ArticlePublisher preview available

Birds of a Feather Fight Together: Status-Enhancing Violence, Social Distance and the Emergence of Homogenous Gangs

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract and Figures

Objectives This study proposes a theoretical framework for understanding two empirical findings from gang research: (1) gangs are generally racially homogenous, even in heterogeneous environments, and (2) gang violence tends to be intra-racial. We draw from the extensive literature on street gangs as well as from research on group formation and status-enhancing behavior to develop a theoretical model of gang formation. Methods Using game theory, we model the simultaneous decisions of individuals to commit status-enhancing acts of violence and to seek protection by joining a gang. We then conduct computer simulations to examine the resulting patterns of violence and gang composition. ResultsWe demonstrate that as long as some social distance exists between racial groups in a community, gang violence will be intra-racial and gangs will be homogenous. We find that our results are robust to a number of simple variations of the model and allow us to generate several hypotheses about the nature of gang formation and patterns of violence. Conclusions When violence is motivated by socially constructed rewards, socially closer targets are likely to yield greater rewards. In such a system, individuals must reduce their likelihood of victimization by entering a social contract of non-violence (i.e. gang membership) with individuals who might view them as status-enhancing targets (i.e. socially close individuals). The result is that gangs are made up of socially close individuals interested in attacking other socially close individuals. Therefore, gangs tend to be racially homogenous and violence is overwhelmingly intra-racial.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL PAPER
Birds of a Feather Fight Together: Status-Enhancing
Violence, Social Distance and the Emergence
of Homogenous Gangs
Jason Gravel
1
Blake Allison
2
Jenny West-Fagan
1
Michael McBride
3
George E. Tita
1
Published online: 10 November 2016
Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016
Abstract
Objectives This study proposes a theoretical framework for understanding two empirical
findings from gang research: (1) gangs are generally racially homogenous, even in
heterogeneous environments, and (2) gang violence tends to be intra-racial. We draw from
the extensive literature on street gangs as well as from research on group formation and
status-enhancing behavior to develop a theoretical model of gang formation.
Methods Using game theory, we model the simultaneous decisions of individuals to
commit status-enhancing acts of violence and to seek protection by joining a gang. We
then conduct computer simulations to examine the resulting patterns of violence and gang
composition.
Results We demonstrate that as long as some social distance exists between racial groups
in a community, gang violence will be intra-racial and gangs will be homogenous. We find
that our results are robust to a number of simple variations of the model and allow us to
generate several hypotheses about the nature of gang formation and patterns of violence.
Conclusions When violence is motivated by socially constructed rewards, socially closer
targets are likely to yield greater rewards. In such a system, individuals must reduce their
likelihood of victimization by entering a social contract of non-violence (i.e. gang mem-
bership) with individuals who might view them as status-enhancing targets (i.e. socially
close individuals). The result is that gangs are made up of socially close individuals
interested in attacking other socially close individuals. Therefore, gangs tend to be racially
homogenous and violence is overwhelmingly intra-racial.
Keywords Gangs Violence Group formation Status Game theory
&George E. Tita
gtita@uci.edu
1
Department of Criminology, Law and Society, University of California, 2340 Social Ecology II,
Irvine, CA 92697-7080, USA
2
Department of Economics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
3
Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
123
J Quant Criminol (2018) 34:189–219
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9331-8
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Internalised 'trauma-related' symptoms, such as repression and avoidance of memories as a way of coping, can present as externalised behaviours, such as aggression and impulsivity, when triggered. There is evidence to support the idea that trauma has a relationship with the future perpetration of particular types of violence (including community and domestic violence), although it is important to note that whether there is a causal link is contested (Pingley, 2017;Gravel et al., 2018). ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
This report looks more closely at how trauma-informed training is being used within Violence Reduction Units (VRUs), as a way to increase understanding of trauma, improve practice, reduce impacts on practitioners and improve outcomes for young people in the criminal justice system. It is based on work by EIF with the Dartington Service Design Lab to understand the current approaches and plans of several VRUs across England and Wales.
... The tension between group stability and instability raises several important questions about gang diversity over time. While the actual mechanisms are certainly complex and worthy of investigation (see Gravel et al. 2018;Brantingham et al. 2012;Brantingham et al. 2019), we also believe it is important to establish some baseline empirical evidence that goes beyond the anecdotal. Here we examine the diversity of gang cliques in an area of Los Angeles over a 35-year period (1978-2012) (see also Barton et al. 2020;Brantingham et al. 2019;Valasik and Phillips 2017). ...
Chapter
Criminal street gangs are paradoxically both ephemeral and durable social forms. Unique gangs might emerge to only disappear a short while later, while other may persist for decades. These dynamics raise questions about the ecological diversity of gangs over time and space. In this chapter we examine gang diversity in an area of Los Angeles over a 35-year period. We look to annual counts of the number of uniquely named gang cliques identified in gang-related homicides. We find that gang diversity fluctuates over time from a minimum of eight to a maximum of 34 unique cliques. Homicide is concentrated among a small number of unique cliques; one uniquely named clique is tied to 86 homicides over this period. Most cliques are around for a very short periods of time; the median lifespan of a clique is 7 years and 41% of all cliques appear for just one year. While the homicides per clique is relatively stable over time, it is clear that more cliques on the landscape is associated with more homicides per clique; there were 63% more homicides with 34 unique cliques on the ground compared with just four. Overall, we estimate that this area of Los Angeles could support as many as 40 unique cliques at any one time. We consider several explanations for the observed patterns and discuss how gang diversity offers a unique window into the challenges communities with chronic gang problems face.
... For street gangs, violence, whether real or perceived, serves an invaluable function in generating group cohesion through the strengthening of ties between members (Bouchard & Spindler, 2010;Klein, 1995b;Vandenbogaerde & Van Hellemont, 2016). The threat of violence from gangs can encourage fearful residents to join a local gang, provide opportunities for established gang members to participate in acts of retaliatory violence that may have otherwise not transpired, and enhances overall group solidarity (Decker, 1996;Gravel et al., 2018Gravel et al., , 2023Lewis & Papachristos, 2020;Papachristos, Hureau, & Braga, 2013). Furthermore, as gang members become socialized into their group, sharing more and more violent experiences, and absorbing the group's mythology, they embrace and adhere to their gang's norms and behaviors that champion violence (Horowitz & Schwartz, 1974;Matsuda et al., 2013;Pyrooz, Moule, & Decker, 2014). ...
Chapter
The current chapter addresses Decker and colleagues (2013) call by building on the work of Valasik and colleagues (2017; Barton et al., 2020) by analyzing the influence of temporal changes in the neighborhood’s social structural characteristics on gang homicide over four decades in the Hollenbeck Community Policing Area within the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). It has been suggested that Hollenbeck provides an apt characterization for the city of Los Angeles. Hollenbeck, like overall Los Angeles, experienced similar trends with substantial shifts in serious crime and violence, with significant reductions between 1992 and 2000, a slight uptick between 2000 and 2002, a steady decline from 2002 to 2018 and then another slight uptick from 2018 to 2021 (see Figure 18.1). In addition to investigating the temporal influence of social structural characteristics on gang-related homicides, this chapter also explores how gentrification and urban renewal impacts gang-related violence over time (see Barton et al, 2020; Smith, 2014). The chapter concludes with a discussion of challenges associated with uprooting gang-related violence’s entrenched relationship with disadvantaged neighborhoods.
... In street gangs, retaliation for actual or perceived slights is often the norm (Decker, 1996). The status-enhancing nature of violence provides incentives for individual involvement in violence (Gravel et al., 2018) and dominance contests between groups (Brantingham et al., 2019;Nakamura et al., 2020;Papachristos, 2009;Randle & Bichler, 2017). Retaliation is often the prototypical example used to demonstrate the self-generating quality of gang violence (Abt, 2019;Brantingham et al., 2020;J. ...
Article
Full-text available
The hypothesis that violence—especially gang violence—behaves like a contagious disease has grown inpopularity in recent years. Scholars have long observed the tendency for violence to cluster in time andspace, but little research has focused on empirically unpacking the mechanisms that make violence conta-gious. In the context of gang violence, retaliation is the prototypical mechanism to explain why violencebegets violence. In this study, we leverage relational event models (REMs)—an underutilized yet partic-ularly well-suited modeling technique to study the dynamics of inter-gang violence. We use REMs toexamine gang violence’s tendency to replicate—for which retaliation is but one plausible mechanism—and its tendency to diffuse to other groups. We rely on data on conflicts between gangs in a region ofLos Angeles over 3 years. We consider how the characteristics of gangs, their spatial proximity, networksof established rivalries, and the evolving history, directionality, and structure of conflicts predict futureinter-gang conflicts. While retaliation is an important mechanism for the replication of violence, estab-lished rivalries, and inertia—a gang’s tendency to continue attacking the same group—are more importantdrivers of future violence. We also find little evidence for an emerging pecking order or status hierarchybetween gangs suggested by other scholars. However, we find that gangs are more likely to attack multiplegangs in quick succession. We propose that gang violence is more likely to diffuse to other groups becauseof the boost of internal group processes an initial attack provides.
... Networks are central to the study of gangs and gang involvement (see Sierra-Arevalo & Papachristos 2015), and network science has enabled researchers to study how individuals within gangs are connected through ties of various strengths and significance. This includes relationships based on common goals, friendship, family, geographic proximity, or shared experiences (Gravel et al. 2018, Grund & Densley 2015, reflecting the social embeddedness in groups. Networks provide a snapshot of the linked lives of gang members, capturing their cooffending, alliances, conflicts, and more (Papachristos et al. 2013, Tita & Radil 2011. ...
Article
Full-text available
For more than three decades, developmental and life-course criminology has been a source of theoretical advancement, methodological innovation, and policy and practice guidance, bringing breadth and depth even to well-established areas of study, such as gangs. This review demonstrates how the developmental and life-course perspective on gangs can be further extended and better integrated within broader developments in criminology. Accordingly, we structure this review within the fourfold paradigm on human development that unites seemingly disparate areas in the study of gangs: (a) historical time and place, or the foregrounding of when and where you are; (b) linked lives, or the importance of dynamic multiplex relationships; (c) timing, or the age-grading of trajectories and transitions; and (d) human agency, or taking choice seriously. We conclude by outlining a vision that charts new directions to be addressed by the next generation of scholarship on gangs.
... Networks are central to the study of gangs and gang involvement (see Sierra-Arevalo & Papachristos 2015), and network science has enabled researchers to study how individuals within gangs are connected through ties of various strengths and significance. This includes relationships based on common goals, friendship, family, geographic proximity, or shared experiences (Gravel et al. 2018, Grund & Densley 2015, reflecting the social embeddedness in groups. Networks provide a snapshot of the linked lives of gang members, capturing their co-offending, alliances, conflicts, and more (Papachristos et al. 2013, Tita & Radil 2011. ...
Article
Full-text available
For more than three decades, developmental and life-course criminology has been a source of theoretical advancement, methodological innovation, and policy and practice guidance, bringing breadth and depth even to well-established areas of study, such as gangs. This review demonstrates how the developmental and life-course perspective on gangs can be further extended and better integrated within broader developments in criminology. Accordingly, we structure this review within the fourfold paradigm on human development that unites seemingly disparate areas in the study of gangs: ( a) historical time and place, or the foregrounding of when and where you are; ( b) linked lives, or the importance of dynamic multiplex relationships; ( c) timing, or the age-grading of trajectories and transitions; and ( d) human agency, or taking choice seriously. We conclude by outlining a vision that charts new directions to be addressed by the next generation of scholarship on gangs. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Criminology, Volume 7 is January 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
... Zhao et al. [30] calculated the cumulative cosine similarity distance between sites based on probability. The study of Gravel et al. [31] shows that there is also convergence effect among individuals in criminal groups, and they tend to recruit people who share the same living space and social environment. ...
Article
Full-text available
As a public infrastructure service, remote sensing data provided by smart cities will go deep into the safety field and realize the comprehensive improvement of urban management and services. However, it is challenging to detect criminal individuals with abnormal features from massive sensing data and identify groups composed of criminal individuals with similar behavioral characteristics. To address this issue, we study two research aspects: pickpocketing individual detection and pickpocketing group identification. First, we propose an IForest-FD pickpocketing individual detection algorithm. The IForest algorithm filters the abnormal individuals of each feature extracted from ticketing and geographic information data. Through the filtered results, the factorization machines (FM) and deep neural network (DNN) (FD) algorithm learns the combination relationship between low-order and high-order features to improve the accuracy of identifying pickpockets composed of factorization machines and deep neural networks. Second, we propose a community relationship strength (CRS)-Louvain pickpocketing group identification algorithm. Based on crowdsensing, we measure the similarity of temporal, spatial, social and identity features among pickpocketing individuals. We then use the weighted combination similarity as an edge weight to construct the pickpocketing association graph. Furthermore, the CRS-Louvain algorithm improves the modularity of the Louvain algorithm to overcome the limitation that small-scale communities cannot be identified. The experimental results indicate that the IForest-FD algorithm has better detection results in Precision, Recall and F1score than similar algorithms. In addition, the normalized mutual information results of the group division effect obtained by the CRS-Louvain pickpocketing group identification algorithm are better than those of other representative methods.
Article
We introduce and study a group formation game in which individuals form groups so as to achieve high collective strength. This strength could be group identity, reputation, or protection, and is equally shared by all group members. The group's strength is derived from its access to resources possessed by its members, and is traded off against the geographic dispersion of the group; spread-out groups are costlier to maintain. We seek to understand the properties of stable groupings in such a setting. We define several types of equilibria, where a member wishing to join a new group requires the acceptance of that group, and may further require permission to leave its current group. We show that under natural assumptions on the group utility functions, some of these equilibria always exist, and that any sequence of improving deviations by agents (or subsets of agents in the same group) converges to an equilibrium. In characterizing the properties of these equilibria, We show that an “encroachment” relationship — which groups have members in the territory of other groups — always gives rise to a directed acyclic graph (DAG). We relate our model to observations of well-established groups in a real-world dataset.
Article
Spurred by the success of public health violence interventions, and accelerated by policy pressure to reduce violence without exacerbating overpolicing and mass incarceration, streetwork programs—those that provide anti‐violence services by neighborhood‐based workers who perform their work beyond the walls of parochial institutions—have positioned themselves as the most important non–law‐enforcement violence prevention option available to urban policy makers. Yet despite their importance, the state of the field seems difficult to interpret for academics and practitioners alike. In this article, we make several contributions that bring forth new findings and deliver new perspectives on streetwork as a violence reduction strategy. First, we offer an extended analytic review of the streetwork evaluation literature that connects the study of contemporary public health violence interventions to a preceding tradition of criminologically inspired streetwork studies. Second, we present the results of an impact evaluation of StreetSafe Boston (SSB)—a multiyear streetwork intervention that served 20 Boston gangs. We find that the SSB intervention had no detectable effect on violence among the gangs that it served. We conclude by offering a framework for understanding a field at multiple crossroads: past and present, proclaimed successes and failures, help and harm.
Book
A systematic and comparative analysis of youth gangs and the youth gang problem in the United States, this book deals with hands-on issues of policy and programs, describing the strategies and techniques for dealing with gangs employed by criminal justice organizations, social agencies, schools, employment programs, and grass-roots organizations. Spergel combines empirical research, first-hand experience, and a solid theoretical base to expose the causes of the gang problem. He recommends strategies that deal with gangs at a community level, using both local and national interests and resources to provide gang members with structured social and economic opportunities.
Book
When the Soviet Union collapsed, the White House announced with great fanfare that 100 FBI counterintelligence agents would be reassigned. Their new target: street gangs. Americans—filled with fear of crack-dealing gangs—cheered the decision, as did many big-city police departments. But this highly publicized move could be an experience in futility, suggests Malcolm Klein: for one thing, most street gangs have little to do with the drug trade. The American Street Gang provides the finest portrait of this subject ever produced—a detailed accounting, through statistics, interviews, and personal experience, of what street gangs are, how they have changed, their involvement in drug sales, and why we have not been able to stop them. Klein has been studying street gangs for more than thirty years, and he brings a sophisticated understanding of the problem to bear in this often surprising book. In contrast to the image of rigid organization and military-style leadership we see in the press, he writes, street gangs are usually loose bodies of associates, with informal and multiple leadership. Street gangs, he makes clear, are quite distinct from drug gangs—though they may share individual members. In a drug-selling operation tight discipline is required—the members are more like employees—whereas street gangs are held together by affiliation and common rivalries, with far less discipline. With statistics and revealing anecdotes, Klein offers a strong critique of the approach of many law enforcement agencies, which have demonized street gangs while ignoring the fact that they are the worst possible bodies for running disciplined criminal operations—let alone colonizing other cities. On the other hand, he shows that street gangs do spur criminal activity, and he demonstrates the shocking rise in gang homicides and the proliferation of gangs across America. Ironically, he writes, the liberal approach to gangs advocated by many (assigning a social worker to a gang, organizing non-violent gang activities) can actually increase group cohesion, which leads to still more criminal activity. And programs to erode that cohesion, Klein tells us from personal experience, can work—but they require intensive, exhausting effort. Street gangs are a real and growing problem in America—but the media and many law enforcement officials continue to dispense misleading ideas about what they are and what they do. In The American Street Gang, Malcolm Klein challenges these assumptions with startling new evidence that must be understood if we are to come to grips with this perceived crisis.
Book
Criminologists often allude to 'peer influence' in explanations of crime and delinquency, but the meaning of that concept rarely receives careful attention. Companions in Crime organizes the extensive literature on peer influence and group delinquency into a coherent form for the first time. Chapters focus on the role of peers over the life course, the group nature of delinquent behavior, and the applicability of peer influence for explaining the major features of delinquent behavior. The most extensive chapter of the book examines possible mechanisms of peer influence and the evidence in favor of each. The principal thesis of Companions in Crime is that deviant behavior is predominantly social behavior, and criminologists must eventually determine the significance of that fact.
Book
This study is based on three years of field work with 99 active gang members and 24 family members. The book describes the attractiveness of gangs, the process of joining, their chaotic and loose organisation, and their members' predominant activities - mostly hanging out, drinking, and using drugs. The authors also discuss gang members' rather slapdash involvement in major property crime and their disorganised participation in drug traffic, as well as the often fatal consequences of their violent life-style. Although the book focuses on the individual, organisational, and institutional aspects of gang membership, it also explores gang members' involvement with other school and neighborhood structures. Extensive interviews with family members provide groundbreaking insights into the gang members' lives. As much as possible, however, the story is told in the gang members' own words.