involvements. Their recommendations are particularly suitable for
children under the age of 13.
Regulate length of season to 3 or 4 months, with a maximum of 6 months.
Limit lengthy travel to organized competitions.
Introduce ‘grass-roots’ sport programs that focus on trying different sports.
Do not implement a selection process of more ‘talented’ children until the specialization
years.
Provide healthy competitive opportunities, but do not overemphasize winning and long-term
outcomes such as championships.
Discourage early specialization in one sport.
Allow children to play all positions in a given sport.
Promote deliberate play within and beyond organized sport.
Design play and practice activities that focus on fun and short-term rewards.
Understand children’s needs and do not ‘over coach.’
The DMSP also proposes three stages of sport development:
sampling (age 6-12 when athletes participate in variety of sports);
specializing (age 1315 with decreasing number of sports);
investment years (age 16+) (Fraser-Thomas, Côté, & Deakin 2008, p. 646).
Conclusions and Implications
Youth sports participation holds positive potential for enabling the development of children and
youth. However, there has been a growing emphasis among parents, coaches, and youth participants
on commodifying sport as an arena for winning, status, and living out parental and coaches, rather
than players’ dreams. In many situations, parents and coaches need to rethink their motivations and
their goals and become more youth development focused as they pursue sport involvements for
children and youth. For example, Wallace (2016) notes that in some instances, “Kids are telling us
this is not for me. It might be for you, but it's really not meeting our needs" (para. 8). Luckily, there
is a lot of current attention to these issues and many useful suggestions are available for parents and
coaches to follow. Careful guidance and actions from parents and coaches are critical to the
evaluation of benefits and downsides of early sports involvement and ways to decrease instances of
children dropping out, burning out, or suffering injuries.
References
Carlman, P., Wagnsson, S., & Patriksson, G. (2013). Causes and consequences of dropping out from
organized youth sports. Swedish Journal of Sport Research, 2(1), 26-54.
Côté, J., & Hancock, D. J. (2016). Evidence-based policies for youth sport programs. International
Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(1), 51-65
Crane, J., & Temple, V. (2015). A systematic review of dropout from organized sport among
children and youth. European physical education review, 21(1), 114-131.
Fraser-Thomas, J., Côté, J., & Deakin, J. (2008). Understanding dropout and prolonged engagement
in adolescent competitive sport. Psychology of sport and exercise, 9(5), 645-662.
Gould, D. (2016). Why do kids drop out of sports? Positive Challenge Alliance. Retrieved from
http://devzone.positivecoach.org/resource/video/why-do-kids-drop-out-sports
Indiana University. (2016). Why kids ditch youth sports. Retrieved from
http://newsinfo.iu.edu/web/page/normal/3885.html
Kelley, B., & Carchia, C. (2013). "Hey, data -- swing!" ESPN. Retrieved from
http://www.espn.com/espn/story/_/id/9469252/hidden-demographics-youth-sports-espn-
magazine
Miner, J. W. (2016) Why 70 percent of kids quit sports by age 13. The Washington Post. Retrieved
from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/parenting/wp/2016/06/01/why-70-percent-of-kids-
quit-sports-by-age-13/
O'Sullivan, J. (2015) Why Kids Quit Sports. Changing the Game Project. Retrieved from
http://changingthegameproject.com/why-kids-quit-sports/
Samuels, D. (2016). 7 reasons kids quit sports, and what it means for coaches. Football Scoop.
Retrieved from http://footballscoop.com/news/7-reasons-kids-quit-sports-and-what-it-means-for-
coaches/
The Ultimate Sports Parents (2016). Why pressure causes sports kids to drop out. Retrieved from
http://www.youthsportspsychology.com/why-pressure-causes-sports-kids-to-drop-out/
Wallace, K. (2016). How to make your kid hate sports without really trying. CNN. Retrieved from
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/21/health/kids-youth-sports-parents/
Williams, T. (2016). Reasons Why Kids Drop Out of Sports. Our Everyday Life. Retrieved from
http://oureverydaylife.com/reasons-kids-drop-out-sports-10440.html
If you have a particular topic that you would like the YDI staff to
address or have comments about this research brief email us at
ydi@tamu.edu. See other Sequor YDI research briefs and other
materials at ydi.tamu.edu
... Given the high dropout rates from PA these days [23][24][25], one of the most notable benefits of exergaming is its potential to increase the number of individuals who maintain regular PA [26,27]. In fact, Silva et al. [1] showed that exergaming provides the same acute effects in physiological variables as conventional exercises, being a reliable way to improve one's lifestyle. ...
Article
Full-text available
1) Background: The popularity of motion-sensing computer-based games, like virtual reality (VR) exergames, is increasing among adolescents. However, their efficacy compared to conven-tional physical training methods remains unclear. This study investigated whether VR exergames produce effects on reaction time (RT) comparable to traditional tennis training in school-aged adolescents. (2) Methods: 130 adolescents (mean age: 15.6 ± 2.0 years; 67 boys: 15.5 ± 2.2 years; 63 girls: 15.7 ± 1.8 years) were recruited in schools and assigned to one of three groups: VR exer-game (G1, n = 39), tennis training (G2, n = 25), and a control (G3, n = 66). Participants' RT was evaluated before and after the interventions. G1 engaged in VR exergames for 8 minutes, G2 un-derwent traditional tennis training for 30 minutes, and G3 did not participate in any physical ac-tivity. (3) Results: Indicated that in the G3, girls exhibited slower RTs compared to boys (p < 0.0). No differences were observed in RTs when comparing the G1 and the G2. (4) Conclusions: Sex appeared to influence RT, with girls showing slower RTs than boys in the G3. The findings sug-gest that VR exergames and traditional tennis training have similar impacts on the RT. This in-dicates the potential of VR exergames as an alternative to conventional physical training for im-proving RT in adolescents.
... Finally, young athletes name fun as one of their main reasons for playing sports (Bailey et al., 2013; The Aspen Institute, 2019a) and continuing their sport participation (Visek et al., 2020). Therefore, fun is an element of youth sports often discussed as paramount to reducing dropout (Visek et al., 2020;Witt & Dangi, 2018) and understanding social motivation (Allen, 2003). However, due to the individualistic nature of sport and the variety of participation contexts, perceptions and definitions of fun can vary for both young athletes (Bailey et al., 2013) and coaches (Bengoechea et al., 2004). ...
Article
In the youth sports domain, few coaches are women, masculine ideologies permeate the culture, and coaching practices do not always align with behaviors supportive of positive youth sports experience. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in men’s and women’s coaching behaviors associated with creating positive youth sports experience, including behaviors that create a safe and fun participation environment, a mastery motivational climate, and autonomy-supportive coaching. A total of 219 youth and high school coaches across different sports in one county in a western state responded to the survey—29% of them women. Along with the overall dearth of women in coaching, we found differences between men and women in the types of coaching positions they hold and the behaviors they bring to their coaching. Female coaches were more likely to be paid, primarily part-time, and they were also less likely to have children. Using a multivariate analysis of variance, significant mean vectors were found between female and male coaches in the four coaching behaviors measured. Women’s ratings were significantly higher on individual measures for autonomy and safety. As the coaching field comes to better understand the approaches that lead to positive youth sports experience, these findings raise important questions about why women and mothers are not a larger proportion of the coaching landscape and how that might change.
Article
Full-text available
Background/Objectives: The concept of educational systems thinking shows the rugby educational system as a network of multiple interactive and interconnected elements. However, the frameworks presented in the literature for developing sports practice through an educational vision and multisport engagement do not always have direct transferability to instructors’ training courses. The study aims to evaluate the correlation between rugby instructors’ methodological and didactical competencies and compare them with children’s motor competence and psychological aspects. Methods: Two hundred twenty children (9.6 ± 1.1 years) and 50 instructors (39.0 ± 13.6 years) were enrolled. Instructors’ competencies were investigated during the internship through evaluation sheets, questionnaires, and video analysis. Children’s motor competence and psychological aspects were investigated through motor tests, questionnaires, and video analysis. Results: The correlation between methodological competencies and didactical-communicative competencies showed a positive significance, especially regarding production styles. Motor competence and play skills in children showed poor results. The group of instructors with more methodological competencies (a greater number of teaching styles used) showed a strong correlation between motor competence and psychological aspects. Conclusions: For successful teaching, knowledge of specific technical skills is not enough, and it is important to consider all the factors (in particular, the teaching-communicative and methodological skills) that contribute most to instructors’ skills.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to examine athlete engagement and its relationships with indicators of the quality of the athlete’s sport experience, exploring potential differences according to gender, age, and competitive level. Furthermore, this study validated the Athlete Engagement Questionnaire (AEQ) in young athletes and confirmed its factor structure. A total of 1188 athletes (43.90% girls) from Argentina participated in the study, with a mean age of 15.92 (SD = 2.50). The participants completed the AEQ along with other measures of athletes’ quality of experience, such as motivation, enjoyment, and burnout. This study confirmed the multidimensional nature of engagement, showing positive associations with high-quality athlete experiences and revalidating the inverse relationship with burnout. Moreover, the study found differences in engagement dimensions (i.e., confidence, vigor, dedication, and enthusiasm) based on the interplay of gender, age, and competitive level. In general, male athletes, younger athletes, and those with a higher competitive level showed more engagement and interactions between these sociodemographic variables. The Argentinian version of AEQ exhibited optimal fit and reliability and good indexes of measurement invariance across gender, age, and competitive level. These findings validate the AEQ as a reliable tool for evaluating sport engagement among adolescents in Argentina. Engagement constitutes an indicator of an optimal experience linked to positive youth development through sports participation.
Article
Issue addressed: Regular physical activity is important for children's health. Parkrun supports communities to deliver free, weekly, 5 km events in 22 countries around the world and is the largest physical activity model delivered at scale in the world. Junior parkrun aims to encourage children aged 4-14 years to be active outdoors through providing safe, cost-free and non-competitive weekly timed walk, run or jog over a 2-km distance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the junior parkrun pilot in Australia. Methods: A process evaluation was conducted using routinely collected data of junior parkrun participants, as well as a self-completed questionnaire. Results: A total of 1827 children had registered and participated in at least one junior parkrun over the course of the pilot period. Participants had, on average, attended 10% of the junior parkrun events including and subsequent to their first participation by the end of the study period. Majority of parents (61%) said that junior parkrun had increased their child's physical activity either a little or a lot, and most agreed or strongly agreed that junior parkrun was fun (90%), enjoyable (91%), energising (85%) and challenging (70%). Conclusion: The junior parkrun pilot appears to show promise in Australia for enabling children to engage in physical activity, in their local communities in a fun and inclusive way. So what: Parkrun junior can co-exist with other organised sports programs; however, it can also specifically target those not participating in any sports, given the high levels of enjoyment in a non-competitive, non-team environment.
Article
Previous research looking into youth sport coaching indicates that a majority of coaches may also be a parent to an athlete on their team. While previous studies have also sought to understand how being a parent–coach might affect parents’ relationships with their own child(ren), little work appears to explore how occupying this role might affect an individual’s ability to remain effective as a coach. As such, 14 parent–coaches were interviewed to examine how they perceived their dual role to influence their coaching effectiveness and to hear what strategies they used to remain effective. Interviews were analyzed thematically, and findings indicated that parent–coaches have few formalized resources to aid them in navigating the issues associated with their challenging dual-role position. More support would be welcomed by this population to improve their effectiveness and to ensure that all developing athletes in their care continue to have positive experiences within the youth sport environment.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to investigate dropout and continuation motives among boys in youth football. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all players from a former football team, consisting of 13 young people who were 17 years old when the in-depth interviews were conducted. Short interviews with the same players five years earlier (at the age of 12) were also included as part of the data. This strategy was used to gain a longitudinal perspective and a better insight into the participants' experience of organized football. Including in-depth data from all players at a football team-both players that dropped out and continued playing football, and also including some short interviews data from a longitudinal perspective, this study bring new findings into the discussion about sport participation. When the in-depth interviews were conducted, six of the participants had dropped out of football, while seven were still active. The results show that social factors, ambition, other interests and differences in skill and physical development, were all reasons for dropout from this team. Among those who continued playing football, the social aspect of football, their love for the sport, competitive instinct and the training benefits the sport provided, were reasons they continued playing. Furthermore, the findings showed that those who reported the lowest ambitions at the age of twelve, had dropped out of football, while the one with the highest ambitions had continued playing football. Our findings indicate that ambition can be a crucial factor in relation to participation in football, and also that the social aspect of football is an important motivational factor that coaches and parents should be aware of.
Article
Full-text available
In ultimate games governed by the World Flying Disc Federation (WFDF), all competitors also take on the role of referee. The players discuss disputed calls with each other during the game, and then follow rules designed for these situations to determine how the play continues. The number one rule of the sport is to respect the spirit of the game (SOTG), which encourages competitive play while preserving mutual respect and minimizing the risk of injury. The use of SOTG in ultimate in the framework of self-arbitration as a moral practice aligns well with other tools of critical pedagogy. For this study, the SOTG scores of the WFDF Joint Junior Ultimate Championship (JJUC 2022) were analyzed. A total of 1009 players from 19 countries competed in 434 self-refereed games (29 national teams in the WJUC Under-20 (U20) tournament and 20 teams in the EYUC Under-17 (U17) tournament). All the scores from the individual criteria correlated well with the overall scores, but for the most part, they did not correlate with each other. Our experience with the scoring system has highlighted the importance of participants understanding the meaning of the results and how they may lead to a constructive reflection to improve exceptions, including scores representing fouls and rules knowledge. The findings provide important information for physical education teachers, coaches, and sport consultants and may be of use to design SOTG programs that could foster the experience of sportsmanship and to facilitate the ethical conduct of athletes in either recreative or in competitive contexts.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Physical activity has been shown to have a positive effect on life satisfaction in adolescents. Despite these benefits, physical activity levels constantly drop during adolescence, suggesting potential interfering factors in this link. Since worries about physical appearance are an important issue at this age, this study aims to examine the relationship between physical activity and life satisfaction in adolescents and explores possible moderating effects of social physique anxiety and sex. Methods: We used data from a longitudinal study with N = 864 vocational students (mean age = 17.87 years, range: 16-25, 43% female) from Switzerland. To test our hypotheses, we used multiple hierarchical regression analyses as well as simple slope analyses. Results: We did not find a significant direct effect of physical activity on life satisfaction. However, we found a significant two-way interaction between physical activity and social physique anxiety. An additional significant three-way interaction occurred, indicating that a positive effect of physical activity on life satisfaction holds only for female adolescents with low social physique anxiety levels. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of developing a healthy relationship with one's body to fully benefit from physical activity, especially for female adolescents. Taken together, these results reveal important considerations for physical activity educators.
Article
Full-text available
Collegiate athletes are valuable assets of the University. Their athletic performance requires a high level of competitiveness to achieve commendable record standing; thus, nutrition plays an important role. Their dietary habits and how knowledgeable they are about proper nutrition are the primary concern of this study that will probably affect their performance. The purpose of the study is to determine if there is a relationship between Dietary Habits and Nutritional Knowledge. Also, to investigate if these two variables serve as a predictor of Athletic Performance among selected UST collegiate athletes. The descriptive- Correlational design was used in the study. Respondents were identified using the purposive sampling technique and stratified random sampling. 100 Team A selected collegiate athletes from the University of Santo Tomas who participated in the UAAP Season '80 were surveyed and completed a Dietary Habits and Nutritional Knowledge Questionnaire developed by Paugh (2005). Data were analyzed using Regression and Pearson Correlation Coefficient at an alpha level of .05. The results revealed that respondents practiced good dietary habits and had a good knowledge of nutrition with a General Weighted Mean of 2.70 and 3.02, respectively. There is a significant relationship between dietary habits and nutritional knowledge. Dietary habit predicts athletic performance while nutritional knowledge does not predict athletic performance.The researchers highly recommend the full support/assistance of Coaches/Athletic Trainers/ Sports Conditioning Coach, and Parents in guiding the nutritional diet of student-athlete and the availability of Sport Dietician to implement a dietary plan for student-athletes to reach their optimal athletic performance. Keywords: Dietary Habits, Nutritional Knowledge, Athletic Performance, Collegiate Athletes, Nutrition
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study is to examine dropout reasons and various types of dropouts in relation to demographic variables, various types of sports, physical activity, and underlying motivational processes. Retrospective data was collected from three cohorts including 1,176 participants, of which 712 stated that they had sometimes dropped out of organized sport. Findings showed that time-related reasons were the primary causes for dropping out. It was also revealed that athletes with low versus high levels of perceived physical competence dropped out to a higher extent because of experiencing too much pressure, and athletes reporting low versus high social competence withdrew to a higher extent because they did not like their teammates. Results also showed that girls with a foreign background had a higher rate of dropouts compared to boys with the same background. Girls with foreign backgrounds were also found to be less physically active after dropping out from organized sports.
Article
Full-text available
Leisure constraints theory was used as a framework to systematically review factors associated with dropout of organized sport among children and adolescents. Keyword searches for the population, context and construct of interest (i.e. dropout) identified articles from the entire contents of the following databases: Academic Search Complete, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus. The initial search yielded 557 studies, and 43 met the selection criteria. Most studies focused solely on adolescents, and 89% of participants were male. Most studies were cross-sectional using quantitative approaches. Almost 30 different sports were included in the reviewed studies; however, the most represented sports were soccer, swimming, gymnastics and basketball. Findings from this review indicated that intrapersonal and interpersonal constraints are more frequently associated with dropping out of sport than structural constraints. Although many discrete factors associated with dropout were identified, five major areas emerged: lack of enjoyment, perceptions of competence, social pressures, competing priorities and physical factors (maturation and injuries). Rarely were the interrelationships between factors or the underlying dimensions of factors examined. Future research would benefit from mixed-methods and prospective approaches. These approaches would allow children and youth to explain how their experience of sport shaped their motives to dropout and allow researchers to probe the extent to which affordances and motives for participation aligned with athletes’ reasons for dropping out.
Article
Youth sport involvement can lead to outcomes classified as the 3Ps: performance, participation and personal development. The 3Ps are central to youth sport systems aimed at providing quality experiences to participants. A challenge for countries and national governing bodies is structuring sport to simultaneously facilitate the achievement of excellence and participation or the 3Ps. To illustrate this challenge, consider deliberate practice, which is an important activity for performance improvements, but also considered less enjoyable and less motivating compared to other sport activities, such as play. Thus, governing bodies often face the challenge of deciding which activities they intend to emphasize (e.g., early specialization directed at talent development or early diversification aimed at increasing participation), and this can have implications for the success/failure of the 3Ps. The purpose of this article is to describe an inclusive sport structure for children (under age 13) targeting the development of the 3Ps, which would be an asset to sport scientists, policymakers and practitioners. Common goals for the 3Ps include the following: avoid burnout/dropout, cultivate intrinsic motivation and maximize involvement in various sport activities. Our contention is the 3Ps can coexist under one system when that system is structured according to the age and competitive level of participants. The Developmental Model of Sport Participation and its seven postulates will be used as the basis of this article to provide evidence-based policies for children in sport.
Article
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to gain understanding of training patterns and roles of significant others (i.e. coaches, parents, peers, and siblings) in adolescent swimmers’ sport participation patterns. Design: The developmental model of sport participation [Côté, J., Baker, J., & Abernethy, B. (2003). From play to practice: A developmental framework for the acquisition of expertise in team sport. In J. Starkes, & K. A. Ericsson (Eds.), Recent advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 89–114). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; Côté, J., & Fraser-Thomas, J. (2007). Youth involvement in sport. In P. R. E. Crocker (Ed.), Introduction to sport psychology: A Canadian perspective (pp. 266–294). Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall] was used as a framework.Method: Ten dropout and 10 engaged swimmers, matched on key demographic variables participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview.Results: Groups had many similar experiences (e.g. early training, supportive and unsupportive coaches, involved parents). However, only dropouts spoke of early peak performances, limited one-on-one coaching, pressuring parents during adolescence, lack of swimming peers during adolescence, and sibling rivalries. In contrast, only engaged athletes spoke of clubs’ developmental philosophies, coaches’ and parents’ open communication, school friends’ support, and siblings’ general positive influences.Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of appropriately structured programs and the fragility of athletes’ relationships with significant others during the adolescent years. Implications for sport programmers, coaches, and parents are discussed.
Why kids ditch youth sports Retrieved from httpHey, data --swing!" ESPN. Retrieved from httphidden-demographics-youth-sports-espn- magazine Miner Why 70 percent of kids quit sports by age 13. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https
  • D Gould
  • B Kelley
  • C Carchia
Gould, D. (2016). Why do kids drop out of sports? Positive Challenge Alliance. Retrieved from http://devzone.positivecoach.org/resource/video/why-do-kids-drop-out-sports Indiana University. (2016). Why kids ditch youth sports. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.iu.edu/web/page/normal/3885.html Kelley, B., & Carchia, C. (2013). "Hey, data --swing!" ESPN. Retrieved from http://www.espn.com/espn/story/_/id/9469252/hidden-demographics-youth-sports-espn- magazine Miner, J. W. (2016) Why 70 percent of kids quit sports by age 13. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/parenting/wp/2016/06/01/why-70-percent-of-kids- quit-sports-by-age-13/
Reasons Why Kids Drop Out of Sports. Our Everyday Life
  • T Williams
Williams, T. (2016). Reasons Why Kids Drop Out of Sports. Our Everyday Life. Retrieved from http://oureverydaylife.com/reasons-kids-drop-out-sports-10440.html If you have a particular topic that you would like the YDI staff to address or have comments about this research brief email us at ydi@tamu.edu. See other Sequor YDI research briefs and other materials at ydi.tamu.edu
Why Kids Quit Sports. Changing the Game Project. Retrieved from http://changingthegameproject.com/why-kids-quit-sports
  • O ' Sullivan
O'Sullivan, J. (2015) Why Kids Quit Sports. Changing the Game Project. Retrieved from http://changingthegameproject.com/why-kids-quit-sports/
7 reasons kids quit sports, and what it means for coaches
  • D Samuels
Samuels, D. (2016). 7 reasons kids quit sports, and what it means for coaches. Football Scoop. Retrieved from http://footballscoop.com/news/7-reasons-kids-quit-sports-and-what-it-means-forcoaches/
How to make your kid hate sports without really trying
  • K Wallace
Wallace, K. (2016). How to make your kid hate sports without really trying. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/21/health/kids-youth-sports-parents/
Why do kids drop out of sports? Positive Challenge Alliance
  • D Gould
Gould, D. (2016). Why do kids drop out of sports? Positive Challenge Alliance. Retrieved from http://devzone.positivecoach.org/resource/video/why-do-kids-drop-out-sports Indiana University. (2016). Why kids ditch youth sports. Retrieved from http://newsinfo.iu.edu/web/page/normal/3885.html