ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Most change of direction (COD) tests use total time to evaluate COD performance. This makes it difficult to identify COD ability, since the majority of time is a function of linear running. The COD deficit has been proposed as a practical measure to isolate COD ability independent of sprint speed. This study evaluated relationships between sprint time, 505 time and COD deficit, and whether the COD deficit identified a different and more isolated measure of COD ability compared to 505 time. Seventeen cricketers performed the 505 for both left and right sides, and 30 m sprint tests (with 10 m split time). The COD deficit for both sides was calculated as the difference between average 505 and 10 m time. Correlations were calculated between all variables (p < 0.05). To compare 505 time and COD deficit, z-scores were calculated; the difference in these scores were evaluated for each subject. The COD deficit correlated to 505 (r = 0.74-0.81) but not sprint time (r = -0.11-0.10). In contrast, 505 time did correlate with sprint time (r = 0.52-0.70). Five of seventeen subjects were classified differently for COD ability when comparing standardized scores for 505 time versus COD deficit. The majority of subjects (88-94%) had a meaningful difference between 505 time and COD deficit. Using 505 time to determine COD ability may result in a large amount of replication to linear speed assessments. The COD deficit may be a practical tool to better isolate and identify an athlete's ability to change direction.
Content may be subject to copyright.
CHANGE OF DIRECTION DEFICIT:AMORE ISOLATED
MEASURE OF CHANGE OF DIRECTION PERFORMANCE
THAN TOTAL 505 TIME
SOPHIA NIMPHIUS,
1,4
SAMUEL J. CALLAGHAN,
1
TANIA SPITERI,
2
AND ROBERT G. LOCKIE
3
1
Centre for Exercise and Sport Science, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia;
2
School of Health Sciences, The Notre Dame University Australia, Fremantle, Australia;
3
Department of Kinesiology, California
State University, Northridge, California; and
4
Hurley Surfing Australia High Performance Centre, Casuarina, Australia
ABSTRACT
Nimphius, S, Callaghan, SJ, Spiteri, T, and Lockie, RG. Change
of direction deficit: A more isolated measure of change of
direction performance than total 505 time. J Strength Cond
Res 30 (11): 3024–3032, 2016—Most change of direction
(COD) tests use total time to evaluate COD performance. This
makes it difficult to identify COD ability because the majority of
time is a function of linear running. The COD deficit has been
proposed as a practical measure to isolate COD ability inde-
pendent of sprint speed. This study evaluated relationships
between sprint time, 505 time, and COD deficit, and whether
the COD deficit identified a different and more isolated mea-
sure of COD ability compared with 505 time. Seventeen crick-
eters performed the 505 for both left and right sides and 30-m
sprint tests (with 10-m split time). The COD deficit for both
sides was calculated as the difference between average 505
and 10-m time. Correlations were calculated between all vari-
ables (p#0.05). To compare 505 time and COD deficit,
z-scores were calculated; the difference in these scores was
evaluated for each subject. The COD deficit correlated to 505
(r= 0.74–0.81) but not sprint time (r=20.11 to 0.10). In
contrast, 505 time did correlate with sprint time (r= 0.52–
0.70). Five of 17 subjects were classified differently for COD
ability when comparing standardized scores for 505 time vs.
COD deficit. Most subjects (88–94%) had a meaningful differ-
ence between 505 time and COD deficit. Using 505 time to
determine COD ability may result in a large amount of replica-
tion to linear speed assessments. The COD deficit may be
a practical tool to better isolate and identify an athlete’s ability
to change direction.
KEY WORDS agility, linear speed, athletic testing, cricket,
cutting
INTRODUCTION
Change of direction (COD) speed forms the phys-
ical foundation for agility, as it incorporates the
mechanics associated with agility performance
(i.e., the deceleration, directional change, and
acceleration) (36) while allowing for progression from lower
joint loading received in the preplanned movements before
training the higher joint loadings that must be handled dur-
ing agility (2). Because of the importance of using COD
movements to build the physical platform before performing
agility, many field and court sport athletes, strength and
conditioning coaches seek to use appropriate tests to accu-
rately isolate and measure the physical quality of changing
direction. A variety of assessments have been adopted by
coaches to assess COD ability (3,35,36). Some examples
include the proagility shuttle (27,31,37,42,43), 3-cone drill
or L-run (11,31,37), T-test (16,30,33), and Illinois agility test
(IAT) (16,22,43,44). It would be assumed that these COD
tests intend to provide a valid assessment, specifically, the
assessment of one’s ability to both decelerate and reacceler-
ate for a given directional change. The inclusion of any addi-
tional components to those mentioned above begin to assess
other physical qualities (e.g., acceleration and maximal
velocity), removing the emphasis from COD ability.
Therefore, the aforementioned tests are not without their
limitations. First, the inherent movement patterns during
certain assessments contain actions that are not necessarily
specific to the COD patterns within particular sports. For
example, the proagility test has been adopted for football
(27,31,37) and soccer (42,43), yet the movements within the
assessment (3 side-to-side runs within a 10-yard distance) do
not match the CODs typically performed in each sport. This
is also true for the 3-cone drill (5 CODs while running in the
shape of an “L”), which is also popular for American football
(31,37), and has been used in rugby league (11). In addition to
this, if a COD test is too long in duration, then, there is less
emphasis on COD ability and more on anaerobic capacity
and linear sprinting ability (43). For example, the 3-cone drill
can have a duration of approximately 7–8 seconds when com-
pleted by collegiate football players (37). The T-test can last
Address correspondence to Sophia Nimphius, s.nimphius@ecu.edu.au.
30(11)/3024–3032
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Ó2016 National Strength and Conditioning Association
3024
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
up to 10–12 seconds (21,30,33), whereas the IAT is typically
completed in 14–18 seconds (16,22,43,44) by athletic popula-
tions. Potentially, this could result in metabolic limitations
influencing the performance of these tests (43), without the
provision of appropriate information about COD ability.
A test that restricts many of these limitations is the 505,
which is another popular assessment of COD ability (40). The
505 traditionally involves a 10-m sprint past a timing gate,
a further 5-m sprint to a turning line where 1 leg needs to
reach and plant at this line, before the athlete completes a 1808
turn and sprints back through the timing gate (Figure 1). The
action of the 1808COD is physically demanding, and can
isolate horizontal plane COD ability (6), and has been identi-
fied as a reliable test (11,34,40). The 505 can also be used to
investigate as the COD ability for each leg (17,18,28,29), which
is an important consideration for athletes, as most athletes
strive toward achieving a balance between the legs in
power-based activities (17). Consequently, this test has been
administered for a range of athletes from sports, such as rugby
league (11), soccer (24), netball (9), basketball (41), softball
(28,29), and cricket (18). The use of the 505 with cricketers
is notable. The action of running between the wickets in this
sport involves a 1808turn (7,15,18,23). As evidence of the
importance of this COD, when batsmen score 100 runs during
a match, they will be required to complete approximately
forty 1808turns during their innings (7). For this population,
the 505 is very specific to actions they would produce during
a match (18,38).
The duration of the 505 is relatively short (approximately
2–3 seconds) (17,18,28,29,34), which means that it should
place a greater emphasis on COD ability. However, using
the time as a measure from a test such as the 505 may not
necessarily represent the COD ability of an athlete (34).
Nimphius et al. (27) originally stated that because of the
design of the 505 test, approximately 31% of the time is spent
actually changing direction. Therefore, a majority of the total
time to complete the test can be explained by an athlete’s
acceleration ability (27). Simply stated, an athlete who is fast
linearly may still perform well in a COD test, as their sprint-
ing ability could mask any deficiencies in COD ability. This
concept is supported by research that has found large
correlations between linear and COD speed tests
(11,22,30,34,43), although it is widely acknowledged that
they are different skills (32,43,45). Rather than measuring
time in the traditional manner within the 505, (34) suggested
that COD speed should be measured over shorter distances,
such as within the first meter after the COD. However, there
are practical issues with using this approach. If a coach is
using timing gates in the field over such short distance (i.e.,
1 m or less), the light beam may be broken purely because of
the athlete’s forward lean within the COD. In addition to
this, the reliability of times measured in a COD speed de-
creases when the distances are reduced (34), which influen-
ces how the data can be interpreted by a coach. Therefore, it
would be useful for strength and conditioning coaches to be
able to use the time measured during the traditional 505, but
be able to interpret them in such a way that better isolates
COD ability.
One such solution is the COD deficit that is a procedure
proposed by Nimphius et al. (27). The COD deficit docu-
ments the effect or additional time that one directional
change requires when compared with a pure linear sprint
over an equivalent distance. This measure was initially inves-
tigated in Division IA collegiate football players, whereby
COD deficit was calculated as the difference between the
10-yard split time during a 40-yard sprint, and the 10-yard
split with a 1808cut that was measured within the first half of
the proagility shuttle (27). Nimphius et al. (27) proposed that
the average COD deficit time (0.72 60.08 seconds) calcu-
lated from the first half of the proagility shuttle (2.29 60.17
seconds) was the duration required to add a single COD
within a 10-yard distance. In addition to this, although the
Figure 1. Structure and dimensions of the 505 change of direction test.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca.com
VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 11 | NOVEMBER 2016 | 3025
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
COD deficit correlated with the modified proagility test
times (first 10-yard split and total time), the explained vari-
ance was low (29–37%). Conversely, when these variables
were assessed through a partial correlation with sprint time
over 10 yards as the controlled variable, the explained vari-
ance was much higher (89%). These data suggest that COD
deficit potentially provides a measure of COD ability inde-
pendent of linear speed. Given the nature of the 505, the
COD deficit could be directly applied to this test. However,
the value of doing so, and whether this provides a different
magnitude of COD ability rather than just 505 time alone,
must be confirmed.
Therefore, this study investigated the COD deficit in an
athletic population. Experienced cricketers were selected
because of the importance of 1808direction changes in
their sport and thus a necessity for them to be proficient
in this action (7,15,18,23). There were 2 purposes for this
research. The first purpose was to evaluate the relation-
ship between measures of linear speed (10- and 30-m
sprint times), COD time measured by the 505, and COD
deficit. Second, this study sought to determine whether
the COD deficit identified a different magnitude of COD
ability of individuals in comparison with the traditional
total time for completion of the 505 COD test. It was
hypothesized that the correlations and explained variance
would illustrate that the COD deficit provided a different
measure of COD ability. Furthermore, analysis of stan-
dardized scores would document that the COD deficit
identified a different magnitude of COD ability when
compared with total 505 test time for both the preferred
and nonpreferred sides.
METHODS
Experimental Approach to the Problem
The study investigated the COD deficit as measured by the
505 in experienced cricketers. A cross-sectional analysis was
conducted, and Pearson’s correlations were used to determine
the relationship between the 505 times and COD deficits for
each side and 10- and 30-m sprint times. Standardized
(z-score) 505 times and COD deficits for each side were used
to determine whether scores for each subject were meaning-
fully different from the group mean.
Subjects
Seventeen experienced male cricketers (age = 24.4 65.0
years; height = 1.84 60.1 m; mass = 86.9 613.9 kg), who
currently played first grade cricket in a regional competi-
tion in Australia, were recruited for this study. This subject
number is similar to previous research that analyzed linear
and COD speed in cricketers (5,15,18,23), and the sample
size of 16 estimated using G*Power (alpha = 0.05; beta =
0.80) (10) to find similar explained variance in previous
research between a COD test and COD deficit (27). Sub-
jects were recruited if they: were currently playing first
grade cricket in the regional competition; had at least 5
years of experience playing cricket; had a general cricket
training history ($2times$wk
21
) extending over the pre-
vious 12 months; were currently training for cricket ($3
h$wk
21
); and did not have any existing medical conditions
that would compromise participation in the study. The
methodology and procedures used in this study were
approved by the institutional ethics committee. All sub-
jects received a clear explanation of the study, including
the risks and benefits of participation, and written
informed consent and assent (if required) was provided
before testing.
Procedures
One testing session was used in this study, whereby
subjects completed 30-m sprints and 505 trials, turning off
both the left and right foot. All subjects were familiar with
the tests used in this study. Testing was conducted in the
biomechanics laboratory, with a textured concrete surface,
at the university. Testing was conducted during the middle
of the cricket season, and sessions were scheduled in the
afternoon or early evening. Subjects did not eat for 2–3
hours before the testing session, and refrained from inten-
sive exercise, and abstained from caffeine or any form of
stimulant in the 24-hour period before testing. Subjects
were permitted to consume water ad libitum throughout
the session. Before data collection, the subject’s age, height,
and body mass were recorded. Height was measured using
a stadiometer (Seca 213; Ecomed Trading, Seven Hills,
Australia) and recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass
was recorded using electronic digital scales (BF-522; Tanita
Corporation, Japan) to the nearest 0.1 kg. A standardized
warm-up was conducted before the testing session consist-
ing of 5 minutes of jogging on a treadmill at a self-selected
running velocity, followed by 10 minutes of dynamic
stretching of the lower limbs, and progressive speed runs
over the testing distances.
30-m Sprint
The 30-m sprint has been previously used to assess linear
speed in cricketers (18). Time was recorded using a timing
lights system (Smartspeed; Fusion Sports, Sumner, Austral-
ia). Gates were placed at 0, 10, and 30 m, at a height of
1.2 m and width of 1.5 m, to measure the 0–10 m and 0–
30 m intervals. These intervals provided a measure of accel-
eration (20) and maximum velocity (8) for the correlation
analysis. Subjects began each sprint 30 cm behind the start
line, to trigger the first gate (18). A standing start was used,
and subjects were free to choose their front leg in this
stance, which was the same for all trials. Subjects were
instructed to drive off from the starting line and sprint
through all sets of timing gates. Three trials were com-
pleted, with 3 minutes of recovery between efforts. If the
subject rocked backward or forward before starting, the
trial was disregarded and repeated after the requisite recov-
ery period. Time for each distance was recorded to the
nearest 0.001 seconds, and the averages were used for
Change of Direction Deficit in Cricket Players
3026
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
analysis. The mean 0- to 10-m split time was used to cal-
culate the COD deficit, the process of which will be
detailed later.
505 Change of Direction Test
The methodology for the 505 was used as per established
methods (6) with the setup is shown in Figure 1. Subjects
used a standing start with the same body position as per the
30-m sprint, with their front foot 30 cm behind the start line.
The subjects sprinted through the timing gate to the turning
line, indicated by a line marked on the laboratory floor and
markers. Subjects were to place either the left or right foot,
depending on the trial, on or behind the turning line, before
sprinting back through the gate. Three trials were recorded
for turns off the left and right side, the order of which was
randomized among the subjects, with 3 minutes recovery
provided between trials. A researcher was positioned at
the turning line, and if the subject changed direction before
hitting the turning point, or turned off the incorrect foot, the
trial was disregarded and reattempted after the recovery
period. Time for each distance
was recorded to the nearest
0.001 seconds. The mean for
the 3 trials for the 505 for each
leg was used for analysis. The
side with the fastest time was
defined as the preferred side,
whereas the other was the non-
preferred side (19). The COD
deficit for the 505 for each leg
was calculated by the formula:
mean 505 time 2mean 10-m
time (27). As stated, the mean
10-m time was taken from the
30-m sprint.
Statistical Analyses
Mean and SDs, in addition to
95% confidence intervals, were calculated for each variable.
Trial-to-trial reliability of sprint and COD times were as-
sessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) cal-
culated from a 2-way mixed method consistency model for
average measures. An ICC equal to or above 0.70 was con-
sidered acceptable (1,14,18). The Levene’s statistic was used
to determine homogeneity of variance of the data. Pearson’s
product-moment correlation (2-way) was conducted to
determine the relationships between 505 times, COD deficit,
and 10- and 30-m sprint times. The preferred and nonpre-
ferred sides were examined separately. An alpha level of p#
0.05 was the criterion for significance. The strength of the
correlation coefficient (r) was described as per Hopkins (12).
An rvalue between 0 to 0.3, and 0 to 20.3, was considered
small; 0.31–0.49, and 20.31 to 20.49, moderate; 0.5–0.69,
and 20.5 to 20.69, large; 0.7–0.89, and 20.7 to 20.89, very
large; and 0.9–1, and 20.9 to 21, near perfect for predicting
relationships.
The second part of the analysis determined whether the
505 time and COD deficit provided a different assessment of
TABLE 1. Descriptive data (mean 6SD; 95% CIs) for 10, 30 m, and 505 times
for the preferred and nonpreferred sides, and COD deficit for the preferred and
nonpreferred sides in experienced male cricketers (n= 17).*
Test Mean 6SD 95% CI
10 m 1.826 60.060 1.795–1.857
30 m 4.417 60.166 4.331–4.502
Preferred 505 2.443 60.089 2.397–2.489
Nonpreferred 505 2.496 60.102 2.443–2.548
Preferred COD deficit 0.617 60.073 0.580–0.655
Nonpreferred COD deficit 0.670 60.087 0.625–0.715
*COD = change of direction.
All variables measured in seconds.
TABLE 2. Correlations for the preferred side between 505 time, COD deficit, and 10- and 30-m sprint times in
experienced male cricketers (n= 17).*
505 time vs.
COD deficit
505 time vs.
10-m sprint
505 time vs.
30-m sprint
COD deficit vs.
10-m sprint
COD deficit vs.
30-m sprint
r0.740.58z0.70§ 20.11 0.097
95% CI 0.41 to 0.90 0.14 to 0.83 0.32 to 0.88 20.56 to 0.39 20.40 to 0.55
R
2
0.55 0.34 0.48 0.013 0.0095
p(2 tailed) 0.001 0.014 0.002 0.667 0.710
*COD = change of direction; r= Pearson’s correlation coefficient; R
2
= explained variance; p= significance.
Significant p,0.0001.
zSignificant p#0.05.
§Significant p,0.01.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca.com
VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 11 | NOVEMBER 2016 | 3027
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
COD ability. To compare variables with different mean and
SDs, a transformation to a normalized score is recommended
(26). Therefore, to compare the relative performance of each
athlete for COD deficit and 505 time, the values were
normalized. To do this, 505 time and COD deficit for the
preferred and nonpreferred legs were converted to z-scores,
by the formula: z-score = (subject’s test score 2mean score
from the sample)/SD. As for the correlation analysis, pre-
ferred and nonpreferred sides
were analyzed separately. The
difference in z-scores (505 def-
icit 2505 time) was deter-
mined and compared with the
smallest worthwhile change
(SWC) for the sample. The
SWC is equal to the between-
subject SD multiplied by 0.2,
which is the typical small effect
(13). As these were standard-
ized scores, the SD is 1.0 and
therefore, the SWC is simply
0.2. Those subjects that had
a z-score ($0.2) difference ex-
ceeded the SWC and were
deemed to have a meaningful
difference in the COD ability
assessment provided by the
505 time and COD deficit.
Therefore, a positive difference
in z-scores indicated an overes-
timate of COD ability, and
a negative difference in z-scores
indicated an underestimate of
COD ability.
RESULTS
Descriptive data for all the tests
are shown in Table 1. The trial-
to-trial reliability for the 10 m
(ICC: 0.91), 30 m (ICC: 0.98),
and preferred (ICC: 0.84) and
nonpreferred (ICC: 0.78) 505
TABLE 3. Correlations for the nonpreferred side between 505 time, COD deficit, and 10- and 30-m sprint times in
experienced male cricketers (n= 17).*
505 time vs.
COD deficit
505 time vs.
10-m sprint
505 time vs.
30-m sprint
COD deficit vs.
10-m sprint
COD deficit vs.
30-m sprint
r0.810.52z0.63§ 20.082 0.097
95% CI 0.54 to 0.93 0.051 to 0.80 0.22 to 0.85 20.54 to 0.41 20.40 to 0.55
R
2
0.65 0.27 0.40 0.0068 0.0095
p(2 tailed) ,0.0001 0.033 0.006 0.754 0.710
*COD = change of direction; r= Pearson’s correlation coefficient; R
2
= explained variance; p= significance.
Significant p,0.0001.
zSignificant p#0.05.
§Significant p,0.01.
Figure 2. Z-score of the COD time and COD deficit for each subject of the (A) preferred side results and (B)
nonpreferred side results. The * represents subjects where opposite COD abilities were indicated by the 505 time
vs. the 505 deficit. COD, change of direction.
Change of Direction Deficit in Cricket Players
3028
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
times, were all considered acceptable. The correlation
between 10- and 30-m sprint times was significant and con-
sidered near perfect (r= 0.91; 95% CI [0.77–0.97]; p#
0.0001). The correlation data with 95% CI for the preferred
side are shown in Table 2, and for the nonpreferred side in
Table 3. With regard to the preferred side, the 505 time had
a significant and very large correlation with the COD deficit
and a large to very large correlations with 10- and 30-m
sprint time, respectively. A similar trend was found for the
nonpreferred side, with a very large, significant relationship
between 505 time and COD deficit and 505 time had large
significant relationships with the 10- and 30-m sprint times.
However, the COD deficit did not significantly correlate
with the 10- or 30-m sprint times for both the preferred
and nonpreferred sides. All significant relationships were
positive, which meant subjects that had a lower time in
one measure, also had a lower time in the other measure.
Figure 2 displays the z-scores for the 505 total time and
COD deficit for the preferred and nonpreferred side for each
subject. For the preferred side, both the 505 time and COD
deficit for all subjects provided directionally similar indica-
tions of COD ability. However, for the nonpreferred side, 5
of 17 subjects (29%) had a 505
time and COD deficit that sug-
gested opposite COD abilities.
For 3 subjects, the 505 indi-
cated better than average
COD performance, while the
COD deficit suggested it was
less than average, whereas for
the other 2 subjects, the oppo-
site was true.
Figure 3 displays the differ-
ences in the z-scores (COD
deficit 2505 time) for the pre-
ferred and nonpreferred sides.
With regard to the preferred
side, there was a worthwhile
difference for 16 of 17 subjects
(94%). This suggested that 7
subjects had their COD ability
overestimated by the 505 time,
whereas 9 subjects had their
COD ability underestimated.
The trend was similar for the
nonpreferred side, with 15 sub-
jects (88%) having a worthwhile
difference in the standardized
z-scores. The 505 time overesti-
mated the COD ability of 8 sub-
jects and underestimated the
ability of 7 subjects.
DISCUSSION
The challenge in assessing
COD ability is isolating that physical quality in a simple
metric for strength and conditioning coaches. Historically,
the time taken to perform various COD tests was used to
measure an athlete’s capacity to change direction. It is pos-
sible that in many COD tests, an athlete’s ability to actually
change direction may be “masked” by other physical quali-
ties needed within the test (e.g., linear sprinting ability,
anaerobic capacity, and movement specificity for the test)
(27,34,43). As a result, it would be pertinent for strength
and conditioning coaches to be able to use an assessment
that more clearly identifies COD ability. This study investi-
gated the COD deficit, assessed during the 505 in comparison
with one’s 10-m sprint time, to determine whether it provided
a more specific measure of COD ability. The results of this
study suggested that this was the case. The practical relevance
of these findings is strength and conditioning coaches could
potentially use the COD deficit to assess COD ability in their
athletes, without the requirement of additional equipment or
adoption of new field tests. Although this study investigated
cricketers, this research has potential for crossover into other
athletic populations simply trying to evaluate the physical
capacity to change direction.
Figure 3. Difference in standardized scores (COD deficit 2505 time) of the (A) preferred side results and (B)
nonpreferred side results. The bars indicate subjects where the difference in the z-scores was greater than an
SWC or difference in performance. The SWC is indicated by the horizontal dotted lines. As the scores are
presented in z-scores, the SD = 1.0, therefore the SWC (0.2 31.0) is simply 0.2. COD, change of direction;
SWC, smallest worthwhile change.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca.com
VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 11 | NOVEMBER 2016 | 3029
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
An issue with many COD tests is that because of the
relatively large volume of linear sprinting, an athlete with
superior straight-line running ability could use this physical
quality to mask any COD deficiencies that were previously
expected to be assessed within a test (34). This overlap
between linear sprint ability and apparent COD ability
(determined by tests with primarily linear running volume)
is supported by the significant relationships between COD
and linear speed tests (11,22,30,34,43), which was also the
case in this study with 505, 10-, and 30-m sprint times (Table
2). The 505 involves a 15-m sprint (although only the last
5 m is timed) before the subject reaches the turning line (6)
and completes an additional 5 m, which indicates why there
were relationships with linear speed in this study. As dis-
cussed previously by Nimphius et al. (27), the relationship
between total time in a COD test and linear sprint times can
be explained by the small large amount of time spent run-
ning linearly (69%) vs. the time spent “actually changing
direction” (31%). This is partly why (34) recommended mea-
suring the time in the first meter after a COD to limit the
influence of linear running speed. The value of restricting the
measurement of COD ability to the action itself is supported
by Spiteri et al. (39), who in an analysis of stronger (who
were faster) and weaker (who were slower) recreational ath-
letes, found that the poststride velocity (velocity of the first
step out) after a 458COD, and not total time to complete the
test, was one of the key kinematic variables that distin-
guished the groups. However, as previously acknowledged,
measuring an athlete’s exit velocity after a COD is difficult to
do in the field. Therefore, the COD deficit was designed as
a practical way to isolate the measurement of an athlete
changing direction (27).
The correlation analysis indicated very large relationships
between the 505 and COD deficit for both legs (Table 2),
which would be expected if both are reported to measure
COD ability. However, although there were significant rela-
tionships between the 505 time for both legs and linear
speed, this was not the case for the COD deficit (Table 2).
The COD deficit calculated from the 505 provides a measure
of the time required to add 1 1808COD to a 10-m sprint
(27). Thus the larger the deficit, the less effective the direc-
tion change or the lower the ability of an athlete to change
direction relative to their physical capability for linear speed.
It is important to note that the COD deficit is a measure that
provides information on COD ability relative to one’s speed
sprint speed instead of being inclusive of one’s sprint speed
as would be the case for total time. If an athlete improves
their linear speed but does not improve their COD ability,
the total 505 time may decline (perceived COD improve-
ment), whereas the COD deficit would either remain the
same or potentially become worse if they can not handle
their new speed capacity when entering a COD. Given that
the COD deficit did not relate to linear speed, yet did relate
to the 505 times, provides some evidence that this test mea-
sured COD performance without the influence of linear
speed in cricketers. Potentially, the COD deficit provides
a practical way to restrict the measurement of COD perfor-
mance to the action itself while separating COD ability from
the physical capacity of sprint speed.
An important concern for strength and conditioning
coaches is that they are able to correctly identify strengths
and weaknesses for their athletes from performance test
results (25). This relates to the validity of a test, in that, the
test data accurately reflect the physical quality those are
supposed to measure. A further issue for the coach is that
valid tests that are determined in the controlled, laboratory
environment need to have a practical equivalent, while still
maintaining acceptable reliability. The results from this study
indicated that the measurement of 505 time, although reli-
able (11,34,40), exhibited some of the problems noted by
(34). When comparing the z-scores, there were 4 subjects
who had 505 time and COD deficit results that indicated
opposing COD abilities (i.e., a faster 505 time, but worse
COD deficit, or vice versa) (Figure 2). This is a concern, as
coaches can often use test results to inform the decisions
they make with regard to training and team selection (25).
A further note is that the conflicts between 505 time and
COD deficit only occurred for the nonpreferred side. This is
a particular issue for cricketers, as coaching practice outlines
that batsmen should complete the turn when running
between the wickets while facing the location of the ball
(4). As a result, they must be proficient turning from each
side. Given most athletes generally attempt to have a balance
between the legs for multidirectional movements (17), 505
time may not properly indicate COD ability in experienced
athletes, and this may be specific to the side that is tested.
There were also worthwhile differences between the 505
time and COD deficit for almost all subjects on the preferred
(94%) and nonpreferred (88%) sides, whether it was an
overestimation or underestimation of COD ability (Figure 3).
Taken together with the correlations from this study (Tables
2 and 3), the z-score comparison (Figure 2) and the findings
of (34) 505 time may not provide the best indication of COD
ability because of the linear sprinting that still features in this
test result. In contrast, the COD deficit eliminates the con-
tribution of linear speed (Tables 2 and 3), and thus seemed to
provide a more isolated measure of COD performance for
the cricketers in this study. This is very noteworthy for the
strength and conditioning coach. If test time alone does not
always provide an accurate and valid measure of how effec-
tively an athlete changes direction (34), then the COD def-
icit could provide this information for a coach. In support of
research that has documented the importance of measuring
COD performance over short distances in the laboratory
(34,39), the COD deficit potentially provides a practical
way to measure this in the field. This information can then
be used to drive coaches training practice, as they will have
potentially more valid information as to which of their ath-
letes need to improve their COD ability, as defined by their
COD deficit.
Change of Direction Deficit in Cricket Players
3030
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
There are limitations for this study that should be
acknowledged. Cricketers were the only athletes analyzed
in this study, so the COD deficit may differ across different
athletes. Nonetheless, because of the importance of the 1808
COD to cricket (7,15,18,23), the sample was appropriate for
this study, as the subjects were experienced with the move-
ment. In addition to this, only a 1808COD was investigated
in this study. A COD deficit may be specific to the angle of
the direction change. Future research should investigate the
COD deficit as measured from the 505 for athletes from
different sports and for different angles of direction changes.
This study also did not include technical analysis for COD
ability, as all testing was field based. Laboratory-based stud-
ies can provided more detailed technical information (34,39),
and future research should investigate relationships between
the COD deficit and entry and exit velocities when changing
direction in athletes. However, the focus of this study was to
provide practical information that a coach could directly use
in testing and training, which adds value to the study findings.
Because of the importance of poststride velocity and the tech-
nique of a direction change (39), future research should also
investigate how technique influences the COD deficit.
Nevertheless, there is practical value in the results from
this study. The COD deficit seems to provide a more isolated
measure of physical performance than 505 test time alone, as
it reduces the effect of linear sprinting speed within a COD
test. Strength and conditioning coaches should consider
incorporating the COD deficit into their athlete testing
protocols. Further research, however, is required to confirm
the validity of the COD deficit, through the assessment of
different athletic populations. Finally, consideration of the
COD deficit in conjunction with video analysis or other
practical measures of isolating COD performance may help
better identify the strengths and weaknesses of an athlete in
COD performance, and thus allow for better prescription
and athlete development.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
The COD deficit and 505 time seem to provide different
assessments of the physical capacity of COD ability. Strength
and conditioning coaches who use the 505 should also
calculate the COD deficit to provide a potentially more specific
measure of COD ability. Because many coaches will also
measure 10-m sprint performance in their assessments in linear
speed, it should not take too much extraeffort to calculate the
COD deficit for a squad of athletes, especially if this can
elucidate useful information. Coaches who do not use the 505
should consider adding this assessment to their protocols, so
that they could use the COD deficit, as it seems to better isolate
the ability to change direction. There are also several avenues
for research investigating the COD deficit (e.g., validation of
the COD deficit in different athletic populations, relationships
between COD deficit and technique, and effects of training on
the COD deficit), which provides practical application for
researchers and sport science practitioners as well.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge their subjects for
their contribution to the study. Thanks also to Matthew
Jeffriess for assisting with data collection. This research
project received no external financial assistance. None of the
authors have any conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Baumgartner, TA and Chung, H. Confidence limits for intraclass
reliability coefficients. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 5: 179–188, 2001.
2. Besier, TF, Lloyd, DG, Ackland, TR, and Cochrane, JL.
Anticipatory effects on knee joint loading during running and
cutting maneuvers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 1176–1181, 2001.
3. Brughelli, M, Cronin, J, Levin, G, and Chaouachi, A. Understanding
change of direction ability in sport. Sports Med 38: 1045–1063, 2008.
4. Buckley, M. Australian Cricket Coach: Your Complete Guide to Coaching
Cricket. Melbourne, Victoria: Cricket Australia, 2013.
5. Callaghan, S J, Lockie, RG, and Jeffriess, MD. The acceleration
kinematics of cricket-specific starts when completing a quick single.
Sports Tech 7: 39–51, 2014.
6. Draper, JA and Lancaster, MG. The 505 test: A test for agility in the
horizontal plane. Aust J Sci Med Sport 17: 15–18, 1985.
7. Duffield, R and Drinkwater, EJ. Time-motion analysis of test and
one-day international cricket centuries. J Sports Sci 26: 457–464,
2008.
8. Duthie, G M, Pyne, DB, Marsh, DJ, and Hooper, SL. Sprint patterns
in rugby union players during competition. J Strength Cond Res 20:
208–214, 2006.
9. Farrow, D, Young, W, and Bruce, L. The development of a test of
reactive agility for netball: A new methodology. J Sci Med Sport 8:
52–60, 2005.
10. Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Buchner, A, and Lang, A-G. Statistical power
analyses using g*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression
analyses. Behav Res Methods 41: 1149–1160, 2009.
11. Gabbett, TJ, Kelly, JN, and Sheppard, JM. Speed, change of direction
speed, and reactive agility of rugby league players. J Strength Cond
Res 22: 174–181, 2008.
12. Hopkins, WG. A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics A new view
of statistics from http://sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html,
2002. Accessed October 6, 2011.
13. Hopkins, WG. How to interpret changes in an athletic performance
test. Sportscience 8: 1–7, 2004.
14. Hori, N, Newton, RU, Kawamori, N, McGuigan, MR, Kraemer, WJ,
and Nosaka, K. Reliability of performance measurements derived
from ground reaction force data during countermovement jump and
the influence of sampling frequency. J Strength Cond Res 23: 874–
882, 2009.
15. Houghton, LA. Running between the wickets in cricket: What is the
fastest technique? Int J Sports Sci Coach 5: 101–107, 2010.
16. Jarvis, S, Sullivan, LO, Davies, B, Wiltshire, H, and Baker, JS.
Interrelationships between measured running intensities and agility
performance in subelite rugby union players. Res Sports Med 17 : 2 17
230, 2009.
17. Lockie, RG, Callaghan, SJ, Berry, SP, Cooke, ER, Jordan, CA,
Luczo, TM, and Jeffriess, MD. Relationship between unilateral
jumping ability and asymmetry on multidirectional speed in team-
sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res 28: 3557–3566, 2014.
18. Lockie, RG, Callaghan, SJ, and Jeffriess, MD. Analysis of specific
speed testing for cricketers. J Strength Cond Res 27: 2981–2988, 2013.
19. Lockie, RG, Callaghan, SJ, McGann, TS, and Jeffriess, MD. Ankle
muscle function during preferred and non-preferred 458directional
cutting in semi-professional basketball players. Int J Perform Anal
Sport 14: 574–593, 2014.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
|
www.nsca.com
VOLUME 30 | NUMBER 11 | NOVEMBER 2016 | 3031
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
20. Lockie, RG, Murphy, AJ, Knight, TJ, and Janse de Jonge, XAK.
Factors that differentiate acceleration ability in field sport athletes.
J Strength Cond Res 25: 2704–2714, 2011.
21. Lockie, RG, Schultz, AB, Callaghan, SJ, and Jeffriess, MD. The
effects of traditional and enforced stopping speed and agility training
on multidirectional speed and athletic performance. J Strength Cond
Res 28: 1538–1551, 2014.
22. Lockie, RG, Schultz, AB, Callaghan, SJ, Jeffriess, MD, and Berry, SP.
Reliability and validity of a new test of change-of-direction speed for
field-based sports: The change-of-direction and acceleration test
(CODAT). J Sports Sci Med 12: 88–96, 2013.
23. Loock, N, Du Toit, DE, Ventner, DJ, and Stretch, RA. Effect of
different types of cricket batting pads on the running and turning
speed in cricket batting. Sports Biomech 5: 15–22, 2006.
24. Maio Alves, JM, Rebelo, AN, Abrantes, C, and Sampaio, J. Short-
term effects of complex and contrast training in soccer players’
vertical jump, sprint, and agility abilities. J Strength Cond Res 24:
936–941, 2010.
25. McGuigan, MR, Cormack, SJ, and Gill, ND. Strength and power
profiling of athletes: Selecting tests and how to use the information
for program design. Strength Cond J 35: 7–14, 2013.
26. Newton, RU and Dugan, E. Application of strength diagnosis.
Strength Cond J 24: 50, 2002.
27. Nimphius, S, Geib, G, Spiteri, T, and Carlisle, D. “Change of
direction” deficit measurement in division I american football
players. J Aust Strength Cond 21: 115–117, 2013.
28. Nimphius, S, McGuigan, MR, and Newton, RU. Relationship
between strength, power, speed, and change of direction performance
of female softball players. J Strength Cond Res 24: 885–895, 2010.
29. Nimphius, S, McGuigan, MR, and Newton, RU. Changes in muscle
architecture and performance during a competitive season in female
softball players. J Strength Cond Res 26: 2655–2666, 2012.
30. Pauole, K, Madole, K, Garhammer, J, Lacourse, M, and Rozenek, R.
Reliability and validity of the t-test as a measure of agility, leg power,
and leg speed in college-aged men and women. J Strength Cond Res
14: 443–450, 2000.
31. Robbins, DW. The national football league (nfl) combine: Does
normalized data better predict performance in the nfl draft? J
Strength Cond Res 24: 2888–2899, 2010.
32. Salaj, S and Markovic, G. Specificity of jumping, sprinting, and quick
change-of-direction motor abilities. J Strength Cond Res 25: 1249–
1255, 2011.
33. Sassi, RH, Dardouri, W, Yahmed, MH, Gmada, N,
Mahfoudhi, ME, and Gharbi, Z. Relative and absolute reliability
of a modified agility t-test and its relationship with vertical
jump and straight sprint. JStrengthCondRes23: 1644–1651,
2009.
34. Sayers, MG. The influence of test distance on change of direction
speed test results. J Strength Cond Res 29: 2412–2416, 2015.
35. Sheppard, JM, Dawes, JJ, Jeffreys, I, Spiteri, T, and Nimphius, S.
Broadening the view of agility: A scientific review of the literature.
J Aust Strength Cond 22: 6–25, 2014.
36. Sheppard, JM and Young, WB. Agility literature review:
Classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci 24: 919–932, 2006.
37. Sierer, SP, Battaglini, CL, Mihalik, JP, Shields, EW, and
Tomasini, NT. The national football league combine: Performance
differences between drafted and nondrafted players entering the
2004 and 2005 drafts. J Strength Cond Res 22: 6–12, 2008.
38. Smith, RG, Harley, RA, and Stockill, NP. Cricket. In: Sport and
Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines: The British Association of Sport
and Exercise Sciences Guide. EM Winter, AM Jones, RCR Davison,
PD Bromley, and TH Mercer, eds. London, United Kingdom:
Routledge, 2007. pp. 225–231.
39. Spiteri, T, Cochrane, J L, Hart, NH, Haff, GG, and Nimphius, S.
Effect of strength on plant foot kinetics and kinematics during
a change of direction task. Eur J Sport Sci 13: 646–652, 2013.
40. Stewart, PF, Turner, AN, and Miller, SC. Reliability, factorial
validity, and interrelationships of five commonly used change
of direction speed tests. Scand J Med Sci Sports 24: 500–506,
2014.
41. Van Gelder, LH and Bartz, SD. The effect of acute stretching on
agility performance. J Strength Cond Res 25: 3014–3021, 2011.
42. Vescovi, JD, Brown, TD, and Murray, TM. Positional characteristics
of physical performance in division I college female soccer players.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness 46: 221–226, 2006.
43. Vescovi, JD and McGuigan, MR. Relationships between sprinting,
agility, and jump ability in female athletes. J Sports Sci 26: 97–107,
2008.
44. Wilkinson, M, Leedale-Brown, D, and Winter, EM. Validity of
a squash-specific test of change-of-direction speed. Int J Sports
Physiol Perform 4: 176–185, 2009.
45. Young, WB, McDowell, MH, and Scarlett, BJ. Specificity of sprint
and agility training methods. J Strength Cond Res 15: 315–319,
2001.
Change of Direction Deficit in Cricket Players
3032
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
the
TM
Copyright © National Strength and Conditioning Association Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
... However, currently, most agility and COD test may be inaccurate and unreliable due to the over-reliance on linear sprint speed without focusing on the technical execution of COD movement [14,15]. The concept of Change of Direction Deficit (CODD) is a measure that is assumed can better indicate an athlete's ability in Change of Direction (COD) compared to simple time completion tests for the speed of COD [16,17]. There is evidence in studies conducted on CODD time and linear sprint time with several investigations reporting that athletes with faster sprint time showed to have a larger CODD indicating no significant influence of speed on the CODD time [18,19]. ...
... Others have also suggested that sprint momentum can be a valuable indicator of CODD and needs further examination [20]. CODD has been classified as an absolute measure of COD since it has proven to provide accuracy when used [16]. Henceforth findings from other studies have all demonstrated a substantial relationship between the CODD and the COD test used but small relation with the sprint speed performance. ...
... The correlation (association) between CODS and CODD timings and all the performance measures was calculated for both the drafted and undrafted groups using Pearson's correlation (r) analysis. Hopkins [16] quantified the degree of the correlation coefficient as Between 0 and 0.30, or 0 and -0.30, the r value was considered small; between 0.31 and 0.49, or -0.31 to -0.49, it was considered moderate; between 0.50 and 0.69, or -0.50 to -0.69, it was considered large; between 0.70 and 0.89, or -0.70 to -0.89, it was considered very large; and between 0.90 and 1, or -0.90 to -1, it was almost perfect. ...
Article
Full-text available
The majority of COD execution assessments employ the use of total time as the metric by which COD performance is judged. This study investigated the relationships between CODD time, sprint time, 5-10-5 and jump performance. Performance data of 328 participants of the 2021 NFL Combine (age: 22.35 ± 1.00 years; height: 1.87 ± 0.07m; weight: 108.51 ± 21.61kg) was collected and used for the analysis. CODD correlated to the 5- 10-5 pro-agility (r= 0.69 - 0.71) test but not sprint time (r= 0.15 - 0.27) for both the drafted and undrafted groups. Meanwhile, there was a large to very large association between 5-10-5 proagility time and the sprint variables (r = 0.62 - 0.82) for both drafted and undrafted groups. The correlation between CODD time and momentum was minor (r= 0.26 – 0.28) for both drafted and undrafted groups, but the 5-10-5 pro-agility reported a strong to a very strong association with momentum (r= 0.57 – 0.75). There was an inversely small correlation between CODD time and VJh (r= – 0.27) and BJ (r= -0.25– -0.28) for both drafted and undrafted groups whereas the 5-10-5 pro-agility time reported an inversely large to very large correlation with VJH (r= -0.51 – -0.68) and BJ (r= -0.57 – -0.71) on both groups. The magnitude and impact of the momentum, horizontal jump, and vertical jump of participants on their CODD time indicate that coaches and fitness experts should focus on improving the technical aspects of the COD execution when attempting to improve their CODS.
... Agility includes perceptual, decision-making, and change-of-direction (COD) ability. COD ability is regarded as the physical and technical foundation of agility development (14,22). COD ability is the physical skill of slowing, turning, changing direction, and reaccelerating under preplanned conditions, regardless of stimuli response (12,14). ...
... Generally, COD ability is assessed using the total time required for a COD test. However, due to the strong correlation between CODT and linear sprint speed (9,22,23), relying on total time may over estimate the COD ability of individuals with fast linear sprint speed. This approach also does not isolate direction-changing ability (21). ...
... The term "direction-changing ability" specifically denoted the capacity to change direction independently of one's sprinting. To address this limitation, Nimphius et al. (22) introduced the COD deficit (CODD) by subtracting straight-line running time from COD test time. CODD has been employed to assess COD ability among cricket (22) and football players (20,23). ...
Article
Full-text available
Effective coaching strategies for enhancing change-of-direction (COD) ability in older elementary school boys require innovative assessment approaches due to the pivotal role of this skill in motor control programs. We aimed to (a) conduct a cross-sectional comparison of differences in COD total time (CODT) and COD deficit (CODD) according to chronological age among boys aged 10–12 years and (b) investigate the association of CODT and CODD with height, body mass, and jumping ability. Seventy-eight Japanese boys with chronological age 10–12 years (10.0–10.9 years, n=26; 11.0–11.9 years, n=26; 12.0–12.9 years, n=26) performed 20-m sprint, 505COD, counter-movement jump (CMJ), and rebound jump (RJ) tests; their height and body mass were recorded. Unpaired one-way ANOVA was used to compare each variable between the three groups. CODT (F(2, 75) = 6.21, p = 0.003) and 10-m time (F(2, 75) = 9.49, p = 0.001) were significantly shorter in 12-year-olds than in 10-year-olds; however, no significant differences were observed in CODD, CMJ, and RJ-index. Regarding partial correlation coefficients, CODT showed a significant positive correlation with CODD and 20-m time (r = 0.67 to 0.76, p = 0.001) and a significant negative correlation with CMJ, RJ-index, and RJ-height (r = -0.43 to -0.53, p = 0.001). CODD demonstrated a significant positive correlation with height (r = 0.29, p = 0.011), body mass (r = 0.30, p = 0.008), and sprint momentum (r = 0.28, p = 0.013). These findings suggest that regarding CODD, the development of COD ability did not vary with age, indicating its association with morphological growth. Therefore, COD training should be provided according to children’s morphological and linear sprint speed development.
... All participants completed three trials with 3 min recovery time between them. Furthermore, the COD deficit (COD def ) for the modified 505 test was calculated as follows: 505 COD time -10 m sprint time [27]. The COD deficit calculation was applied to provide a more isolated measure of COD ability, reducing the influence of acceleration and LS ability [27]. ...
... Furthermore, the COD deficit (COD def ) for the modified 505 test was calculated as follows: 505 COD time -10 m sprint time [27]. The COD deficit calculation was applied to provide a more isolated measure of COD ability, reducing the influence of acceleration and LS ability [27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of linear sprint training (LST) compared to curvilinear sprint training (CST) using an equivalent session training volume, on linear (LS) and curvilinear (CS) sprint performance, horizontal force-velocity profile, and change of direction (COD) ability in young soccer players. In a randomized pre-post parallel-group trial design, nineteen U16 male soccer players were randomly assigned to LST (n = 9) and CST (n = 10) groups. Both groups performed 11 sprint training sessions over 6 weeks. Before and after the training period, LS (5 m, 10 m, 15 m, 20 m, and 30 m), CS (weak and good side), horizontal force-velocity profile, and COD speed (modified 505 test) were assessed. The LST showed small to moderate significant enhancements (p ≤ 0.05) in LS (except 5 m sprint), modified 505 test, theoretical maximal velocity (V0), maximal power output (Pmax), and maximal ratio of force (RFpeak) from pre‑test to post‑test. CST resulted in small to moderate significant improvements (p ≤ 0.05) in 10 m, 20 m, and 30 m LS performance, weak and good sides of the CS, COD speed, and Pmax from pre‑test to post‑test. In addition, significant between-group comparisons were observed between LST and CST for CS performance in both sides (p < 0.01). In conclusion, LST and CST seem to produce trajectory-specific adaptations in young soccer players. Therefore, strength and conditioning coaches should integrate both LST and CST training methods to effectively prepare soccer players and enhance their sprinting performance.
... From a practical perspective, our results suggest that foot mobility asymmetry is not only a factor related to injuries but may also impact the efficiency of various sports tasks, such as reactive agility and change of direction speed, as supported by other studies. Biomechanical research indicates that preplanned change-of-direction movements place less load on the knee compared to reactive movements requiring sidestepping, thereby reducing the risk of lower limb injuries [48][49][50]. In contrast, factors that increase injury risk include unplanned one-leg landings, sudden jumps, or lateral slides. ...
Article
Full-text available
Morphological and functional asymmetry of the lower limbs is a well-recognized factor contributing to musculoskeletal injuries among athletes across different levels. However, limited research exists on evaluating foot mobility asymmetry as a potential predictor of such injuries. This study aimed to (1) assess the frequency of foot mobility asymmetries among amateur athletes, (2) investigate the predictive value of foot mobility asymmetry (measured via navicular height drop) for injury risk, and (3) explore the relationship between foot type and injury occurrence. A cross-sectional sampling method was employed to select 45 physically active male amateur athletes (runners and team sports practitioners) from a university. Injury history was retrospectively recorded, and a modified navicular drop test was conducted to classify foot arch height. The predictive power of navicular height drop asymmetry was analyzed using ROC curves, and the relationship between foot type (neutral and defective combinations—pronated or supinated) and injury occurrence was examined using chi-square tests for independence. Multiple logistic regression was applied to calculate injury risk odds ratios across different foot type subgroups. The results revealed a significant frequency (51.1%) of participants with at least one defective foot, including 31.1% with one neutral and one defective foot and 20% with both feet defective. Navicular height drop asymmetry emerged as a valuable predictor of injuries, with a 36% asymmetry identified as the cut-off for increased injury risk (AUC = 0.832, 95% CI: 0.691–0.973, p < 0.001). A significant relationship was found between foot type and injury occurrence. Only one out of 22 participants with neutral feet (4.55%) experienced an injury, compared to 9 out of 14 (64.29%) with one neutral and one defective foot and 5 out of 9 (55.56%) with both feet defective. These differences were statistically significant (χ2 = 16.24, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.60). The odds ratio for injury risk was 37.8 (p = 0.016) for those with asymmetry (one neutral and one defective foot) and 26.3 (p = 0.102) for those with both feet defective, compared to participants with both feet neutral. In clinical practice, these findings suggest that routine screenings for physically active individuals should incorporate foot mobility asymmetry assessment. However, it is essential to integrate this factor with other risk indicators. For individuals exhibiting high asymmetry, general foot defect correction programs may be beneficial, but injury prevention strategies should adopt a more comprehensive approach, focusing on overall fitness and tailored interventions for high-risk individuals.
... Lockie et al., 2020;Tramel et al., 2019). This is not surprising, given that cricket is a sport that requires quick shifts in direction for fielding, batting, and running between the wickets Weldon, et al., 2021;Foden et al., 2015;Nimphius et al., 2016;Thomas et al., 2018). The importance of CODS in cricket cannot be understated, as it underlies many of the dynamic movements intrinsic to the game (Foden et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Cricket demands a unique blend of athleticism, strategy, and precision, with physical fitness crucial in achieving sports excellence. While previous research has highlighted the importance of physical attributes such as speed, explosive power, and agility, the complex interactions between these factors about change of direction speed (CODS) still need to be better understood. This study investigated the relationship between CODS and key physical measures among female cricket players, providing insights into the factors influencing athletic performance in cricket. Thirty female cricketers (aged 16-26 years) participated in the study, undergoing assessments of CODS, speed, vertical jump, and broad jump. Statistical analyses, including Pearson correlation coefficients, multiple regression analysis, and ANOVA, were employed to examine the relationships between these physical measures and CODS. Reliability was deemed to be poor (<0.3), moderate (0.4<0.6), and strong (0.7≤) based on prior research. Significant positive correlations were observed between agility and acceleration and maximal speed tests, underscoring the importance of speed in cricket performance. Furthermore, moderate to strong negative correlations were found between CODS and explosive lower body power tests, highlighting the significance of lower body explosiveness for rapid directional shifts in cricket. Regression analysis revealed that speed, broad jump, and vertical jump collectively contributed to a strong predictive model for agility. Enhancing speed, explosive power, and agility through targeted training interventions could improve cricket players' on-field performance and competitive edge. Overall, this study contributes to understanding the complex interactions between physical attributes and cricket performance, offering practical insights for player development and strategic improvement. Key Words: Change of Direction Speed; Physical Attributes; Explosive Power; Agility
... Procedures for the 5-0-5 test were adapted from previous research [34], and similarly to the ADA test, started with participants in a two-point, staggered stance. Participants accelerated maximally over 10 meters, with a 180-degree turn performed at the 15-meter marker, which was marked with cones and tape. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of lower limb wearable resistance on maximal horizontal deceleration biomechanics, across two different assessments. Twenty recreationally trained team sport athletes performed acceleration to deceleration assessments (ADA), and 5-0-5 change of direction (COD) tests across three load conditions (unloaded, 2% of BW, 4% of body weight (BW)), with load attached to the anterior and posterior thighs and shanks. Linear mixed effect models with participant ID as the random effect, and load condition as the fixed effect were used to study load-specific biomechanical differences in deceleration mechanics across both tests. Primary study findings indicate that for the ADA, in the 4% BW condition, participants exhibited significantly greater degrees of Avg Approach Momentum, as well as significant reductions in deceleration phase center of mass (COM) drop, and Avg Brake Step ground contact deceleration (GCD) in both the 2% BW, and 4% BW condition, compared to the unloaded condition. In the 5-0-5 tests, participants experienced significant reductions in Avg Approach Velocity, Avg deceleration (DEC), and Stopping Time in the 4% BW condition compared to the unloaded condition. Similar to the ADA test, participants also experienced significant reductions in Avg Brake Step GCD in both the 2% BW and 4% BW conditions, and significant increases in Avg Approach Momentum in the 4% BW condition, compared to the unloaded condition. Therefore, findings suggest that based on the test, and metric of interest, the addition of lower limb wearable resistance led to acute differences in maximal horizontal deceleration biomechanics. However, future investigations are warranted to further explore if the use of lower limb wearable resistance could present as an effective training tool in enhancing athlete’s horizontal deceleration and change of direction performance.
... Moreover, proximal-distal muscle sequencing might have been affected when a harness was used rather than just a hip belt (Spudić, Smajla, et al., 2021). Furthermore, it could be speculated that the CoD deficit, a measure that is not influenced by athlete's acceleration capability (Nimphius et al., 2016), would be a better measure reflecting the eccentric and subsequent concentric muscle actions during direction change. Moreover, by using a cone in the 180° turn test, the technique of the turn could differ from the typically representative 180-degree turn in sports, making the test less sensitive to sport-specific tasks. ...
Article
Full-text available
The objectives of our study were 1) to examine whether the force-velocity-power (FvP) outcomes in the concentric and eccentric phases of flywheel (FW) squats differ among sports disciplines and 2) to investigate the association between FvP outcome variables and two key sport-performance indicators: countermovement jump height (CMJ) and change of direction (CoD) time involving 90° or 180° turns. Tests were performed by 469 athletes from five different sport disciplines and physical education students. Our results showed that FvP outcomes, when measured during the eccentric phase of the FW squat, effectively differed between athletes from different sports. However, during the concentric phase of the squat, only for the slope variable differences between sports were found. Contrary to our hypothesis, there were no statistically significant correlations between FW squat FvP outcomes and CMJ or CoD test results. These results suggest that FvP outcomes derived from FW squats may lack external validity and cannot be reliably used as a predictor of athletes’ jumping and agility performance. The paper discusses possible reasons for the larger differences between sports in eccentric FvP outcomes, as well as the absence of correlations between FvP outcomes and functional tests.
... Similar results were observed in male athletes playing 280 team sports in the CODD and acceleration (sprint 10-m) (r = -0.11) 10 . The hypothesis of Fernandes 281 et al. 16 is supported by previous research linking CODD mainly to the braking phase and thus to 282 eccentric-type strength 30 . ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Different studies indicate that female players in team sports, such as soccer, tend to have a lower change of direction deficit (CODD) than their male counterparts and that players who performed better in linear and curved sprints tended to have a worse CODD, suggesting that maximum speed does not equate to a faster change of direction (COD). This study assessed how performance variables related to speed and jumping influence the variability of %CODD among adult highly trained female soccer players. Methods: Fifty-two highly trained female soccer players (age: 23.1 ± 3.25 years; height: 163.6 ± 5.49 cm; weight: 59.7 ± 5.71 kg) participated in this study and performed 180COD, 40-m sprint, countermovement jump (CMJ), and standing broad jump (SBJ) tests. Results: Significant correlations were found between 180CODL, %CODDR, %CODDL, and between-limbs SBJ asymmetry (r = 0.28 to 0.74). A very large correlation existed between %CODDR and %CODDL (r = 0.91). Regression analyses indicated a strong inverse relationship between the 10-m sprint time and %CODDR and %CODDL. No predictive models were found for 180COD in either limb. Differences in performance variables such as 180CODR, 180CODL, and asymmetry %CODD were significant between the high and low %CODD groups, with moderate to large effect sizes. Conclusions: The present study suggests that specific physical performance variables, particularly acceleration and unilateral horizontal jumping, are vital to improving COD in highly trained female soccer players, highlighting the need for specific training interventions.
Article
El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar el perfil morfológico y funcional por posición en jugadoras de fútbol femenino bogotanas. La muestra fue de 81 jugadoras con una edad promedio (15,58±0,85 años), talla (159,4±5,36 cm) y masa corporal (54,55±6,82 kg), seleccionadas en seis posiciones: portera (P, n:8), defensa central (DC, n:13), defensa lateral (DL, n:14), volante central (VC, n:18), volante lateral (VL, n:11) y delantera (DEL, n:17). Estudio de enfoque cuantitativo, diseño no experimental y tipo descriptivo con un muestreo no probabilístico, las pruebas empleadas fueron el test de campo Yo-yo test de recuperación intermitente nivel uno, el test sprint Bangsbo, el test de velocidad 15 y 30 metros, mientras que, la fuerza se evaluó a través de plataformas uniaxiales. La determinación del somatotipo se realizó a partir del método Heath y Carter. El tratamiento estadístico fue realizado mediante el programa R versión 4.1.0. Los resultados evidencian que, entre las diversas posiciones existen diferencias significativas entre variables relacionadas con el peso (p=0.03), la masa libre de grasa (p=0.01), la fuerza neta en pierna derecha en 100 ms [N] (p=0.04), fuerza neta pierna derecha 150ms [N] (p=0.03), fuerza neta pierna derecha 200ms [N] (p=0.03), promedio de habilidad de sprint repetido (RSA) (p=0.00) y porcentaje de fatiga (p=0.00). Del estudio, se puede concluir que, si existen diferencias significativas vinculadas al rol por posición de juego que desempeña cada jugadora en competencia, por lo que, establecer el perfil neuromuscular de la deportista es un punto de partida para fortalecer la estructuración del proceso de entrenamiento en el fútbol femenino.
Article
Full-text available
Preparing athletes for competition requires the diagnosis and monitoring of relevant physical qualities (e.g., strength, power, speed, endurance characteristics). Decisions regarding test selection that attempt to measure these physical attributes are fundamental to the training process yet are complicated by the myriad of tests and measurements available. This article presents an evidenced based process to inform test measurement selection for the physical preparation of athletes. We describe a method for incorporating multiple layers of validity to link test measurement to competition outcome. This is followed by a framework by which to evaluate the suitability of test measurements based on contemporary validity theory that considers technical, decision-making, and organisational factors. Example applications of the framework are described to demonstrate its utility in different settings. The systems presented here will assist in distilling the range of measurements available into those most likely to have the greatest impact on competition performance.
Article
Full-text available
Change of direction (COD) ability is an important physical fitness capacity required in conjunction with cognitive-perceptual ability to perform effective and efficient agility manoeuvres in many sports (4). Although, the physical capacity to change direction is often measured by strength and conditioning professionals, the ability of these common COD tests (presented as time to complete a running task) to truly measure one’s ability to decelerate and subsequently reaccelerate in a new direction is often tangled within one’s ability to perform straight line running. This has been demonstrated with large to very large correlations found between COD tests and straight-line sprint speed in various studies (1, 3, 5). The reason for continuing to use these common COD tests, such as the T-test, 505 and pro-agility is often due to existing data to compare athlete performances and ease of data collection. Some researchers have used the velocity of the centre of mass as a true measure of COD ability (6). Although assessing COD ability by measuring athlete COM out of a COD step provides a direct measure of COD ability, the scope for strength and conditioning professionals to be able to use this type of assessment is small due to time and equipment constraints. A proposed method, termed “change of direction deficit”, to assess COD ability was calculated to assess if this measure could better isolate COD ability independent of one’s straight-line sprint ability.
Article
Full-text available
No research has analysed the influence of ankle muscle activity for joint mobility and stability on preferred directional cutting. Twelve basketballers completed the Y-shaped agility test, requiring 45° cuts to the left or right, to assess planned and reactive cutting. In planned conditions, participants knew the cutting direction. In reactive conditions, participants responded to a randomly illuminated gate. Legs were defined as the outside (furthest from target gate) or inside (closest to target gate) cut legs. The preferred outside cutting leg was determined from the fastest planned cut. Electromyography measured peak normalised (against 10-meter sprint performance) activity of the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus (PL), peroneus brevis (PB), and soleus. Paired t-tests (p Keywords: AGILITY; COURT SPORTS; DOMINANT LEG; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; PERONEALS Document Type: Research Article Publication date: August 1, 2014 More about this publication? Editorial Board Information for Authors Subscribe to this Title Terms & Conditions ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites $(document).ready(function() { var shortdescription = $(".originaldescription").text().replace(/\\&/g, '&').replace(/\\, '<').replace(/\\>/g, '>').replace(/\\t/g, ' ').replace(/\\n/g, ''); if (shortdescription.length > 350){ shortdescription = "" + shortdescription.substring(0,250) + "... more"; } $(".descriptionitem").prepend(shortdescription); $(".shortdescription a").click(function() { $(".shortdescription").hide(); $(".originaldescription").slideDown(); return false; }); }); Related content In this: publication By this: publisher In this Subject: Internal Medicine By this author: Lockie, Robert G. ; Jeffriess, Matthew D. ; McGann, Tye S. ; Callaghan, Samuel J. GA_googleFillSlot("Horizontal_banner_bottom");
Article
Full-text available
The influence of unilateral jump performance, and between-leg asymmetries, on multidirectional speed have not been widely researched. This study analyzed how speed related to unilateral jumping. Multidirectional speed was measured by 20-m sprint (0-5, 0-10, 0-20 m intervals), left- and right-leg turn 505, and modified T-test performance. Unilateral jump performance, and between-leg asymmetries, was measured by vertical (VJ), standing broad (SBJ), and lateral (LJ) jumping. Thirty male team sport athletes (age = 22.60 3.86 years; height = 1.80 0.07 m; mass = 79.03 12.26 kilograms) were recruited. Pearson's correlations (r) determined speed and jump performance relationships; stepwise regression ascertained jump predictors of speed (p < 0.05). Subjects were divided into lesser and greater asymmetry groups from each jump condition. A one-way analysis of variance found between-group differences (p < 0.05). Left-leg VJ correlated with the 0-10 and 0-20 m intervals (r = -0.437 to -0.486). Right-leg VJ correlated with all sprint intervals and the T-test (r = -0.380 to -0.512). Left-leg SBJ and LJ correlated with all tests (r = -0.370 to -0.729). Right-leg SBJ and LJ related to all except the left-leg turn 505 (r = -0.415 to -0.650). Left-leg SBJ predicted the 20-m sprint. Left-leg LJ predicted the 505 and T-test. Regardless of the asymmetry used to form groups, no differences in speed were established. Horizontal and lateral jump performance related to multidirectional speed. Athletes with asymmetries similar to this study (VJ = ∼10%; SBJ = ∼3%; LJ = ∼5%) should not experience speed detriments.
Article
Full-text available
The cricket quick single has received minimal scientific analysis. This study investigated the acceleration kinematics of the non-striking batsmen during a quick single. A total of 20 cricketers completed 17.68-m sprints following three starts: standard (no cricket-specific equipment), static cricket (side-on start, bat held on crease) and rolling cricket (walking start, bat dragged through crease). Timing gates recorded 0–5 m and 0–17.68 m time. Participants wore leg guards and carried a bat during cricket-specific sprints. Joint and step kinematics were investigated through the first and second steps via motion analysis. A repeated measures analysis of variance determined significant (p < 0.05) within-participant differences between conditions. The rolling cricket start resulted in faster 0–5 m and 0–17.68 m times, and a 12% longer first, and 8% longer second, step. For cricket-specific sprints, shoulder sagittal plane range of motion (ROM) and elbow extension decreased in the arm carrying the bat. In response to this reduced arm ROM, hip flexion decreased. There were no changes to hip extension. Shoulder and wrist frontal plane ROM, and wrist sagittal plane ROM, increased as a result of carrying the bat. The need for cricketers to use specialised equipment while completing a quick single resulted in specific acceleration kinematic alterations.
Article
Strength and power diagnosis can provide valuable insights into the different capacities of athletes. The strength and power tests chosen should be reliable and valid and take into account the requirements of the sport and what is a meaningful change in performance. The results of these tests need to be reported in a clear, meaningful, and timely manner for coaches if they are to have maximal impact on training programs. The practitioner can use this evidence-based information in conjunction with the art of coaching to maximize training program effectiveness.
Article
In an attempt to develop a new measure of agility in the horizontal plane, this study examines several tests, including: the Illinois agility test, the 20m dash and two new tests - the Up and Back (UAB) and 505 tests, which both involve a short sprint and a reversal of direction. Eighteen subjects performed the tests in a randomised order. A strobe video and time were used to record the displacement data of the subjects, over set intervals, in the UAB and 505 tests. These data were then smoothed using a least-squares polynomial, and differentiated to produce a velocity and acceleration values. Times were recorded for the completion of the Illinois agility test and the 20m dash. The results for the four tests and the derived velocity and acceleration values were subjected to a correlation matrix. Significant correlations were found between the 505 test and acceleration values, but not with velocity values. The other tests correlated significantly with each other. It is concluded that the UAB test and Illinois Agility test are not purely agility tests because of their significant relationships with the 20m dash. The 505 test, however, has no significant correlation with velocity, but rather with acceleration. Therefore, the 505 test is seen as the test which best isolates agility in the horizontal plane.
Article
This study assessed the relationships between linear running velocity and change of direction (CoD) ability, and how assessing CoD ability over distances ≤ 5 m influences test reliability. Participants (n=15) from amateur rugby league teams performed three trials of a 20 m sprint test (light gates at 5 m, 10 m and 20 m) and six trials of the 5-0-5 agility test. Twelve participants repeated the 5-0-5 test several weeks later. A three-dimensional motion capture system (250 Hz) was used to track the centre of mass at 0.3 m, 0.5 m and 1.0 m either side of the turn and identify specific CoD phase times. Pearson's correlations showed strong, significant relationships between the 5-0-5 time and 5 m (r=0.89, P<0.001); 10 m (r=0.91, P<0.001) and 20 m sprint times (r=0.93, P<0.001). However, the strength of these relationships decreased (r<0.65, P>0.05) when CoD ability was measured over distances less than 0.5 m. Analysis of coefficient of variation (CV%) data indicated that the 5-0-5 test had high intra (CV% = 2.8) and inter-test reliability(CV% = 1.3), with these data decreasing for distances less than 1 m (CV% = 3.5-6.9). Specific movement phase times were the least reliable measures of CoD ability (CV% 4.7-53.6). Results suggest a bias between high speed linear running ability and 5-0-5 time. However, an effective compromise can be found between test reliability and the external validity by assessing CoD ability over 1 m. Findings indicate that the current practice of assessing CoD ability over large distances in questionable.