Although most research on interpersonal coordination focuses on perceptual forms of interaction [1], many interpersonal tasks, such as crew rowing, also involve interactions of mechanical nature. There is no way to escape from such mechanical influences, as agents physically move each other. As such, the stringent nature of the mechanical coupling might stabilize coordination, but may also act as
... [Show full abstract] a perturbing source, hindering agents in their own movements and in return the coordination of the dyad. From coordination dynamics, we know that antiphase is less stable than in-phase coordination and that the stability of both patterns, but antiphase in particular, decreases with an increase in movement frequency, which may eventually yield transitions from anti- to in-phase coordination [2]. To investigate the effect of mechanical coupling on the stability of interpersonal coordination, we examined 16 pairs rowing in in- and antiphase at 20 and 30 strokes per minute on ergometers on ‘slides’ (allowing the ergometer to move with respect to the ground). The ergometers were placed behind each other and could either move independently (no mechanical coupling) or were physically connected (mechanical coupling). Kinematics of handles, rowers and ergometer were recorded at 150 Hz. Seven pairs showed transitions from anti- to in-phase, although the occurrences thereof were not affected by coupling. No transitions from in- to antiphase occurred. For the pairs that did not show transitions, for both interpersonal coordination patterns the variability of relative phase was lower when the pair was mechanically coupled, indicating that mechanical coupling indeed stabilized coordination.
References
[1] Schmidt, R.C., Richardson, M.J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In: Fuchs, A. & Jirsa, V.K. (Ed.). Coordination: neural, behavioural, and social dynamics (p. 281-308). Champaign: Springer.
[2] Haken, H., Kelso, J.A.S., Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological cybernetics, 51, 347-356.