Content uploaded by Müzeyyen Berkel Kaşıkçı
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Müzeyyen Berkel Kaşıkçı on Nov 07, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
1st International Multidisciplinary Conference on Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods
Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Vol. 4(SI. 2), 146-151 (2016)
Bioavailability of Quercetin
MUZEYYEN BERKEL KASIKCI* and NERIMAN BAGDATLIOGLU
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,
Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.
*Corresponding author Email: muzeyyen.berkel@cbu.edu.tr
http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.4.Special-Issue-October.20
(Received: August, 2016; Accepted: September, 2016)
ABSTRACT
Quercetin is generally present as quercetin glycoside in nature and involves quercetin
aglycone conjugated to sugar moieties such as glucose or rutinose. Quercetin has been reported to
exhibit antioxidative, anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-aggregatory and vasodilating effects.
Unfortunately, quercetin bioavailability is generally poor and several factors affect its bioavailability.
Quercetin bioavailability varies widely between individuals. Gender may affect quercetin bioavailability,
but there is no clear evidence. There has been little research looking for the effects of age and vitamin
C status on bioavailability of quercetin supplements, but there is no research seeking out the effects
of age and vitamin C status on bioavailability of food-derived quercetin. Presence of sugar moieties
increases bioavailability and differences in quercetin-conjugated glycosides affect bioavailability. For
instance, onion-derived quercetin, which is mainly quercetin glucoside, is more bioavailable than
apple-derived quercetin, which contains quercetin rhamnoside and quercetin galactoside. Quercetin is
lipophilic compound, thus dietary fat enhances its bioavailability. Nondigestible fiber may also improve
quercetin bioavailability. Quercetin bioavailability is greater when it is consumed as an integral food
component. This study reviews and discusses factors affecting quercetin bioavailability.
Keywords: quercetin, bioavailability, sugar moiety, solubility, flavonoid, flavonol.
INTRODUCTION
Quercetin is a dietary flavonol found widely
in fruits, vegetables and nuts in many different
glycosidic forms. Major dietary sources are lettuce,
chili pepper, cranberry, onion, black chokeberry,
black elderberry, caper, tomato, broccoli and apple
(Rothwell et al., 2013). In onions, quercetin is bound
to 1 or 2 glucose molecules (quercetin-4´-glucoside
and quercetin-3,4´-glucoside). Examples of dietary
quercetin are quercetin galactosides, which are
found in apples, quercetin arabinosides, which are
present in berries, quercetin-3-rutinoside (rutin),
which are found in capers (Erlund, 2004).
Quercetin has been reported to exhibit
antioxidative, anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory,
anti-microbial, anti-viral, antiaging,anti-thrombotic,
anti-aggregatory and vasodilating effects (Hayek et
al., 1997; Chopra et al., 2000; Verma et al., 1988;
Deschner et al., 1991; Pereira et al., 1996, Ferry et
al., 1996; Erlund et al., 2004). Although quercetin has
lots of health benefits, its bioavailability is relatively
poor and highly variable. This study compiles and
discusses bioavailability studies of food-derived
quercetin and quercetin in supplements.
Bioavailability of quercetin
Bioavailability is the fraction of an orally
administered substance that is absorbed and
available for physiologic activity or storage (Jackson
et al., 1997). Bioavailability is classified as absolute or
relative based on its pharmacokinetics assessment
(Toutain et al., 2004). Absolute bioavailability is
more accurate, and is calculated as the area under
the plasma concentration-time curve of an ingested
substance (AUCoral) relative to its intravenous
administration (AUCi.v) (Levine et al., 1996).
147 KASIKCI & BAGDATLIOGLU et al., Curr. Res. Nutr Food Sci Jour., Vol. 4(SI. 2), 146-151 (2016)
Alternatively, relative bioavailability is simpler, but
less accurate, and is calculated as AUCoral. However,
studies examining relative bioavailability of quercetin
are more common (Guo et al., 2015).
In contrast to the form in most supplements,
most of the quercetin in foods is attached to a
sugar molecule and this conjugate is known as a
glycoside. The onion plant tends to attach glucose
to form quercetin-3-glucoside (isoquercetin) while
apple trees and tea plants tend to attach rutinose,
yielding rutin (Heim et al.,2002; Yoo et al., 2010).
Differences in quercetin-conjugated glycosides
affect its bioavailability (Lee et al., 2012; Hollman
et al., 1997a; Hollmann et al., 1997b). The size and
polarities of these compounds can cause difficulty
crossing membranes in the gut. Oppositely, this is
not the case for isoquercetin. A clinical research
compared quercetin bioavailability from different
foods and supplements (Hollman et al., 1997a;
Hollman et al., 1997b). Absorption from isoquercetin-
rich onions was 52%, compared to 24% from a
standard quercetin supplement (Hollman et al.,
1997b). Likewise, animal studies showed superior
bioavailability of isoquercetin relative to quercetin
and rutin (Manach et al., 1997). Likewise, in another
study, bioavailability of onion-derived quercetin,
which is mainly quercetin glucoside, compared to
apple-derived quercetin, which contains quercetin
rhamnoside and quercetin galactoside (Yoo et al.,
2010; Lee et al., 2012). In this study, AUC0-24h and
Cmax of quercetin following the consumption of onions
were 2 and 3 times greater, respectively, than those
following the consumption of apples (Lee et al.,
2012). Quercetin Tmax did not differ between dietary
sources, but t1/2 of apple-derived quercetin was more
than 4 times shorter after consuming onions (15 h).
These findings support that onion-derived quercetin
is more bioavailable due to its greater absorption
(Lee et al., 2012).
Studies in pigs showed that quercetin
glucoside, compared to quercetin aglycone, had
greater bioavailability. Some hypothesis may clarify
this phenomenon. First of all, quercetin glucoside
(0.76±0.01) is more water soluble than quercetin
aglycone (1.82±0.32) on the basis of its lower
octanol-water partition coefficient (Rothwell et al.,
2005). Another hypothesis is quercetin glucoside
is absorbed through sodium-dependent glucose
transporter 1 (SLGT1), but it is not in use for
quercetin aglycone (Wolffram et al., 2002). SGLT1-
mediated absorption provides greater intestinal
uptake of quercetin glucoside (Guo et al., 2015).
The site and manner in which quercetin absorbed
depends upon its chemical structure (Guo et
al., 2015). In vitro studies put a hypothesis that
the glucose moiety was using a transporter that
normally pumps glucose across membranes of the
intestinal wall (Gee et al., 2000). The rapid absorption
observed with isoquercetin is consistent with this
active transport. For quercetin and rutin, which
cannot use the transporter, peak levels are riched
within 2-4 and 6-8 hours respectively (Olthof et al.,
2000; Erlund et al., 2000). Inversely, isoquercetin
can reach peak concentrations in less than 40
minutes (Olthof et al., 2000). Mechanisms explaining
gastric absorption of quercetin aglycone is unclear,
but studies in Caco-2 cell monolayers support that
intestinal absorption of quercetin aglycone occurs
primarily by passive diffusion and secondarily by
organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)
(Nait et al., 2009). Contrasting quercetin aglycone,
glycosylated forms of quercetin (quercetin glucoside,
quercetin rutinoside) are not absorbed in the
stomach (Crespy et al., 2002). Quercetin glycosides
such as quercetin glucoside, quercetin galactoside,
quercetin arabinoside, are deglycosylated to
quercetin aglycone prior to absorption by lactase
phlorizin hydrolase (LPH), a â-glucosidase residing
at the brush border (Arts et al., 2004; Nemath
et al., 2003). Afterwards, quercetin aglycone is
passively absorbed (Day, A. J., 2003). Different
from those, quercetin rutinoside is absorbed in the
colon following deglycosylation, which appears to be
mediated by gut microbiota-derived â-glucosidase
that generates quercetin aglycone and facilitates its
colonic absorption (Day, A.J., 2003; Jaganath, I. B.,
2006, Kim, D.H., 2008).
The extent to which quercetin is absorbed
in clinical studies can be estimated by multiplying the
plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) of quercetin
by plasma volume (estimated at 3 L for adults) and
dividing by the administered dose (Davy et al.,
1994; Retzlaff, J. A., 1969; Guo et al.,2015). Healthy
participants ingesting grape juice containing 10
mg quercetin aglycone had a quercetin Cmax of 16
µM, which represents approximately 1.4% of the
ingested dose (Golderg et al., 2003). Quercetin
148
KASIKCI & BAGDATLIOGLU et al., Curr. Res. Nutr Food Sci Jour., Vol. 4(SI. 2), 146-151 (2016)
glucoside is also poorly absorbed as evidenced by
an estimated absorption of 6.9 in healthy participants
who ingested onion-derived quercetin glucoside at a
dose corresponding to 100 mg quercetin aglycone
(Graefe et al., 2001).
Bioavailability of quercetin is related to its
bioaccessibility and thereby solubility in the vehicle
used for its administration. Quercetin is relatively
lipophilic with low water solubility. The poor solubility
of quercetin and crstalline form at body temperatures
limitnits bioaccessibility and its bioavailability.
Absolute bioavailability of quercetin was 16% in rats
and its Cmax was 2.01 µM following administration
of quercetin suspended in aqueous solution.
Administration of quercetin aglycone dissolved in
an ethanol and PEG 200 solution increased its
absolute bioavailability to 27.5% and Cmax to 3.44
µM(Khaled et al., 2003; Pool et al., 2013). Octanol-
water partition coefficient of quercetin (1.82±0.32)
is nearly double that of quercetin-3-glucoside
(0.76±0.01), but it is lower than that of kaempferol
(3.11±0.54). Water solubility of quercetin is 1.53-12.5
mg/L at gastrointestinal pH levels (pH 2-7) (Pool et
al., 2013).
Poor bioavailability of quercetin aglycone
and glycosides is also related to their propensity,
and that of their metabolites, to be effluxed back
into the intestinal lumen following enterocyte uptake
(Crespy et al., 1999; Crespy et al., 2001). Quercetin
aglycone or glycosides are effluxed across the apical
membrane of enterocytes, as indicated in Caco-2 cell
monolayer studies showing that their permeability
from the basolateral to apical side was more than
2 times greater than their apical to basolateral
permeability (Nait et al., 2009; Walgren et al., 1998).
Most of the absorbed quercetin aglycone is rapidly
metabolized and secreted back into the intestinal
lumen (Crespy et al., 2001).
Quercetin bioavailability is better when
quercetin is consumed as a cereal bar ingredient
instead of capsule (Egert et al., 2012). Its greater
absorption may be related with manufacturing
process that yields a homogenous solid dispersion
of quercetin with other cereal ingredients. Solid
dispersions have greater surface area that promotes
dissolution in the intestinal lumen, thereby promoting
bioavailability (Guo et al., 2015). Dietary fat improved
quercetin bioavailability in a study with pigs (Lesser
et al., 2004). Quercetin ingestion with short chain
fructooligosaccharide (FOS) improves quercetin
bioavailability (Matsukawa et al., 2009). Quercetin
bioavailability of vacuum impregnated apple chips
(AUC0-1440 min = 104±24 µmol.min.L-1) as functional
food was similar to the supplementation with apple
peel extract capsules (AUC0-1440 min = 87±24 µmol.
min.L-1) in humans (Petersen et al., 2016). More
research are needed to prove that quercetin in food
matrix provides greater bioavailability than capsule
forms.
Quercetin bioavailability is characterized
by high intersubject variability (Kaushik et al.,
2012). For instance, quercetin AUC0-24 h was 8.9-
89.1 µM.h following ingestion of onion-derived
quercetin glucosides at a dose equivalent to 100 mg
quercetin aglycone (Graefe et al., 2001). Quercetin
Cmax was 0.29-2.26 µM in adults who ingested a
beverage containing 500 mg quercetin aglycone
(Kaushik et al., 2002). Intersubject variations
for time to Cmax (Tmax) and elimination half-life
(t1/2) of quercetin in adults were 69% and 122%
respectively, following ingestion of 100 mg apple-
derived quercetin glycosides (Lee et al., 2012).
Likewise, 50 mg quercetin supplementation in adults
results in highly variable plasma concentrations
(38-194 nM) (Egert et al., 2008). Differences in
â-glucosidase activity, a determinant of intestinal
uptake of quercetin glucosides, promote intersubject
variation in quercetin glycoside absorption (Nemeth
et al., 2003; Day et al., 2003; Guo et al., 2015).
Additionally, intersubject variations in intestinal and
hepatic phase II quercetin –metabolizing enzymes
(UGT, specifically UGT1A family; SULT, specifially
SULT1A family; COMT) are speculated to contribute
to interindividual differences in quercetin metabolism
(Egert et al., 2008).
There is no clear evidence demonstrating
that gender and age affect quercetin bioavailability
(Guo et al., 2015). Exceptional finding was that
quercetin from quercetin-3-rutinoside was more
bioavailable in women compared with men (Erlund
et al., 2000). A quercetin study in humans suggest
that individual differences in plasma vitamin C
status may contribute to intersubject variability in
quercetin bioavailability (Guo et al., 2014). Some
in vitro studies also showed that vitamin C protects
149 KASIKCI & BAGDATLIOGLU et al., Curr. Res. Nutr Food Sci Jour., Vol. 4(SI. 2), 146-151 (2016)
quercetin against oxidative degredation (Skaper
et al., 1997; Takahama et al., 2003). More clinical
studies are necessary to define if vitamin C status
regulates quercetin bioavailability.
In conclusion, quercetin has several
health effects and thereby, its bioavailability is
really significant and unfortunately, is poor. Many
factors such as glucose moieties, solubility, human
factor, vitamin C status and food matrix can affect
bioavailability. More research is warranted to
evaluate and improve bioavailability of quercetin.
REFERENCES
1. Arts, I. C., Sesink, A. L., Faassen-Peters,
M., Hollman, P.C. The type of sugar moiety
is a major determinant of the small intestinal
uptake and subsequent biliary excretion of
dietary quercetin glycosides. Br. J. Nutr., 91:
841-847 (2009).
2. Chopra, M., Fitzsimons, P. E., Strain J. J.,
Thurnham, D.I., Howard A.N. Nonalcoholic
red wine extract and quercetin inhibit LDL
oxidation without affecting plasma antioxidant
vitamin and carotenoid concentrations. Clin.
Chem. 46: 1162- 70 (2000).
3. Crespy,V., Morand, C., Besson, C., Manach,
C., Demigne, C., Remesy, C. Comparision
of the intestinal absorption of the quercetin,
phloretin and their glucosides in rats. J. Nutr.,
14: 2109-2114 (2001).
4. Crespy, V., Morand, C., Besson, C., Manach,
C., Demigne, C., Remesy, C. Quercetin, but
not its glycosides, is absorbed from the rat
stomach. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: 618- 621
(2002).
5. Crespy, V., Morand, C., Manach, C., Besson,
C., Demigne, C., Remesy, C. Part of quercetin
absorbed in the small intestine is conjugated
and further secreted in the intestinal lumen.
Am. J. Physiol., 277: 120-126 (1999).
6. Davy, K. P., Seals, D. R. Total blood volume
in healthy young and older men. J. Appl.
Physiol., 76: 2059-2062 (1994).
7. Day, A. J., Gee, J. M., DuPont, M. S., Johnson,
I. T., Williamson, G. Absorption of quercetin-
3-glucoside and quercetin-4´-glucoside in the
rat small intestine: the role of lactase phlorizin
hydrolase and the sodium-dependent glucose
transporter. Biochem. Pharmacol., 65: 1199-
11206 (2003).
8. Deschner, E.E., Ruperto, J., Wong, G.,
Newmark, H.L. Quercetin and rutin as
inhibitors of azoxymethanolinduced colonic
neoplasia. Carcinogenesis, 12:1193-1196
(1991).
9. Egert, S., Wolffram, S., Bosy-Westphal, A.,
Boesch-Saadatmandi, C., Wagner, A. E.,
Frank, J. Daily quercetin supplementation
dpse-dependently increases plasma quercetin
concentrations in healthy humans. J. Nutr.,
138: 1615-1621 (2008).
10. Egert, S., Wolffram, S., Schulze, B., Langguth,
P., Hubbermann, E. M., Schwarz, K. Enriched
cereal bars are more effective in increasing
plasma quercetin compared with quercetin
quercetin from powder-filled hard capsules.
Br. J. Nutr., 107: 539-546 (2012).
11. Erlund, I., Kosonen, T., Alfthan, G.,
Pharmacokinetics of quercetin from quercetin
aglycone and rutin in healthy volunteers. Eur.
J. Clin. Pharmacol., 56: 545-553 (2000).
12. Erlund, I. Review of the flavonoids quercetin,
hesperetin, and naringenin. Dietary sources,
bioactivities, bioavailability and epidemiology.
Nutr. Res., 24: 851-874 (2004).
13. Ferry, D.R., Smith, A., Malkhandi, J., Fyfe,
D.W., de Takats, P.G., Anderson, D. Phase
I clinical trial of the flavonoid quercetin:
pharmacokinetics and evidence for in vivo
tyrosine kinase inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res.,
2: 659- 68 (1996).
14. Gee, J. M., DuPont, M. S., Day, A. J. Intestinal
transport of quercetin glycosides in rats
involves both deglycosylation and interaction
with the hexose transport pathway. J. Nutr.,
130: 1200-1203 (2000).
15. Graefe, E. U., Witting, J., Mueller, S.,
Riethling, A. K., Uehleke, B., Drewelow,
B. Pharmocokinetics and bioavailability of
quercetin glycosides in humans. J. Clin.
Pharmacol., 41: 492-499 (2001).
150
KASIKCI & BAGDATLIOGLU et al., Curr. Res. Nutr Food Sci Jour., Vol. 4(SI. 2), 146-151 (2016)
16. Goldberg, D. M., Yan, J., Soleas, G. J.
Absorption of three wine-related polyphenols
in three different matrices by healthy subjects.
Clin. Biochem., 36: 79-87 (2003).
17. Guo, Y., Bruno, R. S. Endogenous and
exogenous mediators of quercetin
bioavailability. J. Nutr. Biochem., 26: 201-210
(2015).
18. Guo, Y., Mah., E., Bruno, R. S. Quercetin
bioavailability is associated with inadequate
plasma vitamin C status and greater plasma
endotoxin in healthy adults. Nutrition, 30:
1279-1286 (2014).
19. Hayek, T., Fuhrman, B., Vaya, J., Rosenblat, M.,
Belinky, P., Coleman, R. Reduced progression
of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient
mice following consumption of red wine,
or its polyphenols quercetin or catechin, is
associated with reduced susceptibility of LDL
to oxidation and aggregation. Arterioscler
Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17: 2744-2752 (1997).
20. Heim, K., Tagliaferro, A. R., Bobilya, D.
J. Flavonoid antioxidants: chemistry and
structure-activity relationship. J Nutr Biochem.,
13(10): 572-584 (2002).
21. Hollman, P. C., van Trijp, J. M., Buysman, M.
N. Relative bioavailability of the antioxidant
flavonoid quercetin from various foods in man.
FEBS Lett., 418: 152-156 (1997).
22. Hollman, P. C., van Trijp, J. M., Mengelers,
M. J. Bioavailability of the dietary antioxidant
flavonol quercetin in man. Cancer Lett., 114:
139-140 (1997).
23. Jackson, M. J., The assessment of
bioavailability of micronutrients: introduction.
Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 51: 1-2 (1997).
24. Jaganath, I.B., Mullen, W., Edwards, C. A.,
Crozier, A. The relative contribution of the
small and large intestine to the absorption
and metabolism of rutin in man. Free Radic.
Res., 40: 1035-1046 (2006).
25. Kaushik, D., O’Fallon, K., Clarkson, P. M.,
Dunne, C. P., Conca, K. R., Michniak-Kohn, B.
Comparision of quercetin pharmacokinetics
following oral supplementation in humans. J.
Food Sci., 77: 231-238 (2012).
26. Khaled, K. A., El-Sayed, Y. M., Al-Hadiya, B.
M. Disposition of the flavonoid quercetin in
rats after single intravenous and oral doses.
Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 29: 397-403 (2003).
27. Kim, D.H., Jung, E. A., Sohng, I. S., Han,
J.A., Kim, T. H., Han, M. J. Intestinal bacterial
metabolism of flavonoids and its relation to
some biological activities. Arch. Pharm. Res.,
21: 17-23 (1998).
28. Lee, J., Mitchell, A. E. Pharmacokinetics of
quercetin absorption from apples and onions
in healthy humans. J. Agric. Food Chem., 60:
3874-3881 (2012).
29. Lesser, S., Cermak, R., Wolffram, S.
Bioavailability of quercetin in pigs is influenced
by the dietary fat content. J. Nutr., 134: 1508-
1511 (2004).
30. Levine, M., Conry-Cantilena, C., Wang, Y.,
Welch, R. V., Washko, P. W., Dhariwal, K.
R. Vitamin C pharmacokinetics in healthy
volunteers: evidence for a recommended
dietary allowance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 93:
3704-3709 (1996).
31. Manach, C., Morand, C., Demigne, C.
Bioavailability of rutin and quercetin in rats.
FEBS Lett., 409: 12-16 (1997).
32. Matsukawa, N., Matsumoto, M., Shinoki, A.,
Hagio, M., Inoue, R., Hara, H. Nondigestible
saccharides supress the bacterial degradation
of quercetin aglycone in the large intestine
and enhance the bioavailability of quercetin
glucoside in rats. J. Agric. Food. Chem., 57:
9462-9468 (2009).
33. Nait, C. M., Al., A. A., Peluso, J., Muller, C.
D., Ubeaud, G. Quercetin and naringenin
transport across human intestinal Caco-2
cells. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 61: 1473-1483
(2009).
34. Nemeth, K., Plumb, G. W., Berrin, J. G., Juge,
N., Jacob, R., Naim, H. Y. Deglycosylation
by small intestinal epithelial cell beta-
glucosidases is a critical step in the absorption
and metabolism of dietary flavonoid glycosides
in humans. Eur. J. Nutr., 42: 29-42 (2003).
35. Olthof, M. R., Hollman, P.C., Vree, T. B., Katan,
M. B. Bioavailabilities of quercetin-3-glucoside
and quercetin-4´-glucoside do not differ in
humans. J. Nutr., 130: 1200-1203 (2000).
36. Pereira, M. A., Grubbs, C.J., Barnes, L.H.,
Li, H., Olson, G.R., Eto, I. Effects of the
phytochemicals, curcumin and quercetin,
upon azoxymethane-induced colon cancer
and 7,12 dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced
mammary cancer in rats. Carcinogenesis,
151 KASIKCI & BAGDATLIOGLU et al., Curr. Res. Nutr Food Sci Jour., Vol. 4(SI. 2), 146-151 (2016)
17:1305-1311 (1996).
37. Petersen, B., Egert, S., Bosy-Westphal, A.,
Müller, M. J., Wolffram, S., Hubbermann, E.
M., Rimbach, G., Schwarz, K. Bioavailability
of quercetin in humans and the influence of
food matrix comparing quercetin capsules
and different apple sources. Food Res. Int.,
88: 159-165 (2016).
38. Pool, H., Mendoza, S., Xiao, H., McClements
D. J. Encapsulation and release of hydrophobic
bioactive components in nanoemulsion-based
delivery systems: impact of physical form on
quercetin bioaccessibility. Food Func., 4: 162-
174.
39. Retzlaff, J. A., Tauxe, W. N., Kiely, J. M.,
Stroebel, C. F. Erythrocyte volume, plasma
volume and, lean body mass in adult men
and women. Blood, 33:649-661 (1969).
40. Rothwell, J. A. Perez-Jimenez, J., Neveu, V.,
Medina-Remon, A., M´Hiri, N., Garcia-Lobato,
P. Phenol explorer 3.0: a major update of the
Phenol-Explorer database to incorporate
data on the effects of food processing on
polyphenol content. Database (Oxford)
2013. http://phenol-explorer.eu/contents/
polyphenol/291
41. Skaper, S. D., Fabris, M., Ferrari, V., Dalle
Carbonare, M., Leon, A. Quercetin protects
cutaneous tissue-associated cell types
including sensory neurons from oxidative
stress induced by glutathione depletion:
cooperative effects of ascorbic acid. Free
Radic. Biol. Med., 22: 669-678 (1997).
42. Takahama, U., Yamamoto, A., Hirota, S.,
Oniki, T. Quercetin-dependent reduction of
salivary nitrite to nitric oxide under acidic
conditions and interactions between quercetin
and ascorbic acid during the reduction. J.
Agric. Food Chem., 51: 6014-6020 (2003).
43. Verma, A. K., Johnson, J.A., Gould, M. N.,
Tanner, M.A. Inhibition of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)
anthracene and N-nitrosomethylurea induced
mammary cancer by dietary flavonol quercetin.
Cancer Res., 48:5754- 88 (1998).
44. Walgren, R. A., Walle, U. K., Walle, T. Transport
of quercetin and its glucosides across human
intastinal epithelial Caco-2 cells. Biochem.
Pharmacol., 55: 1721-1727.
45. Wolffram, S., Block, M., Ader, P. Quercetin-
3-glucoside is transported by the glucose
carrier SLGT1 across the brush border
membrane of rat small intestine. J. Nutr., 132:
630-635 (2002).
46. Yoo, K.S., Lee, E. J., Patil, B. S. Quantification
of quercetin glycosides in 6 onion cultivars
and comparisions of hydrolysis-HPLC and
spectrophotometric methods in measuring
total quercetin concentrations. J. Food Sci.,
75: 160-165 (2010).