ArticlePDF Available

Case Study of a Multinational Firm

Authors:
  • Al Dar University College

Abstract and Figures

This primary Job Analysis was developed for a Private multinational company in Canada with global operations in UK, USA, EUROPE, AUSTRALIA and the MIDDLE EAST. It is aimed at developing an effective Recruitment and Selection system based on an accurate, detailed, thorough and thoughtful job analysis for a 'requisite' position that of a customer care representative. Author has followed a Functional Job Analysis methodology based on a Canadian Standards approved Job Fact sheet, Job Analysis Questionnaire, and a Task Statements' sheet using which job duties, job statements and job specifications were identified. Key Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Other Attributes from the task inventory and task statements were derived. The Job Analysis not only assures Managers that valid selection instruments can be developed based on Job Analysis, but also showed them how systematic selection decisions can be made based on Job Analysis approaches adopted in this research.
Content may be subject to copyright.
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
204
July
2016
Case Study of a Multinational Firm
Dr. Sunitha Kshatriya*
Abstract
This primary Job Analysis was developed for a Private multinational company in Canada with
global operations in UK, USA, EUROPE, AUSTRALIA and the MIDDLE EAST. It is aimed at
developing an effective Recruitment and Selection system based on an accurate, detailed,
thorough and thoughtful job analysis for a ‘requisite’ position that of a customer care
representative. Author has followed a Functional Job Analysis methodology based on a Canadian
Standards approved Job Fact sheet, Job Analysis Questionnaire, and a Task Statements’ sheet
using which job duties, job statements and job specifications were identified. Key Knowledge,
Skills, Abilities and Other Attributes from the task inventory and task statements were derived.
The Job Analysis not only assures Managers that valid selection instruments can be developed
based on Job Analysis, but also showed them how systematic selection decisions can be made
based on Job Analysis approaches adopted in this research.
Key Words: Functional Job Analysis, KSAO’s (Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, Attributes),
Task Statement, Task Inventory, Job-Fit, Critical Statements
* Department of Business Administration,Al Dar University College
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
205
July
2016
1. Introduction:
The goal of this research is a through, accurate, detailed and thoughtful job analysis aiming for a
perfect organization and job fit for an requisite position within a private Canadian multinational
organization by evaluating the right task and contextual behaviors required in a job. A person-
organization fit was carried out to ‘assess potential employees in terms of their fit with both the
job and the organization to ensure that the job candidate fits with the organization’s values and
culture and to have the contextual attributes desired by the organization’ (Catano, V.M.,
Wiesner,W.H., Heckett,R.D., Methot,L.L., & Belcourt, M. (2010) Recruitment and Selection in
Canada p. 243. The ‘requisite’ position chosen in the multinational company was of a Customer
Care Representative and the job description (JD) taken was a standardized JD based on Canadian
National Occupation Code (NOC). Job analysis is an effective and a thorough technique of
gathering data about all aspects of a job including but not limited to important tasks performed
on the job, the knowledge, skills and abilities required to perform the job, the physical abilities
needed to do the job, the environmental conditions within which an employee performs the job,
and typical working incidents, supervisory responsibilities, etc., Catano et al. (2010). Data
gathered and analyzed through job analysis helps in designing job descriptions and job
specification and used in a variety of other HR functions including preparing job classification,
job evaluations, selection and recruitment, performance appraisal and training, incentive pay and
compensation, improving work conditions, charting lines of responsibilities and so on.
Job analysis not only helps the employer effectively recruit and screen applicants based on
correct job related criteria but also helps in determining what tests can be administered to select
or promote, based on the knowledge, skills and abilities and other abilities (KSAO) identified
through the process of job analysis for the job. Job Analysis gives managers a legally defensible
tool against pleas of discrimination against protected groups, when hiring and selection decisions
including performance appraisal and other HR decision related to pay increases, promotion,
training etc are based on job analysis. The US and Canadian guidelines on Employee Selection
stipulate that JA is a crucial step in validating all personnel activities. Merritt-Haston and
Wexley (1983) conducted an analysis of court cases involving minimum educational
requirements. They found that employers who set minimum educational requirements were
likely to win a court case when the jobs were highly technical, or the jobs involved risk to the
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
206
July
2016
safety of the public, or jobs required advanced knowledge. Employers were also successful if
they could demonstrate evidence of criterion-related and content-related validity for these
requirements. All of this is achieved through conducting a job analyses that can demonstrate
these 6 factors - that the job is highly technical, involves the safety of the public, requires
advanced knowledge, or entails performance that is linked to education requirements (criterion-
related validity). The above highlight the importance of research on job analysis.
2. Literature review:
Job analysis is ‘one of the most widely used organizational data collection techniques’
(Morgeson & Campion, 1997). Schultz & Schultz, (1998, p.74) defined Job analysis as ‘the
study of a job to describe in specific terms the nature of the component tasks performed by the
worker’. Brannick and Levine (2002) defined the job analysis as ‘an organized process whereby
the nature of a job is discovered. Job or task is divided into smaller units’. ‘Job analysis is any
systematic procedure by which one describes the way a job is performed, the tasks that constitute
a job, and/or the skills and abilities necessary to perform a job’, Friedman, Lee; Harvey, Robert
J. (1986). Byars & Rue, (2006) discussed that the backbone of most human resource activities is
Job analysis, which can serve a number of functions. Job analysis is thus key to Recruitment,
Selection, Orientation, Training, Career Development, Counseling, Health, Safety, Performance
Management and Compensation. Competency with regards to job analysis is a list of tasks,
duties, responsibilities, knowledge, skills, and abilities that a person must have in order to be
sufficiently competent at a given position, Bodnarchuk (2012). Competency modeling has also
replaced traditional job analysis in many organizational human resource applications Sanchez &
Levine(2009). Nankarvis et al. (2002) have presented a strategic model for HRM clearly
depicting the strategic association between Job Design and Performance Management. The fact
is that through job analysis, two important documents i.e. Job Description and Job Specification
are developed, which set the bases for Performance Management. However, Job Analysis must
be done under the light of the overall organizational strategy that is derived from overall
organizational objectives and goals. Jones et al. (2001) suggest that ‘a job analysis should tell
you what KSA’s are necessary for someone performing a job’. Knowledge and skills that can be
easily taught and that are very specific to the job are knowledge and skills that should be
included in training, while more stable individual characteristics such as mechanical and
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
207
July
2016
cognitive abilities should be the basis for screening applicants. Levine and Sanchez (2007) even
suggested the term job analysis be replaced with the more appropriate term ‘work’ analysis to
address criticisms of the process. Therefore, there is a need for further research on the topic of
accuracy in job analyses. According to Brannick & Levine (2002), how many task statements
might be generated for a job, or a set of points to consider when interviewing incumbents, but
more of the former, because different situations do in fact call for different job analysis
approaches. Visser et. al., (1997) studied in Psychology literature that ‘core competencies were
characteristically unoriginal by means of various job analysis methods. Job performance may be
defined as how glowing the job is being completed as per well-known standard operating
procedures’. According to Clifford (1994), an effective growth program for an organization
cannot be formed without performing a job analysis. There are several reasons why this is true
including that an organization will not know where it needs to grow and how much it can
effectively grow without these procedures. Patrick and Moore (1985) wrote that it is an
important requirement that data from a job analysis reliably describe a job, yet little attention has
been paid to this topic of accuracy. Job analysis answers the questions of what tasks, performed
in what manner, make up a job. Outputs of this analytical study include: (a) a list of the job tasks;
(b) details of how each task is performed; (c) statements describing the responsibility, job
knowledge, mental application, and dexterity, as well as accuracy required; and (d) a list of the
equipment, materials, and supplies used to perform the job Clifton P. Campbell, (1989).
3. Methodology:
3.1 Introduction of the job position
The Customer Care job position is based on the National Classification Code of Canada and a
sample of 9 customer service representatives and 3 Groups’ subject matter area experts were
taken from a multinational Canadian company. These were chosen form three different branches
involved in retail and from contact centers. Customer service representatives in retail
establishments answer in person or on the phone, enquiries from customers and investigate
complaints regarding the establishment's goods, services and policies; arrange for refunds,
exchange and credit for returned merchandise; receive account payments; and receive credit and
employment applications. Contact centre agents take customer orders for goods or services;
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
208
July
2016
promote goods or services; respond to enquiries and emergencies; investigate complaints and
update accounts.
3.2 Employment requirements
Completion of secondary school is usually required.
Completion of some college or other post-secondary programs may be required.
Clerical or sales experience may be required.
Valid driving license
3.3 Job analysis methodology chosen
Functional Job Analysis (FJA) has been chosen as it is more structured, reliable, thorough and a
more rigorous method. Cronshaw, S. F., Best, R., Zugec, L., Warner, M. A., Hysong, S. J., &
Pugh, J. A. (2007) develop and present a five-component model for the validation of FJA task
data based on linguistic, experiential, ecological, hypothetical-criterial, and social-organizational
validation strategies for Veterans Affairs hospitals.
3.4 Standardized job analysis interview questionnaire
Standardized Job Analysis Interview Questionnaire was used to understand important
tasks, knowledge, skills, abilities required, physical abilities, environmental conditions, typical
working incidents, supervisory responsibilities, etc., and to objectively describe the critical
components of the job. This questionnaire was used on the job incumbents of the selected
position.
3.5 Task statement bank sheet
This was used to evaluate worker function orientation and to evaluate the percentage of data,
things and people needed to perform the job. It helped evaluate the general educational
development of the worker to determine reasoning, language and math abilities required for the
job. This was used with the subject matter experts.
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
209
July
2016
3.6 Identification of critical statement
Identification of critical statement is an important pre-requisite for building task statements and
subsequently for creating a task inventory. For identification of critical statements the following
steps were followed:
i. The actions performed by the incumbent who was interviewed was analyzed and used in
making the task inventory.
ii. The person, data or things affected by the actions were evaluated.
o Person: Customer, Branch, Account and Group Managers
o Data: Information Management System (IMS) Database
o Things: Written Reports
iii. The intended outcome or product of action was analyzed
iv. The material, tools and procedures used in performing the action were formulated
3.7 Task statements:
On the basis of identification of critical statements, task statements were created for the task
inventory incorporating the following 4 elements a verb describing the action; an object of the
verb; a description of tools, equipment, aids and processes used on the job; and the expected job
output.
3.8 Task inventory:
Task statements, which indicated at least 75% employees engaged in the task, were included in
the final task inventory. The following task statements were made and distributed to a sample of
job incumbents and other SME’s, who rated these tasks in order of its Frequency, Importance
and Difficulty an a 5 point scale of 1-5
Frequency (Scale: 0-Never; 1-Few times/Year; 2-Once a Month; 3-Once a
week; 4-Once a Day; 5-Several Times a Day)
Importance (Scale: 0-None; 1-Little; 2-Some; 3-Moderate; 4-Very; 5-
Extremely)
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
210
July
2016
Difficulty (Scale: 0-Never perform; 1-Very easy; 2-Easy; 3-Average; 4-Very;
5-Extremely)
i. The person, data or things affected by the actions: These reflect the way in which the
worker interacts with sources of information, other people, and the physical environment
Question asked: ‘What are the subject matter areas covered by each task?’
Answers were analyzed to arrive at the major duty being performed, what the duty
entailed and the subject matter areas that each of that duty belonged to. Thus, the following was
uncovered.
Major duties Each task was done by Subject matter areas
1. Download a customer list Press key F9 to email the list Database Operation
2. Research about customers - Use the internet - Internet Browsing
3. Contact customers - Make Phone calls - English & Verbal
Communication, Cold Calling (CC)
4. Ask standard questions - Customer Interaction - Standard
Questionnaire
5. Record conversation - Typing - Basic Computers
6. Inform the branch - Email and phone calls - Written Com. &
Interpersonal
7. Prepare cover letters - Correlate information; - IMS &
Preparing a draft Creative Writing
8. Prepare packages - Compile Company PR Basic Computer &
Printing /Technology
9. Deliver packages - Driving - Branch Locations
10. Disable the customer - Use IMS tools - Judgment, Decision
Making & Database Management
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
211
July
2016
11. Evaluate monthly sales - Calculate sales figures - Mathematics
12. Record all statistics - Prepare tables, graphs, charts - Advanced
Computers, Analyze Data
& Statistics
Environmental conditions of the job:
Question asked: ‘Describe the frequency and degree to which you will
encounter working conditions such as these: cramped quarters, moving objects, vibration and
inadequate ventilation’
Frequency Degree
Cramped quarters- Once in a month Low
Moving objects- Never 0
Vibration- Never 0
Inadequate ventilation- Never 0
ii. The worker function orientation: This describes the extent of the worker’s involvement
with data, people and things.
Question asked: ‘What facts or principles must you have an acquaintance with or understand in
these subject matter areas?’
Subject matter areas Must have facts or principles
1. Database Operation - Training for operating IMS Database
2. Internet Surfing - Browsing skills and research ability
3. English - Knowledge of the English language
4. Verbal Communication, CC - Speaking in English
5. Standard Questions, Jargon - Company and Product USP’s
6. Basic Computers - Microsoft Word
7. Written Communication - Writing Sentences and Grammar
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
212
July
2016
8. Interpersonal - Emotional Intelligence
9. Creative Writing - Innovative, Intuitive, Creative
10. Printing/ Hardware Technology - Knowledge of Computer Hardware
11. Branch Locations - Branch Addresses
12. Driving - Driving license
13. Judgment - Discretion
14. Decision Making - Subject Matter Command, Authority
15. Database Management - Training in IMS and its tools
16. Advanced Computers - Excel Graphs, Charts; Power Point
17. Mathematics and Statistics - Mathematics, Statistical Tools, Data
Analysis
iii. The worker instruction: This describes the amount of control a worker has over the
specific methods of task performance
Question asked: ‘Describe the level, degree, and breadth of knowledge required in these areas or
subjects?’
Subject matter areas Level, Degree & Breadth
1. Database Operation - Very Good, High, Medium
2. Internet Browsing and research - Good, Medium, Wide
3. English - Good, Proficient, Extensive
4. Verbal Communication, Cold Calling - Good, Fluent, Conversant
5. Standard Questions, Technical Jargon - Very Good, High, Moderate
6. Basic Computers - Advanced, Proficient,
Extensive
7. Written Communication - Good, Grammatically
Correct, Extensive
8. Interpersonal - Basic, Advanced, Fair
9. Creative Writing - Good, Medium, Letter
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
213
July
2016
Writing
10. Printing/ Hardware Technology - Basic, Printing, Narrow
11. Branch Locations - Very Good, High, Extensive
12. Driving - Good, Moderate, Medium
13. Judgment - High, Often, Focused
14. Decision Making - Low, Often, Wide
15. Database Management - High, Often, Wide
16. Advanced Computers - Medium, Often, Narrow
17. Mathematics and Statistics - Basic, Fair, Medium
Question asked: ‘Of the major tasks in your job, how much time does it take to do each one?
How often do you perform each task in a day, week or month?’
Major tasks/duties are: Duration; Periodicity
1. Download a customer list from the database - 1 hr ; 1 day/month
2. Research customer company - 1 hr ; 4 day/month
3. Call up non-trading customers - 3 hrs ; 4 days/week
4. Ask customers questions - 3 hrs ; 4 days/week
5. Drive to Branches - 4 hrs ; 2 times/month
6. Record the conversation on the database - 1 hr ; 4 days/week
7. Inform/update the managers via email - 1 hr ; 4 days/ wk
8. Prepare customized cover letters/packages- 1 hr ; 1 day/week
9. Prepare promotional packages- 2 hrs ; 1day/week
10. Deliver promotional packages - 3 hrs ; 1day/month
11. Disable the customer on the database- 1 hr ; 4 days/week
12. Evaluate sales generated each month - 1 hr ; 1 day/month
13. Record all statistics in the excel sheet- 3 hrs ; 5 days/week
iv. General education: Assessing the abilities required in the areas of reasoning, math,
and language skills
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
214
July
2016
Question asked: ‘What reasoning or problem-solving ability must you have?’
Reasoning Good Judgment ability to decide which customer has potential and who has
to be disabled from the database
Question asked: ‘What mathematical ability must you have?’
Math - Basic additions, multiplications and subtraction and basic statistics mean and
averages
Questions asked: ‘What is the nature and level of language ability, written or
oral, required of you on the job? Are complex oral or written ideas involved in
performing the task, or do you use simple instructional materials?’
Language Understand complex written ideas, following standards and
instructions and complex oral as well as follow simple and detailed instructions and instructional
materials
3.9 Final task statements
These indicated at least 75% employees engage in the task, were included in the final task
inventory
Sample of: Task Inventory in order of its Frequency, Importance and Difficulty on a 5
point scale of 1-5
The following are the 14 Task statements before the 75% rating were done by other
Incumbents and SME’s, as shown below in Table 1:
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
215
July
2016
Table 1
Frequency
Importanc
e
CC Task List
(Scale: 0-
Never; 1-
Few
times/Year
; 2-Once a
Month; 3-
Once a
week; 4-
Once a
Day; 5-
Several
Times a
Day)
(Scale: 0-
None; 1-
Little; 2-
Some; 3-
Moderate;
4-Very; 5-
Extremely)
T
1
Download non-trading customer list from IMS
Database
T
2
Research about company on the internet to gather
customer information
T
3
Contact customers to find out their potential for
sales
T
4
Use standard questionnaire and technical jargon to
convey company USP’s
T
5
Use a product list to inform customers about new
product lines
T
6
Use IMS database to gather, update and record
customer information
T
7
Prepare customized letters for each interested
customer
T
8
Deliver packages for Branch staff to hand deliver
them to customers
T
9
Disable uninterested customers from the database
T
10
Evaluate sales generated each month from the
customer list
T
11
Report monthly to Manager on financial and
performance outcomes
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
216
July
2016
T
12
Record statistics pertaining to the customers as a
result of action taken
T
13
Send emails to Customers and Managers to update
on positive responses
T
14
Use laptop/computer to carry out the work of
regenerating old customers
The following initial KSAO’s derived from analyzing Table 1= 37
Knowledge:
K1. Knowledge of IMS Database Management
K2. Knowledge of Research
K3. Knowledge of English Language
K4. Knowledge of Computers
K5. Knowledge of Cold Calling
K6. Knowledge of Creative Writing
K7. Knowledge of Products
K8. Knowledge of Using Computer Hardware
K9. Knowledge of Branch Locations
K10. Knowledge of Advanced Computer Skills (Excel, Graphs, Charts)
K11. Knowledge of Math / Statistics (Statistical Averages, Means etc)
Skills:
S1. Skill in Operating IMS Database
S2. Skill in Internet Browsing
S3. Skill in Written Communication
S4. Skill in Verbal Communication
S5. Skill in using Microsoft Word, Excel and Outlook
S6. Skill in Writing Letters
S7. Skill in making Promotional Packages
S8. Skill in making Charts and Graphs
S9. Skill in Mathematical Calculations
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
217
July
2016
Abilities:
A1. Ability to Understand and Follow Verbal and Written Instructions
A2. Ability to make Judgment
A3. Ability to work Concurrently
A4. Interpersonal Ability
A5. Ability for Self-Management
A6. Ability to do Simple Mathematical Calculations
A7. Ability to Problem Solve
A8. Ability to Multitask
A9. Ability to work in a cramped Environment and Space
A10. Ability to lift 15 kg weight
A11. Ability to deal with new People and Situations
A12. Ability to Make Decisions
Other Attributes:
O1. Attribute of Emotional Intelligence
O2. Attribute of Mental Endurance
O3. Attribute of Resilience
O4. Attribute of Honesty
O5. Attribute of Empathy
3.10. Final task inventory:
Out of total 14, final 11 Task statements (the highlighted ones) were taken as shown in Table 2,
after 75% rating were completed by Incumbents and SME’s and; after evaluating and
considering those with a Mean of 3 and upwards on a 5- point scale:
Table 2:
Aver.
Freq.
Imp.
Diff.
Final Task Statements'
Mean
Mean
Mean
Mean
Download non-trading customer list
2
1.33
2.67
1.33
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
218
July
2016
from IMS Database
T
1
Research about company on the internet
to gather customer information
3
3.00
2.67
2.67
T
2
Contact customers to find out their
potential for sales
3
1.67
2.67
3.33
Use standard questionnaire and
technical jargon to convey company
USP’s
2
1.67
1.33
1.67
T
3
Use a product list to inform customers
about new product lines
3
3.33
2.67
2.00
T
4
Use IMS database to gather, update and
record customer information
4
3.33
5.00
2.33
T
5
Prepare customized letters /packages for
each interested customer
3
3.33
4.33
2.67
Deliver packages for Branch staff to
hand deliver them to customers
1
0.67
1.33
0.67
T
6
Disable uninterested customers from the
database
3
3.33
4.00
2.00
T
7
Evaluate sales generated each month
from the customer list
3
2.00
4.67
2.67
T
8
Report monthly to Manager on financial
and performance outcomes
3
3.00
4.67
2.33
T
9
Record statistics pertaining to the
customers as a result of action taken
3
3.33
4.67
2.33
T
10
Send emails to Customers and
Managers to update on positive
responses
4
5.00
4.67
2.00
T
11
Use laptop/computer to carry out the
work of regenerating old customers
4
5.00
5.00
3.00
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
219
July
2016
Each KSAO was rated in order of Importance on a 5 point scale of 1-5 and in order of
Proficiency an a 3 point scale of 1-3
Importance (Scale: 0-None; 1-Little; 2-Some; 3-Moderate; 4-Very; 5-Extremely)
Proficiency (Scale: 0-Not needed; 1-Needed upon entry to job; 2-Can be learnt through
training; 3-Needed at end of training).
4 Results:
Initial 37 KSAO’s were derived from the task statements, which were further reduced to 14
KSAO’s. Competency modeling is typically defined as the identification, definition, and
measurement of the KSAOs that are needed to perform successfully on the job (Bartram, 2004;
Schippmann, et al., 2000).
The tables below (Tables 3,4,5 and 6) show the KSOA attributes determined in terms of the
importance and proficiency scales assigned by researcher.
Table 3:
Knowledge:
Importance
Proficiency
K
2
Knowledge of Research
3
2
K
3
Knowledge of English Language
5
1
K
4
Knowledge of Computers
4
1
K
5
Knowledge of Cold Calling
5
2
K
6
Knowledge of Creative Writing
3
2
K
7
Knowledge of Products
2
2
K
8
Knowledge of Using Computer Hardware
2
2
K
9
Knowledge of Branch Locations
4
2
K
10
Knowledge of Advanced Computer Skills (Excel, Graphs, Charts
etc)
5
2
K
11
Knowledge of Math / Statistics (Statistical Averages, Means etc)
5
2
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
220
July
2016
Table 4:
Skills:
Importance
Proficiency
S
1
Skill in Operating IMS Database
5
2
S
2
Skill in Internet Browsing
3
1
S
3
Skill in Written Communication
3
1
S
4
Skill in Verbal Communication
4
1
S
5
Skill in using Microsoft Word, Excel and Outlook
4
1
S
6
Skill in Writing Letters
3
2
S
7
Skill in making Promotional Packages
5
2
S
8
Skill in making Charts and Graphs
4
2
S
9
Skill in Mathematical Calculations
4
2
Table 5:
Abilities:
Importance
Proficiency
A
1
Ability to Understand and Follow Verbal and Written Instructions
5
1
A
2
Ability to make Judgment
5
1
A
3
Ability to Work Concurrently
4
1
A
4
Interpersonal Ability
5
1
A
5
Ability to Self-Manage
5
1
A
6
Ability to do Simple Mathematical Calculations
3
1
A
7
Ability to Problem Solve
4
2
A
8
Ability to Multitask
4
1
A
9
Ability to work in a cramped Environment and Space sometimes
3
1
A
10
Ability to lift 15 kg weight
2
2
A
11
Ability to deal with New People and Situations
5
1
A
12
Ability to Make Decision
5
1
Table 6:
Other Attributes:
Importance
Proficiency
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
221
July
2016
O
1
Emotional Intelligence
5
1
O
2
Mental Endurance
3
1
O
3
Resilience
4
1
O
4
Honesty
4
1
O
5
Empathy
5
1
4.1 Task statements by KSAO matrix
The last step finally integrated the information by compiling a task * KSAO matrix as shown in
Table 7 (Final Task Statements and Knowledge matrix), Table 8 (Final Task Statements and
Skills matrix), Table 9 (Final Task Statements and Abilities matrix) and, Table 10 (Final Task
Statements and Other Attributes matrix) - a useful tool as many tasks require same KSAO’s.
Each cell in the matrix states whether the KSAO applies to a task (Yes = Y) or not (No = N).
Matrixes below show the result of 37 KSAO evaluated after taking only the 75% rated 11 final
task statements.
Table 7:
K
N
O
W
L
E
D
G
E
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
TS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
T
1
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
T
2
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
T
3
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
T
4
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
T
5
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
T
6
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
T
7
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
T
8
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
T
9
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
T
10
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
222
July
2016
T
11
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
5
2
8
8
2
3
5
1
4
3
3
45
18
73
73
18
27
42
8
33
25
25
Wt.
8
9
Table 8:
S
K
I
L
L
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
TS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
T
1
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
T
2
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
T
3
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
T
4
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
T
5
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
T
6
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
T
7
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
T
8
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
T
9
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
T
10
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
T
11
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
5
1
7
6
7
3
1
3
3
42
8
58
50
58
25
8
25
25
Wt.
11
13
12
Table 9:
A
B
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
TS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
T
1
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
T
2
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
T
3
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
223
July
2016
T
4
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
T
5
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
T
6
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
T
7
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
Y
T
8
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
T
9
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
T
10
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
T
11
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
4
11
11
6
11
3
5
11
10
0
6
10
33
92
92
50
92
25
42
92
83
0
50
83
Wt.
1
2
14
3
4
6
15
7
Table 10:
O
T
H
E
R
O
O
O
O
O
TS
1
2
3
4
5
T
1
Y
Y
Y
N
N
T
2
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
T
3
Y
N
N
Y
N
T
4
Y
N
Y
Y
N
T
5
Y
N
N
Y
Y
T
6
Y
N
N
N
N
T
7
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
T
8
Y
N
N
Y
N
T
9
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
T
10
Y
N
N
Y
Y
T
11
Y
N
N
N
N
11
4
4
8
3
92
33
33
67
25
Wt.
5
10
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
224
July
2016
4. Discussion:
Analysis of final KSAO’s: Task Statements are useful in deriving key Knowledge, Skills,
Abilities and Other Attributes (KSAO’s) required to perform the job. Key KSAO’s were derived
from the Task Statements.
Knowledge: Is a body of information, which is procedural in nature and needed for successful
performance of a task.
Skills: These are the level of competency or proficiency expressed in numerical terms for
specific tasks.
Ability: This is a more general capability needed by employees at the beginning of task.
Other attributes: Like personality traits or other personal specific traits that are integral to job
performance.
5.1 Task characterization:
A total of 37 knowledge, skills, abilities and other attributes from the initial 14 total Tasks
Statements were derived (Table 1) out of which important final 15 Knowledge, skills, abilities
and other attributes required to carry out those tasks were derived (Table 11) by evaluating 11
Task Statements using the KSAO Matrixes (Tables 7, 8, 9 and 10), by concentrating on the
KSAO’s that applied to most tasks (derived by taking KSAO’s averaging at 50% and above) in
the matrix (as highlighted in Tables 7,8,9 and 10).
Thus, from the initial list of 37 KSAO’s arrived at prior to the Task Statement and KSAO
matrixes evaluation was completed (Tables 7,8,9 and 10) based on a 50% and above average
applied; these were tapered down to 15 significant KSAO’s based on 75% weightage applied
(Table 11). Finally these 15 KSAO’s were given ranking. The greater the number of task
statements each KSAO occurred within, the higher their ranking. These final, weighted 15
significant KSAO’s form the basis on which several other HR tool may be developed such as a
Job Description, Job Specification, Behavioral Description Interview Questionnaire, Standard
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
225
July
2016
Structured Performance Evaluation tool etc. These have been arrived using the rigorous method
of job analysis demonstrated in the previous section and as explained above.
The final KSAO’s and job performance dimensions are given below in their order of weighting /
ranking. These were further differentiated on the basis of Tasks, Context and
Counterproductive behavioral components.
As Per Ranking /Weighting: Weighting / Rank has been taken from the Task Statement and
KSAO Matrixes (Tables 7,8,9 and 10)
Table 11:
Rank
KSAO’s
% Weights
1
Ability to make Judgment
92 % (Task)
2
Ability to work Concurrently
92% (Context)
3
Ability for Self-Management
92% (Context)
4
Ability to Multitask
92% (Task )
5
Attribute of Emotional Intelligence
92% (Context)
6
Ability to work in a cramped Environment and
Space
83% (Task)
7
Ability to Make Decisions
83% (Task)
8
Knowledge of English Language
73% (Context)
9
Knowledge of Computers
73% (Task)
10
Attribute of Honesty
67% (Counter-
productive (preventing)
11
Skill in Written Communication
58% (Task)
12
Skill in using Microsoft Word, Excel and
Outlook
58% (Task)
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
226
July
2016
13
Skill in Verbal Communication
50% (Task)
14
Interpersonal Ability
50% (Context)
15
Ability to deal with new People and Situations
50% (Context)
5. Conclusion:
The identification of final 15 KSAO opens a lot of scope for further research to be carried out.
A Performance Appraisal Tool is being developed for the same position using Graphical
Rating Scale as a valid and reliable predictor based on critical criteria derived through the above
job analysis to evaluate Task, Contextual and Counter Productive Behaviors.
An Interview tool is being developed for the same position using a Behavioral
Description Interview technique, complete with Probes and Scoring Guides based on the
KSAO’s identified.
A Recruitment Action Plan is being developed on the basis of Internal and External
Analysis, Organization Analysis and Job Analysis. Screening of job applicants’ Minimum
Qualifications based on KSAO’s identified by job analysis and various screening methods is
currently under planning stages.
6. Managerial Relevance:
Job Analysis helps today’s Managers in various ways:
1. In developing a performance management tool aligned to the required (KSAO’s) on the
job. According to Nankarvis, A., Compton, R., &Baird, M (2002), ‘Job Analysis is an important
factor in designing performance appraisal tools’.
2. In developing an aligned behavioral description interview questionnaire that ensure that
only candidates with job required KSAO’s are selected.
3. In developing Job Descriptions and Job Specifications. As per Bodnarchuk (2012) the
interviews show that job descriptions are considered important in the company’.
4. Job Analysis helps in recruitment, by assessing applicants to see whether there is a
person-organization fit and ascertains if a candidate has the required KSAO’s or competence.
5. In screening application forms for the minimum qualification (MQ), which are the
required KSAO’s for successful performance on the job.
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
227
July
2016
6. In testing to finalize job candidates who have the required KSAO’s to successfully
perform at the job.
7. In conducting a standardized structured interview based on the KSAO’s derived from the
Job Analysis.
8. Finally, in decision making where hiring decisions will be based on valid and reliable
measurement of various KSAO’s, which have been tested and derived using job analysis.
Acknowledgements
1. Dr. MJ Ducharme Associate Professor, York University
2. Dr. Sonia Singh Assistant Professor and Visiting Faculty, American University in the
Emirates
3. Dr. Abhilasha Singh Dean, American University in the Emirates
4. Mr. Tony Richardson Group Manager, Torbram Electric Supply, Toronto
5. Sharon Customer Service Manager, Torbram Electric Supply, Toronto
6. Amanda and Customer Care Team, Torbram Electric Supply, London
7. Kristen and Customer Care Team, Torbram Electric Supply, Ottawa
8. Singh and Customer Care Team, Torbram Electric Supply, Toronto
References
1. Bartram, D. (2004). Assessment in organizations. Applied Psychology: An International
Review,
53, 237-259.
2. Bodnarchuk, M. (2012). The role of job descriptions and competencies in an international
3. organization case: Foster Wheeler Energia Oy (Bachelor’s Thesis). Retrieved from
http://publications.theseus.fi/handle/10024/44051
4. Brannick, M. T. & Levine, E. L. (2002). Job analysis: Methods, research, and
applications for
5. human resource management in the new millennium, Sage Publications, London
6. Byars, L.L. & Rue, L.W. (2006). Human Resource Management (8 Ed.). New York: The
McGraw-Hill.
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
228
July
2016
7. Catano,V.M., Wiesner,W.H., Heckett,R.D., Methot,L.L., & Belcourt, M. (2010).
Recruitment
and Selection in Canada. (4th ed.). Toronto, ON: Nelson Education
8. Clifford, J. (1994). Job analysis: Why do it and how should it be done? Public Personnel
Management, 23(2), 321-340.
9. Clifton P. Campbell, (1989) ‘Job Analysis for Industrial Training’, Journal of European
Industrial Training, Vol. 13 Iss: 2
10. Cronshaw, S. F., Best, R., Zugec, L., Warner, M. A., Hysong, S. J., & Pugh, J. A. (2007).
A five
component validation model for functional job analysis as used in job redesign. Ergometrika, 4,
12-31.
11. Friedman, Lee; Harvey, Robert J. (Winter 1986). Personnel Psychology Vol. 39 Issue 4,
p779-
789. 11p.
12. Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. (2012). Unit Group. The National
Occupational Classification: 6552. Retrieved from
http://www5.hrsdc.gc.ca/noc/English/NOC/2011/ProfileNocCode.aspx?val=6&val1=6552&val1
7=1454&val18=1&val19=0
13. Jones, R. G., Sanchez, J. I., Parameswaran, G., Phelps, J., Shoptaugh, C., Williams, M., et
al.
(2001). Selection or training? A two-fold test of the validity of job-analytic ratings of trainability.
Journal of Business and Psychology, 15, 363-389.
14. Levine, E. L., & Sanchez, J. I. (2007). Evaluating work analysis in the 21st Century.
Ergometrika, 4, 1-11
15. Merrit-Haston, R., & Wexley, K. N. (1983). Educational requirements: Legality and
validity.
16. Personnel Psychology, 36, 734-753.
17. Nankarvis, A., Compton, R., &Baird, M (2002). Strategic Human Resource
Management.
Singapore: Thomson Publishing
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
229
July
2016
18. Patrick, J., & Moore, A. K. (1985). Development and reliability of a job analysis
technique.
Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58(2), 149-158.
19. Public Service Commission of Canada, (2011). Setting Cut-off Scores. The Right Choice.
Retrieved from http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/ppc-cpp/acs-cmptnc-evl-cmptnc/ct-off-scrs-pnts-cpr-
eng.htm
20. Sanchez, J. I., & Levine, E. L. (2009). What is (or should be) the difference between
competency
modeling and traditional job analysis? Human Resource Management Review, 19(2), 53-63.
doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.10.002
21. Schultz, D. & Schultz, S.E. (1998). Psychology @ Work Today: An Introduction to
Industrial
and Organizational Psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Schippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., et al.
(2000). The
practice of competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53, 703 740.
23. Visser C. F., Altink W. M. M. & Algera J. A. (1997). From Job Analysis to Work
Profiling: do
24. Traditional Procedures Still Apply? In: International Handbook of Selection and
Assessment
editions N. Anderson & P. Herriot, 441454.
Appendix
1. NOC code
2. Job analysis interview transcript sample
3. Task statements and matrix
4. Team task statements
5. Task statements before 75%
6. Job analysis sequence
7. Job analysis incumbent interview sheet
8. Task inventory
IJMIE Volume 6, Issue 7 ISSN: 2249-0558
________________________________________________________
A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International e-Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories
Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabe ll’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.
International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering
http://www.ijmra.us
230
July
2016
9. Task statements
10. Task rating
11. Task statements after 75%
... To attain an organizational goal, it further includes job duties, job environment, qualification required, and worth of the job. In a study, Kshatriya (2016) declared that Job analysis assists executives with feasible techniques and tools regarding recruitment and selection of potential personnel and when decisions are taken during promotion, performance appraisal, performance management, training & development, and other related decisions in terms of human resource planning practices. Next, he specified that job analysis replies to the queries of what tasks to perform and what means to make up the job applying the performance management systemic method. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The aim of the study is to highlight essential elements of job analysis techniques, discusses innovative approaches, and the strategies adopted by organizations to improvise the Job Analysis procedure. Theoretical framework: Technological advancements and dynamic work environments have changed the means and methods through which job analysis procedure was managed earlier. HR professionals are now exploring innovative approaches and strategies to job analysis which are essentially compatible with the present-day organizational situation. To achieve this objective, human resources operations should be incorporated into the company's strategic management process. Professional experts of human resources should construct a compatible HR management system to support the organization implement its strategic objectives. Design/methodology/approach: The methodology is primarily based upon secondary data. For this, extant literature related to the topic from different databases, websites, and other available sources was gathered. A logical and orderly review of the accumulated literature was completed. Findings: The findings envisage the need for a well-established job analysis framework with all the elements needed to help human resource personnel updated about the changes in the work force concerns around them, make meticulous decisions using job data, and communicate effectively through all the departments in their organization. Practical implications: The study intends to provide managers with a detailed framework of job analysis practices in organization enfolding both the traditional and modern methods and suggesting probable ways to implement them. Originality/value: The paper is basically a descriptive viewpoint that may contribute positively to the extant literature, academicians, professionals and other related streams of the discipline.
... Byars & Rue, (2006) discussed that "the backbone of the most human resource activities is Job analysis which can serve a number of functions. Job Analysis also gives managers a legally defensible tool against pleas of discrimination against protected groups, when hiring and selection decisions including performance appraisal and other HR decisions (Kshatriya, 2016). Job analysis answers the questions of what tasks, performed in what manner, make up a job. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper is aimed at developing a valid performance management tool based on an accurate, detailed, thorough and thoughtful functional job analysis methodology set on North American human resources standards " approved job fact sheet, job analysis questionnaire, task statements " sheet, job duties, job statements and job specifications that were identified. Based on which, key knowledge, skills, abilities and other attributes (KSAO " s) from the task inventory and task statements were subsequently derived. A performance management tool based on an absolute rating system using graphic rating scales was designed along with definition of job performance dimensions for a " requisite " customer care representative position based on the KSAO " s derived. The job analysis carried out not only assures managers that a valid performance management instrument can be developed based on a job analysis, but also demonstrates to HR Managers how systematic human resource decisions can be based on approaches adopted in this research.
Article
Full-text available
Following a Functional Job Analysis methodology in which job duties and job specifications were initially identified, key Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Other Attributes (KSAO's) were extracted from critical statements using task statements and task inventory for a Canadian National Occupational job classification requisite position. The KSAO's were further differentiated on the basis of Tasks, Context and Counter-productive behavioral components. A Performance Appraisal tool was developed based on an Absolute Rating System using Graphical Rating Scalesaligned to the Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Other Attributes derived from job analysis.For testing and screening of candidates, a Behavioral Description Interview tool was developed based on the behavioral structured interview tool developed on the basis of the job analysis. This was a Structured Interviewthat consisted of a standardized set of job-related questions based on KSAO's identified, complete with Probes and a scoring guide. This case study research studies the alignment between Job Analysis conducted and the KSAO's derived used on a PM tool that are aligned with the Behavioral Interview Questionnaire developed for a Customer Care position for a multinational company.
Article
Full-text available
Following a Functional Job Analysis methodology in which job duties and job specifications were initially identified, key Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Other Attributes (KSAO's) were extracted from critical statements using task statements and task inventory for a Canadian National Occupational job classification requisite position. The KSAO's were further differentiated on the basis of Tasks, Context and Counter-productive behavioral components. A Performance Appraisal tool was developed based on an Absolute Rating System using Graphical Rating Scalesaligned to the Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Other Attributes derived from job analysis. Job Performance Dimensions were explained for each of the task, contextual and counter-productive behaviors in terms of what each dimension meant in the context of the job; with a definition given for each job dimension including verbal anchors attached to a numerical scale with appropriate instructions for making a response. The recruitment action plan developed was then based on the Organizational and KSAO's derived from the Job Analysisusing a structured questionnaire.Findings show that an effective direct linkage can be established between Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Other Attributes derived as a result of job analysis and a performance management system and with a Recruitment Action Plan, causing a critical alignment leading to effective selection and recruitment decisions, promotion and performance decision as well as many other important Human Resource related decision based on objective job related criteria. The processes adopted in this research illustrate to Managers how an effective Recruitment system along with valid selection instruments can be developed based on an objective and a legally defensible job analysis demonstrating how systematic selection decisions can be made, including a better aligned performance management tool and a recruitment action planbased on approaches adopted in this research.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this article is to define and explain a trend that has caused a great deal of confusion among HR researchers, practitioners, and consumers of HR-related services: competency modeling. The Job Analysis and Competency Modeling Task Force, a work group jointly sponsored by the Professional Practice Committee and the Scientific Affairs Committee of the Society For Industrial and Organizational Psychology, has recently concluded a 2-year investigation into the antecedents of competency modeling and an examination of the current range of practice. Competency modeling is compared and contrasted to job analysis using a conceptual framework (reflected in a 10-dimension Level of Rigor Scale) that practitioners and researchers may use to guide future work efforts, and which could be used as a basis for developing standards for practice. The strengths and weaknesses of both competency modeling and job analysis are identified and, where appropriate, recommendations are made for leveraging strengths in one camp to shore-up weaknesses in the other.
Article
Full-text available
We argue that Competency Modeling (CM) has the potential to fill an important void in Traditional Job Analysis (TJA), specifically the infusion of strategic concerns in day-to-day employee behavior. Moreover TJA and CM pursue fundamentally different goals, which those who argue for and against either of these human resource methods at times may overlook. To buttress this point we compare TJA and CM along six dimensions: purpose (describe versus influence behavior), view of the job (an object to be described versus a role to be enacted), focus (job versus organization), time orientation (past versus future), performance level (typical versus maximum), and measurement approach (latent trait versus clinical judgment). We conclude with a series of recommendations regarding ways in which TJA can be joined with CM so that an organization may achieve, among other outcomes, the critical purpose of directing employee behavior toward the accomplishment of its strategic objectives.
Article
Full-text available
Decisions to use selection devices or training are typically based on subject matter expert (SME) judgments concerning the trainability of job components, including tasks and knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics (KSAOs). The studies reported here examined the validity of SME trainability judgments from two perspectives. We found that (1) different SME groups' judgments related differently to actual learning changes in KSAOs covered in a training program and (2) sources of variability thought to be unrelated to the job influenced trainability ratings. Implications for the selection of SMEs in job analysis applications intended to determine the trainability of various job components are outlined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Business & Psychology is the property of Springer Science & Business Media B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Book
“This is a very important book. It is an essential text for any graduate program in applied industrial and organizational psychology. The First Edition is the best text on the market today, and the Second Edition is a huge improvement. Nice work!” – Bill Attenweiler, Northern Kentucky University Thoroughly updated and revised, this Second Edition is the only book currently on the market to present the most important and commonly used methods in human resource management in such detail. The authors clearly outline how organizations can create programs to improve hiring and training, make jobs safer, provide a satisfying work environment, and help employees to work smarter. Throughout, they provide practical tips on how to conduct a job analysis, often offering anecdotes from their own experiences. New to the Second Edition: New co-author Frederick P. Morgeson's background in business management brings a valuable new perspective and balance to the presentation of material.; Expanded coverage is offered on O*NET, strategic job analysis, competencies and competency modeling, and inaccuracy in job analysis ratings.; New text boxes provide bio sketches of famous names in job analysis to put a personal face on research.; Additional examples and cases illustrate the “how-to” of job analysis in real-life settings. Companion Website! A companion website, offers instructors and students supplemental materials such as course syllabi, examples of data collected as part of a job analysis, task inventory data, the opportunity to practice data analysis, and much more!
Article
To meet competitive challenges facing organizations today and achieve profitability targets and sustaining the current dynamic component of success for organizations focused on enhancing the strategic role of human resources management. The objective of Strategic human resources management, to create a vision that is so fundamental issues related to the employee regarding. Hence, is given the importance of human resources as the most important factor in the production of Organization. In this paper, the history and the concept of strategic management and human resource management, the concept of strategic human resources management model to explain. It went on to discuss the concept and model of strategic human resources management and discussion describe the relationship between strategic human resources management such as strategic human resources management objectives will be explained.
Article
Job analysis is the common basis for designing a training course or programme, preparing performance tests, writing position (job) descriptions, identifying performance appraisal criteria, and job restructuring. Its other applications in human resource development include career counselling and wage and salary administration. Job analysis answers the questions of what tasks, performed in what manner, make up a job. Outputs of this analytical study include: (a) a list of the job tasks; (b) details of how each task is performed; (c) statements describing the responsibility, job knowledge, mental application, and dexterity, as well as accuracy required; and (d) a list of the equipment, materials, and supplies used to perform the job. Various techniques for conducting a job analysis have been used. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. As a result, different techniques or combinations of techniques are appropriate to different situations. The combined on-site observation and individual interview techniques are recommended for industrial, trade, craft, clerical, and technical jobs because they generate the most thorough and probably the most valid information. A job analysis schedule is used to report the job information obtained through observations and individual interviews. The schedule provides a framework of 12 items in which to arrange and describe important job analysis information. These 12 items are organised into four sections. Section one consists of items one through four. These items identify the job within the establishment in which it occurs. The second section presents item five, the work performed. It provides a thorough and complete description of the tasks of the job. The Work Performed section describes what the job incumbent does, how it is done, and why it is done. Section three presents items six through nine. These are the requirements placed on the job incumbent for successful performance. It is a detailed interpretation of the basic minimum (a) responsibility, (b) job knowledge, (c) mental application, and (d) dexterity and accuracy required of the job incumbent. The fourth section includes three items which provide background information on the job. These items are: (a) equipment, materials and supplies; (b) definitions of terms; and (c) general comments. Appendix A is a glossary of terms associated with job analysis. It is provided to facilitate more exacting communication. A job analysis schedule for a complex and a relatively simple job are included in Appendices B and C. These examples illustrate how important job analysis information is arranged and described. Appendix D provides a list of action verbs which are helpful when describing the manipulative tasks of a job.
Article
The book is written as an introduction to the field of industrial/organizational psychology and is designed as a text for courses in industrial, business, personnel, and applied psychology. Our purpose in this book is not to train people to become industrial psychologists but rather to acquaint students—most of whom will work for some kind of organization—with the principles, practices, problems, and occasional pretenses of industrial/organizational psychology. In addition, we believe that it is important to show students how psychology will aid them in their careers, and how the findings of industrial psychologists will directly influence their lives as job applicants, employees, managers, and consumers. Research methods and findings are discussed within the framework of actual work situations and problems rather than as academic or theoretical exercises. The focus throughout the book is on contemporary, practical, and on-the-job situations. Research findings deal with employees rather than college students. The book is appropriate for use by departments of psychology and schools of business administration at the four-year college and university level as well as junior and community colleges. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Discusses reliability issues associated with the development of a job analysis technique—the Job Structure Profile. Interrater reliability, measured by intraclass correlation, and retest reliability were calculated from the job elements of a sample of 9 clerical, secretarial, and managerial jobs. Eight raters, comprised of 4 job incumbents and 4 supervisors, were used for each job group and were interviewed twice at least 6 wks apart. There was no difference in interrater or retest reliability between supervisors and job incumbents. The effect of different mixes of incumbents and supervisors on interrater reliability was calculated, and satisfactory levels were achieved with 4–5 raters. (29 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Educational achievements (e.g., high school diploma, college degree) are frequently used as selection requirements for a wide variety of jobs. Despite this, the legality and validity of this “selection test” has been a neglected subject of study by personnel psychologists. In this article, two important issues concerning educational requirements are discussed. First, court cases are reviewed to gain insight into judicial opinions. Next, validity studies of educational requirements are summarized. The article concludes with suggestions for the proper use and defense of educational requirements.